Aug. 18, 2019 (#1734)
"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan
Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)
"The Experts Declare The Future is Planned,
Decided,
By
Themselves and Stakeholders, You're not Invited."
© Alan Watt Aug. 18, 2019
*Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt -
Aug. 18, 2019 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS: CTTM
P.O. Box 815
Keene, TX 76059
USA
EMAIL: alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com
(Because of
bombardment of Trojans and Downloader Viruses and Spyware, will be deleting ALL
mail containing attachments.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF
ALAN WATT
cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
cuttingthroughthematrix.net,
cuttingthroughthematrix.us,
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca
MIRROR SITE
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
INTERNATIONAL AND
MULTILINGUAL SITE
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi folks I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting
Through The Matrix on August 18, 2019. Right off the bat I should say I hope [Alan
chuckles.] that you’re all surviving the stormy news we’re all getting, and
coping with it too, and not to get so upset about the bad stuff. Because that’s
what news is today, it’s all the bad stuff we get. And bad stuff is meant to
attract readers of course naturally for news, or watchers on television. It’s all to do with ratings for most of them
and of course selling advertising, etc.
But don’t forget too, we live in a system and
systems are about control generally. Everybody out there that has a system of
business, and big business has a system of control embedded into it. Because
the first thing is to try get something out there that people want, or else you
try to get something else that you want them to want, and actually
want them to actually need.
And that comes down to control eventually.
That’s what the Internet is of course with the
computerized systems. And a few players, really, who are out there making the
systems of Internet, like Windows and the other ones, Apple etc., but there
should be a lot, lot more you would think, wouldn’t you? And it’s deliberate
that there’s not. Because it’s about control.
The world is about control. And you see so much of it today as even the
crazy people out there, everybody’s got a cause. I mean, everybody’s been
weaponized with a cause in a sense. Because causes themselves have been weaponized by the system and those who control the
system.
We’re living through an amazing time as I say,
and if you understand history at all, even fairly recent
history going back to the early 20th century, and even just before
it naturally, you saw these advocates for revolution, all kinds of
revolution, including anarchists too.
Because the system had broken down at the time, across especially Europe
and people were looking for something else. So you had all these different
theories coming out by, and you were given the people to follow, the
philosophers and the advocates to this, that and the other. And people just fell into it, they had their
little niche. And the folk who were
doing the least of all [unintelligible], are the ones who often were used as
cannon fodder for these massive, massive revolutions where millions of
people died. We’ve got to remember that. Revolution is not a pleasant thing at
all. It’s glorified in the movies and things like that, but it’s not a happy
time at all. And I don’t care if you
want to call it revolution or war, it’s the same kind of thing. There’s all
kinds of people get slaughtered in these terrible, terrible movements. It could be a war movement, or revolution,
it’s all the same to me. Because it’s someone wants to dominate everybody else.
That’s what it’s about.
We’re living through a time right now, and I
don’t read… I don’t see television, I don’t watch
television, and what I read from newspapers is severe enough when you think
about the topics that are put out there. But I can imagine how bad it is on
television with so many stations competing for your attention. And they’ve got
have the grabbers out there to try and grab your attention, that’s what they
count on. So it must be pretty, pretty awful to watch
a daily newscast, especially with the world news today and you have all kinds
of news from everywhere, all weird things that are happening across the
planet basically. It can make this world seem a very, very unsafe frightening
place.
Of course at the top, the power mechanisms in
society, and we all live under them, we all live under them, in all countries
we live under a system where power counts on fear basically getting the people
to turn, turn to those in control, government basically, and governance as
well, in order for safety and security. So the more
afraid you are the more you’re apt to just go along with the power structure,
who you hope - it’s a faith-based system, isn’t it - you hope
they’re going to look after you. And that’s what faith is in a system.
I said many times before, and I’m not being
flippant about it, that a true, a true, and it’s up to you whether you
want to follow, naturally, but a true atheistic system of socialism, we’ve seen
it with the Soviet system, that collapsed, and we have a history of that too,
what happened there, and the systems are similar as well. But we see that the state, as HG Wells said, has to basically become God. The state will tolerate no
other, no other gods before it, or rivals you might say. And that goes for any comparative type of
what would be called democracy. In a
social system you won’t have this thing called democracy. You’ve got appointed systems, just like the
Soviet, you’ve got appointed leaders for unions, you’ve got appointed leaders
for all kinds of work and labor, and the division of labor. It’s all done for
you. You don’t have much of a say in it, really.
And here’s the problem today. Folk don’t know
this, they really don’t know it, how fragile this thing called democracy is.
Because now it’s really under attack.
Tremendously so. And I really think that it’s to do with the next part
of the system coming in. I read before articles from universities over many
years, and the big foundations, I’ve read some of them on air, I’ve also read
the Club of Rome books, bits and pieces of them and so on, where they are quite
adamant that democracy has had its day. It’s no good. It can’t fulfill its
purpose in a modern society. It can’t do anything efficiently. And don’t forget
that the whole system, and all the big courses at University validate this,
this is what they’re driving home all the time, that everything will be reduced
to its basic mode for the system itself for efficiency sake.
Efficiency is the key word here. And they will not tolerate… You understand,
the powerbrokers, how furious they become when they can’t just go ahead and do
something, like put a highway through your town or something and move maybe
thousands of you out of the way in the process? Tyrants hate that, that
inability to just go ahead and do it. That’s why they actually
admire totalitarian tyrannies of the past where they just sit at the
top, all the professionals and so-called experts and just go ahead and plan it
and do it. So, this thing called democracy is an awful nuisance to them.
And I go for all sides of that too, I don’t care
what flavor socialism comes in, I really don’t care. It’s all the same kind of
thing, where you’re being told how to live, where to live, what to eat, when to
eat, what to do, what to think. And you can see all the signs of it
today. Which, it should be frightening
people. That part you should be
frightened about, for sure. Because it’s coming down. And you see the
movement towards eliminating free thought. And free thought will encompass a
lot of things you won’t agree with. Absolutely. But when you’re forbidden to even think
about them, you’re in BIG trouble. Big, big trouble.
Because we have the capacities, and the
technologies to introduce techniques into society, that are already in play by
the way and can get a lot worse though, with technological means of computers,
cell phones, electronics, etc. We have all that. And drugs of course as Aldous
Huxley warned about. Which, obviously had been discussed even in his day,
elucidating the public. But also, you
have the techniques of basically [Alan chuckles.] mental strobes, etc, done electronically from a distance. The Pentagon even
released stuff about that quite a few years back, that it could be done with
even Wi-Fi, etc. So, this is not
conspiracy stuff, it’s from official documents which have been released over
time to the public.
It’s comical, as I see it, for me it’s comical to
being at the cutting edge of some of it for years, many years of what’s going
down and what’s happening and what’s planned. And you find the people who think
you’re crazy, perhaps, because again, don’t forget, I’ve even read the
documents from universities who’ve studied, are always studying the population to
tell them how the people will react to someone who’s got proof of something happening but the government says nothing about it. You see,
you’re trained to believe what’s called authority figures. Again, I read
even these documents on the air, which are taught at universities. So, authority figures are the ones who lead
and guide you, even though they can be completely politicized and veering you
off into some state of complacency, where you shouldn’t have complacency, for
political purposes. Or again, tyrannical purposes.
So, you’re supposed to think for yourself.
That’s just it. And a technique for
instance of making you listen to authority figures, and Carol Quigley talked
about this awfully, awfully well in a conversation he had, which is out there
on YouTube land somewhere I think, where he talks to students about this, about
what to say, what not to say. And what he used to do, used to get pulled in as
part of a team for the big television stations when someone else was coming out
and exposing documentation, documented proof that something was going on inside
America, for instance, that the public should know about, since supposedly the
government is supposedly there to supposedly serve the public. [Alan laughing.] A lot of supposing indeed! But people really took that seriously. And
nothing was supposed to be done to change their system without the public’s
consent. At least on paper.
So, Quigley said that he was pulled in, on one of
the many times he was pulled in as an expert, along with the panel who were
also pulled in, to debate someone who came out with a conspiracy theory or
whatever. He admitted in this occasion it happened, this one occasion, he said
they went in with their usual cocky stance, ready for anything, to mock someone
and pooh-pooh them and laugh at them, at this one person, I think it was Gary
Allen and a book called None Dare Call It
Conspiracy. He said, this guy had his information down pat. He knew his stuff. He knew his
history, delved into it. And that shocked them. Because his job, as I say, was
to go in there and laugh them out of existence.
That’s how you’re trained to follow experts, you see.
Another technique they’ll use often today, I’ve
noticed, is when something happens, you’re given a thousand, a thousand
different reasons for it happening, until you just give up. Most folk will just
give up. They don’t have the time or the lifespan to learn all this stuff, so
they just give up and go with the official view of something. That’s very
typical today. They actually did documents and put out
documents a few years back on this technique and how to use it for those in
officialdom.
So, we live in an amazing system of psycho
politics, psycho warfare and psychological techniques used all the time, not
just by advertising but pretty well everything out
there. I had a, I refreshed my memory, again, not too long ago, with another
look at the documentary called Starsuckers. It’s called Starsuckers.
It, really, it’s good for its time, it was 2010 maybe it was put out, around
then. It was up to date with reality television and all that and how everyone’s
reared on television. It shows you so much in a simple way that anybody can
learn, of techniques that are used on you all the time from television and
those who understand the techniques of using television for changing your
opinions or your views or whatever it happens to be.
It was a well-done construct on how people are
dominated by a system. They actually see it as a
superior intellect, the very thing called the television. Whatever comes across
must be, they worship it to an extent. They
worship the folks that are on it. They really worship them. And they encourage
you to worship them. Until now news is mainly about celebrities, what’s called
celebrities. At one time they were just
actors and actresses. But eventually they were raised up to this status, oh,
now, they’re celebrity. They’re rich
people, you see. And everyone wants to
worship them. And they do. And they can tell you all about their affairs
and their divorces and... This is what occupies your mind as you live
your little, short lifespan. [Alan
laughing.] It’s quite good, really,
isn’t it?
But as far as getting real facts and information,
you really won’t get very much at all. Because the television is used and
promoted to keep you away from looking at deeper issues. Because those
who control, across the world, don’t want you to look at all these other
issues. They don’t want you looking into it. You may complain or object about
them. You might. Although again, their
statisticians are always in the way with statistics, and
they have it pretty well down pat of the amount of the population who just go
along with the flow, no matter what happens. Because they trust it. They trust
the system. In a really nice system, a Disneyland system,
we should trust the system. But it isn’t like that. It really isn’t. We’ve got to
be on our guard all the time. Because you have big powers like never before who
really run the world.
If you live in what you still think is a nation
where, what’s the point in electing people to represent you as a people on a
particular part of the planet, wherever it happens to be called, if
international forces are way above them managing it all? Your concept of your
nation has to obviously change, and think, well it isn’t
really a nation, it’s only a part of the planet. And it certainly is.
And this isn‘t conspiracy theory. This is stuff that
the United Nations has been prattling on about since they created it. You live
in a system where they call the people who are participants in the big
movements for the future from the present, constantly working for the
future, they call them ‘stakeholders’. And stakeholders are nongovernmental
organizations that you don’t vote for, which are often funded and put out there
by big foundations, very rich corporations and rich people. All sides, and all flavors. Again, far left
as well, folks.
And these people, you don’t vote for them. Most folk don’t even know these organizations
exist. Because they don’t tout them on the news and tell you all about
them. They could. But they don’t. So, you have to
reevaluate this idea of nationhood. Politicians,
are they there to serve you or not? Or, what are they
serving? Or, who are they serving? You see? And if you get anywhere at all they’ll
probably say, now look, and they’ll sit you down, you know, like a
little child, this is how the world really runs, you know, people are
just, they’re too undisciplined and crazy to have a thing called democracy,
as you think of it. We’ll give you a democracy,
so we’ll give you A, B, C, D, E to vote from, this panel of people, and
that’s as far as your democracy’s going to go.
Now, this A, B, C and D and E, etc., they all
serve other organizations that are supranational. And some of them you don’t
even know exist, these organizations.
But they’re all around you. And you go all the way back, if you delve
into it and get wrinkles and gray hair delving into this stuff, you see how far
back this particular overlay of the system, which is
seldom talked about, you see, except in bits and pieces but never as a complete
overlay of the system, is about eugenics and too many of you.
Unless you are one of them, meaning the ultrarich, you see, and from very good
old families, you see. It isn’t just to be, just to be rich. You’ve got to belong to very old families
who’ve bred into other rich old families down through centuries, if possible.
Look into the Darwinian groups and the ones in
London, there’s still one in London, it’s the Darwin Club, they changed the
name of it. They had the website there. They were quite open about themselves
and all of you, you see, and you are the problem. Going all the way back
to Malthus and even before Malthus. You could get executed in the Middle Ages
in Britain and elsewhere if you inadvertently rubbed against some member of
nobility by accident, or if you fell or they fell on you, or stumbled or whatever.
You see, you were the lowest thing on the planet, by your monarchy and
so on, you are the lowest thing. You
were a different species, long before they coined eugenics and
Darwinism, you see. Although they claim
the term eugenics comes from the Greek, of course.
But anyway, the fact is, that’s reality. At one
time you could be locked up in jail in parts of Europe, including Britain, if
the peasants found a silk handkerchief or a scarf. Because only the wealthy
elite were allowed, allowed to
wear them. Now, that attitude has not died away, believe you me. Even in the hard-communist
countries you never find a defector, and the defector’s came from an upper-class
of bureaucracy in the Soviet bloc countries, who lived just as well and
sometimes better than their counterparts in the West, financially,
material and all the other benefits. None of them ever defected, and they tell
you that in their writings, because they were deprived of
and they wanted things from the West. None of them did it for that reason. It
was for ideological reasons.
You’re living in a system today where there’s a
pretense getting used, again, by those at the very, very top, and using what
appears to be left, to bring in the Disney version, again, of a happy world,
where everybody will be happy and you’ll all be equal as long as no one’s got a
different opinion from the authorized one, on anything. And that’s the fear
today. And it really doesn’t look good for people who still want some kind of
democracy, a say in
things. Even the right to complain, that
will go too.
You can always read
the letters that were exchanged between George Orwell in 1984 the book, and
Aldous Huxley and his Brave New World.
Basically Huxley thought that there were many, many more scientific techniques
that could be used to sway the public and alter the public and train the public
and even shape the public, including altering DNA and so on, and perfecting
types of workers, or worker bees, for division of labor, different types, and
using drugs on them and different other techniques too. Whereas Orwell of
course, he used in 1984, he actually published
in 1948, and I think it was called The Last Man initially. That’s what he wanted it to be called but his
publisher changed it to 1984, because it was published in 1948, or put
out then. Orwell’s system, I’ve said it
before, it would be an intermediary system to get to Brave New World.
And we’re going through both of them right now.
You constantly read about from, again,
publications, scientific publications on DNA alteration and the different kinds
of in vitro fertilization, the so-called taking out of defective or bad
genes and replacing them with supposedly good ones, etc. etc. It’s the dream
of those who envisage power over the whole planet from long ago. It’s a dream
which they’re working towards. Because it goes right back again to eugenics
and, well… You’d be surprised if you could get into the old, old libraries in
Britain that still have some books left, you’d find lots of books churned out
over a long period of time over the criminal class, and how do we alter
the criminal class and stop it? They had all kinds of theories then of
altering, the finding out if they could get out, find out if there was a marker
in their genetic makeup that would make them be a criminal, a gene in other
words, a defective gene or string of them or whatever, and how they could
replace them. All that stuff has been discussed.
Now [Alan chuckles.] just as easily, don’t forget
that anybody can be labeled a criminal. As laws get passed. And speech is
coming down to being criminalized. Which always goes that route too, the 1984
method of threatening the public, and again, taking away liberties and rights,
or to even exist. It’s interesting to me that the Chinese system, the social
credit system, is what’s coming down here now under different guises of
terrorism, fighting terrorism. And that’ll go the same way, the same way. It’s already there actually, they’ve got it
all mapped out in fact, it’s a copy. And
I’m pretty sure the West designed it for China anyway. But you’re going to find
they’re already pulling away people’s finances. They’re try to get people off
the Internet altogether, going through the providers, etc., and they’ll simply
isolate someone, just like in China. If you’ve been behind in loan payments in
China, you can’t travel anywhere, just can’t get on, you know, transportation
to even visit someone or whatever. You’re stuck. You’re punished in many, many
ways as a bad person.
But this is where we are now in the West,
the so-called countries of freedom, that’s what it used to be called. But of course, freedom isn’t efficient
because freedom has too many opinions, according to those who want total
control. And I’m not surmising this. I’ve read the books from the Club of Rome,
in detail, very detailed books on step-by-step policies that they want, that
they’d like to introduce to the United Nations, etc. It’s terrifying really
looking at it when you know what it means. When you see it happening in your
lifetime too, where they just might target bunches of people. It will start off
being, going for the real, real dogmatic people who are really
crazy types, you know, who are… Or else they’re fake.
If you want something passed on the Internet, and
we had that years ago, remember, with all the fake sock puppets they called
them. People didn’t know that a lot of these arguments, the sites on the forums
where they all argue like crazy, were actually just
all done by computers. You were getting hammered and hammered and folk were
getting, oh, they’re spending their life trying to write back and fight back to
what they thought was real people. They were sock puppets put out by government
and the government admitted that, different
Pentagon organizations and MIT ones admitted that. It hasn’t changed, folks. So,
it could be quite easy, and don’t… And hhhhhhhch, it’s even better to me. Anybody can be anonymous
on the net if they want to be, the ones who can really afford it. Like agencies and so on at the top, could put
out sites there and try and get a little following, or even claim they’ve got a
following, and start advocating terrible things to the other people. And the
government will step in right away and…
You see how you can set something up to make happen, to get what
you want and say, SEE, SEE, you know, there you go, SEE. That’s how it’s
done.
In the world of intelligence agencies, it’s all
deception. It’s deception, that’s
how they work is through deception. And those who are deceived will do the
bidding of those who are the deceivers.
They’re basically unwitting, you know, stooges basically, most of them.
And you can’t, this is the terrifying thing…
I remember many years ago in Britain, I’d heard this before, of
something similar, I guess there were shootings or something maybe back in the
70s or whatever. It was a lawyer, it was a woman from the US on television who
was talking back to a panel in Britain, maybe the BBC or something, some
organization, a show she was on. And the person was saying, why can’t you just
do this and do that and so on? And someone answered her, someone had gotten off
with what was a perceived crime, you see. Now, anything that’s tried in the
newspapers can be touted to be the most heinous crime that ever happened. I
mean, you’re judged by the media, you see, and so that’s not what law is about.
They can target anybody and make them a leper to society. Very quickly and easy.
And so, you can’t go by that.
But again, you can see the forces being whipped
up today to use social media to do the judging, you see. Because everyone’s got
their prejudices out there. Absolutely.
It’s easy to stir them up. Very easy, in fact. But the lawyer that was on the
television show said, well the reason this person, who very possibly, she said,
very possibly was guilty got off with it, our system is set up to ensure and to
prefer that a few folk might go free rather than have one person tried and
put in prison falsely. That's how you had all these different safeguards. In
Britain you don't have that problem.
Because you had justices of the peace and so on that were basically like
[Alan chuckles.] judge, jury and executioner in a sense most of the time. So that was the difference with the US.
They'd rather have a few people going free, and very iffy, iffy, you know, not
guilty charges, very iffy, rather than have one person get put inside who
wasn't guilty.
But again, when you're in a completely, when
you're going into this totalitarian, and actually when
you're in this totalitarian system you can see the anger and
fury out there like never before. Now, that's coming from organization,
across the board, to make it all happen at once. I remember when Obama was in,
it went fairly smoothly the whole time he was in,
where he did his trips to see the Queen, the usual stuff they all do and things
like that. And press reports that there were more wars apparently on the go at
the time, he took over from the previous group and Rumsfeld congratulated him
in the media for continuing those wars. But there was no backlash on
anything.
And I'm really, I don't vote for parties,
myself. Because I'm well aware that it's the closest
thing you're going to get, at the moment, for anything called democracy. I
know that they all serve the same masters. Obviously. Since the same
agendas continue. As Thomas Jefferson
said, when you see that you’re under a form of tyranny,
because different parties would have different programs, they'd cancel
different things too, but you find the
same programs continuing, especially to do with wars and so on.
So really, all we got at the
moment is the right to say something.
When that's taken away, it will not bode well for anybody. Because
tyranny doesn't stop. It's got a, as I say, it's like the end of the train, a
train has these barriers at the end of the line, but tyranny will keep moving
the barriers, like new records all the time. That's how it works unfortunately.
Until you've got horror on the go.
And today with the scientific techniques of
manipulation, through drugs of all kinds, that are prescribed, even with
experimentation to do with electrical fields on the brain and so on, there's so
much can be done on people without their, nevermind without their knowledge,
without their consent, especially. So, you've got to be awfully careful. And
don't get whipped, I keep telling folk, don't get whipped up by emotion.
Because the ones who are whipped up are getting used, someone's using them. And
right now the ones at the top want the conflict to bring in the new system.
I hope you understand that.
They want the conflict to get this new system
through. It has to
appear, oh, drastic and radical because of what appears to be, and again,
appears to be radical times, so you stir it up. Then you come out with the solution. And you have to go
into a new system. It's a completely new century, that literally is to be post-Democratic.
I've read all the articles before and a lot from their own writings and their
books and so on from universities, etc. post Democratic, where they can just
get things done and tidy up all the loose ends. And you'll have experts guiding your whole
lives from birth to death. Including, do they even need you to be born? That's
coming down the pike too.
So, I hope you’re understanding [Alan laughing.] what I'm… What I'm saying is, is not to
terrify anybody. It's just simply to be aware of it. To be aware of it. And
don't fall into so many traps. Because right now the whole system is full of traps.
Of course, it is. Everyone's being monitored. Everyone's being automatically
monitored. They're not going to spend million dollars just to watch you.
They're watching everybody. And it's done with computer systems that
automatically gather all the data on us all, each individually. They only do a person once in a blue moon if
you're flagged so often that they want to, you know, do something about you, basically.
That's what it's about.
It's so sad that in the 90s I said, you'll get
maybe 20 years of freedom, a partial freedom on the Internet, until you're
hooked on it. So much will be free, then
they'll start drawing that in until you start paying for more. Then of course
by the end of it, restrictions of freedoms. Folk will stay on it. That's what
they hope for. And that's why they gave you 20 years. If they'd told you up front,
you're going to pay for this and pay for that and we're watching you, you
wouldn't have, they wouldn't have sold the same way. They told you it was a private,
it was your personal computer, it's yours, it's private.
You understand, everything that's sold to us is done through big expensive
public relations companies. Every little phrase is put across there to calm you
and to lead you, is given to you, for goodness sake. Everything that the
politicians say is written by scriptwriters. That's the world we live in. And
you have to accept, you really do, that there's a vast
amount of different people in the world.
As this is a world. And you have
to accept a lot of stuff. And a lot of stuff too you shouldn't have to
accept. There is stuff you just simply can't accept, obviously. When you see
the incredible, incredible drug system of Latin America, and the viciousness, incredible
viciousness of the powers that run it all, you don't want to be like that. You really don't. I don't think you do, do
you? And again, back in the 90s I said, you know, what I’d say, because I was
sometimes asked on some of the shows, can't you give us a happy ending? You
see, this is... Watch Starsuckers, you're trained to want happy endings.
We don't live in Disneyland. A lot of what
happens in the world doesn't have happy endings for lots of people. But if you
really want to know, and most folk don't, and I'm aware of that, and I don't
blame them. But for the ones that want to know, make sure you can handle it.
Make sure you can really handle it. And if you have a family there, look after
them. Make sure they can handle it. Safeguard them from the world as much as
possible and for what's coming down. If you can. Because the only defense
you'll have is your own mind eventually.
And if you're defense is your own mind, is seen
as a weapon against whatever authoritarian tyranny is coming down in the
future, then obviously you're going to be an enemy. Just because you
understand. And where we are today, and I said this would happen, I gave
examples of Brave New World when the so-called savages picked up from
outside the high-tech system that they lived in, he lived in the wilds. There were some folk who still bred normally
outside of it. They brought them into this fabulous futuristic city where
nobody lacked anything. And all sex was actually advocated,
not just for free love and all that, it was advocated. And with certain
conditions that you couldn't have the same partner more than twice a week or
something like that. So promiscuity, all the things, and variety was promoted.
And it was all fun, fun and transient superficial fun in the high-tech city
type system. When people live to a good
long age of course, and they didn't have the old-age diseases because they were
all bred basically artificially, and genetically manipulated to pretty will
guarantee they would be the Alpha, Beta or whatever it happens to be that they
were meant to be by the scientists. Then
they would just suddenly, rather quickly, towards a long lifespan, just simply
die. And they were taught not to grieve at the dying. The children were brought
in to have little kind of party songs and told how happy they should be that
these people. You see?
So we’re going through all that, folks. But the
primitive, when he tried to ask them about things that really stuck to them,
and having a family and children, not the state bringing up children, you would
know who your parents were, etc. Which, gave you a
link to the past and all the generations before you, or as many as you knew
about. And that was so important to the psyche of the savage. But the people
who lived in the city, they weren't nasty to him or angry about it to him, what
he was talking about. They were polite. And they laughed politely. But that's
the key, they laughed politely at him... thinking he was kind of quaint and
strange, not just old-fashioned in his ways and his thoughts. Because his idea
of beauty was good literature, for instance, or Shakespeare stories and things
like that. And to them that was all just nonsense and passé. They lived for quick thrills all the time.
That's where we are today. Most folk like that
system. It's not quite there but you can get the vision of it as it
materializes around us. But most folk
like the system. As they say, you can't blame them. And they’ll go along with
any change that comes their way. Even to their detriment down the road. As
Aldous Huxley said, they'll accept
things that perhaps you shouldn't accept. You persuaded into them with
techniques you don't understand are even being used on you. That's the sad
part.
But really, I've never seen such organized push, we're
living through what we saw, what the world's saw really around the time of the
late 1800s, of anarchism, what appeared to be anarchism, and revolutionaries.
We're seeing it promoted, and obviously directed. And funded. And we haven't
seen our own government step in to stop it. That's awfully telling. Because it
means there's a higher structure and those at the top know to stand off, it's
meant to happen, and bring in a new system of austerity.
It ties in with all the bank bail-ins that will
happen next. Because they're talking
right now, as they said they would after the 2007/8 collapsed. They said it
would take another eight or nine years before the next wave hits them, of
payback time. The currencies have all been devalued incredibly since then by
the way. Then you’ll be brought into a
state of… What the elite would love to have is a
rationing system. Rationing. Because of a crisis situation. And all you hear is crisis, crisis,
crisis, oh, we're frying and were being baked off the planet and all this kind
of stuff. Crisis, crisis.
That's what they hit upon, the Club of Rome said it too, we hit upon this,
that man would be the enemy, therefore
man was the enemy of the planet, that would fit the bill. That's what
they all agreed upon. And when they agree, when all those different
organizations agree, it's like an old, they'll all stand firm with it, till the
end. Regardless of contrary evidence, etc.
Now, I meant to read an awful lot of articles
tonight, [Alan chuckles.] but as usual I
prattled on. Because I don't plan these
talks. Or if I do have a vague plan, I generally don't [Alan chuckles.]
continue it at all, [Alan chuckles.] or even get near it sometimes. I like to talk to people as though I was
talking to someone across the table just having a chat. So anyway, I'll mention some articles here
just to sort of fit in with maybe what I've been saying. Maybe. Here's an article
here and it says…
'We’re almost out of ammo’: Reserve Bank considering ‘extreme measures’ to save economy - news.com.au / 15 Aug 2019
So they're talking about, Reserve Bank to start, again, quantitative easing. Which
means nothing except inflation, folks. More and more and more money buying
less and less and less as it's inflated basically, they devalue your
currencies. And so, Australia is coming
out and mentioning and all the rest of it too, underemployment they say, and
the hidden work epidemic is hurting Australians, so their reserve bank, their
central bank is really coming out with it too.
And mind you, you’re finding all the central
banks are going along with the same mantra right now. As they do. Everything is global, folks. It is global. It
has been for a long time. And it was meant to be, all the centralized banking
systems and the Bank for International Settlements. The IMF too. I was going
through stacks of stuff from the IMF today and it was just astonishing how much
the information they’re putting out themselves, if you care to go into their
sites, you can go in there. And most folk, again, can’t be bothered doing that
digging. But it’s interesting [Alan chuckles.] if you can stand a few more gray
hairs and watch your life just slip away from you. But it is interesting. They
have their own terminology, naturally, because they don’t want the average
person understanding what they’re on about. It really is quite amazing to watch
them. And austerity measures, etc., all these things, these are the terms
they’re all using now.
And then you have this one here too. This article
is not too bad actually. It says…
How China gets what it wants from American companies - money.cnn.com / 5 April 2018
Now, you're always hearing about, oh, everyone's
quite happy chomping away and being quite content until the politics from
different nations, or companies that run your country combat other countries’
companies at the top, because every country is run by companies, big
corporations. It really doesn't get into the complete free trade agreements
which were signed. And you have to dig into them
actually if you want to understand anything at all. Because don't forget, when
China was given free trade access by the WTO, the World Trade Organization, the
deal, and I did so many talks on it too, as we floated through everything
getting made in China.
Our companies were paid by our governments using
our tax money to move to China. You have no idea the amount of operation
this was. And China was to be exempt from paying taxes basically, from stuff it
would send back, all the goods and services sent back to your countries, all
the products, they could be free of import duties in your countries, but they
could charge import duties on your stuff going to them, for I think 15 years.
And it could be repeated for another 15 years if they claimed it wasn't going
so well and the companies that moved over there, if they claim they weren't
getting the full, that they'd lost profits until they were fully up and running
over many years, they could also live tax-free for a while, the same deal. So
anyway, here you have “How China gets what it wants from American companies”.
Because you're supposed to have a balance of trade. Well, the balance of trade
has just been a big, like a seesaw with the end pointing at the ground towards
China, as all the cash [Alan laughing.] runs towards China. Then when it comes
to importing, it's the opposite way around, it's all flowing from China, you
see, we don't make much anymore, in a service economy.
But it was planned that way. It was planned that
way. And the free trade agreement they made for the so-called Common Market,
which turned into the European Union with a central Parliament, is the big
boss. That's what they sold there too, was the idea to have free trade and you
wouldn't pay all these taxes and so on. But now they're up to their eyes in
debt, in a service economy. They had the articles out in the 1970s about that.
So, this isn't... this free... this service economy idea, it's perfectly understood
that top economists wrote incredible, well documented publications out in the
1970s in Britain and in the European countries about what it meant to be a
service economy. You paddle, and it's like a dog in a swimming pool, you paddle
and paddle until you can't, your energy is gone. You're not producing anything.
And you start borrowing money. Then you're in debt. And when you're in debt
you're owned. And who owns you is the boss. That's how it works.
Anyway, I'll put this article up, “How China gets
what it wants from American companies”. Because naturally they want to continue
the same way with the same imbalance of trade.
And let's be honest, how can you possibly simply balance trade
anyway? It's not an exact thing. If
they're making it, they've got the factories in China and you don't have them
here, how can you possibly compete with it? You can't compete with it.
It's nonsense. We're all in the same
boat basically. But I'll put this one up
and you can read the articles and how they are in talks to avoid a trade war it
says.
Another article is, again, how they're pushing
the same thing the CFR was pushing a few years ago when they said it's time that the big powerful people like
Bill Gates and so on, the big philanthropists took their proper role in
governance of the world. Well, we don't vote for these folks. Do you
realize we're getting a new system introduced with you acquiescing to it, and
yes, you acquiesced because you don't say anything about it, because you don't
quite get what they're saying to you. [Alan
chuckles.] You sort of.... You can't
have a democracy and you can't work alongside folk who are just self appointing
themselves because they're all incredibly wealthy and powerful. That's not a
democracy.
Can big investors save the world? - bbc.com / 18 Aug 2019
You also have…
Stratospheric aerosol injection tactics (Alan: …which they're using at the moment, they worked out the cost...) and costs in the first 15 years of deployment -. Iopscience.iop.org / 23 Nov 2018
They've been using them since 1998 of
course. We were all called crazy when we
all came out and said that in 1998, the people who actually
noticed them. Everybody thought you were nuts... because they said you
were nuts, and the media's saying you're nuts, and the television would say
you're nuts. And the general public
would go along with it because they don't think for themselves. Again, authority figures say that you're nuts
so it must be true. But now of course,
it's out. And it's okay now that it's out, there's no big fuss about it. Hm. To
save the world, you understand. But one of many articles. So I've got this one here and I've got
another one too from Harvard.
Harvard panel oversees geoengineering project - nature.com / 30 July 2019
Because Harvard has got stacks of stuff out there
on stratospheric aerosol injection and different techniques too of supposedly
cutting the sunlight hitting the earth. They aren’t shy about it. Of course, it's just stuff that they want,
they're trying, or want to try. They never mention the fact they've been doing
it since 1998. Because if you get the bill for all the folks that have been
dying off of respiratory diseases, [Alan chuckles.] I think it would put them all under.
Could dimming the
sun save the Earth?
(A: Once again, you've got this person doing
his... the philanthropist, you understand, the same guy who decides what he
wants to do across the world, he...)
Bill Gates wants
to spray millions of tonnes of dust into the
stratosphere to stop global warming... (A: …global warming, you see…) but critics
fear it could trigger calamity
dailymail.co.uk / 12 Aug 2019
You’re a critic if you say that's bad for you,
breathing in stuff like aluminum oxide and various others, and cadmium and all
the others, it's not… It's probably good for you, I guess they could convince
you that it is good for you. If they
tell you it's going to save us all, it must be good for us, right? There you go.
I'll put that article up too.
And Greenspan, I remember Greenspan before when
he used to come out, like some royalty.
And all the media would present him, in the 80s and 90s, if he stepped
out there, it was all silence, just like, the King is going to speak. And he’d stand there and look at his
audience, then he’d just… Good show
business, awfully good, he would just, he wouldn’t say it right away, whatever
he was going to, then he just says, “cool
it.” And that’s all he’d say. And
the media would go, wow, wow, Greenspan says “cool it,” the economy, you
know, investments and so on, too hot. But now he says…
Ex-Fed boss Greenspan says ‘there is no barrier’ to Treasury yields falling below zero - marketwatch.com / 16 Aug 2019
So you're in this negative interest rate [Alan
chuckles.] where you will be charged for
everything, naturally. If you're still using the banks, because most folk are cashless,
so you have to use the banking system, weather they go
to a real bank or not. Then they can use that money overnight, they can lend it
out across the planet, any savings that you have. And make a good killing off it, off millions
of people savings, overnight. And then give them no return at all. That's not
bad. It's a good deal. And it's a new
normal. And most folk already are quite used to it since the crash in 2007/8.
Also…
Our Meatless Future: How The $90B Global Meat Market Gets Disrupted - cbinsights.com / 16 Jan 2019
You're going to see more and more of this as they
try and get you off meat. Because that's a big one for the guys at the top that
run the planet. I should say, men and women actually because
we are equal opportunity tyrants, that's what we have. At least that's Democratic, I suppose. And
I've got one here too…
Leaked climate
change report says we must change eating habits to save the world
metro.co.uk / 5 Aug 2019
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is currently meeting in Geneva to debate issues relating to the environment.
Remember too, the whole point of it, and they
admitted it years ago, is to start cutting population. And you do it by
removing energy. That's heat in the winter, electricity, etc. And air
conditioning for the hot places. And then you start reducing all the different
types of high protein foods that you can get. For those who haven't quite
figured it out yet. And then you’ll be
prone to what Bertrand Russell suggested, having a good black plague every
generation or so, maybe twice a generation, to reduce the population. Again…
Could the next
sin tax fall on red meat?
accountingtoday.com / 13 Aug 2019
Meat could be a target for higher taxes given criticism of the industry’s role in climate change...
So, it's all your fault, you see. And they give
you amazing statistics here which have no bearing in reality
about how much of the land is used for farming. It's pretty
tiny really when you think about it. I've got stuff going way back to
even documents from the 50s and 60s which talked about bringing down the amount of farms that are allowed to operate. Because it's
too many people living healthily, by the way. And these are from official
sources at the top.
But anyway, it's all your fault for living. It's
all your fault that those who want to be in charge, who think they are in charge of the planet, see their own future being
disrupted by all of you. You know, because these folk at the top want to go on
forever with their own children and offspring, all the better people, you
see. But all of you, you've gotta cut
back and start chomping on stuff that's…
Have you any idea of the snobbery involved in
organic, in basically vegetarianism? You've got classes of them now boasting
about what they can afford for hyper organic foods, the stuff that's never seen
the rain from the sky, it's from deep wells and stuff under domes. I read the
articles years ago. Now it's in your
face. It's like the brand-name stuffs
for bags they used to have, the women years ago if you were anybody at all you
had to have the right handbag or whatever purse or whatever it was. Or watch. And it's the same thing, same
technique, snob appeal, and they boast about what they can afford for the best
kinds of truly organic, and non-genetically modified too, no pesticides,
nothing to keep insects off because they're grown under these basically sealed
conditions, the air is filtered into them and so on. Amazing.
That first started off I think in Japan, that's
where it broke years ago, under the domed ones. And then Germany and other
countries too. Then we find out they're
all over the place for the ultra wealthy and elite. And the politicians often
get actual cards to them. Hm. Interesting.
But the rest of us at the bottom, well, you know, just... That's it, you see. If you had the right
genes, you understand, you wouldn't be so poor as you are now, that's what they
tell you. You see.
So, this is pure eugenics. Survival of the
fittest. Meaning that most, if you were fit, you see, you'd be rich and
powerful, etc. etc. Important. You'd be a somebody, as the royalty used
to say at the parties. When folk came
into the parties, and they'd say, who's that, they'd say, you know, to
the top butler or somebody. Is that person somebody? Oh no, he's not a
somebody, my Lord, you know. That's… We're still here. We're still there,
folks. You never get rid of that. Never. I don't care, even if there's no
royalty you could never get rid of it. It's in human nature. Unfortunately.
President Bolsonaro tells Brazilians (A: ...he's their president...) to 'poop every other day' to help save the environment as he comes under fire for a surge in Amazon deforestation - dailymail.co.uk / 12 Aug 2019
So, there you go. So, don't eat meat, right,
that's what the rest of them are telling you, and you can start to control, you
know, other habits as well. It's not going to stop. It's not going to stop. Really. It's not.
But I want to just touch on this too tonight,
it's awfully important because…
Canada joins
Christchurch Call to Action (A:
...after the big shooting in Christchurch they had…) to eliminate
terrorist and violent extremist content online
pm.gc.ca / 15 May 2019
(A: And that's wide-open, violent extremist, or
extremist content, right. You're right
into the tyranny of socialism and censorship. And believe you me, it will go,
it will be even further than China's at the moment.
Because people who are given power to act as judges over the existence of other
people, are terrifying people. They're terrifying. They really are. Human
nature doesn't change, folks. I don't care what era you live in, it's much the
same, really. It doesn't change.)
The internet bridges divides and helps us build... (A: …blah, blah, blah.)
But it has also increasingly become a tool for terrorism and violent extremism.
(A: So they go on through this too and they got
a...)
National Strategy on Countering Radicalization to Violence, which the Government of Canada launched in December 2018. (A: ...by the way.)
And they're chomping at the bit to go. Because they've already been listening to
conversations of Canadians, on the phone, and putting everybody into the
categories, for those who don't know that.
They want to go to the next step now, where you won't even be able to
feed yourself. This is where the social credit system is going. It's an excuse
basically for tyranny, I believe. And
most folk are terrified into complying.
Even the majority of people who really don't
know anything outside of the regular 6 o'clock news on television, that's how
your coerced into it, they'll find out quickly what they can say, what they
can't say, what they can… right down to eventually what do you think... what
do you think.
A few years ago, I mentioned about the GIRFEC
program being carried out in Scotland, they had one for England too, a
different name in Wales, where every child got an advocate basically assigned
to them by the government. Every child, at birth. They would start monitoring
them for any oddball thoughts, or if they didn't get on with every
person that they'd met, even if it's in kindergarten for goodness sake, to see
if they got any possible radicalization instincts in them already. So they
could basically, you know, undo and tighten different bolts in your neck I
guess and your head, before you grow up to be an adult. This is horrific,
the thought of this, what's going on here. Horrific.
But they also wanted from the various psychiatric
associations when they started up years ago, a long time ago, the right to
test everybody all through their lifetime on psychological evaluation.
Well, since psychology and psychiatry is heavily, heavily politicized,
according to the culture of the time, and the trends of the time, what an
incredible tyranny that would be. Well, they still want that, folks. They still
do want that. Honestly. And they have the
behavioral insights teams already monitoring us all, in all the countries, I
did talks on that before. We are paying them to monitor us. And these characters are acting like judges
over us. All the time.
Well, I guess you’d better just throw your free
thought and free speech and your democracy out the window and make it official,
for goodness sake. Really. This is sad.
And it’s, phew, rather scary. There’s no
system where they’ll get everyone agreeing on the same things all the time.
It’s just impossible. And you have to accept that. It doesn’t mean you can’t have
different systems of managing conflict or preventing conflict. Of course, you
can. But no, this heavy, heavy hand… until
we’re all supposed to be clones of everybody else, clones of your tyrants’
desired puppet, you know, they want to make us all into puppets. That’s not
living.
I mentioned too that with this tremendous hype,
and everybody is I think fed up, because once the Epstein story goes, they’ll
have nothing else to talk about really these days. Except, how are the rich and
famous doing and your celebrities, the stars, etc. Because there’s nothing else
out there, really. And Epstein was a good story for a while because it
had all, as I said before, it had all the different parts of intrigue. It made a good movie and it’s gone now
too.
Jeffrey Epstein and the Myth of the ‘Underage Woman’ - theatlantic.com / 15 Aug 2019
But I said it would bring in eventually the talk,
if he was still alive, they’d have the debates in court, they’d work it out in
court and use it as a form basically to put the next step across. I’m sure they
would. Because it’s a system, not Epstein but the system is pushing to do away
with these ideas of age limits. So…
France votes
against setting minimum age of sexual consent amid backlash
telegraph.co.uk / 17 May 2018
(A: And that was from last year
actually.)
President McCrone accused of missing opportunity to protect minors.
(A: So I'll put that article up for those that
want to read it themselves [Alan chuckles.] and don't believe it. But it is there. And it's from the Independent I believe.)
Women demonstrate to call for legislative change to set a minimum legal age…
But they won't do it, you see. And this is where it's going. I knew it would
too anyway, but this is what they've been wanting for a while, the
intergenerational sexual activity, is what they've said at the top, over years.
Another one says…
Drop age of
consent to 14, says academic
telegraph.co.uk / 16 Feb 2007
(A: And that was from another newspaper in the
UK. It says…)
The legal age of consent should be lowered from 16 to 14 for young people who are less than two years apart in age, according to an academic.
…so I guess a 16-year-old person with a
14-year-old, I guess that's what they're saying here. But of course, it’s to bring it all
down. And step-by-step you can knock the pillars down, eventually there's no
pillars left, and they'll have intergenerational sex at any age, that's really
what it's about. We know this. We know it, folks. They’ve written about it. And
they've sexualized, hyper sexualized all of society since the 60s with the
culture, you know, being changed through television and movies. People are addicted to television and movies,
addicted to them, and all your opinions pretty well
come through fiction today, they really do, you adapt to them very quickly. You
adapt into them and adopt them.
And then you have... hhhuh,
an historic Airport in Berlin, this Tempelhof it's called, is now a drive-in,
changing it to drive-in sex booths as, again, we go down the tubes and so on.
Drive-in sex booths proposed for Berlin's historic Tempelhof airport - cnn.com / 14 Aug 2019
They've got so many prostitutes and, well, rape
problems too. Prostitution and drugs, of course, that's getting, it's so bad
everywhere. But society is, again, being
pushed into it. This is nothing, there's nothing new. They had the articles out
at universities in the 70s and 80s about the coming massive transformation of
society. And we're living through it today, still, you know. There's more to come. It wasn’t unforeseen.
And they were teaching this stuff at universities in various social sciences
and so on. And then you have…
Lawyers say
Epstein victims to sue financier's estate this week
Reuters.com / 11 Aug 2019
The "Child Victims Act," which takes effect on Aug. 14, gives people a year to sue over allegations of sexual abuse, regardless of when the alleged acts occurred.
But I do want to mention the fact, we’re really
going into the next phase of austerity. I used to do talks on that, after that
last crash, and how they churned out all these different articles and PDFs,
other publications from universities on it, on high finance, etc., investments.
Because the next step of the plan, and from the United Nations too, was to
bring us into austerity, folks. That means, oh, we can’t live like this
anymore, you’re living too well. And if you live too well then, you’re
healthy, you eat well. And if you eat well, you might have more children. And
if you eat well, that means you can afford good food and more children, etc.,
etc. And every child, they worked it
out too, every child born needs this, this, this, this and this, and they will
consume… And they’ve all worked out how much you’re going to consume per person
from being a baby all the way through your life. It’s just incredible. Talk about eugenics.
And believe you me, thet’re
are awfully, awfully nasty people out there with big, big plans. And to be
honest with you, I really don’t, don’t see how you can avoid them.
Because the power, what’s happening today was planned a long time ago and
step-by-step folk have given up their right to participate, and even bombard
their different agencies from government, bombard them with different kinds of
complaints or objections or something. But we don’t really get information
anymore in the new system, do we?
Not so long ago they used to publish all the time
of bills that were coming up, in all countries, before they were passed and so
on. So’s the public, the whole idea was
so folk could say, no, that’s terrible, we can have that, etc. etc. And
then they can get in touch with their politicians and say, you vote for that
one, we won’t vote for you again.
But they don’t even tell you anything anymore. It’s simply done quietly.
So, we’re not in democracy. We’re in this
intermediary phase between democracy and basically the expert management system
as they call it, a world run by experts for a socialistic type
system. Where the CFR said they were awfully close, and their goal was to
communism. Because they like that
system, it’s easier to control everybody. If you simply are brought up in a
system where you obey, you’re trained to obey, that’s it, folks.
Anyway, sorry for hammering on, but I’ll put the
links up tonight. And for those who want to go into it, and the banking system
too... You should really look at
it because they’re all getting ready for the next phase of austerity. And with
it comes, really, inflation. Which means more and more your money’s worth less
and less all the time. Less all the time. It’s incredible.
I read something about one of the actors back in
the early 1900s, in the old silent. He was supposedly the richest actor of his
era. He got something like about 1 1/2 or, well, maybe 2 1/2 maybe three,
maximum, million dollars in his time.
And when they said, [Alan chuckles.] it was worth about 500 million today [Alan
laughing.] I mean really, that's what it
would be, that's what you would need to buy the same kind of things, the
purchasing power of the dollar in the States was back then. I might be off with
the figures a bit but that gives you an idea of how crazy it is, really, ‘eh.
And it all happened through bank crashes, which
are never fixed. Because it's not meant to be fixed. We've been living on a
fake system for a long time. A long,
long time. And it's backed by nothing, really.
So, accept the promise to pay by those who supposedly… And so much of it’s
written off through loans to other countries. Which can't afford, they can
never afford to pay it back. And it's understood that they couldn't. But that's another story.
Anyway, sorry to prattle on like this tonight
but... I hope folk, and I know that folk are, by the emails and so on, watching
what's happening. Because they do
understand that we’re going into the next phase of the new system of governing,
you might say. We're in it, really. It's
just a matter of training the public that they’re in it now. I think that's
what it really is.
Now remember, you can help me tick along and keep
going by donating @cuttingthroughthematrix.com website. There you'll find out how to send money. [Order and donation options listed
above.] You can also list all the other
sites I have on the .com site, which are mine. Remember, order your
books and discs @cuttingtothematrix.com or one of the sites listed on
that particular site.
And, don't
lose your cool. Keep calm. If your emotion gets the better of you, because you
look at something or listen to something or whatever gets you angry, you're
being, you'll get used. And you are being used. Keep a cool head.
It's better on your own health too.
So for myself from Ontario Canada, I'm Alan Watt
and may your God or gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following
links:
Reserve Bank
considering ‘extreme measures’ to save economy
news.com.au / 15 Aug 2019
Ex-Fed boss
Greenspan says ‘there is no barrier’ to Treasury yields falling below zero
marketwatch.com / 16 Aug 2019
How China gets
what it wants from American companies
money.cnn.com / 5 April 2018
Can big investors
save the world?
bbc.com / 18 Aug 2019
Stratospheric
aerosol injection tactics and costs in the first 15 years of deployment
iopscience.iop.org / 23 Nov 2018
Harvard panel
oversees geoengineering project
nature.com / 30 July 2019
Could dimming the
sun save the Earth? Bill Gates wants to spray millions of tonnes
of dust into the stratosphere to stop global warming... but critics fear it
could trigger calamity
dailymail.co.uk / 12 Aug 2019
Our Meatless
Future: How The $90B Global Meat Market Gets Disrupted
cbinsights.com / 16 Jan 2019
Leaked climate
change report says we must change eating habits to save the world
metro.co.uk / 5 Aug 2019
Could the next
sin tax fall on red meat?
accountingtoday.com / 13 Aug 2019
President
Bolsonaro tells Brazilians to 'poop every other day' to help save the
environment as he comes under fire for a surge in Amazon deforestation
dailymail.co.uk / 12 Aug 2019
Canada joins
Christchurch Call to Action to eliminate terrorist and violent extremist content
online
pm.gc.ca / 15 May 2019
Canada's Digital
Charter: Trust in a digital world
ic.gc.ca
Drop age of
consent to 14, says academic
telegraph.co.uk / 16 Feb 2007
France votes
against setting minimum age of sexual consent amid backlash
telegraph.co.uk / 17 May 2018
Jeffrey Epstein
and the Myth of the ‘Underage Woman’
theatlantic.com / 15 Aug 2019
Lawyers say
Epstein victims to sue financier's estate this week
jpost.com / 12 Aug 2019
Drive-in sex
booths proposed for Berlin's historic Tempelhof airport
cnn.com / 14 Aug 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering
Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3
CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and
'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality
Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom,
Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||