Jan. 4, 2013 (#1242)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:

 

Poem Copyright Alan Watt Jan. 4, 2013:

American Dream to Primal Scream:

"Lightning Changes toward "The Planned Society"
Where the Peasants Work with Humble Piety,
Serving "The Greater Good", Brotherhood of Man,
Following Future Carrot-Utopian Master-Plan,
Of Course it's Psychological Warfare on Majority,
Already Conquered by a New Dominant Minority
Which by Creating Crises, Both Fictional and Real,
They Disrupt Logic and Memory Which They Steal,
Keeping the Frightened Herd Stampeded,
Breaking Culture, Staffing New Departments Needed
To Rule Over the Chaos They Create
In Order to Brutally Rule Over Those They Hate,
Bombarding Victims with Pavlovian Barrage,
From News Anchors and Politicos, Good Camouflage"
© Alan Watt Jan. 4, 2013

 

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - Jan. 4, 2013 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)

 

Hi folks.  I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on January 4, 2013. Newcomers, as always, please help yourself to the free audios for download at cuttingthroughthematrix.com.  Remember too, you’ll also find on the .com site all my other official sites and transcripts for print-up in English. If you go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu you can get transcripts in other languages. As always remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you; I depend upon you to get any kind of cash coming in here at all, to keep this all going.  [Order and donation options listed above.]  Remember, straight donations are awfully, awfully welcome. 

 

We’re going through massive times; changes have been happening very quickly now. There’s lots of laws on the books across the world.  The United Nations is getting heavily involved now in the Internet and censoring will come very, very quickly. It already is in some areas in fact, has been if you’re politically incorrect and you’re not going along with the main agenda, or any parts of the main agenda in fact. They’re actually pulling a lot of sites. Even religious sites that complain about abortion have been pulled off. See, right into this big, big, big system which is really identical – for those who don’t understand history, and most folk don’t understand history at all. They don’t understand that… They always think history happens somewhere else and their own history is separate, and that somehow it just stays that way forever and ever. They don’t realize that the same system that took over Russia for instance, the Bolshevik Revolution, financed by the Western bankers, and they even trained all the terrorists to send over there, just like we’re doing the same today in other countries, and the Rockefeller Foundation funded a lot of that, to take over Russia. And they called it the Soviet system once they had it on the go.  They were all disarmed, those people there, by the Bolsheviks. Once they did that they slaughtered them. All the ones that they didn’t like, who wanted independence or freedom or didn’t want to go along with this totalitarian regime, were slaughtered by the millions, multi-millions of them. But people think that that was then and that was there. They don’t realize that the same people who did it to the Soviet Union have the same ideologies in place in the US as well and across the world.

 

Because the big organization that help to put it all together, including the Royal Institute of International Affairs and Council on Foreign Relations, was all for that at the time, and still on the go today pushing the world agenda. You can never forget the past. And don’t ever think it cannot happen anywhere else. Don’t ever, EVER think that, because the same people who run the Soviet system, and they had a lot of them, are granddaughters and grandsons, they’re over in the US in powerful positions today. Don’t forget that. And that can certainly happen today.

 

But Pravda, of all places, of all newspapers, are telling the Americans to “never give up your guns.” This guy goes through some of the history of Russia into the Bolshevik Revolution. But he says that everybody had guns and so on and they were heavily armed during the Czars times, and then once the Reds came in and manage to take over, then they simply called all those people in who still had fire arms, under the guise of registering, but they never walked out of the buildings. That’s well documented, that; they’d take them into basements and shot them in the head. So don’t ever forget for a minute that things are different or more, so called, civilized today. They are not. It’s the same agenda going on and it’s a world agenda. Don’t forget that. This guy says that, the well-armed population was what allowed the various white factions that fought against the Reds, as they called them, or these guys that came in from Germany and the States, that were called the Reds, as I say, they were disarmed after the war, etc., etc., and then slaughtered by the millions. Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix talking about Russia, what happened in Russia. This is from Pravda as it goes through some of their history and how the so-called Reds – most of the Reds as you know it didn’t come from Russia. They were brought in from Germany, and they weren’t Germans to an extent.  And they brought them from the US, and they weren’t US to an extent. They were sent over and heavily financed by the big bankers, especially in the US and in London. It says here…

 

Americans never give up your guns

english.pravda.ru / 28.12.2012 / Stanislav Mishin

 

Moscow fell, for example, not from a lack of weapons to defend it, but from the lying guile of the Reds. Ten thousand Reds took Moscow and were opposed only by some few hundreds of officer cadets and their instructors. (Alan:  Then of course, as I say, they eventually killed them all, they slaughtered the whole bunch of them because they wouldn’t give up their weapons.) Even then the battle was fierce and losses high. However, in the city alone, at that time, lived over 30,000 military officers (both active and retired), all with their own issued weapons and ammunition, plus tens of thousands of other citizens who were armed. The Soviets promised to leave them all alone if they did not intervene. They did not and for that were asked afterwards to come register themselves and their weapons: where they were promptly shot.

 

Of course being savages, murderers and liars does not mean being stupid and the Reds learned from their Civil War experience. One of the first things they did was to disarm the population. From that point, mass repression, mass arrests, mass deportations, mass murder, mass starvation were all a safe game for the powers that were.

 

(A:  When I was reading that it reminded me of a lot of articles, and old footage that I’ve seen as well. Because what they did then too, was to take out the farmers, in Russia, and it reminded me of what was happening across the Western world too, in Canada and the US, with all of their ongoing farm policies run by government as they close down farms one after the other. Because corporate farms only will be the ones of the future; that’s the big idea.  This is the nouveau Soviet Union, you understand, for the whole world.  Some of these farmers did have weapons, general shotguns; you can see them holding off these soldiers. Of course they were blown up eventually, but they thought it was worth dying for to hold onto all they had. That’s all they had, you know; apart from that they would have probably been killed if they had given themselves up anyway. But there was forceful starvation. And if you think forceful starvation will not come you’d better think again. Because they’ve said at the United Nations that food has always been used as a tool in war. And believe you me, they’ll use it again, worldwide, now that five corporations have the world’s food supply in their hands. This is an updated form, this is a more superior form, where the Soviet system was supposed to go. It’s running us all now, for those who haven’t caught on to it. And it’s run by the same people.) The worst they had to fear was a pitchfork in the guts or a knife in the back or the occasional hunting rifle. Not much for soldiers.

 

To this day, with the Soviet Union now dead 21 years, with a whole generation born and raised to adulthood without the SU, we are still denied our basic and traditional rights to self defense. Why? We are told that everyone would just start shooting each other and crime would be everywhere....but criminals are still armed and still murdering and too often, especially in the far regions, those criminals wear the uniforms of the police. (A:  Now again, have you seen the police, especially in the States, recently, and in Britain too for that matter? They’re not police anymore. They are paramilitary organizations, that are dressed like the military, they’re trained like the military.)   The fact that everyone would start shooting is also laughable when statistics are examined.

 

While President Putin pushes through reforms, the local authorities, especially in our vast hinterland, do not feel they need to act like they work for the people. They do as they please, a tyrannical class who knows they have absolutely nothing to fear from a relatively unarmed population. This in turn breeds not respect but absolute contempt and often enough, criminal abuse.

 

For those of us fighting for our traditional rights, the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room. Governments will use the excuse of trying to protect the people from maniacs and crime, but are in reality, it is the bureaucrats protecting their power and position. In all cases where guns are banned, gun crime continues and often increases. As for maniacs, be it nuts with cars (NYC, Chapel Hill NC), swords (Japan), knives (China) or home made bombs (everywhere), insane people strike. (A:  And it’s true, they’ll always strike. In Britain not too long ago a guy was just found guilty, a taxi driver, of running down a bunch a guys he had had a tiff with in his car, so he run them all down. It doesn’t matter what you use.) They throw acid (Pakistan, UK), they throw fire bombs (France), they attack. What is worse, is, that the best way to stop a maniac is not psychology or jail or "talking to them", it is a bullet in the head (A:  In other words, they’re crazy.), that is why they are a maniac, because they are incapable of living in reality or stopping themselves.

 

The excuse that people will start shooting each other is also plain and silly. So it is our politicians saying that our society is full of incapable adolescents who can never be trusted? Then, please explain how we can trust them or the police, who themselves grew up and came from the same culture? 

 

And that’s a very, very good question to ask.  You understand, look at the… I’ve got articles here from all the failed SWAT raids where they raided the wrong places and shot everybody; there’s just too many to count now, in the States. But many of the things that he’s talking about are already… You understand, you’ve got to understand how to put things together. In the Soviet system, as it was brought in, what happened in its horrific history, the countries they took over as well, because they were all for world government as well, remember, and how they slaughtered and starved Hungarians and Ukrainians to death, by the millions.  They took all of their seed off them and left them to starve, while they sold the grain abroad for more cash.  But it didn’t go to the people, by the way; it went to the top creeps that had taken over this whole system, these foreigners.  Don’t forget that for a second. And even for the ones shouting for confiscation, etc. in the US, you’d better look into their histories, because many of them are descended from the people who took over Russia. For those who haven’t looked into the history of them, you’d better start looking now into your histories, very quickly.

 

This article here too, tonight, and Diane Feinstein. That’s interesting too, where her parents came from, and her whole history since of course. But I’ll put up the video where Diane Feinstein talks about the fact that she is armed and she’s got a carrier permit. But she doesn’t want you to have one, just like Russia. You see. So I’ll put that one up tonight too, that YouTube on her.

 

Dianne Feinstein Gun Control Hypocrite - youtube.com / Jan 3, 2013

 

You’ve got to understand as well, you’ve got to really look at all of your governments, what you think are your nations. They’re not your governments at all. They’ve never been your governments, for a long, long time. They’ve all been taken over. They’re all on board with this world agenda, and they’ve created chaos across the planet under the guise of stopping terrorism. Here’s an article here and it says…

 

West uses delisted MKO terrorists to achieve certain objectives:

 Iranian MP

presstv.com / Jan 4, 2013

 

An Iranian lawmaker says the US and Canada move to take the Mujahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO) off the list of terrorist organizations (A:  You see, so these are classed as terrorist organizations going around blowing people up across the planet… and they’ve delisted them as a terrorist organization because they’re going to use them against Iran. Who’s the good guys? Who are the good guys and bad guys here? Do you understand? When you start using crooks and criminals and terrorists, because you’ve got your own foreign-policy, and it’s not your foreign-policy, it’s the guys who rule over you; it’s their foreign-policy.) is in line with the West’s policy to use the group in order to achieve certain objectives in the region.

 

“The move by the Canadian and the US governments to remove the MKO from the list of terrorist organizations is in line with Western countries’ support of this group in order to use its remaining members for achieving their meddlesome and aggressive political and economic objectives in the region,” Mohammad-Hassan Asafari, a member of Majlis (parliament) National Security and Foreign Policy Committee, said Friday.

 

He said that the group was nurtured by Washington and added the US government’s terrorist nature in the region requires that it financially and militarily support terrorist groups like MKO, Taliban and al-Qaeda.  (A:  And it’s true, our own tax money has been funding so-called terrorist organizations, including the one who supposedly was responsible for starting all of this 9/11 stuff to the present time. We’re funding them with money and weapons, and using them to take down other countries. You got to question everything now… EVERYTHING.)

 

Asafari said that Iran will reconsider its political, economic and cultural relations with any country that would shelter the group, adding that MKO members must be extradited to the Islamic Republic.

 

On December 20, the Canadian government removed the MKO from its official list of terrorist organizations. Ottawa’s move followed similar measures by the US and EU.

 

The US formally removed the MKO from its list of terror organizations on September 28. The European Union had taken the MKO off its black list in 2009.

 

The MKO is responsible for numerous acts of terror and violence against Iranian civilians and officials.

 

The group fled to Iraq in 1986, where it received the support of Iraq's executed dictator Saddam Hussein and set up its camp near the Iranian border.

 

Out of the nearly 17,000 Iranians killed in terrorist attacks since the victory of the Islamic Revolution in 1979, almost 12,000 have fallen victim to the acts of terror carried out by the MKO.

 

The group also sided with Saddam during Iraq’s eight-year imposed war against the Islamic Republic. It is also known to have cooperated with Saddam in suppressing the 1991 uprisings in southern Iraq and the massacre of Iraqi Kurds.  (A:  So our governments are backing these guys. It’s not our government, as I say, though, is it?  You understand, your governments were gone a long, long, long time ago. And you’re following almost an alien agenda here; I don’t mean from outer space either.)

 

And in the Washington Post it says…

 

Renditions continue under Obama, despite due-process concerns

washingtonpost.com / Craig Whitlock / January 1, 2013

 

 The three European men with Somali roots were arrested on a murky pretext in August as they passed through the small African country of Djibouti. But the reason soon became clear when they were visited in their jail cells by a succession of American interrogators.

 

U.S. agents accused the men — two of them Swedes, the other a longtime resident of Britain — of supporting al-Shabab, an Islamist militia in Somalia that Washington considers a terrorist group. Two months after their arrest, the prisoners were secretly indicted by a federal grand jury in New York, then clandestinely taken into custody by the FBI and flown to the United States to face trial. 

 

So this is rendition that’s still on the go, folks. They go on to what’s happened to these guys since. So the US is kidnapping people, no matter… even in Africa, you know. One country to the next, just grab them, fly them out, kidnap them, and often that’s the last that’s heard of them. And you’re supposed to support an honorable government like that? When a government has no honor, it’s evident. It’s only not evident if you’ve been brainwashed by especially the media and entertainment, because entertainment works; it’s part of the Military Industrial Complex. 

 

Now I also have Madeline Albright, I think it was her granddad – it was either her dad or her granddad – who was an awfully good friend of Stalin, who said that he would set up the Green Party and when the Soviet system would change and merge with the West, this Green Party would push a new environmentalism, to push through all the communist techniques. Back with more after this break.

 

Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix and talking about the Green Party and its foundations and so on. They knew, you see, they’d have to change their tactics to bring in a bigger world, for communism, without knowing it was communism.  The techniques to do it was to get power over the peoples of the world through their governments, by getting IN to governments and then stressing, save the environment, save the environment and all of these kind of things, which eventually comes right down to individual taxes on you and individual inspections of your home, etc. You’re going into communism in a sense and you don’t even realize that this is what it’s all about.  In fact, they used that technique in the Soviet Union. Everybody had to go and work in the fields, except the Politburo’s own children and so on, to get in touch with mother earth and all that, to appreciate where food came from, etc., because you wouldn’t see much of it if you were a peasant; in the future, you’d certainly appreciate it.  But this says…

 

Oxford Professor: “Greens In Denial…Desperate To Believe In Renewable Energy…Obsessed With Climate Change”

notrickszone.com /  Gosselin / 3. January 2013

 

(A:  You see, climate change is part of this whole green thing, you see. It’s the same stuff as they used in the Soviet Union. When something sounds nutty and crazy, and what’s it got to do with global warming, etc., there’s a different agenda at work here. That’s why it sounds absurd. And there really is a massive agenda at work, you’ve got understand that; it’s not the topics they’re giving you. In the Soviet Union, near its end, the taxi drivers in Moscow and other cities were only allowed to do so many kilometers per month, by law. They had to eventually jack up their cars and turn their wheels back to get the odometer to go back, to change back their kilometer mileage, you know, their milometer, in order to get gas. Otherwise Moscow would have come to a standstill. There’s videos up there with the old guys talking about it, at the time. They’re mad, you see, at the top and they want to drive YOU mad as well. Because when you’re mad you start to wonder about your own common sense and your own... can you trust yourself? Am I mad or… I just can’t get what they’re really driving at so it must be my fault. This is a technique to make you lose confidence in yourself.)

 

Benny Peiser alerts us to this excellent feature story brought to you by the UK Spectator on the wildlife devastation being wrought by “climate-friendly wind turbines”.

 

The story just goes to show you how little the environmentalist thought these things out:  (A:  No, they’ve thought it all out, they don’t care about killing birds. They’re not really environmentalists; that’s just the fronts.)

 

1. Wind turbines don’t produce that much electricity.

2. They run on average only at about 20% of their rated capacity.

3. Their lifetimes are turning out to be only half of what was promised.

4. They are turning the landscape into a panoramic eyesore.  (A:  Never mind the noise it creates; it drives all the wildlife away, except the birds that just fly right into them.)

5. Now, we see they are killing birds and bats by the millions.

 

Recall how environmentalists like to think they are intellectually superior to everyone else, and that they rarely make mistakes. At worst, they only have to “adjust” their ideas at times. This assumed intellectual superiority is what drives them. (A:  Actually, it’s a cultural thing; it’s almost inbred with them.) 

 

Well, it now looks like they got some major adjusting to do with their thinking. But I suppose this windmill carnage will be too much for them to cope with, and so they’ll go on denying it and act like they’re rescuing the climate.

 

How can we expect them to understand the complexities of climate when they can’t even think more than one step ahead?

 

We saw the same pattern of behaviour with the communists and their economics. Did they change course? Except for China, (A:  ...because we funded China, and created China by the way, modern China, the West did.) they all obstinately stayed in acute denial until everything around them collapsed. Expect the same from the kook-green, drugged-up-on-climate-protectionism European governments and media.  (A:  Now, they’ve already said at the top, and many of the top players in this whole climate thing, that they don’t care about the science being bogus. They don’t care. This is the redistribution of wealth and control over the peoples of the world. This is what it’s for. And I’ve read the articles here from their own quotes before. And this is what it’s all about. They don’t care about killing birds. They don’t care about bankrupting you, paying for all of this stuff.  Because they work with the bankers; it’s all one big happy family.)

 

Clive Hambler writes (emphasis added):

 

Though I started out neutral on renewable energy, I’ve since seen the havoc wreaked on wildlife by wind power, hydro power, biofuels and tidal barrages. The environmentalists who support such projects do so for ideological reasons. What few of them have in their heads, though, is the consolation of science.”  (A:  ...the facts, in other words.)

 

One has to wonder which species is more intelligent: birds or environmentalist kooks?

 

I’ve heard it suggested that birds will soon adapt to avoid turbine blades. (A:  ...because we’re all evolving, you know, all this adaptation stuff and all that.) But your ability to learn something when you’ve been whacked on the head by an object travelling at 200 mph is limited.”

 

I seriously doubt that green-kooks are any more capable of learning.  (A:  Well, they’re not. The guys at the top know it’s all a con; they know the real purpose of it all. A lot of the followers, no, because they’ve been brainwashed in the schools, you see.  So again, this is from an Oxford professor, “Greens are in Denial.”  I’ll put this up tonight too, all these articles I’ll put up at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the broadcast.)

 

Wind farms vs wildlife - spectator.co.uk / Clive Hambler / 5 January 2013

 

Now, we’re all just – I’ve said this for many, many years – we’re just human resources, and it’s good that other people are picking up on that and running with it. Also, that we are renewable resources, because we breed ourselves, you see; we’re just like trees and everything else.  That’s why when you go for a job you go to the Department of Human Resources, you know, if you are human that is. And we are despised by those at the top, who now truly believe that there are too many of you type below, and the majority are you types, you see. In countries where they have a firm grip on corruption, where corruption is rampant, like India for instance, they can get away with literally murder. I’ll come back and talk about Pharma killing people over there, testing drugs on the Indian peasantry. Back with more after this.

 

Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and we’re talking about countries like India where corruption is so easy to get away with and everybody at the top is in on the corruption. The ones at the top in the caste system really look down at the ones at the bottom, of having no value at all, except for their value as a human resource. Again, because you are an economic unit under this world system, your whole function is to work and produce, get taxed, to keep the elite in a very good lifestyle at the top, and have all of their wars and things, and hire lots of cops to keep you in your place. That’s the way it is, folks.

 

Anyway, the drug companies of course went into India quite a few years ago and they’ve been doing trials of experimental vaccines and drugs and so on, and pills, on people because they can get away with it there. No one asks any questions. They lie to the people there and tell them, we’re here to help you. Understand, that’s how they got inoculations and vaccinations into the West, the same techniques, we’re here to help you… it’s for YOU. Then we end up having all of these diseases down the road, we get cancers galore. They admit from the Salk trials in experiments, there was hundreds of foreign simian viruses, live viruses in every polio shot, for instance. We know also that India, parts of India and parts of Africa, just last year I read the article from the United Nations World Health Organization admitting that they had created a new kind of, a new type, a new variety of polio by giving this special inhalation type polio to people in India and Africa. What happened was, it rapidly altered itself, evolved you might call it, and became something that they can’t treat anymore. They gave them this deliberately, because it was cheaper; this is the claim that they gave. But they gave them this polio mist inhaler and they ended up creating a new more virulent strain of polio than ever before, in regions where they’d never had polio before. You’ve got to question everything, don’t you?  Anyway, it says…

 

Report: 211 die during drugs trials in India

nbcnews.com / NBC News staff

 

The Times said that in 2011 some 438 cases of serious adverse events were reported, with 16 later found to be due to clinical drugs trials.

 

India’s Central Drugs Standard Control Organization has now proposed ways to reduce the number of problems and a new formula for compensation, the paper reported.

 

Compensation is currently decided “according to the will” of the drug company, the Times added. Previous compensation payments of families of people who died during trials amounted to just a few dollars.

 

(A:  Now listen to this...  Here’s how you’re weighed up in the scales for your value to society...)   "When a 70-year-old patient who is terminally ill dies during a clinical trial due to an adverse reaction of the drug, the compensation should be less than that given to a 22-year-old man in the first stage of the same disease who dies of the same drug," a CDSCO official told the paper.

 

"The youth could be the sole bread-winner of the family and would have lived longer but for the adverse drug reaction. So, the guidelines quantify accordingly who should get how much compensation. At present, both could get the same amount and it could be abysmally low if decided by the pharmaceutical company,” the official added.  (A:  But I’ll tell you one thing, this official and all the other officials over there are on the take from big Pharma, to get away with what they’re doing. I mean, this has been going on for quite a few years now. We’re all disposable, you understand, and in some countries it’s easier to be disposable because no one asks any questions. And they still don’t tell the peasantry that they did it.)

 

Now, I’ve always said that celebrities are something to avoid to an extent. Because understand, for instance, in Hollywood every celebrity is given a cause.  Everybody must have a cause and a favorite charity, you understand; that’s traditional with Hollywood. I’ve gone through the history of Hollywood before; you should read the history of Hollywood for yourselves. Again, it’s part of this whole Military-Industrial Complex, which is left-wing – I’m being polite by calling it left-wing. It gives you all of your thoughts and your behavior. In psychology, when they go back through history of even aggression in children, do you understand, they actually say that children go through scripts. The script is how you feel and how you react at a certain time because of what you’ve been watching on TV. They call it your script. As you get a year older and you watch a different kind of stuff, maybe more violence, more sex, whatever, then that becomes your new script. These are psychological terms, and it all comes from you watching television, folks. It’s one of the most important things there is for controlling culture and altering culture, and destroying culture. Anyway…

 

Baywatch Star: Rewire Human Biology For One-Child Families

explosivereports.com / Jurriaan Maessen / January 4, 2013

 

Baywatch “star” Alexandra Paul recently spoke at a TEDX conference, calling not only for a total rewiring of human biology “to recognize the benefits of a one-child family”, but also for the global human population to be brought down to two billion- a 75% reduction compared to current levels.

 

Paul, who starred in over 70 films and television shows, explicitly states that the entire modern-day culture should serve to convince people to “rewire biology” so that the natural urge to procreate will be changed into a rational, “eco-friendly” one, aspiring to just one child per family.

 

“Will it (world population) stop growing because of famine, disease, or war over resources- or will it stop growing because people choose to have smaller families- and by smaller families I mean one-child families.”

 

Although Paul stresses that “forcing people to have fewer children does not work”, she does emphasize that modern culture (A:  Now listen... modern culture....) should be moulded in such a way as to convince people that we have to “change and rewire our biology and our culture to recognize the benefits of a one-child family.”

 

As a culture we need to emphasize the benefits of having a one-child family so people will choose to have fewer kids [children].”, she stated.

 

The Baywatch-”star” explains why she has chosen to not have kids [children]:  (A:  She probably won’t tell you the real reason, you know.)

 

Quoting UN population projections, she advocates a fairly massive reduction in human numbers compared to current levels:

 

“The number of humans on earth needs to go down. And I believe it needs to go down to two billion.”, she said.  (A:  Now, who told her all that, hmm?)

 

She closed her anti-human speech by calling on her listening audience to take her words to heart and quit reproducing after the first child:

 

(A:  ...and the usual stuff…) “Let’s be part of the solution, (A:  ...etc, etc. ) . . .

 

So you understand, the culture industry... and they call themselves down there the culture creators. But it’s true, because everyone is copying what they see. Again, you have a particular persona and insight into yourself at a time, that’s actually a script that you’ve been given by what you watch. You start copying the behavior of what you watch.  You know I could go through hours of psychology for you. I can go hours, days and weeks and months of psychology and psychodynamics for you and how it all works. You know something, you’ll turn on the TV next, about an hour later and you forget it all just like that.  Just, poof, gone.

 

Zbigniew Brzezinski in the Washington Post says…

 

Iran should be key topic at hearings

washingtonpost.com / Zbigniew Brzezinski / January 3, 2013

 

It is to be hoped that the forthcoming Senate Foreign Relations Committee and Armed Services Committee hearings regarding the president’s nominations for secretary of state and secretary of defense produce a wide-ranging debate regarding this country’s role in today’s very unsettled world. The hearings almost certainly will provoke searching questions regarding the strategic wisdom of potential U.S. military action against Iran. Recent Israeli media reports have cited a former member of President Obama’s National Security Council staff predicting a U.S. attack by about midyear.

 

It is essential that the issue of war or peace with Iran be fully vented, especially with the U.S. national interest in mind. Although the president has skillfully avoided a specific commitment to military action by a certain date, the absence of a negotiated agreement with Iran regarding its compliance with the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. . . .

 

Well, they keep letting the guys in to check them and they’ve never found anything that they’re making weaponry. So it won’t matter. It won’t matter if they pull down their drawers and show them their asses; they’re going to go to war with these people. That’s on the agenda. That was on the same list of PNAC, Project for the New American Century group in the 90s. All these countries that they’ve taken out were on that list, and that’s like the law of Moses, it’s just stamped in stone. That’s how it’s going to be, folks. Tonight too I’ll put up a link to the history of the PNAC, that’s the Project for the New American Century, which isn’t American at all by the way. But it’s to use America, by others. I’ll put that up tonight as well for you to have a perusal.

 

Project for a New American Century - bibliotecapleyades.net

 

Another article is to do with pedophilia. I said when the Jimmy Savile stuff all broke out, and long before Jimmy Savile came along I said, eventually there will be no more such a thing as pedophilia; it will be off the books.  And that’s the push that comes out of this. And what I said what would come out of the Savile thing, it won’t be anything that you expect. Because it’s not to put these guys away or stop it. It’s to have a new look at pedophilia, does it really harm anybody? And I’m not kidding. I said this years ago, years ago. It says…

 

Paedophilia: bringing dark desires to light

guardian.co.uk / Jon Henley /2 January 2013

 

The Jimmy Savile scandal caused public revulsion, but experts disagree about what causes paedophilia - and even how much harm it causes.  (A:  You see.)

 

There is little agreement about paedophilia, even among those considered experts on the subject. (A:  What, are they pedophiles or something, to be experts on the subject?)

 

In 1976 the National Council for Civil Liberties, the respectable (and responsible) pressure group now known as Liberty, made a submission to parliament's criminal law revision committee. It caused barely a ripple. "Childhood sexual experiences, willingly engaged in with an adult," it read, "result in no identifiable damage … (A:  Now, I’ve talked to you before about these people and what the real agenda is. It’s to destroy your cultures totally. All these councils and so on that look into rights and civil liberties, are there to destroy your cultures. And then THEY become the dominant minority, folks, because they’ve got rid of yours. Then they rule you, just like they did in the Soviet Union.) The real need is a change in the attitude which assumes that all cases of paedophilia result in lasting damage."

 

It is difficult today, after the public firestorm unleashed by revelations about Jimmy Savile and the host of child abuse allegations they have triggered, to imagine any mainstream group making anything like such a claim. But if it is shocking to realise how dramatically attitudes to paedophilia have changed in just three decades, it is even more surprising to discover how little agreement there is even now among those who are considered experts on the subject.

 

A liberal professor of psychology who studied in the late 1970s will see things very differently from someone working in child protection, or with convicted sex offenders. There is, astonishingly, not even a full academic consensus on whether consensual paedophilic relations necessarily cause harm.  (A:  Well remember too, that a pedophile GROOMS his victim, to be the WHORE, and that’s generally what they stay for their whole lives afterwards. They know this at the top.)

 

So what, then, do we know? A paedophile is someone who has a primary or exclusive sexual interest in prepubescent children. Savile appears to have been primarily an ephebophile (A:  ...they call it.), defined as someone who has a similar preferential attraction to adolescents, though there have been claims one of his victims was aged eight.  (A:  There was more than one of his victims aged eight or below.)

 

But not all paedophiles are child molesters, and vice versa: by no means every paedophile acts on his impulses, and many people who sexually abuse children are not exclusively or primarily sexually attracted to them. In fact, "true" paedophiles are estimated by some experts to account for only 20% of sexual abusers. (A:  It goes much higher if you get away from these ‘some experts’, you see.  See how the wording is done? ...to make you start thinking, oh you know, it’s a small minority…) Nor are paedophiles necessarily violent: no firm links have so far been established between paedophilia and aggressive or psychotic symptoms. (A:  Now as I say, they groom them, they give them the candy and they tell them little stories and stuff, and they get into their little world with them, and then they start their little intrusive behavior. They can take months, sometimes years to groom them. That’s part of what they like, is this grooming, you see; they get off on it. So they don’t have to be aggressive, and these experts know this as well.) Psychologist Glenn Wilson, co-author of The Child-Lovers: a Study of Paedophiles in Society, argues that "The majority of paedophiles, however socially inappropriate, seem to be gentle and rational."  (A:  No kidding, folks, they’re ‘gentle and rational’ people… They just leave a wake of hell behind them of wrecked people.)

 

Legal definitions of paedophilia, needless to say, have no truck with such niceties, focusing on the offence, not the offender. The Sex Offenders Act 1997 defined paedophilia as a sexual relationship between an adult over 18 and a child below 16.  (A:  They’ve changed all that now too.)

 

There is much more we don't know, including how many paedophiles there are: 1-2% of men is a widely accepted figure, but Sarah Goode, honorary research fellow at the University of Winchester and author of two major 2009 and 2011 sociological studies on paedophilia in society, says the best current estimate – based on possibly flawed science – is that "one in five of all adult men are, to some degree, capable of being sexually aroused by children". (A:  I kind of doubt that... ‘based on possibly flawed science’ – don’t forget that part before you read the rest.) Even less is known about female paedophiles (A:  Actually tonight I’ll put up one on some of the female pedophiles in the US. Because it’s to do with the serotonin reuptake inhibitors that they got all the youngsters on today and a lot of the adults as well.  And the list of female teachers that are on this stuff, who are now engaged in sexual activity with young boys, and it’s just astronomical. Astronomical. Anyway, so they know a lot about female pedophiles.) thought to be responsible for maybe 5% of abuse against pre-pubescent children in the UK. 

 

http://www.ssristories.com/index.php?p=teacher

 

Debate still rages, too, about the clinical definition of paedophilia. Down the years, the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders – "the psychiatrist's bible" (A:  ...as they call it.) – has variously classified it as a sexual deviation, a sociopathic condition and a non-psychotic medical disorder. And few agree about what causes it. Is paedophilia innate or acquired? Research at the sexual behaviours clinic of Canada's Centre for Addiction and Mental Health suggests paedophiles' IQs are, on average, 10% lower than those of sex offenders who had abused adults, and that paedophiles are significantly less likely to be right-handed (A:  [Alan chuckles.] They go into this eugenics all the time.) than the rest of the population, suggesting a link to brain development. (A:  That’s really going to be good news for all the left-handed guys, isn’t it? They’ll be terrified now.) MRI scans reveal a possible issue with paedophiles' "white matter" (A:  ...in the brain.  Now, this is neuroscience coming into law, you understand, they’ve already got psychopaths off with committing horrific offenses in the States and other countries. Because they’ve got to legitimize themselves as a science; they’ve got to become legitimate. This is how they’re doing it.  They’re getting into all these areas, and saying, these people can’t help it, you see this bit of white matter in their brain, it might be that that’s the problem. It MIGHT be, you know. Of course 99% might not be at all, that little part of the brain. But you see, they’ve got to try and verify a science with very obscure facts, if they’re facts at all, for that matter. So this is where they’re going with it, you see.) . . .

 

This is radical stuff. But there is a growing conviction, notably in Canada, that paedophilia should probably be classified as a distinct sexual orientation, like heterosexuality or homosexuality. (A:  You understand, homosexuals started it, you see, then lesbians, well actually lesbians came before homosexuals in the pressure groups and then we’ve got LGBT and a few other ones at the end, you know, that I haven’t really caught up on what they are yet.) Two eminent researchers testified to that effect to a Canadian parliamentary commission last year, and the Harvard Mental Health Letter of July 2010 stated baldly that paedophilia "is a sexual orientation" and therefore "unlikely to change".  (A:  So, see, it’s their right, it’s a sexual orientation, to diddle little children. I’ll also put up the Canadian bill, you see, to change it all too, with these so-called experts. I’ll also put that up tonight as well for those who want to have a look at it.)

 

Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights

www.parl.gc.ca/HousePublications/Publication.aspx?DocId=4959361&Language=E&Mode=1

 

So eventually there will be no such thing as pedophilia; it will be another sexual orientation. Then down the road, it’s true, rapists are already trying this, the same tactic: ‘you know, seriously, we’re attracted, we get excited when we rape someone’. This is how it’s going, folks. And the ones at the top are pushing all this because your culture must be totally annihilated. Remember, I talked so many times about the guys who came in with their particular schools of thought into the West from the East. Back with more after this.

 

Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through The Matrix.  I was talking about pedophilia being normalized, by experts, you see, who have an agenda to destroy your culture. Again, go into your history books, look at the Macy group, look at the Frankfurt school that were brought into the US and Britain and elsewhere, to destroy the cultures of the West, to make it safe for other people. I’m not kidding you, you can read their own literature; they tell you why they were doing it all. And they were given governmental permission to go ahead and teach this, and change your culture, through universities and so on; it’s still taught today.  Remember, Adorno, who worked with the Frankfurt school, said that, we must destroy the cultures of the West, totally, down to beyond necrophilia, before we’ll be finished, he said. And that’s what you’ve got working, folks, the same agenda.

 

And...

Bilderberg-picked EU Leader Van Rompuy Calls for

Global Governance With Russia

thenewamerican.com /27 December 2012 /William F. Jasper

 

(A:  This has been out for a few days but it says…)

 

While much of the Christian and post-Christian worlds were busy rushing about in last-minute preparations for Christmas celebrations, an important event took place in Brussels, Belgium, that went largely unnoticed and unreported. Leaders of the European Union and Russia met in Brussels on December 20 and 21 for the 30th EU-Russia Summit (A:  Did you know they had a 30th EU–Russia Summit?  Hmm?), continuing a process of convergence and interdependence that is leading toward political, economic, and social merger.  (A:  Look up ‘merger’, folks.)

 

In his remarks at the conclusion of the summit, Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council, made repeated reference to progress toward the goal of “global governance,” which has always been code in globalist circles for world government. Van Rompuy stated:

 

By working together, the EU and Russia can make a decisive contribution to global governance and regional conflict resolution, to global economic governance in the G 8 and G 20, (A:  This is communism, folks, if you don’t get it. Economic governance… this is communism. In the G8 and G20…) and to a broad range of international and regional issues. I would like to congratulate President Putin for taking over the presidency of G 20.

 

As we have reported in this magazine many times, the term “global governance” is an intentionally deceptive term, used by political ruling elites because it is more vague and mushy and sounds less threatening than “global government” or “world government.” Hence, there will be less political opposition mounted to “global governance” than “world government.”  (A:  So I’ll put that up tonight as well, all of these links I’ll put up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com at the end of the broadcast.)

 

And also...

 

Spain Plunders 90% Of Social Security Fund To Buy Its Own Debt

 zerohedge.com / 01/03/2013

 

...from the shysters.  Because shysters are running the world now, openly. They’ve collapsed economies. We pay them off with all of our tax money and go into further debt, to them, by doing so. Economic warfare is much better than anything else, you understand.

 

And this article here too...

 

UK embassy in Kabul inspects visitors like criminals

presstv.ir / Dec 29, 2012

 

The British Embassy in Kabul has installed an electronic orifice scanner, (A:  How’s that, folks? There’s how you get treated now.) which is used in high-security prisons, in order to ensure that there are no weapons inside visitors’ bodies.

 

Recent visitors to the UK Embassy said they were asked to sit in an "electric chair", which detects hidden metal inside the body by using magnetic sensors, The Telegraph reported.

 

"There was a big grey chair inside the guard hut at one of the entrances which the Gurkhas (A:  The Gurkhas are a regiment used by Britain.) said visitors had to sit on. No one could really believe it when they said what it was for,” said one visitor.

 

The British government has refused to comment on the issue, fearing that it would be forced to abandon the use of the offensive equipment called the Body Orifice Security Scanner (Boss).  (A:  ...that looks up your bum, folks. And it will come to a place near you, as we go into this great world dictatorship, under world government. That’s where they test it first, in a different country, you see.)

 

From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you. 

 

 

Topics of show covered in following links:

 

Pravda Warns US to "Never Give up Your Guns"

Dianne Feinstein is Armed

West Delists Terror Organization for Use against Iran

Renditions Continue under Obama

Oxford Professor--"Greens in Denial"

Wind Farms Slaughtering Birds

211 People Die in Drug Trials in India

Baywatch "Star" Speaks at TEDX Conference Calling for Total Rewiring of Human Biology to Have only One-Child Families

Zbigniew Brzezinski wants Iran to be Key Topic at Senate Hearings

Project for the New American Century

Paedophilia ---Incremental Normalization

Female Teachers on SSRI Drugs Having Affairs with Minors

Canada and Paedophilia Laws

EU and Russia for Global Governance-

Spain Plunders Own Social Security Fund to Buy its Own Debt from Global Shysters

UK Embassy in Kabul uses Electronic Chair for Visitors---Digital Orifice Scanner