Dec. 1, 2019 (#1749)
"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan
Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)
Technocratic Social Control:
"Conspiracy Theories Mocked, Experts
Deriding,
Though
Multiple Coincidences Keep Coinciding."
© Alan Watt Dec. 1, 2019
*Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt -
Dec. 1, 2019 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS: CTTM
P.O. Box 815
Keene, TX
76059 USA
EMAIL: alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com
(Because of
bombardment of Trojans and Downloader Viruses and Spyware, will be deleting ALL
mail containing attachments.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF
ALAN WATT
cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
cuttingthroughthematrix.net,
cuttingthroughthematrix.us,
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca
MIRROR SITE
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
INTERNATIONAL AND
MULTILINGUAL SITE
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting
Through The Matrix on December 1, 2019. After
doing a lot of shoveling all week for snow of course, and ice, a lot of ice, I
forgot even today, I was out doing the same thing today, just hacking away at
the ice and shoveling the snow. And it
was just like it had never stopped in fact, because I was still shoveling snow
this year, it was this year, in April into May, I mean, pretty
well that’s what was going on.
Incredible snow all through the end of last year. Actually,
for the last September last year it snowed right through until basically
[Alan chuckles.] May. Tremendous snow, it was very high. Every day it seems to be more and more snow.Well this… Here you go, it’s
like you never stop shoveling snow now. In the same year I’m still shoveling
snow again after very few months of warmer weather. And it’s getting worse
every year now because of, well, global warming, you know, as we turn into an
ice planet it seems.
But that’s the way it goes in this amazing system
of indoctrination, incessant indoctrination and propaganda that we get our
whole lives now. It’s astonishing really how
repetitive and how much you’re getting downloaded with from all the different
directions. They got stuff in ads and
everything now, little bits and pieces of indoctrination and propaganda. It’s everywhere. Absolutely everywhere.
I’ve talked about it before, how we’re living in
a system that was taken over an awful long time ago, awful long time ago. It’s quite interesting that, I’ve mentioned
years ago too about Technocracy as an example, I’ll touch on that tonight too,
how it really came in in the 1930s as another little branch, and am pretty certain of it, little branch attached to the new
socialistic order of control and management, by technocrats basically. I know that the Rockefeller Foundation
adopted a lot of their planning because they already had it in their agenda
that the world’s resources should be taken over by the right kind of people,
like Rockefellers themselves you know, and the multibillionaires of their day,
and the big institutions that ran the British Empire as an example, on behalf
of the City of London, and all the bankers and all the big wealthy families
there.
So, it’s all one big system. And it never went away. We know, we know that
from people who were the historians for the Council on Foreign Relations,
which was the American branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs,
which came out of the Lord Alfred Milner group, that the right people should
always be in management of all the resources of the planet. Of course, that was
what Cecil Rhodes and others were doing for the British section long before
that, taking over gold, diamonds and minerals and all the things that you
needed for commerce and manufacture would be taken over, and put into fewer and
fewer hands. Until today you have, as
Carol Quigley said, he said, that the
future leaders will be running the world in a feudalistic fashion and these leaders
would be the CEOs of corporations, international corporations. Well,
here you are.
Part of it of course was Technocracy. Technocracy Inc. was a system, part of a system
of many systems which all meshed together in one. It takes
a lot of bricks to build the pyramid basically, a lot of blocks, and that was
one of them. One of the very important
ones. It never went away. It existed before World War II. You’ll find when you go into the history
books for example, and I think there are some good documentaries done years ago
on how the West basically set up communism and funded it. They sent groups of their best engineers over
to Russia. They even built towns for them, which were modeled on American
suburbs with all the same kind of houses next door to each other and so on and
nice wide streets, etc. etc.
You’d be astonished how the US funded all this
stuff, funding communism, your supposed archenemy. Communism, remember, was a system which said
they would overthrow all existing systems and eliminate all, all the older
political type rulers who ruled on behalf of those with the big money at the
top. Well, it’s the folk who have the big money at the top that were funding
communism, folks. Of course they were. And through it of course they could
see their ideal system coming into view.
Now, they also had to bring in a system of
managing all economies. That’s what you
have, the World Bank. We know, again, from the books put out by the Royal
Institute of International Affairs and Carol Quigley a historian for the same
big organization, and CFR the American branch, he talked about how they set up
a World Bank. The World Bank is a private bank, but it’s called the World Bank.
And we all fund it, by the way.
Everything’s public/private.
We’re the cattle, the people at the bottom, the proles fund everything
for big business and the big banks, the big banks, you see, the ones who
do international lending and so on and lend to governments and so on. Private
of course. They also set up the Bank for International Settlements, the same
private organization. They basically
decide what everybody’s currency is worth every day, that day and so on, and
how much money you’ll owe down the road when you go bankrupt, or what land
they’ll take from you and so on. That’s what it’s all about. They have the IMF which comes in, steps in if
you can't pay your loans in different countries. They cut back on your healthcare and social
policies and so on in order to pay back the money they are owed. It's not a charitable
institution. It's very profitable for the few who own it. And it's very
secretive too by the way. Years ago, I did talks on it.
Anyway, for me it's all boring stuff because it's
old stuff and repetition, to me.
Although, there's always folk coming in all the time who've never heard
of this stuff before. It's true. Those who know it have to
remind themselves once in a while that a lot of folk don't know it, who
actually might want to know. Most folk don't care how they're ruled. That's true. That's very true.
But anyway, getting back to Technocracy. This is
the engineers and the scientists who were supposed to run the world in this new
brave system, this world government type system. They wanted to be put in charge of running
the world and its economies and its finances and all of
its industry, and how the people would live. That's what you're into today. And
sustainability and the greening movement and all that, it's all part of it.
Sustainability is to bring you down and down and down into, as I've said years
ago, the United Nations agenda for austerity, you have to
be brought down to poverty. [Alan
chuckles.] That's what they meant by
that.
And what have they done in the meantime? You've
got hordes of youngsters brainwashed in school to act as basically revolutionary
armies to stop us living where we're living, and to reduce the standard of
living drastically, and the elimination of meats and everything else, until you
get starvation kicking in.
Technocracy, remember, has us all down as energy
units. I've mentioned this for years, energy units, we are classed as energy
units. All transactions are classed as
energy, you see. You don't think of that dollar being, but a dollar is
energy, what it can buy, you see. You buy your food and that's energy too. Everything's
energy, energy, energy. And if you're
using too much energy you must perish according to the technocrats at the
top. That's what it's about, folks.
So, the green movement, sustainability, all the
socialistic socialism policies, and even Gorbachev, I mean, the communist
leader, put in charge of a section of this whole thing and the green movement
for America. Folk don't put it all together. And there's no clash between his
policies and the big corporations that manufacture and run the system? And own
everything? And really run everything that we need to exist? You gotta think about it that way. I'll just
touch on that tonight too.
Don't forget too that Technocracy also has,
really, the Trilaterals, again, experts in their fields who are unelected
people appointed into politics and into central banking systems and so on
across the world. And sometimes out of the central banking system and straight
in, like they did in Italy, and Greece too, appointing their Trilateral members
straight in as, to head the countries when they're being bankrupted by the
central banking system of Europe.
The march of the technocrats - ft.com / 19 Feb 2018
It's a vastly different world then, again, we are
trained to believe it is. That's also why terrorism comes into it. I can
remember 25 years ago, at least 25 years ago, when it was fairly quiet in the world for the general population of the
West, they had newspaper articles talking about the world to come, and if
you had a world without warfare, what were the big tech giants involved in the
war industries going to do? He says,
well, the future will have to be a world where they can make their money
selling security equipment and camera surveillance and techniques to monitor
whole cities and countries and nations and continents. Well, when you
read these articles and you read, you see the big wigs who are attending these
global meetings, they plan the future, they always do. But they couldn't do it, they couldn't
bring all this surveillance into the system without the guise of terrorism. That's what they use for it.
For those who can't figure it, you think it's all
accidental that the US primarily and Britain went off to war in Iraq and
Afghanistan, they've got everybody involved in it, you know, the Australian troops
and everything over in Afghanistan, and Canadian ones too. So, they get them
all involved in a war that made no sense to anybody, except those at the top.
Because from the blowback of the wars into Iraq right through to Libya, again,
the PNAC group, the Project for a New American Century, they publish the
countries they wanted to be taken out.
General Wesley Clark on Democracy Now, one of the generals who
was involved in it, he saw the list and he couldn't believe it himself. He
says, why do we have all these countries to take out?
Well, now you know. The blowback, and that's what it's called,
they called it blowback, of these countries that are being attacked, are going
to be brought into, put into the Stone Age basically. All their infrastructure, essential
infrastructure, for producing food, even baby formula in Iraq, it was one of
the first targets they hit by the way, had to be destroyed. Well, the folk started to move out.
Then through the UN, suddenly the countries that
are war with them bring lots and lots of them in. And they're not happy people being bombed out
of their homes and having their… Can you imagine being descended from people
who have been there for maybe hundreds and thousands of years in
some of these places, and losing that heritage and your memory, everything
demolished by nations, who then bring you in?
And you think they're going to be happy campers? Really, come on. Start
thinking about it.
Well, because of it all too, of course you had
problems and of course you've got trouble. We saw another well televised thing,
it seems to be they always seem to pick the London Bridge for some reason, they've
just got so many cameras on it apparently, so I guess that maybe the hope that
they'll be seen on television or something. But that happened again with more
folk getting stabbed, etc. And I think
in Holland too other folk got it too.
London Bridge terror attack: 'the police rolled him over and saw he had a bomb vest' - telegraph.co.uk / 29 Nov 2019
But it's to get everybody terrified. So, your old systems where folk didn't go
around stabbing folk spontaneously, it didn't happen out of the blue, suddenly
happens and you get trained to accept it, just accept it, you're
told. It's astonishing, you're just
told to accept it by politicians. That happened in Britain by the way, just
accept these things. Well, that was
completely unacceptable years ago before they invaded all those countries. It
didn't happen. But now you're told to accept it. And it doesn't matter how many
cameras they've got they never stop it. Because they have no intentions of
stopping it. They've got to have
this happening.
The guy who did it in England a couple of days
ago there in London, it was a convicted terrorist who some years ago with a
gang of his pals had drawn up lists of places they wanted to bomb in London, and
they were caught. I don't know if they were set up with this thing or whatever,
but they were caught. And convicted. And he was put on probation! Until eventually he did what he wanted to do
and that was it. Now they'll go into the
farce of, well it's the probation officer's fault. Come off it! Come off it!
These guys are let go until they eventually do
what had to happen. Then the folk get
terrified and then outcomes the bigwigs, oh we are here to protect you, and
we'll need more surveillance, and you can't have privacy of any kind at all, to
keep you safe. This is Technocracy across the world. Because Technocracy was to bring in a system,
and you couldn't have, you couldn't have democracy. Exactly
the same of course as the Club of Rome who said themselves, democracy is just too slow and cumbersome and
you can't get all the vital things done that you want to do. That's technocrats
talking. It's also the oligarchy at the
top talking, the richest people on the planet.
As I say, most folk are unaware of it all.
What Maurice Strong and all these characters are
doing, bringing in all their different parts of the sustainability movement and
their Agenda 21 project for the whole 21st century, and then the sections of it
up to 2030 and so on, what they were doing, Maurice Strong, they are
technocrats. That's what they are picked to do. We don't vote these people in.
We have no say in the matter. They're just presented to us. Or they present themselves to us, through big
institutions.
So, nothing that you see is what you're trained to
believe it is. Including your country or democracy or anything else. Or those you…
Do you realize the massive machinery behind Whitehall and London? Massive
machinery. Massive bureaucracies and departments of specialists and so on.
Masses of them. They've got huge rooms,
there are actually buildings everywhere where you have
people in a circle just staring at screens and watching everything that's
happening around them in different areas, but they can't stop any of this?
But you want more of it. The big companies that sell all the equipment
are laughing because the money is rolling in. It's great money. You don't have
to ask the customers to keep buying. No, you create terror and the government
hands over the cash. There's no wheeling
and dealing about price, governments just hand it over. It's a great business
to be in for the weapons industries.
And so much of it is international, it's not even
made in Britain. Most of it's not made in Britain actually, all the cameras and
everything. Which always seem to go down when something serious happens,
like the 7/7 bombing for instance. Isn't
it strange, they all go down at the same time when anything big happens? [Alan laughing.] And you believe it's all just coincidence,
'eh?
We're living in a system that had to be, it was
made to be, every problem is not just an accidental blowback from accidental
problems. These are all manufactured and planned and carefully orchestrated, to
change the whole planet and put it under control of the right people who
already financially control it and own it. But there are masses of bureaucrats
and technocrats and scientists, etc. and social engineers and behavioral
insights teams and so on that are put in charge of us who manage us all of us.
D'you realize even, I was thinking too of the THX
1138 movie that was put out back in, oh, was it the 70s maybe. A very old movie. Robert Duval was in it.
They had to work underground to keep all the power going and atomic energy and
so on. They had never seen the surface,
a lot of these workers. When one of them
goes kind of rogue between getting drugged, because you must take drugs and
you're monitored to make sure you take the drugs and so on. And you're psyched out too, you get all these
different tests to see if you're doped but still able to function properly at
their job, etc. But he kind of breaks away from it and stops taking these pills
and starts to think for himself for the first time. He tries to escape. But
he's caught by these Robocop's eventually with big, long sticks like shock
sticks that Taser them. But you see him as he is getting tortured, it seems to
be just plain torture from you watching the movie, as these Robocops torture
him with long sticks, into different positions, in the stomach and wherever
he's getting prodded and so on. It then
pans off back to this big room of screens, again, with white coated scientists
observing everything and observing his reactions. He's literally getting a
thorough physical of all his nervous system and his brain scans, as
this is all happening. Well, we're here
folks. We are here. [Alan chuckles.] And that was written about years ago, do you
think these guys just make up this stuff by themselves? Do you really think that? Hm?
It's all here.
But I was just thinking about that today, in fact
as I say, I was out cutting ice and cleaning snow most of this darn week and I
didn't have much time to really look for anything to even talk about. Which
does often happen, especially in winter.
Sometimes I'll gather stuff to talk about and I’ll just toss it away and
just prattle on with whatever happens to be in my head at the time, which is
more spontaneous and I think that's the way things
should be.
But today as I was hacking away at the snow and everything I thought about this whole sustainability thing
and Technocracy, and again, the scientists being sent off to the Soviet system,
and had purpose built communities so they could build the Soviet, the communist
empire... that supposedly was going to overthrow the whole world structure. Why
would your own governments, and even the British one with their monarchies and
so on, why would they fund and send their top, top scientists over to the
Soviet Union, and their top engineers over there and build homes for them,
streets and streets and towns and communities, why would you build that for
your supposedly, people who are going to overthrow you and slaughter you? Why
would you do that?
There's something here that they don't want to
tell you. [Alan chuckles.] Things are not quite as they seem to be or as
they are presented to you. That's the
whole point I'm trying to make here. And
I really mean that. Things are vastly different, vastly different from the way
you’re trained believe them to be. You’re taught to believe we're stumbling
down through time, on this mud ball here, and accidents just happen, and
experts jump in when accidents happened to deal with the problems. You're trained to believe this.
The future is planned. I've done so many shows for so many years and
have gone through so much history, often from the big players’ books themselves
that they put out, their memoirs and everything, and when you read this stuff
70 years ago or 100 years ago, of their dreams and aspirations for ruling the
world, and in your own lifetime you saw all of it come to pass, well, you're
not reading fiction and you're not reading Santa Claus letters put out by the
bigwigs. This is planned. And they all belong to international massively
wealthy organizations, to make it all happen. It really is astonishing.
Who do you think is funding all the Color Revolutions
across the world? And even the Yellow Vests in France? Hm?
How are all these folks who are protesting for maybe a year or two in
France, where do they get, how are they feeding themselves that they're not
working but they're protesting every day?
Think about it. And now of course they're being awfully good and they're
protesting, I think they said, Amazon to do with this Black Friday sale and all
the rest of it and how they're ruining the environment by their commerce and
their capitalism. So suddenly they've changed and
they've hit...
Black Friday backlash: Protests against Amazon erupt across France - bbc.com / 29 Nov 2019
Of course, they'll be, maybe, I'm sure they'll
all want to get you off meat and everything else too, and then have you on the
GM food that's soaked in pesticides and herbicides and God knows what else, hm. That's what I was thinking about today, all
the stuff that just goes through your head.
At least it goes through my head anyway.
I'll just touch on a few things tonight, just to
put some stuff in that I found. When you look at Technocracy, let's go back to Technocracy
for instance, right. I'll put some links up to, I mean you can download their
old manifesto, Technocracy, again which was their agenda, part of their agenda.
They talk about themselves as a revolutionary movement, a bloodless, they
called it, revolutionary movement that would just take over and take over and
take over. But they would manage all
energy resources including everything you eat, that's all energy. And what you
would do, money would be replaced by credits, like Bertrand Russell said, same
kind of thing, tokens dished out and they would buy so much energy. Because you
need energy to live, like electricity, whatever it happens to be, and you need
food and things like that. That's all energy.
This is what it was all about.
And that's of course is what sustainability is
all about.
But it came out that...
Shock: Elon
Musk’s Grandfather Was Head of Canada’s Technocracy Movement
technocracy.news / 14 June 2018
(Alan: His grandfather, Dr. Joshua Haldeman. I think he was a chiropractor. They were closed down
in Canada by the police in fact, RCMP, because they were classified as
subversive. As I say, it's often hard to distinguish when... that you can smell
things that are connected, like communism, Technocracy, that kind of thing,
everything goes together, socialistic movements where it's all control and
orders, and their democracy. They'll use democracy to get in and then they take
it all away from you, that's what they do. Because is not efficient like the
Club of Rome said, the big think tank, the think tank that was given the job of
finding a reason to take all your rights away, that you might believe, like
sustainability, you're killing the planet, therefore you're an enemy to the
planet, therefore you know, yada, yada ya.
Old stuff, right. But here you
have it, this thing starts with…)
. . . identifies Elon Musk as a Technocrat on the basis of beliefs and actions. What we did not know is that his Canadian grandfather, Joshua Haldeman, was an avid supporter of Technocracy, served as Research Director and ultimately became the head of the Technocracy, Inc. party in Canada.
(A: They had it in different countries and the States
too. I think a University in the States, they gave a department at one point to
Technocracy.)
(A: But anyway, folk never catch on to what it's
all about, what's going on here. Is it just coincidence that Elon Musk's, his
grandfather left of course the country in fact, kind of ran out of in a sense,
and here you have it now, you have Canada and the government of Canada using
our tax money to fund [Alan chuckles.] to fund his projects of changing, again,
energy into electric cars, 'eh. Isn't it
something?)
(A: It's interesting too, that Technocracy,
because it was based on energy, they use a lot of terms from electricity and
science, but electricity for sure. And I
think new converts into it, and it was always, it was almost a cult like thing,
very cult like and secretive. It had greater levels of indoctrination for the
members up to the top. They even had their own salute form, you know, a hand
salute and so on for the public, it was very Nazi-ish
in some ways. And they all wore gray
suits by the way, the gray men, they wore gray suits.)
(A: The technocrats really saw humanity and the
whole planet, really, and all life forms as energy that could be quantified and
measured and even given value. Rather
dangerous, isn't it? And they named
their apprentices or the novices, inductees, the new novices into their system
and they called them farads, after Michael Faraday. And they had other names of
other scientists as you go up the ladder basically. Faraday of course, I think they chose that
because you probably remember him from your science classes and chemistry and
so on and the electrical energy that Faraday really was a pioneer in the
electromagnetism and capacitance. Which
it's still used, it's farads, it's to measure the units of capacitance in
electricity and components and so on.)
(A: It's a bit ironic of course that they chose
Faraday because Faraday himself was, he belonged to the Glasites
basically, it was an offshoot of the Scottish church that spread through
England and went to America too eventually.
But they didn't believe that government should interfere or be involved
in religion or have any power over religion at all. You find that Faraday
himself turned down so many titles from the royal societies and the Royal
Institute, etc. Because he wanted to be
a simple plain guy, he said that himself, didn't want titles. He was such a
famous scientist in his day, influenced all other scientists in that field that
came after him. He would be appalled to
see that inductees into something called Technocracy, who wanted to take over
the world's resources and manage it, as they said, properly, by the proper
people, meaning themselves, he would have been appalled by it because Faraday
himself, he believed in peace. He didn't believe… He was even given offers, big
offers from the British government to create chemical weapons against, for
Britain's war against the Russians in the Crimea, and he refused to have
anything to do with making weaponry for the government's purposes.)
(A: But you think about, hhch, you think about it
too, Elon Musk's car is a Tesla. Hm...
Nikola Tesla. You think this is all
coincidence, folks? You think it's all
coincidence that your governments are all funding people who literally are
never elected to do anything, they're given all this strange leeway to do
whatever they want, that affects all of us?
Isn't it interesting? It
interests me, it's quite fascinating to see it all in action and to realize
there's a much bigger organization running this whole system than you'll ever
imagine and many compartments to it, with different names but all working
together as specialized departments. It's fascinating really, isn't it. It says here…)
One of history’s recurring themes...
This again is from Patrick Wood, awfully good
website he's put up. He worked with Anthony Sutton who put out a lot of
excellent books in fact on the system and a lot of different parts of this big
system that rule over us, and with the technocrats and the Trilaterals of
course, that are appointees, they're just appointed to top positions
everywhere. They were all previously members of the CFR, they are elevated up
to Trilaterals and they have this almost incredible authority, but they've
never been elected by anybody on the planet basically. They're all over the
place. They're in central banking systems. They're appointed to even take over,
as I say, like Greece and Italy when they had a bit of financial chaos, these
guys were just thrown right in there to run the country for them. Nobody was
asked if they minded. That's how it's
done, folks.
Then even, Gro Brundtland who is a part of the elders group, it's called the elders for sustainability, the
whole world's socialist movement basically is really a cover for total
management of the planet by experts, unelected experts. That's what it really
boils down to. You see, efficiency, efficiency for those who just say, you know,
we could run this world so well, but the people wouldn't elect us, so we
just got to do it and get appointed to it until it becomes normal, and once
it's normal then we'll have our new system. Very much like you see in Things
To Come that HG Wells had in his book and the
movie, that kind of thing, where they go off into the future and these top
scientists, then their own children by the way, and grandchildren, had the same
positions running the world as engineers and scientists. Very interesting.
Because it's an old movement, even before they
gave it the name Technocracy it was already there and under different guises.
So anyway, I'll put these articles up.
Then you also have as I say, Patrick Wood did an excellent job, he's
written some books like Technocracy Rising, the Trojan Horse of Global
Transformation, and, Trilaterals over
Washington Volumes I and II.
I think when Jimmy Carter was in that was in that
was the first time anybody in the public had ever heard the term Trilaterals. And he was surrounded by these appointed Trilaterals
in his cabinet, his political cabinet. Since then they've been all over the
place. They’re everywhere actually. Trump is appointing quite a few right now
in fact, Trilaterals in the top positions for those who don't know it. [Alan chuckles.] These are the guys who get
things done, the real movers and shakers. They're not responsible to the public
for anything, or criticism. The
public don't even know they exist, generally. But anyway, I'll put some of these articles
up. And again…
The Last Utopians
canadashistory.ca / 1 Jan 2018
(A: Is a good little article, I'll put that up as
well. It says…)
Grey-suited Technocrats (A: ...and it shows you the pictures.) rally at the Hollywood Bowl in Los Angeles in 1941.
That's just before they got banned basically for
being subversive and so on when folk started to catch on what they were up
to. [Alan chuckles.] It had so much in common with the Soviet
communist system. Because they all
believe, and it's interesting too because Carol Quigley said the same thing. He
says, when he was talking about the conspiracy theorists, you know, and Quigley
wrote Tragedy and Hope, the big book, plus The Anglo-American
Establishment, excellent book to read. He gives you the real version of
history from their own records because they have their own archival records of history
as they make it, in the CFR, and the Trilaterals, actually
because the Trilaterals have all been members and still are I guess
members of the CFR as they go up another degree.
But Quigley talked about it, and he says, yeah these people who are talking about that we're communist
and so on, he says, they're not
completely incorrect, he says,
because our goals, OUR goals he says, right, are very similar to communism. Well, communism was for a
rule by experts, folks, scientific socialism, etc., a complete rule by experts.
And this mess, like the Club of Rome say, of democracy where different parties
oppose each other and things can't get done and blah blah blah, you see.
Last week I mentioned too, we could never ever
have total efficiency. If you've got total efficiency, we're not human anymore.
And you're not free. Not free at all. Whose definition of efficiency will you
be living under? Well, the characters I'm talking about tonight, you see. Exactly.
The characters who will drug you and dope you in many ways you won't
even understand and scientifically engineer society as they've been doing all
along anyway.
But anyway, in The Last Utopians it says
in here that they came out as Technocracy Inc. as I say in the 1930s during the
depression, the financial depression. So, it was a good time to launch it. But
as I say, this organization, most organizations existed before under
different names. Now of course folk,
if they're presented on the television advising some politician or some
government, you think nothing of it. Well, you don't elect these characters,
folks, anymore than you elect all these different characters from the CFR, the
think tanks that run... you don't vote them in so why are they, why are the
governments obeying them rather than obeying the public?
Mind you, the public are seldom asked these days.
They train you out of being involved, don't they? Leave it to the experts,
isn't that what they say? Ha-hum. And it's sad to say but the US still used to,
not too long ago, used to always remind governments that they’re supposed to be
run by the people, not being ruled by government. Hm.
Big difference.
Anyway, this article here, The Last Utopians
as they call it, it's not a bad little story about it. But again, it doesn't go
into the fact that they wanted to do away with borders. Just the same thing,
the coincidence ‘eh. Karl Marx wanted a
united Europe, right, the elimination of borders, and a centralized government
for Europe. They got it. The Royal
Institute of International Affairs under the old group the Alfred Milner group,
wanted a centralized government for Europe. Same thing, you see,
borderless. They set up the United
Nations for the same thing. They wanted
the same thing for the Americas. Well, the technocrats wanted a borderless continent
basically, Canada, Mexico, Central America, into one single nation under a
regime of engineers and technicians.
M-hm. You think it's all
coincidence that all the different names they give to these, all want the same
thing? They all ARE parts of the same thing. [Alan laughing.] There you go.
Anyway, it says in this article that...
Political parties, along with money and all the trappings of the present price-based economic system — which Scott (A: ...one of the guys who was a founder in Canada.) saw as incompatible with the distribution of industry’s output — would be things of the past. The economy would be based on energy (the capacity to perform work) (A: Hm...) and the new currency would be “energy certificates,” (A: exactly the same as Bertrand Russell said.) qualifying every citizen to an equal share of the continent’s wealth. (A: Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha. The utopia. Believe that if you want, right.) People would work four hours per day, four days per week, between the ages of twenty-five and forty-five.
(A: There ya go.
Yep. And again, pigs might fly. But it says…)
As originally conceived, there would be no democracy in the Technate (A: That's what they call it.) — no elections, no parliaments — because, the Technocrats claimed, even in democracies, questions of fundamental importance are never submitted to popular vote. (A: Which is true. That is true. You've been weaned off it carefully as these characters took over to be involved. And you don't even expect to be asked.) Instead, there would be a single disciplined organization under one jurisdiction that would be responsible for the smooth functioning of society.
(A: There you go. Isn't that wonderful. One single party system, 'eh. Isn't it something?)
As John Darvill, the current head of Technocracy in British Columbia has since put it: “You don’t get on a plane and vote as to whom should be the pilot.”
(A: So, in other words, you know, you should use
the same technique with ruling you, your countries, that's what they're getting
at of course. It's quite interesting. It
still exists today, as I say. But it's actually elevated
high above what it even was then, and I would say even into more kind of
socialistic secret societies. And the
ones at the bottom, the old characters, might not even know. But as I say when you look at even the elders
that run in the CFR, and the United Nations, that's what it's called, the
elders, well, you see the same agendas getting pushed by them all, exactly all
the same. They are the same, they are the one, they are one system. And it mentions here too…)
Walter Fryers, now ninety-four, remembers: “We were astonished when the RCMP padlocked our section premises and took records, furniture, everything. No charges were made.”
Other Technocrats were not so lucky. A Regina chiropractor, Dr. J. N. Haldeman, faced trial as a member of an illegal organization. He was acquitted.
But yet he left
the country. I guess that was part of the deal, [Alan chuckles.] I don't know.
Because it was classed as a subversive organization who wanted to take over and
get rid of government and they would be the government, you see. Obviously. So anyway, I'll put these articles up for
those who care to look at it and put things together for themselves.
But you cannot deny that we have no say in
anything. In the so-called democratic
countries you've been weaned out of any idea, in fact most countries you never
get an idea, you've never been asked about anything, what matters. Switzerland
is a different country. Switzerland is far more rights for the public, and the
government cannot do anything on any major scale without asking for a vote
across the country. As it should be, you see.
And in that way the people always hear about who wants to take your
rights away and dominate you, and they vote against it. So, bills and that don't even get passed, but
the public get a vote on the different bills that are put forward. In the
Western societies we don't even have that.
It's inefficient, you see, giving you this idea of democracy, for goodness’
sake.
Margaret Thatcher was honest, I've mentioned this
quite a few times, I remember it quite plainly. I used to be intrigued, because
I've never really trusted any politicians I must admit. I can remember in
Britain when Margaret Thatcher got in, and at that time I was traveling in
different countries in Europe. When she went across to Europe, I would hear her
giving pretty well opposing speeches in other
countries from the ones she was giving in Britain sometimes. She wasn't any
different from any other politician on that score. When she retired and left, then she became a
member of the same, the Trilateral group.
She said, I now belong to a group
which is unelected, and we know all the other members that we worked with and
got to meet, with different presidents and prime ministers and heads of the
different civil service in different countries, and we can make agendas and
get things done without interference from political parties. So, you
understand how it works, this is how it works.
This is how it works.
And the US, remember, is supposed to be a republic,
a constitutional republic, set up so it couldn't be broken or taken over by any
other group. And that's long gone as you well know.
Anyway, I'll put this article up too. But Canada
was a big place for it too. Canada was very big for different communistic policies,
and quite a lot of communists in fact. I
remember too when the first defector from the Soviet Union, the first defector
we know of in the Cold War after World War II happened, he left the Russian
Embassy in Ottawa and he came across, trying to get in from the cold as they
say, he had been hunted by his own people.
It was McKinsey King that was in at the time and McKinsey King panicked
when he was told by the RCMP this guy was trying to get access and get
sanctuary and be taken in. Because at that time after World War II they had all
this propaganda that suddenly, you know, the nastier Soviet system became
awfully, you know, Uncle Joe, he became Uncle Joe Stalin as he was fighting the
Germans. And that propaganda was still so, he didn't want to upset the… didn't
want to upset the Soviet Union.
But luckily the guy got taken in by other people [Alan
chuckles.] and talked about it. He had a whole list of all the high-level
bureaucrats throughout the Canadian government that were communist members who
were actually sending all the data over to Moscow.
Canada was very, very big, never changed by the way, on that. But again, I'm
getting off the topic. I could go into whole talks on the communists that ran
Canada [Alan chuckles.] and their
histories and all the rest of it going back to the 20s and 30s. So anyway, I'll put these ones up on Canada for those who want to, because there's not much
time in an hour, is there?
And this is just a quick search of things too to
get, that came up before I started talking so... I'm sure you can all do your own research and
find a lot of it too. It keeps you… It will make you… If you're really interested
in it to see what it is, it's only one part, it ties completely into
sustainability and the environmental movement and everything else for that
matter. Right down to even who will live and who dies eventually, the right
kind of people.
Because it's a class system, very much so. Although they pretend it's not. Remember,
energy units, and the more you produce the more energy credits you get; you
understand that? The United Nations says
that the definition of a good global
citizen is a good producer and consumer. Well, if you retire and
get sick or you're disabled, you're not a producer anymore. Think about it.
What are they offering you now? And it
started in Holland initially and spread across... Here's a pill, 25 cents, that
will get rid of you, you know. It's
cheaper than keeping you alive, etc. etc. That's your healthcare. That's what
it's come to, folks.
You'd better think about this. I'm not... I'm
quite serious about it. Quite
serious. And if you get taken into
emergency you better be very careful now. Because they'll hit you with the
three wise men, you know, or women, it depends, who will, their job is to suss
you out fast, fast. And if they think
you may have a terminal problem it’d be far easier to convince you, and they
bring in a very suave, good, you know, someone who's really trained in it, very
friendly character, up to you, he'll give you a little talk and get you ready
for the final exit, very quickly. Very cheap.
That's the world we're in.
We’re getting managed like little carbon units,
you see. Because we are, I've mentioned
it for years and years, we are based, we are carbon-based creatures. All life
on the planet is here. It's only in Star Trek you had silicone-based
systems. [Alan chuckles.] But not us. We are carbon. So, carbons got a
price, hm. Energy, 'eh. You are energy. And you consume energy. But
I'll put it up anyway.
Patrick Moore: Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide? - thegwpf.org / 15 Oct 2015
Getting back to the technocrats who are appointed
over us all.
The march of the technocrats - ft.com / 19 Feb 2018
And the proxy Article 50, remember this is the
one they’re using to try and keep Britain in, or Britain could use to get out
if they wanted to, if they could satisfy the European Union. Actually,
the whole thing's a farce. We know darn well they could have got out of
they wanted to when they first won the vote, that was all legal. If the man had
taken a little cabinet with him up to see the Queen and got permission, they
could’ve literally taken over right there.
We all know this. We all know it. It wasn’t meant to happen. Different things are on the go. Obviously.
But the guy who created the Article 50...
Brexit Article 50
creator to be keynote speaker at Insider and Scotland Is Now Top 500 Business
Breakfast
insider.co.uk / 18 Oct 2018
(A: In other words, this guy was at a
business breakfast, etc. Kerr his name
is...)
John Kerr, Baron Kerr of Kinlochard is to be the keynote speaker at the Insider and Scotland Is Now Top 500 Business Breakfast early in the New Year.
Kerr, as a crossbench or independent peer is right at the heart of the parliamentary debate on Brexit as it goes through the machinery of government.
He has said: “I don’t feel guilty about inventing the mechanism. I feel very sad about the UK using it. I didn’t think that the United Kingdom would use it.”
(A: So, he invented that clause 50.)
Former diplomat Kerr has been key to the development of the EU over many years first as British Representative to the EU at the time of John Major's Government.
(A: And he's
also, guess what? … Naturally, a real doer, he is a technocrat and was a
technocrat by being a Trilateralist. He
is a Trilateralist, an appointee. These are the guys who do things. None of
them are elected, folks. They're just put there, and they get it done. And they
all know what the job is, never to be discussed to the public, naturally. But he was…)
He was Permanent Under Secretary to the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in the time of Tony Blair's Government before becoming an independent peer in the House of Lords in 2004.
His business career has been as a director of Shell (A: ...you know, the big petroleum company.) and then chairing the group of directors who brought about the creation of Royal Dutch Shell plc in 2005. He was deputy chairman and senior independent director of the company until 2012.
(A: And guess
what, you know? Remember the big
company, Rio Tinto, that was a Rothschild and Queen Elizabeth of England, the
company, they were the big co-owners of it, he was…)
He was a director of Rio Tinto Zinc from 2003 to 2015.
There's a proper Trilateral member. You see. Remember, taking over the world's
resources like I mentioned before, and so on, so the right folk are in charge of it all.
This is a real mover and shaker. But he's only one of many, 'eh. One of many. But yeah, he's a Trilateral
member. There ya go. Appointed by his
private secretive club, 'eh. But you all
think you live in democracies. Ha! [Alan laughing.] Then an article too out from the United
Nations itself…
Business leaders join UN to rev up sustainable development investments - un.org / 16 Oct 2019
There's the CEOs, right, big corporations, to
join the United Nations, to rev up sustainable development investments. Again,
that's techn... You would call that Technocracy, you
see.
Remember too, as I mentioned before that old
David Rockefeller, you know, many years ago and before he was old, was a big
player in all of this, these movements. He ran the CFR group for the US and had
a big say, he was on the board of it, and he was the chairman of it. Also, he
was up there with the Trilateral Commission. He belonged to the same British
organizations of course, of globalization because the Council on Foreign
Relations is just a part of the British system of the Royal Institute of
International Affairs. Private
organizations. The elite club as they
call it, you know. He said the same thing, that competition is a sin. He didn't believe... And don't forget what
his father had done. They had taken over
the resources of all energy for America. Remember that,
that's what the whole idea was. All energy resources of the era had been
gobbled up by Standard Oil, and the other departments they had for all other
factions of energy. [Alan
chuckles.] This is ongoing, same club
the City of London group were involved in and so on.
So, here's your CEOs as Carol Quigley said, the
new feudal leaders, the feudal leaders are CEOs of big corporations.
Business leaders
join UN to rev up sustainable development investments
un.org / 16 Oct 2019
(A: You'd better understand what you're reading
and hearing when you hear these. Most folk don't because it's not spelled out
to them like I'm doing here.)
The Global Investors for Sustainable Development Alliance (GISD), a UN-supported coalition of 30 business leaders, works to provide decisive leadership in mobilizing resources for sustainable development, with the core objective being to identify incentives for long-term sustainable investments.
(A: And of course, they want a depopulation
program. Of course they do. You take
energy away from people, down goes your hygiene, down goes your food supply,
and your protein and everything, and you start getting sick, hm, you can't heat
yourself, you die off, you die off, you die off. And this is what they say they
must have. It's quite amazing. It really is.)
(A: And who was
the guy who was at the head of this meeting?
António Guterres. You might as
well call him a communist, 'eh, the United Nations, International Socialism. But he told business leaders…)
António Guterres told business leaders. “They are committing to cooperate across borders, across financial sectors and even with their competitors, because it is both ethical and good business sense to invest in sustainable development for all people on a healthy planet.”
Did you vote for any of these folks? No. But it's in-your-face, folks. It truly is
in-your-face. It really is.
Also too, I’d like to put up an article on the
late Patrick Moore who was one of the characters involved in Greenpeace and all
the rest of it. This article is called…
Patrick Moore:
Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
thegwpf.org / 15 Oct 2015
(A: He was talking at the Global Warming Policy Foundation
it's called and he said, should we celebrate carbon
dioxide? And he talks about it. He goes
to some of his history and how Greenpeace started, how he was really against
nuclear weaponry initially, that's how they started, when the whole planet was
being threatened to get blown up. Another big fake thing as far as I'm
concerned. Fear is great for changing
the system and putting all the power that you have personally into the hands of
those who rule over you. Or even creating those who rule over you,
you know. That's what fear is all for.
He says…)
The contention that human emissions are now the dominant influence on climate is simply a hypothesis, rather than a universally accepted scientific theory. It is, therefore, correct, indeed verging on compulsory in the scientific tradition, to be skeptical of those who express certainty that “the science is settled” and “the debate is over”.
But there is certainty beyond any doubt that CO2 (A: carbon dioxide.) is the building block for all life on Earth and that without its presence in the global atmosphere at a sufficient concentration this would be a dead planet. Yet today our children and our publics are taught that CO2 is a toxic pollutant that will destroy life and bring civilization to its knees. Tonight I hope to turn this dangerous human-caused propaganda on its head. Tonight I will demonstrate that human emissions of CO2 have already saved life on our planet from a very untimely end.
(A: If you bring down your CO2, and cut it to
zero, all life on the planet would die.
I hope you understand this, folks. But he goes through how the
environmental movement started off with the right idea, and then moved off into
whole different areas, into the sustainability, on behalf of their masters way above them.
[Alan chuckles.] Of course, they
don't even know they even exist, actually. Yeah, it's
quite amazing. He goes to the history of it. And it's awfully interesting.
Awfully interesting how people start off.)
(A: I think too, I think even Lord Moncton also
was involved with Greenpeace too. He again was disillusioned too when it moved
off into other radical areas, you see, and lost its track of what it's supposed
to be. But any organization that starts off with good intentions will be
quickly taken over by the single world organization that runs everything. Very
quickly. Very, very quickly.)
(A: It's the same with what they used to call the
Patriot Movements at one time in the US where they had lots of good, educated
speakers on their histories and so on and what happened and who is taking over
what, etc. No conspiracies but they had the facts to present. They were quickly
infiltrated. The same in Britain as even the BBC turned out people as experts
in conspiracies, and they grab all the conspiracy stuff and add ridiculous
stuff into it, and then ridicule to it. That's counterintelligence. That's why it works, if you don't understand
that. You must copy all the good stuff that people are saying until the people
who were sticking to the facts, the basic facts get lumped in as conspiracy
theorists or chasing aliens or something, whatever it happens to be.)
(A: He's a PhD and he's a member of these
organizations and he talked at the Global Warming Policy Foundation, right.
There you go. The tells you a lot about
it, what it's really all about, and how they’re
basically getting used etc. etc. M-hm. He says...)
The first principle of ecology is that we are all part of the same ecosystem, as Barbara Ward put it, “One human family on spaceship Earth”, and to preach otherwise teaches that the world would be better off without us.
Well, that's exactly what they're doing. The
world would be better off without us. You've got the... It's so interesting
too, that many years ago in some of the books I read on communism they talked
about how they would unleash basically the atheist and nihilist, the nihilists
on the world. And communism did that too.
Even the French Revolution was a precursor to the
same organization actually, with the big revolution.
They started killing off folk in the rural areas to bring down the population,
control the food supply. They took a lot of the farmers, in the French
Revolution, in the different areas around Paris and different places in France,
and they put them on barges in rivers and sunk them. Of course, the scarcity of food goes up, the
price goes up, etc. etc. Then you bring in their own experts to… And folk again
turned to the government, no matter if it's a revolutionary one, to save them
all, as the same government's destroying you.
What they did, of course they let the prisoners
out of the Bastille, that’s the standard thing to do. Castro did it too in Cuba. When they got in and the US was getting
flooded with all these guys who were hardened criminals, from Cuba. Russia the
same thing, the Bolsheviks let all these murderers and so on out of prisons to
cause mayhem in the streets, etc. And they could recruit them too for their
murderous policies. Always the same agenda, 'eh?
So, what the Club of Rome tells us is that
mankind's the enemy. We are all the enemy, you see. And you've got these radical young armies
being trained by your own taxpayers’ money through the schooling system and
propaganda on their television programs and dramas and movies, that the
people are the enemy, and the system that feeds you is the enemy, food
is bad too, the stuff you're eating is all bad, and you're just wasteful, wasteful, so we'll have to restrict all energy, until
you'll probably freeze to death in the winter perhaps, or, boil over in summer
heat in some of the hotter climates. The
nihilists and the atheists. It's an awfully good term to use because that's
what it is. You see it today.
But anyway, as I say, this one article is awfully,
awfully good and I'll put it up, the late Patrick Moore. Very intelligent guy.
Well educated in his field and who was an advocate of so much of the
policies. [Alan chuckles.] Until he saw it getting taken over and being
completely waylaid for other purposes. Quite
amazing.
I've got many articles I don't have time to go
through on the Trilateral Commission and the different members, who recently
had been appointed even with Trump and different people too. One of them of
course was Kenneth Juster, his name is.
Member of the Trilateral Commission.
It's so interesting too what he was involved with, Mr. Juster. Because they're big players, you know, but
they're kept fairly quiet from the public.
White House Makes It Official: Kenneth Juster Will Be Next US Ambassador To India - swarajyamag.com / 2 Sept 2017
He was a member of the National Security Council.
Now he's been appointed ambassador to India.
Mr. Juster was a Partner and Managing Director, from 2010-2017, at the
global investment firm Warburg Pincus. Warburg
families, very close ties to Nazi Germany in the 1930s, were fully exposed by
the late Anthony Sutton. And since Warburg Pincus had massive investments in
India, Juster presents a huge conflict of interest. Isn't that coincidental,
it's all coincidence, isn't it? [Alan
chuckles.] And so, that's how things
really work, isn't it?
And of course, I got articles too from the United
Nations calling for, oh, basically the ban on all kinds of speech now. To keep
us safe, you understand.
UN plan on Hate Speech - un.org
It's because there's so much coming out in the
public that's got to be squashed very quickly.
Very quickly, because the last thing they want is another generation of
young folk, enough young people who can think for themselves, who can take it
in, what's happened in the past, and see what's happening now, and you might
have about 60 or 70 years to live, they don't want anybody who understands
what's been happening to go on very far from now, actually. People with memories are a problem. And again, awfully, awfully strict now on
squashing your freedom of speech. It's got to be done. It's gotta be done.
And of course, Facebook is one of the big ones
that are using it. Facebook and all these organizations are big, big technocrats, as I say, put out there for the global
structure. These are not self-made people. You really believe this stuff? Do
you really honestly believe it? Hm? Do
you believe the Hollywood version, hm? But
anyway, I'm going to just mention to finish up here, again another article on
the Homeland Security. It says that they’re going to hold the biometric data
on…
Homeland Security
will soon have biometric data on nearly 260 million people
qz.com / 7 Nov 2019
…229 million
citizens in the US by 2022.
That’s a couple of years time. Aren't we free, 'eh? Aren't we really, really free?
Isn't this wonderful, this freedom, isn't it? Isn't it great? As I say, the United Nations is putting
throughout the different, they’re demanding that the hate laws are put in, if
you discuss things, and stop using certain words and all the rest of it. The
complete language police are in power now, you see, they've got to shoot
everybody up.
If you can't converse by using the right
terminology you can't get the point across. Just like Orwell talked about in 1984,
isn't it? Isn’t that what he said? Where
he had, there's a meeting in their canteen, their food place, they're having
their meal. Nothing, even the meat isn't
real. As they say there too, it looks like meat, smells like meat, but
there's no meat in it at all, that's what they said. That's where you're going, folks. 1984.
Published in 1948. By someone who knew what was going to happen. He was up
there. But he also talked about the book at the table in the canteen, a guy
from a different department, the department for basically the dictionary, or words,
you see. He showed him the latest dictionary. He says, the latest dictionary is getting thinner and thinner. He
says, oh, I see brother, I see, so when
it's really this thin, very, very thin, they won't have the words to even
express or communicate revolution. So, you couldn't be a
counterrevolutionary to the system if you couldn't converse. Isn't that
amazing?
Well, here they are taking all the proper
terminology out, that you must used to describe things, take it away because
it's hateful and it's nasty and it's bad, hm.
There ya go. Isn't that just
coincidence? Isn't it, 'eh? It's just
coincidence, don't you know?
And just to finish that, talking about nothing's
really real in the system that we’re born into and that we’re running in today,
because it really isn't, you're not free. You've never been free. You're never
asked about anything that matters. If
they do give you some kind of vote, like Brexit, they won't go through with
it. [Alan laughing.] That's how it's done.
But here's what George Orwell said in 1984,
the book. Run by experts, 'eh, in the
system back then, that's what it's all about.
Every record has been destroyed or falsified. Every book rewritten. Every picture has been repainted. Every statue and street building has been renamed. Every date has been altered. And the process is continuing day by day and minute by minute. History has stopped. Nothing exists except an endless present in which the party is always right.
-George Orwell, 1984.
For myself Alan Watt from Ontario Canada, it's
good night and may your God or your gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following
links:
The march of the
technocrats
ft.com / 19 Feb 2018
Shock: Elon
Musk’s Grandfather Was Head Of Canada’s Technocracy
Movement
technocracy.news / 14 June 2018
The Last Utopians
canadashistory.ca / 1 Jan 2018
Business leaders
join UN to rev up sustainable development investments
un.org / 16 Oct 2019
Brexit Article 50
creator to be keynote speaker at Insider and Scotland Is Now Top 500 Business
Breakfast
insider.co.uk / 18 Oct 2018
Patrick Moore:
Should We Celebrate Carbon Dioxide?
thegwpf.org / 15 Oct 2015
Black Friday
backlash: Protests against Amazon erupt across France
bbc.com / 29 Nov 2019
UN plan on Hate
Speech
un.org
White House Makes
It Official: Kenneth Juster Will Be Next US Ambassador To
India
swarajyamag.com / 2 Sept 2017
London Bridge
terror attack: 'the police rolled him over and saw he had a bomb vest'
telegraph.co.uk / 29 Nov 2019
Homeland Security
will soon have biometric data on nearly 260 million people
qz.com / 7 Nov 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering
Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3
CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and
'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality
Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom,
Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||