Jan. 15, 2010 (#493)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 15, 2010:

Cultural Cognition Downloads "Your" Decision:

"Cultural Cognition Worked by Many an Expert,
Training You into Future You Never Expect,
You Cope and Adapt, Behaviour Predicted
By Shapers of Ages, Your Mind is Conscripted,
Our Herd Managers? -- Individualism they Fear,
If You're Not Predictable, You're a Rogue Steer,
Two Hundred Years Ago, Elite Formed an Alliance
With Academia, Training Public into Perfect Compliance,
Think You've a Right to Self-Determination?
You're Cradle to Grave Under Observation"
© Alan Watt Jan. 15, 2010


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 15, 2010 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 15th 2010.  For the newcomers, look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site.  Look at all the other sites I have up there, bookmark them for future use, that way when the big sites go down, which they sometimes do, you can always pull up the latest shows for download.  There are:  [listed above].  I always start off the show by rattling the tin can and telling you that you are the audience that brings me to you.  No one is backing me here.  This way Iím not compromised about what I can say and what I canít say.  So itís up to you to keep me going.  The ads on this show are paid directly by the advertisers straight to RBN, which is the radio station that broadcasts the show.  It pays for their air time, their staff and board operators, and some of their bills too.  Itís up to you to keep me going and you can do so by going into cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and purchasing the things I have for sale, the books, CDs and DVDs, or you can donate.  [Ordering and donation options listed above.]  Itís imperative you keep me going.  For those that get the disks burned and passed to them, you can write to me at [address above]. 


This last while Iíve been going on about reality, what we think is reality and how we perceive reality and giving you ideas and clues into the big organizations that work through government agencies working with academia and universities to alter your perceptions, to create the new culture, the culture that is easily managed by those who OWN the countries.  The countries ARE owned.  Every country has its own establishment, as they call it.  The establishment tends to keep out of politics.  They own politics.  Once in a blue moon their names come up in some big business venture perhaps, but theyíre so high up they donít often get mentioned in business ventures because they have whole teams and layers of people dealing with all of their businesses for them.  Yet any one of them can phone up a governmentís head, at any time, and get instantly through to them and tell them if theyíre unpleased about something and what to do to rectify it.  Thatís the real world in which we live.  Itís quite fascinating really, to realize there are different levels of reality, not just the public perception at the bottom, not just the media representation that GIVES us the perceptions at the bottom, not just the academia itself which is also locked into its own little perception level, itís much, much higher levels.


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about perception and reality and those who create our realities.  We donít realize that every generation has been worked on by professionals who work for governments AND the global government, societies and agencies that were set up over 100 years ago to bring about what they call the greater society, the multi-cultural, all kinds of diversity, society. 


Really, what it was about Ė it sounds wonderful when you say multi-cultural and diverse and all the rest of it Ė it was so that no one would hang on to their particular cultures.  Little bits are okay, they can come out at New Yearís time and dress up like dragons or whatever else, but they could not hold on to the VALUES of their cultures.  Gradually they would introduce new parts, new types of a new culture for the whole planet which would make the public more easily managed by those who deemed themselves fit and in the right place, the righteous people, to manage them. 


We live in a society where eugenics rules AND money rules, obviously.  We find that Marxist theology is completely tied in with Darwinism and the right of the intellectuals at the top, who have also gained power AND fortunes throughout generations AND held on to it.  It all tends to support each part of each otherís theory.  Thatís why Marx was really blended with Darwinism.  Thatís why he devoted, I think his 3rd or 4th edition [of the Communist Manifesto], to Darwin.  He wanted to devote the second edition to him but it was a bit too early to bring in THAT kind of new theology mixed with the Darwinistic theologies.  


We find other big players down through the ages who worked for the global system.  They did not come from the working classes or the middles classes; they came from the elite classes.  We know that the big bankers for instance, funded and founded the Cecil Rhodes Foundation AND the Milner Society that blended into the Royal Institute of International Affairs, a PRIVATE organization WAY UP there, actually a more far reaching and hard working group than the Bilderbergers.  They all work together but they do all the think tank work in so many areas of whatís coming up for the big plan.  Bankers set it up, not ordinary people whatsoever, and many of them come from long generation of interbreeding, just like the Darwinís themselves did.  Iíve mentioned so often that the Darwinís, like Charles Darwin, was about the 5th generation of Darwinís that married in to ONE other family, the Wedgwoodís.  Every Darwin married a Wedgwood for generations.  They were already doing special breeding, matching up what they thought were winners with winners.  You could also say psychopaths with psychopaths because descendants can certainly pass on that particular trait.  


Lord Bertrand Russell, in one of his many books, talked about the society they would bring in.  He loved to boast about it and he wrote lots of books.  He said in one of them,


ďThrough DIET (Alan:  through the food that you eat or are given to eat or perhaps limited to eat.) INJECTIONS (A:  Thatís your inoculations.) and INJUNCTIONS will combine from a very early age to produce that sort of character and the sort of BELIEFS that the authorities consider desirable and any serious criticism of the powers the be will become psychologically impossible.  (A:  Understand that?  Any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible.)  Even if all are miserable, all will believe themselves happy because the government will tell them that they are so.Ē


Iíve lived through enough of a life to see so much of this happening with the general public.  Iíve watched the big culture creatorsí move into their shifts to the next part of each part of the society alteration.  Yesterday I talked about Sunstein, the Harvard professor who worked really, with the military-industrial complex and complex psychological problems intended to ALTER and DESTROY not just conspiracy theories or different groups that wouldnít go along with government policies and thatís really what it was, ALL kinds of groups.  You understand, he wasnít just talking about infiltration of conspiracy groups; they are talking about infiltrating ALL right-wings, left-wings, all the rest of it Ė they did that a long time ago by the way Ė and to destroy them by making them UNSURE about what they believed in.  Yesterday I read some of the articles; one of them was from Information Liberation and there was also World Net Daily and also the stuff from the paper that Sunstein put out himself a couple of years ago at Harvard.  Now heís basically the information CZAR Ė everybody is called a CZAR now, because you are in communism Ė under Obama.  In one of the articles, it says hereÖ


Top Obama czar: Infiltrate all 'conspiracy theorists'

Presidential adviser wrote about crackdown on expressing opinions

Posted: January 14, 2010 / By Aaron Klein / WorldNetDaily


Sunstein: "We suggest a distinctive tactic for breaking up the hard core of extremists who supply conspiracy theories (A:  Now, you just take that to your grass roots cultural areas of the world or even parts of a country, rednecks Ė favorite target Ė rednecks, red necks.  They donít even know where rednecks came from.  It was from the first slaves that came over, they were white guys.  Actually they were called redshanks to begin with because they wore breaches and had no stockings coming down to their feet so they were burned; eventually the backs of their necks got burned and they called them red necks.  Thatís how that came about.  First white guys in America were the actual slaves.): cognitive infiltration of extremist groups (A:  Now, whatís an extremist group from the governmentís point of view?  Itís anybody who defies them or any of their policies or any of their cultural changes, as they promote whatever, massive promiscuity amongst pre-pubertal children, whatever.  Thatís called extremist if you oppose them.), whereby government agents or their allies (acting either virtually or in real space, and either openly or anonymously) will undermine the crippled epistemology of believers by planting doubts about the theories and stylized facts that circulate within such groups, thereby introducing beneficial cognitive diversity."  (A:  Now, how have they got this down to a fine art?  Well you see, the same people that Sunstein and his predecessors were involved in were attacking the religions that helped give you the values of a unified culture.  Theyíve been at this for CENTURIES folks, centuries.)


Sunstein said government agents "might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action."  (A:  You neutralize them all.  Iíve told you before, thereís not a chat room out there or a forum that isnít top-heavy with agents.  So even if you start off with your facts right, youíll be infiltrated.  Some person with a strong personality Ė thatís how they will be seen by the others Ė will start putting good information in and then bend it around in so many different ways and then have you all fighting each other and getting you to attack certain people like me, by the way, which does happen.  Youíll get used for that purpose because youíre not thinking for yourself.)


In this vein of perceptions, hereís a great article here from a business magazine that works with big pharma.  Itís the Fierce Biotech.  Iíve read from it before.  Hereís exactly what Iím talking about.  The same Sunstein technique, the Harvard University bunch, and this comes from Yale University, this particular look into how they are going to alter your perceptions about inoculations. 


Who's Afraid of the HPV Vaccine?

By ejones - Published on FierceBiotech (http://www.fiercebiotech.com) - January 13, 2010


(A:  Thatís the Human Papilloma VIRUS that they claim is going to help prevent cancer even though there are hundreds of them that can cause the cancers and supposedly theyíve targeted 2.  What we do have in factual data, itís killed a lot with anaphylactic shock, a lot of people who have got it already.  The long-term effects have still to come inÖ and they will suppress them for years.)


View a Webcast with Dan Kahan of Yale University.  (A:  By the way, this guy worked with Sunstein before.)


A new study concludes that people tend to match their risk perceptions about policy issues with their cultural values (A:  So you judge your risk perceptions about what you are told by government and agencies with your cultural values, exactly what Iíve been telling you.), which may explain the intense disagreement about proposals to vaccinate elementary-school girls against human-papilloma virus (HPV). The study also says people's values shape their perceptions of expert opinion on the vaccine.


HPV is a widespread disease that, when sexually transmitted, can (A:  I like the word Ďcan.í) cause cervical cancer. (A:  Itís not the only cause.  There are a lot of causes.)  In October of 2009, the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended that the vaccine be given to all girls ages 11 or 12. However, the recommendation has been mired in controversy, and so far adopted in only one state and the District of Columbia.


An online experiment involving more than 1,500 U.S. adults reveals that individuals who have cultural values (A:  Hereís how they word this.  Listen very carefullyÖ) that favor authority and individualism (A:  What did I tell youÖ at the UN, the ENEMY to their world state is the individual.  Here theyíre linking it by association with authority.  If youíre an individual and you stand up for say America or your country, youíre nationalistic, you like authorityÖ bad word, you see.  They are so clever, so clever.  You are dealing with psycholinguistics here.)  perceive the vaccine as risky (A:  So if you have cultural values that favor authority and individualism, youíll perceive the vaccine as risky.), in part because they believe it will lead girls to engage in unsafe sex. (A:  Well, isnít that the reason for giving that to young children who are getting told by the state through all their schooling and all the cultural values put out by the media and Hollywood, to engage in unsafe sex?  Well, we know that but Iím going to continue to show you how itís done and put across to you and what theyíre going to DO about you after this break.)


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  Some one just emailed me and they think there is too much compression thatís on the board side, maybe RBN, maybe put the treble up a little bit and less compression because itís coming across that way.  It kind of muffles things a bit.  This is live, folks.  This is what happens. 


Reading this article here again from Fierce Biotech as itís called, showing what they intend to do, how they are going to alter your perceptions.  Even in their write-up you know that one of these psycholinguistic experts have put this together to already alter and attack your belief system and your culture and so on, or your stance on something.  This one here takes on, in particular, the HPV vaccine that they are pushing on young girls and now they want to push on boys, on behalf of big pharmaÖ because they love us, you understand.  It says hereÖ


The study was funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) (A:  So thereís your government into it again.) and is being published online this week in the journal Law and Human Behavior. It found that people exposed to unattributed, balanced information about HPV vaccines tended to produce something called "biased assimilation," a phenomenon in which culturally-identifiable groups draw opposing conclusions and become more divided rather than less divided as they consider evidence.


But when biased assimilation was compared to another survey result, researchers were surprised. "An even bigger effect for all subjects was the perceived values of experts," said Yale University law professor Dan Kahan referring to another part of the experiment in which arguments about the vaccine were matched with fictional experts. 


Iím going to go IN to this particular site which this Kahan runs to show you.  And what is it?  Itís the Cultural Cognition Project.  You know, the people havenít a clue, they havenít got a clue where their opinions, where their fashion, where their mode of action within society, they havenít got a clue where the ideas in their head even come from or why they are there.  You know that?  They really, really donít.


The Cultural Cognition Project



The Cultural Cognition Project is a group of scholars interested in studying how cultural values shape public risk perceptions and related policy beliefs. (A:  Thatís government policy, folks.)  Cultural cognition refers to the tendency of individuals to conform their beliefs about disputed matters of fact (e.g., whether global warming is a serious threat; whether the death penalty deters murder; whether gun control (A:  Theyíre working on gun control too, for the federal government.) makes society more safe or less) (A:  They will muddy the waters until you wonít know what you believe anymore.) to values that define their cultural identities. (A:  Because the intent is to destroy all the old cultural identities.  We are living through it; weíve been living through it for years.Project members are using the methods of various disciplines -- including social psychology, anthropology, communications, and political science -- to chart the impact of this phenomenon and to identify the mechanisms through which it operates. The Project also has an explicit normative objective: to identify processes of democratic decisionmaking by which society can resolve culturally grounded differences in belief in a manner that is both congenial to persons of diverse cultural outlooks and consistent with sound public policymaking.  (A:  So, sound public policymaking, which is the agenda, is what everything is based on.  If youíre not going along with it, they are going to find ways, and they already have the ways to make you quite unsure of where you stand on things.)


Below are examples of CCP studies and research projects.  (A:  That are ongoing.)


HPV Vaccine Risk Perceptions


Is the controversy over the mandatory vaccination of school girls for HPV a cultural one? Yes, because what and whom individuals believe about the risks and benefits of the vaccine, experimental data show, are shaped by their cultural commitments. This is the conclusion of a CCP study published in Law & Human Behavior.  (A:  They say that people who are individualistic are therefore also authoritarian, meaning national, meaning you believe in a culture, they are the most resistant to it.  In other words, you are a redneck, you see.  Whereas people who are really egalitarian, communitarian-minded and egalitarian are more prone to accept whatever is given out as new; they are happy to try new things.)


Supreme Court on Use of Deadly Force


Based on a video shot from inside a police cruiser, the U.S. Supreme court concluded "no reasonable juror" could find that the risk posed by a fleeing motorist did not warrant deadly force to stop him. But a study by the Cultural Cognition Project published in the Harvard Law Review finds perceptions of risk among persons who viewed the tape varied dramatically with those persons' cultural worldviews.  (A:  Now, this Yale guy is also in with The Harvard Law Review, publishing his stuff too, for the law courts, and showing you how people get their particular world views and how to alter, distort or actually destroy them.) 


Gay and Lesbian Parenting

A majority of Americans believe that custody issues (including adoption placement) should be resolved in favor of the best interests of the child, but they disagree over what impact gay or lesbian parenting has on child welfare. 


This is where all the stuff gets promoted through.  First through academia, working with government policies, and with the UN because they are the masters for the global culture that they are bringing in and then they find ways through media, entertainment, novels and through schooling to get the kind of society that they want.  You see, you are plastic, technically you donít deserve to have a mind of your own, you really donít.  Like the article that I read at the beginning of the show from Lord Bertrand Russell, YOU should have the mentality and the personality and the culture that theyíve given to you, to be a good citizen.  Thatís what that means.  Thatís what that means folks.  And those that donít want to go along with it all, what will they do about it?  Well, Iíve told you for years that the big boys - the big, big boys - promote and theyíve actually funded The New Age into existence.   What is the New Age really?  Itís a substitute for the OLD religions that gave you your cultural values.  Itís the new communal one.  Iíll be back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.  Reading articles to do with how we perceive things and that tell you that most people donít even know that what they think and what they perceive are two different things.  The perception itself is GIVEN to you; itís formulated in a certain way which will give you a particular type of opinion. 


The New Age comes into this too.  The New Age was meant to bring in a wishy-washy multitude of anything-goes religion type thing, no rules, regulations, do as you want, and that fulfills the need for peopleís spirituality.  They say you can take people out of religion but you canít take religion out of the people, so they have to give you a substitute and thatís why they came in with the New Age, a massive, well financed, well planned onslaught with a differentÖ  Itís almost like a supermarket of the New Age, whatever your personality is, whatever you want and the time, you can go shopping for it and itís there.  However, thereís no cohesion amongst any of them on anything except for being good; feel good, stay of out everything, donít bother about politics and heavy things like that, leave all the big things to the big boys, itís nothing to do with you, just be happy and enjoy, wave your hands, in a field, wear gowns, and play flutes and stuff on a nice sunny day.  Thatís what they give you so they can manage you much more perfectly.  We forget that religion in the past was a major force on holding cultures together, where theyíd actually stand up and fight for it and any tyrant that tried to take over was immediately put down by mass force from the people themselves.  So thatís an enemy of the cultural creators.  Thatís why theyíve given you this.


One of the big women who was in the New Age was Barbara Marx Hubbard.  Amazing name that, Marx Hubbard, isnít it?  Out of one of her books she said this, it takes in evolution, it takes in the transgenic movement, how the better ones will move into the next system, the old ones will die off, and must die off, because after all, they were using a sort of Hindu philosophy for their particular religion.  In Hinduism they believe that they have WAVES of time, waves of theology and so on, or theosophy.  At the end of an age, those who have evolved highest must go on but they canít bring those who have not evolved along with them.  Itís basicÖ thatís what Darwinism is based on by the way, a very ancient pantheistic belief system.  This is what Barbara Marx Hubbard said; Iíll try and impersonate her, because they love to talk in a certain way. 


"Out of the full spectrum of human personality, one-fourth is electing to transcend . . . (A:  Aaaah, transcend.) One-fourth is resistant to election. They are unattracted by life ever-evolving . . . . Now, as we approach the quantum shift from creature-human to co-creative human . . . (A:  See, theyíre all going to be Gods.)  the destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body . . . . (A:  Iíll repeat that last part again for the hard of thinking.  The destructive one-fourth must be eliminated from the social body . . . .)  Fortunately you, dearly beloveds, are not responsible for this act. We are. We are in charge of God's selection process for planet Earth. He selects, we destroy. We are the riders of the pale horse, Death."


Thatís Barbara Marx Hubbard, a woman who had access to all Presidents, Prime Ministers, went to all global meetings, UN and so on.  That was from her book, New Age Religious leader, The Book of Co-Creation, written in 1980, Part III, page 59. 


Itís amazing.  Data, there is so much data given out to the public, so much that they canít keep a hold of it all coming in.  99% of all data that we get on a daily basis is completely irrelevant to us.  It is MEANT to overload you so that you donít think through the processes of whatís controlling you, guiding you, whatís altering YOUR behavior.  Remember what Skinner said himself, the behaviorist, that to alter peopleís behavior, you must alter something within their environment.  The cameras alone that watch you, the CCTV cameras, they also alter the way you behave in public.  Youíre not spontaneous anymore.  A spontaneous, happy act in a little group might be considered some sort of unsociable act by those who are watching; they might send a SWAT team down thinking something is going on.  You become more straight-faced, you are on camera so you cannot be spontaneous.  Your behavior is already altering and they are using YOU and your knowledge that you are being watched TO ALTER YOURSELF.  Thatís the technique thatís being used.


Remember, what I talk about tonight, all the links will be up on my site cuttingthroughthematrix.com and you can go and check them out.  I think the sound is getting better because I had to alter this board on my end here. 


I really wish that people would understand how altered we are and where they plan to go with it all, until ANYTHING GOES, you will think anything goes and you are all going to be freer but in actuality thereís no cohesion and no cohesive act can possibly happen amongst you then.  You are segregated really, from each other.  You wonít stand up for any values in common and then you are easily managed by big government.  Remember what Orwell said, when they come for you and they speak down to you Ė in the beginning of 1984 Ė where the screen in the home looks right down to you, thatís government talking right down to you; there is no one else around you, no neighbor, no relative, no one to stand up as a group FOR you on your behalf.  HG Wells said the same thing.  When they have that achieved, that situation, then there is no opposition to government policy.  Complete alteration of the cultures. 


Weíre all living through it.  Most folk donít even know itís happening.  There is not even a single comedy you can watch, especially comedies, where whatever is the new political correctness is not slipped in there.  You cannot sit back and watch a comedy, youíll find it everywhere. 


Getting back to this article here on the culture creators from the University, this guy that runs the Yale combined with the Harvard project, heís got an article here called Synthetic Biology Risk Perceptions.


The Cultural Cognition Project



Synthetic Biology Risk Perceptions

Public consciousness of the promise and perils of synthetic biology is only now beginning to emerge.  In a project funded by the National Science Foundation (SES-0922714), the Cultural Cognition Project will conduct a series of experimental studies aimed at anticipating how values could influence synthetic biology risk perceptions and how information should be communicated to assure that public (A:  Thatís what they call it, youíre being Ďassuredí when they alter your perceptions.) deliberations about the development of synthetic biology are informed by the best available scientific information.  (A:  Which means perception changers.  Itís quite fascinating to go through what theyíre really up to.  These guys also, by the way, work through the Futurist Society, the novelists, the various author societies, scriptwriters for television, Hollywood; everyone involved in giving you what you think is your normal culture.  There is nothing normal about it, around it, in it, at allÖ hasnít been for an awful, AWFUL long time.)


Pravda put an article out on the false H1N1 pandemic. 


H1N1, the False Pandemic

13.01.2010 Source: Pravda.Ru


Wolfgang Wodarg, Head of Health at the Council of Europe, considers that the A H1N1 scare was a ďcampaign of panicĒ, a ďfalse pandemicĒ, ďone of the great medicine scandals of the centuryĒ and claims that the vaccines, based on cancerous cells (A:  Thatís what theyíre using.), spell the chilling message ďthere is worse to comeĒ.


For Wolfgang Wodarg, the pandemic of A H1N1, which started as Mexican Flu, then Swine Flu, was no more and no less than a campaign to create a false notion of insecurity for the pharmaceutical companies to cash in. ďThe great campaign of panic we have seen provided a golden opportunity for representatives from labs who knew they would hit the jackpot in the case of a pandemic being declared,Ē he declared.


Claiming that the ďpandemicĒ is ďone of the great medicine scandals of the century,Ē Dr. Wodarg has called for an enquiry. The resolution he proposed for an investigation into the role of the pharma companies in the A H1N1 story has been passed by the Council of Europe, which is based in Strasbourg. An emergency debate will be held at the end of January. 


Weíre living in the creation of mass panic.  Weíre in the times of crisis creation with the guys - like the last guy I talked about at Yale University and guys in Harvard - working to help bring this about.  Many other Universities too, mind you, have HUGE grants from the big foundations and from governments to work on these particular projects.  We are played like fish, we truly are.  Weíre played like fish who are starving in a pond.  These guys have all these kinds of lures for baits and they test different ones to find out which one works the quickest and the cheapest for them, for us all to alter OUR behavior and to take the bait.


New Sex Hormone FoundóMay Lead to Male Birth Control?

A new hormone discovery could help pave the way to a male birth control pill.

Rachel Kaufman for National Geographic News / January 11, 2010


(A:  New sex hormone, quite an interesting article.)

A new human sex hormone has been found, a new study says. The naturally occurring substance could lead to the long-sought male birth control pill, researchers cautiously speculate.  (A:  Why do they need it since all the males in the Western world, according to the UN, are becoming sterile anyway?  They just donít know WHY, in fact thereís no inquiry to find out, which means they know whatís causing it because itís supposed to be that way.  [Alan laughing.]  So now theyíre into theÖ)


Gonadotropin-inhibitory hormone (GnIH)ófirst identified in birds about a decade agoówas recently discovered in the hypothalamus of the human brain. The hypothalamus produces hormones that regulate sleep, sex drive, body temperature, and more.  (A:  I wonder what the Ďmoreí is?  So theyíre going into this to see if they can create another way to create a birth control system for males.  They wonít need it in the Western countries though because weíve almost had it here.  Again, what was it Russell said?  By the needle and the food supply and so on, they shall create the kind of population that they want.  Well, theyíre pretty well here I would say.)


This article here too, it falls in with what Iím saying as well.  Interesting too, the guys who are trying to spin your perceptions are working with all kinds of things to promote homosexuality, gay and so on; youíll see that all on their site.  This is from the government, Yale and Harvard working together.  Itís mainly to do with depopulation because people who are heterosexual tend to produce children and they donít want children being produced in this day and age.  Julian Huxley who was the first CEO of UNESCO Ė Iíve read this on the air Ė from his own book said, they would bring in a society of massive promiscuity but no one will breed children, so youíll be happy but basically neutered.  Well, weíre almost there.  They donít want populations you see.  They already know what their ideal population on the earth should be, to suit the new system that Barbara Marx Hubbard was pointing out was coming in and she was promoting.  Itís down to about less than 2 billion; some say even 2 million would suit them fine. 


This is from CNSNews.com.


Pro-Life Advocates Plan to Protest Opening

 of Largest Abortion Clinic in U.S.

Wednesday, January 6, 2010 / By Penny Starr, Senior Staff Writer / CNSNews.com


Pro-life activists and religious leaders plan a rally (A:  See, these are the people whoíve got cultural values and probably like authoritarian societies, according to the experts who are working to destroy this.  They will.  Theyíll get in and muddy up what you think was your foundation of your beliefs until youíre not quite sure anymore.  Thatís what they do.)  near a six-story building that formerly housed a bank. The cash-register-shaped building is being renovated into an abortion facility by Planned Parenthood.  (A:  Margaret Sangerís bunch, the great hero of the feminist movement.  The feminist movement didnít come from the grass roots; it was promoted from the top, the big foundations with massive money backing it.  It wasnít little peasant women at the bottom either, and it wasnít even the lower middle classes.  It was, again, the rich at the very top who got the whole thing rolling by guys like Bernays in charge of it, who also taught the same women to smoke and drink booze and be like men.  It says hereÖ)


(CNSNews.com) Ė A coalition of pro-life advocates and religious leaders plan to gather in Houston on Jan. 18 to oppose what is expected to be the largest abortion clinic in the country.


Planned Parenthood is renovating a former bank, turning it into a 78,000 square foot facility that will include a surgical wing equipped to provide late-term abortions(A:  Thatís the last trimester theyíre talking about here.)


ďItís an abortion super center,Ē Lou Engle, founder of the pro-life group The Call to Conscience, which is organizing the rally, told CNSNews.com.


Joining Engle at the ďprayer marchĒ will be Tony Perkins, president of the Family Research Council, and Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference. Religious leaders expected to attend include Bishop Harry Jackson, senior pastor of Hope Christian Church; Richard Land, president of the Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission of the Southern Baptist Convention; Star Parker, president of the Coalition for Urban Renewal and Education; and Abby Johnson, the former director of a Planned Parenthood clinic.


Engle compared the fight for the rights of the unborn to another critical movement in America. ďAs Martin Luther King, Jr. said, ĎIt is time to subpoena the conscience of America,íĒ he said.  (A:  The conscience of America has been almost destroyed by the previous articles and the guys who work in the big academia movements along with government over the last, especially 60 years, to be honest with you.)


For those who pooh-pooh just the religions, remember, right now there is nothing else standing up between life and the VALUE of life for YOU.  There is nothing standing up against that, against big government and big foundations that want to vastly reduce the populations.  And think about it too, what that guy said, Sunstein, how they would go IN and infiltrate different groups, make them begin to question their basic beliefs on anything.  You see, these are the same guys, the Sunsteins, who has been at this for an awful long time by the way - if you look at his biography - that helped destroy the cultural religious values the people already had.  Do you understand, I hope, what Iím saying?  Itís very, very important.  Iíll be back with more after this break.


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix.  Itís hard for most folk to imagine that the system they are born into was created for them by experts.  Just like the ones who are being born today are going to grow up into Sunsteinís brave new world, and all the other characters who work at Yale and Harvard and all the big institutions that get masses of government and private money, including money from the Pentagon, to work on modifying human behavior.  You see, in a post-war global society they have to bring in a brand new culture of OBEDIENCE, obedient people across the world. 


Itís the INDIVIDUAL who stands up for rights.  Itís the INDIVIDUAL that stands up for what he or she thinks is right or wrong.  And that must basically be eliminated.  They donít want individuals at all.  Getting back to what I said, the UN has declared that the INDIVIDUAL is their major threat to world peace.  Mao Tse-Tung said he wasnít afraid of artilleries or armies or bombs, he was afraid of someone with an IDEA, an idea that would spread like wildfire.  That is what weíre living through.  Your parents were born into their phase of it too; the culture was already created for them, which was different from their grandparents.  Weíve been taught that weíre somehow evolving along and that culture itself just alters here and there by itself, like some will-of-the-wisp, and NOTHING CAN BE FURTHER FROM THE TRUTH. 


If you were to look back into the Middle Ages and right up into the 20th century, people were singing folk songs that were sung HUNDREDS of years ago by their great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents.  Nothing much changed.  During a feudal system Ė and Iím not advocating that by any chance but the elite certainly are, they want a new feudal system as Professor Carroll Quigley said Ė nothing much changed.  So culture changes because itís designed and promoted and directed by those who want power or those who have been brought in to create the new system, a world of experts. 


You should see the movie, if you can get a hold of it, of Brave New World.  I think it was made in 1980 or 1982.  Itís very difficult to get a hold of.  If you do get a hold of it, burn me a copy of it please.  Youíll see what the society is supposed to be that they would bring in.  Written by Aldous Huxley who sat IN on to think tanks and he did not necessarily go along with it all; he was the brother of Julian.  Julian was the utter control freak; thatís why they put him in as the head of the United Nations UNESCO.  UNESCO was designed to bring in a common culture for the global society that they said themselves would be drastically, drastically different from any culture that had been before.  It meant the elimination basically, of all previous cultural and nationalistic values. 


Weíre living through it now folks and most folk donít even know how we got here.  Weíre told to have fun.  We have people now who are middle aged and even elderly and all they talk about is whatís on television when theyíre in their death beds.  They have no wisdom to pass on to anyone because literally, theyíve never had enough peace and quite through their lives.  Theyíve been entertained their whole lives long and so they have no wisdom that theyíve come up with themselves or insights to pass on to the youth.  Thatís how you destroy the cultures.  Thatís why you separate the generations.  Itís been very effective up until this moment. 


From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.



Topics of show covered in following links:


Obama Regulatory Czar-Infiltrate all Conspiracy Theorist Groups

How Government and Business Policies are Peddled to Peasants

Perception Changers

Pravda on False Pandemic

New Hormone Found-Possibly leading to Male Contraception

Largest US Abortion Clinic Ever Under Way-Abortion Super Centre




Transcribed by Diana