Jan. 4, 2011 (#739)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 4, 2011:
Masters Elated when You're Castrated:
"Much of the News Comes from Old Tricks
First Set in Motion by Men of Eugenics,
On Death and Disease, They Speak with Elation,
Plus Famine to Decimate World's Population,
With Charts and Graphs, Copious Data,
They Show Too Many "Unfit" in Lower Strata,
Themselves, Resulting from "Better Breeding",
Fathers Particular Whom They Were Seeding,
Foundations Promote via Academic Grants,
More Professionals Promoting the Rant
That All Lesser Types Must be Subjugated,
Women Sterilized, Men Chemically Castrated"
© Alan Watt Jan. 4, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 4, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu |
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 4, 2011. Newcomers to the show go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and on that site you’ll see a whole bunch of other sites listed. These are the official sites I have. If you find sticking downloads of the audios on the .com site it’s because so many folk go into it at the same time. Try these alternate sites and you’ll get a cleaner download. They all carry audios of the talks I’ve given over the past. They carry transcripts in English of a lot of the talks as well. If you want transcripts in other languages go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you’ll find a bunch to choose from in there. Remember too, you are the audience who bring me to you. I don’t bring on the guests who sell you things and so on, so I really do depend upon you to keep me going. I try to give you alternate stuff, to show you the big picture; in fact, that’s what the audios are all about. They tie the ends together for you because really, you don’t have a long life. It doesn’t matter how young you are, your life is pretty short and there is so much to learn: to find out what’s been going on, why you have arrived at this stage in society, why it’s going through massive changes, and who is behind it, who is doing it, and even where your own thoughts come, and why your culture is the way it is. I try to go through all of that to show you that big powers, big players and big people in academia are working with governments to make this all happen. It’s a planned society and that’s what you are going through. So buy the books, CDs and DVDs that you’ll see on my web sites. You can donate as well, remember. Most folk don’t think about that much today; they expect everything to be free. They just scout around to find the sites and so on that are all free and the shows on the radio as well that are just completely free. They don’t want to part with their pennies because we’ve got nice video games and things to buy, or whatever. They let the ones go down the drain basically, the ones who can help them because they are unable to support them. They don’t want to support them. That’s your tough luck I suppose. But it’s also a shame a lot of people go down the drain over the years, and never to be heard of again, who had some good information. So buy the books and disks. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember too, donations certainly would be welcome because it costs a lot to do what I’m doing. It’s not a job. It’s not something I would have picked. Actually, I just said it’s time to come out and tell the folk what I know, because eventually knowledge is lost in time. It has to come out sometime, hopefully, and it does change people’s lives when they can get all the helping clues. They are helped along in the proper directions to find out what on earth is this big system which we call society, why are these big things happening, why do financial crashes come down at just the right time, or the wrong time you might say, why does the whole world go into an anti-terrorist mode, all together, in unison, because of something that happened in one city, in one country? It’s all because it’s all arranged that way. We’re going into the authoritarian society. That’s what you’re getting trained to go through now. You’re also being told to play like you’ve never played before, throw out all the rules, kick out the jams and enjoy yourself. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. We’re back and this is Cutting Through The Matrix. You know, it’s not too difficult to do your own searches and your own studies to find out that big players, big organizations run the world. These organizations are above your governments and they are within your governments. They do have their so-called scientists placed on board with them, especially now; it’s a fairly recent phenomenon to have all these scientists placed on panels within governments who then advise Presidents and Prime Ministers supposedly what to do. They all know, it’s an inside joke, because they are there to make sure the agenda – there is only one agenda – is carried forward. You can find the agenda, again, going all the way back to very old authors who talked about depopulation and getting rid of the unfit and all of that kind of stuff, and a world to come.
Thomas Malthus was one of the main characters shoved forth into history to start off the conversations, amongst the wealthy, about this, and about the coming problems of shortages, and sustainability, and all the rest of it. This is where all this comes from. It’s no coincidence that the big foundations today have carried on, through Rockefeller and other ones, and are promoting the exact same agendas. They also give us cognitive dissonance, as they call it, because we are trained to believe that charitable foundations and people who want to help us, are there to help us. When you also read that the same people are involved in DEpopulation, we go into a sort of click mode; we can’t compute the two: Is he here to help me or is he here to kill me? Literally we tend to go for the better judgment, the nicer judgment I should say – it’s actually the wrong judgment – but the nicer one, the one that doesn’t upset us too much because we’ve been trained to be sort of ego-syntonic and we don’t like to look at the bad things.
Here is an example of this because this article is to do with dengue fever and experiments with dengue fever mosquitoes and it’s backed by The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. You know, as I say, when you suddenly become extremely wealthy, stinking rich, you just have a born-again experience and you realize that it’s your duty to depopulate the planet. Then you find others like yourselves that are already in the process of doing it, and you join the club and you put your cash towards it. Another big story behind it, because these guys are not self-made at all; they are brought up into star status by preexisting societies, very, very wealthy ones. Here is the example…
$18m world-first trial to eliminate dengue begins in Cairns
Daniel Bateman / cairns.com.au / Tuesday, January 4, 2011
(Alan: This is Australia. Remember, I’ve read articles not too long ago where the US government had introduced dengue fever IN to the Florida Keys and they get outbreaks ever since; once in a while they get outbreaks of dengue fever. So dengue fever is actually used as a biowarfare technique by military. Here they are, going to do an experiment in Australia and this is from today’s paper.)
SCIENTISTS will know within four months whether today's release of 6000 bacteria infected mosquitoes is a success.
About 40 mosquitoes (A: What they claim is 40, I believe is probably more.) infected with Wolbachia bacteria will be released at every fourth home at Yorkeys Knob and Gordonvale in the next 12 weeks.
The bacteria blocks mosquitoes from infecting people with the dengue fever virus. (A: So you have to take this on faith, right.)
The $18 million world-first experiment has the potential to lead to a sustainable solution to dengue outbreaks in the tropics. (A: Now, why are they spending $18 million to release 40 mosquitoes? Hmm? Do you believe this?)
The project is funded through the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as well as the Federal and State governments.
The State Government has contributed $1.95 million to the program.
There are no vaccines for dengue, which kills up to 40,000 people globally a year.
Eliminate Dengue project leader and UQ researcher Scott O'Neill said the team should know by April if it was on the right track.
"If these initial trials are successful, they will be followed by similar trials in Vietnam towards the end of 2011," Prof O’Neill said.
"If those experiments are successful, then we might expect to see full implementation and control of dengue in the Cairns region in two to four years."
(A: This is what they tell you that they are doing. Meanwhile, as we all know, the big cry in academia at the top is sustainability and depopulation, big time. We also know that the big writers who came out in the 40s, 50s, 60s, right through up to the year 2000 were all promoting rapid depopulation. In fact, The Bill and Melinda Gates bunch attended the same meeting that Rockefeller was at recently, and I’ve read it on the air, some parts of it, where they said they’ve had enough really of trying to sterilize the public and basically what they want to do now is to go into rapid depopulation. Well, they have already talked about the means of rapid depopulation and bringing out of diseases is certainly on the cards. So here they are pretending they want to cure it all. It doesn’t make any sense… you’re back into cognitive dissonance again, click mode. What do you want to believe here?)
How safe is Wolbachia?
Wolbachia is not harmful to people or animals. (A: The ones they’ve infected it with.) The Eliminate Dengue research team have demonstrated this by allowing the mosquitoes to feed directly from researchers on a routine basis. (A: But I bet you anything those researchers have an antidote somewhere else in their bloodstream that was put there by people above them. That’s how it really works.)
Then you get into EUGENICS… in modern times and so on. You’ve got to understand that it’s truly, truly with you in a big, big way. The articles I’m going to read I’m going to put up tonight on my web sites, the links, for you to look up for yourself. Well worth keeping a hold of too; download them because things disappear so rapidly now from the internet. This says here…
EUGENICS AND EUTHANASIA QUOTATIONS IN MODERN TIMES
WORLD FUTURE FUND, BOX 1829, OLD TOWN, ALEXANDRIA, VA. 22313 / worldfuturefund.org
(A: They mention the people who were involved in eugenics, the political left as well as the political right, in modern times.)
What a lot of people do not know is the support for these ideas by people on the political "left" as well as the right in modern times. Note the stunning statements below by people like Bertrand Russell and George Bernard Shaw or those by Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood. (A: Planned Parenthood is simply abortion, across the world. I noticed recently they’ve got an incredible budget now and they are going across the world, big time, to sterilize and abort children, because she’s the one who called them ‘weeds’, you see. If they don’t have a function in society, if they’re from the lower strata, they’re called WEEDS – for the women and feminists who didn’t know who their great hero happened to be, a great lover of Hitler, and Stalin too by the way.)
THOMAS R. MALTHUS
THE MALTHUSIAN PRINCIPLE
(A: Malthus again, Malthus was the guy who first came out with the writings on, could the earth sustain a certain population. He was wrong on all accounts of course; in fact about 50 years after he finished his book he predicted that we would be standing about 5 deep on top of each other and that didn’t happen either. But he also called for the elimination of the poor. He was all in favor of advocating poorhouses and the sort of housing complexes in the most disgusting and disease-ridden areas, where the people would die off much faster. So it’s quite interesting to read the letters between himself and others. Then of course, those who came after him, in the same – I call them the same societies because they all belong to the same societies. And by the way, these characters were all specially bred themselves. They were inbred just like the Darwin family. This movement has been on the go for an awful, awful long time, right even all the way back to Plato, and before him I’m sure. It says here…)
CHARLES DARWIN
AGREEMENT WITH FRANCIS GALTON'S EUGENIC IDEAS
(A: Now, the Galton family eventually bred in to the Darwin family as well. Up until then the Darwin’s had only inbred with the Wedgwood family, for generations. But he agrees with them, you will see that in the first letter there. He agrees, this is a personal letter; it’s between the two of them, with their eugenics ideas and so on, and depopulation. Then, Charles Darwin, in The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd Ed. (London: John Murray, 1882), Chapter V, pp. 133-34:
ON BREEDING IMPERFECTIONS IN MANKIND
"With savages, the weak in body or mind are soon eliminated; and those that survive commonly exhibit a vigorous state of health. (A: In other words, disease and the whole bit, those who survive are the healthiest.) We civilised men, on the other hand, do our utmost to check the process of elimination; we build asylums for the imbecile, the maimed, and the sick; we institute poor-laws; and our medical men exert their utmost skill to save the life of every one to the last moment. There is reason to believe that vaccination has preserved thousands, who from a weak constitution would formerly have succumbed to small-pox. Thus the weak members of civilised societies propagate their kind. No one who has attended to the breeding of domestic animals will doubt that this must be highly injurious to the race of man. It is surprising how soon a want of care, or care wrongly directed, leads to the degeneration of a domestic race; but excepting in the case of man itself, hardly any one is so ignorant as to allow his worst animals to breed.
The aid which we feel impelled to give to the helpless is mainly an incidental result of the instinct of sympathy, which was originally acquired as part of the instincts, but subsequently rendered, in the manner previously indicated, more tender and more widely diffused. Nor could we check our sympathy, even at the urging of hard reason, without deterioration in the noblest part of our nature. The surgeon may harden him self whilst performing an operation, for he knows that he is acting for the good of his patient; but if we were intentionally to neglect the weak and helpless, it could only be for a contingent benefit, with an overwhelming present evil. We must therefore bear the undoubtedly bad effects of the weak surviving and propagating their kind; but there appears to be at least one check in steady action, namely that the weaker and inferior members of society do not marry so freely as the sound; and this check might be indefinitely increased by the weak in body or mind refraining from marriage."
Source: Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd Ed. (London: John Murray, 1882), Chapter V, pp. 133-34.
(A: By the way, that was part of the plans that they discussed a long time ago at the Department of Population – it’s really population control – at the United Nations, when they talked about fast takedowns in some countries by introducing disease. Well, bingo. You have a specific type of AIDS in Africa, very fast takedown. In the West they decided that disabling diseases that would make them ineligible for marriage would be used; that’s your crippling diseases and chronic fatigue. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. We’re back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just reading some quotes that the big boys put out in the past. Remember that Darwinism and the whole idea of natural selection, and the betterment of the race as they like to call it, is part of academia. It’s all to do with evolution; you must believe in evolution if you go into the universities in this day and age. It’s a must-be; you’ve got to believe in it. And along with all of that comes all of this as well, that I have just been reading here, because this is what it’s all based upon, survival of the proper kind of humanity and not the lesser kind. They want to get rid of the weak, disabled, and so on. That’s what the whole ecological movement is BASED upon, sustainability, etc. It’s a cover for this particular program which has been so well documented by themselves, and it’s taught in academia of course. It’s kept out of the general mainstream, at least in its more hardened, straightforward form. This is also what Charles Darwin says…
ELIMINATION OF THE POORLY ENDOWED ADVANCES SOCIETY
"Great lawgivers, the founders of beneficent religions, great philosophers and discoverers in science, aid the progress of mankind in a far higher degree by their works than by leaving a numerous progeny. In the case of corporeal structures, it is the selection of the slightly better-endowed and the elimination of the slightly less well-endowed individuals, and not the preservation of strongly-marked and rare anomalies, that leads to the advancement of a species. So it will be with the intellectual faculties, since the somewhat abler men in each grade of society succeed rather better than the less able, and consequently increase in number, if not otherwise prevented. When in any nation the standard of intellect and the number of intellectual men have increased, we may expect from the law of the deviation from an average, that prodigies of genius will, as shewn by Mr. Galton, appear somewhat more frequently than before."
Source: Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. 2nd Ed. (London: John Murray, 1882), Chapter V, pp. 136-37.
(A: You’ve got to understand too, this is what the whole idea came from for books, novels, like The Handmaid’s Tale and so on, where they talk about actually, special breeding, selecting special women for breeding. And by the way, they’d already been doing it back in the 1700s. Benjamin Franklin kind of touched on that in one of his letters, since he was a member of one of those clubs. It’s a very good site; Margaret Sanger, all of her cases are in it, all her quotes and so on. This is one of her quotes, from Sanger, for the feminists out there.)
MARGARET SANGER
THE DANGER OF UNCONTROLLED BREEDING
"Every single case of inherited defect, every malformed child, every congenitally tainted human being brought into this world is of infinite importance to that poor individual; but it is of scarcely less importance to the rest of us and to all of our children who must pay in one way or another for these biological and racial mistakes."
Source: Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization, (1922), p. 274.
PRAISE FOR EUGENICS
"... Degeneration has already begun. Eugenists demonstrate that two-thirds of our manhood of military age are physically too unfit to shoulder a rifle; that the feeble-minded, the syphilitic, the irresponsible and the defective breed unhindered; ... that the vicious circle of mental and physical defect, delinquency and beggary is encouraged, by the unseeing and unthinking sentimentality of our age, to populate asylum, hospital and prison. All these things the Eugenist sees and points out with a courage entirely admirable."
Source: Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization (1922), p. 175.
(A: She was completely, completely all for it. She was also for sterilization of what she called the feebleminded. And the US tends to forget that the Rockefeller boys and Cold Spring Harbor went into sterilization right up until the 1970 in the United States, by simple court orders. Many people are suing now because they were sterilized by these court orders and classified as retarded, defective, simply not good enough to have progeny.)
THE NEED FOR STERILIZATION
"STERILIZATION of the insane and feebleminded and the encouragement of this operation upon those afflicted with inherited or transmissible diseases, with the understanding that sterilization does not deprive the individual of his or her sex expression, but merely renders him incapable of producing children."
Source: Margaret Sanger, The Pivot of Civilization (1922), "The Principles and Aims of the American Birth Control League"
They also talk about birth control eventually being made mandatory, etc. Of course for that what they did was bring in people like Bernays who thought of other ways to do it. If you can’t get what you want with society, what you do is you change society and then they’ll accept what you want; you make them think it’s all for themselves. And they went to work creating the pill and then saying go ahead and have fun, exactly what Julian Huxley also talked about. He said, they will be able to basically have as much sex as they want as long as they don’t actually breed; that was the only stipulation. That’s what you’ve got today, the outcome of a big, big war going on, that most folk are utterly ignorant of; and a lot of them are quite enjoying it at the moment as well.
In the book, The Next Million Years, a descendant of Galton and the Darwin’s is Charles Galton Darwin. He was a physicist. He worked on the Manhattan Project, because all these families are into mass killing. He was all for the Atom Bomb. He worked on the bomb project. He wrote a book in the 1950s called The Next Million Years. IN the book I noticed too, as I was perusing it again for the umpteenth time there, a little quote and he said, eventually, eventually – he was talking about aging, creating life extension for those who have the best brains, the better breeding. So they’d be relatively old and obviously wouldn’t get partners so he mentioned the fact they would bring in a form of pedophilia and they would make pedophilia normal so that the wealthy rich could still breed and pass on their genes. Interesting isn’t it, that that’s all over the media today, as they push what they call ‘intergenerational sex?’ It’s all in a whole bunch of Hollywood movies too; that’s where you get most of your indoctrination. He then goes on to talk about in his book, Charles Galton Darwin, about how they breed racehorses. He talks about how they slaughter the ones that finish last, etc, then advises them we should really do the same thing with, well, humans, you know. I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix. There is a caller that’s been hanging on the line so I’ll take him. It’s Dave from Iowa. Are you there Dave?
Dave: Yes, thank you. I was just wondering, with your accent it sounds… I was just wondering, would you be English? Is it from England or Ireland?
Alan: What’s that got to do with the topic here?
Dave: Oh, I’m sorry. I should ask, it doesn’t have anything necessarily directly to do with the topic, but I was just sort of wondering, just as a way of, because I do listen to your show, quite often, and I guess I would just be curious to know about that.
Alan: Well, from Scotland, but what has that to do with anything?
Dave: Ok. Have you been, are you still in Scotland, or are you broadcasting from the United States? I was wondering how would you compare what’s going on in the US to what’s going on in Scotland right now?
Alan: In what manner though? What area?
Dave: Well, let’s say for example, when you are talking about kind of the social engineering that you are talking about happening. I assume that you mostly are focusing on the United States. Are you seeing the same sort of thing going on, do you see any difference between what’s going on here in the United States, for example?
Alan: The difference is, and here’s the key, is that the UK is way ahead, by a few years actually, only a few years, in this whole agenda to decentralize government, they are calling it, bringing in communitarianism. This is exactly what these eugenicists, if you even read their books, will tell you they were going to bring in in the 1950s. Eventually they will bring in a form of local government where you the people will have to decide who must live or die according to the food supply, etc, and the medical care available, and the budget that you are given for doing so. They have just introduced that into Britain. That’s coming fast. The US, under its new schemes coming in, even for health care, I’ve gone through this stuff, it’s from the RAND Corporation. That’s what the government employed to do the studies for the new American health care. Literally, they actually said in the RAND report, they based it on the British National Health System, which is in utter disaster. I mean, it’s like Canada; you are liable to wait for an operation, by the time you actually get in you are long dead. This is how it really is in reality. So it’s a rationing of health care that’s coming in and rationing of many different things that’s coming in, and the States, now, definitely because of the crash, etc, they are using that as well, and their massive debt that they have, it’s going to rampage ahead much faster I think in the US. There will be riots and stuff and that’s why they’ve been preparing for 20-odd years and building up internal armies and so on to deal with it. They are going to bring in eventually food rationing. That’s come from the United Nations. That’s on the Council on Foreign Relations web site as well; they have been working for 20 years on the coming food rationing, the coming food shortage. So it’s not going to be pleasant. This is a world agenda, you understand, and there is no country… in fact, this particular book, The Next Million Years by Charles Galton Darwin, the guy who worked on the atom bomb, he said, they’d have to make international agreements through the United Nations so that every country is on board with the same depopulation agenda, with the same tactics and so on, so that no country would opt out and become more powerful than another country. This was all arranged through many, many, many meetings, but the US certainly hasn’t seen the full impact of it yet. However, I have a lot of people in the States who travel a lot, city to city, and they are going through cities now where the stores are boarded up, out of business, there are fewer cars on the road because no one’s got the cash to shop. This is really expanding quite, quite a bit at this present time. So they haven’t seen the full effects of it yet; but this year, when they introduce all the austerity policies in the US and new taxes, etc, you are going to see it get much, much worse. They are not really far ahead of you, in Britain, it’s just that the British are so lethargic, with so many years of being dictated to – that’s how government works in Britain, they dictate downwards. They are lethargic with years and years of unemployment and so on that they just accept it. In the States there will be a bit more resistance to it, but it’s on the cards regardless of whether they want it or not.
Dave: When you say Britain, do you include Scotland in that?
Alan: Oh, yes. Scotland… it’s got a terrible country. It’s got a quasi-independent relationship for the last 2 or 3 years, but that’s a joke. It’s not independent at all, from England. It’s been run by England for hundreds of years. Actually I should say run by London; London runs everything. You can’t blame England or English people for it; it’s London itself that runs the whole kit-and-caboodle.
Dave: Do you happen to be familiar with the hedge fund manager Hugh Hendry; he’s a Scottish fellow?
Alan: Not him in particular but I know there are quite a few of them. Some of them came out of Scotland. In fact, it was a Scots guy that was sent down to even start up the Bank of England.
Dave: Okay. I thank you so much for answering my questions.
Alan: Thanks for calling.
As I say, that’s the key to it; we are simply going through an agenda. Most folk will never accept it. Those who are totally under the technique which Bernays talked about, if you can’t get the people to accept what we want them to do, head on – that’s when we would say, no, I’m not going along with that, no way – they simply do it in such a way that you don’t even know you are under attack. You are going to change your opinions, change your behavior, and adapt into the culture that’s evolving all around you, all by the same technique, at the same time, so you think it’s all quite normal. What they’ve called them in the past is revolutions, sexual revolutions, this revolution, that revolution, but in reality it was all planned for you, and everyone had a good time doing it, so they thought. But that’s the key to it, sciences. They talked about bringing in the sciences, big time, Bernays, on the general public. And academia is well on board with it, with the massive grants from not only foundations but from government itself to work on techniques to manipulate the minds of the general populace, using all the techniques available, and there are so many techniques available today.
Here is another part from Charles Galton Darwin’s book, the physicist, and he says on page 183:
It is in the biological sciences that the most exciting possibilities suggest themselves, perhaps because biology has only recently shown rapid advances like those made earlier in the inorganic sciences. I will only speculate on a few among these possibilities which might have great effects on human life. I have already referred to the possibility of quite new sources of food, and I need not enlarge on that further. Another type of discovery may be connected with hormones, (A: I’ve talked ad nauseam about the effects of the bisphenols and the phthalates and so on that are in the food supply and in baby food as well, etc, etc, etc, and how it’s sterilizing especially the male. He says hormones, …) those internal chemical secretions which so largely regulate the operations of the human body. The artificial use of hormones has already been shown to have profound effects on the behaviour of animals, and it seems quite possible that hormones, or perhaps drugs, might have similar effects on man. For example, there might be a drug, which, without other harmful effects, removed the urgency of sexual desire, (A: You know there are young guys, and there have been studies done on it, that are losing their interest in sexual behavior, before they are 25 now. And so is their sperm count just plummeting too.) and so reproduced in humanity the status of workers in a beehive. (A: So he wants to “reproduce in humanity the status of workers in a beehive.”) Or there might be another drug that produced a permanent state of contentment in the recipient—after all alcohol does something like this already, though it has other disadvantages and is only temporary in its effects. A dictator would certainly welcome the compulsory administration of the "contentment drug" to his subjects. (A: Look at all the children that are doped up – and we’ve all accepted this now as normal – with fake diagnoses that are written into a book as though it’s a fact, like the Laws of Moses.)
Another possible, though rather remoter, discovery suggests the most curious consequences; this is the control of the relative numbers of the two sexes. It is known that the sex of a child is carried by the sperm, not the ovum, and it is at least imaginable that some method could be found for sorting out those of the sperm cells which carry the male or the female character. It would thus become possible to regulate how many men or women there should be in a population. (A: Well, China was into that. They wanted more males and they used old-time techniques, because that was part of the cultural tradition already in China. They simply promoted it, because they wanted lots of male workers, and soldiers.) If such a practice could be developed it is sure that for a time there would be a great unbalance in populations. A nation with ambitions for conquest would produce a large number of men for its soldiers, but would pay for it by not having enough women to give birth to the soldiers for succeeding generations. On the other hand, just as the stockbreeder keeps few bulls and many cows, another nation might decide that it needed few men in order to maintain its numbers. Would such a predominantly female population be able to stand up against the male one, or would a "rape of the Sabine women" rectify the disproportions? (A: So then he goes on and on and on. He says…)
To produce effects of these kinds there must be a master, and the master must be above and not subject to the procedure he is enforcing on his subjects. The dictator could not afford himself to take the “contentment drug", because if he did so his capacity for rule would certainly degenerate. It always comes back to the same point, that to carry out any policy systematically in such a way as permanently to influence the human race, there would have to be a master breed of humanity, not itself exposed to the conditions it is inducing (A: Meaning, forcing…) in the rest. (A: Now, remember this guy was related to the Huxley’s. He was related to the Darwin family, the Galton family, all eugenicists; all through every generation of them, eugenicists. He was telling you there, they already existed because they were all offspring of SPECIAL SELECTION… SPECIAL selection, where they chose certain partners, or they were chosen for them. With the Darwin side of his family, for generations they only intermarried with the Wedgwood family. When Charles Darwin’s wife died, he married his mother’s sister! They were already a master breed, you see, as far as they are concerned. They are not the only ones. You’ll find this in the same philanthropic leaders as today, at the top, the top members... if you wonder what’s really running the world.) The master breed, (A: …would have to be wild animals, you see, not subject to having their brains tampered with, with contentment drugs or anything else, or injected with poisons to kill off brain cells. This is what I’m saying here because they have done this to the humans.) The master breed, being wild animals, would be subject to all the fashions, tastes and passions of humanity as we know it, and so would never have the constancy to establish for generation after generation a consistent policy which could materially alter the nature of mankind.
In connection with the recent wonderful advances in medical science, this is the place to mention a matter that will very soon indeed be of immediate importance. Since in the normal condition of the world there will be a margin of every population on the verge of starvation, it seems likely that there will have to be a revision of the doctrine of the sanctity of the individual human life. (A: Exactly the same thing as the first CEO of UNESCO, the United Nations wonderful organization, said, and that was this guys’ cousin by the way, Julian Huxley. There would have to be a revision of the doctrine of the sanctity of the individual human life. And by the way, as I say, when you see corpses plasticized and hung up in bar rooms and art galleries, you are getting taught, you are being taught to be dehumanized, that life is really truly worthless, it’s just another animal, and so what if they hang it up there for everyone to have a peek at and a laugh at, at the same time. You are laughing at you own future there folks because that’s where you’ll end up too. He also goes into world government, Charles Galton Darwin, and how they’d have to do it through agreements, international agreements. He belonged to United Nations organizations, lots of them. He belonged to the top think tanks who planned this kind of stuff. Remember too, he talks about the people as being children; you can’t tell the children the truth. Are you getting what I’m saying?)
Consider next what are likely to be usual relations between the provinces. (A: He calls them provinces, or regions, of the world, that it’s been broken into, especially in North America.)
In this case North America might fall into four or five provinces, (A: That’s the regions.) and western Europe into one or two; it is never to be expected that there will be any permanence about the numbers of them or about their boundaries. Consider next what are likely to be usual relations between the provinces. It is too much to expect that there can ever be a permanent world government benevolently treating all of them on a perfect equality; such an institution could only work during the rare occasions of a world-wide golden age. (A: He’s talking about massive food consumption and distribution and all the rest of it.)
So that’s what these characters are in to. Your future was planned before you were born and everything that you think is normal in culture actually was given to you by these kind of characters and think tanks, and then marketed into your brain through your televisions, movies, and so on, and novelists too; they hired lots of novelists to get the ideas across into your minds. He also goes through famines, using famines, which would be manmade famines. They’d bring on disasters and all these wonderful ways to depopulate the world. Then he goes on to, if you wonder where the United Nations got the idea that China is the model type for the world to follow, he says on page 198… remember this was written in the 1950s. He says…
It would seem that in its constancy of character, both in its virtues and in its defects, the Chinese civilization is to be accepted as the model type of a civilization to a greater degree than any of the other civilizations of the world. (A: Because you see, they have their one child per family and they have mass abortions and a government that is an authoritarian government that doesn’t stand any rebellion nonsense or anything else; and they accept their famines quite naturally and die off like dutiful little citizens when it happens. He says here too, on page 203…)
Is it possible that there should arise a eugenic creed, which—perhaps working through what I have called the method of unconscious selection—should concern itself with the improvement of the inherent nature of man, instead of resting content with merely giving him good but impermanent acquired characters? Without such a creed man's nature will only be changed through the blind operation of natural selection; with it he might aspire to do something towards really changing his destiny. (A: So, again, he praises China as the type we should all follow and that’s what the United Nations does push. I'll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through The Matrix, just finishing off here, on a little ramble, that wasn’t really arranged that way – I didn’t arrange it at all, I just decided to go into this tonight when I got on the air. Here is also a little part from HG Wells, that wonderful guy who belonged to the Fabian Society, which is still of paramount importance today. It was set up and founded by and funded by wealthy, wealthy families, the Astor family being one of them. They knew they could not fail actually, when you read that from Wells’ writings. He says, they knew they couldn’t fail by using sciences, especially the sciences of the mind upon the general public. And unfortunately he’s been pretty well correct. He goes on to talk about the men of the new republic. He’s talking about a world republic by the way.
The men of the New Republic ... will rout out and illuminate urban rookeries and all places where the base can drift to multiply; they will contrive a land legislation that will keep the black, or yellow, or mean-white squatter on the move; ... so that childbearing shall cease to be a hopeful speculation for the unemployed poor; ... This thing, this euthanasia of the weak and sensual, is possible. On the principles that will probably animate the predominant classes of the new time, it will be permissible, and I have little or no doubt that in the future it will be planned and achieved."
Source: H.G. Wells, Anticipations of the Reaction of Mechanical and Scientific Progress Upon Human Life and Thought, Final Chapter "The Faith of the New Republic", (1902)
It reminds me of all the tent cities that they’ve got in the States now. The folk are kept getting moved on and moved on and moved on. Of course, when you are starving to death you are not too worried about, you are not really thinking about sex and so on so much; you are trying simply to survive. I’ll put this link up tonight to this very good site, with a lot of their quotes and parts from their books in it as well. People should get The Next Million Years, the one I was reading from, by Charles Galton Darwin. I mean, this guy literally was specially bred for his purpose in life, as were the rest of the Darwin family. He doesn’t pull punches. At times he will say some incredible things, that sound rather nice, until you really realize –because of the terminology he is using – until you realize what he’s actually advocating. He’s quite blunt at other times too. If you wonder why the populations are plummeting in the West and the sperm count is going down to less than 25% of what is should be, and even that is immotile – I mean, the sperm can’t find the ovum; they have all been severely damaged – then you understand that it’s not… NOTHING HAPPENS ON A MASS SCALE IN SOCIETY WITHOUT SOMETHING BEING MADE TO MAKE IT HAPPEN. Nothing happens… you don’t suddenly evolve into sterile creatures. It doesn’t happen. It doesn’t happen at all. They also talked about using hormonal treatments on women; they would be unaware of it because, again, it would be in their foods as well and so on, and how it would affect them.
Believe you me, they knew damn well that the cancer rates and so on would increase because that’s all part of the big, big plan. That’s truly, folks, the world we live in. I don’t want to give you nicey-nicey little shows here. I don’t want to scare the living daylights out of you. I’m trying to get you informed so that you understand what’s actually happening today. How much money has the Cancer Society brought in over the last, what, 80-odd years? Where are the advances in treating cancer? Tell me that! There haven’t been any. It’s slash and burn… slash and burn. Same things. And who started that? That was the Rockefeller Foundation who gave you your present medical treatment, because they have no intention of giving a cure for the diseases they cause.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
From Infecting Minds to Infecting Mosquitoes
The Eugenics Agenda
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
"Cutting
Through" |
& |
"Waiting
for the Miracle....." |
|
Ancient
Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |