October 22nd, 2010 (#691)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt October 22nd, 2010:
Moral Relativity Conquers by
Stupidity:
"Have it All" Starting With the Juvenile,
Then Adults Regress to Infantile:
"To Manipulate People, Study Their Kind,
Then Subtly Introduce a War on the Mind,
Being Social Creatures, Easy to Manage,
Break Their Taboos, Cause as Much Damage
To the Safety Structure which Holds Together
The Fabric of Survival, That Braves the Weather,
Best Tactic of All, Tell Them to Be Free,
"There's No Consequences, You Will See"
All That "Codes of Conduct and Deprivation,
Just Go For It All, Seek the Sensation",
This Battle is Over, See the Devastation,
Broken Families, Single Moms, Welfare Nation,
Big Government Comes Forth to Allay the Fear,
Demanding Obedience, "You'll Be Austere",
Says it Can't Go On, Unless Taxes are Squeezed
For More Social Workers, Abortions, Treat STDs,
Your Enemies in Past were Honest, Prolific,
Told of Their Plans for Tyranny Scientific"
© Alan Watt October 22nd, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - October 22nd, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
| cuttingthroughthematrix.com alternate sites: cuttingthroughthematrix.net , .us , .ca alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca |
mirror site: cuttingthrough.jenkness.com |
| European site includes all audios & downloadable
TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up: alanwattsentientsentinel.eu | |
|
Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS: Canada and America: PayPal, Cash, personal checks & Outside the Americas: PayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE – AND – Click the link below for your location (ordering info): |
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on October the 22nd, 2010. Now, newcomers as always, I suggest you look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, and help yourself to the hundreds of hours of talks I've given over the past few years. And remember too, all those sites you'll see listed there are good alternate sites. They're official sites, but alternate sites, in case you find sticking on download from the .com site. Lots of folk go into the .com site at the same time, and sometimes that happens. They all carry the same audios. They all carry a lot of transcripts in English for print up as well. And if you want transcripts in other languages and audio, you can go to alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and you'll find a whole bunch of languages to choose from there. And while you're at it too, remember that you bring me to you. You're the audience. And I don't ask for advertisers. Actually, I get approached by them, of course, but I don't take advertisers' cash. And that's how most hosts survive, and that's okay. But I think to an extent, you have to bring a lot of guests on, etc, and technically the audience is listening to an hour's ad, whether they know it or not. And therefore, I turn down the lucrative side of it. It's up to you to support me. You can do so by buying the books and discs and so on that I have, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And from the U.S. to Canada, you can use a personal check to Canada. That works fine. You can also use an international postal money order, from your post office. I stress international. And you can use cash, and some people use PayPal too, to purchase or donate. You'll see a donate button there. Just send me the donation, the appropriate donation, and the price list is all there too, of course, and a separate email with your name, address, and order, and I'll get it out to you. Across the rest of the world, same idea, with the addition of Western Union for wiring money. It's kind of steep. Money Gram is cheaper, I believe. And you can also send a check form from Money Gram too, by post. Cash or PayPal to donate or purchase. I stress again, to purchase through PayPal, send the donation and a separate email following it, with your name, address, and the order, and I'll get it out to you, very quickly. Mucho pronto, as they say.
We've gone on about the New World Order for years, because it's always in transformation to the next stage of it. People think it's always, and they've always thought this, I used to be surprised, that they're always looking for some sort of cataclysmic event. And saying, when will it all come down and the world will change forever? It's been happening your whole life long. And it's done incrementally on a thousand fronts. Generally all at the same time, every other day. It's just that you never hear about it in the mainstream until long after it's happened, through treaties and various organizations, foundations, think tanks working together towards a common goal. And your teaching too, changes down through the years, because you're upgraded. Every generation that goes into school, gets upgraded for what they will experience, and indoctrinated for the experiences they will experience in their lives, which are different from those who went before, because we're living to an agenda. And that's what people will fail to understand, over and over again. We're living through an agenda. Even thought the Big Boys, many of the Big Boys who worked on their part of the agenda in their own time, as far back as fifty or even a hundred years ago, outlined it in their biographies, and they love to boast about it. And they also know too, strangely enough, that most folk can read those biographies and say, well, they don't really mean it. You know, they say these things, but they don't really mean it. You see, that's a choice that you come to. You don't really want to believe it. That's what you're saying to yourself. "I don't want to believe that, so I won't. It makes me too uncomfortable to think we're going into a totalitarian form of living," if you'll call it living, and a regimented lifestyle from birth to death. It's kind of a nasty unpleasant thing to look at, but some folk will love their slavery. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, we're back, Cutting Through the Matrix, and just mentioning off the top that most folk, really are acclimatized, through again, various religions, like Revelation, that type of thing, that the end comes, the end of everything that they know as a system or a world or a reality, comes to an end in a flash, all of a sudden. And that might happen when you get the brain chip, mind you, and I'm not kidding about that. That certainly could happen. However, apart from that, they don't realize that the world is changing all the time, and it's planned that way. It's planned that way. And the World Health Organization for instance really has been behind so many changes in your lives, and you don't even know it, through various agreements and ratifications and even outright treaties that they've had people sign across the world. They brought in the War Against Tobacco, and that's why the prices skyrocketed in every country. The War Against Obesity, and that's why eventually you'll all have to get weighed and checked throughout your lives, and your children are already getting that in some countries that are more Socialist, like Britain. And there's much more to come. The whole inoculation campaign and upgrading all your inoculations frequently is still to come out yet, because they've signed a lot of treaties about that too. Sometimes they don't call them treaties, they call them agreements, and then they hand them the treaty, and they sign them. So that becomes law.
People don't realize that so much that's happening in their lives is because there's a United Nations that has a branch of government equivalent to every branch that you have in your federal government, even bigger, in fact. And they were set up to become not just a meeting place to hammer out disagreements and so on, but to actually be the form of a Global Government idea. They call it "governance" to throw you off. Meaning, that countries still have a sort of a semi-autonomy but not really at the same time. It's one of these doublethink things, you see. And we know for instance that the United Nations was all behind the unification of Europe. They're all behind the unification of the Americas and the Pacific Rim Region as well. They're all behind all of that, why? because the same guys who created the United Nations, created those particular ideas as well, for unification. Three massive trading blocs under a world government. Karl Marx talked about it. And Marx was funded by the same bankers that helped fund the United Nations and the Milner group and all the rest of it that became the Royal Institute of International Affairs. They have branches in every country, and they have members in governments in every country. And every prime minister and every president is a member of it too. Whether they want to call it that name, or the Council on Foreign Relations or one of the handful of different names they use for different countries, it's all the same thing.
And most folk even find it hard to believe that people can with such organization and such money too, because remember the Milner group that became part of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, they were actually made up of international bankers. That's bankers, private bankers that lend to nations, you see. And they have the money and the organization, and the agenda, and the think tanks, and the foundations to make it happen. They can set up any foundation they want, with one particular goal. And hire, retire, hire, retire, generations until it's accomplished. Even if it takes two hundred years they'll still do it. What can compete with that in this system where money rules? Nothing. Nothing can compete with that you see. Can't be done. If you're playing by their rules, it cannot be done. It's impossible.
You know, as I say, Beria, who was the NKVD police chief for the Soviet Union, the early Soviet Union, the Bolshevik regime. He was the head guy who talked to the Comintern Groups that went over to Russia. That was International Communism, and the young Communist Leagues and so on. They would go over there and get their marching orders and their speeches and wined and dined and shown beautiful areas of Moscow, but never the prison camps. That kind of stuff. And they'd come back and be all full of zeal to bring this wonderful free society back to the Western countries with them. Well, Beria in '34 said that using techniques that Pavlov helped create, and it was well known by the world press that Pavlov was given such incredible status. In fact he was hailed as a hero in the West, as well, because of his ways of finding and creating conditioned responses and reflexes and so on. Indoctrination and even breaking down not just animals but people. Ways to break them literally down psychologically, and then reprogram them to do whatever he wanted them to do. That's what he was really hailed as. Well, anyway, he worked hard with big teams of scientists, from across the world by the way. In fact, H.G. Wells loved Pavlov so much that when he visited him, and that was his hero, he left his son with him to be trained by Pavlov. And his son eventually became a zoologist of all things, and then worked in New York, and I think with the United Nations, as well.
Anyway, that's by the bye. That's just off my head here as I ramble on. Getting back to the point, Beria said that at that time, 1934, it used to take a generation, 70 years he said, to change anything within society, be it towards free love, which they were pushing in the late 1800s, via H.G. Wells, and then the Fabian Society that he helped found in the early 1900s, and to destroy the family unit, for instance. That was the goal of it. And to detach the emotional bonding part of family or mating, and separate the sexual act completely, so it's a separate act altogether with no emotion involved. That's where you are today, and that's where it all came from. That's why it was pushed, from the top down. Because government cannot feel safe and secure until it's destroyed the family unit. And then government can talk right to you individually, by your computer, or whatever else. In fact, some governments already have it set up that they can contact you by your computer and email or your phone. It's going to be a lot more of that shortly. You'll hear it pushed more and more until it's mandatory.
And Beria said, in '34, that now with our techniques today, we can literally upgrade the children for what they'll be expected to see and experience in their lifetime every four or five years. Now remember, they were working towards 50 year and 100 year plans. Different parts of plans for societal change. So every intake of children, with their lifespan expected would be indoctrinated for exactly those changes they would see in their lifetime, and so they'd be indoctrinated early and they would accept the changes as though they were quite natural. That's how perfected it was back then. Can you imagine how perfect it is today? And it wasn't just happening there too, it was happening across the Western world. And they brought in different groups from say, Frankfort in Germany and the Frankfort School that came from the Old Vienna School in fact, in actuality, in behavior modification. And they also worked towards it to change the West through even more subtle means, but getting to the same goals basically. Nothing happens by itself. It's promoted from the top down. It doesn't happen by itself at all.
The people grab a hold of that which fascinates them or appeals to them, especially if they think it's breaking from the past and giving them freedom. They grab it. And believe you me, you can be enticed into servitude, like Huxley said, Aldous Huxley. And you can come to love your servitude, because you become familiar with anything, anything that you think you're deciding for yourself. In actuality you're doing what everybody else has been guided to do at the same time. That's how culture is changed.
Now, in the world that we live in we're bombarded with mainstream media, and that's about all we get is mainstream. Most stories come from mainstream, even on the internet. And people can't even read the stories properly. They don't know what they're reading, how they're reading it. They don't even stop to say why is it presented this way, for instance. Or, look at the ads down the right-hand side of it. And you'll find often, for instance, that you're being induced into a form of schizophrenia. Sometimes by really terrible stories, for instance, and down the side it's all the boob babes and who's got a boob lift and a face lift and all the rest of the lifts they get these days. And you don't realize that anything can be made into a kind of mush. Something that's sad or tragic or bad, or whatever, can be turned into a form of mush in your mind, you see, until that becomes surrealistic in itself, so that the horror is mixed up with sex and happiness and all that kind of stuff. It becomes vague, surrealistic, schizoid. And that's part of psychological warfare. All the media uses it today. And Britain of course, like all other things, spear-headed the techniques for media control. They've been at this for a long, long time.
You don't realize the work that geo-politics puts out from countries like Britain. When you read the writings of Lawrence, that's Lawrence of Arabia, when you read his writings, like the Seven Pillars of Wisdom, for instance, you'll see that he talks about being sent over, trained, picked at university and sent over with a whole group, his peer group basically. They were all taught Aramaic and various Aramaic languages and dialects. And they were given lots of cash to set up newspapers to give to the Arabian peoples. And they hired hundreds of locals who would do anything for cash in poverty-stricken countries, and they'd go around bazaars and so on and listen to the gossip to see what they were saying about the stories they'd implanted in their papers. This is all, remember, this is all pre-internet obviously. They did the same thing back then. Is this working? Are they picking up on it? Today it's easy, because compared to today, they just have to do a sudden trend. In fact, you're putting all the data into computers, it's automatically sectioned off into certain sections, and they know what's trending and all the rest of it. They create the trends, then they see if it's working well, and how many hits they get, etc, to see if it's working on you. And from those trends and so on, they can predict if there's behavior modification, and even your attitude modification involved in those trends and sunk and embedded in the articles. They can predict with pretty good certainty that a good portion of those people who read it will start to chat about it, and then they will become more politically correct in the new direction that's being pushed, whatever it may be. And I'll be back with more after this break.
Hi folks, we're back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Just rambling a bit before the start of tonight's topics, but maybe it ties in. I don't prepare the shows, so I just talk off the top of my head, and today I was doing a lot of stuff outside, which was necessary, regardless. I don't have the time to just hunt and spend the time on the internet and so on. Really, most stories are really in a sense irrelevant, that are given out by mainstream, because tomorrow there will be a whole bunch of new stories, and stories, stories, go on forever. Endless stories. The Never Ending Story, that's what you're living, you see. And if we can't do anything about most things, what's the point? Because people haven't quite got it into their heads yet that you're under complete authoritarianism, and you have been for quite some time. Quite some time.
We don't even get the pretense anymore that governments are even serving you. That doesn't even exist anymore. And of course the Club of Rome came up with that idea too, and the guys who set up the League of Nations and then the United Nations, the same boys set it up. They said they'd have to bring in authoritarian governments because people wouldn't simply obey them, and voluntarily be sterilized for instance, reduce the population, eat less, and work harder, and share the money abroad. The whole Marxist idea from the Manifesto was to be pushed across the world by the bankers, by the way. It's much easier as I've said before for bankers who lend to nations to have governments be the collector for the cash that's due and put the taxpayer down as the guarantor for all these loans that never get paid back. They love that. It saves them sending out their henchmen and getting beaten up, and some of them get hurt and all the rest of it. It's far easier to get governments to authorize it, and that's why all your banks borrow from private banks and so on with compound interest when they could easily print their own money and then sell it to the banks, cover their costs, and basically they wouldn't even have to tax you for most things. That happened at one time. They didn't have to tax your income and stuff like that.
And by the way, the Royal Institute for International Affairs / Council on Foreign Relations proudly say on their own website that they were the guys who brought in the bills in all countries for personal income taxes and property taxes. You see, they knew. They were all for the Marxist ideal society, controlled society, where experts would rule it. Scientists and so on would rule and be the bosses with the right intelligentsia acting as politicians. They were all for that society. And that's why Professor Carroll Quigley who was a historian for the Council on Foreign Relations said as much. He said that the new system would be a feudalistic type system where CEOs, professionals and so on would rule the world, and again, he touched on the fact there would be an authoritarian type of society. They couldn't just cajole people or humor you into signing your own death warrant. You'd have to be forced into doing it basically. And he agreed with them too. He was a member of them. He thought everything they said was a good idea. He didn't agree with some of their methods, but he didn't disagree about their ends.
So, you know, the United Nations was set up as I say to help bring population down and under control for a global governorship to control easily. Too many people, you see, have always terrified the elites in all ages. Sometimes of course, in big wars, as they're trying to take over and gain more territory and having a feud amongst themselves, as they have done in the past, they would need as many peasants as they could to throw over the trenches and be slaughtered, the idea being if you've got ten guys at the end of the show and the enemy has got nine, then technically you've won the battle. And that's literally how they ran World War I, all by numbers. But now you see, now that they've got the World Government pretty well here, we're all global, it's in all the papers all the time, then they don't need you, and they want to go ahead with this really planned society, the scientifically run society. And that's why all the goodies, all the goodies and things that you used to take for granted have been taken away from you now. And you have to change and modify your behavior. You already have, by the way, because the easiest way to modify behavior is to place something in your environment that wasn't there before, like the computer. How many hours per day do you sit glued to that silly thing, typing away your life, and putting all your data out there, or texting people and all that kind of nonsense? And, of course, the NSA gathers every single scrap that you put in there, and has a complete profile on your daily activity, and that gets put into your personality profile in your virtual reality you, and you're already, you're loving your servitude, because it's fun, isn't it? This part's fun. You never thought it would be fun to serve. Wait until it goes even deeper though, as it's going to.
Now the United Nations also, as I say, through its various agreements and charters that everybody signs and treaties. They don't like to use the word treaty but sometimes they'll use it, also want to control everybody's health and so on. They've even got it down in the World Health Organization that everyone in the world is entitled to the basic, basic healthcare. Basic, I'm talking about minimal health care. And that's why you're all dropping in the West as well, because you all signed these agreements, and you resign them every year by the way, at least the guys who you think you elect. They were the ones too, who praised China. China is the model state, by the way, and the UN has said that quite a few times. China is the model state for the world to emulate. I hope you realize that. China is not—we're not either—democratic, but they don't even pretend they're democratic. And we'll read a little story about China when I come back from this break to see how it's to go for you.
Hi folks, we're back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And just talking about China and how it's the model state for the world to emulate and how really it's the darling, as I say, it's the darling of the United Nations. They for instance got a hold of the one child per family policy early on. They ran with it, of course, because you understand the United Nations uses all the Communist tactics, and Quigley himself said that the CFR is often mistaken for Communists. Well, why is that? It's because the goals are the same. In fact they worked with the Communists too. They set them up. And that's another story, of course, with the bankers funding them. Professor Anthony Sutton did a good job on Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, worth having a read. Anyway, here's a story here, from the Mail Online, and there's more too it than meets the eye. And I mean that literally, and I'll explain that after I've read this article. It says:
China forces woman into abortion at EIGHT months for breaching one-child policy
An eight-months pregnant woman was dragged from her home and forced to have an abortion because she had broken China’s one-child-per-family law.
Twelve government officials entered Xiao Aiying’s house where they hit and kicked her in the stomach, before taking her kicking and screaming to hospital.
There, the 36-year-old was restrained as doctors injected her with a drug to kill the unborn baby.
(A: See, that's pure Socialism. And that's where you're going, as you're playing yourselves right now, and it's all happy, that's actually where you're going. You're almost there in fact. Anyway, it says)
Her husband Luo Yanquan, a construction worker, yesterday described the moment officials burst into his family home.
‘They held her hands behind her back and pushed her head against the wall and kicked her in the stomach,’ he said. ‘I don’t know if they were trying to give her a miscarriage.
‘Our ten-year-old daughter has been excited about having a little brother or sister but I don’t know how I can explain to her what has happened.’
He recalled how a month before the child was due to be born officials told the couple they weren’t allowed to have another baby because they already have a daughter.
His wife, who was filmed in hospital with large bruises on her arms and her dead child still inside her, said: ‘I have had this baby, feeling it moving around and around my belly. Can you imagine how I feel now.’
Her harrowing experience in Siming, near the city of Xiamen, south-west China, on October 10, comes a month after the government in Beijing said there would be no relaxation in strict family planning laws.
(A: And that's the lie part, that there's strict family planning laws. It says:)
.
The policy leads to an estimated 13 million abortions every year, with many of those ordered by local authorities. Infanticide is also widespread in many rural areas.
(A: Because they don't want, they can't afford to get kicked up and duffed up and beaten up and fined.)
Those who violate the one child law can be fined up to £25,000.
But two decades of economic boom mean many middle class parents now earn enough to pay the fine to expand their family.
(A: Do you understand, Communism or Socialism, call it what you want, it's all the same thing, New World Order, the War on Terror, it's all the same thing. The Club of Rome, Authoritarianist Societies, it's all the same thing. It's all the same. It's all one. It is all one, you see. And you can have extra children if you can afford it, because obviously it means that you're upper class and middle class. You're up amongst the higher wage earners, therefore you've got better genes, that's how they say it, you see. Remember George Bernard Shaw, and all the rest of these guys, and Wells and so on, all the way down through the founder, or the head CEO of UNESCO, the lovely United Nations educational bunch, that give you all your education for the world. And he said the same thing, that there's no problem understanding there was different classes, different intellects and so on, and the feeble minded shouldn't be allowed to breed, basically, and those at the bottom of the heap. So anyway, it says here:)
For those without cash and connections like the Luos, gruesome summary justice is meted out.
Forced abortions are banned under Chinese law, but this doesn’t prohibit or define late-term abortions.
(A: And even though they say it doesn't prohibit or define, and forced abortions are banned, that's lies, because the guys who brought you the anti-smoking campaigns and worked out the Pavlovian techniques to put it across in public relations marketing propaganda, wrote a book about how successful they were, and they were behind apparently the same technique of creating social disapproval in China. Whereas before they used to always send the militia in to grab a woman who was pregnant with a second child, now the neighbors generally grab you and pull you in, because they make it socially unacceptable, and you can train the public to do anything folks, and that means in any country as well. You better remember that. In any country, as well. Social disapproval. So they can create social approval and social disapproval. And these guys boasted about it, and they had done that for the United Nations. And they were not Chinese. It says:)
The couple fear official retribution after making their ordeal public on a blog.
Ordinary Chinese have expressed disgust at the Luos’ ordeal, labeling the family planning officials ‘cruel’ and ‘inhuman’.
Inhumane, I guess it means. Now, so you get that story and I talk generally about the kaleidoscopic, psychedelic, surrealistic way that news is presented, because right on the right-hand side of the page, now this is an article about something that's going to hit a lot of people in the Western world, when you will find the same thing is going to be implemented here. There's debates going on all the time. I've mentioned them from top professors and the BBC on euthanasia and sterilization forced and all the rest of it. So you better believe it is coming here. It's to be a world agenda, a world agenda. And they used a people who are so used to authoritarianism in their entire history, regardless of what they call themselves, they used that as the big experimental base, and that was China. It's coming everywhere else, very fast, as they push the global warming or cooling or whatever, or high CO2 and you're all eating too much. And they take all the small farms away, as they've been doing for forty-odd years, and the Big Boys are going to ration you, and jack up all their prices at the same time, so they'll really lose nothing.
Here's all the articles on the right side of this page here, you see. Femail Today. And it's got a story about Michael Douglas and his cancer treatment; and then Cheryl Lloyd becomes victim of malicious youtube hate campaign, so that the X-factor contestant is accused of being a bully or something; David Williams; Laura Stone's Calvin Klein jeans banned in Australia for being suggestive of rape; I think I'm having a boy says Abbie Clancy. Now this is next to something that really should make your hair stand up on end. Can you imagine your government bursting into your house and dragging off your wife, eight months pregnant, after beating her up? And there's nothing you can do about it. There's no counter suit, or nothing like that. Nothing. And then you read down again, and then, strictly too low cut, Ashley Dixon flashes her cleavage on stage at Britain's next top, blah, blah, blah. This is the trivia that accompanies this, and that's there on purpose folks. That's all there on purpose, that these particular, sexy type articles are all there next to this main story. And you've been watching this kind of stuff your whole life, and having no idea that it puts you into a schizoid attitude towards the article I've just read. Almost neutral, you see. You're being trained. You're being trained your whole life long, and you don't know it.
You can always, as I say, when something's exposed, it's often used as a cover, even the exposure itself. And there's one article about David Kelly. Now David Kelly was found, supposedly suicided in a forest, and he was going to testify in one of the largest, the biggest and highest inquiries in Britain to do with Tony Blair and the War on Terror, and the War Against Iraq. A top man, a scientist himself, a UN weapons inspector as well, but he'd also worked with Israel for Britain on various bacterial and viral warfare projects. This guy was high up there. And of course, nothing made sense at the time with the official story. Official stories always stink, even the latest one they've given out on 7/7, where they still can't get the trains right that these guys supposedly got on, even though the trains were all late, and some of them were even canceled apparently. Anyway, what does fact have to do with stories? This says:
David Kelly:(A: And then it says:) conspiracy theories
(A: Right off the bat. Now, when you see conspiracy theories, see, the New Age used to have their big, big meetings all over the place. They'd talk about conspiracies and stuff, mixed with the New Age, and the light coming in from the cosmos, and we'd all wake up and yadda-ya. And they'd sell their crystals or whatever was the in-thing at that time. And it was a kind of circus. And now you even have Patriot Circuses that are similar, with the same kind of people involved in it. All kind of New Agey as well, but they'll listen to the factual stuff as well, but they like the fascinating stuff too. So, conspiracy theory, you see, has been labeled and pushed on them from the top, from the top down, authorized from the top. They call them conspiracy theories and eventually it will be kind of like a lunatic. So anyway, conspiracy theories here.)
Conspiracy theorists believe that Dr David Kelly, who was found dead after being identified as the leak who criticized the claim that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction that could be fired in 45 minutes, did not kill himself.
Then it gives some examples of conspiracy theories, you see. Now believe you me, if it was something on a different topic that they wanted you to think otherwise about, they'd say Doubting Thomas, or something like that, but they would not say conspiracy theorists. Or official story makes no sense, that would be the headline. Anyway, it says here, because they've just announced again, after another, another inquiry into this, you see, a more official story that makes as much sense as the first story, which is no sense at all. And it says, why did the detective, and it goes through all the different points and so on, about the cut wrists and why did he cut this wrist, and the last inquiry said that these cuts wouldn't have killed him anyway. They might have changed their mind again and said, well they did. And so on, and so on, and so on, and why they put a 70-year ban into the release of post-mortem examination documents. So, why would they use conspiracy theories for that?
Conspiracy theories. It's like a movement, you see, conspiracy theories today is a movement. It's like the UFO cults in the '60s and '70s and the big events that they had for people who would travel to different countries for meetings, especially in the States, and buy all their badges and all their little alien dolls and that, and they'd buy everything. It was like a big extravaganza. They enjoyed it, and that was their thing at the time. That was a religion for them. And now it's conspiracy theories. And unfortunately with conspiracy theories, when you mention the facts, the facts from their own books at the top, and their own documentation from the top, or the United Nations documentation from the top, and those who set up the documentation for the United Nations from the top, you're now lumped in as a conspiracy theorist. Because, you'll find that other people are put out there deliberately, and that's what's called counter intelligence, to grab the stuff that's circulating that's dangerous, say it all, get well funded into popularity, and then they spin it off into outer space or something like that, or it's the aliens. You know what I mean. That's how they do it.
Now, everyone's heard now about the group who put out so much of the fake hockey stick, climate change graphs, and that was the University of East Anglia, and they're still at it, by the way, in other ways too. Of course, you didn't know that they also had another organization attached to this, because you see this whole weather scam isn't to do with just depopulation, mandatory sterilization, it's also to do, as I say, with the restriction of food. They've been on about this for years. Years. They put out articles over the past, many, many articles over how much grass it takes to feed a cow, or a beef bull, or whatever, or make cheese, and so on. It's bad for the environment, because you see, you have all to go vegetarian, totally eventually. Eventually. You know, Hitler was vegetarian as well. You know Benjamin Franklin became one too. They all had one thing in common; they belonged to a particular society. Anyway, it says here, Mail Online:
No more beef and cheese: Go vegetarian, by order of Government food police
(A: Now, this is how it's presented in the paper, right. It's the Mail Online. And it says:)
Wholesale changes to the nation’s diet, with a move towards vegetarian food and away from beef and cheese, have been recommended by Government advisers.
(A: Sounds very official, doesn't it? It says:)
A report commissioned by the Food Standards Agency (A: That's very official. That's very important.) suggests radical changes to what we eat and even how we cook.
These include eating more seasonal produce to reduce transportation and switching to microwave ovens and pressure cookers to use less energy in preparing food.
Out would go beef, cheese, sugary foods and drinks such as tea, coffee and cocoa. In would come vegetables and pulses, together with yoghurt.
The FSA says the switch is necessary as part of a move to a diet that is low in greenhouse gases (GHG), which are associated with climate change.
(A: Really? They haven't even proven it.)
The report, compiled by a team from (A: Guess where.) the University of East Anglia,
(A: The ones that were getting all the millions of dollars in grants to give you the fake science data on climate change. Same bunch. And just before I move from this article, to show you how the cons work, and propaganda, which is now called public relations, which is a science of your mind and how to control you and make you want things or change your mind about things, go into Bernays, and the writings of Bernays. Now he wasn't the top guy, believe you me, someone taught Bernays, and it wasn't Uncle Freud. It was way bigger than Uncle Freud, and older too. And Bernays would start up, if you wanted something to sell for a drug line, for instance, he would set up his own version of a Food and Drug Administration. In fact, that's where they got the idea from. So he had the American Institute of Blah, Blah, Blah, you see. And then he would have it in the ad, the Institute of So and So of America has suggested that, blah, blah, blah, and people would fall for it. And they're still using the same techniques today. So here is this FSA, you see, the Food Standards Agency, which is what? It's a branch of a University of East Anglia on climate change. Sounds awfully official. It's like American Express, isn't it? Or Fed-Ex. Anyway, it says:)
The university was at the centre of allegations last year that it had manipulated climate change data to magnify the problem.
(A: And get their massive grants, because that's all they live on, is massive grants. Before that they couldn't get a job as weather reporters on television stations, there was that many of them. So nobody was going into it. Make it popular and a crisis situation, and you turn to the experts and Super-Man emerges, lots of Super-Men, all on big grants, you see. And they've got to churn out scary data, to keep the grants coming in. And they can't let it die off, because it's a big part of the agenda, to control the world, you see. And if it dies off, they'll lose all their big, we'll even stop watching the weather program, won't we. And then they're out of work. And they're living high on the hog right now. Anyway, it says:)
Its report, called Food and Climate Change, will be controversial given that many people may baulk at being told what they should eat in order to meet greenhouse gas reduction targets.
It says here. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, we're back, and we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Just showing you how things are presented and how you're supposed to feel about something. Most folk do feel things eventually, as I say, but they're mixed up with the articles on the other side of the main topics, until the main topic becomes blurred and sometimes the horror is removed from it, and it's mixed with a strange thing of sex or violence or something like that. This is all a psychological technique, you know. And it causes a form of disassociation, so when the real things are happening to real people near you, they won't bother you either. And that's how it works. It conditions you. Many ways to condition you. Now, I'm going to put an article up too. I'll put all these links up on cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the show. I'm going to put a link up too, to this, the head of the EU Parliament. It's so amazing, you can't call it a Parliament, really, it's not democratic, the EU, the New Soviet System, but it says here:
Barroso admits to being ‘elected by secret vote’
(A: You see, nothing democratic about secret votes. Mind you, all British Commonwealth countries and Britain too, have the same kind of things that go on in secret votes. They even have a privy council, which is a private council where members and tycoons from big business are allowed in, and the rest of the politicians are kept out, and they don't even tell the public who attended and so on, so then these private votes and things. Democracy, eh? Anyway, it says here:)
In a speech about the latest EU plan to impose a new EU tax, Nigel Farage reminded the ‘unelected’ president of the EU, (A: And he's unelected.) Barroso, that this was not “EU” money, but our (UK) money. (A: So Barroso lost his rag eventually, because of the barrage from Farage, and it says, he basically got up and says:) “I WAS elected in a secret vote”.
He admitted to it. So you'll see it here on the video, as well, if you want to see how modern democracy works. And you see, it's all going to an agenda. I don't even give it the time of day when people say democracy and we need democracy, etc. It's a farce. It was always a farce. And if people thought that the bigwigs from the past ever intended to give up anything, or their power, to the mob, well you live on some strange planet where Hollywood really has had an effect on your brain. Of course the BBC does too. They don't need Hollywood for that. The BBC does a darn good job of it, itself. And CBC is the same for Canada. Tremendous job of propaganda. And of course updating for political correctness. That's what it gets paid for, from the taxpayer. We don't pay them directly. Don't want to. We're not asked, it's taken from your checks to pay them, because it's government owned, like the BBC.
And for the wonderful system of health care that's to be international, and the U.S. is to get a taste of it shortly. Here's an article from Britain, where you get the minimal health care according to the World Health Organization.
Six-month delay by NHS cost woman a cancer lifeline after tumours grew too big
(A: When she was waiting, you see. Six months.)
A breast cancer patient waited six months for the NHS to deal with her application for life-prolonging treatment - during which time her tumours grew too big to receive the therapy.
Suzanne Lloyd wanted her health trust to fund pioneering treatment that promised to extend her life by two years.
Three consultants made a formal request to NHS managers for the Selective Internal Radiation Therapy in February.
But it took until the end of July for her primary care trust to turn down her request, saying the £23,000 treatment was too expensive.
During that time her tumours developed to such an extent that she cannot have the SIRT.
You see, everything works on who you are in true banker-run Socialism. From Hamish and myself, in Ontario, Canada, it's Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
Topics of
show covered in following links:
China, the United Nations Darling Model State forces
Abortion at 8 Months of Pregnancy
Telegraph Hits Back at now "Official Ruling on
David Kelly---Suicide"
Scammers from East Anglia University (the Hockey Graph
Crew) Want Britain to go Vegetarian
Barroso Admits Being Elected by Secret Commission
Britain, Socialism, Austerity and Your Value to
Society Will Determine Your Medical Treatment---Or Not
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||