September 15th, 2011 (#920)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt September 15th, 2011:
Whispered, Not Spoken, the Cultures are Broken:
"Many are Afraid, Down On the Knee,
Yet Things Are as They're Supposed to Be,
According to the Masters Who Rule the Nations,
Run Think-Tanks, have Moneyed Occupations,
A Long Time Ago They Formulated Their Plan
To Eventually Rule Over Every Woman and Man,
From Cradle to Grave with Obediency,
For Dissidents, There'd Be No Leniency,
No Sick, Disabled, or "Poverty Genes",
Those Authorized to Breed to Have DNA Screens,
Austerity for Most, More Profit for Owners
Of All Resources, New Slave Race Cloners,
As for the Old Man, He's had His Day,
Changes Left Him Dumb, Nothing to Say,
Transhumanism, Trans-Gender Thanks to Science,
In Political Correctness We Place Our Reliance"
© Alan Watt September 15th, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – September 15th, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
| cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
| European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu | |
|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on September the 15th, 2011. Newcomers, I always suggest at the beginning of the broadcast you should always make use of the cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, where there’s hundreds of audios for free download. And hopefully you’ll get an understanding of this very complex system. It’s a kind of magician’s act you might call it at the top. They have us all under different delusions. The media keeps us all over the map, the world map actually, by pointing here, pointing there. There’s not a day that goes by that they’re not pointing somewhere else, but it’s seldom what’s happening at home where the real changes are taking place. And that’s its job, because they’re owned by the same guys that own the banks. And all your media now is routed out through basically two different wire services that I think probably are both the one in the first place anyway. Why not just amalgamate them like they amalgamate everything else? We’re dealing with monopolists, of course, monopolizing everything that you need to live. All your food, water, and resources across the planet. It’s all been done, basically. You’re watching the last part being mopped up right now.
So, help yourself to the website. And remember too, you’re the audience that bring me to you. You can buy the books and discs I’ve got at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And that’s how I make enough cash generally to get through month per month. Because I don’t want to go commercial, in the sense that I don’t want an empire. I don’t want to start taking on people for work. So, therefore, it’s an awful lot of work to do yourself seven days a week. And I could certainly churn out the books if I wasn’t doing this, and make some cash, and go off where they won’t be around for a while. At least the big boys won’t be around for a while. They actually have a descending order of countries they want to take down, and you might get a few years out of a few of them before they’re also under the big shadow of the vulture’s wing, you might say. Anyway, buy the books and discs. And remember, from the US and Canada, you can use a personal check or an international postal money order from the post office. You can also use PayPal. Some send cash. And you can use the donation button too at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. There’s all how to do it on the actual website. So, please use that. Remember too, across the world, you’ve got Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal once again. And straight donations are awfully, awfully welcome, as we go through these inflationary times and everyone has got their hands out for cash, of course. And there’s so many toys to buy and all that kind of stuff.
But it’s up to you, because eventually you’ll have a monopoly on everything, including alternative broadcasting, as well. That’s why stations like this are pretty rare. There used to be a lot more of them, and they’ve all gone down the hill, almost, because that’s the way of the system. And you’ve got to have different points of view, and no real agendas, hopefully, at work, apart from just informing you as to what’s really happening behind the news, and what’s happening that you can add to the news that they’re omitting, because that’s generally what they do. They omit an awful lot of facts that would sway your mind in a different direction if you knew them. That’s how you come to your opinions. It’s because of the stuff that they omit generally. So, I try and go the other route and show you what’s missing from all of this, and where they’re going, the big boys behind it, how long it’s been in the planning stages and implementation stages, and you’ll find it’s a very old system with a very old agenda.
Nothing happens by chance in this world. If you left it to politicians, it would take them centuries to blunder through things by themselves. We have a ruling elite on the planet who have been around for a while and through their massive money accumulation and power and contacts, and the fact that they put politicians basically in. Carroll Quigley admitted that in his book, Tragedy and Hope, and his other one too, The Anglo-American Establishment. They put their own boys in politics around the whole planet. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, we’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And just trying to basically help people understand this big system they’re born into which everyone takes for granted. Of course you’re born into it, it exists, therefore it must be normal. It’s there. That’s how we take it, accept it so easily. And no one is around generally to warn you when you’re very young that the world is not as it seems. Nothing really is in this particular system of the world. The world has gone through many different systems. Generally all the same system. It’s always slavery in one form or another actually. And some slaves are better paid than others. And in ancient times it wasn’t much different. You could actually buy your freedom if you were a psychopathic slave and served your master well. And you’ll find in Rome, if you go around the big mausoleums there and all the graveyards there, you’ll find these monuments to people who were big slave traders who started off as slaves themselves. So, there’s always a leg up basically if you’re really good, a really good psychopath you can always get to the top. And that’s how the world is. It has never really changed, but this system of conology has learned from experience that you don’t have to beat people into being slaves and guard them all the time. You can actually pay them and then take most of it back from them in money, and they don’t object as much. Plus, you don’t need all the people to throw rags at them and watch them. They’ll buy their own clothes. They’ll buy their own vehicle to get to work. And they’ll do everything themselves. It’s far cheaper that way, more cost effective. And that’s the real system that you live in. It doesn’t matter what they call it.
And you know, since 911, remember the big speech at 911 that says nothing will ever be the same again. And that was like nothing will ever be the same for a while would have been a lot better, a bit more cheery. But it was nothing will ever be the same again. And they meant that. Because, you see, the big boys had the plan for a whole hundred years, basically, a war, and agendas to carry out within that hundred-odd years. And that’s what we’re living through right now. The complete change of all societies across the globe. The standardization of societies into one system across the world. That’s part of it too. Because in perpetual war government steps in, and all government agencies, even teachers, get extra authority. They feel the authority. It’s like a power they feel. And they’re given new curriculum to serve the children and new visions of the future as they call it, and they get right into the act and take it over. So, they train children to grow up into this new system and be international. They think they’re international. It sounds wonderful. It sounds really wonderful.
Everything sounds wonderful on paper, it’s just we’ve never had anything actually materialize in practice. Even the Communist charter in the Soviet system was a wonderful thing, a wonderful utopia if it actually existed, which of course it never did. You find some of the truth coming out too, at least little bits and pieces of fact here and there. And this article here is about the militarization of the police. And it says:
A Decade After 9/11, Police Departments Are Increasingly Militarized
(Alan: And it starts off with what they used to have as police and what their rights were and how far they could go with things. And then they go into the war on drugs. And then they started to get more and more weaponry and SWAT teams. It goes through the history of it, actually. And then it goes into the kind of militarization as they give more weaponry to the police. Not just M-16s like they were doing under the drug laws, etc. Part of this articles says:)
TERROR ATTACKS BRING NEW ROUND OF MILITARIZATION
The September 11 attacks provided a new and seemingly urgent justification for further militarization of America's police departments: the need to protect the country from terrorism.
(A: He called it.)
Within months of the attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center, the Office of National Drug Control Policy began laying the groundwork with a series of ads (featured most prominently during the 2002 Super Bowl) tying recreational drug use to support for terrorism. Terrorism became the new reason to arm American cops as if they were soldiers, but drug offenders would still be their primary targets.
(A: I would disagree with that. I would say that they wanted to militarize the police and the society to an extent in general. And that was part of their reason because they had big riots to come down the road. We all know this.)
In 2004, for example, law enforcement officials in the New York counties of Oswego and Cayuga defended their new SWAT teams as a necessary precaution in a post–September 11 world. “We’re in a new era, a new time,"
(A: And it gives you the articles concerning this. It talks about the incredible weaponry, all the M-16 machine guns, military grade, from the Pentagon transfer program. And then it actually said that in one Florida town, in Florida it says at three stoplights you’ll find seven M-16s there.)
In 2006 alone, a Pentagon spokesman told the Worcester, Massachusetts Telegram & Gazette, the Department of Defense "distributed vehicles worth $15.4 million, aircraft worth $8.9 million, boats worth $6.7 million, weapons worth $1 million and 'other' items worth $110.6 million" to local police agencies.
In 2007, Clayton County, Georgia -- whose sheriff once complained that the drug war was being fought like Vietnam, and should instead be fought more like the D-Day invasion at Normandy -- got its own tank through the Pentagon's transfer program. Nearby Cobb County got its tank in 2008. In Richland County, South Carolina, Sheriff Leon Lott procured an M113A1 armored personnel carrier in 2008. The vehicle moves on tank-like tracks, and features a belt-fed, turreted machine gun that fires .50-caliber rounds, a type of ammunition so powerful that even the military has restrictions on how it's used on the battlefield. Lott named his vehicle "The Peacemaker." (Lott, is currently being sued for sending his SWAT team crashing into the homes of people who appeared in the same infamous photo that depicted Olympic gold-medalist swimmer Michael Phelps smoking pot in Richland County.)
(A: And it goes on and on about all the weaponry and so on and so on, what’s happening across the whole of the US. But, you see, it isn’t just the US. They’ve done this across the globe. Astonishingly, that tells you, you see, they all had an international treaty already signed up, that if something was to happen they’d all jump in with obviously the same charters of what to do that they’d all signed prior to that. And that’s how, that’s why it happened. That’s why it happened across the whole planet. All the first world countries were suddenly onboard with the same anti-terror laws. It says:)
The DHS grants are typically used to purchase the Lenco Bearcat, a modified armored personnel carrier that sells for $200,000 to $300,000. The vehicle has become something of a status symbol in some police departments, who often put out press releases with photos of the purchase, along with posing police officers clad in camouflage or battle dress uniforms.
HuffPost sent a Freedom of Information Act request to the Department of Homeland Security asking just how many grants for the vehicles have been given out since September 11, how much taxpayer money has been spent on them, and which police agencies have received them. Senior FOIA Program Specialist Angela Washington said that this information isn't available.
(A: No, of course not, it’s classified. They don’t want to terrify you too much. But one day they’ll use them all, because, as we go down economically and with their planned starvation that they keep talking about at the Royal Institute of International Affairs think tanks, they have a big think tank just working on the coming food shortages. Go into their website at Chatham House and look at it. And they’ve been at that for sixteen years. Sixteen years. The coming food crisis. Anyway, it says that:)
Kraska estimates the total number of SWAT deployments per year in the U.S. may now top 60,000, or more than 160 per day. In 2008, the Maryland legislature passed a law requiring every police department in the state to issue a bi-annual report on how it uses its SWAT teams. The bill was passed in response to the mistaken and violent SWAT raid on the home of Berwyn Heights, Maryland mayor Cheye Calvo, during which a SWAT team shot and killed his two black labs. The first reports showed an average of 4.5 SWAT raids per day in that state alone.
Critics like Joseph McNamara, who served as a police chief in both San Jose, California, and Kansas City, Missouri, worry that this trend, now driven by the war on terror in addition to the war on drugs, have caused police to lose sight of their role as keepers of the peace.
And there’s much, much more to it. They go into all the different things that went on since 9/11. Anyway, I’ll put this article up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end. And it just gives you some of the statistics on the weaponry that’s been dished out since 2001 to do with supposedly the war on terror. And then you go into the start of it all too, how it came about. And you’ll find that there’s an article here, and it’s from the Foreign Affairs Magazine from the Council on Foreign Relations, not that you can believe everything they say either, because remember, you’ve got to look at all the people who work there, look at their names, look at them carefully, and you’ll find out who writes for them. Remember too, it’s just a branch of The Royal Institute of International Affairs, but it’s called CFR, with the Foreign Affairs Magazine that they put out. And it has an outer party and an inner party. The Outer Party can put the stuff out, but that’s really aimed. This kind of stuff is really aimed at the upper middle classes, the ones who are into high bureaucracies and things, to bend their minds. And Quigley talked about this, this system, where they would send newspapers for different categories and classes of people, and the ones they would actually aim for cities in fact who had the highest levels of bureaucrats. Well, this is what the Foreign Affairs Magazine is aimed at, the ones who think they’re in on it, but they’re getting conned again. Anyway:
Israel, the Neocons and the Arab Spring
The crisis in Israel’s relations with Turkey and Egypt - combined with the anniversary of 9/11 - casts an interesting light on the question of Israel’s relations with the neocons in America. If you remember, at the time of the invasion of Iraq, one of the most popular conspiracy theories
(A: So he uses that first, you see. This is by Gideon Rachman. And he says:)
was that US policy was being driven by a cabal of neoconservative thinkers – many of them Jewish – who were accused of acting at the behest of Israel.
There is no doubt that many of the neocons were and are strong supporters of Israel.
(A: So, out goes the conspiracy theory. He’s giving you fact, right?)
But there were actually always philosophical differences
(A: So, okay there are differences here.)
between important neocon thinkers like Robert Kagan and Bill Kristol, and the Netanyahu government. Above all, they differed on the desireability of democracy in the Arab world.
Well, there was no disagreement at all, because it was never intended to give them democracy as you think of it. We still dream of it ourselves back in first world countries. We’ve yet to see it. Anyway, they had no intention of giving them a free rein in their own. In fact, Kissinger said that. He wanted to go into those countries, starting with Iraq and have them warring with factions for maybe forty years to come. And the same with the rest of the countries. You can’t do that under democracy. See, they don’t want nationalistic governments.
Back with more, after this.
Hi folks, we’re back, this is Cutting Through the Matrix. And I’m actually reading an article, this article is not from the Foreign Affairs, it’s from International Affairs. And it says here too that:
The neocons were all for democratic revolutions across the Arab world –
(A: They were doing that with the use of the air force and the American military, of course.)
believing this to be the long-term route to political stability and prosperity. The Israelis were much more sceptical, fearing that democratic governments would take a much more populist (or maybe just popular) line on Israel – and endangering key regional relationships with Egypt, Turkey and Saudi Arabia.
As a result, the Israelis were notoriously cool about the overthrow of Hosni Mubarak - while neocons like Kagan were all in favour. The people who took the Israeli line on the Arab Spring in Washington were the so-called “realists” – many of whom were also opposed to the invasion of Iraq.
Some of the Israeli fears about what the overthrow of authoritarianism in the Arab world would mean for the Jewish state look reasonable enough at the moment. It will be interesting to see how long the neocons in Washington keep the democratic faith.
Remember too that Rumsfeld congratulated Mr. Obama not too long ago there for carrying on the same agenda of spreading democracy, revolutionary democracy is actually what they called it in the Bush, which meant they would start the revolutions by the soft power, the color revolutions, and then back it with military, which is what they always do. And that’s what you’re watching happening right now. Same agenda just goes on and on and on.
And I’m also putting a link up tonight about Australia and eugenics in Australia. Quite an interesting article. It’s called:
A Theory Out of the Darkness
Ross Jones has done research on how eugenics was a prime concern of Australian Scientists in the 1930s, and they attracted support from a lot of powerful people.
He was shocked at what he unearthed.
He gives you a list of different bigwigs involved and what they thought of the general public and people in general in fact that were all beneath them, and the fact that they thought they would have to literally sterilize an awful lot of the population, etc, etc. Not just Aborigines, but anyone at all who might become a burden on society way down the road. Remember too, they believed in the same poverty gene as they did in the US as well. They actually believe you have a poverty gene if you’re poor. And it’s quite a good article to read, so I’ll put that up, remember, and all these links up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the night.
And, it’s interesting, last night I was talking about the morality, you see, a culture that’s immoral not only don’t bind together to fight anything, they won’t do it. They can’t do it. You’ve got to have a common ideology basically or a common upbringing to know the basic rules and what you stand for. And that’s how you keep peace without police all over the place with M-16 machine guns. But, from all places, it comes from the Communists, who are still around, of course in Russia talking about what to do. It says:
Media censorship a cure for immorality say Communists
Russia’s Communist Party has submitted a bill to the State Duma aimed at creating a Supreme Council on the Protection of Morality on state TV channels and radio stations.
The bill is awaiting consideration by lower house legislators during their last session prior to the December elections.
If approved, a specially-created body would make appraisals “or, at least, express opinions on the extent to which TV and radio broadcasts promote public morality," one of the authors of the initiative, MP Nina Ostanina, told Itar-Tass.
Under Communist rule In the USSR, the state controlled all aspects of life –
(A: Kind of like today.)
including arts, literature, cinema, TV and radio –
(A: We’ve got Hollywood for that.)
to make sure no wrong “anti-Soviet” ideas would leak into people’s minds.
(A: Well, we have the same thing today, it’s from the top down. It’s called political correctness. We actually borrowed that term from the Russian.)
The idea currently proposed by the Russian Communist party, 20 years after the fall of the Soviet Union, has nothing to do with censorship, they assure.
"This is not meant as an instrument of censorship,” Ostanina said. In contrast to the situation in the Soviet era, the “moral assessment” would be made after rather than before a TV or radio program went on air.
“In any case, it would send a signal to conscientious producers of TV programs when broadcasts are unacceptable to public morals," the deputy added.
The bill makes no provision for any punishment or sanctions against broadcasters who regularly violate the rules of morality. The council would, however, have the right to appeal to the state leadership and a channel’s majority shareholders as well as to “urge the public to show its disapproval."
However another Communist faction deputy, Sergey Obukhov, suggested that the watchdog bodies should have far more extensive powers, including “the defining of TV channels’ program policy.”
“Every channel should have its specialization and cover particular topics,” he said in an interview with Vzglyad newspaper. Experts of the Supreme Council would make sure the state channels not only follow their editorial policy, but also that they do not show violence or pornography.
(A: You see, they’ve watched the West plummet. And they knew that too when they were still the Soviet Union. Khrushchev said that the West would become decadent and fall, and crumble from within, without firing a shot. And they knew that, because they were watching Hollywood all the time.)
Too many adverts would also not be welcomed. Instead, Russian channels should broadcast educational and cultural programs.
(A: And they actually said:)
“The television has been turned into a scrapheap,” Obukhov observed. The council’s task would be to sort that scrapheap out and bring Russian TV up to European standards.
Well, I hope they don’t bring it up. That’s bad enough, European standards. Anyway, I guess they see what’s happening with the more advanced countries as their society goes down the tubes.
And then you find, of course, this is really something. It’s like Australia right now is trying to show how politically correct it is with this Gillard in power. And it really goes to her head, believe you me, because she wants her name going down in history as the first prime minister to bring in the carbon taxes. But now they’ve got a third sex coming in, and you can get a passport for third sex. Three gender options: Male, Female, and X.
Back after this.
Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And just talking about how politically correct Australia has become. Being PC means you’re always in the avant-garde of the whole social agenda, the world agenda. And they’re going to trade off their carbon credits and dish out free ones to big corporations, just like they did in Europe, who’ll end up getting more millions off them as they trade amongst each other. Quite amazing, isn’t it, like a card game out of nothing. Not even any cards to hold. Anyway, back to this transgender thing. And now you’ve got three options on your passport it says. You can have male, female, and X.
The new category is only for use by intersex people –
(A: What’s an intersex? Is it like an interlane highway?)
who are not biologically entirely male or female.
Trangendered passport-holders - who have changed gender but not had surgery
(A: I don’t quite get that. Changed gender, but not had surgery. That means dressed up, I guess.)
will be free to choose either male or female, but will not be allowed to select 'x'.
(A: They call it the X-Factor here.)
X-Factor: Australian travellers can now choose from three genders on their passports
Previously, travellers were not able to change sex on their passport unless they had had surgery.
This is still the case in many countries, although any nation under the International Civil Aviation Organization's authority is eligible to introduce category 'x'.
In Britain, people do not have to have had an operation to change their passport details, as long as they have evidence that they are permanently living in a new gender role.
(A: A new gender role.)
Australian Senator Louise Pratt, whose partner was born female and now lives as a man, said the reform was a major coup for people who have trouble when going abroad because their appearance does not match their gender.
Support: Australian foreign minister Kevin Rudd said the change would 'make life easier'
She said: '"X" is really quite important, because there are people who are indeed genetically ambiguous and were probably arbitrarily assigned as one sex or the other at birth.
(A: But these are a tiny minority.)
'It's a really important recognition of people's human rights that if they choose to have their sex as "indeterminate", they can.'
(A: Indeterminate. That means they haven’t made their mind up.)
Kevin Rudd, Australia's foreign minister, said: 'This amendment makes life easier and significantly reduces the administrative burden for sex and gender diverse people who want a passport that reflects their gender
(A: This is how the Socialist system works. All this terminology that was first put out there by Sydney Webb. Sydney Webb and Beatrice, his wife, were the ones who came up with what they called bureaucratese for the Socialist Party. And this is how they word things, you know, to make them more acceptable in some way. They can’t say anything straightforward and short. It’s got to be a big long drawn-out thing.)
Peter Hyndal, who negotiated with the Australian government on the reforms on behalf of human rights advocacy group A Gender Agenda,
(A: As it’s called. A Gender Agenda.)
said the new guidelines were in line with more flexible approaches to gender in U.S. and British passports.
'It's amazingly positive,' he said. 'It's the biggest single piece of law reform related to transgender and intersex issues at a commonwealth level ever in this country - mind-blowing.'
No kidding. It’s mind-blowing all right. Anyway, this is the stuff that you’re fed, because we’re supposed to be so concerned as we’re all going down the tubes, and they try to focus in on really small minorities of people. And that takes your mind off things and gets you arguing about other things as well, while the big things that you should be arguing about are completely missed.
Interesting article too, this one here. It’s about a spy thing actually. Quite comedy. It says, it’s actually called a comedy:
Spy Comedy: CIA/Israeli (A: Together) Funded Group Creates Phony Terror Website
(A: And then the Germans bust them because the Germans thought they were Al-Qaeda. So, there’s the CIA and Israel working together. I told you they’re all in it together. And then the Germans bust them as Al-Qaeda.)
Group hired by FBI to create phony intelligence to sell to the US government arrested by German counter-terrorists as “Al Qaeda” cell. “Mossad busted in Al Qaeda sting, same group responsible for creating bin Laden videos and tapes taking credit for 9/11.”.
Eight German and Turkish teens and tweens are accused of supporting a terrorist organization because they translated propaganda pamphlets and videos by Al-Qaeda’s media service Al-Sahab into German language and published them in a web-forum. Their organization was active since 2006, mostly in Germany and Austria, and is known as Global Islamic Media Front (GIMF).
And then it tells you how the CIA and FBI and Israeli Intelligence, Mossad, set up these organizations. And they would even give these youngsters cash and show them how to keep their names off the websites and all the usual stuff to put out the propaganda, so that Al-Qaeda would get blamed for it.
This is how you do war. You must always muddy your enemy. And if he’s not around, you must simply create him or say he’s there. And you get everyone fighting everyone else. But it’s quite a good article. I’ll put that up tonight too.
And then, of course, I’ve mentioned this article before, but this goes further with it.
Emails reveal Obama aides' fears over loan to solar firm that went bust
(A: This same solar firm were giving a lot of cash to Obama for his election. It says:)
Officials from the Obama administration on Wednesday defended a $528 million loan to a solar panel company that went bankrupt this month.
The testimony claimed the company was a victim of global economic trends but that federal investment in alternative energy must continue.
It came as Republican and Democratic lawmakers raised questions about the decision.
It also came as newly-released emails show administration officials were raising doubts about the loan proposal to Solyndra months before it was finalized.
The emails, released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, show that the relevant credit committee decided 'not to engage in further discussions with Solyndra' in the final days of the Bush administration.
After the change in administration, officials restarted the loan review process for Solyndra.
The emails show that budget analysts felt rushed by the White House to review the loan guarantee in time for an announcement by Vice President Biden in September 2009.
Solyndra Inc. was a major presence in Washington and spent millions of dollars on lobbying there,
(A: So here’s a company lobbying the government for cash grants, basically, presents for their alternative energy program. And then they went bust. I wonder if any money went into it at all. It says:)
Its executives raised thousands of dollars for Obama and Democrats in Congress.
The collapse of the Fremont, Calif.-based company once touted by President Barack Obama ultimately left taxpayers on the hook for $528 million,
(A: Isn’t that normal though?)
raising questions if the loan was rushed to accommodate a company event in September 2009 that featured Vice President Joe Biden.
Not bad. You lobby the government for presents of taxpayers’ money. They all do this though. That’s really what governments are for, you know, to open doors for these top lobbyists to dish out your cash. And that’s the deal. When you receive cash grants from the government or you get big contracts from the government, you’ve got to get a kickback to the guys who signed it off to you. That’s how it’s always been. That’s how it really works. That’s how it’s always been.
And then you find too in this politically correct regime that we’re in, this world regime, that if you go against the tide you’re in big trouble from the PC bunch above you.
Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Resigns Over Global Warming
Dr. Ivar Giaever, a former professor with Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and the 1973 winner of the Nobel Prize in physics, abruptly announced his resignation Tuesday, Sept. 13, from the premier physics society in disgust over its officially stated policy that "global warming is occurring."
The official position of the American Physical Society (APS) supports the theory that man's actions have inexorably led to the warming of the planet, through increased emissions of carbon dioxide.
Giaever does not agree -- and put it bluntly and succinctly in the subject line of his email,
(A: which is actually reprinted at Climate Depot, another paper. I’ll put both links up tonight. And actually, you should look at the Climate Depot anyway. It’s got all of the amazing statements that have come out of that terrible man Gore’s mouth. It’s very amusing. Anyway, it’s a website devoted to debunking the theory of man-made climate change. This one is from Fox News. It says:)
"I resign from APS," Giaever wrote.
Giaever was cooled to the statement on warming theory by a line claiming that "the evidence is incontrovertible."
(A: That’s what really got him, because, you see, no science can be incontrovertible. You must always be able to prove it and prove it by anybody who gets all the evidence and do the same tests again and prove all the findings. And if you can’t do that, something stinks and it’s no theory, it’s no good theory at all.)
"In the APS it is ok to discuss whether the mass of the proton changes over time and how a multi-universe behaves, but the evidence of global warming is incontrovertible?" he wrote in an email to Kate Kirby, executive officer of the physics society.
"The claim … is that the temperature has changed from ~288.0 to ~288.8 degree Kelvin in about 150 years, which (if true) means to me is that the temperature has been amazingly stable, and both human health and happiness have definitely improved in this 'warming' period," his email message said.
(A: Because we go up and down all the time, right?)
A spokesman for the APS confirmed to FoxNews.com that the Nobel Laureate had declined to pay his annual dues in the society and had resigned. He also noted that the society had no plans to revise its statement.
(A: You see, it’s a must-be. It’s what you call a must-be. Like the war must be, must be a war across the world. Just like the New American Century group has continued with the Neo Libs and the Neo Dems. It’s the same thing. Same bunch behind them.)
The use of the word "incontrovertible" had already caused debate within the group, so much so that an addendum was added to the statement discussing its use in April, 2010.
"The word 'incontrovertible' ... is rarely used in science because by its very nature, science questions prevailing ideas.
You must always question your findings, over and over, even when it becomes the status quo, you must still question it, because you might be wrong and you must be willing to accept that. And as I say, I’ll put up the link to the Climate Depot, because it’s absolutely funny to read through it and the statements that have been made by top people, especially Al Gore, etc. And lots of information too. And there’s thousands of scientists come out against this, but it doesn’t matter. It’s the PC group that must go along and they’ll get well paid for doing so. And that’s the way the world is to go. It’s a control mechanism. It’s nothing to do with warming. It’s a policy of bringing us into austerity and for total control of government, right down to whether you can light a fire in your fireplace to heat yourself and stop you from freezing to death in the winter. Things like that, you see. That’s what it’s all about. And this is as good a theory as any to use, you see. That’s how it works.
Now, you probably all heard about the slave trade in Britain. Yeah, Britain. And because of this wonderful, basically multicultural thing, all from across Europe, because they can all go to Britain for the welfare and so on, they’ve got slavery there now. And James Delingpole talked about it.
Traveller 'slaves': Vanessa Redgrave can surely explain…
(A: She always stands up for the far left. She was even standing up for Blake the spy in the 60s, who was caught spying inside Britain. It says:)
Let's get one thing absolutely clear about the "slaves" who have been discovered by police imprisoned at a traveller's site (A: That’s gypsy.) in Bedfordshire: we must not to be quick to judge.
Which of us can say, hand on heart, that we have not at some time in our lives felt the urge to kidnap one or two stray migrant workers or alcoholics, shave their heads, steal their mobile phones, keep them in a shed or a dog kennel at the bottom of our gardens and force them to perform menial tasks for starvation rations and no money, beating them if they fail to measure up or try to escape?
And even those of us who haven't actually acted on this urge ought surely to be aware that with certain "communities" special exceptions must be made.
For example, you or I might think it is a bit off, murdering your sister, daughter or niece for failing to marry her first cousin and running off with someone she loves instead; or to have your daughter circumcised so that she is unable to experience any filthy sexual pleasure in her marital relations. But what we must learn to understand is that different cultures have different traditions.
(A: He’s doing a mockery of the PC group, crowd.)
We should understand honour killings and female circumcision as part of the melting pot of colourful cultural customs which have helped make modern Britain so vibrant and diverse.
And of course, we should extend similar tolerance and understanding to the free spirits of the traveller community, as they roam the land in search of new spots to concrete over and, of course, enhance with their charming, eccentric customs. As I'm sure UN ambassadress Vanessa Redgrave will be the first to point out when she appears on her inevitable visit to the Greenacre traveller site, it is WRONG, quite WRONG to condemn travellers for allegedly keeping slaves. After all, the Romans did it and we think they're civilised. And lots of US Southerners did it right up until the mid 1860s – and we think of them as gentlemen.
That's why we should congratulate the police for their sympathetic, softly softly approach to the problem. (If you think it is a problem, which probably makes you a racist, because as "travellers" they have racial status don't they? Check it out next time you have to fill in a census form). It seems they have been aware for quite some time of this quaint slavery custom....
It’s true. The police knew about it for years and did nothing about it because they were scared, because of being politically correct. That’s how bad things get, you see, when you bring in political correctness. It’s like the old Soviet Union, only worse. Only worse. It really is. And then, in another article on the BBC, they go into some of the things that happened.
Twenty-four men suspected of being held against their will have been found during a raid at a travellers' site.
Four men and a woman were arrested on suspicion of committing slavery offences in the raid at Green Acres travellers' site, Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, on Sunday. The men, who are English, Polish and Romanian, were found in "filthy and cramped" conditions, police said. Detectives believe some may have been there for up to 15 years.
(A: Fifteen years.)
“They were told they could not leave and if they did they would be beaten up and attacked” Those arrested are being held on suspicion of committing offences under the Slavery and Servitude Act 2010. They are being held at police stations across Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire. Weapons, drugs and money were also found at the site, police said. More than 200 officers were involved in the raids.
'Shockingly filthy conditions'
The men, all believed to have been victims of slavery, were taken initially to an undisclosed medical centre for treatment.
(A: And it shows you one of the sheds some of them were kept in.)
They have been placed in the care of the local authority.
(A: One of the detectives says:)
Det Ch Insp Sean O'Neil said: "The men we found at the site were in a poor state of physical health and the conditions they were living in were shockingly filthy and cramped.
"We believe that some of them had been living and working there in a state of virtual slavery, some for just a few weeks and others for up to 15 years."
He added that the men appeared to have been "recruited" from soup kitchens
(A: They went round the soup kitchens to grab the down-and-outs.)
and benefits offices and included people with problems such as alcoholism.
He said: "They're recruited and told if you come here we'll pay you £80 a day, we'll look after you give you board and lodgings.
"But when they get here, their hair is cut off them, they're kept in in some cases [in] horseboxes, dog kennels and old caravans, made to work for no money, given very, very small amounts of food.
(A: Maybe it’s an experiment for the New World Order to see how we’ll all be, if we could all put up with this kind of stuff. If you give us a TV and an iPod, we’d be okay.)
"That's the worse case. Some are treated a little bit better, but they were told they could not leave and if they did they would be beaten up and attacked.
And apparently it’s been going on. The cops knew about it back in 2008, and it’s only now they’ve made the movements, because it’s so, again, so politically correct not to go into this kind of thing. It’s cultures, and you know, it’s got special, special, you know, status and all that stuff.
And I also want to talk about the police. The police, it says, in Britain, because they dropped the IQ level for the British police too, just like America and elsewhere. They don’t want intelligent police in this day and age, because they’ll have to become utter brutes eventually when down the road they bring in food riots and things like that. Which are obviously going to happen. But some police officers are barely literate because the entry standards are so low. I’ll read this article when I come back.
Hi folks, we’re back, and I’ll take, actually there’s Sam from Toronto hanging on the line there. I’ll see if Sam is still there. Are you there, Sam?
Sam: Yes, I am. I’m still here. Thanks for taking my call. I just wanted to talk about actually, or ask you, how much do you know of a lady called Alice Bailey?
Alan: I know about Alice Bailey and the Theosophist society, Theosophical Society.
Sam: Exactly. Now, they’re pretty much tied in, or are exactly the same people as I guess the creators of the New World Order.
Alan: They’re actually tied in. They all had AB or HB; I was going to say HP, that’s a sauce. But you had Helena Blavatsky. That’s an HB. And then you had Alice Bailey. And then there was Annie Besant as well. And they all belonged to the Fabian Society as well, and helped to get the feminist movement on the go. That was part of their job for international Socialism.
Sam: Exactly. Now, one of her works, called the Externalization of the Hierarchy, basically talks about this coming New Age, and where their Masonic symbolism, the occult, the esoteric symbols and gods and dogma will be externalized into the general population. And funny how, if you have basically a channel like MTV, all you see is basically Illuminati or Masonic symbolism with the Eye of Horus, or the checkerboards. I see it happening right now, where she talks about how this religion is being externalized into the population. And, I believe this new, this next generation are going to be what they talked about, how they’re going to be, well, I guess the Enlightened, but we all know it’s not going to be Enlightened at all. They’ll be basically super-controlled and mindless zombies.
Alan: Absolutely.
Sam: They’ll think they’re living in a Utopia, but basically, forget about all of the Old World Religions and basically that’s the kind of world they have in store for us, and I see it unfolding right in front of our eyes. And it’s probably a year or two years away.
Alan: That’s right. That’s why they’ve been building up chaos in society. You always build up chaos before you bring out the order, the new order. And that’s what you’re going through, is the chaotic part, but you also see the externalization coming in as you live through it too. And you’ve got to remember too that Socialism, the Fabian Society and the founding members, you’ll see them hammering the world into shape with an anvil on their stained glass window. And the founding members actually said that they would exterminate a good part of the population as unfit to live basically. That’s part of Socialism. People think, oh, it’s welfare checks. No, no. True Socialism is, if you can’t work, you don’t stay alive. They will not keep you hanging on there, because you’re weak or ill or whatever. And in fact, some of the members wanted to gas the unfit. And that was as early as the 1920s. So, you’d be surprised what they’re really, really into. Remember too that the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry’s magazine, up into the 50s, maybe even 60s, was called The New Age. And that was the title of it. And so, they’ve been promoting this whole new system for a long time and they have radically transformed society by knocking down what they called the old gods, so that the true, actually they called it Lucifer, believe it or not. This is a multi-billion-dollar organization that was funded by the Astor family, bringing in this New Age scenario, talking about Lucifer, the Light-Bringer. You know, the one that’s PC correct, and all that. The one that knows how the world should be run. But you’re quite right. Thanks for calling.
Now, remember too, you can buy the books and discs, and certainly donate through PayPal and help me out. From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
Topics of
show covered in following links:
Police Increasingly Militarized
Neocons to Neolibs--Same Agenda
Eugenics in Australia--From Measuring Skull to Genome
Project
Russian Communist Party Say Television Has Turned
(Morals) into a Scrapheap
Australia--Passports Available for "Third
Gender"
Veterans Today---Spy Comedy
Obama and Aides in Loan--Lobby--Solar Racket
Nobel Prize-Winning Physicist Resigns over Claim of
Global Warming
--Climate Depot on This Story and More
Traveller Slaves--UK
Slavery UK--Product of EU
Britain--Police Officers Barely Literate
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||