"Cutting Through The Matrix" Live On RBN (#240)
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 22, 2009:
CFR's Voracity for a Planned Society:
"Weaving a Plan
Men in Shadows Evaded Detection,
New World Order, No Variety,
Intelligentsia to Rule, Planned Society,
After Riots, Youth, All-Naivety,
Demanding a Just World of Sustainability,
Idealism Used for Good or Harm,
Summed Up in Orwell's 'Animal Farm,'
Old Wise Men Guide Youth to Utopia,
When Regime is In, You Have Dystopia,
Drab Collectivism Demands, in Its Fashion,
You Serve the State for Daily Ration"
© Alan Watt Jan. 22, 2009
Thursday 22nd January 2009
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 22, 2009 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and this is the 22nd of January 2009.
I always advise newcomers to look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com and, on the website, you'll find hundreds of talks I've given, over the years, where I've tried to give you a view of history, often history that's been stuck away somewhere, hidden from the general public, and then comes out in an occasional book or periodical, in old dry books. Generally, you have to go through lots and lots of books, very dry books, to find a little sentence or a paragraph that just stuns you; and, if you can keep awake going through them, then it really hits you, otherwise, you'll sleep right through it. I think that's why they write them that way, to be honest with you.
I try to give you the short cuts to seeing a picture, a big picture of, really, a controlled society, a society that, by proof and evidence, from books written by big players of their time, they can show you how mind control of whole populations is nothing new and that there certainly is a group that’s existed, at least on one side, one hemisphere of the planet, that ran the last 100 years and it’s presently running the future we're going into right now, in fact they're up there, negotiating between countries, going round governments and even advising governments as what to do. They've been at this forever and I've been trying to go through some of the history of this particular group that now, blatantly, comes out on television as the CFR, openly; and, most of the public, when they see that, talking to some politician, will think it's some governmental department, the Council on Foreign Relations, but it's not, it's a private organisation and it's the American branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs; a private organisation.
I've been going through Carroll Quigley's books, Professor Carroll Quigley, who was the historian for this group, for a while, and he went through all of the records, he was a big player himself, in his field; he advised the State Department, he advised Military Departments, he was well up on various topics and he obviously had to have been a member himself, even to get access to the records of this group that, literally, kept the magnitude of their implications in history out of the picture of the general books we get to see. He even wrote about that, how he was astonished at the power they wielded, for a hundred years and right up to the present. At least in his day anyway, that was the 1960s and it's still going yet, because they were in control of all periodicals, they had a lot of the men in politics at high positions. They ran the media completely and they were backed by the big banker families; the big banking families were all on board; and, that's something I'd like to get into, eventually, and go back into time, maybe after tonight's talk.
When we look at what's happening today: we're going into a global society, a global society that was the dream of the founders of the Royal Institute of International Affairs, that was their dream; and, it was a dream so fervent in their minds they didn't stop short of manipulating and creating wars, like the Boer War, to get their way; and, whole nations went to war, because of machinations behind the scenes, by many of their members. That's a hard thing for most people to believe today, but, it's documented, not in conspiracy books, but by professors who were involved in the organisation. Back with more - after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix.
I should also mention, before I go on: look into www.alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts of the talks I've given; and, you can print them up, they're written in the various languages of Europe. You can also look into www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com website, see what's for sale there; and, you can also donate to me as well, that keep me going. I won't be around forever; I can assure you of that.
Getting back to what I was talking about, was some of the histories that have led us up to where we are today. If you don't know these histories, you won't know why things are happening today; and, even with the rioting, that was predicted a long time ago, and is now breaking out all over the place, you can be pretty well guaranteed that there will be leaders who will step in and guide the new youth into the correct corral, once again, of sustainability, a new way of living, a new economic system; and, you'll serve the world state. All under this beautiful utopian guise that we will all be, technically, equal. Remember what equality is, and George Orwell said in Animal Farm: "some are more equal than others" in such utopias. There's always been a dominant minority, as Huxley said, and he said, in the same speech at Berkeley, he said "I presume there always will be”; he saw no reason why it shouldn't be, even in a scientifically-run dictatorship. We're really under that today, because that which runs us today is the science of the mind, science of the masses, which wasn't drummed-up or dreamed-up by Bernays, it was already understood long before him.
There's no doubt about it, those who control the money, control the world; and, Professor Carroll Quigley talked about this, because, after all, the big bankers were funding the particular groups, from Cecil Rhodes, Lord Milner, into the Royal Institute of International Affairs, the Round Tables, they were funding what was to be taught in universities. They were dishing out the grants as to where science should go and you've got to understand, science is now dictating our lives to us, as to how we should live and how the future is to be. It's all connected, because it's not evolving out of the imaginations of the general public, as we just drift along through time, it's planned that way. If you don't understand the present so-called Depression, which we're into, this financial depression, which went against all the rules of economics, because, in the Hidden Persuaders, Vance Packard said that one of the top economists had said that any economist saying the bad news to lose confidence in the people, of investors, was committing suicide. It was tantamount to heresy, he said. Why would a president come out and tell you that this crash that's coming could be worse than 1930s? That was guaranteed to stop everything; and, then, they already had their next man with his regime lined up to walk in and implement the next phase of it. The whole greening agenda, the new economic system, that which I've been talking about here, a new way of living, a new way of living; and you will always wonder who's behind it and everyone else will blame everyone else and they'll never know.
In Tragedy & Hope, by Carroll Quigley, he talks about the last Depression and you can pretty well put it to the present one as well. He says:
In the various actions which increase or decrease the supply of money, governments, bankers, and industrialists have not always seen eye to eye. On the whole, in the period up to 1931, bankers, especially the Money Power controlled by the international investment bankers, were able to dominate both business and government.
Well, that's not news to us, but they pretend they have nothing to do with government, they always will.
They could dominate business, especially in activities and in areas where industry could not finance its own needs for capital, because investment bankers had the ability to supply or refuse to supply such capital. Thus, Rothschild interests came to dominate many of the railroads of Europe,
Now, Rothschild, remember, he took over the will and the legacy of running the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, which was set up to bring in a world government, ultimately. So, from the very beginning of this organisation - and I don't think it was the beginning with Cecil Rhodes - the bankers were on board, with this agenda. He says:
He already mentioned Morgan, the Morgan family were heavily-involved with the CFR funding it, in all different directions.
Morgan dominated at least 26,000 miles of American railroads. Such bankers went further than this. In return for flotations of securities of industry, they took seats on the boards of directors of industrial firms, as they had already done on commercial banks, savings banks, insurance firms, and finance companies. From these lesser institutions they funnelled capital to enterprises which yielded control and away from those who resisted. These firms were controlled through interlocking directorships, holding companies, and lesser banks. They engineered amalgamations and generally reduced competition,
In other words: they were consortiums.
until by the early twentieth century many activities were so monopolized
They'd kicked out all competition and stifled it or smothered it.
that they could raise their non-competitive prices above costs to obtain sufficient profits to become self-financing and were thus able to eliminate the control of bankers. But before that stage was reached a relatively small number of bankers were in positions of immense influence in European and American economic life.
Now, here's where a famous statement was made, that's been copied many times, by many authors, going into the conspiracy side of it. This is by Professor Carroll Quigley:
As early as 1909, Walter Rathenau, who was in a position to know (since he had inherited from his father control of the German General Electric Company and held scores of directorships himself), said,
This is what he said:
"Three hundred men, all of whom know one another, direct the economic destiny of Europe and choose their successors from among themselves."
See that was already set up, a long time ago.
The power of investment bankers over governments rests on a number of factors, of which the most significant, perhaps, is the need of governments to issue short-term treasury bills as well as long-term government bonds. Just as businessmen go to commercial banks for current capital advances to smooth over the discrepancies between their irregular and intermittent incomes and their periodic and persistent outgoes (such as monthly rents, annual mortgage payments, and weekly wages), so a government has to go to merchant bankers (or institutions controlled by them)
Institutions controlled by them.
to tide over the shallow places caused by irregular tax receipts. As experts in government bonds, the international bankers not only handled the necessary advances but provided advice to government officials and, on many occasions, placed their own members in official posts for varied periods to deal with special problems. This is so widely accepted even today that in 1961 a Republican investment banker became Secretary of the Treasury in a Democratic Administration in Washington without significant comment from any direction. Naturally, the influence of bankers over governments during the age of financial capitalism (roughly 1850-1931) was not something about which anyone talked freely, but it has been admitted frequently enough by those on the inside, especially in England.
Even as far back as:
In 1852 Gladstone, chancellor of the Exchequer, declared, "The hinge of the whole situation was this: the government itself was not to be a substantive power in matters of Finance, but was to leave the Money Power supreme and unquestioned."
In other words: don't touch it.
On September 26, 1921, The Financial Times wrote, "Half a dozen men at the top of the Big Five Banks could upset the whole fabric of government finance by refraining from renewing Treasury Bills." In 1924 Sir Drummond Fraser, vice-president of the Institute of Bankers, stated, "The Governor of the Bank of England must be the autocrat who dictates the terms upon which alone the Government can obtain borrowed money."
In addition to their power over government based on government financing and personal influence, bankers could steer governments in ways they wished them to go by other pressures. Since most government officials felt ignorant of finance, they sought advice from bankers whom they considered to be experts in the field. The history of the last century shows, as we shall see later, that the advice given to governments by bankers, like the advice they gave to industrialists, was consistently good for bankers, but was often disastrous for governments, businessmen, and the people generally. Such advice could be enforced if necessary by manipulation of exchanges, gold flows, discount rates, and even levels of business activity. Thus Morgan dominated Cleveland's second administration by gold withdrawals, and in 1936-1938 French foreign exchange manipulators paralyzed the Popular Front governments. As we shall see, the powers of these international bankers reached their peak in the last decade of their supremacy, 1919-1931, when Montagu Norman and J. P. Morgan dominated not only the financial world but international relations and other matters as well. On November 11th, 1927, the Wall Street Journal called Mr. Norman "the currency dictator of Europe." This was admitted by Mr. Norman himself before the Court of the Bank on March 21st, 1930, and before the Macmillan Committee of the House of Commons five days later.
They admitted they basically ruled the world.
On one occasion, just before international financial capitalism ran, at full speed, on the rocks which sank it, Mr. Norman is reported to have said, "I hold the hegemony of the world." At the time, some Englishmen spoke of "the second Norman Conquest of England" in reference to the fact that Norman's brother was head of the British Broadcasting Corporation. It might be added that Governor Norman rarely acted in major world problems without consulting with J. P. Morgan's representatives, and as a consequence he was one of the most widely traveled men of his day.
Now these guys also ran the greatest big secret society, the greatest secret society that had many fronts and that's what I've been going over recently. Back with more - after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, going through the dry dusty books, that no one reads, because they're not terribly exciting and we're taught that 'well the past doesn't matter anyway' and yet, if you want to know what their plan is and when you want to know that you've actually been living out a good part of the plan, without even knowing it and who was behind it, then that's up to you. The media will keep you mesmerised forever, because it's the same boys who own the media who are giving you the stories you're now talking about today and the ones that you'll have tomorrow.
You've got to understand the whys and the wherefores, because, literally, a good part of the world has been run by an organisation with many front groups, using all of the sciences and the social sciences and the manipulative qualities of persuasion and mind control that Bernays talked about. In fact, I'm sure Bernays was one of them, one of the early group, because you don't come out at 24, I don't care if you are a nephew of Freud, and get to go along with the President, President Wilson, to set up the League of Nations, at the end of World War I. You don't get that kind of contact; someone must guide you in and announce you.
When you look at Wilson as well, Wilson was part of this group, President Wilson was part of the group and he was run - and the history's all documented in the Anglo-American Establishment, by Professor Carroll Quigley, that Colonel Mandell House was the one who ran Wilson and Mandell House was in cahoots and got his orders from Sir Grey, from London, he eventually became Lord Grey, Earl Grey. They passed the information on, from the Milner Group and the Cecil Rhodes Foundation, to the US counterparts and they worked through the President; and, their whole idea, already, was to set up a world government. The League of Nations was part of it; and, here's Bernays there, to write the propaganda for the world that came out in all languages, saying why they would have to have a world government; and, it wasn't just a world government, because, obviously, everything boiled down to economics and who funded them all? The bankers funded them all; they have the greatest interest in economics.
Very-very complicated but you have to, truly read the books; but, from the Anglo-American Establishment, on page 197, Quigley, remember, who was all for this group, he believed in their intentions, he believed that the intellectual elite had the right to rule the world, because, just like the psychiatrists of their time too, remember, many of them were members, especially the famous ones, who got their names and their theories in the newspapers, to brainwash us. They believed that the people down below were just too irrational to conduct themselves in an orderly fashion, without supervision. On page 197, Professor Carroll Quigley says this, talking about the English branch of the CFR (The Royal Institute of International Affairs):
This brief sketch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs does not by any means indicate the very considerable influence which the organization exerts in English-speaking countries in the sphere to which it is devoted. The extent of that influence must be obvious. The purpose of this chapter has been something else: to show that the Milner Group controls the Institute.
That was back then.
Once that is established, the picture changes. The influence of Chatham House
Remember that became the OSS Headquarters, because they already were the secret society, they were into everything across the globe.
The Influence of Chatham House appears in its true perspective, not as the influence of an autonomous body but as merely one of many instruments in the arsenal of another power.
This is a professor talking, he chooses his words carefully.
The influence of Chatham House appears in its true perspective, not as the influence of an autonomous body
They were a bunch of guys doing as they wished.
but as merely one of many instruments in the arsenal of another power. When the influence which the Institute wields is combined with that controlled by the Milner Group
Remember the Round Tables, Cecil Rhodes Society for world government and then Lord Milner group, all combined into the RIIA. It says what you see what they're into
in other fields in education, in administration, in newspapers and periodicals a really terrifying picture begins to emerge. This picture is called terrifying
Now, remember, he's going to be pro them, he thought they were all idealists.
not because the power of the Milner Group was used for evil ends. It was not.
On the contrary, it was generally used with the best intentions in the world, even if those intentions were so idealistic as to be almost academic.
If you’ll notice: the greening projects, the political correctness and all the rest of the stuff that we're getting today, it's all coming from the same source, by the way, that's from academia, that's how people above all the normal stations of life would view us all down below, it's academic. The Soviet System was run by this system too, where authors and poets and everyone, were getting called up in front of tribunals to make sure that all their wording was politically correct. So:
... the arsenal of another power
He talks about the fact that they controlled education, they were in administration in all levels, all positions and all bureaucracies and newspapers and periodicals, they owned the newspapers and the magazines that gave us our thought and ideas.
—a really terrifying picture begins to emerge. This picture is called terrifying not because the power of the Milner Group was used for evil ends. It was not. On the contrary, it was generally used with the best intentions in the world—even if those intentions were so idealistic as to be almost academic. The picture is terrifying because such power, whatever the goals at which it may be directed, is too much to be entrusted safely to any group.
This is a very important bit I'll do, right after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt Cutting Through The Matrix, going over some of the dry boring stuff, to some, but you won't know what's happening now, you definitely won't know what's happening now, if you don't look at the past and the powers that controlled, in the past, and still control it today. They're still in charge of which books you'll read, in various areas, especially in schools, the give us our history, their main members write the history books, always did; and this is what Carroll Quigley was talking about here and he's trying to defend them. He says:
This picture is called terrifying ... because such power, whatever the goals at which it may be directed, is too much to be entrusted safely to any group.
Now, they were non-democratic, in fact they were very secretive, the public didn't even know they existed, all through this period.
That it was too much to be safely entrusted to the Milner Group will appear quite clearly in Chapter 12. No country that values its safety should allow what the Milner Group accomplished in Britain — that is, that a small number of men should be able to wield such power in administration and politics, should be given almost complete control over the publication of the documents relating to their actions,
Their own members wrote their histories.
should be able to exercise such influence over the avenues of information
They controlled all information.
that create public opinion,
How can you come to a rational conclusion and make a decision on something, if you can't get all the facts? And, of course, the omission of facts will make you pro-war / anti-war, depending on where it's trying to point you, which they did by the way, and that's in the book as well.
and should be able to monopolize so completely the writing and the teaching of the history of their own period.
To monopolize so completely, that means pretty well all of it.
the writing and the teaching of the history of their own period.
Now, remember, I said that, in Chatham House, how come that became the headquarters of the OSS? The OSS branched off into MI6 and the CIA. It's the same group; in fact, if you read these books, you’ll find the same names were operatives within the CIA, MI6 and the Council on Foreign Relations and Royal Institute of International Affairs; all the same players were also agents, along with their funders, the bankers. It's astonishing. You know, even Winston Churchill hadn't a clue that they existed and what kind of power that they had; and he brought it up in Parliament. Because, the group you see, had a manifesto, from the 1800s, where they wanted to rebuild the entire planet and create these big / massive trading blocs but under a world government and a new system of living, a new way of living.
You also get the hints of sustainability in there as well, remember, the bankers were on board; in the 1800s. Their idea was, first of all, to create, they already had the British Empire, and this empire was to blossom into a world empire that would be camouflaged. They would give certain countries freedom first, but only when they had set up the same structure of supposed phoney democracy in those countries, would they withdraw, because they'd have recruitment members within those countries, belonging to the same association, to direct it in the same path as they were going back in Britain. That's what we're doing in Iraq right now, the setting up of the puppet government, training a generation that'll go into various fraternities, certain ones will get picked and chosen and they'll really run the country, not the elected officials. This is the trick they used down through the last hundred years. And, Churchill didn't know why these people had advocated and were promoting that India be given its freedom, which was fair and dandy, if they were actually given their freedom but they weren't, not the way they thought and Churchill said in Parliament, Churchill says this:
I've watched this story from its very unfolding and what has struck me more than anything else about it
This is on page 222, The Anglo-American Establishment.
has been the amazingly small number of people who have managed to carry matters to their present lamentable pitch. You could almost count them on the fingers of one hand. I have also been struck by the prodigious power which this group of individuals have been able to exert and relay, to use a mechanical term, through the vast machinery of party,
That's political parties.
Because they had their men in all the top positions in Parliament.
and of patronage, both here and in the East. It is tragical that they should have been able to mislead the loyalties and use the assets of the Empire to its own undoing.
They were using the system, and the financing of the British Empire to undo, from Churchill's view what the Empire was, yet he didn't know the rest of the story, as I say, setting up these little cloned units of a new type of society, but inserting a secret society within those left behind, to run the countries; and they used the taxpayers' money to do it. They're still using the taxpayers' money to do it. He says:
I compliment them on their skill, and I compliment them also on their disciples.
That's what they're called, they are called disciples, they're incredibly idealistic, the ones they recruit right out of Oxford and Cambridge and so on, in the States too, at Princeton etc.
Their chorus is exceedingly well drilled." This statement was answered by Lord Eustace Percy, who quoted Lord Hugh Cecil on "profitable mendacity." This led to an argument, in which both sides appealed to the Speaker.
Order was restored and so on. He says:
It is quite clear that Churchill believed his charge and was referring to what we have called the Milner Group, although he would not have known it under that name,
It was so secretive and the groups behind the CFR are still so secretive, because they have ‘circles’, they call them circles, the fraternities, there's the lower circles and then there's the higher circles and then there's the inner chambers. Each circle works towards a world system. At the bottom, they're all idealistic about it. The ones in between the middle, play on the higher powers, they work on all media, run all media. They decide what textbooks you'll read, what will be in the textbooks, in fact, their guys write the textbooks and that shapes your thought. However, the ones at the top, are still very secretive and they use technocrats, that's also in the book, like the Kissingers and so on that run across the planet, who are always behind the scenes, with more power than presidents, because they don't have to answer to the general public, on anything and they know; and, he says it in the book here, that the Technocrat knows he wields the true power, he can get things done. Exactly the same as Margaret Thatcher talked about, when she joined it. The parallel government, as she called it.
Here you have an organisation that uses sciences to rule the people, they use the Bernays-type techniques, to create public opinion. They rule the media, in the book, he goes so far as to show you how they terrified the British people, on purpose, to get them pro-war with Germany and how they, their members, the RIIA's members, who ruled the newspapers, they had a meeting and says how can we scare the bejesus out of the British public and get them on board. So, they got the king, they asked the king to give a talk openly about the necessity for digging trenches all around London, trenches, as they knew was laughable, they'd be useless in an air raid, but it would get them all thinking 'it was coming, 'it was coming'. Then all their same media boys, their barons, wrote the same story, all lies, and Quigley said that, because he's reading from the records as to how they did it; and, they told the British public they were going to be gassed at any time, that Hitler had massive amounts of gas and they would spray it from the skies and they were all going to die. Just to make sure, just to augment it, to make it seem more realistic, they got the government to issue millions of gas masks; and, they had Pathe News coming on, in the cinemas, telling them “carry it with you at all times, you're going to get gassed”. And the Germans had no intention of doing that and the Intelligence of Britain knew that the Germans didn't have the gasses to do it.
That's the length that this organisation, the same organisation that's out in the open today, advising governments on policies. The same organisation that admits that they were the ones who drafted up the lines for Ireland - the border. They drafted up the ones for Iraq and Iran and Pakistan and India. They bypassed all governments, they were the guys behind it; and, they take credit, in their own writings, for doing this; and, none of them are elected or answerable to any public anywhere for their actions. These are the guys who, basically, became the CIA and MI6; these are the guys, in the previous talks I've given about the Cultural Cold Wars, that had all these front groups working and the right-wing people were blaming far-left Communists for what was happening. Meanwhile, it was they themselves that were doing all this, to change the whole course of society. These are the guys that put degenerate art out, the nihilistic stuff, in a sort of psychological drama, to create a form of apathy. Remember what Bertrand Russell says: "You must create apathy to control people".
Meanwhile, every other group is fighting every other group, all their opposite groups, and this bunch are behind the scenes doing all of this; and, they're also writing your textbooks, they’re writing your news stories for you, they're writing the magazines for you; they're creating your whole reality. They came out openly, on Canadian television, and admitted they were the ones that drafted up these negotiations, these amalgamations, basically these steps into amalgamation for Canada, the US and Mexico. Who elected these people to do this? What makes governments listen to them? Are the governments told to listen to them by a higher power somewhere?
As I say: you have to understand the past, to understand the present, because they're more powerful than ever, because now, through the Rhodes scholarship, they have their men in every government across the planet. They concentrate upon the bureaucracies, because, through the bureaucracies, which are there regardless of parties moving in and out, the bureaucracies have their mandates and they bypass the politicians often, have done, since the League of Nations and they can obviously converse with their opposite parties in some other country, the opposite bureaucracies. H.G. Wells talked about that, a long time ago. Look at the funders who are in on this, people like the Astors; now you know who set up the Fabian Society and many more of the same ilk, it was the same organisation, using all these fronts. They run right wing fronts, left wing fronts, they direct and fund all the social-engineering studies in all universities, for the next generation of experts to rule over us and tell us what to do and what to wear and how to behave, or not behave, or whatever else it may be. It makes me think of Bernays again. Now, Bernays did not dream up the art of mass manipulation and the effects of propaganda. He wrote a book called Propaganda. In the first lines of the book, it says:
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country.
He wrote that in 1928, and he's on board with this team. And we think we're coming to our own conclusions? As I say, it's very similar to the riots going on right now that the media's making sure you know about. I'm sure all the talk shows are going on about well there's a new revolution coming and where will it go, will the youth throw off all the shackles etc. Look at what the youth have been taught before this: the greening system, do the youth rebel when they're walking through all the checkpoints in school? No. So, they’ll accept that kind of society. If they claim it's going to be peace for all, they'll go for that. They'll also push for the new economic system, which is exactly what the boys who control the present economic system want, because it's the same boys that run the CFR.
I always say with revolutions, watch who leads you; watch who leads you, watch where they'll take you, because it's precisely where they want you to go. They want to bring in a new system and they will use words like 'justice for all' and 'equality' - all the usual idealistic-sounding terms, but they won't elaborate on the true meanings of them, they won't break them down for you, who's more equal than others, who will be ruling you, there's got to be a structure set up, of government of some kind. Or, will the answer be well no one can be trusted to rule their own life in peace; therefore, you all have to be watched, so it's only fair we all allow ourselves to be watched 24 hours a day.
Where did they get into this ideal world, how far back does it go? It goes back into the 1800s, actually long before, long before that. In Anglo-American Establishment, he says:
From this point onward (early 1938), the Milner Group
That's part of the Royal Institute of International Affairs.
increasingly emphasized the necessity for building up this Oceanic bloc.
It was their idea to build up the blocs and, in fact, they were all for Hitler, initially, 'the great experiment' they called it, because Hitler's ideals were the same as theirs they said, because he wanted a united Europe.
In England the basic propaganda work
was done through The Round Table and Lionel Curtis, while in the United States it was done through the Rhodes Scholarship organization,
That's the Foundation, the one that Bill Clinton was sent off to and many more.
especially through Clarence Streit and Frank Aydelotte. In England, Curtis wrote a series of books
Here's what they did to manipulate the minds, remember they said a book is a fantastic tool, now it's TV and so on, a movie can do it.
and articles advocating a new federal organization built around the English-speaking countries.
Initially, and then it was to go on to global.
The chief work of this nature was his Civitas Dei, which appeared in three volumes in 1934-1937. A one volume edition was issued in 1938, with the title The Commonwealth of God.
He called it, the Commonwealth of God; and, that's an expansion of the Commonwealth of Nations. Back with more - after this break.
=== BREAK ===
Hi folks, I am Alan Watt and we're Cutting Through The Matrix, trying to get to the bottom of things; and, it's a murky dark bottom indeed, very-very deep. What Professor Quigley's giving us here, is how they write history, with spin, a spin to grab the youth, to make them idealistic and bring them to the only conclusion that's left at the end of a book. Here's how it's done, it says here, Curtis was writing one, they wrote many-many books, all the major books actually were written by their members. It says:
By a superficial and frequently erroneous rewriting
of world history,
the author sought to review the evolution of the "commonwealth" idea and to show that all of history leads to its fulfilment and achievement in federation. Ultimately, this federation will be worldwide,
It's a World Federation, they own the World Federal Society, by the way, that's one of their organisations.
but en route it must pass through stages, of which the chief is federation of the English-speaking peoples. Writing early in 1937, he advocated that the League of Nations be destroyed
Now, they set up the League of Nations, these boys, but now it had fulfilled its purpose and they had to get onto the next stage. The builders always do, they build a building and when it's fulfilled its purpose, they demolish it and bring another one up. It says:
the League of Nations be destroyed by the mass resignation of the British democracies. These should then take the initiative in forming a new league, also at Geneva, which would have no power to enforce anything but would merely form a kind of international conference.
That's the United Nations.
Since it would be foolish to expect any federation to evolve from any such organization as this, a parallel, but quite separate, effort should be made to create an international commonwealth, based on the example of the United States in 1788.
Now, remember what Benjamin Franklin once said, in his own memoirs, if you read them, that he hoped - and many of the founders hoped - that this federation of the United States would be the nucleus, the beginning of a world federation. He says:
This international commonwealth would differ from the League of Nations in that its members would yield up part of their sovereignty, and the central organization would function directly on individuals and not merely on states. This international commonwealth would be formed, at first, only of those states that have evolved furthest in the direction of obtaining a commonwealth form of government for themselves.
They wanted a cloned democratic system put up there, even though they would really run them, behind the scenes, as they were already doing.
It will be recalled that this restriction on membership was what Curtis had originally advocated for the League of Nations in The Round Table of December 1918.
That's when they put forward the setting up of the League of Nations.
According to Curtis, the movement toward the Commonwealth of God can begin by the union of any two national commonwealths, no matter how small. He suggested New Zealand and Australia, or these two and Great Britain. Then the international commonwealth could be expanded to include India, Egypt,
That's happened you see.
Holland, Belgium, Scandinavia, France, Canada, the United States, and Ireland.
What you're seeing now that they've set up the amalgamated Europe, they want the American amalgamation to now amalgamate with Europe, exactly along these lines. This was written a long time ago, by those who pulled it off. I'll be back with more tomorrow.
So, from Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it's goodnight. May you god (or your gods), go with you.
Transcribed by Bill Scott.
Book Excerpts: [Continued] "Tragedy and Hope" and "The Anglo-American Establishment" by Carroll Quigley.
Article: "New age of rebellion and riot stalks Europe" by Roger Boyes (timesonline.co.uk) - Jan. 22, 2009.)