Nov. 8, 2011 (#958)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Nov. 8, 2011:
Perception Management Creates Highs
Normalizing Killers into "Good Guys":
"The Cancerous Spread and Militarization of
Has Turned the American Eagle into a Vulture,
SWAT Teams Killing Innocents is Now "Pretty Cool",
"Just Like the Movies" says Idiocracy's Fool,
Slaughtering People in Homes Like Mafia Once Did,
Many Mistaken Addresses Kept Under the Lid,
Trained by Military to Kill the "Others",
Excepting Their Fraternity and Masonic Brothers,
We've Seen What They're For, In Chile, El Salvador,
Big Killing Coming, The Idiocracy'll Cry "More!" "
© Alan Watt Nov. 8, 2011
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Nov. 8, 2011 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on November the 8th 2011. For newcomers, you should always make use of cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site. Thereís hundreds and hundreds of audios to download, one at a time hopefully, and listen to them, if you can stand them, because itís not nice stuff. Itís about the reality behind this system. And if you can get your way through it, work your way through it, youíll find out how the big organizations all work together, network together, they even have special units to integrate them on their outer edges so theyíre all on board with one big agenda at the same time across the whole planet. This is what youíre up against, massive money, the big private banks, massive private banks and bankers and their foundations, again, the so-called charitable foundations that run organizations, all under the umbrella groups of the United Nations, and how they literally create the policies, the social culture and so on, to be taught to children through school, and they run our world for us. They give us our present reality Ė they planned that a long time ago Ė and theyíve already planned, the youngsters who are born right now, their future reality as well. So nothing is just stumbling along through time. The world isnít like that. The world is guided down through time by those who are always in control of it. So I try and show you how it all pulls together and creates pretty well all, ALL of your reality, even the things that you like, dislike and the organizations that you might belong to. And they can predict you, personally, down to a fraction, a fraction of one percent of predictability. Every single person pretty well on the planet they have analyzed to the nth degree.
So help yourself to the audios. Find out how it all works, where itís going, why it exists in the first place, how it came into being and where it plans to go. Because thereís no surprises at all, itís quite boring reading news. The only reason I do it is to show you how it links in with what so-and-so said maybe 50 years ago at some international meeting. Because literally nothing, nothing is news at all, itís all planned that way. Youíre living through one big script written a long, long time ago.
Remember too, that you are the audience that bring me to you. I donít bring on the advertisers. I donít have shares in advertisers. I donít have partial ownership, either, in private advertisers or what they sell. So itís up to you, the people who listen, to help me keep going by buying the books and disks that I have for sale at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. Thatís all Iím after really. Iím not creating a big business here or an empire. I hope that you just want to hear the basic facts and then go and search it out for yourself and verify it, or deny it; whatever you want to do, itís up to you. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember, straight donations are really welcome as well, because some weeks thereís hardly any orders at all and I depend upon the occasional donation to make it through to the month.
Now what I do here is chronicle what happens, tell you why itís happening. In other words, I add to the media articles the parts that they miss out for you, deliberately of course, because everything is perception management. You come to rationalize your reality by the information thatís fed to you. All you have to do is omit half, or even less than that, of a story and of course youíll come away with the proper directed conclusion. And thatís how itís worked. Itís worked by psychologists and neuroscientists, has been for an awful long time, even before they had the name neuroscientist. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, Iím back Cutting Through The Matrix and I donít know how many people have seen Ė maybe the folk who have done the Occupy Wall Street demonstrations across the country Ė have noticed these boxes, like scissors jacks; they go up two stories and theyíre police boxes, they call them. So tonight Iíll put a link up to one article on that; itís to do with the Lower Manhattan Zuccotti Park, about officer Guzman, apparently he was one of the guys who was in these metal boxes. But theyíre quite something. Theyíre kind of hydraulic, I guess, at the bottom and itís like a scissors jack; it goes up and the guy inside the box can raise it or lower it. And this thing is just full of equipment. I know itís got built-in microphones, in all directions. It can scan all cell phone calls in real time as itís all happening; in fact, they can block them all too if they want to, and they listen in on all the calls that are going on. And they watch everything through little television sets inside, all around the place, so they can actually get a good view, zoom right into anything or anybody. And it says here...
What Happened When I Tried to Get Some Answers About the Creepy NYPD Watchtower Monitoring OWS
alternet.org / Nick Turse / November 6, 2011
For the initiated, Sky Watch is like one of those mechanical forest walkers from the Star Wars movies without the lasers or the walking. Imagine an 7-foot by 6-foot metal box, with blacked out windows on its four sides, bristling with cameras, spotlights, and a small spinning anemometer (to calculate wind speed), atop spindly hydraulic legs that allow it to sit on the ground or rise up two stories. Inside that climate-controlled cube is a control panel with switches to turn on the lights, a joystick to raise and lower the unit, and various other remote controls that Officer Guzman (Alan: This was the guy who was in it apparently.) or someone like him can use to direct the cameras and watch their feeds on video screens (while they are recorded on multiple digital video recorders).
So Iíll put that one up tonight just to let those who havenít seen it have a look and see what it looks like. Itís quite something when you see it for the first time. They can plonk them in the middle of roads. Iíve seen them in other places too, over the years across the US. And itís all to spy on everybody around them. So itís just amazing how free we are as weíre in a police state, an obvious police state, isnít it? And this article here too, is to do with this as well.
How the War on Terror Has Militarized the Police
(A: ...for those who havenít quite noticed, because you see, most folk donít notice. Along with all the movies they watch, theyíve been programmed in predictive programming to expect whatís to come, along with all of that, and actually going through and adapting to the war on terror, as they like to call it Ė they donít notice that theyíre in the middle of a police state. They really donít, most folk.)
theatlantic.com / Arthur Rizer & Joseph Hartman / Nov 7, 2011
At around 9:00 a.m. on May 5, 2011, officers with the Pima County, Arizona, Sheriff's Department's Special Weapons and Tactics (S.W.A.T.) team surrounded the home of 26-year-old Josť Guerena, a former U.S. Marine and veteran of two tours of duty in Iraq, to serve a search warrant for narcotics. (A: Now, SWAT teams, should they be sent out just to serve a search warrant? You know darn well that theyíre assassination teams; weíve been watching these things for years.) As the officers approached, Guerena lay sleeping in his bedroom after working the graveyard shift at a local mine. When his wife Vanessa woke him up, screaming that she had seen a man outside the window pointing a gun at her, Guerena grabbed his AR-15 rifle, instructed Vanessa to hide in the closet with their four-year old son, and left the bedroom to investigate.
Within moments, and without Guerena firing a shot--or even switching his rifle off of "safety"--he lay dying, his body riddled with 60 bullets. A subsequent investigation revealed that the initial shot that prompted the S.W.A.T. team barrage came from a S.W.A.T. team gun (A: ...which is the most common.), not Guerena's. (A: Actually theyíre itching to kill folk, the way theyíre trained, theyíre itching to kill.) Guerena, reports later revealed, had no criminal record, and no narcotics were found at his home. (A: Itís one of these, oh well, you know, just oops, oops moments that just come and go, they come and go, these oops moments, and nothing ever happens.)
Sadly, the Guerenas are not alone; in recent years we have witnessed a proliferation in incidents of excessive, military-style force by police S.W.A.T. teams, which often make national headlines due to their sheer brutality. Why has it become routine for police departments to deploy black-garbed, body-armored S.W.A.T. teams for routine domestic police work? The answer to this question requires a closer examination of post-9/11 U.S. foreign policy and the War on Terror.
Ever since September 14, 2001, when President Bush declared war on terrorism, there has been a crucial, yet often unrecognized, shift in United States policy. Before 9/11, law enforcement possessed the primary responsibility for combating terrorism in the United States. Today, the military is at the tip of the anti-terrorism spear. This shift appears to be permanent (A: Thatís what Iíve said before, youíre in a permanent police state now.): in 2006, the White House's National Strategy for Combating Terrorism confidently announced that the United States had "broken old orthodoxies that once confined our counterterrorism efforts primarily to the criminal justice domain."
In an effort to remedy their relative inadequacy in dealing with terrorism on U.S. soil, police forces throughout the country have purchased military equipment, adopted military training, and sought to inculcate a "soldier's mentality" among their ranks. (A: Actually itís because they recruit a lot of the guys from the military, thatís why.) Though the reasons for this increasing militarization of American police forces seem obvious, the dangerous side effects are somewhat less apparent.
Undoubtedly, American police departments have substantially increased their use of military-grade equipment and weaponry to perform their counterterrorism duties, adopting everything from body armor to, in some cases, attack helicopters. The logic behind this is understandable. If superior, military-grade equipment helps the police catch more criminals and avert, or at least reduce, the threat of a domestic terror attack, then we ought deem it an instance of positive sharing of technology -- right? Not necessarily. Indeed, experts in the legal community have raised serious concerns that allowing civilian law enforcement to use military technology runs the risk of blurring the distinction between soldiers and peace officers. (A: Actually, you got to understand too, itís deliberate, too, the whole perception. Everything, again, is perception. And your predictive programming from all the movies youíve watched, even long before 9/11, with the SWAT teams just rampaging through homes and bashing down doors and killing folk, has normalized it. Itís actually normalized it in your minds so you donít really care as long theyíre not busting down your door and killing you.)
This is especially true in cases where, much to the chagrin of civil liberty advocates, police departments have employed their newly acquired military weaponry not only to combat terrorism but also for everyday patrolling. Before 9/11, the usual heavy weaponry available to a small-town police officer consisted of a standard pump-action shot gun, perhaps a high power rifle, and possibly a surplus M-16, which would usually have been kept in the trunk of the supervising officer's vehicle. Now, police officers routinely walk the beat armed with assault rifles and garbed in black full-battle uniforms. When one of us, Arthur Rizer, returned from active duty in Iraq, he saw a police officer at the Minneapolis airport armed with a M4 carbine assault rifle -- the very same rifle Arthur carried during his combat tour in Fallujah.
The extent of this weapon "inflation" does not stop with high-powered rifles, either. In recent years, police departments both large and small have acquired bazookas, machine guns, and even armored vehicles (mini-tanks) for use in domestic police work.
To assist them in deploying this new weaponry, police departments have also sought and received extensive military training and tactical instruction. Originally, only the largest of America's big-city police departments maintained S.W.A.T. teams, and they were called upon only when no other peaceful option was available and a truly military-level response was necessary. Today, virtually every police department in the nation has one or more S.W.A.T. teams, the members of whom are often trained by and with United States special operations commandos. Furthermore, with the safety of their officers in mind, these departments now habitually deploy their S.W.A.T. teams for minor operations such as serving warrants. In short, "special" has quietly become "routine."
The most serious consequence of the rapid militarization of American police forces, however, is the subtle evolution in the mentality of the "men in blue" from "peace officer" to soldier. This development is absolutely critical and represents a fundamental change in the nature of law enforcement. The primary mission of a police officer traditionally has been to "keep the peace." Those whom an officer suspects to have committed a crime are treated as just that - suspects. Police officers are expected, under the rule of law, to protect the civil liberties of all citizens, even the "bad guys." For domestic law enforcement, a suspect in custody remains innocent until proven guilty. Moreover, police officers operate among a largely friendly population and have traditionally been trained to solve problems using a complex legal system; the deployment of lethal violence is an absolute last resort. (A: Well, it used to be. But again, going back to the movies, how many movies have you watched where they just bust down the doors and shoot the bad guys? who are criminals, you know? Is that what you do with criminals, you just kill the criminals? Thatís what the courts are for, is to deal with the criminals.)
Soldiers, by contrast, are trained to identify people they encounter as belonging to one of two groups -- the enemy and the non-enemy -- and they often reach this decision while surrounded by a population that considers the soldier an occupying force. (A: ...which he generally is.) Once this identification is made, a soldier's mission is stark and simple: kill the enemy, "try" not to kill the non-enemy. Indeed, the Soldier's Creed declares, "I stand ready to deploy, engage, and destroy the enemies of the United States of America in close combat." This is a far cry from the peace officer's creed that expects its adherents "to protect and serve."
The point here is not to suggest that police officers in the field should not take advantage of every tactic or piece of equipment that makes them safer as they carry out their often challenging and strenuous duties. Nor do I mean to suggest that a police officer, once trained in military tactics, will now seek to kill civilians. It is far too easy for Monday-morning quarterbacks to unfairly second-guess the way police officers perform their jobs while they are out on the streets waging what must, at times, feel like a war.
Notwithstanding this concern, however, Americans should remain mindful bringing military-style training to domestic law enforcement has real consequences. When police officers are dressed like soldiers, armed like soldiers, and trained like soldiers, it's not surprising that they are beginning to act like soldiers. And remember: a soldier's main objective is to kill the enemy. (A: Well actually, itís engrained now. Itís now the new normal and itís not going to change, folks. It wonít change.)
It wonít change from any administrationís quarters, put it that way. Itís now part of the system, not only in America but elsewhere too. They can be serving warrants for petty things, and very often, the amount of stories where theyíve gone into the wrong houses or apartments and killed everybody in the place is just utterly incredibly disgusting. And thereís more and more happening all the time. And you better believe it, once, you see, you get a militarized police, itís not just the police thatís militarized, you have a militarized mindset in society and Iíll touch on that when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, Iím back and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about the militarization of the police. Theyíre everywhere, even in small towns, who wear combat boots and all the rest of it. And itís just ridiculous. This is to familiarize the public with this style. And by the way, in Canada, across the provinces in Canada, Iíve mentioned before, in a small town where I was before 9/11 happened in the late 90s, there were little pieces in the newspapers telling the people to expect to see the police in their smart new uniforms. And they actually got guys, almost like models, to walk down the streets in these police outfits and actually smile, instead of glower at the public. What surprised me is nobody noticed, as theyíre all passing by, these guys wearing black ties, black shirts, black jackets, combat boots with their pants tucked in and all the rest of it. And no one noticed.
Most folk take things in through osmosis. Thatís how they learn. Itís almost subconscious, maybe by repeated exposures to seeing something. Itís like itís always been like that. They donít notice the changes. Itís quite amazing. The experts have been working on every facet of our minds, because they know how the general public work. Theyíre absolutely certain on it. They are. Theyíre certain that it actually works. Anyway, when you militarize the police you get a militarized mindset amongst the general population. And they put up with it too, as though it was a war going on, but these guys were supposed to be after terrorists, not even drug dealers and so on. So you cannot mix the two together.
And then again, when they do go in and kill the wrong people at the wrong houses and everything else, and they open fire first as well, youíve got an out of control system here. And the public have a militarized mindset with all the movies, ya-da, ya-da, ya, they donít think, weíd better stop this right now. You got to stop it right now. And there has to be a big show of these guys being charged, and drummed out of the police service. Youíd better. If you want confidence in the general public thatís what you got to do. You understand, because the public are so far gone they donít mind; they wonít do a darn thing about it. Oh well, poor schmuck, I guess a casualty of war, you know, collateral damage, you know, thatís all it is. And nothing happens. So itís past that point. Personally, thatís my point of view. Thatís my point of view.
And amazing too how theyíre changing everything and of course one of the biggest targets for centuries was the Catholic Church, many centuries actually, by a particular group. This article here is about theyíre changing the mass again. It says...
American Catholics Prep For New Mass Translation
huttingtonpost.com / RACHEL ZOLL / 11/ 5/11
RIVER EDGE, N.J. ó Each Sunday for decades, Roman Catholic priests have offered the blessing Ė "Lord be with you." And each Sunday, parishioners would respond, "And also with you."
Until this month.
Come Nov. 27, the response will be, "And with your spirit." And so will begin a small revolution in a tradition-rich faith.
At the end of the month, parishes in English-speaking countries will begin to use a new translation of the Roman Missal (A: Thatís not Ďmissileí, thatís ĎMissal.í), the ritual text of prayers and instructions for celebrating Mass. International committees of specialists worked under a Vatican directive to hew close to the Latin (A: In other words, keep close to the Latin.), sparking often bitter protests by English speakers over phrasing and readability. After years of revisions negotiated by bishops' conferences and the Holy See, dioceses are preparing anxious clergy and parishioners for the rollout, one of the biggest changes in Catholic worship in generations. (A: So itís upsetting a lot of them because they have to go and redo and relearn a lot of stuff, and so will the public too I suppose, as they answer back in these Missals. Nothing gets to stay much the same, eh, except the ones that rule us. [Alan laughing.])
Hereís another article too, about...
Carbon tax becomes a reality
au.finance.yahoo.com / 8 November 2011
The Gillard Government (A: In Australia, the first one, the one that was given the honor by the Council on Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of International Affairs to kick off the carbon taxes as a country, and it comes right down to the personal level eventually.) has passed the final hurdle in making the carbon tax a reality with the controversial bill passing through the Senate.
The government and the Greens used their numbers in the upper house to vote in favor of the 'Clean Energy Bill 2011'. (A: Of course, they all get their backhanders from the lobbyists too for doing it, because the big boys want it; theyíre going to make a fortune on it.)
The government's mechanism to price carbon will begin on July 1, 2012, with a $23-per-tonne carbon tax on the 500 biggest polluters. (A: Thatís bull as we all know because the public eventually pay for everything.) The tax will then move towards a market-driven emissions trading scheme (ETS) in 2015. (A: And actually, itíll be just like the taxes. The guys will buy a whole bunch and theyíll trade it and make a profit; as they already have in the European Union.)
The carbon tax aims to cut Australia's emissions by 5% from year 2000 levels by the year 2020, and bring emissions down 80% by 2050. (A: So I guess you have to get rid of 80% of the population.)
Before the bill passed, Treasurer Wayne Swan labelled the vote as historic, claiming the reform would be a (A: Listen to their terminology...) "victory for the optimists and it will be a defeat for the deniers." (A: Is this a holocaust thing or something?)
Mr Swan continued, "What's important about today (A: This is all deliberate, you understand, this terminology.) is the government has done the hard yards putting in place the important long-term reforms, which will ensure our future prosperity. (A: Actually theyíve lost more business than ever before, even when they started talking about it.) Nothing could be more important to our nation." (A: Anyway, what they did at the end was to open champagne in the House, and all the guys that got lobbied, all these politicians, drank their victory, and now theyíll go out and get their rewards, you know, the old-fashioned way from their lobbyists.)
This is an interesting article about the Atomic Energy Agency. Itís such a farce to call it an agency today; itís a political agency now really. Itís supposed to be the International Atomic Energy Agency. I hear the music coming; Iíll go into this accusation when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about the International Atomic Energy Agency. It says...
'US dictated new IAEA report to Amano'
presstv.ir / Nov 8, 2011
According to latest news reports, Amano (A: Heís apparently Japanese I think; kind of. Director-General Yukiya Amano) will also attach a 15-page addendum with the new report, detailing documents about certain alleged studies, Keyhan wrote on Tuesday.
The daily quoted Iranian diplomats as saying that during his visit to Washington last week, Amano received orders about the necessity of releasing the report at the current juncture and for this reason he declined to accept requests by Russia, China, some European countries and member states of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) to remain impartial on Iran. (A: In other words, the US has asked him to condemn Iran and fudge the statistics and reports, whereas Russia, China and other countries were wanting him to go ahead with the current reality of what they really do have on Iran.)
Experts in Iran and the IAEA secretariat believe that the addendum is technically and legally indefensible and will quickly call into question the agency's credibility. (A: Its credibility has already been called in before.)
Keyhan said that the IAEA's November 2011 report includes no new documents and all existing ones are those found on the laptop allegedly spirited out of Iran in 2004.
The report will prove that despite his claims, Amano had no new information and released the same old data. This indicates that the IAEA is lying about having information showing that Iran had a nuclear weapons program after 2004.
Neither Iran nor the IAEA have ever seen the original documents. Although Iran and the IAEA, have since 2007, demanded that the original documents be given to an independent team to ascertain their authenticity the US has repeatedly declined. (A: Itís kind of like, oh weíve got the real dope on them, you know, weapons of mass destruction stuff, but we canít show them to you.) These US refusals were so annoying that former IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei repeatedly accused the Americans of obstructing the agency's Safeguards.
It appears that the US merely possesses an electronic file and there is no original file on the alleged studies. In 2007, Iran presented a 117-page assessment to the IAEA in which Tehran proved that the documents on alleged studies were forged. Amano did not mention this in his report.
Another important fact is that even if the documents in question are authenticated, the IAEA or any other source cannot prove they are linked to Iran. In other words, gathering a few documents, doctoring letterheads, and forging a few signatures and seals do not prove that these documents belonged to Iranian governmental institutions.
There is also no report or document that proves the use of nuclear material in what the Agency calls alleged studies. Therefore, even if hypothetically these documents were authenticated they could be pertaining to conventional military activities and claiming that these activities were nuclear in nature is completely without grounds.
So in other words, theyíre setting up Iran for the invasion. They have to do it, and we know that too. As soon as they put the sanctions on any country and no-fly zones and all the rest of it you know theyíre about to bomb it. And we know that Israel wants that too; in fact, itís been in their Ė just have a scan of the Israeli newspapers. And the push, from the top, from the administration actually, not so much from the people, to get into and bomb Iran. So theyíd rather have the US do it and pay for it all, and itís quite good to get things for free. But weíll see how it goes. Anyway, weíre so sick of this ďweapons of mass destruction,Ē ya-da, ya-da, ya-da, ya, and weíve watched them bombing all through the countries, the same countries that were on the list from George Bushís day when he was a member, under Rumsfeld, with Rumsfeld and Cheney, and there was Perle behind the scenes too, Wolfowitz, who set up the New American Century with the list on it of all countries they wanted to take out. And then they congratulated Obama for carrying on with the same list. So, you know, When you see the same theme going through changes in government in the US, you know youíre under tyranny; thatís what Jefferson said. And you are. Youíre getting run by, itís difficult to say a foreign power, technically, but itís a sort of foreign power. And theyíll use any lies to get their agenda through. And that goes with the civilian populations as well, including everybody at home.
You understand, even when it comes down to this new system, this austerity that you must go into, that was put out first of all by the United Nations, a time of austerity, and supported, by the way, by the big international bankers, who support all sides, and actually lead all sides, you find austerity also comes into sustainability. Sustainability has two meanings under the United Nations. Partly itís sustainability of resources. But the big meaning, the one that they admit to on their own sites, if you look deep enough, of sustainability, is the redistribution of your wealth to other countries, and resources. So, taking big chunks of your paycheck to ensure that people in other countries and poorer countries will get these things, at an awfully big discount, all the goodies that you crave in your own countries, in the post-consumerist society. So weíre going through a big, big agenda to change the whole world. The new world order means itís going to change the world. That means all of your cultures, traditions, everything that went with it, are gradually phased out in the meantime and they bring in the new.
Exactly what theyíre doing with the European Union, trying to get rid of their flags. Theyíve already put their history down the memory hole. Nothing happened, apparently, before the creation of the first tentative steps of the European Union. I guess we were all living in the caves before that. So it all started after World War II, civilization, apparently, and thatís what the children are now taught. You go back even further and youíll find the same movement with John Dewey and others who came out to make sure that the educational system would give out the right kind of brainwashing. You understand, to change cultures and to ensure that propaganda will take on a population, you must start and give them THE basic education. That trains them through a whole bunch of scientific methods to accept rubbish and BS in the future. So itís essential for propaganda to always be preceded by the correct kind of indoctrination, or education as they call it. Itís more difficult to brainwash through propaganda an illiterate society. They know that. This is all in their own books, you know, their teaching books for how to do it. [Alan laughing.] So as I say, weíre really into something else.
Now, I mentioned this last night, just touched on it but didnít go into the story. It was to do with China. Now, China is a model state for us all to follow. Itís supposedly still communist and all the big boys, the big bankers, the internationalists, love China because itís still totalitarian in its structure, you must apply to the politburo if you want to get a business off the ground because they have a big cut in what your business is going to be, and they also have their own kind of bank at the government where they can fund it as well. So the bankers are all in on it. By the way, the same banking families are really all throughout China. And this article here is about what they think of us, you see, this country that weíve all to become, where they run children over in the streets and stuff like that and itís no big deal, like the articles I read a week or two ago. It says...
Jin Liqun: Europe induces 'sloth, indolence'
The chairman of China's sovereign wealth fund remains sceptical about supporting a European bailout.
english.aljazeera.net / 9 Nov 2011
As the global financial crisis continues to hit the eurozone, Nicolas Sarkozy, the French president, and other European leaders have been banking on China to step in and wave its magic wand. But is China prepared to bail out Europe? (A: This is so comical, isnít it really? Because you see, WE created China with our tax money, not because we were asked to, in fact most folk didnít even know it was happening. It was done through the World Trade Organization, this umbrella group joined together with a special unit at the WTO of a Star Chamber of judges who decided that they were going to put all your money out to China and bring them up to a first world status, under the Royal Institute of International Affairs agenda. Thatís what theyíre doing, the same with Brazil and other countries, India now too. And then they also said that the taxpayers in America, Canada and elsewhere will fund all businesses to move out of your country and weíll pay them for 10 years or more, 15 years, to set up in China, and weíll pay them any losses they incur, or claim theyíve incurred, up until that time. Not bad, eh? Thatís your own politicians that did that, folks, because they donít serve you; they belong to special societies, you see. So hereís China now, the big manufacturer for the planet, as it was designed to be, and this is what they think of you.)
Al Jazeera's Teymoor Nabili talks to Jin Liqun, the supervising chairman of China Investment Corporation, China's sovereign wealth fund, to find out whether China is willing to invest more money in Europe, in particular in the European Financial Stability Fund (IFSF), which European leaders now want to beef up for future bailouts. (A: See, weíve got to be interdependent, meaning weíll all sink if one goes down. This is part of the con of all this EU crisis stuff thatís going right now.)
Jin, who has served as China's deputy minister of finance and vice president of the Asian Development Bank (A: Thatís part of the UN too, or The World Bank.), manages $400bn worth of the nation's money through the sovereign wealth fund. He says that unless Europe changes its labour laws (A: They want to change and knock down the labor laws, by the way.) and adjusts its welfare system (A: That means, literally, eradicate it, to be like China.), he does not consider it to be a profitable investment.
"If you look at the troubles which happened in European countries, this is purely because of the accumulated troubles of the worn out welfare society. (A: This is a socialist talking, supposedly. Real socialism is very much different from what you think at the bottom.) I think the labour laws are outdated. The labour laws induce sloth (A: So everybodyís lazy, in the West.), indolence (A: ...to their employers.), rather than hardworking. The incentive system, is totally out of whack.
"Why should, for instance, within [the] eurozone some member's people have to work to 65, even longer, whereas in some other countries they are happily retiring at 55, languishing on the beach? This is unfair. The welfare system is good for any society to reduce the gap, to help those who happen to have disadvantages, to enjoy a good life, but a welfare society should not induce people not to work hard."
So thatís China who will shortly be dictating to YOU, telling you what they think of you. And remember too, under ongoing negotiations, theyíve already passed some laws to let them INTO your countries, across the world. This is part of the Free Trade deal put out, based in London, the Royal Institute of International Affairs and the Council on Foreign Relations in America; they hammered out the free flow of labor and goods into your country. And they can bring in their own labor and pay them at their own wages, but they also want, they ALSO want to pay YOU, at the wages you get paid, as if you were a little hard-working character in China. Donít forget that. And this is all done from the boys in London Ė amazing, eh Ė who have been running this whole show and agenda for well over 100 years.
U.S. Glossed Over Cancer Concerns Associated
with Airport X-Ray Scanners
scientificamerican.com / Michael Grabell and ProPublica / November 1, 2011
Experts say the dose from the backscatter is negligible when compared with naturally occurring background radiation, but a linear model shows even such trivial amounts increase the number of cancer cases.
On Sept. 23, 1998, a panel of radiation safety experts gathered at a Hilton hotel in Maryland to evaluate a new device that could detect hidden weapons and contraband. The machine, known as the Secure 1000, beamed X-rays at people to see underneath their clothing.
One after another, the experts convened by the Food and Drug Administration raised questions about the machine because it violated a longstanding principle in radiation safety (A: And the principle is....)ó that humans shouldnít be X-rayed unless there is a medical benefit. (A: So theyíve broken that law, like every other law theyíre breaking.)
ďI think this is really a slippery slope,Ē said Jill Lipoti, who was the director of New Jerseyís radiation protection program. The device was already deployed in prisons; what was next, she and others asked ó courthouses, schools, airports? ďI am concerned Ö with expanding this type of product for the traveling public,Ē said another panelist, Stanley Savic, the vice president for safety at a large electronics company. ďI think that would take this thing to an entirely different level of public health risk.Ē
The machineís inventor, Steven W. Smith, assured the panelists that it was highly unlikely that the device would see widespread use in the near future. At the time, only 20 machines were in operation in the entire country.
ďThe places I think you are not going to see these in the next five years is lower-security facilities, particularly power plants, embassies, courthouses, airports and governments,Ē Smith said. ďI would be extremely surprised in the next five to 10 years if the Secure 1000 is sold to any of these.Ē
Today, the United States has begun marching millions of airline passengers through the X-ray body scanners, parting ways with countries in Europe and elsewhere that have concluded that such widespread use of even low-level radiation poses an unacceptable health risk. The government is rolling out the X-ray scanners despite having a safer alternative that the Transportation Security Administration says is also highly effective.
A ProPublica/PBS NewsHour investigation of how this decision was made shows that in post-9/11 America, security issues can trump even long-established medical conventions. The final call to deploy the X-ray machines was made not by the FDA, which regulates drugs and medical devices, but by the TSA, an agency whose primary mission is to prevent terrorist attacks. (A: So once again, this whole terrorism thing allows them to break all rules.)
Research suggests that anywhere from six to 100 U.S. airline passengers each year could get cancer from the machines. Still, the TSA has repeatedly defined the scanners as ďsafe,Ē glossing over the accepted scientific view that even low doses of ionizing radiation ó the kind beamed directly at the body by the X-ray scanners ó increase the risk of cancer.
ďEven though itís a very small risk, when you expose that number of people, thereís a potential for some of them to get cancer,Ē said Kathleen Kaufman, the former radiation management director in Los Angeles County, who brought the prison X-rays to the FDA panelís attention.
Itís interesting that Israel is the company that churns out a lot of these, and they wonít use them in Israel; they say theyíre no use anyway. Apart from cancer theyíre no use, you know, and it doesnít matter. And then the guy who was the security guy at the top of the US Ė was the guy at the time, I think it was Tom Ridge, then the guy who took over from him Ė they were the guys who started it up when they left government, theyíd started it up and pushed them like salesmen in the US. And tonight Iíll try and find that article too, that was put out this year to the employees of the TSA because it actually says in it that theyíve had such a massive increase in cancer with employees around these radiation scanners, that theyíre complaining and wanting more safety regulations brought in, etc, etc... so you can know whatís happening to the general population. It doesnít matter about you; youíre collateral damage, again. Plus it brings down the population and it will also help to sterilize you, which is part of it. Thereís a whole bunch of agendas that can be worked out in one go here, eh? Not too bad. These guys arenít stupid are they?
Did Airport Scanners Give Boston TSA Agents Cancer? - healthland.time.com / June 30, 2011
And weíve watched this farce in Europe, the whole farce, it really is a farce, just one big long play, isnít it? Where they say, oh weíll keep trying to plug this hole in Greece, we donít know where the money goes, or we wonít tell you where it goes, or where itís already gone. And trillions have been tossed at it, from every country, until theyíre all broke, and supposedly you all have to get broke together and go down together before one can be allowed to go down, or just write off the debt, you know. So thereís no trick dirty enough to get this through, this big central bank with the IMF in charge of it all, which was on the cards. Quigley talked about it in the 1960s. He was the historian for the Royal Institute of International Affairs/Council on Foreign Relations. Theyíre fulfilling every part of their agenda that he talked about. It says...
EU SUMMIT SEALS ONE TRILLION (A: One trillion....) EURO DEAL AFTER MERKEL (A: In Germany.) WARNS OF WAR IN EUROPE (A: ...if they donít get it through. Nothingís low enough for them, eh?)
express.co.uk / October 27, 2011 / Macer Hall, Political Editor
JUST hours after Germany issued a chilling warning that war could again engulf Europe, EU leaders made a desperate 1 trillion bid to save the euro. (A: Theyíre scraping the barrel here to try to convince the public, who are already terrified theyíre all going to collapse, that theyíll HAVE TO go along with it to be SAVED. So the central bank, which they hate, is going to save them now. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, Iím back Cutting Through The Matrix and just to finish off, talking about China, itís got the most favored nation trading status to the United States and elsewhere, by the United Nations, and the CFR and the Royal Institute of International Affairs, who set the whole free trade deals up. And they planned that over 100 years ago. Anyway...
US weapons 'full of fake Chinese parts'
Thousands of United States' warplanes, ships and missiles contain fake electronic components from China, leaving them open to malfunction, according to a US Senate committee.
telegraph.co.uk / Malcolm Moore, Shanghai / 8 Nov 2011
The US Senate Armed Services Committee said its researchers had uncovered 1,800 cases in which the Pentagon had been sold electronics that may be counterfeit. (A: Itís from China. You should tell that to that guy that said they should do away with all the workersí rights across the West, eh?)
In total, the committee said it had found more than a million fake parts had made their way into warplanes such as the Boeing C-17 transport jet and the Lockheed Martin C-130J "Super Hercules".
It also found fake components in Boeing's CH-46 Sea Knight helicopter and the Theatre High-Altitude Area Defence (THAAD) missile defence system.
"A million parts is surely a huge number. But I want to repeat this: we have only looked at a portion of the defence supply chain. So those 1,800 cases are just the tip of the iceberg," said Senator Carl Levin.
In around seven in 10 cases, the fake parts originated in China, while investigators traced another 20 per cent of cases to the United Kingdom and Canada, known resale points for Chinese counterfeits. (A: So they should arrest Britain and Canada then shouldnít they? for selling counterfeit parts on behalf of the Chinese.)
In the southern Chinese province of Guangdong, counterfeit microchips are often smuggled out of factories, or burned off old computer circuit boards before having their identifying marks sanded off and repainted as new. (A: Itís true. Theyíve got hoards of children sitting painting these things, around the garbage dumps.)
In Chinese bazaars, "military grade" microchips are openly advertised, although these chips are often commercial chips that have been modified and relabelled.
Military grade chips are designed to withstand far greater extremes of temperature and humidity, and there are fears that the fake Chinese parts could suddenly fail.
"We cannot tolerate the risk of a ballistic missile interceptor failing to hit its target, a helicopter pilot unable to fire his missiles, or any other mission failure because of a counterfeit part," said John McCain, the senior Republican Senator on the committee. (A: I guess, you see, Lockheed Martin and these guys, the big war industry boys, are wanting to start making them back home, or somewhere else, probably, again, from China; theyíll just have a better watch over that theyíre made properly. They probably want the contract for themselves.)
Experts said the problems are not new, and have dated from a decision in the 1990s by the Clinton administration to cut costs by asking the Pentagon to buy "off-the-shelf" electronics, rather than designing its own systems.
As electronics manufacturing migrated to China (A: It was given to China, by the way.), the US has been less and less able to control the quality of its military hardware. Some of the fake chips are bought by the Pentagon on the open market in order to maintain its fleet of older vehicles, which have outdated circuitry. These chips are often salvaged by Chinese scrap merchants from the dumps of electronic waste that have accumulated in the south of the country.
In 2008, an investigation by the US Commerce department found nearly 7,400 incidents of fake electronics in military hardware (A: And actually thereís way more than that in civilian stuff. You donít dare buy a wall socket to put in for your mains for your electricity in a room. I had one here and it had all the stamps on it, commercially approved and the whole thing, and the darn thing blew the main fuses as soon as I plugged anything into it, because it had literally no insulation between any of the contacts whatsoever.), while in 2005, internal Pentagon documents suggested that there had been equipment malfunctions because of fake parts.
The senate committee said China should "act promptly" and clamp down on its flourishing electronics black market. (A: And ya-da, ya, and ya-da, ya-da, ya, etc, and it goes on and on.)
Iíll put all these links up now at cuttingthroughthematrix.com in about an hourís time and you can have a look at them for yourselves, maybe save them for posterity, when youíre talking to children who wonít have a clue that things were any different than the totalitarian system theyíll live under then.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. Remember, help me out too, and you can donate or buy the books, etc. See you tomorrow.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Creepy Watchtower Monitoring Unit at OWS
Militarization of Police--Swat Teams are Liquidation Units
Catholic Mass Changes Yet Again
Politicos in Australia Pop Champagne as Carbon Tax a Reality
International Atomic Energy Agency Politically Compromised?
Capitalist Communist China Talks on the Sloth of Europe
Radiation Experts' Report on Scanners Ignored
--More on Above
Pulling All Stops Out and Stooping Low to get 1 Trillion Euro--to Save the Euro
US Weapons full of Imported Fake Chinese Electronic Parts