Sept. 1, 2009 (#398)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Sept. 1, 2009:

Banking Con-Fidence is Stealing Licence:

"Confidence Men, Down through the Ages,
Run the Banking, Give Pittance Wages,
Then, When Enough Cash is in the Kitty,
And the Public Thinks it's Sitting Pretty,
Bankers Hold Secret Convention,
Steal the Cash, Cause Depression,
Fat Greedy Men, Power-Mad Knavery,
Pulled it Off, We're All in Slavery,
In Ancient Times, the Land of Punt
Used Priestly Government as a Front
To Shield the Rich Merchant Class
Who Lent the Gold, Bold as Brass"
© Alan Watt Sept. 1, 2009


Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Sept. 1, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on September the 1st 2009.  The newcomers to the show should look in to web site, bookmark all the other sites I have up there because there will be trouble with the big servers in the near future.  I know, Iíve had it in the past.  Bookmark the other sites, then you can always download the latest shows if anything happens.  Plus, if you get sticking when youíre downloading, itís because too many people are going into the .com site at the same time.  So if you try one of the other sites it should be easier.  [listed above]  Thereís also; this is the European site which has the same audios as the others but it also has transcripts of quite a few of the shows written in the various languages of Europe, for print up and to pass around to your friends. 


I always tell people that this is probably the only show where the listeners themselves bring me to them.  This is not a business.  Itís not an empire-building thing.  Itís not a career.  Itís really an urgency, something that must be done.  Thatís why Iím on the air.  I depend upon you, the listeners, to keep me going.  You can do it by buying the books and so on that I have for sale.  Theyíre different kinds of books.  I donít go into just the general histories of things, I show you how weíre being CONNED for probably thousands of years.  People thousands of years ago - theyíve said this too - they had the same size skulls as we do today.  They certainly used them.  Knowledge was very ancient, even in ancient times.  Wise men have always been around who knew how to con the public.  Thatís really what history is.  Itís just minorities of elites, power mongers, bringing a system in to get everyone dependent on it, called money.  Once thatís done, they simply ride on the backs of the public and guide the public wherever they want them to goÖ to gain more power for themselves.  Thatís all we are, really.  Thatís what historyís all about. 


You never see in fictional dramas or docudramas, as they like to call them today, how the peasants lived.  Itís just not exciting enough.  Itís always how the rich lived in the Middle Ages and royalty and so on, right up to the present.  Really, to the historians thatís all thatís important; and to those that rule the world, thatís all thatís important too.  One peasant is exchangeable for another peasant regardless of what country or groups of countries theyíre ruling over.  Therefore I go into different angles and show you how cons work throughout history and how coding works as well.  These guys, like Albert Pike said, never speak so plainly as when they do in public, itís just that the public never understand what theyíre actually saying.  Everything in the language is coded. 


So look in to my site.  Youíll see how to buy the books, get the disks and so on.  You can also to donate to me through PayPal.  For those in the US and Canada, you can send personal check or money order to me.  Outside the Americas, thereís Money Gram and Western Union.  Some people just send cash.  For those who get the disks burned and passed to them, write to me at [listed above].  As I say, thatís very important that you keep it going if youíre getting something out of what Iím saying.  I donít dizzy you with UFOs or tell you to take drugs and get out-of-body experiences.  I think thereís different answers to this.  Youíve got to understand whatís going on.  Back with more after these messages. 


Hi folks.  This is Alan Watt.  Weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  The matrix is a good term really, a good name for this show because itís the reality that weíve been given.  All reality comes through a channel, you might say, censored and worked out by the big boys to make sure we all get the same indoctrination worldwide.  Thatís what the global village is all aboutÖ to make sure weíre all in Platoís cave.  Again, even the Platoís cave analogy is very, very good to do with the matrix because Plato gives you an example of people who were brought up in a cave.  Thatís all they knew was the cave.  They couldnít turn around to see the entrance to the cave so their back always faced the entrance.  They saw the shadows of the sun as the sun passed the cave entrance every so often.  Any animals outside, even people walking past, cast shadows at the back of the cave.  Thatís all they could see.  So their reality was made up of philosophies and a kind of religion to do with what caused all of these shadows and the movement that seemed to be at the back of the cave.  Their whole reality, their reason for life or existence, etc, was all founded on the fact that they were born and raised in a cave.  Thatís all they knew.  Then one guy eventually broke free, got out into the big world and he came back and says, you know we all were wrong about everything, EVERYTHING.  Everything, all the summaries about the causes of the shadows and so on and the shapes that we see in the back of the cave are ALL completely bogus.  Theyíre all wrong.  Once he explained to them how the big the world was, they wanted to kill himÖ for shattering their reality. 


Thatís what the matrix is too.  Itís no different than the newswires.  Thereís 2 main newswires for the whole planet, really just one.  Itís well understood and itís published knowledge that the Rothschilds own Reuters, the big one.  All the other newspapers take their stories from that.  They also know what to avoid if they come across their own stories.  Because if itís not authorized by Reuters - I call it Routers because they route the news - then it might be dangerous to print something thatís not IN a Reuters story.  So whenever you copy from Reuters is authorized and so they feel safe with that.  They run with it.  Thatís how simple it is to give a whole world a reality. 


They also use education.  Thatís what UNESCO is for at the United Nations.  Iíve urged people to go into the writing of the first CEO of UNESCO and read what its actual goals are.  It was to take over the entire educational system of the planet and to indoctrinate children into a totally different way of livingÖ uncontaminated by their parentsí old-fashioned, moralistic ideas.  Julian Huxley, thatís the man.  You should get a hold of his books and read them thoroughly.  He laid the future down straight, for those that want to read his books.  Big player.  He sat in on all the big think tanks that planned the next 100 years, even back then, and beyond, as his brother did too, Aldous Huxley.  You think about them, really.  Iíve gone through the Huxleys and how they go right back to Darwins and Sir Thomas Huxley, the best friend of Darwin and how eventually they were intermarried, etc.  Their descendants, all the same families descendants are still running the think tanks today and the Optimum Population Trust for reducing population.  Itís astonishing, really. 


Itís so funny too, in a sense, that weíve all heard about nut cases and conspiracies for years and years and years, mentioning certain family names, etc and only to find out that itís TRUE.  Now, everything really is out in the open.  Itís all true.  Itís just that nobody really cares now.  Thatís the sad part about it.  As I said at the beginning of the show, thatís all history is.  Itís just the stories of the continuities of certain families down through hundreds or thousands of years riding on the backs of peasants whom they kept in line with terror, basically.  They used to have weekly beheadings.  Youíd get hung, then youíd get drawn and quartered.  Horrible deathsÖ just to make sure the peasants all got the message.  Thatís how the world has been run. 


Now, itís run by psychology mainly, and propaganda, plus a universal standard education system.  Thatís what Lenin said theyíd bring in.  Karl Marx advocated it too.  Lenin, then Stalin said that theyíd really have to pay the teachers very, very well, indeedÖ and the police and the military, to keep everyone in check for this new world order.  These are the terms THEY use, the new world order.  Stalin used it.  So did Adolf Hitler.  Then we find that the Fabian Mr. Brown used it, the Prime Minister of Britain at the G20 meeting.  Itís up on YouTube; youíll hear him say it himselfÖ the new world order.  Everybody who used that term in the past, when we quoted them, people would laugh at it because they wouldnít hear it on mainstream.  It wasnít just that they couldnít hear it, itís just that they donít hear anything that matters on mainstream.  Theyíre more into the trivia.  Thatís what they rememberÖ and Hollywood entertainment and Michael Jackson and so on. 


These people, of course, are the PERFECTLY CONDITIONED.  The ones Iím talking about.  This is what democracy HINGES on.  That MOST of the people can be conned completely, fooled, and brainwashed completely into their matrix; into their Platoís cave.  It works very well.  Iíve got an audio on my archives section on my web site of Aldous Huxley giving a speech at Berkley where he talked about the percentage of the population who are suggestible.  He said that simple suggestion works on about 20% of the public immediately, or even 40% I think.  It could even be 60%.  It was a BIG number.  Then he said with a bit more intense suggestion, another 20% will fall under.  So it was 60%, then 20%.  He says but 20%, they have a hard time with the last 20%Ö getting them to come under the spell of suggestion, which is like mild hypnosis.  But most folk, letís say 60%, are instantly suggestible.  They will question NOTHING that comes across the mainstream media. 


Thatís what Brzezinski was talking about in his book Between Two Ages.  Where he says people will be unable to THINK OR EVEN REASON FOR THEMSELVES unless itís on the mainstream media.  Thatís happened.  Therefore, if you tell them something outside the box thatís not on the mainstream media, they really will think youíre crazy.  They do think the media, the mainstream television and the major shows they see, they really do believe itís like part of the family, like itís a relative thatís talking to them night after night on the news.  They really do believe this.  Theyíve never even considered theyíre being lied to.  Thatís the majority of the public.  Thatís the perfectly conditioned. 


Thatís what democracy hinges on.  The elite know that particular group will always swing in favor of what the big boys want them to think or do or how to vote and so on.  Or even just to accept laws, for instance, without anger or indignation.  Thatís what they count on. Thatís why they chose democracy.  This term democracy has different meanings for the new world order.  You can count on the bulk of the populous who are completely conditioned. 


Their only problem has been the ones who canít be, the ones who are a bit wiser - for some reason their conditioning, their inoculations didnít kill off enough brain cells or something - can still see whatís going on.  Theyíve always given them a problem down through the centuries.  Therefore, thatís why youíre getting all the surveillance, personal surveillance, to find out not just who they are but to keep tabs on everybody.  Iíve no doubt about it at all, little lights will blink on in their main computers at central command when someoneís putting out real intelligence to someone else of real intelligence.  Thatís what itís all about.    Theyíre quite happy with the 60% who are brain dead.  Thereís no problem from them.  Theyíll do what ever theyíre told.  If theyíre told to line up and get shotsÖ of cyanide, theyíll do it as long as you tell them itís good for them.  It will happen.  Itís the ones who say, ĎIím not going to have that,í that are the problem. 


Itís interesting too that Lord Bertrand Russell advocated KILLING, EXTERMINATING those children who were very, very intelligent, who could not be brought in, under sponsorship BY the elite and given special schooling.  He said, most of the time up until his day thatís what theyíd done.  Theyíd given them scholarships to special schools and so on.  Once they started to feel important and part of a more elite group and then their pay packets came in eventually when they left universities, they would never leave that clique.  But he said they would have to emotionally detach themselves from their family roots because they came from poor, lower-class values.  However, he says for those children who could not be bribed over, he says, weíd have to extirpate them.  Eradicate them.  Because ONE or TWO people saying the right things with intelligence and facts to back it up in a certain way, that even those who are under perfect conditioning can understand, the spell can be broken.  Therefore, theyíre very dangerous people.  Very dangerous.  Itís always been that way.  Thatís why they go after those who have the ability to just simply point out what really is.  Thatís all youíre doing is pointing out what really is, to those who are under the spell and suggestion of how itís supposed to be.


Weíve all been looted.  Itís incredible that even in the 20sÖ I said this last night.  Theyíre showing old documentary clips of the riots that took place in the 20s when the big bankers looted the public.  Today thereís nothing.  Have you noticed thereís nothing at ALL?  Thereís no demonstrations in the streets.  Be back with more after this break. 


Hi folks.  Iím Alan Watt.  Weíre Cutting Through The Matrix.  Just talking about reality and suggestion and what it boils down to is confidence.  A con man is a CONfidence man.  Thatís what it means.  He must get your confidence before he can rip you offÖ with a charming manner as well.  Theyíre very charming people generally.  Thatís what puts you at ease with them.  Thatís why youíre conned; you have confidence in them. 


Thatís also what politicians are all about and how they create personas for them by the big marketing companies.  They give them personalities for the public but itís not the real personality.  Theyíre just actors.  The idea is that youíve got to have confidence.  For the left wing and the right wing, theyíll give you the appropriate con man.  Thatís why the system has lasted so long, really.  It shouldnít have lasted so long because itís been so transparent at times.  In fact, itís been shattered so many times and it still works as long as someone else comes along, a new guy, and says all the right things again.  It works like a charm and people just keep voting.  They keep voting, never realizing that their vote GIVES THE GOVERNMENT LEGAL RIGHTS OVER THEM.  All legal rights over them.  Thatís why in Sovietized countries and now in many other countries including Australia, you have to vote by law so that the government can have authority over you.  If you donít vote, technically, legallyÖ in their own strange religion, in fact, it kind of upsets them when they have to pass laws over you and make you go along simply because the rest have gone along.  Itís not tidy enough.  Itís not quite tidy.  So they prefer you to vote to give them authority to do what they want with you. 


Under the definition of democracy the only right the citizen has is to vote.  THATíS IT.  You canít recall people.  You canít kick them out of office.  You canít say wait a minute, youíve gone in a completely different direction from your election.  It makes no difference.  Your only right is to vote.  Thatís what the Soviet system gave you, the choice of Politburo number 1, 2 or 3 to vote for.  They had the same kind of system in place. 


Confidence is very, very important.  Thatís why the new anchor men and women are on the air with about 10 different face lifts throughout the 50-60 years theyíre there, because youíve grown up with them.  They keep them there until theyíre falling off the chairs and shaking with Parkinsonís, because you got to have confidence in these characters.  Itís like mom or dad, youíve grown up listening to them and theyíre there every night at 6pm staring you right in the face.  You donít realize theyíre reading a dummy board.  It doesnít matter.  To YOU, the viewer, theyíre familiar to you.  You have confidence in themÖ and theyíd never lie to YOU, obviously.  Thatís why big news companies keep telling you that theyíre the Ďmost trusted media on television.í  The CBC, the Communist Broadcasting Corporation of Canada, which is owned by the government - itís a government station; our version of the BBC - they actually have ads on all the time telling you that Mr. Mansbridge and these guys are Ďthe most trusted newscaster in Canadaí.  Even saying that, apparently works.  It must sort of reinforce the con, I guess. 


Confidence.  This leads into the story here.  This is from Reuters, who ROUTES THE REALITY TO YOU.  Itís a safe story to read, obviously, since they printed it. 


Fed urges secrecy on banks in bailout programs

Thu Aug 27, 2009† /  By Jonathan Stempel


NEW YORK, Aug 27 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Reserve (Alan:  The Federal Reserve.  Thatís like the Bank of England or the Bank of Canada.) asked a federal judge not to enforce her order that it reveal the names of the banks that have participated in its emergency lending programs and the sums they received, saying such disclosure would threaten the companies and the economy.  (A:  So disclosing the companies that ripped everybody off and were doing all these con games and Ponzi schemesÖ it would threaten the companies and the economy.  What economy are they talking about?  The only economy thatís left is this new con game of carbon taxes and trading carbon.)


The central bank filed its request on Wednesday, two days after Chief Judge Loretta Preska of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan ruled in favor of Bloomberg News, which had sought information under the federal Freedom of Information Act.


Preska said the Fed failed to show that revealing the names would stigmatize the banks and result in "imminent competitive harm." The Fed asked the judge not to require disclosure while it readies an appeal.


"Immediate release of these documents will cause irreparable harm to these institutions and to the board's ability to effectively manage the current, and any future, financial crisis," the central bank argued.  (A:  What theyíre saying here is that Ďit would significantly harm themí and theyíd lose public confidence.  CONFIDENCE.  Theyíre confidence men.  CON men, you see.  Thatís what this story is all aboutÖ that.  About the public losing confidence.  Remember, to be ripped off by a con man, youíve got to have confidence in the con man.  Heís a great fellow.  Great fellow.  So hereís the perpetrators once again ripping off the world and then getting the government to put you down and your great, great, great, great, great grandchildren, 10 times removed from the future, to pay off this massive, not even a loan but massive GIFT to them by the tax payer, by the government.  Which tells you who the governmentís working for.  I hope people realize THATíS who the government works for.  They donít work for the public.  Why would you not fix something that was broken?  Why would you keep it broken? Öand reward the ones that rip you off?  Thatís tells you who they work for.  Itís rather simple isnít it?  A simple thing that should be taught in kindergarten.  Back with more after these messages.)


Hi folks.   This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, trying to show people out there how confidence works and how confidence men really run the entire financial system because it was ALWAYS a confidence trick.  Money in itself is a confidence trick.  Itís someoneís idea that they managed to persuade others to accept.  They who run the money always run the world.  Itís so simple.  Itís very, very simple isnít it?  I used to wonder why people who really make things, carpenters and so on, always lived at the bottom level.  While those who dealt WITH money and ledgers and writing about money, MADE ALL THE MONEY.  Something was wrong with this.  I thought MAKING THINGS, actually making things was more important to humanity.  It turns out itís not, really.  To be stinking rich in this world, youíve got to deal with money.  You deal with money.  Thatís you sole business is dealing with money.  Thatís how you get rich.  Thatís where all the cons are.  Even Rothschild said it himself.  He said those who figure out the con, basically, of money and all the different kinds of compound interest, etc and how they could never be paid off and all that kind of stuff.  He said theyíll never squeal because they would be working IN those institutions and profiting themselvesÖ well by it too.  So, itís a truth.  Thereís a truth there obviously. 


Going back to this article here from Reuters where hereís the Federal Reserve asking for secrecy on all the banks involved in the rip-offs and how much money theyíre getting and all the rest of it. 


Underlying this case and a similar one involving News Corp's (NWSA.O) Fox News Network LLC is a question of how much the public has a right to know (A:  A question about how much the public have a right to knowÖ ) about how the government is bailing out a financial system in a crisis.  (A:  So really, weíre discussed as though weíre peasants.  Thatís what they mean by the public.  Do the public have a right to know?  The publicís to pay off all this debt, supposedly; it can never happen by the way.  But the elite are talking about does the public have a right to know [laughs] where their moneyís going.)


The Clearing House Association LLC, which represents banks, in a separate filing supported the Fed's call for a delay. It said speculation that banks' liquidity is drying up could cause runs on deposits, and trading partners to demand collateral.


"Survival (A:  This is interesting.) can depend on the ephemeral nature of public confidence," (A:  You know what ephemeral means?  Itís like when artists stand in front of an awful painting and wave their hands about and look upwards and around them.  Itís like in the air, itís in space, you know, ethereal.  Thatís what itís saying here.  "Survival can depend on the ephemeral nature of public confidence," [laughs].  Confidence again.)  Clearing House general counsel Norman Nelson wrote. "Experience in the banking industry has shown that when customers and market participants hear negative rumors about a bank, negative consequences inevitably flow."  (A:  Well, this guyís a genius.  Heís a genius to figure that out eh?  Then it gives you a list of the various banks involved and so on.  Itís all the big ones as usual.)


Nothing will happen.  Theyíll get their way.  Theyíve always got their way.  When governments have to go to these same big boys and ask for loans, cap in handÖ they donít want to go down as the President or Prime Minister that bankrupted the country and theyíre kicked out immediately and hated.  They donít want that so they keep the con going and they get well rewarded too.  They also get ghost-written books for them that are ready to go a year before they even put pen to paper because someone else writes them.  Theyíre always guaranteed, like Bill Clinton, $40 million in advance.  Thereís a good pay-off for you.  Thatís not bad to start with is it?  You havenít even left the office, havenít even started your book and itís finished.  [laughs]  And youíre guaranteed $40 million right off the bat.  Thatís a good pay-off.  Thatís how it happens.  Itís all quite legal too, by the way.  Thereís no laws about it to stop it. 


As I said at the beginning of the show, the big names that came down through history as conspiracies and so on, and everybody pooh-poohed and laughed at by the mainstreamÖ are still at it.  Thereís the Rothschilds.  Iíve read the story a few months back where theyíre taking over most of the farming in India for GM foods and so on and utterly polluting the lands AFTER theyíd helped to crash the economy thereÖ get the farmers off the lands and bought them all out for peanuts.  The OLD Rothschild trick.  It happens every other century and they do it very well.  This is from The Sunday Times.  Remember, Nathan Mayer Rothschild is also the one who really is behind the big carbon trading funds.  It all goes through his bank.  I read an article a few months ago where he was advocating this; that it ALL goes through his PRIVATE bank in Switzerland, the family bank, the main one where all the familyís involved.  They get their big CUT of all these carbon tradings that governments and big corporations are making a lot of money on.  Here heís going after the roadways as well.  He wants to privatize all of Britainís roads and no doubt in other countries as well. 


NM Rothschild pitches motorway privatisation plan

Robert Watts and Dominic OíConnell  /  From The Sunday Times August 30, 2009


A radical plan to raise £100 billion by privatising the motorway network has been presented to the three main political parties by NM Rothschild, the influential investment bank.  (A:  Again, here... Did anyone vote him in?  I mean supposing your plumber that represented your plumberís association went forward with this. Weíd laugh wouldnít we?  Technically we should laugh at this guy because his specialty is supposedly is in just counting money, figuring out cons and doing multiple loans and so on with compound interest.  So here he is going to the government with a plan to raise all this money and heís going to do it of course, because he wants to help the public, Iím sure.  It doesnít say that here but heís altruistic, Iím sure.  £100 billion by privatising the motorway network presented to the three main political parties by NM Rothschild.)


Rothschild (A:  Hereís how itís worded in the Masonic Britain.), an architect of several privatisations (A:  Several?  Iíd say a few hundred.), made its pitch in the weeks running up to the summer recess on July 21, Whitehall sources said. Bankers told leading politicians that the sale of the roads overseen by the Highways Agency ó all motorways and most big trunk roads ó could help revive battered public finances. (A:  [laughs] Hereís the bankers whoíve ripped off the whole country going for the next thing that they want.  Itís just astonishing.)


Toll-road companies and infrastructure funds would compete to operate and maintain stretches of the network.


In one version of the scheme, the government would pay for upkeep through a system of ďshadowĒ tolls. (A:  Now, government doesnít make anything.  They take your tax money.  So how could government pay?  The taxpayer would pay for the upkeep. Thatís what private/public means.  through a system of ďshadowĒ tollsÖ shadow tollsÖ) A more radical, and less politically palatable, option would be for companies to charge motorists directly through toll booths or electronic card readers. The RAC (A:  Royal Automotive Club.) Foundation, a motoristsí group, advocated privatisation in a report last week.  (A:  Well, theyíre on the payroll of you know who.  The first word tells you, Royal.)


Life is a joke isnít it?  Life is really a big joke.  The most incredible cons are pulled off in front of your eyes.  You know darned well that the government will put this up for bidding, as you well know.  Every government contract says that the lowest or highest bidders will not necessarily be accepted because - they wonít tell you this - because theyíve already chosen who itís to go to.  Always.  ALWAYS.  Even in your local governments, thatís how it works.  Theyíll sell it off for peanuts.  Theyíve sold everything else that the tax payer funded and built up, for peanuts off in Britain and pretty well in the rest of the British Commonwealth countries as well.  Quite something eh?† Thatís a confidence trick. 


Itís so blatant.  You see, I used to wonder why they said knights were bold.  These knights, theyíre always getting knighted.  Why were they bold?  Why is there a K in front of the night, like K-Night?  But knights are bold.  Itís because theyíre audacious.  That means theyíll do the audacious thing, audacityÖ something youíd never think ofÖ in the heat of battle or whatever.  Thatís what they do.  Theyíre audacious and bold.  They pull things off while weíre standing with gaping mouths saying, no one would do that.  And they do it.  Itís that simple.  That simple. 


Confidence.  Confidence tricks.  Well, the United Nations is really the most evil thing, I think, that these characters have designed in all their long historiesÖ for takeover.  The United Nations is a Sovietized system that uses Marxian principles to bring about what they call equalityÖ even to the extent where theyíll do reverse discrimination and say there is - Iíve read the stories, this happened in Australia - where reverse discrimination is actually good.  They can TWIST your reality and your logic until youíre upside-down in all kinds of ways.  NOT to bring in equality to but to destroy ALL that was before and all culture that existed before. 


Culture, when it was cohesive, could stand up against the big boys.  So they create chaos and then they bring out a NEW order.  Thatís how it works.  Very, veryÖ again, itís simplistic.  Part of the United Nations, the World Health Organization, which I think really deals out more death than health because itís all to do with population control.  The World Health Organization, in their 2006 report, SAID - Iíve read the articles before - if they create enough panic and fear amongst the public to MAKE the them all go in a certain direction, they can get them to take the shots every year.  To MAKE the herd take their shots every year.  Panic and scary scenariosÖ. Remember those articles I read?  ĎGive them scary scenarios,í terrify them.  Thatís what this swine flu nonsense is all about.  Hereís from The Mail Online. 


The swine flu call centres where staff have nothing to do
but play cards and Trivial Pursuit

By Tom Kelly  /  29th August 2009


Two swine flu call centres are to close just weeks after opening because staff have been spending most of their time playing cards and board games.


Hundreds of thousands of pounds of taxpayers' money (A:  Thatís how much they put at this to be a big CON, you see.) has been 'squandered' after around 1,200 workers were employed to deal with the expected deluge of anxious calls.  (A:  Because they really were hyping up all this nonsense in the media.  They set up these call centers to deal with hysterical people.)


But staff said far fewer calls were made than predicted and supervisors allowed them to play cards and games such as Trivial Pursuit and Monopoly to help pass the long hours between calls.


One said that for most of the four weeks he was working at the NHS centre in Farnborough, Hampshire, each staff member took on average just two five-minute calls per eight-hour shift. (A:  10 minutes for you job for the day; thatís not bad eh?)


He said: 'The whole thing has been a fiasco. It seems to have been a complete knee-jerk reaction, set up with no real thought.  (A:  Iíll contradict that.  No.  This was set up with real thought alright because they must keep the con going.  Theyíre training the herd through scary scenarios to go and get your flu shots.  In 2006 World Health Organization said, if they can convince the public through mandatory stuff and threats and fear that youíve got to take the shots, then you can start giving them shots EVERY year, NOT just for flu but for constant boosters, every year of their life for the rest of their lives.  Thatís the agenda, folks.  Thatís from the World Health Organizationís own web site.  Iíve got all the stuff here.)


'I can understand the Government had to prepare for the worst, but this was just ludicrous.


'They could have put these two centres into one about a quarter of the size, and still had scores of spare lines in case things got really bad. (A:  Which they never did, of course.)  They've squandered a vast amount of public money needlessly.'


The National Pandemic Flu Service  -  which comprises phone lines and a website  -  was launched last month.  (A:  Now theyíre doing everything except knitting.  Nothingís happening, but that wonít stop the agenda.  That will NOT stop the agenda.  Iíve said it before, itís the same with the global warming fiasco.  When these guys make their plans and they get things rolling, they will never alter direction.  Even if they made them 50 years ago, they will never alter their direction.  Thatís why I urge you to read the books written by the big players from the early 1900s onwards.  They outline the whole century and beyond for you.)


Thatís your fiasco, the swine flu and theyíre going to go ahead with it.  Itís really just to get you used to taking all different kinds of shots and again, give you cancer viruses and various diseases like rheumatoid arthritis and stuff like that, chronic fatigue.  They donít want a healthy population now.  Theyíve been complaining through the Optimum Population Trust and many other foundations, thereís just too many people and they should be thinking about DEATH, not just medical healing, but actual DEATH; making you live shorter lives.  Thatís what they mean by it. 


The great United NationsÖ Youíve got to read the Huxleys, as I say, Julian Huxley, the first CEO of UNESCO at the United Nations.  This is from Fox News. 


U.N. Report Advocates Teaching Masturbation to 5-Year-Olds

Wednesday, August 26, 2009  /  By Joseph Abrams


NEW YORK ó  The United Nations is recommending that children as young as five receive mandatory sexual education that would teach even pre-kindergarteners about masturbation and topics like gender violence. 


The U.N.'s Economic, Social and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (A:  It was to make a standard culture for the worldÖ but NOT a nice, happy one.  Itís to be a Sovietized, planned one of indoctrination.) released a 98-page report in June offering a universal lesson plan for kids ranging in age from 5-18, an "informed approach to effective sex, relationships" and HIV education that they say is essential for "all young people."  (A:  Remember, going into Huxley, he said they have to destroy marriage by promoting pre-pubertal sex and making it basically an obsession.  Well, look at television today and turn on Much-Music and youíll see teeny-boppers, little children, dancing to it.)


The U.N. insists the program is "age appropriate," but critics say it's exposing kids to sex far too early, and offers up abstract ideas ó like "transphobia" ó they might not even understand.  (A:  No kidding.)


"At that age they should be learning about ... the proper name of certain parts of their bodies," said Michelle Turner, president of Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, "certainly not about masturbation."


Turner was disturbed by UNESCO's plans to explain to children as young as nine about the safety of legal abortions, and to advocate and "promote the right to and access to safe abortion" for everyone over the age of 15.


These are IDEOLOGY, political ideology thatís being taught here.  When it comes to abortions, itís nothing to do withÖ donít get involved in individual stories and emotions.  You wonít see the forest for the trees. Their plan is to bring in a stage where youíll have to get permission to have a child at all.  Not because youíre a good or bad parent, by the way, but if youíve got the right genes.  Itís eugenics.  You have to devalue human life.  That was something that Julian Huxley said, the first CEO of UNESCO.  Get them to devalue human life and it could be brought about by starting abortions and then euthanasia for the elderly and what they call Ďthe unfit,í people who have psychiatric problems or could have mental abnormalities.  Thatís already been done, by the way.  People are being aborted for that already.  Back with more after these messages.


This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, just finishing up with UNESCO and their latest plans.  I read something too, about 2 years ago where they wanted this kind of stuff to be taught IN THE CLASSROOMS, where they actually DO IT in the classrooms.  Thatís to create a sort of orgiastic society, the kind the Plato talked about in The Republic, to an extent, where all women would be Ďin commoní.  In other words, every woman would be a walking prostitute, basicallyÖ  without needing a reward for it.  Thatís pretty well happened today if you havenít noticed.  Do you think that happened by itself? 


Nothing happens by itself.  All morality is either made by the culture as a preserving influence, for survival.  When thatís all destroyed you get what you have today.  Thatís all you see on televisionÖ is just sex, sex, sex.  Of course they wonít bond with anyone.  Thatís the main reason for it; they wonít bond with a mate for life and they wonít have children.  Thatís what itís all about. 


Hereís another one here, to finish off how silly and stupid it all gets once the government gets into action.  Hairdressers.  This is from The Evening Star.


Hairdressers in terror alert

ROSS BENTLEY  /  8/25/2009


ANTI-terror police are quizzing hundreds of hairdressers in Suffolk to see if they are storing peroxide which the authorities fear could be used to make a terrorist bomb.


The inquiry which involves checking every salon in the county is to find out how much of the chemical - which is used in hair bleaching - is being stored and if it is being kept in a safe place.


Barbers and stylists are being asked where they get their supplies from, how much they use, where it is kept and if their premises have CCTV or are fitted with a burglar alarm.


The hairdressers are also being urged to report any theft of peroxide to police immediately.


But busy Sudbury barber Lee Haynes said: "I thought it was a wind-up when I got a phone call and they said they were involved in a police anti-terrorism check.


ďThey wanted to know how much peroxide I had got on the premises and whether it was kept under lock and key.


ďWe hardly use the stuff here but I was told that unless I gave full details they would send an officer round to check."


The chemical is part of the colouring or bleaching process but most women's salons - where it is most commonly used - would probably get through less than a litre a week


A spokesman for Suffolk police defended the survey being carried out under the guidance of the force's counter-terrorism unit. 


Why donít they do the same for these guys as they do with the ones that were working on the flu information centers where theyíre playing Monopoly and cards?  Why donít they just give them board games to play?  Because they canít find terrorism.  They got to go creating it or looking for it.  Everything is such a FARCE today.  Utter farce.  Very expensive farces but thatís okay because youíll all pay for it, you see.  Incredible isnít it?  You create a police state across the whole planet, and when nothingís happening theyíre going through salons and barber shops to count liters of peroxide for bleaching hair.  They could pick anything, you know.  Anything at allÖ in your kitchen and do the same thing with your homes.  That will be next.  That will be next too.  Or even see if youíve got matches.  Maybe, eventually, youíll have to get a license to have matches.  Wouldnít that be something?  Why not?  Öin the world of make believe that we all live in here, anythingís possible when theyíre on a roll.  After all, weíve swallowed enough in the past, havenít we?  Whole sewagesÖ seas of sewage weíve swallowed.  Well, no wonder theyíre laughing at us at the very top.  Theyíre laughing and laughing and laughing at us.


From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada - where I do need your donations to come in - itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.




Topics of show covered in following links:


"Fed urges secrecy on banks in bailout programs" ( - Aug. 27, 2009.

"NM Rothschild pitches motorway privatisation plan" by Robert Watts and Dominic O'Connell, The Times - Aug. 30, 2009.

"The swine flu call centres where staff have nothing to do but play cards and Trivial Pursuit" by Tom Kelly ( - Aug. 29, 2009.

"U.N. Report Advocates Teaching Masturbation to 5-Year-Olds" by Joseph Abrams ( - Aug. 26, 2009.

"Hairdressers in terror alert" by Ross Bentley, Evening Star - Aug. 25, 2009.
(Article at original link was removed. Link is to excerpt in transcript text.)




Transcribed by Diana.