ALAN WATT    BLURB (i.e. Educational Talk):

"BOFFINS, BLIMPS AND BS"

January 25, 2007

Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – January 25, 2007 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)

WWW.CUTTINGTHROUGHTHEMATRIX.COM

www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu

Hi.  This is Alan Watt at cuttingthroughthematrix.com and today it is January 25, 2007.

I'll kick off tonight with a news article from the Athens News – Athens, Ohio, that is. This was an article written by James Renner of the Cleveland Free Times. I guess that's a group, a syndicated group, on the 30th of the 5th 2006.

"Last week a fire ignited at the Akron Airdock that once housed a fleet of Goodyear blimps. Firemen rushed to the 211-foot-tall structure and quickly doused the flames. Reporters and photographers descended on the landmark. Many were surprised to learn the blimps were no longer being stored there.

Turns out Lockheed Martin -- the company that gave us the Trident intercontinental ballistic missile -- was renovating the site for an upcoming project when the fire started. It's being turned into a hangar for a prototype airship. If you're frightened of this administration's habit of spying on American citizens, you may want to stop reading.  The prototype is called the High Altitude Airship, or HAA…"

Alan:  Which is kind of a laugh, isn't it?  If you put the "A" in front of the "H," you have another behind it, so you've got "AHAA" and that was one of Aleister Crowley's old magic terms that he used.

"Lockheed Martin Maritime Systems & Sensors in Akron won the $40 million contract from the Missile Defense Agency to build HAA in 2003. It is essentially another blimp. A giant one.  Seventeen times the size of the Goodyear dirigible. It's designed to float 12 miles above the earth, far above planes and weather systems. It will be powered by solar energy, and will stay in a geocentric orbit for up to a year, undetectable by ground-based radar. You can't see it from the ground. But it can see you.  "The possibilities are endless for homeland security," says Kate Dunlap, a Lockheed Martin spokesperson. "It could house cameras, and other surveillance equipment. It would be an eye in the sky."

"Eye In The Sky"

By Alan Parsons

Don't think sorry's easily said
Don't try turning tables instead
You've taken lots of chances before
But I ain't gonna give any more
Don't ask me
That's how it goes
'Cause part of me knows what you're thinking...

Don't say words you're gonna regret
Don't let the fire rush to your head
I've heard the accusation before
And I ain't gonna take any more
Believe me
The sun in your eyes
Made some of the lies worth believing

CHORUS
I am the eye in the sky
Looking at you
I can read your mind
I am the maker of rules
Dealing with fools
I can cheat you blind
And I don't need to see any more
To know that I can read your mind, I can read your mind
I can read your mind

Don't leave false illusions behind
Don't cry, I ain't changing my mind
So find another fool like before
'Cause I ain't gonna live anymore believing
Some of the lies while all of the signs are deceiving

CHORUS
I am the eye in the sky
Looking at you
I can read your mind
I am the maker of rules
Dealing with fools
I can cheat you blind
And I don't need to see any more
To know that I can read your mind, I can read your mind
I can read your mind

            "According to a summary released by the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command, the HAA can watch over a circle of countryside 600 miles in diameter. That's everything between Toledo and New York City. And they want to build 11."

Alan:  Oh, 11.  They love the number 11 – Jachin and Boaz again.

            "With high-res cameras, that could mean constant surveillance of every square inch of American soil.  "If you had a fleet of them, this could be used for border surveillance," suggests Dunlap.  The Launch date is 2009."

Alan:  And it's added on to the end of this little article here.

            "Of course, mimicking its defense of warrantless wiretapping and phone-log data mining, the government maintains it only wants to protect its citizens from external threats. But as any geek can tell you, blimps were ubiquitous in The Watchmen, the seminal '80's graphic novel in which heroes have been driven underground and Nixon is still president.  Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not watching you.

Alan:  And so there you have that part of it, the "eye in the sky."  It's nice to know you're being taken care of so well and they're so concerned about us all, isn't it?  And all those old folk songs about little things, the dalliances that happened in haystacks in the countryside, will no longer be relevant anymore. You'd have to be inside the haystack; so we're all being watched and monitored.

This is really old stuff, very old stuff.  I can remember Bill Cooper when he did his article on Area 51, he did actually a video on Area 51, where you could watch all these airships – there was UFO types, flying saucers.  It's an Air Force testing base for advanced aircraft and that's where all your UFOs have been coming out of, now they have them all over the world actually, and he did photograph this huge cigar-shaped object coming out of a cloud 20 miles away with a huge telephoto lens and it was very possible that was one of these prototype "eye in the sky" airships.  And we always did say these politicians are full of gas. Well, now we know. Now we know where it's all going – at least it's going to a good cause.

It's a pity they couldn't attach themselves to these balloons and go up in them and just keep pumping the gas in. That's another method of getting high and these characters do like getting high, from all the reports we get about politicians.  Any fool can tell this has nothing to do with border security. It's nothing to do with Arab terrorists.  It's to do with a world that's coming into view, a planned world, the multicultural world which they wrote about so long ago.  The "omelet" that Mr. Rockefeller talked about saying, "you can't help breaking eggs to make the omelet." There will be chaos for a while, according to their plans, and they've been preparing to deal with this chaos for many, many years and as I've said so many times, they have no favorites when it comes to the peasant of one country or the peasant of another. 

The ELITE are a club unto themselves and the mayhem that will be caused when cultures clash, as they unfortunately will do. That's the history of the world. The ancients used this system over and over. We know that even before the Romans the various demagogues of Persia and other countries moved whole populations from their homelands to other places far, far away and sometimes brought them back generations later. It was a different people almost and we're watching the same techniques occur again and when they want to cause conflict they simply put in racial types with completely diverse cultures, who can get along when there's enough money and work; but when they cause big inflation, when the jobs begin to disappear, people retreat to their cultures and then start pointing the traditional fingers at the traditional enemies and we know what happens. It's just the story of history and it's also an art form, a technique that's used and always has been used by the global elite.  It's taught even in some of the higher courses of the military at the very top.  Nothing new under the sun.

We know the foundations have been funding all the Latin American groups who are pushing for what they think is going to be the new freedom as they move into what was or is American territory and the old histories are rehashed and how they can reclaim it.  They'll never figure out themselves, it doesn't matter who claims to be in control, since the leaders are all part of one club, they will not benefit. The average person who ends up causing the fighting and so on will not benefit from this at all. 

More and more people will move as they have been from the southern states and go north. Many have moved abroad in fact in anticipation of all this and since this is a mandate, it's not debatable, it's a mandate, it's a plan, there's no complaints department anywhere. All the young politicians who come into federal status understand this right off the bat to "toe the line" as they say in Masonry.  They don't ask questions. They know it's the agenda or they catch on quickly and they parrot all the right things to say. They will not turn back.  This is a mandate above politics, beyond politics, for those who own the world and they only own it because we believe they own it because we believe in money and through debt et cetera they do own it.

You never borrow. If you do, you're in debt. The debt is a slave to the debtor. That's old ancient history.

There we are with the net – the net that's being spread out over the world by the fishers of men over a very, very long period and what you're seeing under the guises of nonsense and farce actually. It's so ridiculously stupid. At least the excuses we are given are ridiculously stupid and infantile, but that tells you how much they think of the public. YOU'RE WATCHING THE TOTALITARIAN SYSTEM AS THEY PULL THE DRAWSTRINGS OF THE NET and the mayhem which will ensue for a while, which is predicted to last maybe three, four generations until a new culture comes out of it.  However, it won't stop there because they are already planning to do other things with society such as the chip, the brain chip, and creating new types of life forms as well.

WE ARE HERE TO SERVE A SYSTEM. That should be self-evident by the fact that every parent has to send by law their child to school. I know there are some holdouts in the U.S. who still home school, but even they are being encroached upon and forced to teach the same things that are being taught in the public school system.  When you're mandated to go to school and you're born free, sovereign, well it doesn't jive, does it?  Your either free or you're not free, one of the two; and looking at the definitions of a citizen, it's someone who was born with preexisting duties to the State, some say to serve the State. 

In the Council on Foreign Relations reports (the American Branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs), they wrote exceedingly about this topic where the world they're bringing in is where everyone will be proud to serve the state. That will be their duty, their sole duty actually. What you have is a dominant minority at the top where the keepers of the wisdom of the ages, the knowledge of the ages – the keepers of the financial system at the top. They have a scientific group, "technocrats" as Brzezinski calls them, who will take care of the system for them, especially the one that's coming into view. It's more technical orientated and they have their various bureaucracies beneath that in the structure to give us a form at this phase of the game of communistic rule over the people.  In fact, from the bureaucracies down, it's a copy of the communist or Soviet system.

There's some debate which came first, the British system of socialism or the Soviet system, and of course even some of the communists at the top said (I think Khrushchev said it) that "communism was just socialism in a hurry," and that's true.  You use rebellion and revolution to hurry things up. We are going through a REVOLUTION at the moment.  Revolutions in the past were never headed by ordinary people. The revolutions of the present are not done so either.

The people in the revolutions in France, who took two generations to build it up to the proper pitch of fervor and they used the middle class to do it in France. The French Revolution, while under its many words of equality and fraternity and so on, was really a middle class revolution to usurp power that was held by an oligarchy and spread the wealth amongst themselves. In America it's odd because their definition of "working class" is a bit different from most countries and "middle class." 

A "middle class" in Europe traditionally were suit-and-tie employees, people who didn't dirty their hands in any kind of manual work whatsoever. Some of them at one time earning less than some of the higher paid factory workers at a certain point in history when they had factories.  However, in the U.S. it's done by their income, so you had people who could work in factories who count themselves as "middle class."  When I'm talking about the middle classes and the revolution of France, I'm referring to the learned elite of France, many of whom were not French at all. They'd come from Switzerland, which has always been a training base for the revolutions.

It's odd if you go into the history of Switzerland how cantons were formed from different countries to give you German, Italian, French and so on speaking areas, that somehow always could live harmoniously because the bankers at the top made it so; while the same bankers who funded other countries made it impossible for other peoples to live together.  They gave the writers of the Geneva Bible the right to live in Switzerland. They were on the run from the authorities in England and other countries and they were Rosicrucian Freemasons. After that, other rebels fighting against monarchies went to Switzerland, where they were always given asylum there and generally trained to be better at what they were going to do in the future. It was to get sent back home and stir up the people, who would always follow if you tell them you're doing it for them and how wealthy they're going to be and happy and all the rest of it.  The same kind of stuff you hear in presidential speeches today – promises, promises. Yet, the French Revolution was a really good example of Freemasonic revolution. The United States was the same but they've managed to hide a lot since, through rewriting and writing out of different Masonic incidents and peoples in the history. They've had it scrubbed clean and now they have a sort of Hollywood version.

France tended to leave it as it was and made no bones about it that they set up the coffee houses for discussions (and these were Masonic clubs) to get the whole thing going.  The bankers funded the top writers of the day to say all the right things and stir the people up.  Down through time, as they recruit Masons, they still tell them that they were behind the revolutions and it was for the ordinary people and how good things were going to be; and they're still doing the same I'm sure in the lodges.

It isn't until you stand back and say wait a minute here, there's a minority dictating the future always under the guises of helping other people, especially the masses and getting the masses to go along with it. Sometimes having bloody revolutions, other times having bloodless ones. They've had the sexual revolution. Many different kinds of revolutions and the sexual revolution, it's interesting they even brought unisex into it – "One sex." That's what unisex fashion means, and the males and the females all dressed the same with the same jeans and shirts and all the rest of it. Unisex fashions to blur the distinction between male and female, which was part of "The Communist Manifesto," the expanded version, not just the 10 planks. You should read it sometime.

When I was small, I used to be amazed looking at the Chinese, the Communist Chinese they would occasionally show on television, who were all given the same blue tunics and jeans to wear because there was to be no class distinction, no sexual distinction between male and female, so they all walked around with these pajamas on that were blue.  That was at the same time as they were doing the same thing in Europe with the hippie movements and so on wearing the blue jeans. The guys got their hair long and from behind often you couldn't tell if it was male or female. The same thing was being done, exactly the same thing, without explaining it to the people who thought it was just their thing, their fashion, their generation's fashion. They never questioned where the fashion came from and they didn't know the FASHION industry is tied into the ENTERTAINMENT industry, which is tied into the CULTURAL CREATION industry. This is an old, old, old science.

At least in, say, Soviet countries, the people knew they were slaves. They just didn't talk about it but they knew it. When you're made to think you're free yet you're still adopting all the Soviet policies without the term "communism" ever being used, it will never dawn on most people unless you really point it out to them.  Even then, they're in shock if they do understand what you're telling them. Most can't.  They think we're just stumbling, evolving along through the darkness and things appear spontaneously into the fashion industry and so on, and scientists are really, really just working on what they tell us they're working on and they don't know all the answers yet about things, and that they get the latest things that are invented, they just appear on the shelves.

The same people never even noticed the transfer of factories to China. They dream their lives through; they're in a form of somnambulism and they have no memory of the past. The children are taught not to even listen to the older people. They're past it. That's why you have no movies or programs now about older people. It's all about young people and that's to give the impression that once you're past a certain age that you have no purpose. Well, you're obsolete, just like your computers and things.  Anything old is obsolete.  Everything new is good. Simple as that. This is a technique that's used.

Even when I was small we kept getting reruns from the U.S. of old black and white movies. You would see actors in their 40's and 50's quite commonly as the main type of hero characters. You don't see that today because it's a youth orientated culture. Not because the youth picked it for themselves, but because those who direct society in the culture creation industry make it so.

At one time it was a pleasure to listen to the elderly, the ones with wisdom, and they did have them in those days, to just hear how they had lived and been brought up because what happened in the past can be reintroduced at any time.  Most people today couldn't put up with what we think of as hardship of any kind.  Most people in fact would die psychologically if they had to live like their great grandparents did, yet you get all these snippets of information and you could certainly tie the past in because living history—those who lived through the history—are the best reporters on it.  Not the authorized ones that you end up reading in school.

HISTORY IS ALWAYS SCRUBBED CLEAN UNTIL THEY HAVE THEIR PERFECTED VERSION WHICH BECOMES THE AUTHORIZED STANDARD VERSION and you're left with dates and places and what they say is wars over territory, and who benefits from all of this?

Who benefits from all the wars?  Who funds the wars?  Which body – which international body set up the treaties to allow bankers to fund all sides and bring in laws so that whoever lost still had to pay what they owed after they lost?

It came out with the Falklands little war, Margaret Thatcher's little war.  This is the woman who said her greatest hero was Winston Churchill and she'd love to emulate him by leading Britain through a war.  This was her fantasy. What a fantasy to have, for a male or a female, but this is supposedly – I don't know if she was really a woman.  I still wonder about that.  They called her "The Iron Lady."  They gave her the little Falklands War, a real little war, just to keep her happy, I think, and she certainly wouldn't have got a next term if it hadn't been for that war. She would have been out.  However, it turned out that Britain had actually given or sold to Argentina most of the ships before the war started (not long before the war started) and the Argentineans were paying it up, kind of like a hire-purchase deal, and after the war was over and Britain had sunk the ships (which were technically theirs), Argentina still had to divvy-up all the money that they owed for the warships they got from England which England eventually sunk.

How come the bankers never lose?  How come defeated countries must still pay up?  Who sets all these rules?  What's the common link between them all? 

You'll find it's done through major treaties. Treaties which are not discussed in parliament buildings or congressional halls, just simply signed into law and they have Gentlemen's Agreements which are written into law and THEY are all FREEMASONS on all sides who bring this about and that's why the BANKERS NEVER LOSE and that's why they fund every side.  Yet the bankers themselves stand apart from all peoples on the planet because they're so interbred that it's scary.  They're so interbred. So much so, it's kind of like animals.  If you have pedigree Labradors and you interbred them, you're pretty well guaranteed to have the same type, same temperament and so on. 

In humans when we marry "in common," we're commoners you see, you can raise a boy or a girl and you really have no say in the personality outcome and he can go off in any direction regardless of what mom or dad works at, but when you look at the banking families they're pretty well guaranteed to stay banking families. Very weird.  They don't say, I'm going off to be an engineer, dad, or I want to be a physicist.  The only exception I think was Victor Rothschild who was a scientist and again the odd thing about the Rothschild's if you go into their history being economists – see, they were also economists like Malthus who looked upon the "human herd" as they called it and long production could go on in certain areas and they would look at what would happen after those industries would go, including the social mayhem.  They used think tanks to do this, but they also had as I say "archives of histories."  They understood this stuff. They were economists and bankers. THEY PLAN THE FUTURE. The economists must do that for a dominant minority.

What's interesting with the Rothschild's is if you look into their histories you'll see that they had a fascination with diseases and some of the Rothschild's in the early 1900's, late 1800's, some of the children had written books on how disease was transmitted by parasites.  Well, why would bankers and bankers' offspring be fascinated by this? 

Then we find later Victor Rothschild who became the head of all British intelligence at one point after he was a main suspect for passing information onto the communists.  He was also a scientist who worked at Porton Downs warfare laboratories where some of the best – Britain makes some of the best bacterium and viruses on the planet. That was his job there.  They have a fascination with that which also kills people.  If they had to breed you up, I'm sure they would use genetics to speed up the process.  It's a form of "herd management."  You cull off at times and you increase in others.  That's part of how you maintain control over the world, especially when you're planning it all. You plan the future.

In ancient Greece because they lived primarily on islands, they sometimes arranged wars at the top to bring down the populations and once again they benefited from it, those who invested because they had investment too. They had international bankers in those days as well, who would loan to them, and if you were very, very good and you brought masses of profit their way, the bankers would actually allow you to marry into the family.  The early BROTHERHOOD SYSTEM which still MAINTAINS ITSELF TODAY, if you're tremendously good to them, this little clique, this very small, small clique will bring you into their family and your genes will be raised to godhood, at least your offspring, and that's how it runs itself.  That's how it works.

Looking back at, as a for instance, many of the reports from the American Psychological Association, you can see how this ties in; psychology and psychiatry at the higher levels being tied in with the control of populations, mind control.  We know this because even Coronation Street in England, the longest running gossip drama ever created, shapes the culture of Britain by showing in advance what you're going to see and how you would behave and react as the actors do in predictive programming. They employ psychiatrists and psychologists and all kinds of experts for the series and they showed this on television, knowing the public mimic what they see and behave the same way.  In many of the reports of these associations, in their own publications, their magazines and books, they've mentioned the need to use these sciences more so on the public without the public being aware of them. 

We find the same thing written about by Bertrand Russell in his book "The Impact of Science on Society" and we also find it in Brzezinski's books and you go far back as even old Blavatsky who said "a method of control over the minds of the public would be used – the biggest weapon ever invented" and she wrote that or at least supposedly wrote it in the 1800's. 

Sciences are used to guide and manipulate and direct the world, so much so, that very few people have an original opinion of their own.  They all think they're sane, especially when they can bounce these opinions off their neighbors who've gone through the same conditioning and will have the same answers.  That's how sanity today is judged.  You could have a whole population that's insane and believes that they're living in the top of a pyramid and that's the earth. If they're all taught that they'd all believe it and if you said, no, the earth is round, they'd lock you up.  Therefore, if you have a different opinion from everybody else, be proud of the fact.  It means you've broken out.

Getting back to these associations of psychiatry and psychology, that's the science really that's employed upon the people in co-operation with script writers, novel writers, movie writers and directors. All of these techniques are used of the mind, psychology and psychiatry, to get us to emulate what we see, to give us the opinions we're all supposed to have. They can even change the opinions half-way through and everyone will suddenly parrot the new opinion without noticing the change over it's done so slickly.  It's also easier do to on a population who's been conditioned from childhood with these techniques of downloading.  It doesn't take much to reprogram them in a different direction.

However, these associations of psychiatry and psychology have also talked about for many years the need to monitor every individual since everybody—every individual—is a potential criminal. Every individual has the ability to do right or wrong.  Again, the classifications vary and the definitions vary on the era and the period and the function of society.  However, when it comes to abuse and violence et cetera, sure, everyone does have that ability, but you do find most people will check themselves from using it.  The world they're creating, since they don't believe anyone can be trusted to monitor themselves and direct themselves, this world they're creating is to be a totally guided and monitored society. Monitored by experts until eventually you have the chip and this ties in with the war on terror. 

Never in history have they given us a term like this.  They've always been able to paint someone as a demon and dehumanize them through propaganda and have us go at them.  This war on terror is so ambiguous. It's meant to be so because going back to psychiatry and psychology and their definitions say everyone is a potential terrorist and since abuse, violence of any kind and even crime is coming under, is falling under now—in fact, many of it already is, many of these subjects are already under it—under the guise of terror. 

You can be a financial terrorist, for instance, for withholding taxes and I know that for a fact because I know someone in the U.S. who had gone and followed one of these shortwave "gold and silver" fellows who said you don't have to pay your taxes to the federal government, it's all illegal, yah-de-yah-de-yah; and technically they're right because they didn't make amendments to bring in the Federal Reserve in any lawful manner and so on and so on.  However, they followed this advice and sure enough, they had demands from the federal government to pay their taxes, just ignored them, found the loopholes, wrote back and told them why they shouldn't. They were kind of left alone, although they kept getting demands, but when the woman was going on a holiday within the United States she was stopped at the airport and she was held for a while and when she asked why, her name was down as a financial terrorist for withholding taxes.

We see that everything now is coming under terrorism, everything, and that's why it's called the war on terror.  Although it's a war of terror in actual fact. It's been broadened to include everything: right-think, wrong-think, double-think, all of the different kinds of Orwellian thinking, which is a good exercise in understanding, that is to read George Orwell's "1984."  The movies are excellent or the British movie is excellent with John Hurt and Richard Burton, but it's even better to read the book to get the actual definitions, the in-depth definitions of right-think and double-think and so on.  These are sciences.

Orwell wasn't just picking these terms out of the air.  Orwell was picked, or Blair his real name was. He was picked to work for this elite so he understood the process.  He understood the techniques and he'd been groomed for it – it was in school, picked at school. Just like today, they pick the CIA and all the other secret services from school.  They did the same thing in England and Blair was picked up at Cambridge University and trained to go out and fight for a form of world socialism, until he clued in that the guys who ran the socialist side and the communist side were also the same bankers that ran the so-called right wings as well.

After working at the BBC as a propagandist and he said himself in his memoirs that his job was to convince the British housewife that these cheap rationed little cuts of meat – the stuff that they used to throw away, it's awful.  I think they called it "offal" because it was awful, if you check the spellings. His job was to convince them that it was actually better for you and he wrote about that. He didn't like what he had to do but he showed you how this technique is used and that was through the BBC, one of the best propagandists ever invented, in conjunction of course with Tavistock and various other professors. That's how they run society.

For those that think I've been hard on the young guys who have been brought up playing all the video games, who like their uniforms and want to go off and do their bit, especially the Air Force (they're the really brave ones), I thought I should really have a change of heart here and finish off the night with something just for them. After all, they just want to help, don't they?  They want to make the world a better place to live in.

For me, it's good night and may your god go with you.  This song is my little bit for this war on terror.  Bye for now.

"Air Farce"

By Covenant With Life

Hello. Have you ever wondered if you have what it takes to be the best of the best of the best?  One of the few and proud. One of the determinedly stupid. You're 17 and thinking about college, right? 

After spending most of your young life playing video games, did you ever wonder how you could translate that into an amazing salary and kill real people too?

Well, wonder no longer because in today's Air Farce we don't face the enemy mono el mono.  We hide from him at 50,000 feet and carpet bomb the shit out of him until every old man, woman and child is dismembered and spread out over the entire area.

Did you know that the most destructive battle mission ever waged was from an Air Farce bomber?  That's right kids. Enola Gay dropped a single bomb that killed an entire city of non-combatants entirely filled with old folks just like your grandparents and helpless children.

We at the Air Farce don't cut ears off to prove our kills like those pussy vets in Nam did.  We do our killings wholesale just like you learned to do in video games. That's right. You can be a top gun, a real man.  In fact, we are counting on and hoping that you've wasted years of your precious lives doing nothing but sitting in front of a TV with a joystick in your hand.

Have you ever wondered if you were the kind of man who could sentence to death someone you would never see?  Do you like shiny medals and think sharp-looking uniforms with shiny pieces of tin somehow make you a better person inside?

Well, we hope so.  We really do, because if you believe that, then you have what it takes to be a chemtrail pilot. We'll train you using taxpayer money. We'll fill your head with stupid slogans. We'll convince you we are your real family that will never betray you and that until you joined us you weren't really living at all. 

That's right. At the Air Farce we keep you so confused that you won't mind one day spraying the dickens out of your own family and friends, all from a safe and anonymous altitude, just like when you are fire bombing some rice paddy overseas. The great part is you won't even have to leave the states. You can kill right here in America.

We're the Air Farce and we're looking for the best of the best of the best. Join us and become a chemtrail pilot today.

(Transcribed by Linda)