June 22, 2009 (# 347)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt June 22, 2009:
Slavery is Freedom, Tyranny is Safety:
"The Global Tyranny is Well Underway,
Our Masters with Cameras Own All They Survey,
And We the People are Part of the Property,
Sustainable Resources, Not as it Ought-ter-be,
Where are the Minds of Contented Slaves?
Worshiping Their Idols, All Glamour and Rave,
Fiction Leads to Reality, Method Incremental,
Not a Jot in Your Programming is Incidental,
Science Fiction Movies Bring Reality Near,
No Need for Fiction When Horror is Here"
© Alan Watt June 22, 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - June 22, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 22nd of June, 2009. For newcomers, look in to cuttingthroughthematrix.com web site and on the front page youíll see all the other sites I have. You should really pick one to be your favorite and use it for downloading the shows. That way it spreads bandwidth. It gives servers less chance to hassle me for all the downloads that come from the their particular server. It spreads it. Also, Iím sure in the very near future there will be more trouble coming down the pike from some of the mainstream servers. Therefore, one day you wonít see it on cuttingthroughthematrix.com . It will be gone. But if you have the other sites noted, you can keep downloading from them. Also, the European site alanwattsentientsentinel.eu which has all the audios and it has transcripts, of quite a lot of them, written in the various languages of Europe. So thatís what you have to choose from in the meantime.
Thereís so many articles coming out now about mainstream servers being jockeyed along by governments. They comply. We also have psy-ops as well and the Cyber cops, as well, on top of us. So things are gradually coming down. People have had their sites pulled already in different countries across the planet. Itís happening quietly, at the moment.
Those who listen to my show, help to keep me going if they donate. If they donít, one day youíll turn it on and I wonít be there. Itís as simple as that. Thatís how it works because Iím brought to you by YOU, the listener. I donít ask for money from the advertisers. What you hear on the show goes straight to RBN. That pays for time for the show. It pays for the technicians and all their equipment and all the rest of it. So, itís up to you to keep it going. I try to stay out of the usual mainstream, what they call Patriot Movement because, to be honest with you, I only came in to this whole thing a long time ago because I saw where it was going. It was going in circles and they didnít see the big picture. Therefore, I came out and I think I helped. I did help to shape the direction itís gone in since then across the board. You can go in to any of the sites and youíll find out how to donate through PayPal, personal check is fine in Canada and the US. Western Union abroad. Thereís even MoneyGrams being used. So, thatís fine with me. Those who get the CDs passed around because theyíre burned and they donít have a computer, you can also get in touch with me by writing [listed above].
You can also buy that which I have for sale on the web site as well. Youíll find out quite easily if you go in to the site. Thereís an enormous archive of shows Iíve done where I cover a broad range of histories trying to show the people that TRULY weíre kept like mushroomsÖ weíre kept in the dark and fed you know whatÖ and itís bovine fecal matter. Thatís the job of the media that takes over from your education. By media, itís ALL media including fictional works as well. In fact, some of the most important predictive programming you get is through fiction and dramas and soaps. I think Jacques Ellul was the expert on that when he talked about propaganda and how ALL hospital and cop shows are ALL propaganda. Back with more after these messages.
Hi folks, this is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix. The way weíre treated truly is like youíd treat children, very, very young children when they ask questions that you think they arenít prepared to receive an answer for. That is how government treats us with its various policies. Weíre kept as though weíre children. You canít tell the children the bad news, especially if you have intentions which are going to upset them. Therefore, just like pedophiles, they LIE to you. They lie to you with nice, smiling faces and thereís nothing, thereís no lie big enough that they wonít tell. Itís that easy. Itís truly that easy. Many books have been written about authoritarianism and how people succumb to it and why and how theyíre manipulated. It also takes a sort of symbiosis between the victim and the perpetrator when it comes to MASS indoctrination, MASS manipulation and getting the public to go along with the various agendas to change the whole of society, which has been changed many times in the past, especially culture-wise. THATíS an old trick.
Since about the 1950s onwards, the cultures of the Western hemisphere were under absolute attack. Not from outside influences because we see that they were already global. There was already a global authority in the 50s. It was set up at the end of World War II under the United Nations. Every county that signed on, signed AWAY its ability to be independent. You should check it up for yourself. Look in to the San Francisco meeting. See what they signed away. However, they also knew that it would be very difficult to bring in their long-awaited global governance. Something that the Royal Institute for International Affairs was set up to do in the first place, and the Council on Foreign Relations, which is the same thing, only the American branch. That was always their goal, to set up a world government. But in order to do so, especially to do it the way that Karl Marx wanted it done, which was first a United Europe followed by a United Americas and then a conglomerate of the Pacific Rim region, then they knew theyíd have to literally try and alter the cultures to bring them together, to blend them together into this new culture. Not a melting pot of the old, but really bringing it in to a new culture with each bloc which eventually could be brought in to the MAIN WORLD bloc without any problem.
Again, thatís what the Reece Commission found when they had the Congressional investigation into the big foundations. The book, Foundations: Their Power and Influence, is an excellent book to read on that. It goes through the Reece Commission and Norman Doddís report where they were told by the heads of the big foundations that sponsor MANY hundreds of other foundations across the planet, FRONT foundations and a thousand NGOs, non-governmental organizations. They found that their job was to change the culture in the West so much that it would blend seamlessly with that of the Soviet Union. Which tells you, they knew when the Soviet Union would stop being the Soviet Union and become Russia again. They also knew what kind of system this new conglomerate would be. Itís not hard to tell, if you create the culture to go along with it.
Remember in the 1960s, they had the international meetings in Britain, held in London, for the Royal Institute for International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, where in mainstream media they said, their job - in these big meetings - was to decide which country was to be given the premiership for creating the WORLD CULTURE. They looked towards the British studios, the old Pine studios and so on, and they decided no, it wasnít enough. Theyíd have to use HollywoodÖ and not just Hollywood, but the entire culture creation industry. Thatís music, drama, everything, stage drama as well. And itís been done. Perfectly. Itís been done so well with the aid of television, which has been used for that purpose since it was first given to the general public.
Getting back to Jacques Ellul. He said, thereís not a TV show to do with hospitals, anything to do with those servicesÖ Thatís health and policing. These were services at one time. The whole old idea was to bring them up to the status of authorities. That was the job of dramas on television, to give you a false perception of what they were really all about. Everyone knows if you watch these fictional versions of hospitals, every person in there and the staff know exactly what theyíre doing and they donít make mistakes. Itís perfect. Theyíre so holy they walk on water. They just know what to do. Always the right thing. The same with the cops. No matter what the bad guyís done and heís always a really, really bad guy. You have all these TEAMS of detectives chasing him through all kinds of hell to get that bad guy. And thatís what you think cops are all about, which is completely fictional. Itís propaganda.
The police forces have been built up to army status over a long period of time, maybe 20 years, in preparation for whatís coming down the pike in the very, very near future. The reports from the think tanks for the US AND the British military both came up with the SAME AGENDAS for the next 30 years. Same forecast. Rioting. Escalating riots. Right down to even having to use, basically, small-scale THERMONUCLEAR weapons on mass riots. Now, they donít sit and dream this stuff up because theyíve nothing else to do. Although they have a lot of time on their hands, thatís for sure. They mean what they say. Now, how do they know thereís riots coming up? You have to go through their PDFs. Iíve got them up on my site; go in to the archives section; look at the Department of Defence. Youíll find out WHY itís supposed to happen.
Food shortages will happen because food now is in the hands of a small monopoly. A monopoly. THEY OWN THE WORLDíS FOOD SUPPLY. That was always the plan, by the way, because at the United Nations, once again, who liked to portray itself as the big do-gooder who goes around handing out candy bars across the world to poor starving children, has very little to do with that kind of image at all. They are the most authoritarian body - set up to BE an authoritarian body - the world has ever seen. It is not a democratic institution. Its job is eventually to RULE over the people and you will do as youíre told.
A long time ago they decided, at the top - and the Club of Rome verified this in their own books, The First Global Revolution - that democracy would have to go. We are now IN the POST-DEMOCRATIC era. Democracy, they said, had too many conflicting parties to get any peace or to get anything done. Obviously, since thereís an agenda at stake here, they have to get things done. Therefore, they would have to go with a Ďparallel government.í Thatís what Margaret Thatcher talked about. She said she belonged to it. Professor Carroll Quigley, who was the mentor of Bill Clinton, also said the same thing in Tragedy and Hope. The Council on Foreign Relations is only one branch of the parallel government. Thatcher said, ALL ex Prime Ministers and Presidents, high bureaucrats of ALL states and countries are members of it because they all know each otherÖ and they can get things done behind the scenes without public scrutiny. They also donít have to answer to the public for anything that they do.
The Club of Rome said the system they favored the most was the collectivist society - COMMUNISM. Communism was the easiest way. The only way you can get it going is under the guise of warfare. Warfare or terrorism, itís the same thing, you see. You bring all the same functions that you use in warfare because the public will go along with things. Theyíll bend down more and do what theyíre toldÖ for peace and securityÖ for all. Therefore, the old slogan ĎWeíre all in it togetherí is back up again everywhere you look. ĎWeíre all in it together.í Thatís what they had everywhere in the movie Brazil, the comedy spoof on a totalitarian society which the author certainly knew was coming down the pike.
Weíre treated like children, as I say, with every darned thing thatís given to us. A little bit at a time. Just feed them a little. When a baby is crying youíll see how the mother feeds the child. Just a little bit at a time. If itís too much, the baby bubbles it out. Sheíll wait a little while longer and try it again. Thatís what they do with us, you see.
The security cameras, remember, were just going to go up at crossroads for traffic accidents and people flying across the red lights. Now theyíre everywhere. EverywhereÖ because itís world strategy. None of us, you see, can be expected to behave ourselves. Weíre all potentially criminals. From the Humanist point of view, thatís true. From the psychologistís point of view, thatís true. Because they all believe in the same thingÖ that weíre just an animal. Under the right circumstances, youíre capable of committing anything. Thatís how they judge the whole of society. Remember, too, if youíve got a psychopath judging society, heís going to see YOU as he sees himselfÖ because he IS capable of doing anything. Therefore, the only way you can treat children who will possibly commit a crime someday is to make sure theyíre in a prison, a straightjacket and youíre monitored 24 hours a day. That was also in Psychology Today, the big psychological magazine, YEARS ago. They wanted, eventually, cameras in everyoneís home watching everything they did.
Guess what? A lot of people are doing it voluntarily with their web camsÖ thinking itís fun. What do you think all those reality shows were about? Ö with the youngsters all thrown together in the big houses and cameras everywhere? Next thing you knew, youngsters were emulating that and putting it up on the web, what they were doing. Where did they get that from? Itís from television. Why did they sink so much money on television into showing that? To make the children copy them. Thatís why. Monkey see, monkey do. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt, weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, discussing how weíre treated like children. We have to be, from the big boysí point of view. You canít tell the public the truth. They could not tell us the truth 30 years ago, 40 years ago. They certainly could never have implemented the kind of security and snooping theyíve done on the average person 20 or 30 years ago. The public wouldnít have stood for it. We would not have stood for it, but little by little you get them changed because you change those things in their environment. Of course, the TV itself will change you. Itís behavior modification because itís in your environment and people are staring at the thing all the time. You do it mainly through fiction, occasional news blurbs and little by little, youíve been brought from there to thereÖ until the new there is quite normal. And you never reasoned through any of it. It just became normalÖ through time. Gradualism. You can do anything with a society with gradualism, if you have the power to do so.
Hereís an article I read on the 11th of this month. Itís from the Telegraph.
EU security proposals are 'dangerously authoritarian'
The European Union is stepping up efforts to build an enhanced pan-European system of security and surveillance which critics have described as ďdangerously authoritarianĒ.
By Bruno Waterfield in Brussels
10 Jun 2009
Civil liberties groups say the proposals would create an EU ID card register, internet surveillance systems, satellite surveillance, automated exit-entry border systems operated by machines reading biometrics and risk profiling systems. (Alan: Well guess what? Itís all EXACTLY whatís happening in Canada and the States and has been since the 90s, actually, with their Clear Pass system.)
Europe's justice ministers will hold talks on the "domestic security policy" and surveillance network proposals, known in Brussels circles as the "Stockholm programme", on July 15 with the aim of finishing work on the EU's first ever internal security policy by the end of 2009. (A: Quite something. Itís quite something.)
Critic of Euro-force given top position
Jacques Barrot, the European justice and security commissioner (A: They love to have commissioners. Itís like commissar isnít it? In the EU they call them commissioners. Thatís what the word commissar is.), yesterday publicly declared that the aim was to "develop a domestic security strategy for the EU", once regarded as a strictly national "home affairs" area of policy.
"National frontiers should no longer restrict our activities," he said. (A: Internationalism.)
You know, the last holdout, really, was the States. Not because the States was really any different. The States was really being used, since they took over the job from Britain, especially the payments for all this through their taxes and grants and so on. The US has been paying to BRING IN the new world order. It took over its role from Britain. It has been since World War I. The League of Nations was set upÖ see, the US set up the League of Nations and funded that too, that became the United Nations. Now that the job of the US is almost complete, as Iíve said before many times for years, when theyíre finishing off the job of standardizing the world - and the Middle East and whatís leftÖ about the only places that are left are a few countries in the Middle East - theyíll be pulling the rug out from under your feet at home to make you blend in with the flattened world itís created.
Those in charge of the US were always internationalists. They donít see the peasant in the US any different from the peasant in Britain or the peasant in China. NOT if youíre superior in your gene pool and youíre more evolved than others. Thatís what they really believe at the top. They truly believe this stuff. Youíd better be very scared because these people who really believe it have accumulated incredible wealth, which is power in this system, therefore they CAN create their kind of world with or without our consent. Theyíve been planning for both.
In the US, theyíre really catching up fast now. See, Bush was put in the last time to get the whole ball rolling for totalitarianism and Obamaís been put in to sign all the international agreements that were shelved over the years. And heís just signing one after another. Well, a dozen per dayÖ or more.
This is from The Los Angeles Times.
Lancaster, Pa., keeps a close eye on itself
The security cameras on the streets are monitored by civilians working for a nonprofit group. They pan, zoom and call police if they see a crime.
By Bob Drogin / June 21, 2009
A vast and growing web of security cameras monitors the city of 55,000, operated by a private group (A: A PRIVATE group.) of self-appointed gatekeepers. There's been surprisingly little outcry.
Reporting from Lancaster, Pa. -- This historic town, where America's founding fathers plotted during the Revolution and Milton Hershey later crafted his first chocolates, now boasts another distinction.
It may become the nation's most closely watched small city.
Some 165 closed-circuit TV cameras soon will provide live, round-the-clock scrutiny of nearly every street, park and other public space used by the 55,000 residents and the town's many tourists. That's more outdoor cameras than are used by many major cities, including San Francisco and Boston.
Unlike anywhere else, cash-strapped Lancaster outsourced its surveillance to a private nonprofit group that hires civilians to tilt, pan and zoom the cameras -- and to call police if they spot suspicious activity. No government agency is directly involved. Unlike anywhere else, cash-strapped Lancaster outsourced its surveillance to a private nonprofit group that hires civilians to tilt, pan and zoom the cameras -- and to call policeÖ† (A: Iíll be back with more after this break.)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from the Los Angeles Times on Lancaster, Pennsylvania where theyíre putting in all these cameras. Theyíve actually got them in and probably putting more it. It says here theyíre putting in more than major cities, like San Francisco and Boston,
Unlike anywhere else, cash-strapped Lancaster outsourced its surveillance to a private nonprofit group (A: Iíd love to know who they are or at least whoís putting up the cash. The Feds gave them 2 grants apparently to get it rolling but are there some foundations at work here too? Someone had to set it up and hire the civilians and all the other volunteers. These volunteers arenít even screened by police to watch everyone else.) that hires civilians to tilt, pan and zoom the cameras -- and to call police if they spot suspicious activity. No government agency is directly involved.
Perhaps most surprising, the near-saturation surveillance of a community that saw four murders last year has sparked little public debate about whether the benefits for law enforcement outweigh the loss of privacy.
(A: Hereís what the Lancaster police chief said. It takes a police chief to say the obviousÖ although heís not against it obviously, but heís saying the obvious.)
"Years ago, there's no way we could do this," (A: See, they couldnít have done this years ago. Years ago, thereís no way we could do this. Now, why can they do it now? Why is that? What happened to the people over the years? Well, they watch so much fiction and cops busting down doors that they really believe that crime is rampant everywhere and itís in the limits of law to smash down doors without warrants and all that kind of stuff. They really have been TRAINED that living is just a scary thing to do. Itís a scary thing to live. We need all of this intrusion. Theyíve been TRAINED.† You TRAIN people incrementally over time to accept this. So hereís the police chief saying that.) said Keith Sadler, Lancaster's police chief. "It brings to mind Big Brother, George Orwell and '1984.' It's just funny how Americans have softened on these issues." (A: No kidding.)
"No one talks about it," agreed Scott Martin, a Lancaster County commissioner who wants to expand the program. (A: Heís obviously got friends that help to warm his hands, Iíd say.) "Because people feel safer. (A: They feel safer.) Those who are law-abiding citizens (A: Here we go with that old theory. Those who are law abiding citizensÖ), they don't have anything to worry about." (A: Iíve got articles repudiating all this stuff. Refuted. BECAUSE thereís a whole bunch of psychology that goes with this kind of indoctrination. It STOPS people from being healthy and spontaneous. When youíre on camera all the time, you donít behave normallyÖ at any time. They know this too. Perhaps we should put these characters on camera all the time and watch them. After all, they got jobs over you. Why donít we watch them all the time? Hmm? Those are the ones we should be worried about.)
A few dozen people attended four community meetings held last spring to discuss what sponsors called "this exciting public safety initiative." (A: ha!) But opposition has grown since big red bulbs, which shield the video cameras, began appearing on corner after corner.
Mary Pat Donnellon, head of Mission Research, a local software company, vowed to move if she finds one on her block. "I don't want to live like that," she said. "I'm not afraid. And I don't need to be under surveillance." (A: There are people, you see, that donít like it at all.)
"No one has the right to know who goes in and out my front door," agreed David Mowrer, a laborer for a company that supplies quarry pits. "That's my business. That's not what America is about."
Hundreds of municipalities -- including Los Angeles and at least 36 other California cities -- have built or expanded camera networks since the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001. In most cases, Department of Homeland Security grants helped cover the cost.
In the most ambitious project, New York City police announced plans several years ago to link 3,000 public and private security cameras across Lower Manhattan designed to help deter, track and detect terrorists. (A: What a lot of rubbish, eh?)
This is nothing to do with terrorism. What this has to do with is the system theyíre bringing in that you have seen on the sci-fi movies where the majority of the public are either staving or living in rubble. Thereís a big army of black-clad goons with big, big guns bossing it over them. Thatís what it has to do with, but you canít tell the children. You canít tell the children.
Iíll go to the phones now. Weíll talk to Stephen in Texas. Are you there Steve?
Steve: Yes Iím here Alan. Can you hear me?
Alan: Yes I can.
Steve: Good afternoon Alan. This is my second time calling in. Iím from Houston. I was calling in regards to last weekís show you did about the dome that theyíre proposing to build over my city. I just wanted to know, really, what was the purpose of it? I saw Zeitgeist addendum, the second follow up to the first issue, where they had dome cities and it was super high-tech. They had light rails and things of that nature. Could you elaborate more on that? What was the purpose of building domes over cities?
Alan: The long-term strategyÖ This first came out, by the way, and I have articles here - Iíll put them up tonight on my web site - going as far back as the 1960s when they first brought this out in major US magazines. Now, it doesnít go over and this is the thing that struck me with the one for Toronto. Youíll find that they donít go over the whole of existing cities. Itís quite amazing that since Obama, last week, announced that they were going ahead to knock down a lot of the urban areas around the cities that no longer, he claims, need all of this housing. They concentrate the people into the centers. I guess it would fit in to the NEW city which is much, much smaller that the old. That will be the same with Toronto. But the future, of course, is to contain a much smaller population, as well. Their idea of how theyíre going to push it to the people is that it will stop UV rays, number one. It will be much cheaper to heat the place in winter, air conditioning it in the summer, than having people doing it independently on their own. Now, Buckminster Fuller was the first one that was put out to the public. Again, they always give us our stars and he influenced a lot of people, a lot of youngsters. He was the one who first came forward with this geodesic dome idea. His early domes were even bought by many Russian communities. They could bring them across by big, big Chinook helicopters, drop them in forests and they were fully furnished. They could just move right in to them. But they wanted to do this with massive domes over the cities. The problem with the older geodesic domes is they leaked like crazy. Anyone who got them found it leaked like crazy. This new type of system theyíre bringing in is going to be, supposedly, space age technology, a special sort of Plexiglas stuff and special frames to do away with that. The idea, supposedly, is that everyone within this city will travel under ground by subway. Public transportation only. It will fit in with Agenda 21, from the United Nations. The United Nations, by the way - I have articles here from them and a book was sent to me from one of them - showing me these domed cities and some areas. In some areas theyíre going to put up 3 domed cities. One will be for juniors, for children to be brought up collectively. The second one is after theyíve had their schooling and so on in their first dome, they get put in to their work dome for life and then they get put in to a retirement dome. So everything is nice, clean and tidy according to a psychopathic control freakís point of view. Thatís the kind of world of order they want to bring in. Itís for a brand new civilization, really. Thatís what itís for. They claim, too, they can control greenhouse gases and all this yada-ya stuff by ventilation inside the domes.
Steve: They claim they can do, with regard to the aerosol spraying, to deflect the UV rays and itís going to protect us from global warming. Itís a complete farce.
Alan: Yes it is.† It is, but you realize, once you get people IN to believing that this is the only way to live - and all you need is ONE generation - they will think itís all quite normal and you can then keep the population down, under rigorous control, by authority and law, etcÖ to save the rest. ĎWeíre all in it together.í Again, the same idea. You could literally go on for centuries like that never knowing that thereís a big, big world out there thatís pretty pristine and untouched.
Steve: Going back to what you were saying, they give us our stars and how the media is used to control us. Like you say, life imitates art. If you go back to the Simpsonís movie that came out, that happened with Homer. He contaminated the cityís river and the EPA had to put a dome over the city of Springfield and they were under constant surveillance by the government. You couldnít go in the city, you couldnít exit the city. So they show us these things in our movies and then they turn around and do it in real life and we donít think otherwise.
Alan: Thatís right. Thatís exactly right.
Steve: One more point Iíd like to make, Alan, was in regards to Obama. Iím an African-American and of course, in our community this is a milestone for us to have a black President but listening to your show and the other shows, I see the big picture. I found it real hard to explain it to other African-Americans that Obama is just nothing more than just a repeat of Bush, Clinton and previous other Presidents. Because, if youíre President and you want to inflict real change, you end up sort of like John F Kennedy, they will take you out. If you go along with the game plan, then youíre allowed to stay in. Is that pretty much how it works?
Alan: Thatís right. I mean, itís the same system that put in every other President that put Obama in. Heís standing up for the same boys too. Immediately, he stood up for the banks and rewarded them for looting the people. They always put their own boys in, you know.
Steve: Itís false hope because they give my community the sense that we finally won and we finally achieved because thereís someone that looks like us in office. But we donít really see the big picture that heís just another one, another dummy, just like all the other Presidents.
Alan: Yes. Absolutely. Youíd never get in unless you were.
Steve: Correct. Well, thanks again for taking my call and I enjoy listening to your show and a donation will be on the way.
Alan: Thanks for calling. Now, thereís Alan from England. Are you there Alan?
Alan-England: Hi, Alan. How you doing man? Iím calling from Devon in England and itís quarter to 2 in the morning. Anyway, I have spoken to you before and Iíve been in the music business, like you, and all the rest of it. You guys are talking about Obama. I actually just switched you on, online, so I didnít know what the earlier discussion was, but I heard a little about Obama and I can understand thereís a lot of confusion over that one. I mean the global changes, weíve seen a lot of changes with a lot more police/citizen brutality and things like that going on. You hear it or you see it on YouTube, that kind of thing. Reports of terribleÖ like a building up of something going on.
Alan: Youíre right. Itís a building up. Part of it is conditioning the public that this is going to be normal and if thereís no police prosecuted and really seem to be punishedÖ
Alan-England: We saw the G20, for example, and someone got murdered, someone got killed, actually got killed in the G20 thing recently. These sort of thingsÖ Itís going on globally. This is the point. But on a more, sort of like, higher level, itís like a parting of a wave, Alan, I feelÖ as a musician. Iím not a politician. Iím not a soldier or politician. I donít know. Iím not an expert. You research all these things and you just look into it yourself and you make up your own mind, you know what I mean? Iím a musician like you. Itís like a parting of the waves of consciousness, if you like. There are people that are awakening. But at the same time, thereís a lot of people who are kind of likeÖ I donít know, theyíreÖ I donít know what the word isÖ. deflating into this kind of denial thing and they just, you know, they donít want to know. Itís very weird to observe.
Alan: Iíve seen it in the public. Iíve seen it before. When they go in to denial when the economyís gone really bad, in the 70s I saw this same thing. When there were suicides in almost every street and it was kept quiet except for the general public around them. Even neighbors didnít want to talk about it. It was almost as though youíd catch bad luck and get fired yourself or lose your job if you talked about it.
Alan-England: The thing is, Alan, with respect forÖ Youíre a greatÖ You know your history and all the rest of it. Iíve heard a lot about you and I listen to you a lot. Thatís what you teach. Right. The point is, is that this is nothing new. What weíve got today is the 21st century version of it. Thatís what people should think about. Using the lower levels of the brain, you know, and not the higher levels, and thatís the key to this. People have got to realize what they really are and why theyíre here and all the rest of it. Thatís what itís really all about.
Alan: This is the thing. See, hereís the thingÖ
Alan-England: Itís that kind of revolution, in other words. Itís notÖ
Alan: Huxley talked about it and so did Bertrand Russell. They said that an essential part of their plan was to promote apathy amongst the people.† Thatís what people have to get over.
Alan-England: When you read books like that you think, my God, they donít want anybody to go anywhere. So they want them to remain on the top levels and everyone elseÖ I understand all that. Thatís not hard to understand.
Alan: Thatís what the public HAVE to regain, is the fact that YOU ARE AN INDIVIDUAL, UNIQUE BEING. If people started to realize thatÖ
Alan-England: I think thatís the biggest secret of all.† The biggest secret of all is about consciousness. Itís like theyíre keeping a lid on it and theyíre in withdrawal, Alan.† Theyíre on the run, mate.† Theyíre trying to keep the lid on it whatís going on right now. Thatís my feeling. Itís a positive message.† Iíll stay in touch with you.
Alan: Do that.† Weíll talk again.
Alan-England: You know. Divine source creators, I call it.
Alan: You take care of yourself, as well.
Alan-England: Iíll do. Bye to you and all your guests. Bye.
Alan: Bye, now. Itís true. You got to regain the fact that someone with a suit and tie standing on a stage with a bunch of troops around them, is no more important or less important than YOU. You see, weíve been trained for years now that youíre insignificant and you donít matter. Weíve got to say, wait a minute here, you technically, all you guys on the stage, are our servants and put them back in their place. We have the right to find our own destiny, personally and otherwise. Thatís the key to it. Itís not up to them to decide they want a controlled society of drones down the road. Thatís not living. Thatís death. Thatís death.
Weíll go to Clarence in Oklahoma. Are you there Clarence?
Clarence: Yes. Iím here, Alan. I havenít called in a while. Itís great to talk to you again.† I was just thinking, listening to you this evening. I pulled out a movie from my DVD collection that I saw when I was a very young person - and this will date me - at the local theater, when they had a theater in every town, instead of these big chain theaters. Itís called Zulu.
Alan: I remember that.
Clarence: As you talked, I suddenly realized people watch these things but they donítÖ itís like a curtain in front of them. They see whatís in front of them but they donít know whatís behind it. They know the events. The events are remunerated in history, based on a true storyÖ
Alan: Clarence, hold on and weíll come back after this break on that topic.
Hi folks. This is Alan Watt and weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, talking to Clarence from Oklahoma who was mentioning the movie Zulu. Are you still there Clarence?
Clarence: Yes. Iím here. What struck me and I like that Cutting Through The Matrix thing because thatís what it is. When I saw that as a youngster on the big screenÖ Now, that Iíve grown older and thanks to the internet - which is the biggest encyclopedia in the world - I now understandÖ. I donít understand things thoroughly, but Iím learning. One thing I have learned, things are not what they seem to be on the surface. There is something behind everyÖ in particular, human affairs. Human beings are not, you know, you take them as they are. I take them genuine unless I find out otherwise. But, going back to the movie, the movie was aboutÖ and I thought, itís a big, rah-rah movie and itís 11 Victoria Crosses were awarded forÖ
Alan: Thatís right. Iíve got a BritishÖ
Clarence: More than any other action in British military history.
Alan: Against the Zulus and they were in there building bridges for their railroad tracks to loot the country for the big boys back home.
Clarence: Exactly. It finally occurred to me. This whole thing happened and people thought, ainít this great. Look, I served in the United States Air Force during the Viet Nam war. I wasnít in Viet Nam, fortunately, I sat it out in Germany. But I thought I was serving the people. I thought I was serving the nation. Now, I know what I was really serving. I was serving a cabal. This goes back to Zulu. That was the British Empire.
Alan: Thatís right. In the movie itself, it would make you cheer them on thinking these are our guys, but they were not our guys. They were there to protect the industry and get all resources out of Africa. So how itís presented will distort the whole perception of the actual event and what was taking place.
Clarence: Exactly. They just look at the surface. They donít know whatís behind it. Itís not that difficult to find out whatís behind it. Now I understand that my service was to an international cabal of corporations and bankers that are tied together. Itís an incestuous relationship. The international corporations, they own the resources and thatís what it boils down to is resources. There is no wealth in this world other than resources. GoldÖ thatís a nice, fine thing but thereís only so much gold. But resources, thatís wealth. And thatís what all the fightingís going to be about.
Alan: Thatís whatís happening right now as they loot the oil out of the Middle East. This is ongoing. Theyíve actually published papers from the military calling it Ďresource warsĎ. So, youíre right on. Itís always been that way, but itís always to be put in to the hands of the few. Itís never for the public anywhere. Itís always for the few who already own the resource supply; they add to their stockpile.
Clarence: It always gets me and Iíll say this quick because I hear music coming up. What gets me is that people think theyíre fighting and they put out the banners and the music and the bands. They can fool the people. They can fool the average person to go fight for that.
Alan: Thatís what theyíve always done. Itís a tribal instinct to drum up in the public without telling the public the rest of the story.
Clarence: Absolutely. Thank you.
Alan: Thanks for calling. A good book to read is Shaka Zulu. Excellent story on the founding of the Zulu nation.
From Hamish and myself in Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
security proposals are 'dangerously authoritarian' " by Bruno Waterfield
(telegraph.co.uk) - June 10, 2009.
"Lancaster, Pa., keeps a close eye on itself" by Bob Drogin (latimes.com) - June 21, 2009.
"The Case for a Domed City" [Original Manhattan Dome Proposal] by R. Buckminster Fuller (waltlockley.com at web.archive.org) - Sept 26, 1965.
Transcribed by Diana