Feb. 8, 2010 (#509)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 8, 2010:
Greet Your Corporate-Feudal
Won by Book-keeping Entries, Not by Sword:
"The Irish Found Out After EU Referendum,
A New Foreign Entity Can Buy and Sell 'em,
It Takes Will to Back The Luck of the Clover,
Now it's England's Turn, Selling Port Town of Dover,
Bluebirds Have Left, They First Mourned and Wept,
As Piecemeal, the U.K. is Sold Off for Debt,
People Fought Invaders from Hitler to Hadrian,
Betrayed by Governments Using Technique of Fabian,
And the Rich Society Which Uses that Name,
Sworn to End Nation-States --They're Winning the Game"
© Alan Watt Feb. 8, 2010
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Feb. 8, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on February 8th 2010. For the newcomers out there, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and scroll down. Youíll find all the other sites I have up there. Bookmark them for future use because sometimes the big ones do go down and I do believe, the way the various laws are being passed, a lot more will be going down in the near future. So if you bookmark these you can always get the latest downloads for free. There are: [official sites listed above]. Sometimes too itís a good idea if you find when you go into the .com site, and generally after the show everyone goes in at once, it can have sticky downloads. So spread them out into these other sites and it might solve the problem.
I always get my tin can out now and rattle it for you. The reason itís quite is because there is nothing in it. But the fact is, I need YOU, youíre the audience who brings me to you. Iím not backed by any sponsor. Iím not backed by any company selling anything. The ads on the show that you hear are paid by the advertisers straight to RBN for the broadcast of this particular program and Iíve got nothing at all to do with it. So itís up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into any of my web sites and see what I have for sale - the books, CDs and DVDs - and you can also donate. [Ordering and donations options listed above.] For those who get the disks burned of all the talks I do and they are passed to them at meetings and so on, who donít like using computers, you can get in touch with me at [address above]. That about covers it. Donít wait for other people to throw a few pennies this way because that way no one does it. Thatís the nature of humanity. Thatís the way it goes.
Everything is supposed to be free these days. There is a whole generation growing up thinking everything is free. They donít realize that everything that is free really is a trap to get more information from them. With everything that is free you generally find there are spins on things because people have a particular agenda, even when they are disclosing truthful information; itís how they spin it that depends on who is backing them. There are big organizations out there, there are world organizations spewing out information like you wouldnít believe with details on world events that you donít get access to. Itís because they are well organized and well funded and they work together with the big boys who run the foundations. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. Itís quite interesting that so many things are going on at the same time today that you canít keep up with them. There are TOO many things happening all together but they all FLOW in one directionÖ all the things that you hear and see and they talk about, all flow in ONE particular direction and they come together.
Itís quite amazing to see how a planned global society that can push part of a plan, wait for 5 years, push the envelope a bit further along the same direction, wait another 5 years. Actually itís getting shorter now; they can train us every year and update us every year or so. They do the same with every other part of the global agenda and yet most of us still think we are living on the cutting edge of the information age where we know everything thatís going on. Weíre always given reasons or excuses for things but even the simplest person knows there is something else behind what weíre being told. Itís always been this way, to be honest with you. We are the last to know anything. The ordinary people are the last to know EVER whatís really, really happening. You generally have to wait 50 years, if you live that long, or even 100 sometimes because they can reclassify stuff after its time for exposure for another 50 yearsÖ or even 100 years. Thatís what they actually do. Why would you have to classify certain information for 50 or 100 years? Öfrom ANY population? Öby its own government supposedly? When itís, supposedly again, you are given the whole story at the time in the media, at least what you are supposed to believe FOR the next 50 to 100 years.
We never get the truth. Itís the same with wars. Wars, from the most ancient times have been economic wars. Economic wars and POWER wars. Power of very high people stemming originally from small families or clans who rose to the top by being utterly ruthless with everyone else around them and going off and conquering the next one and after a few generations they can run a country basically. From the countries they occupy - this happened in ancient times too - they then recruit millions of land troops to go off and invade other countries. Thatís how big empires were actually made. And yet, in every generation, even in the conquered countries that were supplying troops, they would then see themselves as being say Roman, for instance, and have no contact with the generations before them who obviously were not Roman because they were not brought up in that area. Thatís what empires are based on.
Itís so strange that, for instance, you can take a country like England that eventually creates Britain and then the UK and goes off and conquers, weíre told, ĺ of the world. They took the taxpayersí money to fund those armies and equip those armies. They were given pittances for paychecks. Behind them came the army engineers who would build the bridges and lay the train tracks and so on. Theyíd often import people from India, even into Africa, to lay the lines. That was so COMMERCE could flow because they wanted the resources of that country and the resources were then owned by not the country. The country would spend the money to take care of it and police it and supply the military to defend it but it was for PRIVATE CORPORATIONS and nothing really, really has changed. Nothing at all has really, really changed. Weíre led by the media to think that weíre on the cutting edge and whatever they tell you is good enough at the time. Unfortunately for most people it is good enough at the time and for the rest of their lives very often.
This will tie in with some of the things that Iím going to talk about tonight but before I do, Iím going to mention that Iíll put up a couple of links. One is for the Environmental Modification Treaty from the United Nations to show you at least how far back we can trace the original treaties. This one too, isnít the first one; itís in the 1970s but it does mention that theyíve not to use the creation of hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, tsunamis, droughts or floods on other countries. It doesnít say anything about not using it upon your own people. Iíll put that link up there.
CONVENTION ON THE PROHIBITION OF MILITARY OR ANY OTHER HOSTILE USE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MODIFICATION TECHNIQUES
1. Each State Party to this Convention undertakes not to engage in military or any other hostile use of environmental modification techniques having widespread, long-lasting or severe effects as the means of destruction, damage or injury to any other State Party.
There is also a good videoÖ I depend on people sending me videos because XplorNet has cut me back at least two-thirds of the speed because someone in a high place told them to do so. I cannot download even audios; itís the bad. There is a video that someone sent me thatís called, The Great Global Warming Swindle. It came out in about 2007. There are a lot of people who worked at the IPCC for the United Nations who left it on this particular video. Theyíre all scientists themselves; these are not people answering the question, what to you BELIEVE about so and so. They are telling you what they know about it. Itís very informative indeed.
There is also another link to two other major scientists who debunk the whole theory of greenhouse gases and the greenhouse effect in fact. Iíll put that link up as well. There is a .pdf from that link. It takes you to their actual writings. Youíll enjoy that. Going through it, itís kind of dry, itís quite long, but it really uses science to show and to prove. Thatís what you are supposed to use science for. You donít go up to people and say, what do you believe. So Iíll put those up there and you can look into them.
The Science (Fiction) of the Greenhouse Effect
Written by Rebecca Terrell / Wednesday, 27 January 2010
Two German physicists have written a paper debunking the "theory" of the greenhouse gas effect by demonstrating how it violates basic laws of physics. Their paper, Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects Within the Frame of Physics, was published last year in the peer-reviewed International Journal of Modern Physics.
The authors are Gerhard Gerlich, a professor of mathematical physics at the Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina in Braunschweig, and Ralf Tscheuchner, a retired professor of theoretical physics and freelance lecturer and researcher in physics and applied informatics.
Anyone whoís got any good videos out there at all, please send them to me because as I say, I cannot download videos anymore because Iíve been a bad boy and governments have ways of phoning big corporations and using the old school ties to say, John, why donít you censor ole Watt there; heís been a bit of a nuisance. Thatís what they do; they give you the run around. They give you a thousand excuses but youíre beingÖ they call it Ďtechnical censorshipí when they actually alter the speed by technical means. They call it Ďtechnical censorship.í Iíve read the articles that the whole British Empire is actually doing this now. A few years ago, I used to have a lot of people in the Canadian government and bureaucrats who would, during their breaks or their lunch hour, they would listen to some of the shows and download the shows. It was the same in the US, a lot of governmental people. THEY ALL TOLD ME THAT THEY CANíT GET ME ANYMORE BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT HAS LITERALLY PUT A BLOCK ON ME FOR ALL GOVERNMENT COMPUTERS. That was quite a few years ago, so theyíve been at this for a long time... for those who really think theyíve got free speech.
There is movie called Gattaca. Iíve mentioned it quite few times over the years. Itís about an age Ė which is pretty well here; itís coming shortly Ė where genetic enhancement, meaning scientists intervene between the sperm and the ovum and take out what they claim MIGHT be defective genes and basically put together the perfect future world citizen to serve their system. It creates a class system where people who are conceived and born in the old-fashioned way are second-class citizens. All the good ones [genetically enhanced] get the top jobs; space exploration, high paying and all that stuff. Gattaca ties in with this article here that is from the Telegraph.
Gene test to be offered to couples planning children
Couples planning to have children will be able to take a test to see if they are at risk of having a baby with a genetic disease, it has been reported.
8 Feb 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
The screening has prompted criticism in some quarters by medical professionals who argue it plays on parents' fears (Alan: Thatís exactly what itís for. Itís like reading you hand. It tells you as much as someone reading the palm of your hand.) and is verging on 'eugenics'. (A: It IS eugenics. Thatís the whole point of it. Thatís where itís supposed to go. They gave the little tests to get your own one done, remember. Theyíve done exposťs on television on that, showing you itís all bunkum because they really canít predict if you will or will not get this or that.)
The saliva test, involving samples taken from each prospective parent, would discover if either was carrying a genetic mutation which could lead to cystic fibrosis, spinal muscular atrophy or sickle cell anaemia.
Couples will be able to pay £700 (A: Thatís a lot of money.) for the test at the Bridge Fertility Clinic in London. (A: Everything starts in London. Itís just quite amazing. But then again, thatís the flagship for the world isnít it? Thatís what they said at the Fabian Society. Thatís what they said at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, that the British system and the British Empire would be the nucleus of the system that the whole world was to get build upon. That was taken up by the CFR also.)
The clinic says it will only offer the screening alongside counselling, but the US company which developed the test plans to sell it online without medical advice, according to The Times.
The screening has prompted criticism in some quarters by medical professionals who argue it plays on parents' fears and is verging on "eugenics".
If the results show both parents carry recessive genes which could lead (A: I love the Ďcouldsí and Ďmaybesí.) to a disease, parents could choose to have IVF (A: Thatís exactly what Iím talking about.) and then screen their embryos to ensure healthy ones are implanted in the womb. (A: I wonder too, when they take ones out, which ones they are putting back in there to get the perfect, obedient citizen?)
They could also opt for genetic testing during pregnancy, sperm donation or adoption to prevent giving birth to a child with a genetic condition. (A: So weíre going into the Handmaidís Tale as well, obviously.)
People with a history of conditions such as cystic fibrosis can already be screened on the NHS.
The new test, developed by Consyl, checks for numerous conditions and would be available to the wider population and not just high risk groups.
(A: So they use the usual stuffÖ) "Couples have a fundamental right to know their carrier status (A: This is the people who are selling it, right.) and to make reproductive decisions on the basis of that status without outside interference." (A: They use all this scary stuff and Ďyour rightsí to sell their whole gimmickry here because thatís where it really is right now. They canít really tell which gene is going to line up with what other gene in the other person. Itís like reading the palm of your hand, but people will go for it.)
People will go for it. Anything to do with genetics, science is good, you know. Cutting edge science, weíve all got to get cutting edge science, itís just good for us, you know. Itís for our benefit too. Thatís how itís sold. That is how it is sold so it will take off like crazy.
We are going into this incredible Big Brother phase, with also Big Nanny coupled with it. Big Nanny and Big Brother. A nanny state where governments, through various enforcement agencies and right through the educational system, are really becoming the police over our THOUGHTS and our ACTIONS and all the rest of it. They are training us Pavlovian style to simply OBEY by automatic conditioned response. Things get sillier and sillier and sillier. This article is from New York.
Girl, 12, arrested in New York for doodling on school desk
2/5/2010 | USAToday.com
NEW YORK (AP) ó A New York City junior high student has been arrested for doodling on her desk with a marker.
Twelve-year-old Alexa Gonzalez scribbled "Lex was here 2/1/10" (A: Oh, thatís terrible. Oh.) on her desk Monday at Junior High School 190 in Queens. She also wrote "I love my friends Abby and Faith."
The girl says the doodles could have been erased. (A: So it was erasable marker.)
Moraima Tamacho says her daughter was released several hours after she was taken in handcuffs to a police station. (A: Is this the society that you are all paying your taxes for? Is it? Is it? What are these teachers these days? What ARE they? What sado-masochistic college did these people get selected from to train? Can you believe that?)
Education department spokesman (A: A spokesman is a PR specialist.) David Cantor said the incident shouldn't have happened, and that common sense should prevail. (A: Well, Ďshouldí isnít good enough is it?)
Last month, the New York Civil Liberties Union filed a lawsuit alleging more than 20 instances of wrongful arrests and assaults by school safety officers. (A: See, once you start getting all these safety officers theyíve got to make work for themselves. They canít put in Ďnothingí reports, just blank reports, nothing happened, nothing happened. Whenever a government or any agency creates another agency theyíve got to start producing. Itís the same with the police. You put them on the roads, theyíve got to start handing out tickets, and then they get quotas. Thatís how it works.)
Gonzalez has been assigned eight hours of community service, a book report and an essay on what she's learned from the experience. (A: She could write a darn good novel on that, labeled under horror. You know.)
Thatís the sort of thing thatís happening. I thought these things were really happening more in Britain that starts it all first you see, and then everybody else copies. Itís actually worse than that. Here is another article with a little boy Patrick.
Laura Timoney fumes after son Patrick, 9,
is busted for bringing 2-inch-long toy gun to PS 52
BY Matthew Lysiak, Kate Nocera and Larry Mcshane / mydailynews.com / February 4th 2010
Patrick Timoney, 9, with (A: It shows him with the littleÖ) plastic gun - barely 2 inches long - that nearly got him suspended after PS 52 Principal Evelyn Mastroianni took action.
An irate Staten Island mom blasted a grade school principal Wednesday for treating her son like a pint-sized Plaxico Burress after he brought a 2-inch-long toy gun to school.
"This principal is a bully and a coward, and needs to be held accountable," said Laura Timoney, 44, after her teary fourth-grader was nearly suspended for playing with the tiny toy at lunch.
"The school should be embarrassed. This is a common-sense issue."
What you are also seeingÖ youíve got to understand how academia trains teachers. Remember, academia is a BIG ARM now OF GOVERNMENT. It has been since really the beginning of World War II. I actually have the papers and documents from big think tanks who discussed this, using universities as a training tool for SOCIAL CHANGE and for SOCIAL INDOCTRINATION. Thatís what theyíve been doing for a long time and so have the primary schools as well. The teachers go into these universities and get a FURTHER conditioning in to it. They themselves, when they see anything at all to do with a plastic gun, have a Pavlovian freak-out response; thatís how theyíre trained and this is what they go and do about it. This is the sort of toy you get in a Lucky Bag in candies. Now, this could also get people killed. Supposing that freaked out teacher did have a fire arm and they see something that looks like something that theyíve beenÖ itís like burned with a poker into their brain Pavlovian style, gunís bad, guns bad, guns badÖ They could have actually shot the child and Iím not kidding about that.
Patrick Timoney, 9, was terrified when he was yanked into the principal's office to discuss the teeny-weeny plastic "weapon."
"The gun was so little," the boy said. "I don't understand why the principal got so upset. I was a little nervous. They made me sign a statement." (A: At 9, eh?) [Alan laughing.]
Patrick and a friend were playing with Lego figures in the school cafeteria on Tuesday when he pulled out the faux machine gun and stuck it in the hands of his plastic police officer. (A: A 2-inch machine gun, eh?)
Boom! Trouble ensued, with Patrick's mom getting a phone call from Public School 52 Principal Evelyn Mastroianni saying her son had somehow gone from straight A's to the NRA.
"I was in disbelief," the still-fuming mother said. "Why didn't anyone step up with an ounce of common sense and put an end to the harassment of my child?" (A: Well these stories are just like avalanching today. They come out in avalanches; you canít keep up with it, there is too muchÖ too much. Itís happening all over the place and in different countries too.)
For those in the States that really donít get it yet that their country is rapidly changing to catch up with the rest, itís already been completely socialized.† Remember, the new system that we have to live in is a COLLECTIVIST/COMMUNIST blend WITH the big corporate big boys and their corporations where capitalism comes together with it and the system is not quite communist and not quite capitalist. Itís actually SOCIALIST. Thatís what Lenin talked about when he said that the state would wither away. He also meant that the state would wither away because through international treaties, through a central body, eventually people would give up every last vestige of their sovereignty and thatís what has happened over the many, many years since the United Nations was set up.
Here are some of the freedoms that you do have in America. Even though they are coming down on it, I heard Hilary Clinton in a newscast once talking about she wanted to end home schooling. They really came down on it all over Europe. An Italian Prime Minster said the reason he was banning it was because he wants every child to have the same Ė and the word in the newspaper said Ė indoctrination, the same indoctrination. This article is from the Telegraph.
German homeschoolers' political asylum in America exposes the EU Gulag
(A: Who would have thunk, eh. Who would have thunk that people would have to RUN to the States to get away from Europe.)
By Gerald Warner World Last updated: February 1st, 2010 / Telegraph.co.uk
The case of the homeschooling couple from Germany who were granted political asylum in the United States, about which Ed West blogged recently, becomes even more interesting if one reads the remarks of the man who granted the Romeikes asylum, Immigration Judge Lawrence O. Burman, of Memphis, Tennessee.
Burman said: ďWe canít expect every country to follow our constitution. The world might be a better place if it did. However, the rights being violated here are basic human rights that no country has a right to violate.Ē (A: Well, itís happening IN the US in a lot of states.) He observed: ďHomeschoolers are a particular social group that the German government is trying to suppress. This family has a well-founded fear of persecutionÖ therefore, they are eligible for asylumÖĒ
Those last remarks might have been uttered in 1933. Do we truly realise the significance of what has happened? Do we understand that, as citizens of the European Union, (A: This is a British paper remember.) we now belong to a totalitarian state from which fleeing citizens are being granted political asylum in the United States? Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, tyranny is back in business in Germany.
Judge Burman added that the scariest thing about this case was the motivation of the German government. He said that, rather than being concerned with the welfare of the children, it was trying to stamp out parallel societies. (A: Thatís exactly right. He is spot on there. Any other way of living, you see, and getting the same or better results than the government is doing themselves. See, totalitarian government can have NO competition, you understand that. They say we shall all be one. There will be ONE world government and ONE system. Every part of its laws, there will be ONE law for each thing and EVERY country across the entire planet will have to follow it ruthlessly. Parallel societies have to be stamped out.) Making his court order, the judge voiced concern that, although Germany was a democratic country and an ally, the policy of persecuting homeschoolers was ďrepellent to everything we believe as AmericansĒ.
That offers a useful insight into how Americans, living in a free country, view the creeping totalitarianism that has engulfed Europe. (A: And it is. Even politicians inside the EU Parliament have said this is a new Soviet state. Itís actually worse.) For this is not just a German issue: we are all helots under state control. Why did the German homeschoolers not seek political asylum in Britain? Because our rulers subscribe to the same tyrannical statist philosophy, is the answer. (A: Theyíve signed away all their sovereignty into the European Union. They take orders from the EU Parliament.) Every possible obstacle is put in the way of homeschooling parents in Britain. (A: They are really persecuting them under the same laws as Germany.)
The mentality is that the state Ė not parents Ė is the natural controller and shaper of childrenís lives and beliefs. (A: That was all through UNESCO at the United Nations.) When a schoolgirl can be given an abortion without her parentsí knowledge, we know that, while public utilities may have been privatised, children have been nationalised. (A: Theyíve privatized utilities but theyíve also nationalized the children.) The Romeikes who fled from Germany objected to their children being forced to follow a curriculum that they believed was anti-Christian. (A: Well, youíve got to read the constitution theyíve got up there at the EU to see that it said right in it that the only religion itís following is SECULAR HUMANISM. They will stand NO competition, no parallel system, no parallel belief.) The same would apply in British state schools, where pornographic sex education is increasingly being made compulsory.
Is that a new idea? Not at all. It was first implemented as government policy in 1919, during the short-lived communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in HungaryÖ (A: Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. I though Iíd let the guitar wail a bit there because you feel like wailing when you read this kind of stuff and you know whatís happening in the world and you know why itís happening and most of the public donít know why itís happening. Under the Laws of the Child, the UN has basically stripped away the rights of the parents. Thatís a good part of whatís happening here. If you home-school theyíll claim, from the major schools that will stand no competition obviously, that you are not socializing your child. I donít know. You know, when you went to school in Britain it was the roughest place you could possibly get thrown into because if you couldnít fight your way out youíd be stamped under. Thatís what they call socializing. To be honest with you it was pretty rough. But no, they want everybody to go under the ONE indoctrination system. This particular journalist here is bang on with it. Itís not often you get people who are bang on and he ties in the communist thing. Heís right. Youíve got to look at the symptoms of a disease and Iíll tell you, when they keep adding up and adding up, youíre right on track and it has merged. It was the big bankers who funded communism; the big boys who started up the biggest corporations, international corporations, who FUNDED communism for the collectivist end product which we are going right into now. He saysÖ
Is that a new idea? (A: This is about the sex education which really is teaching them to be active sexually and into pre-puberty. AGAIN, Huxley even had that in Brave New World, in the book version. And itís here.)
Is that a new idea? Not at all. It was first implemented as government policy (A: Thatís getting the children really involved in sex in pre-puberty.) in 1919, during the short-lived communist dictatorship of Bela Kun in Hungary, when Georg Lukacs, as deputy commissar for ďcultureĒ, enforced his system of Cultural Terrorism, force-feeding children pornographic sex education, teaching them to laugh at their parents and at monogamy (A: Thatís exactly like Brave New World again isnít it?) and to reject the family and religion. Lukacs was a founder of the Frankfurt School of Marxism, (A: All these boys in the Frankfurt School came across to Britain and the US. They wrote lots of books, like Theo Adorno who was right in there with music too. The musicians and Frank Zappa and all these boys were all involved with the Frankfurt School.) later popularised by Herbert Marcuse, whose demented notions are today called Political Correctness and, as such, have colonised Western governments.
It takes the forthright remarks of an American judge, (A: Its true isnít it?) in a country where the culture war has not yet been lost, (A: I donít knowÖ) to bring home to us in Europe that we already inhabit the Gulag. The Berlin Wall did not ďfallĒ Ė it was just moved further west.
Itís bang on because that comes out of the speech that Gorbachev gave when he was President of the Soviet Union and he gave it to the Politburo. Do a search for Eric Margolis; he was the correspondent for the Toronto Sun at the time and he put the speech in the newspaper. Gorbachev said to them, youíll hear that communism is dead; donít believe it. We are moving out into the next phase. This is all here. Thatís all tying together, if you wonder whatís really happening in the world around you.
Years ago when Margaret Thatcher was in, there was an article that came in the paper about once and it really got no comment because it was too stunning to even believe. It was to do with the Island of Skye off the coast of Scotland. Supposedly part of Scotland you see, it always had been and thousands of people lived there and all the rest of it, but it had been sold off by the British government to a multi billionaire from Holland at the time. A few people who thought at the time, scratched their heads and says how can a government sell off part of whatís supposed to belong to the people? You see. Obviously that meant with all the land and houses sitting on it, that somebody was going to pay tribute Ė which is just taxes Ė to some new master. It was not an April Fools joke either because when Maggie Thatcher was in and because of all the other governments before her, and during her time, the International Monetary Fund came inÖ and the World Bank and the whole bunches involved. When the IMF comes in they start running your economy, what you must cut back on, health care, this, that and the other, in order to pay what you owe. They always slash health care first, by the way, and then they go into other areas of social welfare. Part of it is LAND FOR DEBT SWAPS. Something everyone should look into, Land for Debt swaps. It came, again, from the United Nations. I though this wasÖ here again, itís not April the 1st. This is from The Mail Online.
White Cliffs of Dover (A: Everyone knows this song that was made popular as a propaganda song in World War II.) to be sold to the French (A: The French Government.) to help reduce Government's debt (A: The British governmentís debt.)
By Vanessa Allen / 8th February 2010 / Mail Online
For generations Dover has stood as an indomitable symbol of Britainís freedom and independence.
The town, with its white cliffs, port and sprawling castle stood at the very edge of the nationís frontier with the Continent.
But now part of that proud history is up for sale and the leading bidder is revealed as the former age-old enemy Ė France. (A: France really was never an enemy of Britain. It was just the Kings, who were all cousins, that were all fighting each other.)
The Port of Dover is being recommended by Government advisers for sale to the French authorities.
It is one of a string of public assets (A: Do you understand that everywhere, even the town in which you might live, is a public asset. There are many sets of books that the public NEVER get to know the truth of what a country even is. Itís a corporation. Then there are titles which are subdivided down to the local level, corporations. Even your police forces are corporations. They are not in the blue pages where government things should be. They are in the commerce section. So here it saysÖ) It is one of a string of public assets which have been earmarked for privatisation as the Government battles with a record £830billion national debt. (A: Thanks Tony Blair.)
The proposal for the port has prompted outrage.
Prospective Tory MP for Dover Charles Elphicke said: ĎItís clear Gordon Brown (A: Thatís the Prime Minister.) has no sense of the history of our nation or the pride of our town. (A: Well believe you me, Gordon Brown knows EXACTLY whatís going on and so did all his predecessors as well because they had meetings when they were doing the GATT Treaty at the time Ė the General Agreement on Trade and Tariffs Ė they had their meetings in France to do with another aspect and that was the ability for private corporations to come into any country and literally buy up the land for their factories or their plants or whatever else they were doing. There is only ONE documentary ever made and even that was very shallow because they werenít allowing the public in, and that was by the CBC in Canada. I think the rest of the world didnít even know it was happening. Canada, the US and all the different representatives were there. They had been working on it for 4 or 5 yearsÖ and NO ONE was told except through that one little documentary that came out, that this was part of the plan for the future. So it saysÖ)
ĎHow dare he consider selling it all off to the French? Dover is the English border. The people of Dover have a clear message for him Ė hands off our port, hands off the English border.í (A: Thatís a politician speaking and all the oppositions would say the same thing.)
A sale of the Port of Dover, Europeís busiest ferry port, could net up to £350million for the Treasury. Its harbour board applied to the Transport Secretary for voluntary privatisation last month.
The sale is expected to be rubber-stamped and the leading bidder has emerged as Nord-pas-de-Calais regional council, which also owns Calais. (A: So they are going to own all the ports across the planet.) [Alan laughing.]
The French port is just 21 miles away across the Channel and the sale would mark a dramatic reversal in the fortunes of the two towns. (A: See, we are all getting bought and sold and folk donít even know we are getting bought and sold. Bought and soldÖ and the land that you sit onÖ because they must destroy Ė and this is the time for it Ė any remnants of nation statehoodÖ Nation StatehoodÖ for a global society of interdependence.)
As I say, we never know whatís really going on. Little articles come out; theyíre never given much credence or even publicity by the people who should make a stink about it. Hereís another article aboutÖ Here we live in a world and they keep prattling on about this word Ďdemocracy.í Weíve NEVER had democracy. No nation has ever had democracy. ITíS A MYTH. Itís an utter myth when you realize that there are parts of Canada that are technically owned still by the Grovenor family and the Mansfield family and all these big families that came from the Norman descendancy. Still owned! There are parts of the States that technically are still under their dominion yet, because they had the charters from the King long before the Revolution. Theyíve never been changed. Under law everything reverts back to the original title holder if they so claim it. Americans donít know that a good part of theirÖ in fact most of their income taxes go straight through a system to the British Crown and via other places from there. We are mushrooms! Weíre kept in the dark and weíre fed fecal matter.
Here is an articleÖ
Secret summit of top bankers
News.com.au / By George Lekakis and Fleur Leyden From: Herald Sun February 6, 2010 Source: AP
(A: This is the 21st century! When weíre supposedly sending troops across the world to bring in democracy to free these Ďprimitiveí peoples and get rid of their ancient, crazy, silly beliefs and bring in secular humanism and all that stuff. Weíll all be one happy, happy familyÖ of slaves.)
THE world's top central bankers began arriving in Australia yesterday as renewed fears about the strength of the global economic recovery gripped world share markets.
Representatives from 24 central banks and monetary authorities including the US Federal Reserve and European Central Bank landed in Sydney to meet tomorrow (A: So itís already done.) at a secret location, the Herald Sun reports.
Organised by the Bank for International Settlements (A: Here we go again, the Bank for International Settlements.) last year, the two-day talks are shrouded in secrecy with high-level security believed to have been invoked by law enforcement agencies.
Speculation that the chairman of the US Federal Reserve, Dr Ben Bernanke, would make an appearance could not be confirmed last night. (A: So that means he was there.)
The event will be dominated by Asian delegations and is expected to include governors of the Peoples Bank of China, the Bank of Japan and the Reserve Bank of India.
The arrival of the high-powered gathering coincided with a fresh meltdown on world sharemarkets, sparked by renewed concerns about global growth and sovereign debt. (A: Sovereign debt, thatís what theyíre using for selling off parts of Britain.)
Fears countries including Greece, Portugal, Spain and Dubai could default on debt repayments combined with disappointing US jobs data to spook investors.
Australia's ASX 200 slumped 2.4 per cent, to its lowest close since November 5, echoing a sharp fall on Wall Street.
Asian share markets were also pummelled, with Japan's Nikkei 225 down almost 3 per cent and Hong Kong's Hang Seng slumping 3.3 per cent.
The damage was also being felt by European markets last night with London's FTSE 100 down sagging 1 per cent in early trade. (A: Then it goes on about the usual stuff that we donít even understand, with Dow Jones and blah, blah, blah and all that stuff we are not meant to understand because itís all nonsense anyway. Back after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. I think Shawn called back and he can hear me now, so are you there Shawn?
Shawn: Yes I am. How are you tonight?
Alan: No so bad.
Shawn: Good. Iím glad to hear that. You were just speaking of the great con, money, and how we are bought and sold every day and how the serfs go with the land and all those sorts of things. Pretty interesting facts. You know a lot of folk are getting real concerned about the $13 trillion national debt of the US, but thatís only part of it, which is one of the smallest parts of the debt of the US which is actually approaching $50 trillion, double the national debt of the US, is 26 trillion, and that is bond debt. Thatís municipal bonds that people, cities sell to large players that we never hear about.
Alan: We never hear about them.
Shawn: They own whole regions of the country. Anyway, Iíll try to be succinct here. You were talking about indoctrination with the schooling system and those articles that you read; I mean they are justÖ reality is getting stranger and stranger and more stranger than fiction every day.† I think the indoctrination with this digital TV age, digital iPod system, and everything turning digital... Youíve talked about all the flicker rates designed at MIT and all that kind of stuff. You can see people of the United States that watch several hours of TV a day, they are gone.† They are literally goners living in a different reality than I definitely am.
Alan: They are hypnotized. Thereís no doubt about it. They are deliberately hypnotized and downloaded with messages all the time and these particular little slogans, little things they keep repeating in their conversations to their friends, come from television. They are downloaded right into them. They are actually formulated in between all the other words so that you will tune out the other words and youíll hear the little slogans and catch phrases and so on and go green and all that stuffÖ and you just parrot them in your conversations. Itís a simple technique but itís extremely effective.
Shawn: Neuro-linguistic programming.
Alan: Yes, it is.
Shawn: Itís just incredible. As Iíve gotten further into decoding the words and sounds and all those sorts of things and how they affect the brain and how they really direct your thoughts.
Alan: Yes. Without even knowing it.† And most people truly, as Brzezinski said back in the 70s, they will be unable to think or reason for themselves; all they will be able to do is talk about the topics they got from yesterdayís media, from the television. THATíS happened. That HAS happened.
Shawn: Absolutely. You know one of the other things, like I said, as Iíve gotten these codings, I hear a new word, I carry around an unabridged dictionary in my pick-up with me all the time.† But not only that, mainly when I hear a word it almost explodes into pieces and I see the individual letters and I can start putting the prefix and the suffixes and all these things together. Itís really a neatÖ
Alan: Itís a whole science.
Alan: Itís a whole science. It isnít JUST communication. Itís the masters of communication that gave it to us and they use it to its fullest extent and the public are oblivious to it. Thanks for calling, thatís the music coming in now.
Alan: Thank you.
Iíll be back tomorrow night so from Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Environmental Modification Treaty
The Great Global Warming Swindle-Video
Greenhouse Effect Debunked
Gene Test for Couples Planning a Family
12yr.-old Arrested for Doodling
2-inch Toy Gun gets 9yr.-old Busted
German Homeschoolers find Political Asylum in US
Britain-Port of Dover to be Sold off to Pay Government Debt
World's Top Bankers Meet in Australia
Transcribed by Diana