June 17, 2013 (#1354)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt June 17, 2013:

Prophets of Profit Rely on the Sly:

"Who Stole Reality, Substituting Servile Compliance?
It Accelerated with Pavlov, then Armies within Science,
The Media is the Message, Trains You to Technique,
Disabling Critical Thinking, Obscuring what You Seek,
Your Battle May Leave You Battered, Dishevelled,
Yet Perseverance Shows Reality is Many-Levelled,
The Prole at the Bottom gets His from Twitter or TV,
Children of Elite get "Daddy Talk" when They're Wee,
Well-Paid Professors get Stints in Institutions
Trained to Present Agendas in Psychological Convolutions,
Lots of Fear Promoted "You're All Going to Die"
'less You Leave it to the Experts, Proficient in the Lie"
© Alan Watt June 17, 2013

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - June 17, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)


cuttingthroughthematrix.com
alternate sites:
cuttingthroughthematrix.net  ,   .us  ,   .ca
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca

mirror site:
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu


Information for purchasing Alanís books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check Ė in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

PayPal Orders: USE THE DONATE BUTTON ON THE WEBSITE Ė AND Ė
Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on June 17, 2013.  For newcomers, please help yourself to the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. Youíll find lots and lots of audios for free download; youíll find transcripts as well for print-up of lots of the talks Iíve given over the years. Remember too that you bring me to you. I donít bring on advertisers as guests. I donít sell stacks of products to make you live for eternity. I just give you the reality, reality as it is, because weíre living at the bottom level of reality Ė at least weíre trained to live in it actually.  Some break through, most donít. But regardless, we truly are in an advanced system. Itís very, very unique in a sense. Itís been on the go for a long time.  And weíre trained into it, to believe that everything that exists is just quite normal and natural, and everything weíre told by the media and so on is absolutely true, and politicians come out of special wombs and suffer all night worrying about us and how to help us out.  So help yourself remember to the website and you can help me out too by getting the books I have and the discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.

 

It will help you to wake up too, as I go through the history of this system and the boys that brought it all together, an awful long time ago, and how itís accelerating actually; itís getting better and better all the time with the neuroscientists and behaviorists all involved working for government agencies, etc., and all the media.  Because everything that you get is really censored, and not only censored too, itís all approved that you get the news that youíre getting, the way itís presented to you. And youíre limited in your thought. Youíre limited in your access to truth. This is the Big Brother system that Orwell did talk about.  So if you want to order the books and discs you can [Order and donation options listed above.]. 

 

And because inflation is going rampant, thatís because weíre going into austerity you understand, and weíre going into carbon taxing and a whole bunch of things, weíre going into a post-consumer society they say, where all your extra money will go to power companies and energy bills and so on and taxes. Thatís how theyíre bringing you into austerity. Itís all planned and it was a long time ago; the Club of Rome talked about it in the 1970s, the big think tank for the United Nations. So everything is according to plan, because we work through a big business plan that takes in accounts of centuries, and they plan the next century and the next century and the next century. Itís quite simple. Itís not difficult at all. All big businesses actually work this way, the international corporations, and the world is one big business.  And believe you me, you are the business. So as I say, you can buy the books and discs etc. and hopefully I can tick along a bit more, because straight donations are really seriously welcome.

 

Now, itís hard to get through most folkís minds, especially folk who really are stuck in their mainstream television or radio, because they truly are incredibly indoctrinated to an extent they will never ever break out of it, most of them will never break out of it. They get up in the mornings, a lot of people, they listen to the DJs prattling on, at hyperspeed as they drive to their work, all in a neurotic fashion. Thatís all there by design too, by the way. And they think thatís normal as they hype you up getting you ready for the day, and then they get their head filled with little incidents that happen in their cities, what do you think about this, what do you take, this side or that side? And every day their head is full of someone elseís thoughts, all put out there to keep them busy, occupied, but never to make them ask anything about a higher truth on anything at all. In other words, never think, really, for yourself. Never you pick a topic and puzzle over it; allow yourself to have all the topics picked for you. Itís quite simple.

 

If you go into the writings of even the Rockefeller Brothers and their institutes and so on, a long time ago, they talked about training the public through education, etc. in a certain scientific way, that they would come to them eventually with perfect docility as adults. And that has happened. Very old techniques and theyíve all been applied. Back with more after this.

 

Hi folks, Iím back. Weíre back on the airÖ there were some audio problems there. Getting back to reality and so on, how many folk really know what reality is?† Most folk literally think if they can talk to their peer group, who are all listening to the same mainstream stuff and so on, and they can parrot it to each other, thatís reality.  Itís quite simple. You could have a lot of mad folk, actually.  And Bertrand Russell went over this technique.  He said, we can train folk actually to believe all the same things and convince them that snow is actually black, as opposed to people around them who will be taught that snow is white. And thatís how simple it was. And this was talked about a long, long, long time ago by guys who worked on international councils to bring in this world society. Not any old world society, but a conquered society, really, where the public would not know they were conquered. They would be producers and consumers and taxpayers, and very obedient, and those at the top above them would be the massive bureaucracies and academic councils as well, training the managerial class to keep it all going, on behalf of the Masters who are the international corporate boys, the bosses, CEOs and so on. Thatís all actually happened.

 

So weíre living in a very artificial system. Itís completely artificial actually. And itís not free... nothing is free... Thereís no such thing as free information or even getting to the basic truth of anything. Itís very difficult to get a hold of anything thatís happening, because people do scheme at the top. Theyíre always scheming, the different plans they have and agendas.  They have world meetings where they put all these schemes together, and then they have think tanks that must figure out how to implement all these schemes on the public without the public ever becoming aware of whatís actually going on. And itís their right to do so, they believe at the top, because they have proven through generations of basically inbreeding, proper breeding they say, selecting their partners properly, with wealth involved, and keeping generations in the same lines of business, banking or whatever it happens to be. In other words, they donít drop off and become drunks and they donít go off to be artists and so on; they are the same as their dads and mums were before them. This is how they justify themselves as being the top of the evolved species. They all get together as I say in their world clubs, all throughout the year too.  Itís not just at the Bilderberg meeting and so on, itís all throughout the year. They meet with their second-in-commands that run all the think tanks and they get filled in on how itís all getting implemented.

 

Government is in total collusion with it because if you go into the archives section at cuttingthroughthematrix.com youíll find lots of talks Iíve given over the Royal Institute of International Affairs, a private organization, that has organizations all through bureaucracies and governments, through the whole planet.  In America they call it the Council on Foreign Relations because ĎRoyalí Institute doesnít go down too well inside America, you see. They run the media. They run entertainment. They run pretty well everything that you think is your reality. They decide what is going to be news and whatís never going to be heard of as news for the general population. So youíre not living in a free society at all.

 

Of course the boys at the top have many, many reasons, because thereís self-deceptionÖ You always find with psychopaths at the top, in any group actually, thereís a lot of self-deception involved. I mean, they donít come out and say theyíre bad; if you ever got them red-handed on something theyíll never, ever admit theyíre bad. Theyíve always got a good reason for doing what they do, you see. Thatís how they rationalize things to themselves. And they believe theyíre bringing in this world, which will be a more peaceful world, everyone will know what theyíre born for because youíll be told what youíre going to do from an early age onwards, school to work, etc. So they brought the communist version, the Marxist type concept together with the Western idea of capitalism and blended the two together.

 

Now, that also came out in the Reece Commission back in the 1950s when the U.S. Congress had inquiries done into the tax-free, exempt foundations, the big foundations; the Rockefeller, Carnegie, Guggenheim, all the big boys, Ford. Because they were wanting to know why they were funding, these richest men in the US actually, were funding communist organizations.  One of them told Norman Dodd, who was part of it Ė and Norman Dodd wrote a book on it too; and another book is called Foundations: Their Power and Influence; itís well worth reading if you can get through it.  He was told by the head of the Ford Foundation that all their orders came from the White House and their job was to work with the Soviet system and eventually blend it, culturally and every other way, with that of the West, gradually, in a seamless fashion, until it became communized within the States, the US, socialized, and the public wouldnít even see it coming.  So this is an old agenda. Itís happened.

 

You can go back further, youíll find Bertrand Russell talking about it. He worked with all these different groups on bringing in the new systems by altering the cultures. He also worked with the Frankfurt school on occasion. The Frankfurt school also was sent over from Germany, actually they fled from Germany, to continue it in the West, and they did a really big job on it, a good job you might say because they were awfully successful in altering the culture and helping destroying the old cultures, which really, they saw as enemies to themselves, the guys within the Frankfurt school.  So youíve got to understand, youíre always being altered, your minds are being given your new premises to think about. Youíre given them by experts. Youíre generally given two opposing views, initially, and then the experts come on and then they argue, because itís all prearranged, they argue until one of them obviously makes more sense than the other, and thatís the one that you adopt. Itís an old technique. Itís very simple. It works every time, on most people.

 

Again too, youíve got to bring in a very naÔve population.  Bring them up and keep them naÔve because naÔve people are taught not to really question anything.  Why should you? I mean, you understand youíre living in a predatory society, with winners and losers, but they donít want you to know that, you understand.  Youíre not to know that. Youíre supposed to think itís all fair and nice and good and people above you really have your best interests at heart. Like a vocation, a vocation used to mean thatÖ Even people would go into medicine at one time for vocations, not for the money Ė that was a long time ago, that, of course, naturally Ė because they wanted to help people and so on. And other folk did the same kind of things in other fields as well. And youíre taught that the politicians are somehow like that.  Thereís nothing further from the truth.

 

Because politicians, when you go through their histories, they are literally marked off from a very early age most of them.  They try to get into local councils; they go to lots of charity works because thatís how youíre supposed to start. Youíll find that every charity group that you join, they sit and eat cakes and have coffee at every meeting Ė thatís all they do Ė and listen to some old guy at the end of the table whoís the boss. And his job is to select the ones heíll take off to the golf course and then bump up the ladder to the next council. And they gradually work their way up. In other words, the ones who understand the con, and the ones who will keep their mouth shut, and who are not so naÔve, are the ones who get put up, for their own self benefit.  Itís all well understood. Thatís how it works. Theyíll play the party line as well.  And they become the politicians. Also when you check their records often, theyíve had so many bankruptcies and scandals in their past, itís astronomical, way more than the general public, because they have psychopathic traits, they have many more psychopathic traits on the psychopathic scale.

 

So theyíre all used, understand, and theyíre happy to be used, the psychopaths, because they get well rewarded for pleasing their bosses, which really is a private system above them. A private system, thatís so important to understand. Youíre living in the age where the private systems run everything. Even the private clubs that run them, like the Royal Institute of International Affairs, it sounds very pompous, very official, but itís a private organization that goes way back into the 1800s when there was two groups that got together, the Milner group, Lord Alfred Milner for the bankers, and the Cecil Rhodes Foundation and Lord Rothschild, got together and formed the Royal Institute of International Affairs.  They wrote about bringing on world wars in order to financially defeat the countries, bring them to their knees, and get them to accept bringing blocks of countries together, like the European Union which was one of their goals and they got what they wanted. They boasted about needing to do this, and willing to do it, to get their aims done.  They talked about doing the same thing with the Far-Eastern/Pacific region; theyíve done it. And theyíve talked about bringing the Americas under one as well; itís rampaging ahead, when you look at all the different BRIC countries and so on; believe you me, the BRIC countries joined with the NAFTA countries because theyíre all under the same World Banks and so on.

 

So everything is going to plan and they plan to bring in this brave new world system where experts run your lives from birth to death. Theyíve already brought in the GIRFEC program in some countries like Scotland where every child is tested, from the age of two months, psychologically, and itís to go on through your whole life, as they update you, and rectify you if youíve got any wrong-think, or maybe self-think.   Goodness knows, you might have self-think; you might actually think for yourselves. And weíre really rampaging ahead at a tremendous speed towards this particular goal.

 

Most folk donít mind it. I listened to, it was a CBC radio program last night.  They used to call it the Communist Broadcasting Corporation of Canada. Even Yuri Bezmenov the KGB agent who came over to Canada and then ended up working there, he said he met more communists in there than he did in the Soviet Union. But anyway, it hasnít changed. And they have a fantastic presentation, they keep you thinking youíre living in a little world, Canada; thatís their whole technique. And very, very pleasant announcers and so on, always cheery, and they can be kind of colloquial too in their speech, etc., when need be. They keep you existing on little things that happen inside Canada and little personal stories and itís all very nicey-nicey.  Then they go onto the topic of personal privacy, do you really need it or not, etc. And they have their call-ins. Mind you too, youíve got to watch too, because you donít know how many are prearranged or not. Youíd be surprised how many organizations are set up in Canada, special interest groups, who monitor the radio full time; some of them occasionally admit it. And any particular topic comes up and they jump right in with the proper spiel to give to the public on pretty well whatever topic it is. So anyway, youíll find that some of them, and sure enough, there was about three people who phoned in and says, oh well Iím a good person, Iíve nothing to hide, I donít mind.

 

And apparently itís getting worse and worse with the young people whoíve taken it as granted, the Internet has been there since they were born some of them, and they think itís all quite natural that government should know all about you. They have no concept of privacy whatsoever. They have no concept of life, because theyíre young, or history whatsoever. And theyíre trusting. They also think theyíll get something out of it, so itís okay and worthwhile to give all your data away. Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about reality, something most folk donít know anything about, because they donít get any of it. They have no idea theyíve been kept in the dark about most things. They donít know that thereís a whole culture, which they participate in, which is created for them to be in, at a low level, and thatís low-level culture. And thereís different levels above them, all to do with who is in a-little-bit-of-the-know, and more-know, and know, and those at the top of course who know everything thatís going on. Because they meet at international meetings across the world and they plan the future and their investments, and they plan how many millions or billions theyíre going to demand from government to finance their big projects, which theyíre given for free and then they end up taxing you for it all and charging you for roads and power and everything else. Because thatís the real world, CEOs run the world.

 

Again, thatís what Carroll Quigley who was the historian for the Royal Institute of International Affairs said. He said that they have their own private archives, their own private version of history, since theyíve been behind most of it Ė he said that too. Theyíve been behind most big changes in history, in the past, over a hundred years, he says, theyíve been the ones behind it. So they have their own private archives of history, what they have done. I mean, thatís quite a boast to have, isnít it?  Of course too, all the top members of the media are all members of it too, so of course theyíre not going to tell you. Youíre kept in a bubble.

 

But this ties in with this article here too, and they start off with the Prism surveillance scandal Ė this is from The Mail & Guardian, it says here. It saysÖ

 

George Orwell back in fashion as Prism stokes Big Brother paranoia

mg.co.za / 12 Jun 2013 / Stephen Moss

 

The NSA Prism surveillance scandal has been good news for George Orwell, and in particular for his dystopian novel Nineteen Eighty-Four, which was originally published in 1949. (Alan:  I think it was 1948 actually. And the name he had on it was, The Last Man, but it was his publisher that changed it.) Sales of the centennial edition have risen by more than 7 000% on Amazon.com. Having been languishing at 13,074 in the list, it is now up to 193 and rising.

 

It may not rival Caroline Barnett's Willing to Walk on Water: Step Out in Faith and Let God Work Miracles through Your Life, which has miraculously surged from 144th to first in the past 24 hours with a 267 000% rise, but clearly many people are finding parallels between the US government's willingness to snoop on Joe Public's emails and phone calls and Orwell's vision of a future in which Big Brother is everywhere. 

 

(A:  Now, the reason George Orwell knew this Ė or, Blair as his name was Ė it was because he was great pals with Aldous Huxley. Huxley at one point had been a mentor of his at college. And they, for the rest of their lives shared letters on how this totalitarian system would be brought in, because they all knew, they both knew it was going to happen. There was no doubt about that at all. Because they both mixed with the upper crust, you see, and Huxley especially, coming from his lineage, he was well in on world meetings etc. His brother Julian was well in too, with many of the big organizations that were going in for family planning, depopulation and redistribution of the peopleís wealth and so on, all this stuff. So they knew what was going on and they knew that the techniques were already achieved. You have to understand too, the techniques had already been working to bring inÖ they were already set up I should say, to bring in the Soviet system, how to bring in a new culture. It wasnít a hit-and-miss thing once they got started and took over. They went right to work at the school level and there were techniques they used to brainwash the general population into this new system, very, very quickly too, and it worked very, very well. So they knew it would be brought up and it would be perfected. They also had all the Freudian schools, that came out actually to change society Ė there was a big purpose behind that and a particular group behind that too Ė to change society using psychiatric terminology and methodology to change society as well, and long before World War II. So itís very important you understand what these guys knew. They knew the techniques that would be used on the general public and have been used since then.† And it says here...)

 

. . . the US government's willingness to snoop on Joe Public's emails and phone calls and Orwell's vision of a future in which Big Brother is everywhere. 

 

"Orwellian" is the word on everyone's lips. "The question is, what do freedom and liberty mean in the United States of America?" Senator Bernie Sanders asked in a TV interview this week. "What does our Constitution mean? (A:  See, it isnít just what the things mean; what do you THINK it means? See, thatís important, what you think it means. And if you say the answer and youíre probably certain youíre right too, if you have someone up top, some top judge, heíll give you a completely different version of it. If you talk to someone, a CEO of an international corporation, heíll give you another version of it.) What kind of country do we want to be? Children will grow up knowing that every damn thing that they do is going to be recorded somewhere in a file, and I think that will have a very Orwellian and inhibiting impact on our lives."

 

Not, it must be said, that Orwell really needs the publicity. Like Big Brother, he is always with us. DJ Taylor, who in 2003 wrote a biography of Orwell and for the past five years has been chairperson of the Orwell Trust, makes a startling claim for the writer: "If you had to write down the names of the three writers in English who had had the greatest effect in communicating to the general public what books and literature were about," he says, "they would be Shakespeare, Dickens and Orwell."

 

The US has always been keen on Orwell: liberals warmed to him because of his warnings against the power of the state, conservatives because his books gave them a stick with which to beat communism. His influence has also been felt outside the English-speaking world. Editions of Ninety Eighty-Four and Animal Farm, published in 1945, circulated in the Soviet Union; he was Ė and indeed still is Ė revered in Poland, where his satires were widely read under communist rule; and Taylor believes he is being read in China today. Orwell has something to say to everyone who is suffering under autocracy.  (A:  And Iíll read some more of this when I get back after this break.)

 

Hi folks, Iím Alan Watt.  Weíre Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about George Orwell. This article goes on to sayÖ

 

Insidious threats to liberty

However, readers who pick up Nineteen Eighty-Four because of the current worries over the Prism programme would be wrong just to see it as a novel about the dangers of overweening technology. The all-seeing telescreen in the corner of the room is an important device for allowing the state to exercise control (A:  ...because it sees both ways, you see, just like youíre buying ones now that do the same thing.), but Orwell's real concern is about far more insidious threats to liberty. The Big Brother state aims at nothing less than the control of language and thought. (A:  Well, youíve had, what, 20 to 30 years of rap, down to the bottom. How far down can you go? Youíve hit the bottom, you see. Itís called LINGUISTIC MINIMALISM, and when you donít have the words to put together to communicate your ideas and thoughts, especially abstract thoughts of justice, right and wrong and so on, you canít communicate, so thereís no rebellion Ė that was part of the novel.) According to the slogans repeated by the ministry of truth, (A:  ...and you could say George Bush and then ObamaÖ) "War is Peace (A:  ...you see, theyíre going to war to bring peace, you see, across the world. Theyíre forcing democracy, that no one wants over there, because they watch the stuff that we think is democracy here.), Freedom is Slavery, Ignorance is Strength." Deprive people of the words with which to resist, and you will crush resistance.

 

In Nineteen Eighty-Four, Winston Smith's defining act of rebellion is to keep a diary, to attempt to record his thoughts and feelings accurately Ė not easy when the expressions you need have been obliterated or perverted. The greatest inhibition, to use Senator Sanders's word, is mental rather than physical.

 

The idea that governments could control people's minds terrified Orwell. Taylor argues that Nineteen Eighty-Four was born of paranoia Ė a paranoia that was apparent from the beginning of Orwell's writing career in the early 1930s. He lionised the writer as a free individual striving for objective truth, beholden to no special interests, yet everywhere he saw that freedom being circumscribed.  (A:  And he was quite right, because Orwell also knew that the Bertrand Russells and others and all these private organizations, WELL funded by international groups, were on the path of bringing in this world society. Because these groups, you see, realized, or they believed that they realized, that the world couldnít go on the way it was, and eventually the masses might rebel, down the road, against all the big plans the big boys had, like joining countries together and things like that and using their tax money for their big private business projects and so on. So they were getting together to find ways of keeping the public very ignorant and stupid, and in fear, by having wars or threat of wars constantly, or financial collapses, things like that.  Always in fear, to make them just be obedient to government and so on. So Orwell had a good reason for knowing what was going on, plus he read all the articles and books by the scientists too, that were putting out the stuff about the Soviet system for the new Soviet man.  They were going to create the new Soviet man, total indoctrination from birth right through their whole life. And of course the Nazis picked up on that too, they actually copied it; why invent it when it had already been done well in Russia. So he had a reason for being, he wasnít just paranoid; he was quite rational about it.)   . . . He lionised the writer as a free individual striving for objective truth.... (A:  And so on. And it says...)

 

Orwell encapsulated those fears in his 1946 essay "The Prevention of Literature". "In our age," he wrote, "the idea of intellectual liberty is under attack from two directions. On the one side are its theoretical enemies, the apologists of totalitarianism, and on the other its immediate, practical enemies, monopoly and bureaucracy Ö Everything conspires to turn the writer, and every other kind of artist as well, into a minor official, working on themes handed to him from above and never telling what seems to him the whole truth." 

 

(A:  Now, Iíve mentioned before that every country now has a Department of Culture. You should ask yourselves, why, if you are the culture, does your government have to have a Department of Culture? You see, they decide what culture is going to be as they change it and update it. Thatís why. And they give out massive grants every year, Canada is a good example and Britain too, for novelists, for example, to write politically correct updates, for whatever it is, sustainability, whatever it is, into their books, and they get grants for doing this. So what theyíre saying here Orwell already knew was coming, and itís here today.)

 

It is Orwell's paranoia that gives his writing its power and urgency, and which has kept it alive. What we might learn from a broader understanding of that much-used (and sometimes abused) term "Orwellian" is that he would fear not only the technology of surveillance but our response to it. Are we willing to question its use? Will we demand greater oversight of the work of the security agencies? Will we hold our government to account? As long as there is a Winston Smith struggling to keep his diary, Big Brother has not won.

 

So for those who donít know about George Orwell they should really read into it too. There are some good movies put out too. One of them had Richard Burton in it and itís a really excellent one done in Britain. Itís well worth watching because thereís so much, so much to learn in it too. And you can relate it to the present day as well.

 

The cons that go on today too, are collusions of course with big international corporations and governments. They used to call it fascism of course. We donít have statesmen today. Statesmen were people who were often from older families that had some kind of old sense of the system, and their duty to it basically, who would come out and stand up for things, which may even hurt them financially but they would do the right thing. They donít exist anymore. The statesmen also were the ones who stuck to the laws. If you donít go by the laws your country had, it doesnít matter if theyíre right or wrong or you donít like them, if youíre not going by the laws youíre living in a lawless society. And unfortunately we are today as the big boys keep changing things, or bending them, and theyíve got all these banks of lawyers who are masters at reinterpreting whatís very obvious and has been for centuries. This is how cunning things are today. Thereís a lot of cunningness involved.

 

But we find things like the cervical cancer vaccine, a lot of people have had terrible reactions; a lot of young girls have died and so on.  Iím going to put a few articles up tonight about it because itís only one of many things as we become an outlet for massive profit by mandating this kind of stuff. When your government mandates that you must take everything that Pharma comes up with, and of course your governmentís buying the stuff as well, like flu shots which never work and can make you pretty ill too, and kill some people as well.  When they mandate that you must use this stuff, and theyíve given a contract to a private corporation, youíre in trouble; youíve got fascism there.  If your government said youíve all to have gardens, but if youíve got a garden youíve got to use this spade made by this so-and-so, what would you say about it? Hmm? Well, itís the same thing when they say the same thing, you must get this flu shot, made by whomever it happens to be that year; they have ten-year contracts for some of them.  Big, big business. 

 

But we accept it. Most folk accept it because they really are brainwashed, and that youíre living in a good society, and greed has nothing to do with it whatsoever of course, and so on. Well...

 

Health ministry withdraws recommendation for cervical cancer vaccine

ajw.asahi.com / June 15, 2013

 

(A:  And this is to do for Japan and some Asian countries.)

 

The health ministry decided June 14 to withdraw its recommendation for a vaccination to protect girls against cervical cancer after hundreds complained about possible side effects, including long-term pain and numbness.  (A:  And some of the girls have had strokes, right, from previous articles.)

 

The Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare is not suspending the use of the vaccination, but it has instructed local governments not to promote the use of the medicine while studies are conducted on the matter.

 

But Iíve also got another one here too, and Iíve mentioned this article many times, because it came out in 2007 I think, by the woman who led the research team for the two first ones that came out that are still used today. She was on the board. She worked for them. She said itís no use whatsoever... absolutely no use whatsoever. It might even be dangerous, but she says, it will have no use in preventing anything. And yet itís beenÖ Look at the massive...  Again, the marketing overtakes reality, doesnít it? And theyíre pumping in the millions of course. So Iíll put that one up tonight as well.

 

The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can "Sleep At Night": Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested - healthwyze.org

 

Thatís what we live in; we live in cons, massive cons. Itís the same with the sustainability. You understand, the whole sustainability thing, the global warming thing, itís all to do with massive control by the few at the top. This is what itís for. Theyíve banked everything on it. Every CEO of every international corporation in the world, thatís all on board with this thing, has got everything to gain, and believe you me, theyíll have a lot to lose if they canít get all this through. This is to plan a new society and to brainwash every child into a completely new way of living. I went through the articles before, years ago, when Gorbachev was sent over to set up his own organization with them too.  He said in his own book, I am a communist, he says.  He says, I am an atheist as well.  He said, Iím going socialist now Ė which is just the term they use over here, liberal, socialist, the same thing. He said, Iím an atheist but we are writing a book and in the book weíve got the need, the method and the need to bring in this new system of a form, a form of earth worship must be created, he says, a form of earth worship taught to the children. Hereís an atheist talking about creating a religion for the West. And itís all here, brainwashing through the schools of course, because this is to guide you through your life.  And sustainability, meaning massive profits for corporations who will tax you to the hilt, and everything that you need to live, basic, basic things, will go up ten, twenty, thirty-fold, massive profits for them, less electricity for more money, etc., etc., etc., all these things. Plus your big boys can put you into your big massive camps called old rundown cities, like Agenda 21 wants you to do, off the land, and keep you stuck there, you see, living in poverty. Thatís called, you know, this is what they mean when theyíre bringing you into this new system for sustainability. Itís basically poverty theyíre talking about, as this generation dies off up to the year 2050 or so. This is from their own reports, remember.

 

So weíre managed like... Well actually, weíre like slave camps and cattle, as far as I can see it. And it doesnít matter about how much articles have been put out too by the geoengineers and all their world meetings, that theyíre actually doing it. Theyíve been doing it steadily since 1998. Read all their articles. Now theyíll even say that if we started to do this we could cause catastrophic events across the world; we could drastically change weather patterns, cause tornadoes, massive cooling, freezing even.  And here we are. Iíve got a fire on tonight and itís June, in Canada, in berry country. Iíve had monsoons for the last week, and I think theyíre going to give us it for the rest of the summer as far as I can see. Other countries are pretty well freezing yet too. But theyíre still saying, oh itís global warming. You understand, when you get this utter rubbish and you will not go by your own perceptions, then youíre doomed. Youíre given your perceptions and your logic to use. Albert Pike said it, people who will not use their own reason and logic and judgment, he said, are therefore steak on the table and a beast of burden by choice and consent.

 

12 good reasons the Met Office is alarmed

blogs.telegraph.co.uk / James Delingpole /June 14th, 2013

 

(A:  This is the Met Office that put all these terrible emails out, where they lied, lied, lied, lied, lied, because theyíre getting paid an awful lot of money to make it up. Plus they said too, they want to redistribute the wealth across the world, which theyíre now doing, which of course is Marxian.)

 

    Met Office To Hold Summit On Disappointing (sic) UK Weather

 

    The Guardian, 14 June 2013: Climate scientists and meteorologists are meeting next week to debate the causes of UKís disappointing weather in recent years.

 

    Washout summers. Flash floods. Freezing winters. Snow in May. Droughts. There is a growing sense that something is happening to our weather. But is it simply down to natural variability, or is climate change to blame?

 

    To try to answer the question the Met Office is hosting an unprecedented meeting of climate scientists and meteorologists next week (A:  Well, youíll get no truth from them.) to debate the possible causes of the UKís ďdisappointingĒ weather over recent years, the Guardian has learned.  (A:  STOP SPRAYING us.  Stop the geoengineering.)

 

I can get out early in the morning, itís the only time youíll see a bit of sky, and youíll see all the planes going back and forth in all directions and then the stuff merges together into a mush. You can smell it coming down; itís metallic in smell. The next thing you know, thatís your day gone; itís shot. Itís going to stay there the whole day and then you get rain. They know what theyíre doing. This is reality, folks. Itís been going on for years. But no one is going to come out and tell you, because theyíre all sworn to secrecy. This agenda is so important to change our whole way of living, because we will do what weíre told thinking weíre all going to go through terrible climactic changes. And then they blame you, that itís your fault, when theyíre causing it with geoengineering.  Itís quite simple. Itís quite simple, folks.

 

And this article here has got a whole bunch of articles on it to do with the weather, the present weather and the scientists disputing it all and all the rest of it. Itís quite interesting if you want to plod your way through it. But personally Iím fed up with it because I know whatís causing it. Iíve been watching it steadily, because my brain was working in í98 when they started spraying every darned day. And I kept watching it. And lots of other folk have done it too.

 

Also too, an article tonightÖ

 

NSAís Canadian counterpart runs massive domestic spying program

wsws.org / Keith Jones / 15 June 2013

 

(A:  In Canada they donít even have any pretense, I think, at particular limits and barriers or anything else.  Because thatís the way it is, you know, Canada really is like a colony of Britain, and the colonies, they donít tell much to the public whatsoever; thereís very little communication. What you get is really kind of statements, just hand-downs from on high that get printed, and the public kind of accept it very easily.)

 

Communications Security Establishment Canada (CSEC), the NSAís Canadian counterpart and longstanding partner, has been scrutinizing the metadata of Canadiansí electronic communications since at least 2005.  (A:  Itís before that.)

 

Moreover, the NSA routinely provides Canadaís security agencies with intelligence on Canadians and CSEC reciprocates by providing U.S. intelligence officials with information about people living in the U.S. (A:  Thatís what Britain did too with a lot of different countries. Well, weíre not allowed to spy on our own people but weíll use this agency over here to do it for us and weíll swap data with them. And thatís the arrangements they come to. See, lawsÖ You understand that youíre trained into almost guilt complexes about laws, infringing little laws and so on. And these guys go around all the time making arrangements to bypass laws. All the time. And thatís how they do it. The US gives all the data on Canada to the boys, and our boys say, well we didnít spy on them, the US gave it to us, and vice versa in the States. Not a bad deal.)  This arrangement allows both agencies to circumvent legal bans on warrantless surveillance of their own citizenryís communications.

 

It was ďcommonĒ for NSA ďto pass on information about Canadians,Ē Wayne Easter, Canadaís Solicitor-General in 2002-3, told the Toronto Star this week. As Solicitor-General, Easter was responsible for overseeing the operations of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP).

 

The extent and scope of CSECís spying and who is being targeted and why are all zealously guarded state secrets. The CSEC functions under secret directives issued by the Minister of Defenceódirectives whose very existence is unknown to parliamentarians, let alone the public at large. 

 

You understand too, that was a big thing they talked about during the Cold War, when the CIA and you had MI6 and all this kind of thing, and all these organizations, taking off on their own. I mean, who do they report to? How can you call yourself a democracy if youíve got agencies that run rampant, and when theyíre asked to account for anything, well we donít have to tell you anything, even to the politicians. Who do they report to? Is it the big CEO of the corporation? We donít know. It probably is. It probably is, folks. We live in a Disney World, we really do, for reality.

  

And too, the articles that Iíve read over the past, over the years too, where big, big international corporations get all the inside scoop on whoís going to invest in what, long before it happens, because they listen to all the data Ė theyíre getting all the electronic data Ė and they give their tips, you see, to the big boys that are in with them, who keep on top by staying sticking rich and powerful. Back with more after this.

 

Hi folks, weíre back Cutting Through The Matrix.  As I mentioned already and Iíll put this one up tonight too, about...

 

The Lead Vaccine Developer Comes Clean So She Can "Sleep At Night": Gardasil and Cervarix Don't Work, Are Dangerous, and Weren't Tested

Healthwyze.org / Sarah Cain

 

Dr. Diane Harper was the lead researcher in the development of the human papilloma virus vaccines, Gardasil and Cervarix.  She is the latest to come forward and question the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines.  She made the surprising announcement at the 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through 4th, 2009.  Her speech was supposed to promote the Gardasil and Cervarix vaccines, but she instead turned on her corporate bosses in a very public way.  When questioned about the presentation, audience members remarked that they came away feeling that the vaccines should not be used.

 

"I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldnít help but question why we need the vaccine at all."  -- Joan Robinson

 

Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States.  In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year (A:  Well, they never tell you that when they give you the vaccine, right.), and the number rises to well over 90% (A:  ...that resolve themselves...) in two years.  Harper also mentioned the safety angle.  All trials of the vaccines were done on children aged 15 and above, despite them currently being marketed for 9-year-olds.

 

So far, 15,037 girls have reported adverse side effects (A:  ...this is back a few years agoÖ) from Gardasil alone to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.), and this number only reflects parents who underwent the hurdles required for reporting adverse reactions.  At the time of writing, 44 girls are officially known to have died from these vaccines.  (A:  Itís a lot more now.) The reported side effects include Guillian Barrť Syndrome (paralysis lasting for years, or permanently -- sometimes eventually causing suffocation), lupus, seizures, blood clots, and brain inflammation.  (A:  ...a lot of strokes too.)  Parents are usually not made aware of these risks.

 

Dr. Harper, the vaccine developer, claimed that she was speaking out, so that she might finally be able to sleep at night.

 

ďAbout eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life.  (A:  Itís massive now, itís so rampant with promiscuity.) Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself.  But in those cases where it doesnít, and isnít treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells (A:  It doesnít say it wonít or it will.  It CAN lead to pre-cancerous cells...) which may develop into cervical cancer.Ē  -- Dr. Diane Harper

 

One must understand how the establishment's word games are played to truly understand the meaning of the above quote, and one needs to understand its unique version of "science".  When they report that untreated cases "can" lead to something that "may" lead to cervical cancer, it really means that the relationship is merely a hypothetical conjecture that is profitable if people actually believe it.  In other words, there is no demonstrated relationship between the condition being vaccinated for and the rare cancers that the vaccine might prevent, but it is marketed to do that nonetheless.  In fact, there is no actual evidence that the vaccine can prevent any cancer. (A:  This is from the woman who led the team that made it.) 

 

From the manufacturersí own admissions, the vaccine only works on 4 strains out of 40 (A:  ...thatís if it works at allÖ) for a specific venereal disease that dies on its own in a relatively short period, so the chance of it actually helping an individual is about the same as the chance of him being struck by a meteorite.  Why do nine-year-old girls need vaccinations for extremely rare and symptom-less venereal diseases that the immune system usually kills anyway?

 

This is the world you live in. And believe you me, fear is a great factor for massive profit, especially when government is on board, in the fascist style, with promoting all this stuff. Mind you too, all the politicians get their big payoffs, and they also get all the money for running for election from the big companies, folks. Thatís what your democracy is today, on every level. Thatís what it is.

 

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, itís good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Orwell Back in Fashion

Japan---Health Ministry Withdraws Recommendation for Cervical HPV Vaccine

Lead Vaccine Developer for Anti-HPV Vaccines Says They Don't Work

Scrap the Met Office---12 Good Reasons

Why the Met Office is Alarmed

NSA's Canadian Counterpart

Snowden Vows Details on NSA

Global Cyber-Chiefs say They Need to Pry Even Further

Surveillance is Never Enough

Democracy is Dead

Pre-Crime Artificial Intel. Programme

 


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:

BOOKS

"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3

&

"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)

CDs

Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)

&

Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)

DVDs

"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"