August 27, 2012 (#1159)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt August 27th, 2012:
Believe TV, Be Selfless, Happy and Helpless:
"Our World Managers are Really Top-Heavy,
Institutions and Think-Tanks Pushing Levy
For More Aid to Themselves and Corporations,
All Owned by Big Boys Who Run Foundations,
The Voting Scam has Worked for a Century,
Front Men Politicos, Hot-Air, Some Levity,
It's Been a Charade, Past ain't Comin' Back,
You're Deindustrialized and Right on Track,
When Nasty Deeds Done, You Suspend Disbelief,
Tune in to Familiar, It's Cozy, No Grief,
Shy Away from Unpleasant, Makes You Feel Bad,
Stay in Infantilism, You're Technically Mad,
But that's the New Normal, Everyone's the Same,
Perfect Culture Control's the Name of the Game"
© Alan Watt August 27, 2012
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – August 27, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers’ Comments)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 27th of August 2012. For newcomers, help yourself to the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com; you’ll see a whole bunch of other sites listed there, these are the official sites. If you find sticking on the com site, try the other sites for download because lots of folk go into the com at the same time. Remember too, all those sites carry audios for free download and they all carry transcripts in English for print-up and if you want transcripts in other languages you can go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu and take your pick from the choice offered there.
Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you because I don’t bring on advertisers as guests. And I try to, and it’s very difficult of course because you’re bombarded with news all the time, but the thing is, I try to stick to the basic facts because there’s extraneous news that is just all over the place. If you look at history, history is really a system, you’re just watching a system and the progress of a system, a designed system too, by the way; it has been for a long time, by those at the top who decided an awful long time ago that they’d use science to take over the whole world, and that also meant science of the mind, science of education because they can program you through education of course – it’s essential you get that initial programming – and then, of course, media, which you think is all free and independent, takes over and gives you all your thoughts and opinions from then on. So, I go through the histories of the big organizations and foundations that run the world, the “parallel government,” they actually call it that themselves and Thatcher referred to it as that as well because they take ex-prime ministers and presidents to get the job done, the big job, because once they’re out of politics they’re not responsible to the public anymore and they can get all the work really done behind the scenes and that’s why they never retire, if you notice.
So, I go through the history to show you that you’re living through a planned system, an agenda; and it’s a very intricate agenda, it’s all-encompassing because they’ve covered every basis, basically, across the world. Not just a global agenda with happy smiling faces, as they always give you across the sea with the United Nations but, really, a scientific system where they’ll bring in a new type of human, eventually— we’re different already; we’re already bioengineered from the last lot. If you haven’t noticed, look around you and see all the gender bending and all the rest of it that’s going on— that didn’t happen by itself by the way. And of course, the people are far more placid than they’d ever been before as well, when they shouldn’t be and if you go into the histories and writings of the big planners who worked in their lifetimes for the global system, who wrote books about it, like Bertrand Russell and Aldous Huxley, both of them said that eventually they could make the public happy and contended in situations where they ought not to be; that’s already happened. People don’t complain anymore about prices or anything else, they just go along with things and zonk out on television or get lost on the internet, and something has happened to them if you haven’t noticed. So, you’re living through a big, big agenda. And as I say, the big boys did write dry, dusty old books in your library, they’re left there… I’ve picked some out over the years and only found maybe a couple of people over thirty or forty years have actually taken these books out to read, because they are boring, boring books, but they actually tell you the agenda because these guys took part in world meetings where they designed parts of the agenda, right down to your cultural changes, and the social norms would all change; what kind of culture you’d have from the 60’s, 70’s, 80’s, 90’s, down to the present time and beyond, by the way, and it’s all come to pass because they’re not kidding— they’re not kidding, these guys that write the dry books. They’re not kidding. We’re living under it already, for those who don’t know. And, it’s also called “post-democratic” although they use the term “democracy” to fool the public. And we’re post-consumer. And post other things as well.
Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt; we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix. And, for those who think we just drift along and crises develop by themselves and politicians get in on the act and they solve things in some ham-fisted manner, but the fact is, nothing that happens on a big scale comes out of the blue— it’s planned years and years and years in advance. Every single war they do, or “policing action” as they like to call them, takes many, many years to plan before they do anything at all and that’s the reality of life: we’re fooled and conned. Remember, propaganda, and I’ve talked a lot about propaganda, propaganda isn’t to deceive an enemy: propaganda is to deceive their own people, you see, in time of war and it’s always been that way and always will be that way. So you’ll never get truth on what you think of as your government, why they’re doing something— it doesn’t happen. They don’t come out and tell you the truth; that’s why they have propaganda, which they call public relations departments, you see. And they give handouts to the media all the time, that’s only too happy to put them right in (it saves them writing up a piece themselves), so it’s all done for them. The Pentagon does it, straight out; I’ve done the articles before where they just hand out these multiple handouts and email them off to all the newspapers and it’s put straight in. Same on the weather modification, weather control, and even weather modification denial— that’s all handed out there too. You’re living in an amazing system of deception, and it’s planned that way. And many of the big boys like Brzezinski talked about it, that eventually people would be unable to think for themselves— they’d look to the media, and especially television, to tell them what to think or believe and give them their opinions as well. And he wrote that forty-odd years ago. It was already there back then, mind you; it was working then too.
So, tonight I’ll put up a link as well to show you. It’s from one university and you have go through them all, of course, if you want to spend a thousand lifetimes, but the fact is this university is from Pennsylvania of course, and it says…
Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program
Alan: And it’s got a list of Think Tanks in here that just astonishes you, and that’s not them all, that’s only a few. But it shows you what they’re up to, the top think thanks, their operating budgets; those below $5 million a year for budget and those above 5 million dollars, expert panels, etcetera, and how they basically give you everything that you think is real, including your topics to argue over and everything else. And, as I say, it gives you Think Tanks rankings in categories and it’s for 2011, it was published in 2012. But it’s just astonishing. And this is just, as I say, one university doing this. But I’ll put this up tonight for those who have an interest in going through dry stuff, dry boring stuff.
And some people say to me, "why don’t you put more feeling into what you’re saying? It’s such terrible stuff.” Well, I’ve always been like this because, you see, I’ve always known what was going on. You only get upset if you’re just waking up or if you still can’t bring yourself to believe it. You know, that’s why you get upset. And so, this is the reality that we live in. So I’ll put this up tonight for those, as I say, who are a bit beyond all of that and are into reality— true reality.
Part of it too, as I’ve mentioned before and the big boys themselves that wrote so much about it and spoke so much about it and even did books about it, some even fictional books which were awfully good because some of them were allowed to do this. Fiction, remember, is called “predictive programming” for the public; you get lost in a movie or a story or a novel and it gives you ideas, it implants ideas in your mind of possibilities and then when they really happen you act towards them as though they were rather familiar to you and it must happen— it’s progress they call it. So people like Aldous Huxley wrote Brave New World in the 1930’s to do with the controlled society where they’d be beyond just simply culling off all the “old types” or the “defunct types,” the kinds in a post-industrial society; they’d gone beyond that and they had a perfectly balanced society of population control and no one mated the old-fashioned way for procreation purposes and they were all promiscuous certainly but they couldn’t have children, it was all done by exogenesis, outside the human body, and, of course, they tampered with the genes and so on— and that was in the 1930’s remember, and it was awfully well done. And you can watch the movies, there’s two movies out, on Brave New World, at least two versions, maybe three, for those who don’t want to read the books.
There’s an article here and it’s pretty typical too and it’s from different articles in the mainstream. They can put stuff in the mainstream today but people, like I mentioned the other day with Jacques Ellul talking about the news, the person who wants to get the news, the average Joe who tunes in to the 6 o’clock news, never retains it— they don’t retain it. It’s kind of unreal to them and they’re not getting news at all because it’s all authorized stuff they’re being told, to shape their minds for the controllers’ purposes. This one here is about...
Veiled Threats By Prominent Neo-Malthusians: Cull Human Population Or Expect “Vast Die-Off”
(A: I guess by overpopulation and famine and all the rest of it.)
In a report published last April by the Royal Society titled People and the Planet, the elitist UK-based society calls for massive population reduction and de-industrialization of the west.
(A: Well, we’re already pretty well deindustrialized.)
However drenched in euphemisms, the report cannot conceal its ominous undertones. Listed among its “key recommendations” the report proposes several measures similar to the one put out recently by MIT in which a drastic reduction of the population is called for in the name of “modelling” and predictions.
Immediately after the Royal Society released its call for more death and mega-cities, none other than Paul Ehrlich
(A: You know, they revive him every so often.)
weighed in to regurgitate his own eugenic fancies. The Guardian reported that Ehrlich, who contributed to the report, eagerly endorses its conclusions. In regards to redistributing wealth,
(A: And they’re all commies at the top; at least they pretend to be. But you must understand the real communists are very elitist, incredibly elitist. They don’t believe that we’re all equal at all. They really believe in this distribution of labor with themselves at the top doing all the ordering around, you know. It says...)
In regards to redistributing wealth, Ehrlich is quite upfront about his opinion on the matter:
(A: Remember too, the elitists, I should say, also funded communism because they thought it would be the best way to manage the population of the world, and there’s less freedoms under it, the state guides you along all your paths right from birth to death and that’s why they thought it would be far better to have a communistic, or socialistic, system and the bankers, of course, were all behind it— it’s far tidier on their books you see, very tidy.)
The Guardian reported that Ehrlich, who contributed to the report, eagerly endorses its conclusions. In regards to redistributing wealth, Ehrlich is quite upfront about his opinion on the matter:
“They (population and resources) multiply together. You have to deal with them together. We have too much consumption among the rich and too little among the poor....”
(A: It’s a lie too because what they really mean by that is the first world countries have to come right down to the bottom and be poor as well. And we’re already doing that. Your governments have for a long time been taking your tax cash and spreading it on all kind of things, but including throwing it across the world, supposedly to third world countries but it goes to where they have their latest general in charge of some country, some third world country, and then they bring all their sweat factories into it. It says...)
“How many of your support depends on lifestyles.”, Ehrlich stated. “We came up with 1.5 to 2 billion because you can have big active cities and wilderness. If you want a battery chicken world where everyone has minimum space and food and everyone is kept just about alive you might be able to support in the long term about 4 or 5 billion people. But you already have 7 billion. So we have to humanely and as rapidly as possible move to population shrinkage.”
(A: That sounds better than killing you off—population shrinkage. It’s like a lot of rain and you’re just going to get small or something.)
Then Ehrlich plays the harp strings of fear, making more veiled death-threats:
“The question is: can you go over the top without a disaster, like a worldwide plague or a nuclear war between India and Pakistan? If we go on at the pace we are there’s going to be various forms of disaster. Some maybe slow motion disasters like people getting more and more hungry, or catastrophic disasters because the more people you have the greater the chance of some weird virus transferring from animal to human populations, there could be a vast die-off.”
(A: This is what these guys dream about at night, you know.)
Some of the conclusions of the Royal Society report:
“The most developed and the emerging economies must stabilize and then reduce material consumption levels through: dramatic improvements in resource use efficiency,
(A: That means bureaucracies handling it all and public-private partnerships, big corporations.)
including: reducing waste; investment in sustainable resources, technologies and infrastructures; and systematically decoupling economic activity from environmental impact.”
What the Royal Society terms “systematically decoupling economic activity from environmental impact” is actually a rephrasing of Agenda 21’s plan to gradually de-industrialize the west as well as the creation of megacities in which the bulk of the world’s population can be locked up to make them more manageable. Or, what the Royal Society calls “the potential for urbanisation to reduce material consumption.”
(A: Now they had some old documentaries up on youtube from the BBC and one of them was from even the fifties, I think, and you hear the guy then talking, as they show you a little very early satellite image of the world, he says that we’ve got to stop this urban sprawl and concentrate the public into cities. It’s an old agenda, you understand. Your whole life long is only part, a small part of a vast agenda. Anyway, getting back to this article, it says...)
In a statement put out by “Planet Under Pressure” in the run-up to the 2012 “Earth Summit” several scientists called for denser cities in order to mitigate worldwide population growth. When in doubt that UN’s Agenda 21 is not the Mein Kampf of our day, one should consider yet another in-your-face confession from yet another certified biocratic control freak.
According to an MSNBC article one of the scientists while speaking about human populations worldwide, stated:
“We certainly don’t want them strolling about the entire countryside. We want them to save land for nature by living closely [together].”
(A: And I’ve got the link for that too, the guy that said all that.)
Insisting the world’s population be locked up within the confounds of mega-cities, the elite realizes that if the herd is to be properly controlled walls are needed- thick walls, and by constructing these walls, making the masses go this or that way will be made easier.
A: And that’s where it’s all going folks.
Back with more after this break...
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through the Matrix, and talking about the big cull that they want to come and, of course, you can do it the slow way too; the rising cancer rate tells you something big is going on, and they’re not too concerned about the reason, which means they obviously know the reason, which meant they created it, I would imagine. So, you’re living through a massive agenda.
This article goes on to say that…
Chief scientist Michail Fragkias involved with “Planet under Pressure” told MSNBC that “the answer (to population growth) is denser cities.”
(A: Now remember, from the United Nations own website they tell you the population growth in every country in the world. Every year they come out with it, but they also admit that most it is from immigration from third world countries to first world countries. If it wasn’t for that, we’d be plummeting; in fact, they actually say that, that the people who were already there before the mass immigration came in, in the last 40 years or so, are dieing off. They’re not having children because they were awfully good and they copied the lifestyle they were told to have: go after the material goods, don’t have children, be promiscuous but don’t have children— don’t worry, if you do have any problems the state will take care of it for free. So, they have massive immigration coming in because they say that they need – the politicians say that (they’ve all said that, by the way, even the present ones) – immigration because the original people are not having children, you see, and they’ve got to pay off the national debt, they say. It says...)
“If cities can develop in height rather than in width that would be much more preferable and environmentally not as harmful”, Fragkias said.
People who know anything about history know that the creation of mega-cities in which the masses may be rounded up and enclosed, is identical to the Nazi principle of the “ghetto”...
(A: I’d say it’s also actually more identical to the Russian Soviet system, the Bolshevik system, where they actually boasted, Lenin boasted and so did the rest of them, that they were killing off an entire class of people, which they did. And not just the middle classes and the intelligentsia, but they killed off pretty well the whole farming class, even tiny small farmers. And by the way, China is the same way. Communist systems are always the same. They’re all on board with this big, big city thing and very few folk living on the land— just enough to feed them, you see. So, it’s the same system. And who is backing it up? Well, the big international banking boys, because they funded communism in the first place. So...)
Some of the organizers of “Planet under Pressure” are founding their plea on the notion that we (as humanity) have entered the “Anthropocene”: a new geological era in which humans- not natural conditions- are the main drivers of geological and meteorological processes. Citing a website devoted to this concept, Martin Rees of the Royal Society stated at the conference:
“This century is special in the Earth’s history. It is the first when one species — ours — has the planet’s future in its hands,” reported the AFP news agency. “We’ve invented a new geological era: the Anthropocene.”, he stated.
This echoes yet another scientist, a professor at the University of Colorado, who in recent times also mentioned this new era in relation to a call for population control when he stated:
“Scientists now speak of humanity’s increased demands and impacts on the globe as ushering in a new geological epoch: the Anthropocene. Such selfish and destructive appropriation of the resources of the Earth can only be described as interspecies genocide.”
(A: And it’s fantastic too when you see all these guys belong to these big ThinkTanks that are funded by the big international corporations that are the guys that are ripping up the planet. So you’ve got to start wondering about things, you see. The fact is, you see, they’ll use any excuse they can to cull off what they now see as an obsolete part of humanity in a post-industrial society. It says...)
In addition the professor said: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change....
(A: Well they’ll use that as they spray us like bugs at the bottom every day from the skies, and they have been for years. So they’ve got all these different articles in it. It’s all our fault, you see; it’s too much of you, not them, but too much of you, you see. And it says...)
The report also stressed that education should be entirely brought under control of the UN:
“In order to meet previously agreed goals for universal education,
(A: And that’s what the whole point of UNESCO and so on is.)
policy makers in countries with low school attendance need to work with international funders and organisations, such as UNESCO, UNFPA, UNICEF, IMF, World Bank and Education for All. Financial and non-financial barriers must be overcome to achieve high-quality primary and secondary education for all the world’s young, ensuring equal opportunities for girls and boys.”
(A: What they really mean by that is the same indoctrination on all this stuff I’ve just been reading so that they’ll all believe it, you see; that’s what it’s for. Education has always been for propaganda purposes. And it says...)
In 2004, emeritus professor of physics at California State University, Roger Dittmann, stated that all policies related to Agenda 21 should be pursued with the aim of worldwide population reduction and population control. “The Big Die Off,” the professor eagerly added, “has already begun.”
In his presentation Sustainable Development, the New International Scientific Order, and UN Reform Dittmann gives his own definition of the term “sustainable development:”
“Economic (and other) development that leads to reduction in population toward an optimum level for maximization of the quality of life, i.e. environmentally benign development that reduces the birth rate,” Dittmann explains on page 14 of his lecture notes.
Furthermore, the emeritus professor writes bluntly that (capitals by Dittmann) “The Big Die Off has already begun (page 17).”
In order to facilitate such a massive “die-off,” the professor proposes (page 18) global governance to make sure the directives will be universally applied...
A: And most folk will listen to this and not believe it because they’ll believe that their favorite comedians on television, or whatever it happens to be, will come out and tell them, "oh, wake up, be very alarmed," and of course that won’t happen, but they do look to the media to think for them, like Brzezinski says, to do their reasoning for them. That’s why they can print this stuff openly too. They’re very blatant, you know, and they mean business.
Back with more after this break...
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re back Cutting Through the Matrix, and I’m talking about the reality of the world. Most folk don’t like reality. Some try to escape into the past and say “we can get America back” or something like that; in reality, this agenda is going on whether you like to think you can get America back or not. I mean, it’s been going on long before you were born in fact— long before you were born. Because eugenics is a very old, old idea and even at the beginning of the 20th Century the U.S. was leading the world with its “better families” program where they gave awards to people that they thought had the best skull shapes and they’d measure their nose to their ears and all that kind of stuff, and of course they had to be fairly wealthy too because, you see, they claim that you have a “poverty gene” and they have to get rid of all those with the “poverty gene”. I’m not kidding about this— I’m not kidding at all. So, getting back to this article here, and it says that…
In order to facilitate such a massive “die-off,” the professor [Dittman] proposes (page 18) global governance to make sure the directives will be universally applied:
“Since this is a global effort, it requires global organization, both governmental and popular,” he writes.
Dittmann’s specific remark concerning this “big die off” echoes Paul Ehrlich in response to the Royal Society’s report. Veiled threats from the most vicious of neo-eugenicists the world has ever known. I don’t have to remind readers that all this talk of death and mass-death is becoming more common every day.
(A: And it certainly is. But most folk switch off to it; getting back to Propaganda by Jacques Ellul, how it works on the public. Anyway, it says...)
Only recently I highlighted the case of University College’s Emeritus Professor John Guillebaud, patron of the UK-based “Population Matters”, who depicted among other things a machine-gun, a hospital bed, and a knife dripping with blood, as examples of “natural” population control as opposed to “artificial” methods such as contraception and family planning.
(A: And I’d also add into it your xenoestrogens that you’re eating, and it’s in all your food and all the rest of it, that turn you sterile, nevermind all the inoculations you get that help that along the path as well. And...)
Back to Dittmann’s 2004 presentation. In his notes he also calls for a new “International Scientific Order” to make sure the entire scientific community is armed and ready to implement worldwide population reduction. Dittmann:
“Not only do people require organization about their (multiple) identities (including professional, scholarly, and scientific), they need international, even supranational affiliation, facing a common adversary.”
(A: Now these are articles that you have been programmed that only come out of the mouths of guys in uniforms, screaming at microphones, from old black-and-white documentaries. And these are coming from scientists today, and they’re all over the place folks, but you don’t react to them. And I know why you don’t react to them. Anyway, it says...)
This common adversary-remark is completely in the spirit of the Club of Rome’s 1993 The First Global Revolution in which the authors state:
(A: They said that in the seventies too...)
“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill….All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
(A: And remember what it says in the beginning— that’s the important part: In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea..." idea, folks..."that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill." So, you see, they were given the task by the United Nations and the big elite boys at the big foundations to find a way to unite the planet into this agenda so as it would seem more real to them. And, it says...)
To illustrate that in the case of professor Roger Dittmann we are not dealing with some isolated mad scientist in a cellar-lab, his own resume will suffice:
“He served on the Executive Board of the World Federation of Scientific Workers (WFSW), in which he has been active since 1967, and has represented the WFSW at the United Nations. He presides over the U.S. affiliate of the WFSW, the U.S. Federation of Scholars and Scientists, founded in 1937 as the American Association of Scientific Workers,
(A: It used to be an old communist organization...)
which is also affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). He has also served as Chair of the Southern California Federation of Scientists, on the National Council of the Federation of American Scientists, as well as on the Executive Board of the Pacific Division of the AAAS. He has extensive international contacts and experience, including working with UNESCO.”
A: So, I’ve gone through all the history of UNESCO too with Julian Huxley (that was Aldous’s brother) and his big speeches that he gave and from his own books as well – quite fascinating – because he was all on board with this back then. But most folk will never believe it, because, you see, you can’t believe something if you’re watching television— you can’t do it. You can’t watch horrific stuff happening and then tune into happy commercials about silly things like toothbrushes and they’re all smiling and having orgasms over this new toothbrush, and then you watch a comedy. And plus, you see, you have been trained – trained – to always turn away from the negative, things that make you feel unpleasant and unhappy; you’ve been trained. And the big boys talked about this too, like Russell. He says we’ll train the public to always seek pleasure and happiness, and always negate and shy away from the realistic stuff, the stuff that really matters; and that’s happened. So your ability for survival has already been damaged if not eliminated altogether with most folk. I’ll put this article up tonight at cuttingthroughthematrix.com for those who want to read all the rest of it, and there’s a lot of links there too, and it’s factual, and most folk won’t want to. They’ll go and vote for some new prune that they’ll put up for you to vote for, hoping (because people live in hope, you see, not realism and reality— they live in hope) that some guy is going to have a brain tumor or something and become a nice guy in politics. They’re all put in by the same organization that runs the world: The Council on Foreign Relations, which belongs to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, as does the Royal Society and a whole bunch of other things; and they also set up the United Nations, by the way.
And tonight too I want to put up some links about geo-engineering, from the government, and one of them here is to do with…
A: And it was a workshop they had at the Council on Foreign Relations – again, the guys that run the world and run all the media; and top scientists are members and they even have actors in it now too because you all follow celebrities because you can’t think straight and so they get actors on board as well. And it says, this was 2008, and it’s a summary of the need to inject “light-reflecting particles into the stratosphere”. Now, they were doing it constantly since 1998 but they’re still putting this stuff out to the lower-level members; again, it’s a form of psychic driving; the more you see these articles the more you think it’s real and they won’t have to tell you, "oh, by the way, we’ve already been doing it since 1998 anyway." This is to make you think that they’re maybe going to do it. These last few days I’ve watched them spraying us like bugs up here where I live. There was actually two weeks of blue sky – blue sky – like we used to get before 1998 came along, and it brought back some memories, that too. Most folk won’t remember, but they actually had real blue skies, not this fuzzy whitish stuff that they do from all their spray.
And I’ll also put up too another one to do with weather modification activities reports, and it’s from NOAA (you know) and it’s the official site and all the rest of it and it’s got the CFR citation at the end of it as well (because they’re into everything), but it’s got an initial report on weather modification activities, weather modification interim, and final report as well. I’ll put that up; there’s also two PDFs on that one itself that goes into a few things, they just touch on it. And also, ‘Geoengineering: Parts 1, 2 and 3; the Hearing Before the Committee on Science and Technology; House of Representatives,’ and it goes through a whole bunch of stuff on geoengineering as well, for those who think it’s all pie in the sky and whatever they’re doing it must be for our own good, obviously, even though they fudge all the figures and all the rest of it. You understand, weather has never been static; like you don’t hit a particular date and you’re in spring: that’s only on the calendar, it doesn’t happen in reality. You don’t always have a wet summer or a dry summer— it happens once in a while and that’s how things actually work. So, folk have no memory anymore because they don’t live outside and they don’t look up at all and they live in a controlled environment from their houses to their cars to their office or to the mall and they don’t really have anything to go by, by their own memory; that’s why it’s so easy to con and fool the public.
As China is expanding, so are its gangsters, moving out, and they’re also getting kicked out of countries now…
Angola has extradited 37 Chinese nationals, accused of extortion, kidnappings, armed robberies and running prostitution rings.
They allegedly targeted other Chinese, kidnapping businessmen for ransom and sometimes burying victims alive.
They lured women to Angola, promising well-paid jobs, but then forced them into prostitution, Chinese police said.
Tens of thousands of Chinese live in Angola, and Chinese state-run firms have large interests in the country.
China’s Ministry of Public Security said a special police team was sent to Angola in July to help investigate criminal gangs.
The ministry said the officers had helped their Angolan counterparts break up 12 gangs and free 14 victims, most of whom were thought to be women forced to work as prostitutes.
The 37 suspects arrived at Beijing airport in handcuffs with balaclavas covering their faces.
A: So, they’ll be for the chop; that’s how they do it over there because the only organized crime you can have is the government, you see— the same everywhere else.
And this one here is on ecosystems. CGIAR, it’s called, like cigar, almost like a cigar….
The CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems will be holding an official launch event at Stockholm Water Week on Tuesday, August 28 at 5.30 pm at the IWMI-CGIAR booth. The event will be an informal opportunity to socialize and learn more about the program. In addition, you can learn more about the program through talking with the Program Director....
The CGIAR Research Program on Water, Land and Ecosystems, one of CGIAR’s most ambitious research programs to date is a ten year commitment to bring about a radical transformation in the way land, water and natural systems are managed. It is one of the largest programs with 14 partners, including FAO and is being led by the International Water Management Institute,
(A: I’ll repeat that, "International Water Management Institute," for those who didn’t hear it very well.)
which has just been named this year’s Stockholm Water Prize Laureate.
A: They love giving prizes to each other because it will be the biggest boys out there that are backed by all the top ones, you see— all their own people. And it’s got a list of different directors, etcetera, etcetera, etcetera. And they’re tied in with other organizations too, as I say; that one to do with the International Water Management Institute— they’re also having a big festival this year as well, to get you used to the idea.
Australians, of course, are really getting hammered now with free trade and even the ex-treasurer came out last week and said that companies should just leave the country now if they want to make a profit, they’ll never make it in Australia and he’s advising all the businesses to pack up and move. They’re getting it all late, we had it a while ago, of course, because we signed the World Trade Organization’s treaties and the GATT treaty and all the rest of it. But now, of course, the same thing is happening there too. It says…
Laws passed today will allow authorities to collect and keep Australians’ internet records, including their web-browsing history, social media activity and emails.
(A: It also, by the way, does all their medical stuff as well, so, they have that, and they can also hand it off to private companies. So...)
The laws will also allow Australia to accede to the Council of Europe Convention on Cyber-crime, which has 34 members.
A: Cyber-crime means they’ve got to watch all of you, you see. Isn’t it wonderful? Isn’t it wonderful when you’re at the top and you can just use neurolinguistics to con the public until they can’t really figure it out... "Is that really what I think it is," you know. But that’s how life really is, folks.
In Britain too, you never got mosquitoes in Britain, but of course they bred them there because the old Porton Down laboratory was specializing in viral and bacterial warfare, as Canada was; Canada actually leads the world in it. And they actually took some of the big (we call them “bomber“) mosquitoes from Ontario; these ones are specially bred in a lab further south of me, even from World War II onto the present time and the bigger the mosquito, you see, the more you can load it up with more viruses, more bacteria for a loading dose: to get infected you’ve got to get a loading dose so the bigger the loading dose the better. They also sent them over to Britain. But you never got mosquitoes in Britain: you just didn’t get it. And this article was kind of funny because it says…
Britain’s washout summer brings a plague of mosquitoes and fleas to the UK
A: And even it says they’re "mozzies", "mozzies," like the nickname that you use in countries that you normally get them, as though they’d always had them in Britain, and I guess people now probably think they did always have them, but they’ve not. You understand, if you’re bringing down the population there’s no better vector than spreading disease by biting insects. They’ve got little needles, just like a little needle in their proboscis and it sticks right through into the vein or an artery or arterial and it will get the stuff right in there— it’s wonderful for spreading disease, and they’re going to use it down the road, you know, if not already.
And, another one too is called…
Integrating federal research on global change and climate change
(A: And it says...)
The U.S. Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office
(A: Do you understand, you have so many thousands of these organizations working 24 hours a day and they’ve been working for years and years and years to bring in their big system? And you go and vote for a guy that’s sold to you by the television, like you’re selling a product when you sell a president, you see. And you think they’re going to change anything? They’re all on board with it; that’s why they put them in. So...)
U.S. Global Change Research Program National Coordination Office (USGCRP NCO) works to support the various programs and initiatives for USGCRP through a team of dedicated professionals
(A: Who are awfully highly paid...)
with expertise in administration, coordination, planning, writing, and climate and environmental policy.
A: I’ll put this up tonight. It’s got the USGCRP NCO Staff, for those who didn’t know about it and it’s got all their names here, a whole bunch of them, and what they’re up to and all the rest of it. There’s just so much you just can’t keep up; there’s thousands of them, remember. The world’s not run by peoples and democracies voting. I hope you realize; I hope you’re getting the message.
Now the TSA, of course, with their groping, etcetera, had to come to this…
TSA frisks groom children to cooperate with sex predators, abuse expert says
An expert in the fight against child sexual abuse is raising the alarm about a technique the TSA is reportedly using to get children to co-operate with airport pat-downs: calling it a “game”.
Ken Wooden, founder of Child Lures Prevention, says the TSA’s recommendation that children be told the pat-down is a “game” is potentially putting children in danger.
Telling a child that they are engaging in a game is “one of the most common ways” that sexual predators use to convince children to engage in inappropriate contact, Wooden told Raw Story.
Children “don’t have the sophistication” to distinguish between a pat-down carried out by an airport security officer and an assault by a sexual predator, he said.
The TSA policy could “desensitize children to inappropriate touch and ultimately make it easier for sexual offenders to prey on our children,” Wooden added.
A: So, I think it’s all intentional (of course it is); it’s training them that you’re only a minutiae in the great big scheme of things.
Back with more after this...
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through the Matrix, and my satellite feed just went out there, but that’s ok, I can keep going.
And, this article here I’m reading right now is about the TSA pat-downs. Now listen, as I say, they’re told to tell the children that they’re playing games. “It’s just a game, children.” You understand, that’s how the elite talk to you as well? “It’s just a game, children,” you know. And it says…
Addressing the controversy over pat-downs of children last month, TSA regional security director James Marchand told the press the TSA was working on new practices to make children more comfortable during the pat-down process.
(A: As you’re being conditioned that you’re helpless, you see.)
“You try to make it as best you can for that child to come through. If you can come up with some kind of a game to play with a child, it makes it a lot easier,” said Marchand....
(A: Well, that’s how they do it with us. It makes it a lot easier— "it’s just a game," you know. That’s what the media does to you— it’s a game.
Wooden, who has testified before Congress on child safety issues on numerous occasions, says he was told by a TSA agent that the practice has been used.
A: Of course it’s used. So, that’s training the children and they’ll grow up thinking it’s all quite normal. Actually, by the time they grow up it probably will be normal even amongst themselves because now you have just orgies everywhere. Even the royalty’s all into it, as you saw last week, but that’s the new normal, isn’t it. Destruction of the family unit... your body doesn’t belong just to you and you must share it with others. You see, they’ve got it all worked out at the top, so there’ll be no hassle in the future as we go through, as the old ones die off, the old types die off— Mark 5 or 6 is going to die off and Mark 7 will take over, you see. And that’s really how it’s done.
Also tonight too I want to put up…
The History Of DHS Ammunition Purchases
A: And this is a good one because this site’s got it really all listed here going back over the last few years; the biggest purchases have been since Obama has been in— well over 50 percent more since he’s been in office but it doesn’t mean he’s doing it because he’s just a little front man too. But it’s just fantastic the kind of ammo they’re buying in, because, you see, they know there’s big troubles down the road as you refuse to give up your tap water to an international agency and you’re forced into austerity and maybe even rationing. They really, really want to bring rationing in, because they’ve actually said that, if they could only get into the rationing, like World War II, people would understand, it’s a kind of war situation, we’ve got a big thing to fight and we’ll all accept poverty and obedience to the government. So, it’s all working pretty, pretty good, you know.
Also too, it’s an old article, it was done in 1997-98; I mentioned it before and it says…
GLOBAL WARMING IS TOO SERIOUS TO BE LEFT TO THE POLITICIANS.
(A: For those who don’t believe it’s happening...)
HEREWITH A SCIENTIFIC SOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM. (IF THERE IS A PROBLEM, THAT IS.)
A: And that is basically a ‘Sunscreen for Planet Earth’— a sunscreen for planet earth...they were talking about that way back and they talked about all the different stuff, particles they’d put in the air. Mind you, this stuff too that’s supposed to reflect light back out, you see, like tiny little mirrors, it’s not as accurate as they say. It also traps the heat that comes to the earth and it reflects back out and it goes back and forth like a tennis ball between the earth and all these particles and the heat builds up (as those who have got a brain still functioning have noticed), even in these last few days, for instance. But they’re doing it anyway. And they know also as well because they’ve got constant records, constant updates, on all the medical problems daily across the world with the internet and so on, in medical files. They know the cull-off rate too from different people who can’t tolerate it as well as others; you’ll all get sick with it eventually, but certain ones will get sicker quicker. And that’s the real world, folks—that’s the real world. But don’t worry— go vote. Go vote and get played again like a sucker.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario Canada, it’s goodnight and may your God, or your Gods, go with you.
show covered in following links:
Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program--International Relations Program----University of Pennsylvania
Cull Human Population or Expect Vast Die-Offs
NOAA---Weather Modification Activities Reports
CFR Workshop on Geo-Engineering the Atmosphere
Geo-Engineering Parts 1, 2 and 3
Geo-engineering Cost Analysis
Angola Deports Chinese Gangsters
World Water Week 2012
Australia---Authorities have Power to Collect Citizens' Internet Records
British Mosquitoes---New Normal
Global Change National Co-ordination Office
TSA Frisks Groom Children to Co-operate with Sex Predators---Abuse Expert
History of DHS Ammunition Purchases
Edward Teller---Sunscreen for Planet Earth---1997