February 26, 2013 (#1277)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb. 26, 2013:

Mediascape is Mainly Fake:

"At Bottom-Level Reality, Life can Be Quite Boring,
With Recycled News, Sets You Off a-Snoring,
Reading the Agenda, You Always Know what's Coming,
Via Media Pundits, Updates Formal or Punning,
Little Bits of Statements Uttered by Elite
Flutter Down from Sky and Litter every Street,
Or Washed, Sanitized 'fore Appearing On the Screen,
Till Fact, Farce and Fantasy All Mix in a Dream,
Psych Warfare is Incessant, Reason is All Shattered,
Casualties are High, Forgetting All that Mattered"
© Alan Watt Feb. 26, 2013

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Feb. 26, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt. This is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 26th of February, 2013.

Newcomers, as always, I suggest you make good use of the website, cuttingthroughthematrix.com. You’ll see a bunch of sites listed there. They’re all the official sites I have. And you can actually download from them all. If you find sticking on one, try another one and see how it goes. A lot of folk go into the com at the same time and sometimes you get sticking downloads. Also all those sites listed there have transcripts for print-up, in English. If you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu, you’ll find transcripts in other languages. Remember too, you bring me to you. I don’t bring on guests as advertisers. This is not showbiz. And I don’t sell you products outside the books and discs that I have on the website, which are mine. And I don’t bring on advertisers as guests who go through the spiel of terrifying you and then offering you the solution of selling you something. I have no shares either in any of the products sold and so on. So, it’s up to you (the listeners) to keep me going and, as I say, this is amazing too that this particular broadcast is listened to around the world and it’s incredible how many people actually use it. And I say, it’s free but most folk just take it for granted and they think ‘well, it’ll always be there,’ when you switch it on; it’s like a light switch on; it’s always there and they don’t understand how you even get by because they don’t think about it at all. So, remember too, those who want to keep it going can help me keep going too by buying the books and the discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And to do so from the US, remember you can actually use a personal check to Canada from the US still. I think it’s the only country you can still do that to. And you can also use an international postal money order from the post office, from the US to Canada. You can send cash or use PayPal. And across the world, you’ve got Western Union, MoneyGram, and PayPal, once again. And straight donations are awfully, awfully, awfully welcome, in these times of deepening austerity, as they like to call it, this planned austerity, this post-consumerist society, that we’re supposed to go into now.

And it’s only when you read the big articles and books put out by the big boys themselves at the think tanks you understand that everything follows in sequence to make things happen, obviously. Like the bank crash happened when they had to make it happen. The banks lost nothing as we all know. In fact, they furthered their agenda by getting more power over the governments of the whole world, in fact, through it all. And every country is bailing out every other country now. It’s a fantastic bank scam because the countries borrow from international private lenders, in order to get these loans to bail out other countries. It’s wonderful. But you are put down as the guarantors. So, it’s a fantastic scheme but how else are they going to get you into austerity, the planned austerity, remember, that they talked about back in the 1970’s.

So, you’re in the century of change. This is for the time of austerity and it’s also a post-consumerist society, post-industrial society. In the West, it’s pretty-well a post-technological society because it’s mainly done in China and the Far East now, all the technology. So, you have to be trained, trained as we go under, to behave and they need an authoritarian society to make that happen, under the guise of 9/11, anti-terrorism and ‘terrorists under the bed’ sort of stuff. Then they’re using all of that to make it all happen and to get us all to obey and go along with it all. And getting us used to having less and less and less. Remember, the whole idea is to increase the cost of basic living, until there’s no free spending cash in your pocket at the end of the month. It all goes on fees, essentials, food, fuel and energy and so on. Because they’ve got more taxes to hit you with now, because you’ve got carbon taxes coming down your way soon too and energy taxes. They’ve even talked about mandatory inspections of everyone’s home. This is worldwide, remember. Agenda 21 came from the United Nations. All the countries signed onto it. And they’ll do thermal testing and then massive fines if you’re letting heat get out from some way or another. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And talking about the big system you’re born into and how it really works. And few people know they’re living through agendas. The United Nations, when they signed all their names onto it – that’s all your leaders signed their names onto it in 1946 – they were signing away your countries really basically and sovereignty too, because they came to the conclusion—and this was really what the war was about, was—to end nation-states altogether. And under the guise of doing that, they would flood countries with multiculturalism, which really wouldn’t keep cultures; for a while it would but they’d all fight each other and eventually come into some new mush that hasn’t been invented yet. This is basically the theory of it all. And then there’d be no more world wars. And again it was a ruse as well, to get all that to happen and much more to happen too. As I say, if you go through the masses of literature from the United Nations, it’s all in your face where they wanted to take you. And they know too, that during all this kind of thing you’ll also get massive problems in schools and ethnic communities. Britain’s had their shares of it over years as they bring in lots of people from really opposing cultures. And that’s the intention too; not similar cultures. The Europeans were to be kept out really of emigrating to each other’s countries and even to the old British Empire countries as well.

But you find this sort of article is getting pretty common now, even in the States now. It says

“School officials in Minneapolis have beefed up police protection and expect weeks of investigation in the wake of an all-out brawl between students at South High School in the Minnesota metropolis on February 14.”

 

Alan: And it says that:

“Rachel Hicks, speaking for the school district, said that additional school resource officers who are trained to interact with students are now on duty...”

 

Alan: And it was a racial thing and an ethnic thing at the same time, apparently. And it said that:

“In what the Minneapolis Star-Tribune reported was a ‘racially tinged’ melee, between 200 and 300 students shoved, kicked and threw bottles at one another. At least three students and a school staff member were taken by ambulance to a hospital for medical treatment. Reports indicate that students at the school said that the fight broke out after tensions between Somali-Americans and other students flared.”

 

Alan: Up. And it says that

“The Somalis are largely Muslim, clashing with students of various other ethnic and religious backgrounds including American Indians and black Americans. A student was quoted by local media as saying that the riot was a ‘racial issue’ and was the most significant of this year.”

 

Alan: Now, this is the sort of thing that gets more and more common, as this big agenda is moved into place and we have to live through it. But unfortunately it can go any way it wants really, these kind of conflicts, it depends on how the big boys at the top handle all the propaganda and how they manage this kind of story. But you find out how far it gets, eventually in places like Britain. And Britain, remember, was to be completely destroyed, according to Tony Blair’s right-hand man. And I’ve read the articles from the mainstream, where they basically said they were bringing in all the multiculturalism to destroy what was left of British culture forever, so it couldn’t rise again.

And, there have been massive campaigns through Hollywood and so on, about, really, the target group... the target group. And here’s a victim of the target group. It says,

“Boy, 9...”

 

Alan: In England... it says,

“...found hanged...”

 

Alan: He was nine years old. He was being

“ ‘...bullied for being white’. Aaron Dugmore, nine, found hanged at Birmingham home by his mother. Believed to be Britain’s second youngest ‘suicide’ caused by bullying. The schoolboy was rushed to hospital but died of suspected cardiac arrest. Family claim Aaron was being tormented by bullies at his new school. Police are investigating the circumstances surrounding Aaron’s death”

 

Alan: And it says,

“They said Aaron was threatened with a plastic knife by one Asian pupil, who warned him: ‘Next time it will be a real one.’ He was also allegedly told by another pupil that ‘all the white people should be dead’ and he was forced to hide from the bullies in the playground at lunchtime. Aaron’s mother, Kelly-Marie Dugmore, 30, and stepfather Paul Jones, 43, said that despite complaints to the school, nothing was done to stop the bullying.”

 

Alan: And it says,

“Aaron had recently started in Year Five at Erdington Hall Primary School in Birmingham, a school where 75 per cent of pupils come from ethnic minority backgrounds.”

 

Alan: So, that’s fairly typical now and expect more and more of this to come down the road. And this was all intentional. The big boys who planned all this, knew it would come to this phase and remember they’ve had riots before in Britain too and places and even the cities were burned down over the riots back in the late 70’s. So, everything’s going the way it’s supposed to go. And out of it all comes more and more bureaucracies, more government control, more indoctrination into the teachers who indoctrinate the students and so on. And that’s just the way it’s planned to go.

Also, in Britain too, it’s quite interesting... it’s a non-event really, this little article, but at the same time too, it shows you how people think. People think that there’s a justice in the world, if they get their chance to go into court. And remember, John Hill, the guy who was charged for putting out the Ripple Effect video, questioning the whole series of bombings, in England, in London. And then they put him up for treason, initially; tried to try him for that and put him away forever. But he did think he would get his day in court where he could say that the whole story was full of holes, which it was. And he did inspire many other people to look into it too, to find out that these bombers were supposedly on a train in the morning that wasn’t even running that day. They knew that in the court too. They were on that train but it wasn’t running. I mean there’s your doublespeak for you, right there, you know. Anyway, he thought he’d have his day in court but, of course, they didn’t give you a chance to say anything at all.

This one here’s about the BBC. And it says,

“Historic Court Hearings: The BBC in the Dock for Manipulating Evidence and Providing Biased Coverage of the September 11, 2001 Attacks”

 

Alan: And it says,

“What is at stake is the BBC’s coverage of the 9/11 attacks. On February 25, in the small town of Horsham in the United Kingdom, there will be a rare and potentially groundbreaking opportunity for the 9/11 truth movement. Three hours of detailed 9/11 evidence is to be presented and considered in a court of law where the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) will be challenged over the inaccurate and biased manner in which it has portrayed the events and evidence of 9/11. Over the last 16 months, BBC has been challenged strongly by individuals in the UK over two documentaries that they showed in September 2011 as part of the tenth anniversary of 9/11, namely ‘9/11: Conspiracy Road Trip’ and ‘The Conspiracy Files: 9/11 Ten Years On’. Formal complaints were lodged with BBC over the inaccuracy and bias of these documentaries, which, according to 9/11 activists, was in breach of the operating requirements of BBC through their ‘Royal Charter and Agreement’ with the British public.”

 

Alan: Well, the British public never signed it, mind you, but technically they do when they pay up their fees every year, the license to watch the damned trash that they put out there. It says,

“This document requires BBC to show information that is both accurate and impartial. These complaints were supported by the US-based educational charity Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth (AE911Truth), which submitted detailed scientific evidence to BBC to buttress the complaints. The evidence focuses in particular on the confirmed free-fall of WTC 7...”

 

Alan: The World Trade Center Number 7 Tower.  Remember, 7 Tower came down later. And there’s videos up there where they actually talk about we’ll have a controlled demolition. And it says,

“... and NIST’s 2008 admission of this fact. In addition, over 300 AE911Truth petition signers supported these complaints by sending letters to BBC, requesting that BBC show this evidence to the public. Not a single mainstream media has acknowledged the court case. And it is highly unlikely that the proceeding will be the object of unbiased coverage.”

 

Alan: And I’ve got two articles on this, but it does mention that one guy is getting taken to court, he’s going to be in court because he’s not going to pay his license until... actually he quoted the Terrorism Act. He said he would be supporting the Terrorism Act if he gave money to the BBC, when it’s giving you all this false evidence and that’s where he’s standing. But whether they go with it, I don’t know because you never get to say what’s right and what’s wrong. In fact, I think the judge already said, basically, the facts don’t matter. How many times have you heard that, the facts don’t matter? The facts are, are you going to pay your license or not? And are you still watching the BBC? And he’ll get fined for that and the judge won’t ask what his complaint is all about. So, you don’t get your day in court. The justice system has nothing to do with right and wrong, and I hope you understand that. Never has been. It’s all technical points and legalities and points of legalities and stuff like that. And it’s not an inquiry where you can say what you want. It’s a court case, so the poor guy will get fined. But good luck to him for at least standing up and doing something.

Now, also, I’ll put up tonight too, it says,

“The granting of the Best Picture Oscar to the Iranophobic movie Argo has long been foreseeable as the Machiavellian maneuvering of Hollywood propaganda [and that it] harbors a much more elaborate imperialistic scheme, political analysts say”

 

Alan: And it says,

“‘I put my money on this film to win the Best Picture Oscar (even though there is nothing remotely ‘best’ about it) especially if Obama can pull off winning the Presidential election,’ wrote cultural critic Kim Nicolini in an article published at Counterpunch Website in October 2012. ‘Argo, above all else, is a piece of conservative liberal propaganda created by Hollywood to support the Obama administration’s conservative liberal politics...’”

 

Alan: Actually, it’s neo-cons.

“... as we move toward the Presidential election,’ she said before Obama was re-elected for the second term. ‘It also primes the war wheels for an American-supported Israeli attack on Iran, so that Leftists can feel okay about the war when they cast their vote for Obama in November (2012),’ the critic pointed out. At the 85th edition of Academy Awards at the Dolby Theatre in Hollywood, California, on Sunday, Michelle Obama, the US First Lady, announced Argo as winner of the Best Picture Oscar, live from the White House. The thriller directed by US filmmaker Ben Affleck is loosely based...”

 

Alan: {Laughs} It’s loosely based indeed...

“...on the allegedly historical account by former CIA agent Tony Mendez about the rescue of six American diplomats during the takeover of the US Embassy in Tehran after Iran’s 1979 Islamic Revolution. The revolutionary Iranian university students who took over the US Embassy believed that the embassy had turned into a den of espionage which aimed to overthrow the nascent Islamic Republic establishment. Argo only tells the rescue operation of the six Americans from the Canadian Embassy in Iran, with no mentioning of the 53 Americans who spent 444 days in the US Embassy. Nicolini lashed out at Argo for completely neglecting to provide the Iranian’s side of the story, noting, ‘The film is a sanitized version of the events.’ She argued that ‘there is nothing authentic about the film’s manipulation of historical events,’ and described the movie as ‘pure political propaganda.’”

 

Alan: Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. We’re back. Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about the movie, Argo. And it says here,

“Former Canadian Ambassador to Iran Ken Taylor has heavily criticized the movie, saying, ‘The amusing side is the script writer (Chris Terrio) in Hollywood had no idea what he’s talking about.’ He said Argo downplays the actual extent of the Canadian involvement which was considerable. Taylor criticized Argo for incorporating a myriad of creative liberties that included the ‘black and white’ portrayal of Iranian people and fabricated scenes, adding that Argo ‘characterizes people in a way that isn’t quite right.’ The former Canadian envoy argued that Argo didn’t portray ‘a more conventional side,’ and ‘a more hospitable side’ of the Iranian society as well, an ‘intent that they were looking for some degree of justice.’ Political analysts say Argo unmasks the elaborate US scheme to employ every medium in its propaganda apparatus to incite Iranophobia across the globe. ‘Argo is an arrant instance of Hollywoodism. In point of fact, it is yet another attempt to foment Iranophobia not only in the USA but across the world as well,’ Iranian academic Dr. Ismail Salami wrote in an article on Press TV website in November 2012.”

 

Alan: It says,

“‘In recent years, Iranophobia has come to encompass a wider scope of media including cinema which is incontestably capable of exercising a more powerful effect on manipulating the audience,’ he said.”

 

Alan: And it’s so true. When you see things with emotion in it and so on, they can make you believe anything.

“The analyst also lashed out at Argo’s director for portraying a ‘stereotyped and caricatured view’ of the Iranian society and noted that Affleck has consciously sought to ridicule ‘the very customs and traditions’ of Iran.”

 

Alan: Well, there’s nothing new, as I say, in what Hollywood puts out to do with any of the countries across there; as we know, it’s part of the military-industrial complex.

Also, too, they want to put aspartame in milk without a label. I’ll put that link up tonight too. And it says,

“Big Dairy...”

 

Alan: That’s the big corporate farms now that run the world, are pushing the FDA for approval, which they’ll get, in other words too. I have no doubt about it. It says,

“Two powerful dairy organizations, The International Dairy Foods Association (IDFA) and the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), are petitioning the Food and Drug Administration to allow aspartame and other artificial sweeteners to be added milk and other dairy products without a label.”

 

Alan: So, everything’s going down the tube, isn’t it? Or is it? It’s going the way it’s supposed to go, I suppose.

Also, tonight too, I’d like to put up A Petition to be presented to the Canadian House of Commons regarding high altitude aerial spraying, which is, of course, chemtrails, as they call them. I’ll put this up tonight, this link, for those who want to sign it and see what they say and what comes out of it, because they’re supposed to answer these things if there’s so many thousands of signatures on it. But we’ll see because it’s under the Official Secrets Act, so I doubt that they’ll come out and say anything at all.

And, it says,

“Collapsing Consensus – Another German Meteorology Site Wonders About The Global Temperature Stagnation. Last week German meteorologist Dominik Jung openly wondered what had happened to all the warming, pointing out that Germany was suffering from its fifth consecutive colder than normal winter – a record!”

 

Alan: By the way, there’s another one I’ll put up tonight too, and the US broke over 500 records this winter alone across the whole of the US, in different places, for low temperatures. But it says,

“Last month German meteorologist Dr. Karsten Brandt...”

 

Alan: Again, said, global warming... dismissed the whole catastrophic events that they keep pushing, as nonsense.

“And just days ago, yet another German meteorology site questioned global warming in a piece titled: ‘Global Warming Stagnates – Guessing The Causes’.”

 

Alan: It says,

“‘Since 1998 the global mean temperature has not risen significantly. While the global temperature rose by about 0.5°C from the 1970s until the end of the 1990s, it has stagnated for the last 15 years, though at a high level. [...] The stagnation surprised a lot of experts, who are now searching for possible causes for this development.’”

 

Alan: Well, how about the aerial spraying?  See, they’re controlling the whole weather now. It’s controlled. It has been. It’s interesting 1998 is when they really started it, in earnest on a daily basis, just spraying the skies above you.

 And also:

“The Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy”

 

Alan: Interesting. It’s a book that’s come out. Now, I can’t connect these guys to the Club of Rome, but what they’re pushing here is all the stuff that came out of the Club of Rome. Remember, the Club of Rome were given the task by the United Nations of coming up with something to pull the world together. We’d all unite in the world together and go under an authoritarian-type society to save ourselves. And they were the guys who said that eventually they picked on global warming, famine, drought, hunger and so on and that would fit the bill. And that’s their own words for it too, that would fit the bill. So these guys are very, very similar. They must be connected with it in some way. It says the Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. Now, the Club of Rome also said democracy wouldn’t work. And to get the big agendas through, it was too cumbersome, too many conflicting parties all fighting each other and they’d have to go into an authoritarian society. So, here you have it again, with a book that’s come out, Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy by David Shearman and Joseph Wayne Smith. And it says here,

“"In this latest volume of the Politics and Environment series, professor emeritus of medicine David Shearman and philosopher and ecologist Joseph Wayne Smith show a complete willingness to challenge organizational identities. They forcefully argue that our system of overall political, economic, and social governance is an obstacle to confronting effectively the looming environmental crises that global climate change poses. Shearman and Smith challenge us to reexamine how states, corporations, and consumers are driving us, literally, to the brink of disaster. In engaging considerations of the limits to growth...”

 

Alan: Now, “The Limits to Growth” is also a book they put out too, by the Club of Rome. So, I’m sure they’ve got something to do with it or actually they are members of the Club of Rome. Limits to Growth. It says,

“...the separation of corporatism and governance, financial reform, legal reform, and the reclaiming of the ‘commons’ for human society, they ask us to consider what is often considered unthinkable in our cosmopolitan...”

 

Alan: Ideology. In other words, democracy. Reconsider what democracy is and do we need it. Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. We’re back, Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about a book that’s out, called  Climate Change Challenge and the Failure of Democracy. I’m certain it’s the Club of Rome because they’re using all the terminology that they normally spout. But it says,

“In short, Shearman and Smith argue that liberal democracy - considered sacrosanct in modern societies - is an impediment to finding ecologically sustainable solutions for the planet. Many, of course, will find this argument untenable. But I would urge readers to listen closely to Shearman and Smith’s entertaining and always thoughtful arguments.”

 

Alan: As they spin your mind, of course.

“In an era of ever widening, ever deepening globalization, liberal democracies have proven unable, or unwilling, to check the explosive growth of corporatism’s power, influence, and reach. In terms that mirror Marx’s thoughts on the aggregation of capital into the hands of the fewer and fewer, Shearman and Smith are nonetheless, not neo-Marxists...”

 

Alan: Well, they’re not; they’re Trotskyists. This is the little con that they pull. They’re Trotskyists.

“In some ways, their notions that liberal democracy must give way to ‘a form of authoritarian government by experts’...”

 

Alan: That’s exactly what’s always been the agenda.

“...reminds us as well of Plato’s Republic.”

 

Alan: That I’ve mentioned so often, as well. So, you know where it’s coming from. And this article was put out by the Pell Center for International Relations and Public Policy. It sounds very official – again, a private organization, as they all are. But this is where they’re going with everything, to terrify the public under anything, excuse... you know, save us, save us all, save the planet.  Aliens aren’t good enough anymore. We’ve seen too many science fictions. It had the opposite effect, until we laugh at them, so now they’re using global warming and all that kind of stuff, even though we’re freezing our butts off.

And it says here,

“Rich get richer with IRS loophole in sunny Bermuda. Billionaire hedge-fund moguls are getting comfortable with a US tax loophole to fatten their already plump bottom lines. All it takes to avoid tens of millions of dollars in taxes is a short trip to Bermuda — not by them, but their cash. Hedgies like John Paulson and Steve Cohen are forming reinsurance companies in tax-free havens like Bermuda or the Cayman Islands — and then transferring cash from their funds to the reinsurance companies. The cash, classified as insurance company reserves, is then transferred back into the funds as reserves to be invested for future claims. Thanks to an IRS loophole, profits from these insurance companies aren’t taxed — until the stake in the fund is sold, and that could be years down the line.”

 

Alan: And it says,

“And here’s the kicker: The taxes, when paid, are at the lower capital-gains rate and not as ordinary income. Here’s how Bermuda reinsurance cash can pay off: $100 million of regular cash invested in a fund returning 15 percent annually and taxed at the top rate will result in a $50 million profit after taxes. But the Bermuda cash will produce a profit of $77 million. Paulson, for example, shipped $450 million last year into a Bermuda company called Pacre Ltd., which is his own ‘brass plate’ reinsurance company, according to Bloomberg, which reported on this growing trend yesterday. Pacre Ltd. is basically an office mail-drop without employees.”

 

Alan: It’s all legal, folks, because these folk at the top run the legal system too.

“Pacre Ltd. is basically an office mail-drop without employees. Within months, that cash was recycled out of Bermuda and back into Paulson’s hedge funds in New York, tax-free, to make him even richer without any tax bills for years into the future. These types of reinsurance companies are permitting US taxpayers to defer — indefinitely — US tax,’ lawyer David S. Miller, a tax expert at Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft, told Bloomberg. He branded the move as ‘an unjustified benefit.’ Washington has been promising for a decade to shut this loophole —

 

Alan: This particular one.

“...but hasn’t gotten around to it.”

 

Alan: You know, there’s too many things on the go. {Laughs}

“More and more hedge-fund billionaires are relying on tax-haven reinsurance mail drops to legally avoid taxes — including Third Point’s Daniel Loeb and Greenlight Capital Inc.’s David Einhorn, it was reported. The companies set up by Paulson, Cohen and Loeb are located within a half-mile of each other in the narrow streets ringing Bermuda’s capital, Hamilton, according to Bloomberg. Loeb’s Third Point Reinsurance holds about $785 million in funds, including $75 million of Loeb’s own money, the report said. Cohen’s offshore reinsurer SAC Re holds about $500 million, including $125 million of Cohen’s cash, Bloomberg said. Bermuda’s quaint, pastel buildings on a small commercial strip along Hamilton’s harbor are affixed with scores of brass plates of reinsurance companies from around the world. Generations of investors have used reinsurance as an investment and tax-avoidance tool, but a decade ago the IRS vowed to clamp down on its abuses, with little today to show and no prosecutions.”

 

Alan: So, they haven’t changed anything at all.

“Bloomberg said at least three new reinsurers backed by US hedge fund managers put a combined $1.7 billion back into the managers’ hands in the US.”

 

Alan: So, it’s one set for the rich and the ones who pay it all are the guys of the general population, of course, for everything.

Also too, everybody knows about the – if they still remember, of course, because they’ve got short memories now – the Savile scandal in Britain, with his years and years of pedophilia and all the carry-on at the BBC where he worked. They all knew about it and so on and lots of other ones were involved in it too. But it says,

“So much for BBC transparency! 90 pages of BBC’s Savile report...”

 

Alan: Which was supposed to be a report on him by the BBC.

“...were blacked out, DG goes to ground... and no one is blamed for fiasco”

 

Alan: So,

“3,000 pages of emails, interviews and submissions released online at 11am.”

 

Alan: And it says here that,

“The BBC faced ridicule last night for publishing an ‘open’ dossier into the Jimmy Savile scandal that was covered in censor’s ink. The corporation had repeatedly promised to be open and transparent about the material, which formed the basis of last year’s Pollard inquiry into the Savile crisis. But there were accusations of a cover-up after large swathes of staff testimonies about the saga were blacked out. Despite the redactions, which covered around 90 pages, stinging criticism remained – including Jeremy Paxman’s fury at the ‘contemptible’ way the BBC handled the affair. He said it was ‘pathetic’ Newsnight had not tackled the Savile issue sooner, and said it was ‘common gossip’ at the corporation that the DJ ‘liked young…girls’.

 

Alan: And occasionally boys too.

But Paxman’s strongest criticisms of his bosses, including then director of news Helen Boaden, appear to be among hundreds of lines of evidence censored by the BBC.”

 

Alan: And that was another pal. I think Helen Boaden was a great pal of Savile’s. There’s some photographs of her with him.

“Last night the BBC’s claims to be accountable descended into farce as acting director-general Tim Davie refused to be interviewed by anyone except his own journalists. Channel 4 News editor Ben de Pear said the only time he had come across a comparable situation was when he had tried to interview despots such as Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe, president Mahmoud Ahmedinejad of Iran and president Charles Taylor of Liberia.”

 

Alan: I should also add into it, the directors of the movie, Argo.

“Paxman himself is among several journalists who are said to be furious about the censorship of their testimonies.”

 

Alan: Well, nothing happens about being furious and all that kind of stuff, nothing. It’s just another... it’s all getting white-washed. They have to white-wash it; there’s too many important people involved in the same pedophilia rings as Savile. In fact, MI5 have lots of dossiers, they were using them for blackmail purposes, if they ever needed them, on some of the guys.

Also too, this article’s about Blackwater because now you live in this public-private partnership deals now and they even privatize militaries and all that kind of stuff. It says,

“Contractors of the US private security firm Blackwater secured the site of a roadside bomb attack”

 

Alan: And so on. All the PR photographs are at the beginning of this particular article. It says,

“European states are subcontracting an increasing number of tasks to private military companies to cut their armies’ sizes and budgets.”

 

Alan: Which is nonsense because they’re more expensive than the regular army.

“These mainly US firms cost them dearly, however, says military expert Alexandre Vautravers. Since the 1990s, the United States Armed Forces and particularly also the armies of Europe have been using private military firms to handle tasks they can no longer fulfil.”

 

Alan: It says,

“Alexandre Vautravers, head of the department of international relations at Webster University in Geneva and chief editor of Revue Militaire Suisse, explains why. Alexandre Vautravers: Private military companies primarily work in niche markets, in activities which conventional armed forces cannot or do not want to carry out. Armies with annual budgets are not necessarily profitable according to defence representatives. They prefer to entrust a whole number of maintenance and logistics tasks to those companies. During the war in Iraq, for example, the US army signed extremely lucrative contracts for laundry, hygiene and cleaning.”

 

Alan: I don’t know if you ever saw the movie that they put out on Halliburton, where the US treasury actually, they printed it up millions and millions of dollars. You see it getting flown in and taken off the plane over in Iraq and handed to the Halliburton corporation, that started buying brand new stretch-limos and all the rest of it, just like crazy... you wouldn’t believe it. Plus the filtration systems for the troops weren’t even working properly. All the troops were getting poisoned and contaminated with contaminated water. What an incredible farce that was. All that money just disappeared. Anyway, it says,

“These companies also win a lot of contracts to protect people and buildings, an area where the employment of trained and heavily equipped professional military staff is not always justified. Finally, they fill the gaps by providing qualified personnel.”

 

Alan: Such as helicopter pilots and so on. And it says,

“...but the pilots often do not stay for a long time because the salaries are much more lucrative in private industry.”

 

Alan: So, they go into private industry. So, it’s just mercenary work. And this whole article is about it. It’s not cheaper though. It’s more expensive. And also,

“Moody’s strips Britain of top-notch rating”

 

Alan: See how the whole con of money works and the guys who run it all? I mean it’s not bad enough they already have you in massive debt in every country, because somehow along the line all these democracies supposedly started borrowing money from private bankers, rather than printing their own and creating their own cash. And number one too, no-one ever asks why does a country have to borrow money from outside anything, anyway. Look at the cash they already rake in. You see, the whole banking system is a fraud; a very intelligent fraud... been running for years. And anybody who tries to stop it, they won’t last long at all. They’ll be dead before you know it. There’s no way about it. If you want to get gangsterism, go into the cash system and who runs the world. So they get Britain and all the other countries to start bailing out other countries by borrowing money to give to these other countries to bail them out... this circle that they put them into. So, every country’s borrowing money and getting deeper into debt to bail out other countries that are already in debt. And so now they all end up in debt. Isn’t that fantastic? And then the guys who lend you money get these guys like Moody’s, to rate you for debt rating and then they downgrade you, which means that you pay a higher interest on your future borrowing. It’s beautiful. What a scam, eh? What a beautiful scam. Oh, it really is, isn’t it? It’s like you keep getting up and you get slapped in the face until you’re down again and you get up again and you get slapped, slapped, slapped. And we’re supposed to believe this is an honest system we’re living in. What a joke. What a joke. All the big boys, including these rating companies, work together, folks. They all know each other, awfully well. A lot of them are intermarried with each other. So, I’ll put this up tonight too, at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.

And, this article too, again, is about Blackwater. It says,

“RALEIGH, N.C. (AP) - The federal prosecution of five former employees of the private security firm Blackwater has crumbled after the defendants said they were acting at the behest of ...”

 

Alan: Guess who...

“...the CIA by providing five guns as gifts to King Abdullah II of Jordan.”

 

Alan: This is what it’s about. It says,

“Federal prosecutors indicted former Blackwater president Gary Jackson and four others in 2010 on a long list of felony firearms violations involving dozens of weapons, including 17 M-4 military assault rifles and 17 Romanian-made AK-47s. All charges against three of the accused were dismissed Thursday at the request of prosecutors after a federal judge ruled earlier this month to reduce several of the felony charges to misdemeanors.”

 

Alan: Can you imagine getting off with a misdemeanor for that, in your own country, never mind abroad?

“Under a plea agreement, Jackson and former company vice president William Matthews admitted guilt Thursday on misdemeanor charges related to record keeping violations,”

 

Alan: Just record keeping violations.

“...resulting in $5,000 fines and four months house arrest. They had originally faced decades in prison on 12 felony charges each.”

 

Alan: Well that’s what happens, strings are pulled and that’s what you get, you know. That’s how it really works, isn’t it?

And British members of parliament... because they really are... you understand the psychopathic personality that goes into politics in the first place and they are sussed out by psychopaths. When you get your résumé started to get into politics, you have to go into local government. Before you get into local government you got to go into charity work, where you join certain charities to get your face in there. And there’s always some elderly fellow there, sitting there, that does a lot of golfing... this is how it works... I’m not kidding you... And he’s the guy who will eventually pick people – the right people – to get bumped up the ladder. He’s got the word into local councils and then from local councils into your local political party, etc. That’s how you get into it. And they all come in with their briefcases and stuff and they all work, generally, in other jobs. They come in with their briefcases and they have their one-hour session once a week or something and eat lots of cakes and have coffee and say very little about the charity they’re involved in. The whole point is you’re being sussed out by the fat guy at the end of the table that does a lot of golfing. You see? Because he’s looking for the... psychopaths recognize each other, you understand. Immediately. And that’s the kind they want into politics. That’s why they’re always involved in scandals and all the rest of it. They don’t follow the norms or the cultural norms of society in their sexual things or anything like that either. But it says, members of parliament, in Britain, their computers:

“MPs’ computers used to access porn sites, including foot and fat fetishism, more than 2,500 times”

 

Alan: Supposedly on one site. And so they

“... are being used to view hardcore pornography featuring sadomasochism and foot and fat fetishism. The X-rated websites have been accessed more than 2,500 times on computers used by MPs, peers and their staff. Gay cruising websites have also been visited a further 3,500 times along with obscure erotica sites – including one showing naked women posing with cats. Asked for an explanation, a parliamentary spokesman claimed the sites may have been visited accidentally.”

 

Alan: {Laughs} This is your government. And that’s their PR spokesman. This is your government, folks, and they lie about this. They lie about everything, you see. “Accidentally.” It says,

“The Mail on Sunday obtained the information through a Freedom of Information enquiry. It covers a 14-month period between May 2011 and July 2012. The visits are a breach of parliamentary IT rules, which bar online ‘pornography’, ‘nudity’ and ‘adult/mature content’.”

“It follows the revelation in this newspaper earlier this month that parliamentary computers were used to click thousands of times on a website that encourages adulterous affairs.”

 

Alan: And you couldn’t make this stuff up.

“Harry Potter, a barrister...”

 

Alan: A lawyer. Harry Potter,

“...specialising in obscenity cases, said: ‘Having viewed the material, it does not in my opinion fall foul of the law as constituting extreme pornography.”

 

Alan: Well, what’s his opinion? What would he call “extreme pornography”, Mr. Harry Potter, eh?

“It is, however, undoubtedly hardcore pornography.’ A variety of foot fetish websites – which include pornographic images of lurid sex acts involving feet...”

 

Alan: Well, what can you do with your... well I shouldn’t ask that question.

“– have been viewed 470 times. Another website featuring an array of pictures of naked women lying next to cats has been viewed 17 times. A Polish pornography website was accessed 292 times in May 2011.”

 

Alan: It’s probably the same guy, I bet you.

“In the same month a dating website was clicked on 653 times. The website boasts it is ‘dedicated to connecting fun-loving singles across the UK’.”

 

Alan: So, anyway, that’s your government, for you. There’s nothing new in that, at all... at all, at all.

Now, the

“Bank of England deputy governor Paul Tucker has said negative interest rates should be considered.”

 

Alan: As we all say, oh yeah well we know all about that, right? Well, I’ll go into negative interest rates when I come back from this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. We’re back. Cutting Through the Matrix. And talking about negative interest rates. Now, what it is, basically, is giving you less interest on any savings you put in, so it’s going to affect the savers. And this guy actually says it. He says,

“Any discussion of negative rates would have to take into account the likely detrimental impact on savers, who have already seen the income from their savings fall since the financial crisis.”

 

Alan: What they want to get it down to is to give you no interest on any savings at all, which, again, this is a great boon at the bank, as well, because they invest that cash as soon as you put it in there and they get 20, 30, 40 – depends on their Moody’s ratings, you see – they get back from their loans. They make a killing on it. So, here they go with another killing of dropping the interest given back to people who are saving. So, that’s what really it’s about. This is what they want to do. You see. Get more profit for themselves, to save us all, you understand. It’s always the same thing, to save us, isn’t it?

And in China too, they’re back to trafficking kidneys, from the poor folk in China, a place that’s raking in trillions every week, for God’s sake, on all their sales across the planet, but the folk at the bottom are just the same as ever. Actually, it’s a perfect form of feudalism, isn’t it? Really. They still call it a communist government. It’s just a bunch of guys at the top, inter-related families that run the whole country in a feudal system, with perfect slaves at the bottom. So, the folk at the bottom are just as poor as ever, so they’re selling off their body parts while they’re still alive. Quite sad, isn’t it?

And as I say too, it says in this article

“Over 650 snow records set in USA this week – another wonky surface station located”

 

Alan: I’ll put this up tonight as well for anybody that cares about the ongoing nonsense about global warming. And Mr. Hollande of France (the prime minister) has been given the Peace Prize, after he sent the bombers loose, of course, in Mali. I’ll put that one up too. That’s what you need to do to get a Peace Prize. You have to go and kill folk. They all get it. They all get their chance at it. It depends how many folk you kill, or actually who you kill, as well. It depends if it’s their favorite folk that you’re killing, you see.

And this one too... this is very interesting, it says

“A former senior Scotland Yard officer...”

 

Alan: That’s the British top cops there.

“...has warned that corruption may fail to be exposed under plans to regulate the police and the media.”

 

Alan: See, all the media now is to be regulated, just like Australia did it too. And in Britain they got Lord Justice Leveson to put his bunch of stuff through. So, it’s supposedly to

“...stop whistleblowers from speaking to the press and harm the public interest. Today, Mr Hurley said: ‘How did the press find out about the MPs’ expense scandal? How did we find out about patient care deals, and others between HMRC and major corporate failures? The media find out about them very often because people come forward and tell them about it.’ ”

 

Alan: But he’s saying that with these new laws that are coming out, he says,

“‘My concern is we are creating a culture across the whole public sector where people won’t talk to the media about what’s going on.’”

 

Alan: Will be afraid to talk to the media about what’s going on.  Well of course, that’s the intention of it. You’re not living in any democracy. You’re living under the facade of it. But even that’s to be trained out of you, eventually, until everybody gets the message without actually being told explicitly. A lot of folk already accept it, actually. If you ask most youngsters about things they just give you a blank stare, you know. They don’t care about privacy or anything else. It’s irrelevant to them. So, as I say, we’re all going under the microscope to see what we say and all the rest of it, as they censor, censor, censor. Even the mainstream... not that many in the mainstream ever say much of any import to the public. But it’s really to go after all the rest of us, you see, that are not authorized to be out there, opening your mouths.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

{Closing Music ♫}

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

Ethnic Tensions Explode at Minneapolis School

Boy, 9yrs.-old Hanged after Being Bullied for Being of White Minority in English School

Licence Evader and 9/11

Argo----Another Deliberate Hollywood Misrepresentation of History

Powerful Organizations Lobby to Use Aspartame in Dairy Products

Canadian Petition regarding High Altitude Aerial Spraying

Collapsing Consensus on Global Warming

Over 650 Snow Records set in US this Week

Climate Challenge and the Failure of Democracy

IRS Loophole in Bermuda

BBC Blacks Out 90 Pages of Savile Report

Mercenary firms: a lucrative niche market

Moody's Strips Britain of Top Rating

Most charges dismissed against ex-Blackwater execs

Two former Blackwater Executives Plead Guilty to Weapons Charges

Members of Parliament Using Computers to Visit Sado-Masochistic and Fetish Sites

Negative Interest Rates floated by Tucker of Bank of England

Kidney Trafficking in China

Peace Prize for PM Hollande for Bombing Africa

Police Chief Warns of Danger of Regulating the Press