November 13, 2012 (#1214)

Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:


Poem Copyright Alan Watt Nov. 13, 2012:

The Programme that Updates the Programmed:

"New Laws Come Down Daily, All Despicable,
Living Through Agenda, Published, Predictable,
The "Path to Civilization" is Really Brutal,
But Then the System is Still Really Feudal,
A Large Dose of Communism Muddies the View
Of Totalitarianism Run by Elite Few,
Lots of Scientists on Board to Steer Us,
Without Brainwashing They'd Really Fear Us,
Yet Brainwashed We Are, Look Around and See
Facts Weaved with Fiction, They Believe in TV"
© Alan Watt Nov. 13, 2012

Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Nov. 13, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
alternate sites:  ,   .us  ,   .ca

mirror site:
European site includes all audios & downloadable TRANSCRIPTS in European languages for print up:

Information for purchasing Alan’s books, CDs, DVDs and DONATIONS:

Canada and AmericaPayPal, Cash, personal checks &
 for the US, INTERNATIONAL postal money orders / for Canada, INTERNAL postal money orders
 (America:  Postal Money orders - Stress the INTERNATIONAL pink one, not the green internal one.)

Outside the AmericasPayPal, Cash, Western Union and Money Gram
(Money Gram is cheaper; even cheaper is a Money Gram check – in Canadian dollars:

 mail via the postal services worldwide.)

Send a separate email along with the donation (list your order, name and address)

Click the link below for your location (ordering info):
USA        Canada        Europe/Scandinavian        All Other Countries


Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on November the 13th, 2012.

For newcomers, help yourself to the website, You’ll find lots of audios for free download, where I go through the system you’re born into. It’s a very deceptive system. And it’s really scientifically run, through your education (your initial indoctrination) and then it’s followed up by entertainment. It’s even in children’s books and so on. You’re living through a planned change, a planned society and you’re downloaded really with ideas of the new value systems that are given to you, generation by generation, and by that I don’t mean twenty years or eighty years... I mean, literally, every year they step it up and step it up and step it up because these are the changes which you are taught to experience as being normal, that will happen throughout your life, step by step. So, you’re truly living through a planned society. You’re living through a script in fact. The globalization, all of this stuff is all part of it. And the con of climate change, etc, to create a new type of economy, and more than that, a new kind of massive police force to come down on every single person, to guide you through your entire life, under the eco-fascist system they’re bringing in. That’s what it’s really all about. They’ve tried other things before that didn’t work, but this one will work because it’s all set up and running already, with hundreds and hundreds and hundreds of international organizations already involved, including your town councils.

So, help yourself to the audios and so on. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. You can help me keep going by buying the books and discs at and donating, as well. And from the US to Canada, remember, you can use a personal check or international postal money order. You can send cash or use PayPal. And across the world: Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal. Straight donations really, really are awfully welcome in these austere times, especially when Canada is ahead of most countries with its excise taxations and its value-added tax called the GST; things like that and of course, inflation, which they like to call “quantitative easing.” So, we’re going through massive changes. It’s not just changes to do with work and labor; it’s to do also with cultural values. Massive cultural changes happening, as you well can see, all over the place. You know what’s politically correct and whatever is politically correct is the mandate that you must believe or else you’ll be fined or put in prison for saying something that’s not politically correct. That’s your new free society. When they can’t make folk do it by scientific means (meaning pure indoctrination, repetition), they simply bring out the laws to enforce and make you say all the ‘right’ things (things that your masters want you to say) and have the ‘right’ opinions that your masters have given you, rather than leave it to yourselves and your own observations. So, massive changes are underway. Globalization is not just happy, smiling faces across the sea, all getting along together; it’s to do with literally, destroying all that was, to bring in all that is new (all that was planned to be new), and that’s what you’re living through today. It’s so amazing to just compare it with the old con, which was called “communism,” (which in itself was a front for something else) and how that, when you bring out the Manifesto (the Communist Manifesto), they’ve pretty-well achieved all of the planks of the Communist Manifesto – destruction of the family unit and all right through the whole lot of it basically. It’s been pretty-well done under this new guise of globalism and fairness etc etc etc. And folk have been taught communism in school now, for years, especially in Canada and the States (they can actually take courses in it) and they come out thinking, well, it was a nice little thing, a nice little experiment and it helped the poor folk get ahead. What a joke that was. Twenty-odd million, eighty million folk all together were slaughtered during the whole communist era and believe you me, when you see the same people behind communism as behind the PC stuff of today and globalization, you better be awfully, awfully worried folks, because these guys are ruthless. Back with more after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix and it truly is an incredible matrix, because there’s not a day that goes by that I have to go through screeds and screeds of stuff, information to do with internationalism and big corporations under a thousand different names, all for the same thing, towards globalism, carbon taxes and so on. They’re all set up, you see. They’re all set up. It’s all been done over many years and it comes from the very top, those who really run the world. Remember, the whole idea of globalism came out of the Royal Institute for International Affairs, a private organization, set up by international bankers in London. And their other American branch is the Council on Foreign Relations. They also have branches of the CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) across the whole planet and even their private historian actually mentioned that, because they have an ulterior version of history, the real history, because they’ve been behind so many things, including wars and so on, just like today, in fact, across the Middle East. Nothing happens by itself; everything’s planned years and years ahead of time.

But, getting back to this part here, to do with destroying all that was to make room for the new and this is what they’ve always said. Sometimes they’ve said in the ancient times too, that they would perfect all that was left imperfect, you see and that includes all of you, as well. You’re imperfect; you’re not efficient enough, today.  This article came out in a couple of newspapers a couple of days ago. It says,

“Now Economic Union...”


Alan: That’s the big Soviet parliament they have running the whole of Europe now, with the bankers at the top.

“... Seeks to Ban the Family”


Alan: No kidding. Right out of the Communist Manifesto. It says,

“Brussels takes aim at the Famous Five!  Books portraying ‘traditional’ families could be barred ... Books that reinforce traditional roles can contribute to gender stereotyping,...”


Alan: So, you can imagine the bunch of persons who sat and wrote this.

“... report says. Traditional stories can damage women’s career opportunities, report’s authors says. Books which portray ‘traditional’ images of mothers caring for their children...”


Alan: Well, that’s going out of fashion now today. It’s generally down the toilet.

“... or fathers going out to work could be barred from schools under proposals from Brussels. An EU report claims that ‘gender stereotyping’ in schools influences the perception of the way boys and girls should behave and damages women’s career opportunities in the future. Critics said the proposals for ‘study materials’ to be amended so that men and women are no longer depicted in their traditional roles would mean the withdrawal of children’s classics, such as Enid Blyton’s The Famous Five series, Paddington Bear or Peter Pan.”


Alan: And that’s what the UK Daily Mail said about it, too. And,

“Dominant Social Theme: People need to let other people alone, even if Leviathan itself must be employed to make it happen.”


Alan: That’s what we really need: a Leviathan.

“Free-Market Analysis: Whenever we look, we are assaulted by unbelievable legislative actions. This has got to be the most incredible idea yet: To legislate portrayals of the family out of existence.”


Alan: Ireland just, by the way, and very few folk turned up for the vote, have passed the United Nations’ “Rights of the Child,” which leads, of course, to pedophilia, on behalf of all those who grab the children from them, because I’ve done many articles on this before and the groups behind them that want to abolish the age of consent with children. This is a big, big push and I’ve read the articles over the last couple of weeks on that. So, Ireland’s turned completely red; it used to be nice and green at one time but it’s gone all red now, with the hammer and sickle. And I’ll put up a couple links tonight: one from the Sovereign Independent and another one from another source, as well. But it says here,

“What kinds of people come up with these ideas? What kind of people vote on them? This is not some outlier in North Korea, not some gambit in Mongolia. This initiative is being seriously proposed in the heart of the West, in the supposed cradle of civilization.  These people are not just announcing their intentions to attack the family unit, but to ban by force any mention of it. It’s a little bit like trying to legislate away gravity. Human biology trends towards families. Here’s more from the article:...”


Alan: It says. And it goes on to say:

“The document, prepared by the European Parliament’s Committee on Women’s Rights and Gender Equality, also suggests EU-wide legislation is needed to tackle the way women are depicted in advertising during children’s television programmes. It further complains about the number of women in EU parliaments,...”


Alan: Not enough...

“...and floats the idea of fixed quotas on a minimum proportion of female MPs. The report says: ‘Children are confronted with gender stereotypes at a very young age through television series, television advertisements, study materials and educational programmes, influencing their perception of how male and female characters should behave. ‘Special educational programmes and study materials should therefore be introduced in which men and women are no longer used in examples in their ‘traditional roles’, with the male as the breadwinner of the family and the female as the one who takes care of the children.’ The report adds: ‘With reference to media and advertisement, it must also be noted that unsupervised television viewing among children and youngsters starting at a very early age is on the rise. ‘Negative gender stereotypes can therefore have a significant influence on young women’s confidence and self-esteem, particularly on teenagers, resulting in a restriction of their aspirations, choices and possibilities for future career possibilities.’ The document calls on the European Commission to ‘take the issue of gender equality into account in all policy fields.’”


Alan: You understand, that’s what they do. Whenever you get an idea like global warming or whatever, they call it “institutionalizing the terminology” through everything that’s mentioned. It doesn’t matter what topic it is, through the news, you always get it in there. So, they want it institutionalized.

“Tim Aker, spokesman for Get Britain Out, a Eurosceptic campaign group, warned: ‘If the EU has its way, millions of youngster would be denied the pleasure of reading childhood classics such as Paddington Bear, Peter Pan or the Tiger Who Came to Tea because these books show mums and dads in so-called traditional roles. The article goes on to point out the ludicrousness of this sort of legislation. ‘The Eurozone is crumbling, millions are out of work and a generation of young Europeans face a bleak future. Yet the EU is spending its time concentrating on how to socially engineer our children.’”


Alan: Well, it’s not just them. It’s already happened in America, Canada, Britain, all across, every other country across the planet. We’ve all had our indoctrinations, folks. It’s not just starting now. We’ve all had it.

“In all fairness, the proposals are not expected to become Euro-law any time soon, but they do amply illustrate the darkness at the center of the EU experiment, snuffing out human decency the way a black hole supposedly sucks heat out of the galaxy. And then there is this: ‘The policy, championed by EU justice commissioner Viviane Reding, would make it mandatory for all publicly traded companies to fill 40 per cent of seats on their boards with women by 2020 or face hefty fines.’”


Alan: Where is Planet X? We need Planet... and I don’t believe in Planet X. I’ll take Y or Z. I don’t care what it is. It’s about time it came in here. Honestly. Because you know where all this is heading. And these idiots, these weirdos, have got incredible power, you know. Because it’s a big agenda from a top, a top which you can’t even understand. And it’s not just ‘communism.’ Communism was a front, remember, for another group. Anyway, it says,

“Not only are Eurocrats determined to censure mention of families; they are going to legislate gender preferences at the highest level of corporate enterprise. We truly have gotten to the point, long ago actually, where anything that can make it into law becomes the law. For millennia this was not the case. Natural law was observable and what man proposed hewed to natural law or was discarded. This was the basic tenet of original common law. Only in these sophisticated times has it become fashionable to accept that the ‘law’ comes from legislatures. Thus, if the ‘law’ were to mandate that people needed to walk on their hands rather than on their feet, so long as enough votes were available, such legislation could be passed. The saving grace of all this is that trees do not grow to the sky. At some point we anticipate a return, at least a modest one, to the private law about which we often write. Totalitarianism never provides us with a stable system. Too much has to be repressed, which makes it untenable in the long run.”


Alan: But the problem is though, a lot of folk are arrested in the long run as they turn out and say this is all crazy and stupid and I’m not going along with it.

“Political systems, like the body of laws itself, must respect the nature of human beings or are bound to fail. This is one reason why authoritarian systems end up murdering so many people when enforcement of various anti-human legislation becomes impossible. Viewed from this perspective, lights are flashing amber on the EU dashboard.”


Alan: No one wants this EU, this new super-Soviet – and the Commission at the top that no one even knows who they are – and also the parliamentarians way down below who have no power.

“ As EU legislation becomes ever more Draconian and illusory, the likelihood of ‘accidents’ increases. The EU was supposedly conceived of to ensure that European genocide was never again used as a political option. But legislation such as this, attacking the essence of human existence, is not just profoundly inhuman; it shows us that the minds that create it can surely contemplate genocide as well, justifying the means to accomplish what they consider a laudable end. It is also possible to see these proposals within the context of deliberate provocations. The dominant social theme here is obviously one of ‘tolerance’ – of the legislated variety.”


Alan: In other words, “obey.”

“Only the state can protect individual rights.”


Alan: It says.

“But the subdominant social theme might actually be one of deliberate incitement, the idea that the EU can go as far as it wants in disseminating illiberal and nonsensical legislation.”


Alan: To keep a bunch of weirdos happy, I’d add to that one. So, it’s time folk got out of the European Union. It’s definitely communistic in its entire flavor, as you can well know. But it’s run by people you don’t elect, at the very, very top. Nobody wanted the EU except the Royal Institute for International Affairs. They also brought you the United Nations, another far-communist group. So, it’s time we started getting rid of all this nonsense.

Now, it’s good to hear that Beijing is doing well in its auto works. It says,

“Beijing Automotive Works (BAW) was set to start local assembly of minibus taxis in South Africa in January, in a move that promised to create 469 jobs.”


Alan: For those who don’t know it, you see, when you sign the World Trade Organization, all the first world countries (that are all going down the tubes), we redistribute the wealth by giving cash grants to the countries that are up and coming (the emerging nations). They still have China, by the way, listed as an emergent nation and South Africa too. So, we’re over there giving both of these countries cash, to help set up their big businesses, as we go down the tubes. Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And nothing’s left to chance in this big world system. It takes years to plan things, especially wars and so on. And they certainly put a lot of time and our money into it. And they pull it off, really. Generally they pull it off. Here’s an article here, for instance. It says,

“British troops ‘may be flown to Syria’, head of armed forces admits”


Alan: And,

“British troops could be sent to Syria in the event of a major humanitarian crisis,...”


Alan: Well, we’ve gone through all of this stuff, other media has done too, with the Color Revolutions and the funding of terrorists to go into Syria and take it down. And the West is funding all of it, of course. And this is part of their new strategy. It started with the New American Century group. They called it “revolutionary democracy,” where they’d send in soft power to agitate the students and so on, and they’d get into universities and get their circles going and then they’d go and protest and agitate in the streets and then you would send in the hard power if that didn’t work, which is what, of course, we’ve been doing here. So, it’s just a long script as they take out all these countries and yesterday I mentioned a whole list of the countries that came out in the Guardian, in about 2002, that had to be taken out, according to the New American Century group, in the States and, of course, the Israeli papers, as well. They also had the same... I’ve got them all here, from the time. I’ve kept them all because they have the exact same lists of countries that they’d have to take out. But this article says,

“British troops could be sent to Syria in the event of a major humanitarian crisis,...”


Alan: And it says,

“General Sir David Richards said plans were being drawn up in case winter made conditions on the ground worse. Any intervention would be ‘limited’ and needed the support of people inside Syria, he said. But it would be seen as a potential step towards a full-scale military intervention bringing British forces directly into conflict with the regime of president Bashar al-Assad. ‘It would be a huge effort. We would be very cautious about it,’ the chief of the defence staff told the BBC. ‘There is no ultimately military reason why one shouldn’t and I know that all these options are quite rightly being examined. But we are some way off.’ The announcement came as Israeli forces fired ‘warning shots’ into Syria after...”


Alan: They claim that...

“...a stray mortar exploded near a Jewish settlement in the occupied Golan Heights.”


Alan: And so they’re all looking for the reasons to start it all and get the military in there. It’s just the usual, usual, same old stuff. And the article I mentioned yesterday, too... as I say, I’ve kept all the old ones from years and years ago because they disappear, but as I say, Israel had the exact same list of countries to be taken out, as the New American Century group... exactly identical, in fact. But even in Wikipedia, it says,

“According to the report’s preamble, it was written by the Study Group on a New Israeli Strategy Toward 2000, which was a part of the Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies”


Alan: I think it’s the same one that was on YouTube last week, that I put up, where the guy is actually advocating for a false flag to use as an excuse to go in and invade. Anyway, it says,

“Former United States Assistant Secretary of Defense Richard Perle was the ‘Study Group Leader,’ but the final report included ideas from James Colbert, Charles Fairbanks, Jr., Robert Loewenberg, Douglas Feith, David Wurmser, and Meyrav Wurmser.”


Alan: It says,

“The content of the report is organized into an introduction followed by six sections. The report interleaves within its main commentary text a series of ‘key passages of a possible speech.’”

“While there are those who will counsel continuity, Israel has the opportunity to make a clean break; it can forge a peace process and strategy based on an entirely new intellectual foundation, one that restores strategic initiative and provides the nation the room to engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism, the starting point of which must be economic reform. The introduction specifically proposes three new policies: 1. Rather than pursuing a ‘comprehensive peace’ with the entire Arab world, Israel should work jointly with Jordan and Turkey”


Alan: Now, they came out in the CFR, today (Council on Foreign Relations) that they are working now with Turkey. They’re going to get a new initiative to strengthen their ties with the US, Israel and Turkey. So, here’s this article that goes way back to 2000 or before, talking about it. They want to use:

“... Jordan and Turkey to ‘contain, destabilize and roll back those entities that are a threat to all three.’”


Alan: Well, that’s what Turkey’s been doing. They’ve been conned into attacking Assad, of course. And mind you, once they’ve done their job, they’ll be flattened as well. I hope they understand that. They always use them and then ring them out and flatten them.

“Changing the nature of relations with the Palestinians, specifically reserving the right of "hot pursuit" anywhere within Palestinian territory as well as attempting to promote alternatives to Arafat’s...”


Alan: That was Arafat at the time.

“... leadership.”


Alan: He was bumped off with radiation, afterwards.

“Changing relations with the United States stressing self reliance and strategic cooperation. ‘This can only be done if Israel takes serious steps to terminate aid, which prevents economic reform.’”


Alan: Then it says,

“‘A New Approach to Peace’:  ‘While the previous government, and many abroad, may emphasize land for peace— which placed Israel in the position of cultural, economic, political, diplomatic, and military retreat — the new government can promote Western values and traditions. Such an approach, which will be well received in the United States, includes peace for peace, peace through strength and self reliance: the balance of power.’”


Alan: And then they go on about

“Securing the Northern Border”


Alan: And it says,

“Syria challenges Israel on Lebanese soil.”


Alan: That had to be taken out.

“An effective approach, and one with which American can sympathize, would be if Israel seized the strategic initiative along its northern borders by engaging Hizballah, Syria, and Iran,..”


Alan: The same countries that they’re still hammering at today.

“... as the principal agents of aggression in Lebanon, including by: – striking Syria’s drug-money and counterfeiting infrastructure in Lebanon, all of which focuses on Razi Qanan. ---paralleling Syria’s behavior by establishing the precedent that Syrian territory is not immune to attacks emanating from Lebanon by Israeli proxy forces...”


Alan: Back with more, after this break.

{Break ♫- You’re listening to the Republic Broadcasting Network, because you can handle the truth!}

Hi, folks. I’m Alan Watt and talking about the big script – the big script that’s endless war and how long ago it was planned and so on. And reading from an article from 2002 and one’s before it as well, to do with the planning of the takedown of all the Arab countries and it’s from an Israeli point of view. It says,

“Ultimately, Israel can do more than simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict though war. No amount of weapons or victories will grant Israel the peace it seeks. When Israel is on a sound economic footing, and is free, powerful, and healthy internally, it will no longer simply manage the Arab-Israeli conflict; it will transcend it. As a senior Iraqi opposition leader said recently: Israel must rejuvenate and revitalize its moral and intellectual leadership. It is an important — if not the most important--element in the history of the Middle East. Israel — proud, wealthy, solid, and strong — would be the basis of a truly new and peaceful Middle East.”


Alan: Well, it will be if they end up running all those other countries, too. But it says here,

“Brian Whitaker reported in a September 2002 article published in The Guardian that ‘With several of the Clean Break paper’s authors now holding...’”


Alan: The guys who wrote all this stuff, are...

“‘... now holding key positions in Washington, the plan for Israel to transcend its foes by reshaping the Middle East looks a good deal more achievable today than it did in 1996. Americans may even be persuaded to give up their lives to achieve it.’”


Alan: Well we’ve known what happened since then.

“In March 2003 Patrick J. Buchanan, referring to the 2003 invasion of Iraq and the report, wrote that ‘Their plan, which urged Israel to re-establish ‘the principle of preemption,’ ...”


Alan: That means that if you suspect, even anybody suspects (even a paranoid person), that you’re going to be attacked, you attack first. It says,

“... has now been imposed by Perle, Feith, Wurmser & Co. on the United States. Ian Buruma wrote in August 2003 in the New York Times that: ‘Douglas Feith and Richard Perle advised Netanyahu, who was prime minister in 1996, to make ‘a clean break’ from the Oslo accords with the Palestinians. They also argued that Israeli security would be served best by regime change in surrounding countries...’”


Alan: In other words, you’d have to get rid of all the regimes around them, which the US has been doing awfully well, with Britain.

“‘... Despite the current mess in Iraq, this is still a commonplace in Washington. In Paul Wolfowitz’s words, ‘The road to peace in the Middle East goes through Baghdad.’ It has indeed become an article of faith (literally in some cases) in Washington that American and Israeli interests are identical, but this was not always so, and ‘Jewish interests’ are not the main reason for it now.’”


Alan: He said. I wonder what it is then, eh.

“Buruma continues: ‘What we see, then, is not a Jewish conspiracy, but a peculiar alliance of evangelical Christians,...’”


Alan: Because, remember Bush brought in, and he paid millions of dollars to bring on all the top evangelical Christians in the States (the ones that wave their hands about a lot and think they’re all going to heaven tomorrow).

“‘... foreign-policy hard-liners, lobbyists for the Israeli government and neoconservatives, a number of whom happen to be Jewish. But the Jews among them -- Perle, Wolfowitz, William Kristol, editor of The Weekly Standard, et al. -- are more likely to speak about freedom and democracy than about Halakha (Jewish law). What unites this alliance of convenience is a shared vision of American destiny and the conviction that American force and a tough Israeli line on the Arabs are the best ways to make the United States strong, Israel safe and the world a better place.’”


Alan: It says. So, it goes on and on with more quotes and quotes and quotes from different newspapers, but we know the mess and of course it was planned back in the 90’s at least. And this is just more evidence of you’re living through a script. Everything is a script. Everything is all pre-scripted, you know and published, basically, just like a book and we’re living through it. But the media, of course, makes you think that things are just happening day by day and that’s all there is to it.

And, of course, we’ve got articles out now too, talking about ‘are we getting more stupid?’ Well, look around you. It says,

“Researchers claim our intelligence is diminishing as we no longer need it to survive”


Alan: Well, I won’t read the article but what I will mention: that’s exactly what Charles Galton Darwin said in his book, The Next Million Years. He said that, we, the elite, who run the world, must retain our wildness, we must be wild men. Because a wild creature, you see, has all of its faculties working to survive. It’s a survival mechanism. But he says the public won’t need it. This was in 1956 or so. He says the public won’t need it because the State, the State will be making all their decisions for them. And getting back to this article,

“Researchers claim our intelligence is diminishing as we no longer need it to survive”


Alan: There’s always an agency there to do it for you, or social workers or something, you know. And then this one too... it’s interesting how they’re trying to get away from the investigations. In fact, they’ve done a good job of diverting attention away from the BBC and all of its pervs that have been there for years. Everybody who’s been in the BBC knows this. And, of course, Jimmy Savile and Jimmy Savile’s pals up the tree, you know. And they don’t want to go any further on the investigations obviously, because there’s too many important folk up there (lords and all the rest of it and even higher). So, they’re concentrating now on older articles.

“A retired bishop of the Church of England has been arrested by police investigating allegations of child sexual abuse.”


Alan: It says here he was arrested on eight separate offences.

“... As the Guardian points out, the Right Reverend Peter Ball is thought to be the most senior member of the Church of England to have been arrested in connection with a child sexual abuse inquiry. He was arrested on suspicion of offences against eight boys and young men, ranging in age from twelve to their early twenties. The offences are alleged to have been committed during the 1980s and 1990s. Bishop Ball was the former bishop of Gloucester. He resigned in 1993, as This Is The West Country notes, after receiving a police caution for committing an act of gross indecency against a teenager. As the Guardian notes, on his resignation, the former bishop moved to...”


Alan: Guess where...

“... Manor Lodge, a wisteria-clad property owned by the Duchy of Cornwall, the private estate of Prince Charles. At the time, Ball said: He (Prince Charles) has been wonderfully kind and allowed me to have a duchy house. The prince is a loyal friend. I have immense admiration for him, he has been through horrific times and is a great person.”


Alan: Well that’s pretty-much what Savile said too, isn’t it? So, it says,

“Sussex Police...”


Alan: Released a press statement and it says,

“We make it clear that the force will always take seriously any allegations of historic sexual offending, and every possible step will be taken to investigate whenever appropriate.”


Alan: Well why aren’t you in and getting all through the BBC? Hmm? Why aren’t you doing that? Well, they can’t go there, you see. There’s no way they’ll go there.

Now, I put up an article a while back and it was when Tony Blair was in. I’ll put it up again tonight, by the assistant prime minister of Britain at that time (Tony’s right-hand man), who said he was ordered by Tony Blair to open the floodgates of Britain to all mass immigration in order to destroy any remnant of the British culture, forever, so much so, that it could never reform or come back again. And it’s still going on. But, mind you, I mean, my whole life I’ve watched Britain advertise in the papers. Every year there was articles: Britain’s the best welfare state to come to under the EU. Every year they had these articles out. And now, of course, in the poorest countries, after communism in Europe, they’re flooding into Britain now. It says

“UK will not...”


Alan: Hear the wording here:

“United Kingdom will not extend Romania and Bulgaria migration curbs”


Alan: Rather than say, “the UK is continuing to bring in all Eastern Europeans.” See how they try to work it for you? So,

“Bulgarians and Romanians will gain the unrestricted right to live and work in the UK from December 2013, Home Secretary Theresa May has confirmed. Temporary curbs imposed in 2005 to protect the British labour market are set to expire on that date.”


Alan: So, because of a law that they passed, that’s going to expire, they’re just going to let them flood in?

“The Labour Party have said they would support any moves to extend the ban. But Mrs May told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show that was not possible...”


Alan: Now. You see, because Britain’s under this new Soviet European Union parliament. And,

“... was not possible under EU law, although she was hoping to limit the impact on the UK economy. The Home Office has not produced an official estimate of how many of the 29 million Romanian and Bulgarian citizens will take advantage of their new freedoms when controls are lifted.”


Alan: Well they have been flooding out because I know people over there. They’ve been flooding in there for quite some time. And it is true Britain will bring them in and put you right on welfare and all the rest of it because that’s the EU law, you see. And it says,

“But some experts predict a large number of immigrants from Eastern Europe, which Labour has warned could put pressure on British jobs and wages.”


Alan: Well, what is Britain today? I mean it’s just sinking. It’s just sinking, I mean literally sinking with the weight of people that are coming in from all over, because no one else in Europe has got such great benefit systems. No one else has got that.

“The government’s migration advisory committee says there is evidence Bulgarians would move to Britain because of its stronger economy, and it was ‘plausible’ Romanians would come for the same reasons. But extending restrictions could involve tearing up the provisions of the treaty signed when Romania and Bulgaria joined the EU.”


Alan: So, I guess you just have to sink, you know. And it’s not just... don’t blame the folk in Bulgaria and Romania, because there’ll be folk on the other side there too and agencies even, like the Rockefeller Center, like they do in Mexico, urging them all to go over. And I’m not kidding you. And there’s nothing there. They’ve been plundered by years of Soviet systems. Plundered. Also, tonight, I’ll put up an article. It says,

“Where Your Tax Dollar Goes”


Alan: For Canada. Canadians might be interested. Maybe they won’t. They’ll probably yawn. But it says,

“For the fiscal year ending March 31st 2006,...”


Alan: I think that was the last one they put up.

“... Canada’s federal government collected $222.2 billion in taxes and other revenues. That represents a bit over 16 per cent of our country’s nearly $1.4 trillion economy.”


Alan: And it says,

“Here’s a quick overview of where that money went-and how it was raised.”


Alan: And it gives you a rundown. Interest payments alone are $33 billion, so that’s quite something else. And then the transfer payments are $118.3 billion etc etc. So, it breaks it down, but the biggest of all goes to interest, because you see, Canada used to run its own banking system. Until Pierre Trudeau got in, who was a communist by the way, everybody knew it, the press all knew it but when he ran to be the prime minister, none of them mentioned it because they were all told to keep their mouth shut. But Pierre Trudeau was a member of the Comintern at one point, when he was young. And he led the Canadian delegations over to Moscow, so everybody knew he was a communist. So, he basically shut the old Bank of Canada system down, where you borrowed from your main bank. Canada was the only country in the world, remember, that didn’t suffer through the Great Depression like other countries and other countries sent their people over to find out how our system worked. But then Trudeau got in, destroyed it and before he left and was out of there, he’d left us with billions already in debt with this new system, where we borrow from the private banking systems and so on. But I’ll put that up. And this article too. It says,

“Oh Canada! Imposing Austerity on the World’s Most Resource-rich Country”


Alan: It says,

“Even the world’s most resource-rich country has now been caught in the debt trap. Its once-proud government programs are being subjected to radical budget cuts—cuts that could have been avoided if the government had not quit borrowing from its own central bank in the 1970s. Last week in Ottawa, the Canadian House of Commons passed the federal government’s latest round of budget cuts and austerity measures. Highlights included chopping 19,200 public sector jobs, cutting federal programs by $5.2 billion per year, and raising the retirement age for millions of Canadians from 65 to 67. The justification for the cuts was a massive federal debt that is now over C$ 581 billion, or 84% of GDP.”


Alan: Well we’ve got that gross well being they call it. That’s even better, supposedly. We can all take very cheap drugs, I suppose and all be happy. It says,

“An online budget game furnished by the local newspaper the Globe and Mail gave readers a chance to try to balance the budget themselves.”


Alan: Well, it’s quite easy, you just set up the old banking system we used to have, stop borrowing from private banks, tear up your treaties at the United Nations, so as that you don’t have to sponsor up-and-coming countries, emergent countries through the World Trade Organization and paying for their hospitals to get built in China and elsewhere and India and giving them money (cash grants) to start up their businesses while you slash all the businesses at home. That’s quite easy to do, isn’t it? But that’s not going to happen because this is the agenda, folks, to take down first world countries (flatten them). To really flatten them. That’s what it’s all about. I hope you understand that.

Also, tonight, I’ll put up an article. It’s a public relations ad, really, about the Council on Foreign Relations, put out by the Council on Foreign Relations, who are the best spinners of all magic around.

“The Council on Foreign Relations is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries.”


Alan: They’re also the main adviser to every country, by the way, in the West. And they also have their own guys (members) appointed as prime ministers and presidents. Their own historian has mentioned that in his own book. So, this is the group... no one elects it. It’s private. It’s a branch of the Royal Institute for International Affairs (private), from London, who came up with the idea to draft up the United Nations, set them into motion. They drafted up the integration for Europe, for the parliament there. The Council on Foreign Relations drafted up the integration for the Americas. They came on television in Canada, under their own moniker and admitted that on Canadian television. They had drafted up the treaties that the prime ministers and presidents signed. Quite the independent, you know, charitable organization, eh? I’ll put that up tonight too. Also too, I mentioned, getting back to the article from 2002, and how Israel said they might have to make a deal with Turkey.

“Turkey is a rising regional and global power facing, as is the United States, the challenges of political transitions in the Middle East, bloodshed in Syria, and Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons. As a result, it is incumbent upon the leaders of the United States and Turkey to define a new partnership ‘in order to make a strategic relationship a reality,’ says...”


Alan: Guess who?

“... a new Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)–sponsored Independent Task Force.”


Alan: That tells the government what to do. So, it tells you who’s on this independent task force. Guess who’s at the head of it. Madeline K. Albright. You know the one who was in charge of NATO, as they slaughtered and starved folk, across the Middle East.

“... and former national security adviser Stephen J. Hadley, and is directed by Steven A. Cook,...”


Alan: And it says,

“The Task Force includes twenty-three prominent experts who represent a variety of perspectives and backgrounds. ‘Turkey may not yet have the status of one of Washington’s traditional European allies,’ the report explains, ‘but there is good strategic reason for the bilateral relationship to grow and mature into a mutually beneficial partnership that can manage a complex set of security, economic, humanitarian, and environmental problems.’”


Alan: They have to get “environmental” in there too. They didn’t say climate change though.

“The relationship should reflect ‘not only common American-Turkish interests, but also Turkey’s new stature as an economically and politically successful country with a new role to play in a changing Middle East,’...”


Alan: Exactly as those articles from 2002 said: they’d use Turkey to do it. So, I’ll put that up. See, you’re living through a script, folks. It was all done years ago. And also, this article too. And another one on civilization is making humanity less intelligent, the study claims, etc etc. But you don’t have to think, as I say, you don’t have to think at all, because it’s true enough your TV does it... remember what Brzezinski says, the people will eventually become unable to think for themselves. That’s the plan, in his own book. He said that they’ll look to the media to do all their thinking and eventually, their reasoning for them. Have you noticed, you can lead horses to water with clues, clues, clues, but you can’t make them make the final connection and make them drink. They have to be told now. They have to be told the ending. I’m not kidding you. That’s how folk are now. Back with more after this.

{Break ♫}

Hi, folks. I’m back and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix and just before I take a caller, I’ll put another link up tonight too – I’ll put all these links up tonight at – to do with the Bilderberg Steering Committee; it’s meeting in Rome right now. Now we’ll go to Jim from Texas if he’s still there. Are you still there, Jim?

Jim: Yeah, I’m here Alan. Can you hear me?

Alan: Yes I can.

Jim: I’ve been listening to your show off and on for many years, but lately, the last couple of years, I’ve kind of been in a valley. You know what I mean?

Alan: Yes.

Jim: As far as the, I guess you could call it, the waking up process. I’m not a huge fan of the term but I haven’t really conquered myself. I don’t know if you... you probably talk to so many people about people getting stagnant, you know, in the waking up process.  And that’s something you hear of, is people getting stuck on really just conquering themselves and getting themselves right, before they can go further in the process.

Alan: You see, you’ve got to understand that there’s so much history to this movement, what’s happening today. It goes back hundreds and hundreds of years and most folk never touch on this topic and you have to understand what’s behind it; the hell that’s still to come. It is a hell that’s to come, by the way. It’s not going to be a happy place.  And the only thing you can say... remember, I can’t say that information or knowledge will free you to an extent – it will free you in your own head so that you know exactly why things are happening, but it doesn’t bring you peace because you still have to go through the hell that’s being laid in front of us all the time. But at least you understand the real reasons why and then you break out of even a higher level to realize that almost all the media articles are either scarcely touching it or it’s absolute rubbish that you’re reading altogether. You have to go into the past, to the old, old history books to find out what this movement even really is. It’s anti-human; there’s no doubt about it. There is a dominant minority that call themselves by different titles, you might say, but they truly believe they have the right to rule the world. And they hate ordinary people. They hate us all. There’s no doubt about that. They’re taught to hate us from childhood and they also are taught that they have the right to rule us. And, as I say, it’s a very, very old thing. It’s well documented in certain old books, although it’s politically incorrect today to go into it all. In fact it can be awfully dangerous. But they run the world. They’re the ones behind the greening agendas, all the different tricks to make us all slaves and so that their agencies, that all work for them, will manage us all from birth to death and bring down the populations and so on and so on. It’s nothing to do with climate change. That was a big thing that the Club of Rome dreamed up, which they own. And the Club of Rome said that. They said, we were given the task to find a way to basically dominate the people and bring the world together under some guise. We thought about UFOs, all the usual stuff, then we hit on global warming. That would fit the bill. That would fit the bill. That was their task: to find a reason they’d push. And then you have the old, old bankers that are a big part of this, the international boys, the big ones who got together and they formed the Royal Institute for International Affairs. They drafted up, as I say, the integration of Europe and they did one for the Americas and for the world, for the global system under the United Nations. You got to understand, we have to break every treaty that’s been made for the last hundred years, every treaty and there’s hundreds of them, to get back to any semblance of taking care of ourselves and surviving for ourselves with our own minds intact. Nothing else would do, nothing else would do. But stick in there and you will come across what I’m talking about. Thanks for calling.

From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God or your gods go with you.

{Closing Music ♫}


Topics of show covered in following links:

Now the EU Seeks to Ban the Family

Ireland ----Low Turnout on "UN Rights of the Child" Vote

& More on Above

Beijing Auto Works Opens in South Africa

British Troops Prepare for Syria

CFR Pushes for US-Turkey Strategic Partnership

2002 Article with Designated Middle-Eastern Countries to be Destroyed

A Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm

Getting Stupid, Stupid---Gone!

Retired Anglican Church Bishop Arrested over Child Abuse Investigation

Blair and Straw Accused over Secret Plan for Multicultural U.K.--They Succeeded

UK--Unrestricted Immigration Expected from Bulgaria and Romania due to EU Treaty

Where Canada's Tax-Dollars Go

Austerity for Canada

Council on Foreign Relations Promoting Itself and its Power

Bilderberg Steering Group to Meet in Rome


Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering Information:


"Cutting Through"
  Volumes 1, 2, 3


"Waiting for the Miracle....."
Also available in Spanish or Portuguese translation: "Esperando el Milagro....." (Español) & "Esperando um Milagre....." (Português)


Ancient Religions and History MP3 CDs:
Part 1 (1998) and Part 2 (1998-2000)


Blurbs and 'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc)


"Reality Check Part 1"   &   "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom, Esoterica and ...TIME"