Feb 17th, 2012 (#1025)
Alan Watt "Cutting Through the Matrix" LIVE on RBN:
Poem Copyright Alan Watt Feb 17th, 2012:
Sustainability means No Virility:
"Think More is Going On? Have
The World is Really Run by Private Foundations,
All Working Together to Bring You to Austerity,
Meaning Forced Poverty Mandated with Severity,
With Darwinian Teachings the Fittest will Survive,
Although the Vast Majority Never will Arrive,
There's Trillions of Dollars in "Charitable Institutions",
With Philanthropists Guiding All Social Revolutions,
A Brave New World's Coming to Teach How to Live,
With the God "Jolly Green Giant" saying Give, Give, Give"
© Alan Watt Feb 17th, 2012
Poem & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt – Feb 17th, 2012 (Exempting Music, Literary Quotes, and Callers' Comments)
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through the Matrix on the 17th of February, 2012. For newcomers, go into cuttingthroughthematrix.com and make use of the thousand, over a thousand audios there for free download, where I try and bring the big picture together for you, there’s so many parts to the puzzle, to show you the big system that you’re living through, which is called the New World Order, the New Order of Things, the Great Transition. A whole bunch of names for the same thing. And basically, I go through the histories of the groups that came together to form the main organization that runs the world, over a hundred years ago, and how they eventually changed their names, two or three times, and now it’s called the CFR, Council on Foreign Relations, that are across the whole planet, with members inside every government. All presidents and prime ministers are members of it, and have been for about a hundred years. And their main grandparent basically is the Royal Institute of International Affairs. A world to be run by experts and money boys and not by the peasantry, you see. As simple as that. That’s basically all it is. And a planned society.
The good shepherds only need so many sheep, so, in a post-industrial society, why have so many floundering all over the place with not much to eat. And so, the idea is depopulation, planned society, for a utopian future, for the elite themselves, with the use of science, of course, to bring in better slaves in the future. In the meantime, we have to go through the depressions, the wars, finish off the wars for them across the world, so they have a global system, a global government system. They call it governmental system, or governance, and eventually to bring in their new clones, basically. That’s how it’s going to be. And we see the start of it all over the place. And there are so many different articles across the planet, if you just put them together for yourselves. They don’t believe in keeping unemployed peasantry around. Human nature hasn’t changed. It’s just as wicked as it was in the Middle Ages, for those who rule. That’s their nature. They’re psychopathic.
Now, for those who like this broadcast, you can help me keep going by buying the books and the discs at cuttingthroughthematrix.com. And from the US to Canada, you can still use a personal check to order. You can send cash. You can use an international postal money order from the post office. And PayPal, again, as well. You’ll find out how to do it at cuttingthroughthematrix.com web page. And across the world, Western Union, Money Gram, and PayPal, once again. Remember straight donations are really, really welcome.
And what I do is try, as I say, to really, not just influence people to do something, at least for themselves, because really, all you can be sure of in this life is to try, even then it’s kind of hard, but you’ve got to be sure of yourself, and how you do things for yourself. Never mind other people, or the groups, or their opinions that are all given to them. What will you do? And to teach you to use your own common sense. We shouldn’t have to ask people what to do, you understand. We’re supposed to come up with decisions for ourselves. But we’ve been trained to listen to experts, what we think is experts and authority figures, to do all the thinking for us, and the planning for us, and that’s why we end up in such a mess all the time. Each person has got the potential to be their own person and think for themselves, and that’s what I hope to promote.
So, we’re going through the big changes, as I say, and it’s going to be awfully, awfully hard now. Very tough, because it’s a world decision, to bring us into austerity. Austerity pretty well means simplicity or poverty, for those who don’t understand it, because the First World countries have had their bit of time allocated to them, according to the elite, who have so many think tanks publishing the stuff that you can’t even keep up with them. There’s thousands of think tanks out there, and foundations, all funding this whole New World Order into simplicity. And the Third World Countries now are getting our money given to them, as we go into austerity, and pretty well near bankruptcy, through the old idea of redistribution of wealth from Karl Marx, because the bankers created Karl Marx you see. They run both sides. Back with more, after this.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. And, as I said before, nothing has changed. Nature hasn’t changed. Human nature hasn’t changed for an awful long time. We do have a thin veneer of what we call civilization. And civilization tends to be your indoctrination, and that’s about it. Our indoctrination, of course, is to do also with morality. And morality is plastic, when we don’t have a natural morality left anymore. And once it’s plastic, you can twist it in any direction that you want it to go. And that’s what the elite of course do. That’s what the neuroscientists are all about, and those who control the media, and control the school systems, and control all your entertainment. Your entertainment industry is a big part, a very, very, big part in fact, maybe the most important part of altering morality in all kinds and shapes and ways, and so on. So, everyone has got an agenda, and big power and big money always runs behind it. And sometimes, we sniff on to something. Most folk have got an idea that the world is totally corrupt. But it’s always been corrupt. It’s just that in the past, they put on better shows at the top in politics, and could hide it better. Now there’s so much of it, they can’t even hide it.
I mentioned an article a few weeks ago to do with Lord Mandelson of Britain and Lord Rothschild. Apparently they had a cover story, how they were taking off to Russia. They just went over there to get whipped, apparently, in some kind of sauna situation, by some 25-year-old. That was their excuse for taking along Mr. Mandelson who was the Trade Minister basically for Britain, it might even have been for the European Union, and he could really sinkhole investments or push investments. And of course, Rothschild sued the newspapers that tried to come out with the story. However, Lord Rothschild went to court and he lost. And it says here:
According to the High Court, Nathaniel Rothschild, scion of the banking dynasty and friend of seemingly everyone in the spheres of finance, business and politics, is indeed "puppet master" to the Baron of Hartlepool and Foy.
(Alan: Which is Mr. Mandelson.)
The banker and Bullingdon boy
(A: The Bullingdon Club actually is one of these snobby, snobby clubs, where these rich little characters get absolutely sozzled drunk and smash all the furniture and stuff like that, you know. Anyway.)
has lost his libel case against the Daily Mail, which he sued for "substantial damages" over its account of his and Mr Mandelson's extraordinary trip to Russia in January 2005.
Mr Rothschild claimed he was subjected to "sustained and unjustified" attacks in the May 2010 article, which portrayed him as a "puppet master", dangling his friend Lord Mandelson in front of the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska to ease the passage of colossal business deals.
Messrs Rothschild and Mandelson's Russian trip would certainly have made entertaining viewing, but maybe not for Thunderbirds fans. Nobody needed rescuing, that's for certain.
(A: So, anyway, it says:)
It began on Mr Rothschild's private jet from the World Economic Forum in Davos to Moscow,
(A: That’s where they took it from.)
where they met Mr Deripaska, the aluminium plant manager who became the richest oligarch of them all, and continued on Mr Deripaska's private jet to his chalet in Siberia, where "to beat jet lag" they were whipped with birch leaves before plunging themselves into icy water – a traditional Siberian banya.
Less salacious, but seemingly more sordid, was an earlier dinner at Cantinetta Antinori, a fashionable Tuscan restaurant in Moscow. Mr Deripaska, the Mail had claimed, was dining with executives from the US aluminium giant Alcoa, negotiating a £250m deal to buy two of Mr Deripaska's aluminium plants, at which a stumbling block was an EU import tariff on Russian aluminium. Enter Lord Mandelson, then a lowly Mister, but at the time the EU Trade Commissioner.
(A: That’s not just a lowly position.)
The deal is done, costing several hundred British jobs, and the tariffs come down.
(A: See, how they work it. Utter corruption, folks. Utter, utter corruption, but this is their normal business practice.)
Mr Rothschild claimed the trip was "purely recreational",
(A: You know, to get whipped with a wee boy.)
and Associated Newspapers had to admit during litigation that it couldn't be sure that Mr Mandelson had joined Mr Deripaska at dinner or whether aluminium tariffs were discussed, and in fact the deal had been struck before Mr Mandelson and Mr Rothschild arrived in Moscow. But for Mr Justice Tugenhadt, recreation it was not.
"So far as Lord Mandelson was concerned the benefit was the trip and the hospitality itself. So far as Mr Deripaska was concerned it was a relationship with the EU Trade Commissioner," he said in his ruling.
(A: And that was Mr. Mandelson in other words, the EU Trade Commissioner.)
The judge rejected the notion that Mr Rothschild and Mr Mandelson had flown out as friends, not business associates, and said Mr Rothschild's behaviour had in part been "inappropriate".
(A: That’s what they get at the top. Oh, dear, that’s inappropriate behavior. Ha, ha, ha. You’d be slammed and hanging in chains.)
"That conduct foreseeably brought Lord Mandelson's public office and personal integrity into disrepute," the judge said.
So, it goes on and on and on. I’ll put it up tonight for you to read, for those who care. This is standard, standard kind of thing. It doesn’t matter how many British jobs or anybody else’s jobs get lost for them to make a trade deal with their buddies. It happens all the time. What do you think Free Trade is all about? Hmm? What do you think Free Trade is all about? Australia is getting wiped clean right now. They haven’t had it yet. They’re seeing the effects of it now. And Britain’s had it. Canada’s had it. The US has had it. And we’re all noticing that only select people get to do Free Trade, and it’s the Big Boys, of course. You can’t do it as a wee, wee character yourself.
And this article here too is to do with, it ties in with what was planned again, a hundred-odd years ago. Actually more than a hundred years ago, because, you see, when Marxism came up, and reared its ugly head, of course, financed again by the same bankers, who always run both sides, the Capitalism and Communism, the dialectic process, you see. And through the battling, they end up having, through governments, different kinds of compromises, until they’ve got things on the table to change society. And then they compromise more, and have more arguments, and compromise more, until you end up with all the old destroyed. That was the plan, you see, and they end up in charge. But, of course, nothing has changed more than really sexual morality, through the Sexual Revolution. Remember, we’re dealing here with the true revolutionists. Not the ones who just have battles and stuff, but they have revolutions in society. These are the biggest ones, to change society. Remember too, that Marx wanted the family unit destroyed. So did Freud. Freud, that was one of his biggest things, he wanted the family destroyed. He said it was the problem of all ills for everyone. And it’s been rampant ever since.
They tried to destroy the family in the Roaring 20s. They brought out cocaine at the time. They made booze sexy to have, because it was all booze cans. They were illegal, but that’s what attracted the youngsters, and lots of jazz. They had already done it in Germany and elsewhere, of course, and it worked pretty well, but the fallout was terrible. And the mini-skirt too, of course, but the fallout was terrible, because they didn’t have the pill, you see. So, lots of unwanted pregnancies. Orphanages were becoming swollen with children that they didn’t want. So, they went back to the drawing board and brought the whole thing back again, in the 60s, with the pill this time. And of course, with abortions, etc, etc, more facilities. Now, of course, it’s gone on to the next step and the next step. And for those who have seen or read Brave New World, you’ve got to see it. Remember, that was 1933 that Aldous Huxley wrote the book, or at least published the book. And there’s two movies out there. One’s a bit older, and it’s actually the better of the two, I think, which shows you the whole agenda, which is even getting mentioned about now, with eventually you’ll have, you’ll be born outside in an artificial womb. They’ll literally create new types of humans. Different categories for different kinds of labor. And here’s an article here about how laws don’t matter when the state promotes the agenda, you see. And the state does promote it. It says.
How does the State get away with grooming 13-year-old girls for illegal underage sex?
(A: Now, I mentioned this article last week to do with 13-year-olds getting this implant in their arm, that gives them a month’s protection, maybe three months’ protection, I don’t know with this particular one, but the parents don’t have to be told, you see. So, it says:)
As the age of sexual consent is 16, what are state employees doing fitting contraceptive implants in 13-year-old girls? Aren’t they colluding in a criminal act?
These sinister devices are a clear admission by the Government. It actually expects these children to have unlawful sexual intercourse, and wants to make it easy for them.
How strange, given that the one crime we all disapprove of utterly and completely is paedophilia. Even convicted gangsters, rapists, burglars and muggers look down on the paedophiles in their midst (they have another word for them, as they cannot spell or pronounce the official term).
Those who engage in paedophilia are often also accused of ‘grooming’, preparing their victims for violation and abuse.
(A: And that’s what they do. They’ll pick their target and they’ll groom them at a very early age. And there’s a whole technique to it. They actually had a book out, I believe, I mentioned it a few years ago on the air, where it said how to basically seduce and groom your victim. It says:)
Yet here we have a policy that directly condones and encourages the sexualisation of children, and is at the very least comparable to the ‘grooming’ we are all so shocked by.
What child, equipped with this rather revolting chemical lump or dose, would not grasp that she was expected by the authorities to act accordingly? I would be very interested to know exactly what the victims of this scheme are told, and how they are chosen.
This thing is done by doctors and nurses, supposedly symbols of rectitude and mercy. It often takes place in schools, where our children are meant to be safe from molesters. It is protected by law. It is paid for by your taxes and mine, extracted under the threat of prison.
Perhaps most sinister of all, it is – like all child-molesting – ‘our little secret’. The girls’ parents are not asked their permission beforehand for their daughters to be corrupted by our sick state. Nor are they told afterwards. This is both totalitarian and evil.
The judges are always ready to confirm that this is no longer a Christian country in anything but name, and did so again on Friday – though I do wonder where they think our laws and their powers come from.
But it is much worse than that. We are turning into a sort of Babylon, only with drizzle and sleet. Almost every sexual practice and habit – with the single exception of faithful marriage – is now encouraged by the state.
And of course, that’s all you’ll see on the BBC too, it’s just a zoo now, what they’re showing. All kinds of stuff. Anyway, I’ll get into more of this, when I come back from this break.
Hi folks, I’m back. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. Talking about how the state gives you your morals and the new morals, etc. Remember what they said too, a long time ago, Huxley and others said it too, Wells said it, all the left-wing Fabian Socialists said it too. And left-wing doesn’t mean working man by the way, it means multi-millionaires at the top. And of course, they want the planned society. They all said the same thing, that they would completely alter and get rid of eventually the idea of marriage, and so on, and even destroy natural relations between men and women, ultimately, as well. And this is only part of it too. So, it says here that it’s much worse than that.
We are turning into a sort of Babylon, only with drizzle and sleet.
Almost every sexual practice and habit – with the single exception of faithful marriage – is now encouraged by the state.
(A: They had a series out in Britain too, I heard. I’ve never seen it. I never watch TV, and it was to do with, it was a homosexual, I don’t know if it was a comedy or what, but anyway, they were really pushing that too. And in one of the series, they had a guy having sex supposedly with another 15-year-old boy. And this is all from the top. This is encouraged from the top down, you see, to give the new society. It says:)
First, the state poisons young minds with so-called sex-education, which is now unleashed in primary schools. Then, when the poor things act on what they have been told, doctors push chemical anti-baby capsules under their skin. I believe this sort of thing is known as ‘harm reduction’.
It all depends what you mean by harm. Having privatised the telephones, electricity and the railways, we have nationalised paedophilia.
So there you go. That’s really what they’re doing. It’s always the same agenda, and it’s a very, very old agenda, and it’s working awfully well. And what you’ve got now too is a whole outbreak of these things happening in schools.
Elementary school teacher, 39, jailed for forty years for her affair with boy of 14
(A: There’s lots of these ones now, with the women having sex with young boys. And it says:)
Shannon Alicia Schmieder was 38 when she was arrested for having an affair with a boy of 14. She has been sentenced to 40 years
An elementary school teacher has been jailed for 40 years for having sex with a 14-year-old student.
Shannon Alicia Schmieder, 39, was told she will have to serve 20 years - by far the toughest sentence ever handed out by a U.S. court to an educator accused of underage sex.
Legal experts said the jail term was the same for manslaughter and other serious crimes.
The 39-year-old knew the boy since he was born and was at one stage like a mother-figure to him,
(A: That’s how they groom them. Males will do the same thing, often in the same family, or a relative, or even a neighbor, and they’ll groom them for years.)
His mother said: 'She was a close family friend. We had gone to the same church together for 10 years. Our children were friends. Our families were friends. We did everything together. It's impossible to describe how we felt to find out this was going on.'
(A: That’s standard. They get right into the family, and they go everywhere together, whether it’s male or female.)
The victim's parents noticed a change in the relationship between their then 13-year-old son and Schmieder, saying she was acting more like a friend than a parental figure.
And then, of course, they looked into the boy’s Facebook, believe it or not and then they realized something was wrong. Now, there’s a lot of this coming out in the news today, because I think they’re going to change the laws and allow it. That’s why I think all these articles are coming out now. And there’s a whole bunch of ones in the States I haven’t mentioned tonight. In fact, the article was almost promoting it. And judges in the States are saying, well, there’s no real victim here, and letting them go or giving them suspended sentence or probation, something like that. And it’s all women that are doing this. So, I think they’re going to change the laws, and that’s the reason these articles are actually coming out now, because we’re so screwed up as a society and they totally want to destroy all that was to bring in all that wasn’t, that will be. And that’s how they do it, you see.
There’s also this article here, and it’s:
Anger at Poole School’s “Suicide Lessons”
(A: For children. See, you’ve got to understand too, I’ve mentioned the articles, when you tie them all together, you see, you must be able to get above all them all, and look down, and start tying things together. We’re a global society. We have the same foundations pushing the same social agendas across the planet. All kinds of social agendas, but all the same ones, everywhere.
Holland for instance now, they’ve got their suicide vans coming around. And it’s really death vans, because if your GP won’t kill you and thinks you’ve got some, maybe a few years to even live yet, the state is deciding through ethical panels, which is basically eugenics panels, and they will weigh up your value to society or the cost to the system to keep going, and then they’ll just decide to kill you. And so, if the GP won’t do it, they send the van around, and bump, that’s it, gone. You’re gone. And that’s to be copied across the world. And I’ve always said that. You cannot put this kind of serious problem into the hands of the state. The state has been after this power for an awful long time. Anyway, here’s the state again, at this school, in England.)
An outraged mum has vowed to take her daughter out of ‘lessons in suicide’ at Poole High School.
Jennene Garnett says teaching teens about such sensitive issues is inappropriate and that daughter Jasmine Bird, 15, came home distressed when she found out about their next religious studies topic.
The 38-year-old mum-of-two’s fears grew when other parents said their youngsters were shown different ways to commit suicide.
The school’s deputy head, Fan Heafield, however, said the topics formed part of the Year 11 syllabus and was approached with sensitivity.
(A: Well, that’s all right then, eh?)
And any student concerned by the issue would be excused from completing these lessons.
(A: They always start it with you can get excused from it, and then make it mandatory.)
Ms Garnett, a care assistant from Danecourt Road, called the lessons “horrifying” and said: “I know of four people that have committed suicide.
“It’s so widespread, the statistics are shocking and a large amount of children kill themselves as well.
“I read that every 82 minutes someone takes their own life, so a good third of those pupils will have probably been affected by it.”
Back with more on this topic, after this break.
Hi folks, I’m back, Cutting Through the Matrix. You have to go in again, to Brave New World. Because, in Brave New World, part of the scenario was that these children in Brave New World had all been artificially put together basically in test tubes and been born exogenesis, outside the womb, and of course, all their genes were put in for them to make them class Alpha, Beta, and so on. And they were actually brought round the death hospital wards to see them all dying. And they were given balloons and ice cream and taught that death was happy and normal and stuff like that, and that they should celebrate it. Celebrating death, you see. This is all part of it. And Aldous Huxley didn’t make this stuff up. He was at world meetings long before 1933 on this very topic. This whole society that we’re living through now was decided all that time ago by people who are dead now, but they’ve got people taken over of course for them, and the foundations working towards this global society of hell. And it says, anyway...
“Any student who is concerned by the issues will receive support from their house officer and will be excused from completing these lessons of the unit.”
“However as these elements form part of the examination at the end of Year 11
(A: There’s your doublespeak.)
we have a responsibility to our students to ensure the full syllabus is covered.”
(A: Why not drop it from the syllabus? Why is this so important? Hmm?)
Pupils also watch part of the 15-rated film A Short Stay in Switzerland, which follows a woman seeking to end her life at a Swiss clinic.
And you understand, children are very, very unsure of themselves, especially growing up in a society that seems chaotic, which it is terribly chaotic now. And very few of them have double parents, man and woman. And if they have, it’s generally not their natural father or whatever. So many of them are in single parent families. They’re brought up with television, school, of course, and they also get all their information from the internet. And they don’t know who they are, where they’re going in life, is there a life for them, because the economy stinks, of course. It’s purposely made to stink. Interesting, they’re bringing it all at the same time, when we’re in a depression, a Great Depression, that’s going to be here forever. There’s no coincidence, when you really, really tie it up.
Remember in Holland, as I say, where they’re bringing round these death vans, they’re going for the mentally ill too. And people who are at any age, teenagers too, who just say I’m depressed, I don’t want to live. Lots of young children will think that at one period in their time, but you don’t help them to kill themselves. They pass over it. They get through it. So, you can see where all this is supposed to go and meant to go.
And on the other end of the spectrum too, you’re seeing the fallout of the degeneration of society that was foisted upon the people since about the 1960s, actually before that, but really pushed up when the sexual revolution came. And everyone is pretty well sick now. They don’t know what normalcy is anymore. Normalcy is whatever is dictated by the state at the time.
Furious mothers lash out over ‘sordid’ male strip show organised to raise money for a PRIMARY SCHOOL
Shocked mothers today slammed a primary school after it organised a 'sordid' performance by oiled up male strippers for a fundraising event.
(A: They probably copied it from that awful movie I think they put out. I never saw that either, except all the promos they had all over the place.)
More than 100 women watched performances by 'All the Way Jay' and 'Tommy Love' from the dance group Dream Men, to benefit Clavering Primary School in Essex, earlier this month.
(A: So, there’s no lack of women going to attend it, you understand. And all with children, eh?)
Two mothers said they would be pulling their children out of the school after expressing disgust over the 'vile' ladies’ night organised to raise funds.
The 32-year-old former bar manager said: 'I could not believe they used a male stripper night to raise money for a primary school.
(A: That’s children five to twelve.)
The parents who organised it are sordid disgusting people.
(A: Well, you’re right. They’re degenerate.)
'We try to teach our children about healthy eating but what about morals? I don’t want my children using computers funded by such a disgusting event.
(A: What about the people who went to see it? The woman who organized it, her husband at least, and it’s really odd for a place like Britain, who have been henpecked forever, especially from television, every guy is an idiot in the comedies, the husband stopped her from going to see it. He put his foot down. So, good for him. And it says:)
And in another performance All the Way Jay covered his body in glow-in-the-dark paint before gyrating to the baying crowd.
And apparently shoved his genitals in a woman’s face. Well, that’s a good way to get herpes. I hope you enjoyed your night. Anyway, that’s the degeneration of society that’s pushed through television and through their daily serials that they watch and everything else, and it’s supposed to be the new normal, you see. And we’re so liberated now, and we’re so mature, we can handle this stuff, can’t we? Yeah, we can really handle it, can’t we? Yeah. Yeah. Disgusting.
Now, I’ve mentioned too, over the last few days, about the big, big foundations, and one of them that was in with everybody else, of course with the Carnegie Foundation, Rockefeller Foundation, and all the rest of them, was the Hewlett Foundation. I’ll put a link up tonight to Global Development and Population Program. Their program is about depopulation, for those who don’t quite get it yet. And they have abortion clinics all over the planet, and their function is to go into the more poor areas and get rid of unwanted children that might come up in the future, from the Hewlett Foundation. They’ve got such money going through them you wouldn’t believe it. It’s scary how much cash goes through these foundations. Trillions of dollars actually go through them all. And that’s what really runs the world. The big foundations were to run the world, according to the Royal Institute of International Affairs, while the people below would believe they were given a form of democracy. We’ve had that for a hundred years now, these foundations. Every agenda you could imagine, social agenda, has been accomplished through the foundations, and their armies and armies and armies of nongovernmental organizations. We don’t elect any of them in. They’re not responsible to answering to us, because government will not put any laws through to stop them, because they have their own members in government. There’s only one agenda.
Now, here’s an article from about a year or two ago. It’s called the American Dream. And you’ve got to understand that every group of shows that you listen to is managed by somebody. It says:
Wouldn't it be great if a Republican presidential candidate could just buy the support of just about every major conservative talk show host in America?
(A: Now, you can convert that to, or invert that to, the liberals. It doesn’t make any difference. It says:)
Well, it may not be as far-fetched as you may think. Clear Channel owns more radio stations (850) than anyone else in the United States. They also own Premiere Radio Networks, the company that syndicates the radio shows of Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, and Glenn Beck, among others. Needless to say, Clear Channel basically owns conservative talk radio in the United States.
(A: And of course, they might even own it in the liberal as well.)
So who owns Clear Channel? Well, it turns out that Bain Capital is one of the primary owners of Clear Channel. Yes, you read that correctly.
The company that Mitt Romney ran for so long is one of the "big bosses" over virtually all conservative talk radio in America. Of course Mitt Romney is not running Bain Capital anymore. He is a "retired partner", but he still has a huge financial stake in Bain Capital. We're talking about millions upon millions of dollars. If you doubt this, just check out page 34 of this public financial disclosure report.
(A: The link is here, and I’ll put it up tonight.)
So if you have been wondering why so many conservative talk show hosts are being so incredibly kind to Mitt Romney, this just might be the answer.
In the media world, there is a clear understanding that you simply do not bite the hand that feeds you. Some of the most prominent conservative talk radio hosts are earning tens of millions of dollars a year.
If you were making tens of millions of dollars a year, wouldn't you be very careful to avoid offending your boss?
The deal in which Bain Capital became one of the owners of Clear Channel was initiated just a short time before Mitt Romney's first run for president. The following comes from Wikipedia....
On November 16, 2006, Clear Channel announced plans to go private, being bought out by two private-equity firms, Thomas H. Lee Partners and Bain Capital Partners for $18.7 billion, which is just under a 10 percent premium above its closing price of $35.36 a share on November 16 (the deal values Clear Channel at $37.60 per share).
The deal was finalized in 2008. Today, Bain Capital is still one of the primary owners of Clear Channel.
One of the subsidiaries of Clear Channel is Premiere Radio Networks.
Premiere Radio Networks distributes a whole host of conservative talk radio shows. Everyone in the conservative world knows names such as Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and Glenn Beck. Clear Channel also controls some other conservative talk radio hosts (such as Michael Savage and Mark Levin) that are not part of the Premiere Radio family.
The power that Premiere Radio Networks has is absolutely staggering. The following is directly from the official Clear Channel website....
Premiere Radio Networks Inc., a subsidiary of Clear Channel Communications, syndicates 90 radio programs and services to more than 5,000 radio affiliations and reaches over 190 million listeners weekly. Premiere Radio is the number one radio network in the country and features the following personalities: Rush Limbaugh, Jim Rome, Casey Kasem, Ryan Seacrest, Glenn Beck, Bob (Kevoian) & Tom (Griswold), Delilah, Steve Harvey, Blair Garner, George Noory, John Boy and Billy, Big Tigger, Dr. Dean Edell, Bob Costas, Sean Hannity and others. Premiere is based in Sherman Oaks, California, with 13 offices nationwide.
So do you think that any of those hosts is going to risk viciously attacking Mitt Romney and Bain Capital during this election season?
(A: And it goes on with more and more and more stuff. It’s quite a long article, actually. It says:)
Just check out the following list of the biggest donors to the Romney campaign. These numbers come from opensecrets.org....
(A: It’s got how much they gave.)
Credit Suisse Group; Morgan Stanley; HIG Capital; Barclays; Kirkland & Ellis; Bank of America; PriceWaterhouseCoopers; EMC Corp; JPMorgan; The Villages; Vivint Inc; Marriott International; Sullivan & Cromwell; Bain Capital; UBS AG; Wells Fargo; Blackstone Group; Citigroup Inc
And on and on and on and on it goes. It’s a long one anyway. So, one way or another, we’re all being managed, you know. And that’s why I say, you can listen to everything but be careful, because you’ve got to find out the groups they belong to and who’s playing with your head, because that’s where we get our ideas from.
Also these organizations too, it says in this article here, they’re famous for, and it’s come up before, for having paid, there’s actually companies where they get paid actors to phone in as though they’re listeners, to give you a good boost and so on. And they say that they’ll never use the same actors every day. You’ll use them maybe once every two weeks, so as the people don’t catch on. Everything is presentation, and most of us out there don’t realize it. I do, of course, but that’s how it’s done. That’s really how it’s done, folks.
Jumping from there to the Tides Foundation. I mentioned this before, in 2010, because it ties in with what’s happening in Canada today, where big foundations are into interfering with Canada’s energy situation. The guys that want all the trees to stand, and leave everything as it is, and then get rid of the people, and I’m not kidding, are stopping commerce, big time. And it says:
The Tides Foundation
If you secretly “thought” we were all just part of a big game, then you might be surprised by this article. It would appear that the game is larger than most people thought. Are you “OK” with that? Do you find social manipulation on this scale to be good for you and your family?
In late October, a group of environmental and social justice activists met at a remote lodge on Cortes Island, 150 kilometers north of Vancouver, up the Georgia Strait. The four-day gathering was billed as the Social Change Institute
(A: Now, I mentioned change the other day. Social change. Change experts for teachers and so on, for changing society.)
— an event that says it “gathers seasoned and emerging leaders with thinkers and trainers from the change-making world” — and it’s been happening for years. The lodge is called the Hollyhock Centre, a New Age retreat known for its holistic healing circles,
(A: So, it’s not all what you think it is. It says:)
— Shaman drum making workshops and Tantric “sacred sexuality” seminars.
(A: On the outside. That’s a bit of a cover. It says:)
Stop before you conjure up images of hippies dreaming of a utopian free love world. The Social Change Institute is a magnet for professionals. Professional activists. Professional environmentalists.
(A: These are full time. They’re employed by the big foundations.)
And, yes, professional business people and politicians. One does not sign up for the SCI; one applies and is accepted– or not. The 12-hectare centre, which started life in the early 1980s precisely as something resembling a hippie caricature, has been transformed into the virtual headquarters of a powerfully sophisticated and co-ordinated network of people who are mobilizing millions of dollars “towards systemic social change focused in one region,” as Hollyhock president Joel Solomon has described his mission.
On his side are wealthy trust-fund progenies, powerful U.S. business leaders, billion dollar American foundations, a web of environmental groups and prominent Vancouver political players. The region under focus for “systemic” change is Western Canada. The funding is frequently foreign. And Canadians may not know it yet, but the program is already well underway.
In a promotional video, praising the institute’s work, one attendee notes, “I think we’re starting to see ourselves as parts of a whole, rather than as separate pieces.” And that co-ordination, co-operation and collective power is precisely the point of the Social Change Institute. And not just the institute: It’s the point of all the efforts Mr. Solomon has brilliantly co-ordinated into a breathtakingly enterprising strategy.
Mr. Solomon is the vice chair of Tides Canada, and a director and former chairman of Tides’ American board. And he is a major reason Tides has been pumping money into environmental and social activist groups that have been fighting fish farms in British Columbia, the oilsands in Alberta, logging in the Boreal forest, and dozens of other anti-industrial campaigns.
(A: They want to bring us down to, not themselves, mind you, but everybody else down to this austerity thing, where you’re wearing grass skirts, like I mentioned last night and you know, thorn shoes.)
Most any prominent green group you might think of has probably been on Tides’ list of recipients. Tides also provides charitable assistance to The Tyee, its website shows, an NDP-friendly online magazine. Tides has hired government lobbyists. Former officials and affiliates of Tides, meanwhile, have influence at the highest level of Vancouver’s city government, including its eco-chic mayor Gregor Robertson, who has made it his explicit goal to turn Vancouver into the “greenest city in the world.” Some of the biggest donors to his campaign, and that of his Vision Vancouver party, are also connected to Tides.
“The Tides Foundation has some very long, strong tentacles into all sorts of businesses that all support Vision Vancouver,
(A: This Vision part is also part of Agenda 21. Whenever you see Vision there, you’ll see it’s tied in with the United Nations.)
not as a political party, but as a movement, and this is extremely troubling,” says Alex Tsakumis, a former political analyst for the newspaper 24 Hours and former director of Vancouver’s municipal Non-Partisan Association opposition party, who blogs on political affairs. “And [Joel] Solomon is the green father, if you will, behind this social engineering movement.”
(A: Then you have to go down further to find out more about Mr. Solomon. And on the way too, you’ll find out all the kind of characters. They’re like a laundering organization, like all these foundations are. Sometimes $700 million, you know, is given away. That kind of stuff. It says:)
...much of the more than US$700 million Tides has given away in the U.S. and Canada since 2000 has come from esteemed American foundations such as the Pew Charitable Trusts, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, and others, controlling billions of dollars between them — and the recipients who eventually got the cash.
(A: They’re into:)
...Ducks Unlimited, to more hard-core anti-industry groups like Corporate Ethics International, an organization that this year launched the “ReThink Alberta” boycott against the province’s tourism industry to protest the oilsands.
They don’t want any of us walking anywhere either, in forests, etc. Wait till you hear the history of Mr. Solomon and who he married. Back with more after this break.
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt. We’re Cutting Through the Matrix. Just finishing off with Solomon before I go to a caller. They say he just sort of wandered up the West Coast. It doesn’t tell you where he came from, of course. He’s been well trained, groomed, and all the rest of it, obviously. But then he just fell in love in coastal B.C....
...where, in 1993, he connected with Carol Newell, heiress to the U.S. Rubbermaid fortune, now living in British Columbia, with her own tens of millions of dollars and West Coast way of thinking.
Then they go into all the different things that they fund too, including reusable menstrual pads, I guess that’s for the austerity period we’re going through. You know, share them around. No kidding. This is all in this article from News Talk Canada. So, anyway, I’ll put that up tonight. And there’s Steve on the line. Is Steve there?
Steve: Alan, this is Steve.
Alan: Go ahead.
Steve: Yeah, me and some people, we’ve been trying to figure out, okay, it’s obvious the system doesn’t want us to have children.
Alan: Absolutely. Margaret Sanger said that children are weeds.
Steve: Yeah, I know. I know. But what me and some people were trying to figure out, is this a form of welfare? What’s going on? Because, what people do, is they’ll have, say, a minimum wage job all year long, and then, just because they have kids they get thousands and thousands and thousands of dollars just thrown at them when they file. And we’re like, what’s the point behind that?
Alan: The point is, the point was always to create a massive welfare state. You need to bring in a welfare state when you were separating the men from the women, so the women could have children on their own. That was the first stage of it. And so they didn’t need men anymore. “Oh, yeah, okay, we can have as many children as we want.” And now they’re taking that away from them now, you understand. So, it was the first part to get women saying, “okay, I can leave and have children, and go out, and have as many fathers as I want.” Lots of them did that for a long time. So that effectively over a generation destroyed marriage, to be honest with you. That was one of the big things behind it. And they also paid for their baby-sitting. They would pay for a lot of them to go to college and things like that, but they’re taking that away from them now. And then they’re saying, “oh, look at the mess we’ve got.” You see. “Oh, look at the mess. It’s costing us a fortune,” and yadda, yadda, yah. But now the state moves in and takes care of the situation through all the social work departments. Remember what Lenin said, he says, all these voluntary agencies and services, he called them, will spring up in the West. That’s your healthcare system. That’s your children’s aid. They start off as services. He says, they eventually will become authorities over the children, because the idea is that the state was to give the children all of their new moralities, not parents anymore. So, this worked in three stages and it’s been very successful, so they don’t have to keep the massive welfare state up anymore. They’ll just point to it and say, “oh, my goodness, look at the mess of humanity. We need more government agencies, to take care of the fallout. And children can’t be left with a parent anymore with their sicknesses, all these sicknesses they’ve got now. They’re dysfunctional. They’re all on pills from the doctor or from the street, one of the two. So, we’ll have to take care of it all.” That’s the agenda. And it was written about over a hundred years ago, step-by-step how to do it. That’s why it’s been done, very effectively too.
Steve: Okay. I’ll talk to you soon, Alan. I hear the music coming in.
Alan: Yeah. Thanks for calling. A very effective war. Very, very effective and it’s still going on though. We’ve got more stages to go, into transhumanism and all kinds of things. From Hamish and myself, from Ontario, Canada, it’s good night, and may your god or your gods go with you.
show covered in following links:
Rothschild Loses Case--Reveals Interweaving of Big Money and Politics
State Grooming 13yr-olds for Illegal Underage Sex
Female Teachers Grooming Boys for Sex
Poole's Suicide Lessons for Children--Eugenics/Depopulation
Poole School Suicide Lessons
Male Strip Show for Ladies' Night Raises Money for Primary School
Hewlett Foundation Global Development and Population Program
Conservative Radio using Same Tactics as Liberal Radio
So Social Trends Just Happen, do They?---Example of a Foundation's Mission and the Financial Backing from Other Foundations