July 13, 2012 (#1128)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt July 13, 2012:
"Inconvenient History Goes Down Memory Hole
As Spinners from Marketing Achieve Their Goal,
The Past is Easily Updated, Such a Surprise,
Chunks of History Disappear Before Your Eyes,
Leaving Government, Spotless, You can Believe In,
Washing Away the Stench of Centuries of Sin,
Bernays Techniques are Ruling Our Minds,
Via All Media, Works on All Kinds,
When You're Old and Grey, Wording Slurred,
You'll Only have Memory that Bad Things Occurred"
© Alan Watt July 13, 2012
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt - July 13, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks. I am Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The Matrix on July 13, 2012. Newcomers, make sure that you make good use of cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. You’ll see a bunch of other sites listed on that page and if you find sticking downloads try the other ones because so many folk go into the .com at the same time. You’ll find all those sites have transcripts in English for print up as well as the audios and you can also go into alanwattsentientsentinel.eu for transcripts in other languages. Remember too, you are the audience that bring me to you. I don’t sell you things to make you grow back a third set of teeth or your hair grow back or anything like that. I don’t sell anything whatsoever, actually, except the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And I don’t have shares in any of the products sold, etc. So if you want to support me you can do so by buying the books and discs from the website. [Order and donation options listed above.] Remember, straight donations are really, really, awfully welcome in these austere times.
What I do is give you some of the histories of the big organizations that set out to take over the world over a hundred years ago and how they got together, formed their clubs, special branches of these clubs, and even had different ones for different parts of the plan, specializing for a hundred years to bring in the trading routes, the free trading deals that they called them a hundred years ago, and amalgamate whole continents together, like the European bloc for instance. And they haven’t stopped. We’re seeing the completion of it all; we’re living through it in our lifetime. We also see that it’s to be an authoritarian society because this club, with its United Nations front of course, which is part of it, has stated that, really, democracy doesn’t work. They will USE democracy while they conquer for the last few countries, but it really doesn’t work so there’ll be a façade of democracy to keep the public happy, but in reality it will be an authoritarian society under which you live. You’re under it now, of course, under the guise of terrorism. Remember, anything will do; the end justifies the means. That means causing the problems as well, of terror, and even if there isn’t any, and then using it to take all your rights away. Because they have a plan to ram through massive changes in your standards of living in a postconsumer society. There’s lots of stuff on their own websites from the net, if you look into the United Nations and just keep going around for days and days and days, you’ll find so much stuff from nongovernmental organizations that are funded by the big foundations, which are just the fronts for the big international banking boys; that’s how it’s really done. And of course these NGOs are told to lobby government to get the laws passed, which the big banking boys want passed. Because after all you see, the banking boys have been running the world for an awful, awful long time. These are the guys who picked up the gauntlet to do with eugenics and they ran with it, after Charles Darwin, because they want to bring in their world, run properly by academics and professors, specialists and things, so that we don’t screw it all up, like, you know, the people at the bottom will do if you let them think for themselves. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back. It’s interesting to see the big movements that have been encouraged to take over all of your rights: global warming, climate change, all the different names for the same con. And you know, cons have been pulled off, massive cons, all down through history. And the bigger the con actually the more it’s easily believed by most of the people – they can’t believe that so many people with straight faces would come on television and say this is so. So they hold onto their incredulity – they can’t let it go and say this is incredulous, it can’t be happening; so many folk wouldn’t lie to me. It’s a very easy trick and a lie told a thousand times becomes the norm; that’s what they’re taught in marketing as well. Anyway this is about…
Greenpeace co-founder Dr. Patrick Moore: 'Thank goodness we came along & reversed 150 million-year trend of reduced CO2 levels in global atmosphere. Long live the humans'
July 13, 2012 / Marc Morano – Climate Depot
Moore: 'CO2 is lower today than it has been through most of the history of life on earth...At 150 ppm CO2 all plants would die, resulting in virtual end of life on earth'
Greenpeace Co-Founder Dr. Patrick Moore commented a new study trying to explain the lack of global warming:
The new study claims: 'Abrupt increase' in CO2 absorption slowed global warming: Excerpt: 'The earth would have warmed faster in the last two decades had there not been an unexplained rise in the amount of carbon dioxide being absorbed on land, scientists believe.” Scientists have discovered an "abrupt increase'' since 1988 in the uptake of carbon dioxide (CO2) by the land biosphere, which comprises all of the planet's plant and animal ecosystems...the breakthrough had taken scientists "completely by surprise''...[study] explains how much CO2 is absorbed by plants and animals, with some of the CO2 then being passed from plants into the land." [End study excerpt]
Ecologist Dr. Moore pulled no punches in commenting on the new study: “These people are either completely naive about the relationship between CO2 and plants or they are making this up as a way of deflecting attention from the lack of warming for the past 15 years.” Moore is the author of the book, “Confessions of a Greenpeace Dropout: The Making of a Sensible Environmentalist,” in which he exposes the green movement and explains why he left the organization.
Moore told Climate Depot: "Plants grow much faster when CO2 is higher, the optimum concentration is between 1500-2000 ppm so there is a long way to go before plants are happy. CO2 levels in the atmosphere have continued to rise despite plants absorbing more CO2. So what is the 'scientists' point? It is to obfuscate, confuse, and otherwise muddy the waters with disinformation.
Moore continued: "We should challenge them to admit that CO2 is the most important nutrient for all life on earth and to admit that it is proven in lab and field experiments that plants would grow much faster if CO2 levels were 4-5 times higher in the atmosphere than they are today. This is why greenhouse growers pipe the exhaust from their gas and wood heaters back into the greenhouse to increase CO2 levels 3-5 times the level in the atmosphere, resulting in 50-100% increase in growth of their crops. And they should recognize that CO2 is lower today than it has been through most of the history of life on earth.
"There is no 'abrupt' increase in CO2 absorption, it is gradual as CO2 levels rise and plants become less stressed by low CO2 levels. At 150 ppm CO2 all plants would die, resulting in virtual end of life on earth.
"Thank goodness we came along and reversed the 150 million-year trend of reduced CO2 levels in the global atmosphere. Long live the humans,” Moore concluded.
So they’re jumping, everyone is jumping ship, and got their sense back, and it’s quite interesting to see what all is happening. Tonight too, I’m putting up a list to do with drones etc. It says…
The Pentagon's Vision: Drones Everywhere
theatlantic.com / Conor Friedersdorf / Jul 9 2012
AUTONOMOUS DRONES -- WILL A HUMAN ALWAYS PULL THE TRIGGER?
Throughout its 25-year plan on drones, the Department of Defense writes as if making our fleet ever more autonomous is both a major goal and an inevitability. One stated goal is to "support research and development activities to increase the level of automation in unmanned systems."
States another portion, "First and foremost, the level of autonomy should continue to progress from today's fairly high level of human control/intervention to a high level of autonomous tactical behavior that enables more timely and informed human oversight." This isn't as alarming when you realize that some drones will be completing tasks like clearing mines or getting supplies to wounded soldiers. Wouldn't it be great if those drones were ever more autonomous?
But this passage gave me chills:
For a significant period into the future, the decision to pull the trigger or launch a missile from an unmanned system will not be fully automated, but it will remain under the full control of a human operator. Many aspects of the firing sequence will be fully automated but the decision to fire will not likely be fully automated until legal, rules of engagement, and safety concerns have all been thoroughly examined and resolved.
Evidently meant to be reassuring, my takeaway was: Forget the timeline -- the Pentagon thinks bots will one day kill autonomously; that the law and safety issues will resolve; that killer drones are in our future.
(Alan: And they go on about…)
GROUND DRONES AND CROWD CONTROL
SHARING DRONE TECHNOLOGY WITH OTHER NATIONS
(A: ...is all part of it too, because we’re all one now apparently, you know; it happened overnight when you blinked. And they also went through some of the shortcomings of drones in the past. So I’ll put that link up.)
Plus I’ll put up another one to do with the drones itself as well from the military. It’s quite an interesting article; you’ll find it pretty informative, from the military itself, what they think about it all and where they plan to take you. And you can take that to the bank because they were predicting this stuff years ago. Every year they have their big think tanks come together and they come out with this kind of stuff for their future. Once that’s put on the table and put in print they aren’t going to deviate from anything at all. It doesn’t matter what comes, hell or high water, they’ll continue to go along with it. The Pentagon also says…
Pentagon: 'Gitmo drugged prisoners for their sake…then interrogated'
rt.com / 13 July, 2012
A recently-released Pentagon report admits to interrogating Guantanamo Bay prisoners after administering mind-altering treatments to them - often forcibly against their will - but stresses it was not done for the purposes of interrogation.
The report by the inspector general of the US Department of Defense obtained by truth-out.org under the Freedom of Information Act, found that some Gitmo inmates were questioned while receiving prescribed psychoactive treatments.
The Pentagon has tried to justify the facility staff’s actions, saying that “nowhere in the medical records did we find any evidence of mind-altering drugs being administered for the purpose of interrogation,” as the report states on page 13.
“The detainees were not given drugs as a means to facilitate interrogation,” insisted Pentagon spokesman Army Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale. (A: It goes on and on, repeats that.)
But the report does admit that “certain detainees, diagnosed as having serious mental health conditions being treated with psychoactive medications on a continuing basis, were interrogated.” (A: So that’s their way out of it, saying, you just classify them as mentally ill and you put them on your psychoactive drugs and then you interrogate them. That’s their legal way out of it. That’s what they’re up to. Quite amazing isn’t it?)
And so much is really getting rammed through because after all, this is the Century of Change – that’s what it’s been called for the last 50 years. We’re well into it. They had to kick it off with something to take all your rights away, which they did, and we’re going through the big changes, the planned changes of society, into the stages where specialists, in all areas, will run our lives from birth to death. It’s already happening, and further ahead in some countries than others. But here’s one to do with, it ties in with an article put out by the Department of Defence in Britain for NATO countries in 2008; the whole thing is in my website in the archives and I might put a link up tonight on it again. But they actually mentioned that countries will fade away gradually. They’ll get to a world government, for a short period of time, very short, and then they’ll end up with big super city-states, high-tech city-states. Well gee whiz, the United Nations’ Agenda 21 has come out with part of this too. It says…
Agenda 21 Dense MegaCities of the Future Already Underway
occupycorporatism.com / Susanne Posel / Jul 2nd, 2012
Michail Fragkias, chief scientist for the UIN’s “Planet Under Pressure” wants populations to be confined to mega-cities, locked up so they are easily controlled and mitigate further population growth.
Fragkias says: “If cities can develop in height rather than in width that would be much more preferable and environmentally not as harmful.”
According to the globalists at America2050 (A: And I’ll put a link up for that too.), “metropolitan regions will be an interlocking economic system, shared natural resources and ecosystems, and common transportation systems link these population centers together.” (A: They’re SuperCities, they’re called.)
Under Agenda 21, policymakers, businesses and community leaders will be used to enact changes to city structures including:
• Controlling public water allocation and distribution (A: I hope you all get that one folks, because it’s private corporations that are running your water already.)
• Coordinating transportation of goods from one megaregion to another
• Installing high-speed railing systems and approved eco-conscious transportation modes to mitigate CO2 emissions (A: ...that apparently are too low at the moment.)
• Protection of biodiversity by restricting human effects to nature
• Implementing tough economic and development strategies to make multi-use purposes in land distribution
Global Integration Zones will link regions to one another through specially designed transportation systems.
Dennis Frenchman, an architect and the professor of Urban Planning for MIT, asserts that city planners of the future must design cities that accommodate the large migration of people caused by population growth. (A: It’s not by population growth, because they’ve already said we are plummeting in the West; it’s massive immigration that keeps it up. What it really means is these cities are to cram most of the folk into, once they get rid of all the small towns and suburbia and all the rest of it, and you’re all crammed in these cities.)
Cities must be efficient, as defined by the UN’s Millennium Development Goals decree and UN’s Agenda 21 policies. (A: I’ll put up the links for that tonight.)
Hi folks, we’re back Cutting Through The Matrix. Also tonight I’ll put up a PDF for the UK with its Draft Communications Data Bill; it’s the latest stuff to do with their data collection on everyone. It’s quite easy to do because everyone wants to join social groups, and that’s why they’re put up there in the first place is because all the data is collected. Anything that goes through basically the ether is now owned by the guys that just grab it – that’s what they claim anyway. So they can take all your information from you, especially to do with those that have things in common – they’re under intense scrutiny by the big authorities, the Pentagon and NSA and everything else. So anyway I’ll put this one up tonight; it’s the June 2012 Draft Communications Bill and you can go through that.
Communications Data Bill - http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm83/8359/8359.pdf
Also, I'll put up this one and it’s...
Interdependence and Predictability of
Human Mobility and Social Interactions -
(A: This is from, again, from all of your social chat sites and so on that you all join. It goes through the amazing studies that they’ve been doing.)
The study of the interdependence of human movement and social ties of individuals is one of the most interesting research areas in computational social science. Previous studies have shown that human movement is predictable to a certain extent at different geographic scales. One of the open problems is how to improve the prediction exploiting additional available information. In particular, one of the key questions is how to characterise and exploit the correlation between movements of friends and acquaintances to increase the accuracy of the forecasting algorithms.
Now, they call it forecasting, because they got to know ALL about you. And people, as I say, use their tweets to each other – it’s all picked up immediately and put into your personality profile. But they also want to know who you work with, and who you’re friendly with, and why are you friendly with them, what do you have in common. And they do incredible in-depth analysis with all of their algorithms, to try to get things in common with you, etc. to make sure that you’re predictable. But you can’t stop people joining them; they go like lemmings to the sea. And it’s making it easier for government than ever before. I even read the article last night where the ex-FBI guy and CIA also said that basically all these social sites are doing most of our jobs for us now, because they don’t have to go scouring for information with spying, they’ve got it all put up there for free. So it’s your own problem if you do it. You know, you can’t stop folk doing it.
And this one here is on Melinda Gates...
Melinda Gates: Family Planning Means Sterilizing Women in Developing Nations
Susanne Posel / theintelhub.com / July 11, 2012
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) are hosting The London Family Planning Summit (LFPS) where they will purvey their depopulation and eugenics agenda in the name of women’s rights. (A: …for those who don’t quite get it yet, that’s what they call it, ‘women’s rights’, you know.)
Both governmental and private sector representatives will be in attendance; where not only will lucrative deals for provision of contraception will be made, but the BMGF (A: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation) will secure donated funds to bring their brand of depopulation to third world nations.
The BMGF (A: ...of course they’re always asserting scary numbers...) assert that by 2050 “the global population is expected to grow to over 9 billion people” and this is unacceptable to them. (A: It’s not going to grow because we’re plummeting in the West; most folk are going sterile anyway.)
By applying pressure to social programs and resources, the BMGF want to use family planning as an investment for all national governments globally.
Delegates at the LFPS will team up with non-governmental organizations like The White Ribbon Alliance for Safe Motherhood (WRA) wherein they have pledged to make sure policies and political leaders are properly swayed in the direction of support their campaign.
So a lot of women die of course from these abortions and all the rest of it too, but it doesn’t matter to them; nobody’s taking tally over in the third world countries. But you’re paying for it all. And you can go back to that particular order put out by Kissinger to depopulate the third world; it’s been going on all along under the guise of charitable foundations and philanthropy, etc... to help people, you understand.
Mexican Drug Cartel Laundered Money Through BofA, FBI Alleges
huffingtonpost.com / 07/09/2012
Well, this is like a recycled thing that happens all the time. They’ve been doing this... I read these articles 20 years ago, the same in Canada. The RCMP stated that if the big drug boys pulled their money out and stopped putting it through, all the banks in Canada would collapse; they said that years ago. So they know all about it, of course they know all about it because it’s part of the system that we’re supposed to have. Reality is utterly, completely different from anything you’ve been taught.
This is a good article by John Pilger and it’s about psychological operations. He says…
History is the enemy as 'brilliant' psy-ops become the news
johnpilger.com / 21 June 2012
(A: Psychological operations, you see, ARE the news now, for those who don’t know it. He starts off with Southern Vietnam which he was in even during the Vietnamese war and afterwards and he says…)
Arriving in a village in southern Vietnam, I caught sight of two children who bore witness to the longest war of the 20th century. (A: Soon that’ll be outdone with this one here, starting with Gulf War 1 and then 2.) Their terrible deformities were familiar. All along the Mekong river, where the forests were petrified and silent, small human mutations lived as best they could. (A: …alongside the river.)
Today, at the Tu Du paediatrics hospital in Saigon, a former operating theatre is known as the "collection room" and, unofficially, as the "room of horrors". It has shelves of large bottles containing grotesque foetuses. During its invasion of Vietnam, the United States sprayed a defoliant herbicide on vegetation and villages to deny "cover to the enemy". This was Agent Orange, which contained dioxin, poisons of such power that they cause foetal death, miscarriage, chromosomal damage and cancer. (A: And when we come back from this I’ll go into the mutations that are still going on over there. Back with more after this break.)
Hi folks, I’m back Cutting Through The Matrix, talking about the disruption of the DNA sequencing, basically, in countries that were soaked with Agent Orange, which is still used today in some countries; I think Britain even uses a brand of it too, of course they don’t call it Agent Orange anymore. But it’s known to really disrupt the sequencing of DNA and your chromosomes and they got all these different… Often too, it will go into many generations; some of them get worse with every generation in fact. Remember, this stuff too, Agent Orange, is from Dow Chemical Company that also works with Monsanto to make all their pesticides. Anyway, it says:
Today, at the Tu Du paediatrics hospital in Saigon, a former operating theatre is known as the "collection room" and, unofficially, as the "room of horrors". It has shelves of large bottles containing grotesque foetuses. During its invasion of Vietnam, the United States sprayed a defoliant herbicide on vegetation and villages to deny "cover to the enemy". This was Agent Orange, which contained dioxin, poisons of such power that they cause foetal death, miscarriage, chromosomal damage and cancer.
In 1970, a US Senate report revealed that "the US has dumped [on South Vietnam] a quantity of toxic chemical amounting to six pounds per head of population, including woman and children". The code-name for this weapon of mass destruction, Operation Hades (A: They really love these names; it tells you who runs your world, eh. Operation Hades...), was changed to the friendlier Operation Ranch Hand. (A: You know, ‘I’m an old ranch-hand from the Rio Grande,’ that kind of stuff; it sounds much pleasanter, because they must give you psycholinguistics to make things acceptable to the general public.) Today, an estimated 4.8 million victims of Agent Orange are children.
Len Aldis, secretary of the Britain-Vietnam Friendship Society, recently returned from Vietnam with a letter for the International Olympic Committee from the Vietnam Women's Union. The union's president, Nguyen Thi Thanh Hoa, described "the severe congenital deformities [caused by Agent Orange] from generation to generation". She asked the IOC to reconsider its decision to accept sponsorship of the London Olympics from the Dow Chemical Corporation, which was one of the companies that manufactured the poison and has refused to compensate its victims.
Aldis hand-delivered the letter to the office of Lord Coe, chairman of the London Organising Committee. He has had no reply. When Amnesty International pointed out that in 2001 Dow Chemical acquired "the company responsible for the Bhopal gas leak [in India in 1984] which killed 7,000 to 10,000 people immediately (A: It was an amazing thing that happened there.) and 15,000 in the following twenty years", David Cameron described Dow as a "reputable company". (A: ...of course, because they sponsor him.) Cheers, then, as the TV cameras pan across the £7 million decorative wrap that sheathes the Olympic stadium: the product of a 10-year "deal" between the IOC and such a reputable destroyer.
History is buried with the dead and deformed of Vietnam and Bhopal. And history is the new enemy. On 28 May, President Obama launched a campaign to falsify the history of the war in Vietnam. (A: That’s what Orwell said, they always change the histories. So for the hard of thinking I’ll repeat that...) On 28 May, President Obama launched a campaign to falsify the history of the war in Vietnam. To Obama, there was no Agent Orange, no free fire zones (A: …where you could kill everything that moved…), no turkey shoots, no cover-ups of massacres, no rampant racism, no suicides (as many Americans took their own lives as died in the war), no defeat by a resistance army drawn from an impoverished society. It was, said Mr. Hopey Changey, "one of the most extraordinary stories of bravery and integrity in the annals of [US] military history". (A: That’s how it’s turned out to be, just pure bravery, you see, and no suicides, no racism, no massacres and no free-fire zones, where they killed everything that moved. Nope, just brave guys.)
The New York Times article was not a leak or an expose. It was a piece of PR designed by the Obama administration to show what a tough guy the 'commander-in-chief' can be in an election year. If re-elected, Brand Obama (A: ...and it’s a good name for it too, Brand Obama... you get different brands of them, you see.) will continue serving the wealthy, pursuing truth-tellers (A: ...that’s whistleblowers…), threatening countries, spreading computer viruses (A: ...which they did with the Stuxnet and the Flame...) and murdering people every Tuesday.
The threats against Syria, co-ordinated in Washington and London, scale new peaks of hypocrisy. Contrary to the raw propaganda presented as news, the investigative journalism of the German daily Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung identifies those responsible for the massacre in Houla as the 'rebels' backed by Obama and Cameron. The paper's sources include the rebels themselves. This has not been completely ignored in Britain. Writing in his personal blog, ever so quietly, Jon Williams, the BBC world news editor, effectively dishes his own 'coverage', citing western officials who describe the 'psy-ops' operation against Syria as 'brilliant'. As brilliant as the destruction of Libya, and Iraq, and Afghanistan.
And as brilliant as the psy-ops of the Guardian's latest promotion of Alastair Campbell, the chief collaborator of Tony Blair in the criminal invasion of Iraq. In his "diaries", Campbell tries to splash Iraqi blood on the demon Murdoch. There is plenty to drench them all. But recognition that the respectable, liberal, Blair-fawning media was a vital accessory to such an epic crime is omitted and remains a singular test of intellectual and moral honesty in Britain.
How much longer must we subject ourselves to such an "invisible government"? This term for insidious propaganda, first used by Edward Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and inventor of modern public relations, has never been more apt. "False reality" requires historical amnesia, lying by omission and the transfer of significance to the insignificant. In this way, political systems promising security and social justice have been replaced by piracy, "austerity" and "perpetual war": an extremism dedicated to the overthrow of democracy. Applied to an individual, this would identify a psychopath. Why do we accept it?
He says. But the part about Obama, is every Tuesday he picks the guys himself – according to the press, for their public relations, he’s a tough guy you see; this is the impression they’re trying to give you. Every Tuesday they all meet and Obama picks the guys in the pictures he doesn’t like, who get bombed by drones. So he personally selects those who get murdered, you see, for those who didn’t know that. All public relations, to make him a strong man, you see, a strong man.
New ground-based laser can extend drone flight time indefinitely
endthelie.com / Madison Ruppert
(A: They took an old idea by Tesla of transferring energy and they’re using a laser to do it.)
Lockheed Martin, one of America’s largest war profiteers (A: ...and aren’t they ever. They’re also doing your census for your countries, in the US and Canada, and they also get hold of your tax profiles; so they get the contract and then they ship it off to India to get done there.), has demonstrated technology in partnership with LaserMotive which can extend the flight time of their “Stalker” drone by 2,400 percent using a ground-based laser and potentially allow the drone to stay in the air indefinitely.
With drones being used by the military in league with law enforcement and with the practice set to expand across United States, this could be a great way to keep surveillance on potential criminals around the clock, or just monitor traffic. (A: Well of course, it’s to monitor all of you.)
This technology, which admittedly sounds like pure science fiction, uses a proprietary method to wirelessly transfer energy via laser light over long distances, in this case from the ground to the Stalker as it flies.
The Stalker is a relatively small electrically-powered unmanned aerial system (UAS) which runs on batteries now extended by over 48 hours.
It is launched by hand, powered by a propeller and maneuvered in flight via Xbox 360 controller and a camera which relays live video to the soldier’s computer.
Then it gives you a video, so you can see the Lockheed Martin promotional video, in action, apparently targeting the law enforcement agencies. Amazing too, the people who read all this stuff, they’re just enamored by all the sciences, eh. They don’t understand what’s really going on.
Facebook Monitors Your Chats for Criminal Activity
mashable.com / Alex Fitzpatrick /Jul 12, 2012
Facebook and other social platforms are watching users' chats for criminal activity and notifying police if any suspicious behavior is detected, according to a report.
The screening process begins with scanning software that monitors chats for words or phrases that signal something might be amiss, such as an exchange of personal information or vulgar language. (A: Well look at Hollywood for vulgar… of course they don’t say it is, no. You know, you’re ‘uninhibited’; you’ve got to be uninhibited if you’re in Hollywood, and so you must use that uninhibited, profane language all the time.)
The software pays more attention to chats between users who don't already have a well-established connection on the site and whose profile data indicate something may be wrong, such as a wide age gap. The scanning program is also "smart" -- it's taught to keep an eye out for certain phrases found in the previously obtained chat records from criminals including sexual predators. (A: So it’s all to stop the sexual predators, who are all up there, and at the top of every government.)
If the scanning software flags a suspicious chat exchange, it notifies Facebook security employees, who can then determine if police should be notified. (A: The cops are scanning them anyway.)
Keeping most of the scanned chats out of the eyes of Facebook employees may help Facebook deflect criticism from privacy advocates, but whether the scanned chats are deleted or stored permanently is yet unknown. (A: Well, because it’s unknown that means... because if they destroyed it they’d tell it, right? So it’s still being kept.)
The new details about Facebook's monitoring system came from an interview which the company's Chief Security Officer Joe Sullivan gave to Reuters. (A: …this little talk here.) At least one alleged child predator has been brought to trial directly as a result of Facebook's chat scanning, according to Reuters' report. (A: They always use the same thing, it’s for the children. What a bunch of liars and hypocrites, eh?)
When asked for a comment, Facebook only repeated the remarks given by Sullivan to Reuters: "We've never wanted to set up an environment where we have employees looking at private communications, so it's really important that we use technology that has a very low false-positive rate." (A: Well, going back to that previous one I mentioned too, and how they’re actually using programs and algorithms to see how predictable you are. They’re all at it, every single one of them.)
Navy Beginning To Implement Underwater Drones In Gulf
washington.cbslocal.com / July 12, 2012
Amid concerns of Iran closing the Strait of Hormuz during a potential crisis, the U.S. Navy is beginning to develop and release a set of underwater drones to find and destroy sea mines present in the Persian Gulf, according to U.S. officials.
Multiple news outlets reported Thursday that tensions concerning Iran’s nuclear program set in motion the reinforcement of U.S. military personnel and weaponry in the region, specifically in the form of the “SeaFox,” a four-foot, 88-pound unmanned, underwater surveillance vehicle that’s guided by a remote control.
In February, the Navy implemented dozens of SeaFox drones after an immediate request by Marine Gen. James Mattis, the head U.S. commander serving in the Middle East, according to media reports. The underwater drones have been arriving in recent weeks, not a coincidence considering the talks between the U.S. and Iran over the fate of Iran’s nuclear development program have stalled. (A: Yet Iran is not going to be allowed to have their own energy supply, you see; that’s really what it is. You can have only ‘one.’ There must ONLY BE ONE... Remember that? It’s throughout all the movies, there can only be one. I wonder who that would be? In that area?)
Another article here is to do with an America militiaman who warns Congress to back off, basically. He tells them during an inquiry that people are getting just too fed up and nervous with all the black-clad thugs that bash down doors, invade people’s property and so on. So you can give your own thoughts to it and see what you think; it’s up to you.
American Militiaman Warns Congress to Back Off – Lawful Rebellion and Common Law Courts Being Proposed - sovereignindependentuk.co.uk
And we are really going through amazing times though, amazing times as this rampages ahead... as we’re all getting taught to simply obey and put your hands up, or lie on the floor, or drop your pants at the airports. Another article about Britain’s cannibalism problem too, it’s all over the place now you see.
Pair disembowelled rapist at Durham's Frankland Prison
bbc.co.uk / 12 July 2012
...and then they thought they’d eat him as well. So it’s all the rage, you see. Maybe it’s this rotten meat that they’re selling in the supermarkets today; you don’t know what you’re eating anymore. I mean, who knows what it is, eh. And…
Police Minister Nick Herbert [in Britain] announces criminal justice plans
bbc.co.uk / 13 July 2012
Basically what it is, it’s to do with changing the court systems and the laws to rush through, like convict, convict, convict, convict one after another for the next expected riots. So they’re altering everything; no more courts basically, no more juries, and just fine on the spot or straight into prison from there. That’s the new system of justice. Because they’re expecting as I say more and more riots as time goes on into austerity. The evidence is there in Greece, look at it.
And another article to do with...
CAFR SCHOOL: How Corporations Are Funded By Taxpayers
Quite a good article. It tells you that every country basically, every town, every city has investments across the planet. And also that everybody’s pension plans are tossed into this big global casino. And everyone’s to blame eventually, because they’re all profiting one way or another with the money that comes back as pensions for the taxpayers. It’s not just the old folk, it’s for everybody though. I’ll put the link up regardless.
And it’s true enough. I mean, corporations are funded by taxpayers and they always have been. Because they have big, big building plans and they always get the government aid to do it. The first guys in the US, really, and elsewhere, in Canada, was to do with building railroads. They simply gave the land to the corporations, all of it, for free, and then helped fund them to build the railroads themselves, and then again gave them the railway lines free, and they still have that today. It’s not bad being a bigwig, you know, when you get everything for free from the peasantry that pays for it all.
And the Council on Foreign Relations, I’ve mentioned so much about it. If you go into their own websites you’ll find they give you what will become major mainstream news, and in all the other papers, because you see, their boys belong to all the other papers. All the other papers’ main journalists belong to the Council on Foreign Relations, which is just the American branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs for the globalists. So they come out with…
Can Banking Plan Aid Eurozone?
cfr.org / July 12, 2012
(A: So it’s all to ‘help people’, now that they’ve had all these crashes and stuff. They’re pushing for this long-planned-for event to unify all of the banking system under one authority.)
Eurozone leaders are pushing ahead with plans for a single banking authority (WSJ) (A: ...that was from the Wall Street Journal. This is from the CFR’s website so it tells you that all these journalists are part of the CFR.) situated in the European Central Bank, a first step toward developing a eurozone banking union. The new banking supervisor would be able to activate the permanent euro rescue fund--the European Stability Mechanism--to directly recapitalize struggling eurozone banks, rather than channeling funds through national treasuries and adding to a country's debt burden, says the Brookings Institution's Domenico Lombardi. (A: No, you don’t have to put it through your own central bank; we’ll put it through the EU central bank and we’ll let the IMF do all your bookkeeping, in your EX-countries. You used to have countries and nations – they’re still calling them states at the moment, but that will wither away too.) This new banking oversight system could prove vital for Spain, which is expected to receive a €100 billion ($1.23 billion) EU bailout to rescue its flailing financial sector. "As the Europeans set in motion this framework over the next few months, the remaining part of this €100 billion could be channeled through this innovative mechanism," Lombardi notes.
So they want to make it streamlined so as every country will get a demand by the central bank to pay up so much to bail out other countries. This is like forever. They plan to do this forever, this scam. They just go to Britain and say we want so many million from you this week, on Friday, and under the law that they’ve all signed you have to pay it up, no matter how much they ask you for, or where they put the money across the planet. Or guess what? The EU fines you; the citizenry of the whole country pays a massive fine. We’re all owned lock, stock and barrel. Back with more after this.
Hi folks, I’m back and we’ll go to Zack from New England if he’s still on the line. Are you there Zack?
Zack: Yeah, hi, how are you doing Alan?
Alan: Not bad at all.
Zack: Good to hear. Well, I had a question for you actually. You mentioned Orwell and him changing history in 1984, and there was something that you mentioned when I called maybe a couple of years ago about Will Durant and how he... You said that he killed himself and then killed his wife because he had some epiphany that he realized that the world that was being...
Alan: ...portrayed, yeah...
Zack: ...created around us, we would be unable to overcome, or something like that? Anyway, I looked up in the New York Times because I happened to see... I went to this church function; there’s a Catholic Fortnight for Freedom that they were doing for religious freedom against the health care stuff so I was curious and I happened to hear somebody who was teaching theology at a local Catholic university, and he happened to have a mason ring on, on his finger by the way, so I don’t know how that fits in with Catholicism but anyway, he was mentioning at the door something about Will Durant that I overheard the conversation of. And it just came to mind and I looked it up and sure enough in the New York Times there’s nothing to it that there was a murder/suicide. They mention that he died three weeks after his wife and they said apparently he died never knowing that his wife had died three weeks earlier. Was the ‘apparently’ the big giveaway there?
Alan: Oh yeah, absolutely, because in one of the actual… They keep reprinting those collections of books that he wrote. Remember, the Rockefellers sent out the Durants with a massive team to try and collect the histories of the world to present to the public in a way that we’d give up all our rights, actually, saying mankind was unstable, they’d need scientific training and all the rest of it, exactly what we’re going through today. And at the end of it all, Durant wrote off... He got so fed up. He says we’re leaving people with no hope whatsoever. He says, this is going to be like a miserable system we’re bringing in if they believe that we must be run and ruled by experts. So he wrote off to Stalin and Churchill and the US president as well, and in one of his books you’ll see a whole page there dedicated to that, from his own pen; he actually puts the page in there where he asked them all to change their ways and not go down this path of indoctrinating the public into basically a spun type of history. Because every story you look at it’s just big guys arising and becoming too big for their boots and slaughtering lots of people. He never goes into the fact that it’s all coordinated in the 20th century, and even before that, by the very organizations like the Rockefellers that were funding him to give this fake history. So they actually were found in their hotel room dead, both of them, in the original documentation. That’s what they called it, was a suicide, after none, not one of the top people that he’d met personally, like Stalin and Churchill, not one of them would send a reply back and say that they would help promote a different kind of society than the one that the Rockefeller, that was his paymaster, wanted. So yeah, they’re always changing history. Always changing history.
Zack: Yep. Yeah, the ‘apparently’ was a dead giveaway for me. Anyway, thanks for that piece of info because I wouldn’t have found it out on my own.
Alan: Yeah, that’s right. Thanks for calling. And also too, look at the old stuff by Trotsky giving lectures, in Yiddish actually, in New York – I’ve got the original newspaper, not copies but the original ones here – where he gives lectures to massive mobs in New York for revolution overseas. Where do you see that mentioned today? Who was funding him? Big bankers.
From Hamish and myself from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your God or your Gods GO with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Greenpeace Co-founder Blasts Warmists and CO2 Scammers
Pentagon's Vision---Pervasive Drones Everywhere
US Military Unmanned Systems Road-map up to 2034
Agenda 21 and Dense Mega-Cities of the Future Underway
UN Millennium Development Goals
Housing for Next Generation in NYC
Study on---Interdependence and Predictability of Human Mobility and Social Interactions
Melinda Gates and Sterilizing the Third World
Mexican Drug Cartel laundered Money Through Bank of America (What's New?)
History is the Enemy as Psy-Ops Become the News
Recharging Drones in Flight by Laser
Underwater Drones in Gulf
Facebook Monitoring for Criminal Activity
American Militiaman Warns Congress to Back Off from Police State Imposition
UK Court Revamp to Quickly Deal with Riots
How Corporations Are Funded By Taxpayers
European Banking Plan---CFR
DCDC Strategic Trends 2007-2036 report