March 28th, 2012 (#1053)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through The Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt March 28th, 2012:
Most Think Democracy's Just Dandy
Unaware 'twas Assassinated at Starting Line:
"Big Societal Changes Come From Foundations
Which Finance Councils Like Foreign Relations,
Darwin Gave Fuel that the Fittest were Best,
Naturally Endowed to Rule Over the Rest,
World's Money Lenders Took This as a Sign
That They were the Capstone of Plan Divine,
Setting Up Tax-Free Foundations, Philanthropic,
They'd Finance Institutions for Every Topic,
Then Guide Governments' Objectives and Policies
While Their Media Barons Brainwash Majorities,
Such Philanthropies Do All Interconnect,
A Myriad of Fronts so We'd Never Suspect,
Most of the People, in Truth, are Not Confided,
To Major Changes in Life Being Minutely Guided"
© Alan Watt March 28th, 2012
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – March 28th, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 28th of March, 2012. For newcomers, I always suggest you make use of the website cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and if you can struggle through the over a thousand audios for download, you’ll really understand the system you’re born into, and you’ll learn that nothing happens on a big scale, a world scale, even a national scale by chance. There are big organizations that have been running the world for a long time. And these organizations work outside governments. They have, most of their members in fact, a lot of their members in governments. They place them there. And they’ve been there for a hundred years, going towards what’s often called a New World Order. It’s a new planned society, a World Order, across the whole planet. And they’re backed by the biggest international moneylenders in the world, who started the whole thing up, of course, and they use universities and various other institutions and foundations to attain their goals. They can work in centuries, in fact. Remember, one foundation with maybe one or two directions to go in and two objectives to fulfill can go for two hundred years and never change their aim, their sites. They never get off their site. They can keep pushing and pushing and ultimately get what they want done in society. So, remember, nothing happens, in fact, your government really is almost a rubber stamp and a show for the public to believe in. That’s what your government is reduced to today, basically. They rubber-stamp the big instructions that come down from the United Nations organizations, which the foundations work through. In fact, they own them. And basically, that’s how things are done in this world.
So, help yourself to the audios, and remember you bring me to you, because I’m not backed by advertisers. I could be, certainly, and I’d be better off too if I did, but I’d also be kind of beholden to them as well. It kind of restricts your speech in some areas, so it’s up to you if you want to keep me going. You can buy the books and discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com, and you can donate as well. From the US to Canada, go into the website. You’ll find out how to do it. You can still use a personal check to Canada, from the States, and you can also use an international postal money order from your post office in the States as well. You can send cash, or you can use PayPal. Across the world, you’re stuck with Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal, once again.
As I say, what I do here is chronicle the events, go back to the past to show you the different organizations and foundations that were set up in the late 1800s and the beginning of the 20th century, actually, and they’ve never, ever stopped. Every prime minister, every president that’s been in power since the late 1800s has been a member of an organization that ultimately was called the Council on Foreign Relations or the Royal Institute for International Affairs, for Britain. They have these organizations across the whole planet, and you haven’t been run by your own government, you haven’t had your own government for an awful long time. And that’s just a fact.
And as I say too, there’s a big plan too, and if you understand the past, where it all came from and the foundations that were worked or set up by these rich powerful people, so-called philanthropists, you’ll find that they’ve shaped the direction of the world for over a hundred years, well over a hundred years. And that’s in all fields too, medicine, even down to euthanasia today. Specialized foundations have funded the whole movement and put out their massive writings on why we should do it, over a century, for over a century. Same with integration of the continent of Europe into one big system, and the same with the North American agreements as well. That was all drafted up an awful long time ago, all these plans. So, you’re living through a script. If you understand the script, you’ll know what’s coming, and nothing at all will ever shock you. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. I’ve talked quite a bit in the past about different characters who became famous through their positions in society. And of course, the Huxley family is definitely a very interesting family. Julian Huxley, who became the first CEO of UNESCO at the United Nations, basically wrote an awful lot about bringing down the world’s population, especially of the ones that they deemed unfit, in other words, or there was too many of, they claimed. Too many of the wrong kind, you see. And it’s never changed, eugenics, never ever changed its goal. And it slowed down a bit from World War II. They had to change a lot during that time, because after what they found out the Nazis were doing, they couldn’t very well carry on in the same vein. But they actually did. They changed their names and went underground for a bit, but kept working in the foundations towards the same goal, a system where eventually only the better types, you know, the better types eugenically, and with the right IQs, will be allowed to survive. That kind of thing. And it’s very much at the top of the tree with all the goals.
When you really understand all the different goals, coming through the United Nations, you can link that one part together with them all. They all want this perfect society. And they’re talking of course about the public as being economic units in this big, big society, this great society they call it. And ultimately, you’ll all be paying your carbon taxes and everything else because you’re the source, supposedly, of all the problem. They’re already penalizing or talking about penalizing people in Australia if they’d have more than two children, because you see, China is set up to be the model for the world with its one child per family policy. But it all ties together. You’ve got to understand this big web that’s out there and that literally encompasses the entire planet and of foundations with all their goals. And as I said at the beginning, they can take a hundred years, two hundred years, getting their propaganda out and then legitimizing themselves by big grants to universities and getting departments inside universities working for them, for sometimes a hundred years or more. That’s how you change the world.
You don’t change the world by yelling and screaming at everything that comes along the pike, especially if you don’t have the cash to put it into practice, what you’re opposing or whatever. You’ve got to have big, big money. And these foundations are tax-free, exempt. And of course, the Big Boys who created them already ran countries because they owned the countries financially by the way. They were the international bankers.
If you go into what’s happening recently, or at least been given propaganda recently, it’s to do with euthanasia. And of course, they started of course with abortion. That was the first part. They said this a hundred years ago. If we can get abortion approved then that further weakens man on the tree of life, basically, they called it at that time. Eventually, Julian Huxley said, we can knock man off his pedestal as being the prime ultimate creature on the planet and reduce him to the level of the animals. Once they train you through a generation or two that that’s just the way it is, you’re just another animal, and that’s what you’re going to get in regular media, even in entertainment, you’ll get that over and over again, those kind of statements, then they’re training you to accept the next part which is euthanasia of the elderly. And now it’s coming in. You see, they’re saying they’re so broke, every country is just so broke they can’t take care of the elderly. Now, these are the same governments that were pushed by the same foundations to make sure that both male and female went out to work. Before that people took care of their own elderly. You didn’t need all these homes. You didn’t have them. In fact, the homes, throughout the USA especially were funded by the mafia. They were the first ones to bring in old-age homes. That was the way they laundered their cash through. But of course, they had ties with some of these foundations as well.
So, you start at the young, and then you go for the elderly, and then you can go down into the middle part, basically, those who aren’t just quite up to snuff, basically, as good citizens, the perfect citizens. The whole thing is to make you believe that you’re unworthy in some form or another. And, of course, the other part which they’ve been hammering, these same foundations under other guises had been existing, before the 20th Century, they were hammering at the churches to destroy that, because that gave man, even the poorest of people, the right to believe that they had, they were higher than the animals, and you couldn’t treat them as an animal.
That’s gone out the window today. Society is pretty brutish. We can see that by the recruits now they get into the military, who want to go off and kill folk, just like video games. Across the world they’re like this. And we treat each other in kind of nasty ways. That’s not really human at all. So many wars went on prior to getting down to euthanasia, and now they’re at the stage where they announce it openly, in Australia and Britain, and the British Commonwealth countries in general at the same time. Not surprising, is it? Because that’s the old British Empire, and it’s still part of the Commonwealth whether you like it or not. So, it’s coordinated. And you have coordinated attacks in the media. And it seems to overwhelm the average Joe, who doesn’t think too much. That’s true, there’s a lot of folk who don’t think very much at all, and they say, “well, I guess it’s the right thing, because Australia is doing it and Britain is doing it, and so-and-so is doing it, at the same time. It must be very important.” And that’s how they go along with things, you see.
So, here’s a little history to the Eugenics society and to do with dying for the elderly. As I say, it was essential to get us dehumanized by first going into mass abortion and approving that, and then, of course, you dehumanize, we dehumanize ourselves, by allowing that to happen, because life is cheaper now. Life doesn’t have the same sacredness it had before. Here’s some of the histories.
In 1931 Dr Charles Killick Millard, Medical Officer of Health for Leicester gave a presidential address to the Society of Medical Officers of Health, on voluntary euthanasia.
(Alan: This is 1931.)
His speech was printed in pamphlet form with an introduction by Sir William Arbuthnot Lane.
(A: His name was.)
Millard advocated the passing of an Act of Parliament to legalise euthanasia on a voluntary basis for the terminally ill, and included the draft of a bill with his paper.
(A: But by the way, they also had to go further. First you get the public to accept one thing, “well, I can see the point sometimes, you know,” but they actually wanted to go a lot further, because we’re all economic units, and you see, we unfortunately take taxpayers’ money that the governments really want for other purposes, like wars and things, or having big meetings with their 20-course dinners and stuff like that, so they want the money from you that they would put on you to treat you in hospital and just euthanize you instead. It’s a lot cheaper. And it says here:)
and included the draft of a bill with his paper.
In 1935 the Voluntary Euthanasia Legalisation Society was founded in Leicester with C J Bond as Chairman, Charles Killick Millard as Honorary Secretary and Lord Moynihan as President and in 1936 the first Voluntary Euthanasia (Legalisation) Bill was introduced into Parliament.
(A: In Britain.)
In 1941 the membership of the Society was over 1000 but the activities of the Society were curtailed by the War.
(A: World War II.)
Also to counteract the bad name given to euthanasia by Hitler's policies, the Society found it necessary to issue a statement pointing out that they only advocated euthanasia on a strictly voluntary basis for the already dying.
(A: So, they kind of back-pedaled a wee bit.)
In 1949 the Society petitioned the United Nations to include the right to voluntary euthanasia in the Declaration of Human Rights.
(A: I hope you all know that you’re under the Declaration of Human Rights from the United Nations. If any of you haven’t read it, you should read it. You’ve got to read it. Anyway, it says:)
The Society became known as EXIT but reverted to the Voluntary Euthanasia Society and continued to campaign for the right of individuals to a death with dignity and to propagate this controversial subject. In 2006 the Society changed its name to Dignity in Dying.
And I’ll put some of this stuff up tonight for those who want to go through it. And most folk won’t go through it, because they say, “well, you know, I’m still 30s and whatever, and I’m okay. I’m okay, Jack.” That’s how you all think until it’s your turn. But it’s going to come down to the stage too, and it’s already been discussed, oh, we can’t afford to treat people the same way we used to treat in hospitals, including the younger folk, you see. Because they’re putting you all, all of us, into brackets of age-group and importance to society. You’re literally going to get graded into your importance to your community and society, versus how much it’s going to cost to treat you for whatever is wrong with you. So, life has become cheap, and eventually we’ll become like China, very cheap indeed. As long as we’re well entertained, most folk won’t notice, and they won’t miss their friends disappearing around them.
Now, you see, you cannot introduce into the hands of government, a tool and a power to do with killing people off. Governments are awfully good at getting folk killed as you know by all the wars. And they have social policies and different policies on the go and political policies and agendas, so to hand them this kind of tool to start killing people off is an incredibly, incredibly dangerous thing. They’ve already slashed National Health Services to the bone, because they want everything to be cost effective, as I say. And for the general population, they really are angry now about the kind of money they have to spend or give back from the taxpayer to treat the taxpayer. They want it all. Mind you, if it’s some high chutzpah who gets sick, some Lord Whoever, they’ll spare no expense to make them better. But not for you. And this is a reality that’s come. If you go into hospitals in Britain and elsewhere and look at their charts, you’ll find who to resuscitate and who not to resuscitate. That’s your class and status in society, for those that don’t know.
It’s all run by big, incredibly big foundations, and of course, this one here, this Voluntary Euthanasia Society, now Dignity with Dying as it’s called now, is part of the Wellcome Trust. And you’ve got to go into the history of the Wellcome Trust and the multi-million, I think it was 11.4 million pounds they started it off with, back in the 20s, the 1920s, but it’s now worth trillions of dollars. And they’re heavily involved in social policy in medicine, across the world. That’s how you run the world. You don’t vote people in folks. You put them in, if you’ve got the cash. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix, and I should remember too, before I forget that the Wellcome Trust, as they call it, that pushes for all this stuff, has got fingers in every pie, to do with medicine and so on, and euthanasia, they were a big pharmaceutical company at one time, and they merged with Burroughs, I think it was called, and then became part of one of the GlaxoSmithKline company, and then they dropped out. So, they’ve got big stakes, you see, for everything that they do, I mean financially too.
Another article too is about:
Pay TV piracy hits News
(A: And like everything else in the world, people get off with, well, pretty well murder, in fact, if you’re the right kind of people to get off with it, you have the status and power in society. And we’ve all heard about Rupert Murdoch and his dealings, but only a little bit, you know, a very little bit of what he was up to, because Murdoch was involved with Israeli intelligence and with other groups too, to make sure that he got basically a foothold over all communication in media, to lead all media down the thoughts we’re supposed to have and get led down, because our thoughts are given to us via the media. Most folk believe everything they read. Most people really do. But this article here says there was a TV piracy war going on for Pay-TV. And it says:)
A secret unit within Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation promoted a wave of high-tech piracy in Australia that damaged Austar, Optus and Foxtel at a time when News was moving to take control of the Australian pay TV industry.
The piracy cost the Australian pay TV companies up to $50 million a year and helped cripple the finances of Austar, which Foxtel is now in the process of acquiring.
A four-year investigation by The Australian Financial Review has revealed a global trail of corporate dirty tricks directed against competitors by a secretive group of former policemen and intelligence officers within News Corp known as Operational Security.
Their actions devastated News’s competitors, and the resulting waves of high-tech piracy assisted News to bid for pay TV businesses at reduced prices – including DirecTV in the US, Telepiu in Italy and Austar. These targets each had other commercial weaknesses quite apart from piracy.
The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission is still deliberating on final details before approving Foxtel’s $1.9 billion takeover bid for Austar, which will cement Foxtel’s position as the dominant pay TV provider in Australia.
News Corp has categorically denied any involvement in promoting piracy and points to a string of court actions by competitors making similar claims, from which it has emerged victorious. In the only case that went to court, in 2008, the plaintiff EchoStar was ordered to pay nearly $19 million in legal costs.
AFR Editor-in-chief Michael Stutchbury said: “The AFR fully stands by Neil Chenoweth’s extraordinary report of pay TV piracy involving News Corp subsidiary NDS”.
(A: It says:)
“Anyone who reads Chenoweth’s extraordinary report will be struck by the complexity and murkiness of the relationships, actions and motives involved in the NDS story. The AFR welcomes any further independent investigation of the serious matters he has brought to light.”
The issue is particularly sensitive because Operational Security,
(A: This Murdoch Team.)
which is headed by Reuven Hasak, a former deputy director of the Israeli domestic secret service, Shin Bet, operates in an area which historically has had close supervision by the Office of the Chairman, Rupert Murdoch.
(A: Well, Rupert Murdoch has got many awards from Israel because of his mother and who his mother is.)
The security group was initially set up in a News Corp subsidiary, News Datacom Systems (later known as NDS), to battle internal fraud and to target piracy against its own pay TV companies. But documents uncovered by the Financial Review reveal that NDS encouraged and facilitated piracy by hackers not only of its competitors but also of companies, such as Foxtel, for whom NDS provided pay TV smart cards. The documents show NDS sabotaged business rivals, fabricated legal actions and obtained telephone records illegally.
(A: And, it gives you quite an insight into this massive empire that Mr. Murdoch was sent out to create, of course. And it says:)
The emails support claims by the BBC Panorama program, aired in the UK on March 26, that News sought to derail OnDigital, a UK pay TV rival to News’s BSkyB, that collapsed with losses of more than £1 billion in 2002, after it was hit by massive piracy, which added to its other commercial woes.
(A: So, it seems that this group of intelligentsia, you might say, and definitely in intelligence services, were hacking other competitors, news etc, and putting them out of business. It goes on to talk about:)
Covert operations in Australia were directed by the head of Operational Security for Asia Pacific, Avigail Gutman. At the time Gutman was based in Taiwan, where her husband Uri Gutman was the Israeli consul, before she was promoted to be a Group Leader based in Jerusalem.
Totally interwoven you see, with Murdoch. So, I’ll put this up tonight for those who want to wade their way through it. It just shows you how, at that level, this is typical intelligence tricks at the top, because, you understand, he who controls your mind, controls you. It’s quite simple, isn’t it? And that’s why they call them media barons, and you have different countries putting out their own ones for their own particular designs. Now that the Pacific Rim region is a big important part of the future strategy for global order, etc, and lots of cash, then there’s just no holds barred at all. Back with more, after this break.
HI folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. And, talking about the power that these media moguls have and their connections into a lot of things that they dishonor by the misinformation that they put out, because they’re heavily involved in business, in countries’ businesses, and sometimes it’s ambiguous as to what country they actually serve, but this article here is from 2011, and it goes on to talk about the various things that Murdoch was up to with his media empire, it says:
Current revelations focus on Murdoch’s News of the World hacking into the Dowler family’s voice messages during the kidnapping of their 12 year old daughter....
(A: And so on. It says:)
A 2010 exposure of Murdoch’s Times of London revealed that it had published forged documents
(A: It did reveal that, with an inquiry. They:)
published forged documents purporting to show that Iran planned to do nuclear experiments for an atomic weapon, and as Collins points out, it was Murdoch’s “drumbeat of misinformation” that helped mislead people into believing that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attack, supporting Bush’s invasion of Iraq, though intelligence was “unsubstantiated, contradicted, or even non-existent,” according to the Senate Intelligence Committee....
(A: And you understand how these guys can drum up support for anything that they want, complete fictions if they want, and they do it. And they work again with people like Tony Blair and things like that, who also got his instructions from other people but not from the people of Britain. Anyway, it says:)
But what has not yet been covered is the media circus Murdoch’s London Times created internationally as it fabricated lies against a respected British doctor, with consequences that could impact the lives of billions of children in the world.
The London Times headlines read:
(A: And that was one of the Murdoch Group.)
‘Callous, unethical and dishonest’: Dr Andrew Wakefield
MMR (A: Measles, mumps, rubella.) scare doctor Andrew Wakefield makes fortune in US
(A: All nonsense.)
Andrew Wakefield & MMR – the investigation – by Brian Deer
London Times: MMR doctor Andrew Wakefield ‘abused his position of trust.’
Andrew Wakefield was a respected British gastroenterologist who began research into digestive problems in autistic children in collaboration with other doctors in the UK, after being called by parents seeking help. His work indicated severe digestive issues and he asked for more investigation of the MMR vaccine.
Brian Deer is the reporter who savaged Dr Wakefield from the pages of the Sunday Times, a paper managed by Rupert Murdoch’s son James Murdoch who is on the board of
(A: Guess who?)
GlaxoSmithKline which makes the MMR (A: Vaccine). Deer researched his case with the help of Medico-Legal Investigations, a private enquiry company whose only source of funding is the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry. Deer was both the journalist writing on Wakefield and the person who brought a case of fitness to practice medicine to the General Medical Council, and then wrote about the proceedings as well.
Parents whose children were treated by Wakefield were denied the right to be heard before a real court on claims against the vaccine manufacturers. The High Court judge who denied them was Sir Nigel Davis,
(A: The High Court judge, right? That’s who got appointed to try this.)
whose brother is an executive board member of Elsevier, publishers of the Lancet
(A: That’s a big medical journal.)
which removed Wakefield’s 1998 paper on the subject, and is (A: also) on the Board of GlaxoSmithKline.
(A: See how everything gets rigged in society. Everything gets rigged. Absolutely everything.)
With the London Times giving Brian Deer free reign to attack Wakefield, media closed in like shark. Coincidentally, the head of Reuters
(A: By the way, the head of Reuters, where you get most of your news from, they set the pace for the world’s news because it’s owned by Rothschild; what they want you to believe is going to be what you’ll believe. So, the head of Reuters:)
serves on the Board of Merck,
(A: As well.)
and Miriam Stoppard who writes at the Daily Mirror newspaper is married to Sir Christopher Hogg, who was Chairman of GlaxoSmithKline in 2004. Dr Kumar, the Chairman of the GMC Fitness to Practice Panel who ruled against Dr Andrew Wakefield, would not answer questions about his shareholdings in GlaxoSmithKline, and said there was no such thing as vaccine damage and that any parents who claimed that their children had suffered such would be treated with scorn and contempt.
Wakefield lost his license to practice and left the UK. What had he done that Murdoch’s machine went into action, creating fictions about him, getting his work pulled from the Lancet, getting him brought before the GMC to ultimately lose his license?
Wakefield suggested that until further studies, the measles vaccine should be given as a separate vaccine rather than in combination as the MMR (measles, Mumps, Rubella). He did not suggest that children not take a measles vaccine, only that there be caution until the MMR was investigated further. This reasonable suggestion was met immediately by the single measles vaccines being taken off the market.
Wakefield’s work with Professor Walker-Smith and Professor Simon Murch had touched a nerve.
(A: And a financial nerve at that.)
The pharmaceutical industry, an industry that makes six times more than any industry on Wall Street is heavily invested in vaccines (in the US, the companies do not have to prove efficacy to get FDA approval)
(A: They don’t have to prove it works at all.)
and is moving on every front to have their product mandated.
Well, anyway, I think in recent months or whatever, Wakefield has got more power back. I don’t know if he was reinstated, but he was right. In subsequent tests that have been done, they have found these synthetic viruses that they put in these shots in the brains, of dead children, post-mortem, and they’ve also found them in the gut, the intestines of them as well. So, you would not believe the real world that you live in. You really wouldn’t. Mind you, all I’ve said here will go out of your head as soon as you watch Oprah, or somebody comes on with a white coat and talks in a nice predetermined way, and rehearsed way, about the next thing that’s coming down the pike in medicine. You’ll just go back into la-la land. And you’re conditioned that way you see, already. So, pretty tough. Now:
International Women’s Day: Women reclaim their stewardship of life, reject GMOs, GMO vaccines
By Sylvia Gonzales and Esther Rhodes
Women and children’s bodies are the very source of the world’s future. Yet women and children’s bodies are at the heart of the corporate assault. That is the reality women face on this year’s International Women’s Day.
During WWII, IG Farben, the pharmaceutical and chemical giant of the day, experimented on women prisoners at Auschwitz, attempting to develop a vaccine that could covertly sterilize people at routine doctors’ appointments.
Is this a women’s issue?
Today, the University of Georgia Research Foundation,
(A: Another foundation.)
the University of Georgia Research Foundation, controlled by pharma, holds a patent entitled “a fertility impairing vaccine.”
(A: It’s the same one as the Germans used.)
The patent refers to polysorbate 80 as the “preferred ingredient.”
Is this a women’s issue?
Polysorbate 80 is in the h1n1 vaccine which people avoided because it was untested. The CDC put pregnant women first in line for that vaccine, a vaccine containing 250 times more mercury than EPA deems safe, a vaccine to allegedly protect against a pandemic. But the CDC invented the pandemic with data which was as much as 98% false. Now it will not publish the real data it holds showing that 1000s of women aborted immediately (A: over a thousand women) after taking the H1N1 vaccine, often far into normal pregnancies. The H1N1 is now hidden inside the flu vaccine.
Henry Kissinger, responsible for the murder of Salvador Allende and the subsequent Chilean coup, for slaughter in Cambodia, a man considered an international war criminal, wants a 50% reduction in world population. He wrote a report to the US government recommending using vaccines to covertly sterilize populations.
(A: Are you still following the thread here?)
Ted Turner had wanted a 95% reduction in world population but generously altered that to only 70%, getting rid of billions by preventing their births.
Women do not need more than to see the pharma patent and know its preferred ingredient is in the flu vaccine and every single one of the mandated vaccines for children, to have certainty that pharma now threatens the fertility of human beings with vaccines. The long series of mandated vaccines for children means they face an entire childhood and adolescence being hit again and again with a sought after sterilizing agent.
And I’ll put this link up tonight for those who want it, because it’s longer. It’s much, much longer. It’s quite long in fact, but you should read all through it, and it’s not for those who believe in la-la land of the television where they’re all happy and everything. This is for people who are really serious, who have broken out already of at least some level of the matrix, and they realize what’s really, really going on. And it’s the same with men too. They’re pretty well sterile before they’re 30. In their early 20s now, they’re finding them sterile. And what they do produce sperm-wise is dysfunctional. It can’t find the target, the sperm itself. Each spermatozoon is malformed. And this should be a medical emergency, but nobody is calling it that. Why are they not calling it that? Because, you see, it was planned that way. You were meant to go infertile, because of what’s been done with you when you were young.
And in Australia, they’re getting the police, of course, to push this one in Australia, but they’re talking about a national DNA database. So, the police want it, you see. And I guess that’s all you need in Australia, maybe. Maybe you just need the police to demand it and they get what they want. I don’t know. I’ll put that link up too.
And another link I’ll put up too, it’s quite a good one actually, because the Smart Meters they’re putting up in Australia have been going on fire, and burning houses down. And there’s actually a video of one going and my God, it’s really going too. It’s really going good guns.
Now, this big push for sustainability, and this is the time, we’re going to see lots, and I said this a few months ago, you’ll see lots and lots of articles come out now, probably one a day, at least one a day, to do with sustainability in one form or another. They come up with different names for it all to confuse you. But it’s a real assault on your mind to get you ready for Rio+20, which is the Earth Summit, of course, for sustainability. That includes depopulation as well, and all that kind of stuff. But it’s also to do with starting with corporations putting on carbon taxes and that kind of thing, or cutting their power and getting fined, to get you used to that. And that will carry on for a couple of years, and once you’re all used to it, then you’ll get personal taxes on what you produce per day. That’s the real intention of it. We’re trained like animals, step by step, you see. And I’ll put an article up, it says:
The Obama administration proposed on Tuesday the first rules to cut carbon dioxide emissions from new U.S. power plants, a move hotly contested by Republicans and industry in an election year.
(A: So, it:)
...would effectively stop the building of most new coal-fired plants in an industry that is moving rapidly to more natural gas. But the rules will not regulate existing power plants, the source of one third of U.S. emissions, and will not apply to any plants that start construction over the next 12 months.
The watering down of the proposal led some ardent environmentalists
(A: It’s almost like it’s a religious group, isn’t it? What’s an environmentalist? Is it like a hobby or something, or a fanaticism? What is it? You know. Are you a flat-earther? I mean, an environmentalist. Like no one else cares about the environment. You see. They’re holier than thou, you understand. They raise themselves up to be holier than thou. They’re the “guardians” of the world. Well, who? Are they self-appointed guardians? I don’t think so. They’re all well-funded groups, nongovernmental organizations paid big bucks by the foundations that run the planet. And they get massive pension plans and everything. These aren’t tin-cup collectors round door to door for a charity. This is how the world is shaped, the army of NGOs.)
to criticize its loopholes, but a power company that has taken steps to cut emissions praised the rules.
Anyway, this is what they’re saying, is that now they’re going to clean up the air and all that kind of stuff. And yadda, yadda, yadda, yah. Just to get you all used to it. Most stuff, you understand, is just a part of the way towards the big, big agenda, and they dish it out in bits and pieces to you.
And this little article is quite funny here too. It’s funny, but probably true, because it says:
“A part of the fortune of the Queen of England comes from drug trafficking.”
(A: And there’s two versions of this one. One was put out on Yahoo, as a counter to it, trying to make it all a fun, happy-happy nonsensical thing and a conspiracy theory. And then there’s this article here. It says, it was by:)
- Jacques Cheminade, candidate for the 2012 French presidential election
Britain’s financial regulator has fined the British queen’s bank for money laundering failures as a French presidential candidate has said part of the queen’s fortune “comes from drug trafficking.”
(A: And it is true the British financial regulator has fined the British queen’s personal bank for money laundering failures, as this presidential candidate is running at the same time mentioning it. He mentioned that a lot of her fortune comes from drug trafficking.)
The Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined the British queen’s bank, Coutts Bank,
(A: She used to be with Baring’s, until that got into some bother with false accounting too, and false shares and things. So:)
Coutts Bank, 8.75 million pounds for failing
(A: That’s what they were fined. Can you imagine the kind of money that goes through it?)
for failing to carry out correct checks on “politically exposed persons” and prevent money laundering.
(A: So, they were doing both you see, like most banks.)
“The failings at Coutts were serious, systemic and were allowed to persist for almost three years. They resulted in an unacceptable risk of Coutts handling the proceeds of crime,” the FSA said in a statement posted on its official website.
The news comes less than a week after a fringe candidate for April’s French presidential election said the British queen owed her fortune to drugs money laundered by “Jewish bankers in The City.”
(A: He actually said. And he says:)
On 21 March, Jacques Cheminade, an independent presidential candidate running in the French election, said, “a part of the fortune of the Queen of England comes from drug trafficking.”
“No, not any property, there are several other sources. But it is a series of trafficking in which, yes, there is trafficking drugs,” Cheminade said on television LCP French National Assembly.
Well, there’s always been trafficking in drugs. If you read George Orwell or Blair, his real name was Blair, he came from a family of bureaucrats that served the Queen, and something like Obama said in his speech lately too. He served the Queen, a faithful loyal servant. Anyway, you find that Orwell’s dad was the chief opium overseer, basically, overseer for the opium crops in Burma at that time. They had them in different countries. And he admits that in his book. But even before he wrote his book, I think it was in 19, maybe 29, I can’t remember. I remember reading it years ago. I think it was an MP called Thompson stood up, about 1929 in Parliament in Britain, because he got wind that the British Opium Company was still going. They thought it was all dismantled in the previous century, but apparently it was still a Crown Corporation, and it was only members of the Royal Family and their cousins who had shares in this massive organization. And nobody knew at that time that the British army were still guarding all these, just like they’re doing today in Afghanistan, our armies are all guarding the poppy fields. Same thing goes on. Anyway, it came out then that, yeah, Britain still had, or the Crown still had their own poppy fields and so on. So, nothing’s really changed. It’s just that we’ve been warped to think that everything is; we’ve been warped. You see, they warp our brains to make us think everything is on the up and up nowadays, isn’t it.
How much do you know about the Queen or her income? Nobody knows really anything about it, even what’s declared, because she’s got holdings all across the whole planet. She doesn’t have to declare it, like Rothschilds and central bankers don’t have to declare it. Back with more, after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back, and we’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And we’ll go to Daniel from the UK, if he’s still hanging on there.
Daniel: Yeah. Hello, Alan. I just wanted to ask you one thing, well, there’s a few things, but just one question. I downloaded this self-defense manual, it was a military self-defense manual, off the internet. I was looking at it. And it’s a bit gruesome. There’s a section here on how to remove a sentry. It’s pretty gruesome stuff. But there’s a reference here to a sixth sense, and if you’d let me read a few lines, maybe you could answer my questions as to what it’s about. Is that all right?
Alan: Yeah. Go ahead.
Daniel: It says: “When approaching a sentry, the soldier synchronizes his steps in movement with the enemy, masking any sounds. He also uses background noises to mask his sounds. He can even follow the sentry through locked doors this way. He is always ready to strike immediately if he is discovered. He focuses his attention on the sentry’s head, since that is where the sentry generates all of his movement intention. However it is important not to stare at the enemy, because he may sense the stalker’s presence through a sixth sense. He focuses on the sentry’s movements with his peripheral vision.”
Now, if I had read this in anything else, I might have dismissed it, but this is an official military manual, and there’s a reference here to a sixth sense. Now, do you know what that is?
Alan: Well, we all have it, basically. It’s to do with each other, that is. You know when someone is staring at you. It’s not so much staring; they’re concentrating on you. It’s the concentration you pick up on. And that’s why they’re told to try and see a target through the peripheral vision, so that you’re just on them, but to the side of them, technically. I know in the military they do teach these techniques, and it’s got to be done very quickly too, very quickly before they pick up on the fact that there’s someone either stalking them, or catching on that there’s someone behind them or wherever. So, there is definitely a sixth sense, we sense it. But there’s other factors that come into it too. It’s surprising, he’s talking about background noise there, it’s surprising how the little sounds that a human being makes, that are almost imperceptible, when you’re in a heightened state of alert you will pick up on them, even your feet on blades of grass, you know, even if you’re walking fairly softly, you’ll pick up so many different things. They also refer to that as the sixth sense. It’s really the hyper-acuity of your hearing, etc, or you might even hear the person breathing, you know.
Daniel: But I mean, with regards to a sixth sense, do you think there is something, like sometimes you think when animals can almost sense when a hunter is trying to kill them, that sort of thing. You know. I don’t know what it is, but there’s something there. I don’t know. There’s something else going on.
Alan: You’ll find it even with cattle, before they’re going to be taken off the next day for slaughter, the cattle will moo all night. They’ll make one heck of a din. And why it happens, I don’t know, but they all seem to sense what’s going on. Maybe it’s the change in behavior of the farmers around them, they’re picking up on something, and it makes them very uneasy. But there is a sixth sense. Unfortunately I think it’s missing today in a lot of people, because we’re trained, you wouldn’t believe on how many levels we are trained not to listen to ourselves, not to listen to our abstract thinking and let it go to where it wants to go. We’re trained into thinking in very narrow corridors. And that’s the intention of control as well of course, is to do away with that ability, to sense something coming up, something to your detriment that you should be aware of. We’re tricked in so many ways. Simply going to a doctor or lining up for the flu shot. You know, your sense says there’s something wrong here. Especially when they can’t tell you if it even works and never mind what’s in it. But the training you get overcomes your common sense or your sixth sense as well. So, you’re quite right. There is a sixth sense. We should use it more. When you suspect something, go with your suspicion. That’s what you should be doing. Thanks for calling. From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
The Beginnings of Killing with Dignity
Battle for Pay TV, Dirty Tricks, Rupert Murdoch and Israeli Secret Service
Murdoch and Newspaper Attacks on Dr. Andrew Wakefield
Patent on Fertility Impairing Vaccine held by Georgia Research Foundation
Australia--NSW Propaganda Push for National DNA Database
Smart Meters in Australia a Hot Item---They Burst into Flames--Video
US Pushes Carbon Limits on Power Plants
Queen Accused of Drug Trafficking