July 6th, 2009 (#357)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt July 6th, 2009:
Masters 'Correct' the Percept:
"Take a Little Time of Introspection,
Find Who's Playing with Your Perception,
Events Unforeseen Simply Unfold,
Experts Act on the Spot, so We're Told,
Yet Declassified Info Seems So Damning,
With Powerful Think-Tanks in Future Planning,
They've Political Agendas, Though Unelected,
Massive Financing, Well Protected,
Distorting Reality with Well-Crafted Word,
Mixing Truth with Deception, Perception is Blurred"
© Alan Watt July 6th, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - July 6th, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on July the 6th, 2009. Newcomers look into cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, and on the front page you will see lots of talks I've given, actually lots of sites I should say, where I put all my talks up. They're all the same basically, except for one. And you should bookmark these sites, because eventually, and I've already had some trouble in the past with some mainstream servers, eventually you'll find some of the mainstream are going to give us a hassle in probably the near future. Therefore, it's a good idea to have the other sites bookmarked, and these other sites you'll see, as I say at the front page of cuttingthroughthematrix.com are cuttingthrough.jenkness.com, very dependable site, cuttingthroughthematrix.net, .us, .ca, there's alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca as well, and finally there's also alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, which is the European site, which has all the audios of the talks I've given, on the radio, in the last few years. And it also has some transcripts of these talks, which you can download for print-up, written in the various languages of Europe. As always, I start the show, and it's probably a bad idea to always say at the beginning, because people just skip over it. You bring me to you. You the listener bring me to you, because I don't ask for money from any of the stations I'm on. I don't get paid by the advertisers; the advertisements on this show are paid directly to the radio station. I've nothing to do with that. And they pay for the time, the technicians, and their bills, and all the rest of it. So it's up to you to keep me going. If you are getting something out of how I'm tying things together for you, by donating to me or purchasing that which I have for sale on my websites, that makes me tick over, and I mean, tick over. So, it's up to you to keep me going. Those who just get discs burned and passed around to them, because they don't like computers, there's lots of people out there like that. I don't blame them at all. You can always write to me [listed above].
And I was going to talk about the weather of all things, and why not, you know. It used to be a boring thing at one time as a polite conversational piece, to talk about the weather, because everyone watched the same weather forecast. That's the only reason you tuned into television at one time, to see what the next day might be. They were never very accurate. But today of course, it's very predictable, and really since about the last ten years, big climatic changes have indeed happened, but it hasn't been caused by natural events. It's not caused by populations either, it's caused by incredible aircraft in the skies that have been geo-engineering the planet since about '98 on a fairly regular basis. And the weather now is predictable, because last summer, all June and July, every single day, seven days a week, they would spray in the morning, it would rain for the rest of the day, clear up for an hour at 7pm and then overcast again by 8pm, and then it would start raining all night again, constantly. And this year is a pretty well repeat of last year. An absolute repeat, it's clockwork. So the weather now is predictable. We hardly ever see the sun, up where I am. This weekend was the first weekend I've seen it for the whole summer. The snow when it melted around April/May just sunk into the ground and couldn't even evaporate. Just puddles everywhere, right up to the present, because it's rained since then on. I'll be back with more, after these messages.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through the Matrix, and I opened up tonight about the weather, and how where I live, which is at the top of a particular jet stream, which really loops at the bottom around the Michigan area, you'll find that when you go into the writings of Teller and others who worked for the Pentagon, and the U.S. government, Teller remember was the inventor of the H-bomb, but he also came up with the idea of altering the atmosphere for different military purposes, a long, long time ago. And his papers are up there, at least the ones they've declassified, are up there for the public to view. He talked about using metallic particles, primarily, seeded in the atmosphere which would create a more electrified circuit for pulsations of ELF waves from standing wave technology. He said you could cover whole continents with this type of technology, because the metallic particles are more conducive to electrical signals, almost like antenna, if you like. He also mentioned too, they could either heat the planet by different kinds of particles, or cool it by using another type of particles. I've mentioned so many times that we, at the bottom level, the general population, are never ever, ever in on any real truth on anything. When we get a bit of a truth, it's always covered by some other excuse or reason or something like that. There's always deception involved. So we try to figure things out for ourselves at the bottom, and all we have at the bottom is our own perception of events and things, and our own memories, we have our memories, and only by using memory, and accepting, and this is the key to everything, accepting your own personal perceptions of that which is around you, can you come to any logical conclusions.
The war primarily, remember, has been going on for an awful long time, is always a war on the mind. And how you control masses of people, simultaneously, apart from giving them the same education, the same mass of newscasts information, etc, how you control them is by getting them to ignore their own perceptions. And succumbing, bowing the knee in other words, bowing the knee, and succumbing to what you think are those who are more qualified to arrive at conclusions than you are yourself. I was just talking today about how people today, most folk out on the street will think about global warming if you ask them, they'll tell you, well, I guess it's true. It's all over the media, it has been, it doesn't matter what media you look at, or even nature programs, it's going to be in there somewhere. And there's so much coming out from mainstream media from politicians who are on board with this. Now politicians, remember, they have a different kind of job. They're not scientists. Number one, they're not scientists. They're really middle men in a sense, along with the media. They are responsible for fooling the general population by giving you disinformation in a very plausible manner, with a straight face and confidence. Confidence is the key to it. So much so, that the general population will always, well they must be right. They can't all be lying to us, all these guys with the suits and ties on. And I've mentioned today that the suits and ties, really are the new priesthood of the modern society. No one's every explained to me why if you're told to go to court, or a wedding, there's only one official outfit you can wear, and it's a suit, and a shirt, with a tie on it. A tie is the most incredulously stupid thing every invented. It has no purpose, unless you have an assailant that wants to strangle you easier. Or if you want to heat yourself to death on a really hot day, if you're lucky enough to have one.
We find that we ignore our own perceptions. And the more scientists that they bring forward on board with an agenda, the more believable it becomes. The difference between a small time crook, who's a purse snatcher, and a very, very good confidence trickster, is that the purse snatcher comes up behind you and instantly grabs something and runs off with it. And he generally is wearing the hood, and all the rest of it, so he's recognizable to an extent, and understandable to an extent by the general public. However, a confidence trickster is a guy who meets you at an airport, and you walk out with your briefcase or your suitcase, and he says "Excuse me", and he's dressed very well, he doesn't evade your eyes, he's very pleasant looking, he's not hostile looking, and he'll say in a very confident manner, "Excuse me sir, that's mine. You picked up mine by mistake." And then he'll point, "you see that little scratch, that's how I recognize this is mine. I picked up your one by mistake. And it's in with the security staff, you just need to go in and ask for it; can I take this off your hands now, and get on my way?" And most folk will doubt themselves. They'll doubt themselves because of the gall, the brass as they say, of a confidence trickster, and give it away. That's how confidence tricksters work. They get you to doubt your own logic, perceptions, and definitely your ability for self-preservation. That's the job of trained politicians. That's also why they recruit into politics so many psychopaths. Because psychopaths have that natural ability. They understand this instinctively, intuitively, how to manipulate other people with boldness. And they don't blink when they tell a lie. And they're very pleasant and confident when they approach you. That's how it works. The same people who are fooled, and grab on to the climate change stuff, and we've all got to sacrifice, and we've got to give all our rights over to this new priesthood, the scientific dictatorship, you see, because they're going to try and save us. It's the same Con Game as the Communism used, when they took over Russia, or say Vietnam.
I was told recently about a person in Vietnam, when the Communists came through to a man's store in the country. He also owned two buses that ran rural areas. He was told that everything in that store, including the store, now belonged to the people, but he'd be allowed maybe to work the store, on behalf of the people, but he personally now owned nothing. The people owned it all. His buses were now owned by the people. Now the people couldn't just walk in there and take what they wanted, because you have these self-appointed representatives of the people, who used the people as a front for everything. You see. Now that's easy to understand how that system works, and how this simple psychology of the distortion of perception by using terminology. Yet we get so confused when politicians, you know the respectable ones, you know, the ones we think are legitimate and legal, that's the key to it as well, tell us the most outrageous things, and demand more and more tax money, and now they're wanting service from the people, for the good of the people. They are now the official representatives of the people. If any of these politicians put on a little wider hat, and a black suit, and a white tie, and walked into your store, and said to you as the store owner, "I want protection money." And if you said to them, or asked them the question, "Protection from what?" He'd say, "Protection from us. Otherwise, we'll burn your place down and take it from you, or kill you." You call that extortion. You see. But you get the politician on a television set, saying we're upping the taxes for this reason, or that reason, or that reason, the people obey immediately. Tax, remember, means labor. You tax yourself. Labor. The definition of slavery is when someone demands your free labor. It doesn't matter how they get it back, but money is simply a representation of the energy output that you put out for yourself, and it's then taken from you. And when they're on television, saying we're wanting taxes, what happens, if you can't pay them, you're kicked out of your home. It's the same thing. There's no difference whatsoever. Because all you have to worry about as a store owner is the mafia. And all you have to worry about as the store owner or the house owner, in a democratic society, all you have to worry about is your government, because if anything happens, they're going to kick you out of that house if you can't pay. Same thing. Perceptions. All to do with how you perceive things. And you can train people to perceive things in a distorted fashion. Those same people who are fooled, millions of people who are fooled by the global warming and all the scientists that all belong to the same associations, who all get paid by grants, and who will have no money if there's no global warming, are simply a priesthood. Those same people who will believe them, if you mention Catholicism, or Christianity, will all laugh in your face, and say that Con was used in the Middle Ages, right up into the early 20th century, when priests had to convince you to believe what they told you to believe. And the only way that you could be saved from anything was through that same priesthood. They can't see the same con is being used today. The exact same con is used today, under the guise that this is science. Just changed the terminology. The expert on religion is the guy with the black outfit on. He'd been verified officially to be a priest by the Vatican, the top honcho, in times gone by. He had to be legitimate. He knew things you'd never know. He had been closer to God in heaven then you had ever dreamed of, but he would tell you what you had to believe. He would get you to doubt your own sanity, your own rationale, your own experience in life. And then he'd tell you once you were completely broken and scared and shaking, how he could save you, and the same thing's happening today. Why change the technique, if it's worked before. Back with more after these messages.
This is Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through the Matrix. Just explaining briefly, something that isn't really that complex. There's certainly numerous people using it, all working together, that's the key to the things in the high systems above us. They have a saying that a hundred men working, and walking, and marching together, meaning on the same path, on the same road towards the same ends, are far more effective then ten thousand all doing their own thing, and walking at their on pace. That's called consensus you see. They're all in consensus with the future. And they plan and build the future, always, always. Long term planning. And when we get told as I say about things, like geo-engineering, they've already been doing it, and perhaps not even for the reasons they tell. Probably not for the reasons they tell us. As I say, Teller also talked about the military purposes of seeding the atmosphere, with metallic particles and how with a standing wave technology that would cover whole continents, and perhaps the world, they could alter the behavior of people as well. It was not a guess by a scientist, it was through empirical study and testing obviously on people. Otherwise the Pentagon wouldn't have gone ahead and been interested in written up screeds of reports on it. Everything is tried out. And we're seeing all of this culminate today, as we go through the massive changes to a new society, that's only part of an agenda towards a much, much bigger agenda. Everything is a stage on the way. If you jumped too quickly, for instance. If you wanted to ban automobiles all together, because, in all societies which become totalitarian, or even start off in a totalitarian manner, you always restrict travel, number one. You do that in wartime too. So they've used wartime scenarios for many things today. But if you were out of the blue, came out of say 1970 and said, "We're banning cars tomorrow," there'd have been riots everywhere, mayhem. So what you do is you give people twenty years, thirty years of propaganda, expert opinion, again all on board. And they'll never tell you these guys all belong to the same clubs, associations, etc, or where they get their paychecks from. Twenty or thirty years will do the trick. And you also teach it in school, implant early all the negative aspects of it, and then down the road, you can start to phase them out, and people will think, well I guess they had to do it because those things are so bad obviously, they keep telling us that. That's called Fabianism. Incremental approaches to altering society and their behavior. Remember the Soviet Man, that the Communists talked about. They believed that man being an animal, could be trained to do and believe anything, and Lenin himself said it, there are a thousand directions and ways, paths, that society could go, but the public mustn't be allowed to think that way. They must think that the one they're born into is the only natural one there is, simply because it exists when they're born.
It's like money, money itself is simply the first big con game, first big con game. And it was never intended to last forever as it was, it's changed many times, we know that different civilizations had different things for exchange, from sea shells to porcupine quills, to the standardization process. And that's what money, coined money brought in, was standardization. As standardization goes on, it means there's a more powerful small elite getting more powerful all the time, in charge of that you see. All competition is banned. Then once you have established yourself, and you've got established intergenerational families, you can then control the next phase that's electronic blips on a screen. And then you go into the next phase of it, a new society where you don't work for yourself anymore, technically we don't do it now anyway, everyone who pays taxes works for government; that's what a federal employee told me. Everybody works for government. The store keepers work for government. Anyone who employees anyone works for government, because they are given the job of taking the taxes and working out the paychecks, and sending the cash on. And that's how it works in most countries. The average person in Europe doesn't have to really bother about income taxes, because their employer is responsible for taking it off your paychecks and sending it in, automatically.
You're born into a system where your parents did the same thing. They never questioned it, so you do think to question it either. But as I say, the distortion or alteration of a word, just that little alteration, alters your perception of it from extortion to taxes, and even tax means labor, and the definition of slavery is where your labor is taken from you by force, or threat of force. The new society is to be a world that serves the world state, and just like the Communists who spoke on behalf of "the people." The official ones who represented "the people" and told "the people" what to do. We have our new knights, you might call them, or barons of the world enterprise, who have already decided, and probably decided an awful long time ago, an awful long time ago, that when they de-industrialized the West, which they did know, and some of them signed agreements to de-industrialize, like Britain at the end of WW2, they didn't tell the public until the European Union was finalized and set up. But they knew they'd have to bring in a new type of economy.
Now what is economy? If you really look back at any country, you're looking at a business. Countries, each country is a business, with, as Huxley said, a dominant minority at the top. It's a business, everybody works for government, remember that. And businesses always have their long-term business plans. I'll be back with more on this after these messages.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through the Matrix. I'm trying to get people to actually think about things, and how we take so much for granted, simply because we've heard certain terms, and seeing the same things since we were small, such as politicians coming on television, at budget times especially, saying why they have to, for the common good, for you see, the good of the people, remember, they represent the people, for the common good they have to put a tax on this, that or the other, etc. There's no real difference in the techniques, as I say, that the Communists used, where the officials said that "We speak on behalf of the people, for the common good." It's all the same trick that's used. And because we are social creatures, and we have all come from tribes at one point or another in the past, we go along with this kind of conology as I call it, instinctively. And those at the top, who run the world, and who have thousands of think tanks working on all aspects of society, and all possible foreseeable problems with society, as they go through what they planned for the next hundred, two hundred years or whatever, know this stuff instinctively. They're taught the arts of mass psychology, and how people perceive, mainly as a collective society, and how people think collectively, and how people socialize collectively. Part of being collective in a sense, and what we call social, as we pass through our day, is bouncing off ideas that you've been told from the media, to other people, and they come back with the same opinions as you've been given. You think, well we're all thinking this, so it must be true, therefore I am sane. And you also like to be accepted by your own, by your peer group. So you don't want to be different. This stuff is taught at the top, through classes, and they also use philosophers.
I used to wonder why Arnold Toynbee was always pulled in to the big international social meetings on behalf of the World Socialists or Worker's Society, and then the other one was the Fabian Society. And then why, again, historians like Professor Carroll Quigley were pulled in by the Council on Foreign Relations, the State Department, and so on. It's because they use history and how societies have been managed in the past. Because management runs on formula, and any formula, as Plato said basically, that had worked on people in the past, could be brought back again, and people will behave exactly the same way. Anything that the public have been made to do in past ages – regardless of cultures, or where they happen to have been born, or lived, or whatever – can be reintroduced again. This is known and understood. And there are definitely archives of this kind of information available to people who are chosen to have access to them. People who are well tried and tested for their ability to keep their mouth shut basically, and to go along with things, and allow themselves to be well rewarded in the process. I mentioned years ago that a professor had told me that there are archives, real archives of real history, probably similar to the ones that Professor Carroll Quigley talked about since he was brought into the Council on Foreign Relations Headquarters to be the official historian. He was given access to all the blank spots in history, all the whys, and who benefited and what was the real agenda for this or that or whatever. He was given access to that. These are archives of information. A professor told me something similar, he says, "maybe one out of 80 professors, will be pulled aside one day and given access to a certain archive or archives."
Information, remember, knowledge is power. And what's more powerful then the ability to teach people how to rule millions of people, maybe even billions. Tremendous powers, tremendous sciences. Bernays was not the only guy who understood mass psychology, and is given the credit in psychological associations ands schools and universities, given the credit for creating the American consumer culture. It was more then just consumerism. He was going along an agenda. He was the nephew of Freud, remember. Freud didn't come up with this stuff. Bernays joked about how he learned it. He says, "Well I just picked apart some of my uncle's books on psychology. That's nonsense, because Freud didn't go that deep into any of these subjects, at all. When you go into the 1800s, you'll find articles written about crowd control, crowds, how the crowd worked, how their mentality worked; today they just call it the herd, officially. It's called the herd. These sciences are taught, proven sciences are taught to selected people, who front for those in the dominant minority, in order to rule the people. And they use all of the techniques, but especially terminology. Terminology is so simple really, isn't it. It's a natural thing. We communicate by the use of words. And those who command the language, command the world. Orwell pretty well went into that to an extent with the use of the distortion of words, the alteration of words, and how complete perceptions were altered totally.
Your perspective on something is completely altered by the use of different words. As I say, suddenly extortion doesn't become extortion, it becomes taxation forced upon you, by force if need be. You will still lose your home, as the mafia would take your home or your store from you. Same thing, but the only difference is, there's a representative doing it on behalf of the people, for the good of all. I was thinking about all those folk who are losing their homes, right now. Something at the top they foresaw. They knew what was going to happen a long time ago. They allowed these sham, second and third, fourth, fifth-party mortgage companies to come in. They were given licenses to operate. And then the plug was pulled at the right time. Had to happen that way. And everyone can sympathize with them. The poor souls are losing their homes. And then they'll say, well, it's the economy, that's why they're losing their homes. No one stops to say, well, why are they losing their homes at all? Even the ones that have paid them up. There's a lot losing because they can't pay the taxes anymore, they've lost their jobs, but their homes are paid off. It's not the economy, it's the system. Because if you can't have a hut somewhere, or a shed, that you can call your own, regardless of financial collapse, economic or food depression, or whatever it happens to be, plague or anything else, then you have no home at all. If someone can lean on you, and that's what the mafia called it too, go lean on so-and-so, they haven't paid up yet. If anyone can lean on you, then you don't own it. So you've been conned into thinking that you own it. It's doublethink. You either own something or you don't. If you own something, no one can steal it from you. Very simple. It's all how you look at something, you see, and how we're trained to look at things, only through fairly recent custom.
It's the same with everything else out there, as I say, we're never told the real truth of anything at the bottom. We're told things as they become apparent to the public, like wars. Yeah, we've started a war here, we're invading there, but you'll never know the real long-term geopolitical goals or strategy, and the fact that this is part of a singular process to get from here to there to there to there to there.
Another instance of this I should bring up. I was thinking today about the NATO think tank, the Department of Defence that I've got on my archives section, the link for a 90-page report on the future, what they see for the future. Now they have the same characters who are at the top of the Council on Foreign Relations think tanks, working on this other think tank too. The Royal Institute for International Affairs, it's all the same people who work in all these top think tanks. Some of them can belong to the ten think tanks; they're the specialists you see. They go through the next thirty to fifty years with riots apparently going to break out spontaneously across the Western World, and that was before the financial collapse. Or all this hype, coming from the CFR about the coming food crisis. We've got unemployment, financial collapse, food crisis; what do these guys know in the think tanks that we didn't know, and how did they know? They know because it's part of a plan, you see. Their job is to find out how the public will react, and guess at all the kinds of reactions that different factions within the public will do at that time. And find ways to set up institutions to prevent them. It's like looking at a chess board with all the pieces and saying, before you even pick up the first piece, where do I want to go here? What will my opponent do? How many opponents do I have? How do I counteract the possible reaction to this part of my move? This is all done before anything is revealed to the public or any action has been taken at all to start the process of the dialectic. That's what think tanks do.
So here's a department of defence projecting these riots, so severe they say that they'll even have to use battlefield neutron bombs on crowds. And all kinds of "non-lethal" (which is a joke) weaponry, because all these non-lethal stuff can be turned out to be very lethal. And we have to keep in mind, they even say this amazing thing. That eventually there will be a world government coming out of this, but that won't be for long, it won't be forever. See most people think there's always an end goal to something at the top, from the bottom perspective, that's how we see things, because that's how we plan things. Well, I'll do this, this, and this, and maybe the time I retire, I'll have this little house over there, and a dog, and nice neighbors, and that's the end of it. Now you're just waiting to die. That's it. These people at the top plan the future intergenerationally. They know they won't be around, like John Maynard Keynes said, Bretton Woods Part II will come along in about 50 years, he says, but we won't see it, I won't see it, he says, but it will come. The next part of the financial plan in the agenda. That's how it works. That's what foundations do, they work intergenerationally, hiring, training, and retiring, and hiring, training, and retiring, so they can start off with a particular direction, a mandate, like a motto, "We will So and So, by the year, So and So," and they can do it. They have unlimited financing. Why would a World Government not last that long? Well the object is legalism. We are the only species, again, when we hear something is legal and legitimate we obey. To accomplish all the goals, leading up to a Brave New World, a much reduced population, where all the so-called useless eaters are gone, where all the so-called junk gene types are gone, you have to convince the public, we're the only species you have to convince to go along with our own extinction. Well, they have to sterilize us you see, because there's going to be too many of us in a few years, and that will cause the food shortages, and blah, blah, blah, blah. And we go along with it, or to save the planet, you know. The children now, there's even been articles in the newspapers where young women have come along out of school saying they don't mind being sterilized to save the world, the fewer children the better. We're the only species that needs to be conned. Animals don't do that. A dog, many dogs will snap at you if you try to remove their dinner from them while they're eating it. You can try to persuade them as much as you want, it's for the good of all, it won't make any difference to that dog. He knows you're taking away his food. So, a world government would only last until it had fulfilled its role, by redistributing the wealth, which really means starving different countries selectively, redistributing the food, remember the U.N. supposedly, ultimately is supposed to distribute quotas of food to every region or bloc, and that's the new name for all the groups we're hyped into. Of course, with the depopulation agenda, they'll say one day, we can't give the same quota, therefore it's been a bad harvest worldwide, and you've got to reduce your population. It's up to you how you do it. And then our own psychopathic politicians will come in the act, and start convincing us, why that must be so, and people are going to suffer for the collective good, there' s got to be sacrifice. As they get driven around in their big limos, and eat these incredible meals at all their functions, it's for the common good. You see.
Perceptions are always distorted for a long-term agenda, a long-term plan. And once of course, maybe it will take a hundred years, who knows, maybe less. The World Government's been here, they'll have reduced the population, they'll have mandated selective breeding, authorized breeding only. Permits, etc. Once they've got their manageable population, you can go into the next part of the Department of Defence's Projection, because after that will come what they call, maybe half a dozen, super cities, across the world. There will be no more countries. They won't need a United Nations to con the people, as though they were some sort of philanthropic organization handing candy out to disenfranchised people in Africa. Because that was never their function. They won't need the United Nations, and they won't need countries. Countries have been used up until now for war, which goes to the creation of Empires. The bigger empires, once you have a world empire, now it's a matter of, and you've had the whole society working for generations on Science, Technology, which they all grab at the top and use.
They've decided they no longer need all the people. A fixed system will suit them fine from then on. And once all the junk genes are gone, they can live in these big, big dome cities, very high-tech they say. Very high-tech. And I guess the barbarians are left, the few remaining barbarians around there in what used to be countries will just die off over time, but they'll be of no threat to these super high-tech, highly weaponized dome cities. They even say that there might even be warfare, once in a while between these dome cities. So it's a Never Ending Story, this odd thing which They call Progress. Progress. We say it, we repeat it, Progress. Well, what is Progress? Someone decides the way to go obviously, for it to be acclaimed at the top as going somewhere forward. Forward to what? It's like "Change is Good." What kind of change are you talking about here? I mean I like to know these things before I embark upon their enterprises. I'll be back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through the Matrix. I didn't mean to go on tonight, I had a few articles that I was going to read, but these ideas hit me before shows. I don't prepare shows. And I think it's important that people realize some of the very well established sciences that are used upon them all the time. Just one article here before I go off, to show you how something's done, by the Fabian technique of gradualism. If the public won't do something, and you wanted to chip them all in the 1970s, how do you make them accept a chip? How do you make them accept a chip? Well, we see how it's been done. It's going to be the answer to everything. It's going to act like a drug to make you feel happy, by really buzzing out your endorphins, stuff like that. It's been in all the science papers over years. You give them addictions to electronics, you see, that it's all fun, fun, fun, and it's so convenient. You're getting trained through cards to be used for money. Then you go on to a chip. And say, yep, thirty years down the road, we could actually make them want the chip, and if you couple it with social behavior, generally to do with sexual behavior, because everyone goes through the hormonal rages, then you've got a winner. Here's an article from Voltairenet.org, it says:
RFID Implants for Humans Hyped On Yahoo Tech
(Alan: Yahoo's been pushing this stuff for a long time. It says:)
It works for Fido, so why not you?
The same RFID implants used to identify lost pets
(A: You see, that's how they got us used to the idea, the familiarization process.)
are now being adapted for use on you and me, and not how one might have originally expected. As with all pioneering technologies, it’s leisure pursuits that are getting the first stab at the tech.
(A: And this is from an article that I read before, a long time ago, but it's an update on the Baja nightclub. It says: )
One beach-oriented Barcelona nightclub, the Baja Beach Club, is using the implants to free customers of the burdens of having to carry their purses or wallets. Makes sense: When you’re spending the day in a bikini and flip-flops, where do you keep your ID? Instead, the bouncer just scans your arm with an RFID reader, and you’re in.
They've been using this now for the last two or three years there. And here's the interesting part, that's not mentioned here I think. The man who spearheads this organization, the Barcelona Nightclub, the Baja Beach Club, and so on, this chain, in a previous article which I read maybe a year ago, just happens to be an ex-NSA man at the top. National Security Agency. What a happy profession for him to choose when he picks early retirement. How fortunate for him that it's in the same line that he happened to work in. How do you get people to voluntarily take a chip, you see. You make the public want it. That's what you do. Getting back to the Soviet man. They said man's an animal and you can train him to believe, or do, or behave in any way you wish. If you know the formula, and how to present it to them. Incrementally. You can make him do anything at all. And they even have vans going around where a nurse will inject this into your skin. They've been doing this as I say for a few years now. Of course these clubs have the most gorgeous young females there to attract the guys in, dancers and all that. Guaranteed, you can't fail, it can't fail. And of course they'll also have platinum, gold, silver, bronze, and so on accounts, which is scanned into your little RFID chip to give it snob appeal. Snob Appeal. Everyone will want it, that's how it's done. Make them want it. Cull off the rest of the people, but please don't, don't cull off me. It's for the common good. That's how we're managed. Very simply. That's it for tonight, from Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, where it's raining again, so Good Night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
Article: "RFID Implants for Humans Hyped On Yahoo Tech" (voltairenet.org) - July 1, 2009.
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:
Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)
"Reality Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"