"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#277)
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Mar. 16, 2009:
Prophesying Computers--People Freaked as Crisis Tweaked:
"Welcome to the Age
You Don't have a Pass--You Can't Leave the Nation,
Essential Travel Only, the Wave of the Future,
For CEOs and Politicos of Haute Couture,
Fewer Travellers will Help Reduce Air Pollution,
Populations are to Dwindle, Aiding the Solution,
Every Sci-Fi Nightmare into Computers They Cram,
Crying Wolf! Wolf! for the Climate Change Scam,
The Old Shanks Pony, Once Again the Commuter,
The Mighty One has Spoken, Special-Made Computer,
Devoid of Human Folly, Free from Human Vices,
Just Feed the Info in for an Endless Flow of Crises"
© Alan Watt Mar. 16, 2009
Monday 16th March 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Mar. 16, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on the 16th of March 2009.
For newcomers: I advise you to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website and download as many of the previous talks that I've given. There are lots of audios there, hundreds of them, in fact, where I try to give you short-cuts to understanding the big picture of that which runs our system. It's not really our system - the one we're born into - and the ones that some people would say are the franchise owners and we get to see the managers.
Also look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu where you can find written transcripts of these talks. You can print them up; they're written in the various languages of Europe, and you can pass them round to your friends.
On www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com you can find out how to keep me going, by buying the books I have for sale, the discs, etc. That keeps me going, or you can donate as well.
This morning I got up, it should be a Spring morning really, we're into March now; and there's a sunny sky with this mush everywhere. This sprayed mush with the trails across the sky, criss-crossing, from the jet planes, in a little place, near Sudbury, where, I think two aircraft come in per day, to the little airport there and that's about it. However, it's all these aircraft spraying back and forth, in their spray patterns and everybody's wheezing, everybody is wheezing with this chemical mush that's coming down from the skies. No one's going to talk about this, it's like the global warming fiasco, it's a mandate and they're going to go through with it, regardless of all the evidence to the contrary, they're going to go through with it, to control the world. Well, it's the same with this spraying: it's a mandate and no one's going to touch this in mainstream media. It's a must-be, obviously.
Apart from all the effects on the weather and our health, which is disastrous in itself, I'm sure it's also quieting the people you might say, because people are somehow drugged today, there's no doubt about it, they're not reacting to the situations around them, the situations which are now overwhelming in controlling their lives. There's hardly a reaction from most people in the street. Whether it's just shock as to what's happening or whatever, who knows? Or is it the fact that they've been dumbed down so much with TV trivia, inoculations, GMO food and now the spraying on top, we'll never get to the bottom of all of it. People are certainly not reacting the way they should be to what's happening in their surroundings, including what's right above their heads; it's astonishing. And I think I've mentioned before that a member of Parliament from Sudbury, went to Ottawa and brought it up in the Parliament building for Canada about the spraying and what's what going on; and I think it was the Minister for Defence, Department of Defence, said they don't have to answer that question. So, it comes under National Security; and every country, it's the same thing, it's National Security. And I guess it depends how you view what the nation is, is the nation a corporation owned by a few? And if we all knew what was happening to us, by the few, would we be upset about it? Is that why? Is that why? If it's National Security, it’s their nation, because we don't seem to have any say in the matter whatsoever. Disgusting and scary as I say, hardly any reaction from the public, we're being blitzed every day, with the clouds coming down from the sky.
I’ll be back with more - after these messages.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix. I've gone over, in the past, some of the history of when the great idea was born to deal with Free Trade. I've gone back into time and into the 1500s, when the first openly Rosicrucian court was formed in Queen Elizabeth the 1st's time, when of most of her members around her were members of the Rosicrucian lodge; that was Bacon and Dee and all these characters. And how Dee came up with the idea of the Brightish Empire he called it, an idea based upon a system of free trade; and everyone who would come into that empire would become part of the Empire. In other words: you'd alter your rules and your laws and customs, to suit that that England was already based upon, from that particular court that is.
That idea, again, took off, in the time of Cecil Rhodes, who came up with the idea of free trade, once again, it was really the same stream, down through time; but he pushed it a step forward and formed a private organisation which became, eventually, the Cecil Rhodes Foundation for World Government, based on the system of freed trade and amalgamation, which merged, eventually, into the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Since then, in the twentieth-century, we've had wars to amalgamate Europe together; and, presently, we're amalgamating the Americas, under the guise of terrorism and safety and Fortress America they call it. They're doing the same with Africa and the Pacific Rim region as well, that was all part of the Royal Institute’s plan, of international affairs I should say, because there's the Royal Institute and the Royal Institute of International Affairs. It was the RIIA's plan to bring in this world, with its trading blocs, under a world government. That's the United Nations. When they did the NAFTA North American Free Trade negotiations, it was a copy, basically, of that of Europe, prior to the amalgamation, where it said the free flow of goods and labour would cross borders. Well, you understand: someone who's travelling to get to another country, doesn't have to be going as labour, they might be going to be on a visit, a holiday, to visit relatives and so on. Well, see, all that would be done away with; and you won't be able to eventually just move across a border to get a job, to look for a job. The corporations will have to put your name down and bring you in, that's how it will be; it'll be those who are wanted only and that was brought out by Jacques Attali's books, the actual book itself was called Millennium: Winners And Losers In The Coming New World Order. That was printed about 1990 and he said the same thing, it'll be those who are stuck inside their countries will be just wallowing in poverty and that the next boat people will probably be Americans, trying to get off the continent for work abroad. And, lo and behold, look at all that's happened since 1990-1991.
That's the con of double-speak, everybody who has been for world government at the bottom levels, all these little NGOs that are all well-funded and paid for, think it's going to be a wonderful utopia, where you can go where you please. It's not to be that way at all, as they bring the populations down. Yes, goods for the big international corporations will be free flowing across borders; and those who are employees of big corporations will also be able to go across the borders, back and forth, for business purposes. Labour can be hired, but you'll be brought into a country only if those corporations need you to be brought in; and that's why, under all this guise of terrorism, they're basically caging everyone in. A few weeks ago, I read on the air an article about the Minister in Britain, the Minister for the Environment saying, and stating quite categorically, that part of what they're doing at airports, with the fees etc, the carbon fees and all the other things they're going through, is to dissuade people from travelling, to dissuade them from travelling. They're making it harder, more difficult, more inconvenient, to try and travel and here's the next kicker to this very topic, because it comes from the Telegraph. Now this is going to be world-wide, whatever Britain's doing, we're doing everywhere else at the same time, under the Anglo-American rules, this “special relationship” that we have with this group in Britain. This is from March the 14th, 2009:
All travel plans to be tracked by Government
The travel plans and personal details of every holidaymaker, business traveller and day-tripper who leaves Britain are to be tracked by the Government, the Daily Telegraph can disclose.
That tells you how they co-operate with governments too, it's just an essential arm of government, media: "The Daily Telegraph can disclose". What can't they disclose?
By David Millward, Transport Editor.
Anyone departing the UK by land, sea or air will have their trip recorded and stored on a database for a decade.
Ten years and you know it's going to be permanent.
Passengers leaving every international sea port, station or airport will have to supply detailed personal information as well as their travel plans. So-called "booze cruisers" who cross the Channel for a couple of hours to stock up on wine, beer and cigarettes will be subject to the rules.
In other words: you're not going to bother going, if you have to fill out all these forms for a quick trip anywhere. And there's a whole bunch of links to it and then it goes on, it says:-
In addition, weekend sailors
That's your yachting crew.
and sea fishermen will be caught by the system if they plan to travel to another country - or face the possibility of criminal prosecution. The owners of light aircraft will also be brought under the system, known as e-borders, which will eventually track 250 million journeys annually.
Even swimmers attempting to cross the Channel and their support teams will be subject to the rules which will require the provision of travellers' personal information such as passport and credit card details,
What are you going to spend in the middle of the water, when you're swimming across it?
home and email addresses and exact travel plans.
The full extent of the impact of the government's "e-borders" scheme emerged amid warnings that passengers face increased congestion as air, rail and ferry companies introduce some of the changes over the Easter holidays.
The new checks are being introduced piecemeal by the UK Border Agency. By the end of the year 60 per cent of journeys made out of Britain will be affected with 95 per cent of people leaving the country being subject to the plans by the end 2010. Yachtsmen, leisure boaters, trawlermen and private pilots will be given until 2014 to comply with the programme.
They will be expected to use the internet to send their details each time they leave the country and would face a fine of up to £5,000 should they fail to do so. Similar penalties will be enforced on airlines, train and ship operators if they fail to provide details of every passenger to the UK Border Agency. In most cases the information will be expected to be provided 24 hours ahead of travel
It'll take you 24 hours to fill it out.
and will then be stored on a Government database for around ten years. The changes are being brought in as the Government tries to tighten border controls and increase protection
You see, it's protection you see.
against the threat of
The big bogie man. You can see how this is being used to completely alter our entire way of living. I've said before that this whole idea of terrorism had to be done, it was a must be, to get the whole ball rolling towards the global New World Order system. 9/11 had to happen, because they were counting on it, they'd been counting on it for years; they’d planned it years ahead. The twenty-first century was to be kicked off as an era of transition to an entirely new way of living. And the academy boys, the professors were talking about this for years, the twenty-first century, time for transitions, years and years before 9/11 happened.
So, there you go, it had to happen, it did happen, on cue, and the only people who didn't know what was going to happen, was George Bush and his boys, apparently; everyone else on the planet knew it. So, it went ahead, as planned; now we have the outcome. Under the guise of that, we're hit at the same time with environment and all this global warming nonsense, to add to it, to make sure that we change along this planned destination to a totally-controlled world society. That's what it's all about, all about. Now it's time to cage us in the countries, because remember, eventually, the United Nations is supposed to distribute the food to each country, when it comes up to its full strength and power, that's what it was designed to do. I've read the articles before, from the UN, when it was set up, that department for food and agriculture, stating that that would eventually be its task and the task would be to keep the populations under control. It would get 'x' amount of food, according to your population, that's how they'll start it off, it'll be fine for a year or two and then they'll say: 'Gee, we've got a shortage, we'll have to cut it back, you'll have to make sure there's not so many people in your country, how you do it is your own affair'. That's how it's going to play out, you mark my words; and every couple of years, it’ll be the same, there'll be less and less food and new laws come into your own country, right down to mandatory: mandatory abortions, for some; and mandatory sterilisation will be another part of it too. Then we'll get the little greenies, at school, totally indoctrinated - they'll volunteer to be sterilised, to save the world and save mother earth. This is not science fiction, this is the plan; you wait and see, this will definitely, definitely happen.
Another article that came from the Telegraph, on the other side of it, the great global warming scam idea. This is by Christopher Booker, it says:
Nobody listens to the real climate change experts
The minds of world leaders are firmly shut to anything but the fantasies of the scaremongers, says Christopher Booker.
I'll read this article, when I come back from these messages.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks I'm Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article by Christopher Booker, from the Telegraph on the global warming scam; and he says here, this was on the 14th March 2009. He says:
Considering how the fear of global warming is inspiring the world's politicians to put forward the most costly and economically damaging package of measures ever imposed on mankind,
It's true: EVER imposed on mankind, the most damaging package of measures ever imposed on mankind, that's a truth.
it is obviously important that we can trust the basis on which all this is being proposed. Last week two international conferences addressed this issue and the contrast between them could not have been starker.
The first in Copenhagen, billed as "an emergency summit on climate change" and attracting acres of worldwide media coverage, was explicitly designed to stoke up the fear of global warming to an unprecedented pitch. As one of the organisers put it, "this is not a regular scientific conference: this is a deliberate attempt to influence policy".
Well, that's exactly what it was; and who funds all this, eh? Guess - they're the big boys again, the Foundation boys that own the United Nations. It says here:
What worries them are all the signs that when the world's politicians converge on Copenhagen in December to discuss a successor to the Kyoto Protocol, under the guidance of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), there will be so much disagreement that they may not get the much more drastic measures to cut carbon emissions that the alarmists are calling for.
In other words: they've got to hype it up really-really big, you know, to get all their funding, etc, etc.
Thus the name of the game last week, as we see from a sample of quotations, was to win headlines by claiming that everything is far worse than previously supposed.
So, the first supposition: it's far worse, always supposing, supposing is worse then supposing.
Sea level rises by 2100 could be "much greater than the 59cm predicted by the last IPCC report".
I've been hearing about this my whole life. I can remember when I was about 15, they said, by now most of the islands in the Caribbean should be under three feet of water. Same group, same group were howling about that then. It didn't happen, didn't happen.
Global warming could kill off 85 per cent of the Amazon rainforest, "much more than previously predicted".
Or guessed at, I would add.
The ice caps in Greenland and Antarctica are melting "much faster than predicted". The number of people dying from heat could be "twice as many as previously predicted".
Or guessed at.
None of the government-funded scientists making these claims were particularly distinguished,
In other words: they were all third-raters but they're yes men who get paid well for being yes men.
but they succeeded in their object, as the media cheerfully recycled all this wild scaremongering without bothering to check the scientific facts. What a striking contrast this was to the second conference, which I attended with 700 others in New York, organised by the Heartland Institute under the title Global Warming: Was It Ever Really A Crisis? In Britain this received no coverage at all, apart from a sneering mention by The Guardian, although it was addressed by dozens of expert scientists, not a few of world rank, who for professional standing put those in Copenhagen in the shade.
Led off with stirring speeches from the Czech President Vaclav Klaus, the acting head of the European Union, and Professor Richard Lindzen of MIT, perhaps the most distinguished climatologist in the world, the message of this gathering was that the scare over global warming has been deliberately stoked up for political reasons and has long since parted company with proper scientific evidence.
Well, we all know that, those who listen to the show are aware of that.
Nothing has more acutely demonstrated this than the reliance of the IPCC on computer models to predict what is going to happen to global temperatures over the next 100 years. On these predictions, that temperatures are likely to rise by up to 5.3C, all their other predictions and recommendations depend, yet nearly 10 years into the 21st century it is already painfully clear that the computer forecasts are going hopelessly astray.
They're useless, all these computers - you know, it's no different than the old days, when, in the royal courts, kings and queens were surrounded by astrologers and fortune tellers, who'd advise them when to attack the country next door or across the water and they mumbled their mumbo jumbo, their own little scientific nonsense, because they all had their own little language you see, for their own particular political reasons, mainly to keep their heads on and to get rich around the king or the queen. It's the same thing here, here they just build computers to try and give them the answers they're looking for, that they want, that they want to hear. Anyone can do that; you can build a computer that can give you whatever you want to hear.
It says here:
Far from rising with CO2, as the models are programmed to predict they should, the satellite-measured temperature curve has flattened out and then dropped.
It's getting cooler.
If the present trend were to continue, the world in 2100 would not in fact be hotter but 1.1C cooler than the 1979-1998 average.
Now, we all know this, because we've been through one of the most severe winters we've had for years, regardless of all their hype about global warming. It says:
Yet it is on this fundamental inability of the computer models to predict what has already happened that all else hangs. For two days in New York we heard distinguished experts, such as Professor Syun-Ichi Akasofu, former director of the International Arctic Research Center, Dr Willie Soon of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics and Professor Paul Reiter of the Pasteur Institute, authoritatively (and often wittily) tear apart one piece of the scare orthodoxy after another.
I'll be back with more, after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix, reading an article from The Telegraph which debunks the whole global warming 'crisis' that's been all over the media, especially since the latest meeting of the IPCC. And this man, this report, goes on to say here, he says:
Sea levels are not shooting up but only continuing their modest 3mm a year rise over the past 200 years. The vast Antarctic ice-sheet is not melting, except in one tiny corner, the Antarctic Peninsula. Tropical hurricane activity, far from increasing, is at its lowest level for 30 years. The best correlation for temperature fluctuations is not CO2 but the magnetic activity of the sun. (For an admirable summary of proceedings by the Australian paleoclimatologist Professor Bob Carter, Google "Heartland" and "Quadrant").
Yet the terrifying thing, as President Klaus observed in his magisterial opening address, is that there is no dialogue on these issues. When recently at the World Economic Forum in Davos, he found the minds of his fellow world leaders firmly shut to anything but the fantasies of the scaremongers.
Well, you see, you've got to ask why, how come they're all on board with this, hmm? And they are, they're all on board, they've all been got at and told what their orders are.
As I said in my own modest contribution to the conference, there seems little doubt that global warming is leading the world towards an unprecedented catastrophe. But it is not the Technicolor apocalypse promised by the likes of Al Gore. The real disaster hanging over us lies in all those astronomically costly measures proposed by politicians, to meet a crisis which in reality never existed.
And that's true, but it's for a purpose: it's to control our behaviour, our purchasing, what we buy, how we live, right down to how many children, if any, you'll be allowed to have. It's a must-be; it's a must-be. You look at the big eugenicists at the top, the ones who have the foundations, that fund all these NGOs, who fund all the scare-mongers, and you'll find it's an old agenda, very old agenda. How do you get the public to capitulate and give up all their rights and privileges? You do it through terrorism and the threat that man himself is going to destroy the planet, man is at war with the planet; those two things. And it's happening right now; and they wrote about it, in their big think-tanks, like the Club of Rome, and published it in their own books. Now it's happening; and you see all these prostitutes, called politicians, who climbed on board, because they smell which way the wind is blowing and they want it have it blow in their favour, go along with this, this scam.
The world is at war and the war is on the public, the entire public of the planet; and out of it, you'll have a totally-controlled society, by a group of private corporations that will own the resources of the entire planet. It's happening right now.
We’ve just been looted by the bankers, you know, the pinnacle of respectability in this system, because money is power; and they've had the right to run these Ponzi schemes over and over and collapse. They always give you 50-100 years to build up wealth and accumulate wealth and then they plunder you. Sometimes, they'll do it twice in a century and they've just done it again and they've been rewarded for doing it. It's the only system where you can be a criminal and get rewarded, truly rewarded for being a criminal and you suffer no jail time for doing so. Astonishing isn't it, when they go after little guys for failure for back taxes and these characters can literally swindle society out of billions of dollars and then get the governments, their pals, you know, to reward them for it, with the tax-payers' money, to keep the same corrupt system going.
This article here is from the New York Times:-
A.I.G. planning huge bonuses after $170 billion bailout
March 14th 2009, it says:
WASHINGTON: The American International Group, which has received more than $170 billion in taxpayer bailout money from the Treasury and Federal Reserve, plans to pay about $165 million in bonuses by Sunday
to executives in the same business unit that brought the company to the brink of collapse last year.
Well, they brought the public to the brink, well, over the brink of collapse.
Word of the bonuses last week stirred such deep consternation inside the Obama administration that Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner told the firm they were unacceptable and demanded they be renegotiated, a senior administration official said. But the bonuses will go forward because lawyers said the firm was contractually obligated to pay them.
It must be great when you also own the legal system, isn't it? You do what you want: plunder, loot, be rewarded and no one can come against you, because, you see, you own the legal system. Not that the Government is really-really that concerned, it was all pre-arranged, this guy who's complaining knows this. It says:
The payments to AIG's financial products unit are in addition to $121 million in previously scheduled bonuses for the company's senior executives and 6,400 employees across the sprawling corporation. Geithner last week pressured AIG to cut the $9.6 million going to the top 50 executives in half and tie the rest to performance.
"Performance"? They've done pretty well. Maybe that's why they're getting paid or rewarded?
The payment of so much money at a company at the heart of the financial collapse that sent the broader economy into a tailspin almost certainly will fuel a popular backlash against the government's efforts to prop up Wall Street.
I don't think most of the public really care much, they're too far gone; the television's still working.
Past bonuses already have prompted President Barack Obama and Congress to impose tough rules on corporate executive compensation at firms bailed out with taxpayer money.
Well, it's a bit too late, after they've given them the dough, isn't it?
AIG, nearly 80 percent of which is now owned by the government,
defended its bonuses,
This is the government defending the government!
arguing that they were promised last year before the crisis and cannot be legally cancelled. In a letter to Geithner, Edward Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of AIG, said at least some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.
Really? A few millions and a bonus?
"We cannot attract and retain the best and the brightest talent to lead and staff the AIG businesses
I think they've already done that, haven't they proven they all had the best and brightest? – they came up with this scam.
— which are now being operated principally on behalf of American taxpayers — if employees believe their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury," he wrote Geithner on Saturday.
They're so grateful these guys, so grateful for getting bailed out, they're dictating to Government. This is the farce we're living through, an utter farce; and you know there's people trying to keep this system in place at the bottom level, ordinary folk. 'Just don't let it get any worse, don't let it get any worse than it is, stop it right here and let me watch the TV and my soaps, or my sports, or whatever it happens to be and let me live my life.' That's what most folk want, 'just let me live my life and let the next generation take the brunt of hell.' Until people get out of that rut and start becoming very indignant and involved, we're all going down the tubes. I can remember Aldous Huxley saying, in one of his books - and one of his talks as well, at Berkeley - he said that most people would basically succumb to slavery quite happily and the sad fact is that's true, because you can have happy, amused, entertained slaves, with a modicum of personal freedom, to move from here to here, and then back again. To your work and back again or to the store and back again, into your little box, where you can be stuck in front of that TV tube, glowing away; and everything's normal to them. It wouldn't matter what's happening; and a few pennies to spend on toys and goodies, it wouldn't matter how corrupt the system was, because they've lost their ability to be indignant about anything, unless it's personally a pin sticking in their own body.
There's a caller on the line, I should take him, while he's still hanging on there; it's David from Georgia, are you there David?
David: Hello Alan, how are you?
Alan: I'm hanging in here, under these heavy sprays.
David: Good, good, it's better than being dead! Anyway, I hope you would be interested in the biography of Marie Thérèse, the daughter of Marie Antoinette. I found out some general trends and things going on in that era that are similar to ideas you bring up now, one being that the elites are really great perverts. There were some English spies that reported on Louis Charles, the Dauphin at the time and they said that the revolutionary committee were sending over prostitutes, to infect the Dauphin in prison and then they could accuse Marie Antoinette of child molestation; and this is a ten-year-old boy. So, that was indeed shocking, the other thing that was shocking was that there was this huge food shortage / famine, during the revolution and the warehouses were stocked full with wheat and the wheat was not circulating enough, so it started to rot; and there were wagon loads, after wagon loads of rotten wheat being thrown to the sea; obnoxious. The other thing is: these elites, they hold a grudge for a long time, centuries long.
Alan: Well, that's true, they give their speeches - and Rockefeller's a famous one for that - he always says, at the beginning of most of his speeches: you must understand your history and he's talking about his own family background as well and his own little class there, because they do learn from history and when they come close to being got at by the public for something, they find ways that it'll never happen again to them.
David: Well, if I could finish that thought please: the Madame Royale, she was called The Orphan Of The Temple, the temple was Templar Castle and the same castle, centuries ago, where Philip the Fair had sent some Knights Templar into the castle and had them burned to death. So, they imprisoned the same capiche in line that burned up the knights and, later on, they took their descendents and put them in the same temple! The irony of that is pretty rich.
Alan: Well, it's the same temple too that Lady Di died underneath, because that was on top above that tunnel, at that spot!
David: [Laughter] oh, Lord! And the other thing is they use factions, there was this man the Duke d'Orléans also called Philippe Égalité and he was a cousin to the king and he always wanted the throne of France. So, he stirred up trouble and accusations against Marie Antoinette and Louis the 16th and he thought that, when he was the big cheese at the committee, he could overthrow the committee and become the king instead. And what later happened was the committee later put him under the guillotine, so they do eat their own.
Alan: What they do is they use people and they'll back them, they'll say ‘we'll back you against this guy’ and you don't realise you're getting used and, once you've fulfilled your purpose of removing your predecessor, they remove you as well, absolutely.
David: The calumnies of that era are just astounding.
Alan: Getting back to the food thing that you were talking about too: because they dealt with the food shortage by literally taking lots of the peasants into the countryside and killing them; depopulation was part of their remedy.
David: Oh, definitely. Anyway, I thank you for your contributions to humanity and I hope you can keep up with the struggle and I'll keep up with the struggle as well and you have a good night.
Alan: Ok, and you too.
Alan: Bye now. Now, there's Mike from New York, are you there Mike?
Mike: Hello Alan, good evening.
Alan: How are you doing?
Mike: Happy St Patrick's Day, before I begin.
Alan: That's right; I heard that already today.
Mike: You were talking about corruption on Wall Street and also in politics. You know, I've lost count of the number of perspective appointees to the Obama administration that have accused themselves due to non-payment of taxes.
Alan: That's right, there's a huge list out now.
Mike: Now, to add insult to injury: the guy that's running the treasury now, the guy that you just referred to, Timothy Geithner. And don't forget that the IRS is under the Treasury, he himself has a tax problem, to the tune of $20 or 30,000 and claimed it was a problem with the turbo tax programme, hence the name ‘Turbo-tax Timmy’ now. But, you know, the audacity.
Alan: What it's showing you too is the fact that these guys all have something hanging over them, so they're going to be damn good boys to their masters.
Mike: Yeah, but it's not as if these guys are working in a minimum wage job.
Mike: They're not flipping hamburgers and they can only afford like 10 bucks a week, to pay off the tax liability. I mean, obviously, they have no intention of paying it.
Alan: That's right and it'll be written off anyway, because they're doing their little job now and they're being good boys.
Mike: Well, you know for a guy with a tax liability, to be, essentially, placed in charge of tax enforcement seems, to my philosophy at least, a bit sort of contradictory.
Alan: Only if you realise that these guys are all compromised, so they'll do whatever their bosses tell them.
Mike: Ok Alan, I just thought that'd I'd point that out. I mean: the plot thickens.
Alan: Oh, yeah and every guy that Obama's appointed so far is from the same old establishment, it’s all the upper establishment banking families.
Mike: Without a doubt, this is a Wall Street Cabinet; this is Wall Street on steroids.
Mike: It's all Goldman Sachs, ex-Goldman Sachs; you know, basically the Government, the political process has been taken over by Wall Street.
Alan: A long time ago, it's a continuation, you’ve got different front actors, different smiley faces and that's it.
Mike: Yeah, but now it’s in your face, there’s no pretence now.
Alan: Thanks for calling then; talk to you again.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt, we're Cutting Through The Matrix; and remember, I'll out these links up on the www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website after I go off the air tonight and you can look up the articles for yourself. There's one I want to mention and it's to do with these cellphone towers that are all disguised as trees and things. A main media station did a little talk on it and they show you how they made these things and disguise them all as rocks; and even building houses to contain them, so you don't know what's inside as they give off these massive amounts of radiation to all those around them. And people around them don't care much, as long as it looks nice, a nice camouflaged tower etc, in the shape of a tree and it's very pretty; they don't mind the radiation. So, I'll leave that link up there too, you should watch this little video.
There's one caller on the line, it's Amber, maybe we can just get you in; are you there Amber?
Amber: Hi, how are you?
Alan: Just hanging in under the mushy skies above me - that are causing everyone to wheeze.
Amber: I tuned in kind of late, were you talking about global warming earlier?
Alan: Yes, the scams that are going on - and the counters to them, from other scientists.
Amber: Because it's pretty funny, because it's just started snowing here! It's like big fat snowflakes.
Alan: And that's British Columbia and you're normally much milder there too.
Amber: Yeah and it's March! Global warming!
Alan: That's right, it’s quite the thing, but carry on.
Amber: Sorry, I was just wondering if you got the package I sent you.
Alan: I don't think so yet. I'll have to check the mail at the post office, it isn't so close, I have to travel and it’s in the country.
Amber: So you check it like once a week or whatever?
Alan: When I can get through the snow, to get to it, ha-ha!
Amber: Is it still snowing?
Alan: It's been on and off and now the roads have got maybe 5 inches of ice, that's the side roads, and that'll take a while, maybe a whole month to melt away, depending if they give us more snow or not, who knows what they've got lined up.
Amber: I didn’t really have a question, well I do kind of have a question: for a while I was trying to read all the books, about the New World Order, and trying to know everything I could about it, and get other people to know about it, but I'm having a hard time and I don't know, I'm just wondering if it would be more suitable to read about something more practical. Like if we are going to be in times of crisis, shouldn't I know how to, like I don't even know how to sew, things like that. Maybe I should just get a book on sewing! It's going to be more practical to know how to make …
Alan: I tell you, eating is going to be a big thing, just knowing how to get food to eat and how to cook it.
Alan: Gardening as well, because it's coming down fast and it's the basics they're going after in all wars: food, water, shelter, clothing; and if you depend on your government rations, which will come one day, maybe not too far away, you're going to be, you'll be at the mercy of the government, which is exactly what they want.
Amber: I know, I'm at the mercy of the government right now, I got laid off and the clinic closed and that you know. I get my little EI cheques, it's pretty sad; but I was reading this survival handbook and learning how to survive in different climates and stuff like that.
Alan: That's the end of the show for tonight.
Amber: Is it like my job to help people wake up too, or should I keep focussing on?
Alan: Focus on yourself first of all.
That's the music coming in for the end of the show. So, from Hamish and myself, in Ontario Canada, it's goodnight and may your god, or your gods, go with you.
Transcribed by Bill Scott.
Links to topics covered in the show:-
travel plans to be tracked by Government" by David Millward
(telegraph.co.uk) - March 14, 2009.
"Nobody listens to the real climate change experts" by Christopher Booker (telegraph.co.uk) - March 16, 2009.
"A.I.G. planning huge bonuses after $170 billion bailout" by Edmund L. Andrews and Peter Baker - Published: March 14, 2009.
Video: "Cell Phone Towers In Disguise (CBS News)" (youtube.com).