Apr. 7, 2019 (#1715)
"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan
Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)
A Blink in Time:
"Changes Fast and Furious Causing
Alienation,
Power,
Always Prodding to Mind Your Station."
© Alan Watt Apr. 7, 2019
*Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt -
Apr. 7, 2019 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS: CTTM
P.O. Box 815
Keene, TX
76059 USA
EMAIL: alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com
(Because of
bombardment of Trojans and Downloader Viruses and Spyware, will be deleting ALL
mail containing attachments.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF
ALAN WATT
cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
cuttingthroughthematrix.net,
cuttingthroughthematrix.us,
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca
MIRROR SITE
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
INTERNATIONAL AND
MULTILINGUAL SITE
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The
Matrix on April 7, 2019. As always,
I wish all the best to those out there who tune in all the time to listen to
the talks, and have been tuning in actually for many
years, many of them. There's
always new ones coming in too, new people, and younger audiences as well
looking for different things and explanations to really what it's all about
basically, like the old movie said, what it's all about, Alfie.
While I think everybody goes through the same
phases and stages of trying to figure out, underneath the massive deluge of
data that's dumped on us, and education too, under the guise of education often
because even history changes all the time as well, you'll notice, that we all
ask the same questions of what's going on? Why does it go on? What really is
the system we're living in? …which goes through different periods of
transformation although it pretends it's not, and all the different techniques
and tricks that are used today to create the illusions of mass demands on
behalf of the public to change, really, the system according to a big, big
plan.
They've always said that the rich people rule the
world, and of course it's very true. Not just myself but many before me have talked
about that, all the way back and before even Aldous Huxley, that the dominant minority have always
existed and they always will, he presumed at the time during his
interview with Mike Wallace. Of
course, you have a much, much larger academia than ever before across the
planet all working together, different departments and so on, and communication
in a global system of Internet, etc., so they really do have tremendous power
and they work as the force that brings forth the changes. They
even raise the children according to what the need actually
is, isn't it? It's according to
the need of those who rule and manage the system. They raise the children to be
the advocates of whatever is needed 10 or 15 years down the road when they'll
bring in different things. That's actually how it is.
It's pretty efficient that way.
Over the last few weeks too I've talked about
articles by people like Jacques Ellul who talked about efficiency and how efficiency would be used to change and modify
the whole, all cultures, all systems, all thought forms basically that we are
so used to living in. They are already changing of course and have changed. So
basically efficiency and the drive for efficiency, naturally for those in
power, the real powers that run the system, overrides any human element, or
even catastrophe that is the fallout from their agendas. And they always have
lots of agendas of a course. Other
philosophers too have talked about necessity and how under the guise of necessity, which is often the excuse
that they'll settle on to make the public go along with something. They use
necessity… We have to do this to save you from a war,
or from yourselves and climate change, and yourselves and man-made global
warming and so on, anthropogenic warming.
So they've got it all figured out, and at least
hopefully there'll be a few folk down the road in the future who will at least know and they've lived through some of the changes, the
mandated changes, and they'll be able to maybe pass them on to some, to anyone
else who wants to know down the road. Because that's all you can do. A long time ago I said that there are so
many people turning to self-destructive behaviors because they can't find
purpose in a system that's fed them all the wrong reasons. You know it's fake and the reasons are wrong
for the way things are and the way they're going to go, etc. And you get
frustrated if you can't get into the old books, if they're still around that
is, to find out what really, really happened at different times, then you'll
never understand that the problem isn't yours. The problem is you suspect and probably know
certain things are all wrong, you just don't have all the information to put it
together to keep your sanity.
Because many people just don't swallow the
answers they're given. There are people
out there, the more psychopathic, more closer to...
And they'll say that everyone's got the psychopathic traits, they're like
exaggerations of different tendencies we have in a sense. But the more psychopathic
people will naturally gravitate and jump on the bandwagon and start parroting
all the nuances and politically correct messages that they're given. They
understand what they're for. They understand there's a system that now puts
this ahead of everything else and does away with even their opposites and
things like that. That's how fast things can be changed, but they'll
immediately jump on them. Just like
Orwell said that, you know, who are we
fighting today, in 1984. Because
they kept changing the target in a sense, but you're supposed to not notice
that they always change the target, even though you'll adjust your talk to the
new country or the new area that you're supposedly at war with. It's the same thing.
It's all well understood at a very high
level. Those who belong to the Marxist
groups, those who belong to the socialist revolutionary groups in the 1920s and
30s, like George Orwell, they understood that they were well trained. Where they fell out was when they realized
that the communistic system really was destroying or wanted to destroy any
competition. They didn't really want a parliamentary, you might call it a
parliamentary form of socialism. They wanted a more dictatorial form of
it. In fact, they didn't believe it
would work if you had different dissension groups within a governmental system.
That again was further explained by HG Wells.
Because he again was a founder of the Fabian Society with Bernard Shaw and
others who were quite open the fact that they had an open channel, physical channel, all the way to Moscow
to the Kremlin, and Trotsky was in touch with them all the time. Trotsky was
always saying to them, you know, your way
won't work, you've got to have an instant revolution. Whereas the Fabian
socialists wanted step-by-step change until you simply morph into the new
system. And that's really the perfect
technique because it's so perfected today you can morph into it within a matter
of a few years quite easily from one to the next, without really knowing that
you've actually changed [Alan chuckles.] and the
system has changed.
It really is wonderful to see it in fact, because
it's wonderful in that you understand the power, and the powers of those who've
studied us and who can then implement the techniques to make us think and work
and behave towards a certain goal or many goals. It is fascinating to watch it. And we truly are, we're living through
amazing times when everything that governments once stood for, supposedly stood
for at least [Alan chuckles.], have been turned on their heads and are upside
down. And now they're, with the same authoritarian techniques of putting it
across to the public, they're mandating that the public go along with, really,
contrary everything, systems, opinions, directions.
It's quite fascinating to just sit back as almost
like an alien being and watching it. And it helps to
an extent to understand what they talked about by alienation. Because in sociology and in socialism too and in
Marxism they talked about this term of alienation. I mentioned it to someone, and we were
talking about it the other day there, what they really meant by
alienation.
In the Marxian version it was that, basically
those in the lower orders, when studied in the 1800s and much before that too,
they literally, especially in the cities, they literally felt they were drifting. Because you're such a low class
of unimportance, that's how it was put across then, you really had no rights at
all. You might get casual labor, occasionally
if you're lucky. You had no healthcare of any kind. You had no welfare of any
kind. You were disposable by employers, literally, physically. Because I mean, people died of incredible
conditions in factories during the Industrial Revolution and things like that
crammed into terrible places. So that's
how great the nation was when it was empire in Britain, for instance. And we
forget, we're taught to forget it. We
come out with this mushy notion of old BBC plays and things where it's all carriages
and wealthy middle-class from London or something. That was not the country at all. And even in
London, there's a complete other side of that too.
But what I'm getting at is that we're so well
studied. Marx did it too. Because they all knew it. Remember, the whole idea of
Marxism was eventually revolution, and supposedly the workers at that time, they
always presumed they'd always be laborers and workers, that they would
supposedly, theoretically, ideally, utopically [Alan
chuckles.], run the nation and the world. Which never really emerged of course.
It was certainly used by others for their own advantage elsewhere, of course. But the idea, the symptoms they were
describing are dead on. Because those who lived in squalor, as they say,
because they worked it out in different categories, it's squalor that's the problem. Not squalor as a symptom of the poverty. Then the
frequent changes of employment, even, were often because they were getting
fired. Or if they were getting a bit older,
they'd get fired immediately. Because it's easier to carry someone who's cheap
and new and younger, you see. That's never going to change either by the
way. And on and on it goes.
So the alienation came because people literally
felt, with the conscious mind, you're adrift in the world to an extent. I
understand that, you can feel definitely adrift in the
world. And if you do understand, and I understood it when I was young going
through a lot of some of that too, just understanding what was happening, and
things did not make sense. Big, big moves were underfoot, were underway I
should say, big moves to change the whole system.
They brought in, they had to bring in actually,
because of promises to get folk into World War II and to fight again, since a
lot of the promises they'd promised in World War I were not fulfilled, and they
gave them a bit more Council housing, primarily Council housing for
working-class areas. Then they brought in eventually health care system. Which of course they were dismantling about
30 years later, [Alan laughing.] they
were dismantling it as well, and still dismantling it and changing it.
Whatever's done for any, under any pretext or any
legitimate reason, generally is altered again to suit, once again, efficiency
for those at the top. Years ago, years and years ago they had the big
discussions about the common market, they called this little meeting place
where they'd just meet and discuss things. Just like the United Nations
nonsense, same thing, it was always intended to be much, much bigger. But they
fooled the people. They lied to the people. They disclose the fact a few years
ago they'd lied to the people from the beginning because they couldn't handle
opposition and they’d never get their United Europe through if they did. So,
they lied and lied up to the bitter end.
But the public in Britain didn't know it. They
were not told. They were not to be told. They actually had that in the memos when they set it up, what its
real function was. But I can remember even the farmers who were told to borrow,
borrow, borrow, borrow, borrow, this European free trade deal would be such a
benefit because they could export even more stuff, etc. etc. And they got
loans. And the government encouraged it all, they got loans and put their farms
down as collateral. And when the EU came in with its big, big strong hand it
had already decided how much of a quota of milk and cheese and butter and so on
that you could sell and export. And it was actually cut way down. So farmers were
literally told what they could produce, what they couldn't produce. And so many of them went under.
You've heard this before, of course, or other
things since then when they did the same thing in other countries, including
North America. It's the same con that
goes on, borrow, borrow, borrow, big money, don't worry it will all get paid
back with these deals. And bingo, there you go.
You have literally faceless bureaucrats deciding how much you can
produce, who you can sell it to, etc. That's what happens. So there's not, there's no real freedom to
decide your future in certain areas, in all traditional areas, put it that way.
With mass unemployment in the West, and again,
back to Margaret Thatcher's day and era in the late
70s and into the 80s, she said, get used to it, there would be unemployment, get used to it… To the youth, she
says, and, some
of them will never see work in their lifetime, a whole generation, she
said. Well, that, you understand, they can actually write
off all the teenagers who were alive at the time of that speech, and people
even younger than that, completely written off.
From a system that wanted you to vote for them. And the system that want you to trust them
and so on. What an incredible…
But mind you, the techniques of controlling the
emotion are so well understood, including anger. She did away with all the old
pub licensing hours, for instance, to keep them open all day, etc. And she
said, it's better to have the youngsters
spending their unemployment or welfare money in the pubs getting drunk then
having them protesting on the streets.
Which of course, and they'd have to be kind of sober for that one, so. They did that kind of thing. And of course,
they deluged the media in movies and that, you got lots of sex and all these
different places. Sex and drugs of some
kind or another, you see. Alcohol is a drug actually. That
was to keep folk from demanding a say in the future of... of their own future, actually.
Now, I really don't think it would have mattered
which party was in, personally. I really don't.
Because you always find the same agendas go on and on and on. The same
thing happened in the US. Same thing
happened even when Cameron was Prime Minister of Britain. I mean, folks from outside and inside the
country didn't know his policies were the same as the far left Labour and
liberal. They all have the same agendas.
They all have the same the same agendas
because they have to have the same agendas. They are
obviously going to fulfill the mandated agendas, cultural, every way,
financial, you name it. They all do the same thing and that's the bottom line.
The bottom line is, that's what Carol Quigley said too, eventually all the parties will say the same things and strive for
the same things. Because they're all being backed by the same rich rich
men of the planet basically.
It's the same with, you think of the old Marxist
ideas, and communist ideas, and socialist ideas when they talked about the
means of production. Well, our own governments, if you can even call them our
own governments, really, you know. But the governments all agreed in the West
through some strange, we know what it was too, what groups they belong to, and
the big movements that back them up and decide things and plan things for them,
the think tanks and so on, they know what the agenda was. So they all went for
deindustrialization and giving most of the production over to China. And they did it so slickly. I remember living
through it, watching it happen. What got me, in Canada they played it very
well, low-key. Folk almost didn't comment on the fact everything was coming,
the same things were coming in, the same names and logos on things they were
purchasing, but they would say in small print, made in China. You see.
Of course, India now has got big money flowing
into it from the World Bank, etc., which we all pay into, to get them really highly developed in industry. And no one complains
about other countries coming up. But the fact is, what was given for the West
to replace their employment? And it's a
real puzzle to me, honestly, as to how, especially young people, are managing.
Certain groups went into technology, might be doing awfully well, 'eh. But not
everyone is cut out for that kind of work. And we don't have all the factories
we used to have where they could lose themselves in manufacturing and creating
objects and things and repairing and fixing, are pretty well
all gone. And lots of people really
enjoyed that. And they had a good employment from it.
So there’s nothing really was put out to replace
it. So I really would love to have the government studies on [Alan chuckles.],
real percentages of the youth into adulthood and the statistics to see who's
working at what and the different percentages, etc. How many are still living with their parents,
into the age of 40 or more even in fact, some of them. Or a parent, in fact,
single-parent families too to see how they can survive. Because none of them,
or very few of them will be able to actually own their
own home down the road. Or even today.
Because for most folk now, in this global system,
the price of real estate has just gone beyond, around the, it's out to outer
space and around the moon and back a few times, I think. It makes no sense to
do with reality. But because there are so many people who are now billionaires
and trillionaire's at the top, then they decide what the policies and prices
are going to be on pretty well all the things,
especially things like real estate. Some countries are basically, almost,
they're churning out like machines these multimillionaires and billionaires and
so on and no one can compete with it even to buy the homes. But then that, again that ties in with the
future of a world where you simply won't have private property, for the majority of the public.
An elite will have. And it will
be accepted.
Interestingly
enough too, I was thinking, through all of this, about
those who see certain things often in their own time and put it across in some
way or another that you can actually analyze it and see how much they knew, or
what they'd picked up on. And I was thinking about, there's an awfully good
writer who worked for television in Britain. He's a journalist as well as a
fiction writer. He's called Dennis Potter. He died about 1994. But he'd lived
from the 30s right through the 1994. He was in on the writing game early, as
they say, especially with the BBC and so on and he bemoaned the change in the
BBC for... what he was literally… when
the BBC was promoting promiscuity in the 60s.
Now these are, everybody in the BBC at that time
had come from Oxford and Eaton, right. That was pretty well,
you couldn't get in and work there unless you did, for most places. So they
were a government run agency that worked on behalf of the government. It
promoted the Cold War naturally for MI5 and MI6 to keep us all in the state of,
well, you know. Because we tend to forget. I mean, you wouldn't even know the
war, a Cold War was going on except declarations that you were so poor. Because you were paying off debt from World
War I and II, and plus added money we were borrowing to pay for new defense
systems for the Cold War. This is how you’re kept under, there is no extra cash,
in those days, really, to me.
But they gave you, again, the BBC, it was pop,
they call it pop music. And drugs suddenly became available everywhere, you
know, LSD, everything, you name it. And
these were not getting made, LSD, by little science guys in the basement. [Alan chuckles.] That's another story. However, they gave you
the pop music, drugs and sex, you see. And about the
mid-60s or so, or the late 60s early 70s they came out with the pill, I think
it was the 60s anyway, but the National Health Service could. So really, that's a great way to divert your
attention from your future. All you’re
thinking about is what you want at that moment, and it might not be that good
for you. [Alan chuckles.] But the
thing is, youngsters always go for the same things, same temptations and so on
when it's put right in front of them. But it took them away from the old staid
system of getting married, a lot of them anyway, and having children, and
continuing. They want to break the continuity of the old system, that was the
whole point of it.
So the BBC promoted it. They got the guys on who
were interviewed, stoned out of their heads on live interviews. And it was like a tee-hee laughing matter, as
opposed to, isn't that terrible, do you want your children to emulate these
characters? I mean it really was, some of them were falling off their seats,
for goodness’ sake and talking gibberish. They were so out of it with heavy
drugs. But that's what was promoted. At
the time too they even put a lot of movies out by the British, they still had a
kind of movie system for making movies. And they were ahead of the US with
nudity and so on. So that's what they
give you in terms of poverty and transition, and the transition is not going to
bring you more money [Alan chuckles.], just more poverty in a sense, and debt
of course. But it's a great distraction.
Also, aiming towards the children trying to say, you're part of something. There was a revolution they were
pushing. Now, here's your governments pushing this cultural revolution during
this time period and Dennis Potter who was an icon
with the BBC for a while for his awfully good productions, different, novel way
of putting different ideas across, he got knocked a few times when he went into
a form of, what they claimed was an obnoxious way of putting the sexual content
across. He himself apparently was sexually abused when he was about 10 years
old by someone he knew, and maybe this had a lot of impact on him. It actually did have a lot of impact in his life. I think in
some interviews he actually admitted the horrible
effects it has from childhood on for the rest of your life. So, he was putting this seedy side of human
nature in his movie system too.
But he also went through vast changes. His dad
was a miner, he saw the vast changes in the system. He saw the unemployment
right through the 60s, 70s into the 80s. He was acutely aware of what was going
on too. But he put some good movies out there, television movies, and one was
called Blade on the Feather, about
the recruitment of the big spy rings from, they were taken from Oxford and
Cambridge. Very good, because he had a lot of contacts obviously in the right
places. If you listen closely to that one, if you get it, listen to the little
quips in it, they're awfully, awfully telling of the system at the time. And the pretense of who's who, are they
really who you think they are, in any position of power, especially
politics. He also did interviews when he
was dying, just before he died actually in 1994. He
did an interview live and was quite frank about the
system. He even called his tumor,
cancerous tumor, Rupert, after Rupert Murdoch, whom he hated and loathed for,
he called it, for destroying and creating a new trashy journalism style for the
media, that persists to this day obviously.
He definitely put a lot
of things across about the system in almost a covert way, about the seedy side
of human nature, and also the truthful side of those, of daydreams mixed with
the seedy side of life too which come into it. Because we're, he always said
that we're made of opposites basically, that life is opposites. And that
Angels, remember too, have opposites tendencies, including Lucifer, for
instance, was an angel of light, hm. So,
you have opposites in life and there's opposites within humans.
He definitely was rather
angry at the destruction of what was called the British press at one time that
was, maybe had more ability to say things than later on. And definitely
they don't have it now. They don't even attempt to have it now. You have
opinion pieces in a lighthearted kind of jocular vein and that's as far as they
go. And that's not really news. But it's
safe, isn't it.
Now, in the last few weeks of his life, really,
he hurried to complete another, his last two plays basically, or movies you
might call them. Karaoke was one, which has a lot of himself in it as a writer as
the character with the cancer and what happened. In a very clever way he put
into it, the death of the character has to be tied in
with cryogenics. That led to the next and the last one he wrote. And he said he
wanted people to understand and to get more from his work than just enjoyment
and pleasure, etc. He put so much in,
ha, to the final one which was called Cold
Lazarus. It was to do with the head
of the writer that had been frozen for many, many, many centuries and then they
managed to tap into it eventually, stir memories and so on, from the
scientists. But the future he put into it, in the 90s when he wrote that, was
where we're going.
He had a world system of the top, almost like
star quality CEOs and owners of massive international corporations, living in a
life of luxury, which is into the sci-fi realm, you see. Literally. They have
the group of scientists working on the head, getting a grant to work on the
head, by a woman who owns probably trillions of pounds worth at that time of
businesses across the world and investments.
So everybody who works, and even if they have degrees and scientists and
so on, they still have to work for these very powerful
calloused, because as time goes on you lose your old civility in the system
where money/power is rather blatant. All the niceties are out the window now,
they're incredibly nasty to people if you're employed by them. It definitely is the
real class system that's come, that's pretty well here actually, where they
create heroes for you to follow that are really just businesspeople, who's
often for the businesses are heavily funded with the public-private partnership
deal. Because that went through worldwide at the same time from the big
institutions. Because what they claimed at the time, again through necessity or
efficiency, we've got a have the taxpayers’ money for these massive projects.
But in the future in Cold Lazarus everybody works for these incredible magnets. They
also have superstar wealthy people who are superstars because they simply,
because they are wealthy, incredibly wealthy in what they own, holding
companies across the planet, etc. There's no nations
as far as I can tell anymore, they have quaint names for regions and that's
about it. You'll find too that it's a
world where everything's monitored. Remember, this is before 2001. Everything
is monitored. All calls. Cameras everywhere. Very Orwellian too of course. And
nothing is missed, everything is kept that's transmitted by any kind of
electronic means at all, forever. And this is, again, before much of the things
that have happened in the West.
The police/military group are all clad in black,
naturally, and they’re armed to the teeth. They're everywhere in the streets
and so on and outside apartment buildings where folk have to
rent, etc. They've got heavy, heavy armor on themselves too. The cars that you
see in it are driverless. They're kind of hovercraft, they don't go very high,
just maybe a foot or two off the ground.
They're electric in some way or another.
Also they have, there's no driver in them, so driverless cars,
automatic. You can't own them, although the ultra wealthy elites can own cars. But the people just have to
call up like, almost like a taxi thing that comes to your door. But everyone's
got a number and everything you do is a purchase by that number. An order for a
taxi, everything goes down as your... So they've got a complete record of where
you went, why you went there, etc. etc. etc. Everything is pretty
well there.
Potter I think
knew a lot more [Alan chuckles.] than
you would imagine. Because he got it pretty well spot on, even people who run a global
entertainment business, and you know, huge consortiums of TV channels across
the planet and so on, are superstars just by the fact that they own it all. So
he got it all pretty well down pat, it really is. And the cultural changes too, it's all done
there.
We're living through a planned agenda,
obviously. Your rights get stripped away
under the guise of necessity because you see, there's all these terrible things
going on in the world, so everyone has to be
monitored. Because you can't trust yourself anymore. They've got to keep tabs on everything that's
happening. Understand, under a tyranny,
any kind of tyranny, those at the top, no matter what they call it, they can
call it utopia, or heaven even, you know, under any kind of tyranny they're
always going to try and keep you safe and they do it by using necessity for having to know what
everyone's doing or thinking in order to keep you safe.
That's the excuse, you see. Well, you wouldn't want to be unsafe, would
you? ...so we've got to tap in and see what you're thinking. Do you know, I looked at this week in fact, I
think Google, it's Google or some other group out there are actually
going forward. And it's funny, I was just talking last week to someone
on this thing too. They're going to the next step too, they want to literally
have, to tap into your mind, your brain. Now, that's an old idea. Once in a while they
float old ideas again as they go through more experimentation. They're always experimenting, naturally. But
they want to intersect with your mind, even without a chip in your head, if
possible. Although that might come, it may be more efficient. Again, under the
guise of efficiency, right. There you go.
And with the incredible power around any, the
computer, especially even the monitor, you'll find it will knock regular a.m.
stations of the airwaves if you put a radio near it. That's the power it gives
off. And it's not really safe. I personally don't like
sitting within that field, I'd rather get as far back as possible. Because it's
not safe. I mean, electromagnetic waves, these are very powerful waves,
affect the cells in your body. We know this. This is not disputed. What they dispute is
how severe it is and, you know, that's what they dispute.
But yeah, I mean a few years back too, remember
in the airports they had little documentaries put out there, articles in
newspapers about throwing grants...
again... You see, whatever is used for necessity, or even terrorism, is
great for big business. They had articles in the 90s, in the 1990s that, what
are the companies going to do that create all the war industry if there's
peace? This is mainstream general big
newspapers across the world. What are they going to do, it was a massive income
and so on. Well, they said that they were going into surveillance and security
systems. And that's exactly what they did.
Well, now they're getting the Cold War revived so they can have it both
ways. It's so lucrative that you can't give it up, you see. So you couldn’t not have a peaceful world and
have all these institutions continue, and being so strong and powerful as they
are.
And money is powerful. The big billionaires,
trillionaire's, and there's trillionaires in the world, there are. They have a
lot of clout, an awful lot of clout in society and when politicians are backed
and given massive funding from different ones, they are naturally obliged to
listen to the funders before they listen to the people who supposedly elect
them. Naturally, that's the way it is.
We've got to break out of the shell of pretense
that everything is wonderful and everyone out there is honest about it and so
on, right. For those at the top to
feel safe they must have the data on every single person in real time, by
the minute, by the hour, by the day. That's how you stay safe. Because they'd
really, I don't think… Power never trusts the general population, it never
does. It never has. It never has done. You find from the days of Walsingham and the spy industry from Queen Elizabeth 1st
time, they had spies all through Britain, paid full-time spies. Thousands of
them checking up, and ones even going through places like Scotland taking a
form of census on the population, their health, their manpower strength, even
the health of their horses and stuff like that. Quite amazing stuff. Defoe was
part of that too later on, you know, that's one of the
jobs that he did going through Scotland.
So anyway, that's always been the way. And of course, spies too were
literally, during Queen Elizabeth the 1st reign and afterwards,
they'd watch for Catholics, you know, they'd watch for Catholics. And when priests were forbidden, Catholic
priests, they hung them if they found them in the streets. And spies everywhere. I mean, you've got
understand that, as I say, history is a horror show, really. It really is. I
really don't expect it to be, I mean, you can get…
Today we're so calmed down with a more perfect
way of governing us, that they can do it so well without overt force, all of the time. All of the time. It's almost like stroking your mind, 'eh,
with, oh, this is okay, look at the
happy little bits of these stories you get everywhere, you open them up and all
the cat and dog stories and stuff like that, wonderful little things. But you
aren't going to get told anything that really matters. News has changed, really
changed, in the last 20 years especially, I'd say. And before that too,
according to Potter. But in the last 20
years it's definitely changed big time. And people
want their paychecks, Potter mentioned that too in a big, big talk that he gave
at MacTaggart Center to other journalists, about the fact that they were all pretty well, they’re the propagandists, the journalists are
the propagandists for the rich and wealthy.
But for those, as I say, that want to understand
it, at least a bit of what happened in the past, and how the best of intentions
can get used as well, to get the people to go along, there are always those who
see incredible profits in times of crisis.
I always think of the Council on Foreign Relations. I can't remember which one it was... was it's, Hart, was it Gary Hart at the time,
or... who came out in the newspapers and I think at
the time of 9/11, 2001, and he said, how
can we use, and it's a favorites thing they say, how can we use this crisis to our advantage. He was talking about their global agenda, for
instance, and that's what they mean, to our
advantage. He wasn't talking [Alan chuckles.] to the general
public. To our advantage. And
you've heard it since then by top business people and
so on, how can we use this crisis to our
advantage, and, why let a good crisis
go to waste and so on. It's even in the movies now that kind of thing.
Because that's the way it really is, isn't it. That's how it really is. So the whole idea that they've settled on,
united with the mantra of global warming then turning into climate change, and as
the Club of Rome said, famine, plague,
desertification, all that kind of stuff,
droughts, meaning overpopulation, that's what they really mean by it, that would fit the bill, man was the enemy. So, we've got a war on humanity itself. There's too many of us. We're all consuming. We are the enemy of the
planet, we’re the enemy of those who control it all, so we've got to stop them,
be ruled by those who are... who will rule us from birth to death.
Down the road it will happen, you’ll go into the
state where they'll decide, they're already talking about it again, but they
always float the same ideas in top sources in universities and professors and
all that, who all belong to, again, the big global CFR type system, and they
say, well, you know, we should really have people licensed to have children. Then they'll say... And lots of folk will agree with them because
there's an awful lot of terrible parents out there and horrible parents and so
on. But you can't take the complete rights from the people under the guise of
the minority do it. You can't do that.
It's too easy to demand the wrong things or demand what controllers want
you to demand. To your detriment, really, if you look at what the controllers
are doing to even children and what they're indoctrinating them with at the moment, by law. [Alan chuckles.] You can't keep falling for the same reasons
that they give you.
But they also have said that eventually, I
remember reading about in the future... Because way back in the late 60s they
had articles in the newspaper about the coming utopia. I'm not kidding
you. They had the big global meeting,
the Council on Foreign Relations/Royal Institute of International Affairs held
in Britain, when they even decided what countries would be basically tourist
countries, like Scotland, they were going to turn it into a tourist country, it
would be totally deindustrialized. Well, they did that, that's true enough. And
other countries too. Nothing was put to the vote for the public. These are
private institutions that run the world.
They are the establishment, on behalf of the ones who own it all.
But anyway, they also said that, yeah, and they
had drawings of people in togas, Roman togas, where they'd have conquered the
climate and they could create climate, and you'd all walk about in these Roman
togas and sandals on your feet. All your needs would be given to you, and
managed, because everything would be so automated, etc. And those that needed,
humans that needed to give employment
will rotate, they'll rotates a certain class at the top who would volunteer to
work, and it would be a privilege to be accepted to volunteer to work for the
system, this global system, as they walked about in Roman togas. Which must
mean in Canada and some other countries they've eliminated mosquitoes, I'd
suppose.
But anyway, this is what they floated around, and
they were telling folk how wonderful it was going to be. Then when they totally deindustrialized and
they cemented the European Union and did their quota system on production of
even dairy products and food, and decided who is going to import what from
whom, and they cut out all the mutton and so on from New Zealand and Australia,
things like that, and then they dumped stacks of butter and dairy from France
onto Britain, put other folk under. This
is their utopia.
You understand, they give you such incredible
lies. Remember, the communist revolution was going to bring in utopia, that was
the idea. And under the guise of
bringing it all in, you would have a system of giant giant supermarkets, like
we have today, where you can get everything, BuildAll
center types, you get all your, what you need for hardware, everything. But
people would go in and with a cashless society, they wouldn't even eventually
need cash, you might get credits, you see, and tokens given to you, like
Russell said. But you'd only get, take, they would have no staff there, you'd
pick up what you wanted, automatically it'd be I guess check out or whatever.
But the people would be so well-trained and decent that they would only take
what they needed, not any extra. That was their incredible utopia.
Well, in that case you're going to be talking
about changing the choices of humans. Because even the bad choices come from a
human trait, and many traits actually, even survival.
People often will shoplift because they're terrified of whatever. There's a good
documentary up there of a woman who was, one of many women that were sent off
to the terrible Soviet gulags in Siberia.
Awful stories, incredible stories of them. And when they come out,
they're alive some of them, and they were alive then anyway back in the 90s,
maybe or 80s. One of them, literally, she showed you
her house. Big big
trays, baker's trays of loafs of bread. She said, I can't eat them, she says,
but I can't stop myself from ordering them. The fear of the starvation she went
through is horrifying to her. That will never change.
There are many traits that are just natural
traits that become exacerbated and amplified. But terrible Pavlovian situations
and reflexes, as she's got now, she just can't stop, you see. What a horrible,
horrible outcome. That was their utopia, you see. And if you disagreed with their utopia you
were put in the mental hospital. Because you had to be mentally ill to
criticize the Soviet system, that was what they diagnosed you with. Since it was a perfect system, right, so you
obviously, you're psychotic.
I see unfortunately the same techniques being
rolled out under a thousand different guises throughout society with what's now
called politically correct mandates, and as Orwell had, thought crime and all
that kind of stuff. Tyranny
really is fairly continuous. There's different
strengths of it for different periods, but it's the same techniques that are
always used to silence people. Because Tyranny does not like something
that's so important, and that is the ability to speak. Whether you like it
or not, you have to have the ability, it doesn't
matter if a person is stone crazy, the fact is, they've got the right to speak.
Because after all, it's someone else, someone's deciding he is stone crazy, right. But he’s still
got the right to speak. Or she, it depends, you know.
But the thing is, tyranny always silences it,
under guises that they're mentally ill or whatever it happens to be. And don't believe the same tyrannies, that
back in the 80s and 70s started dismantling all the psychiatric hospitals
across the Western world, at the same time, by the way, and in the States as
well, and putting them out on the street. They really care, 'eh? [Alan chuckles.] You'd better start thinking here, hm.
The old saying, if it walks like a duck and
quacks like a duck, it's probably a duck. So, you see the same symptoms arise
in society, it doesn't bode well. When you see well-trained massive mobs, well
organized mobs being allowed loose on streets by your governments, this isn't
spontaneous, this isn't just a happenstance flash mob, spontaneous. These are,
this is obviously authorized to get something else through. Even the clashes they're creating everywhere
in the world. And I really think there'll be a lot more to come. I really do.
Because I can't believe in this age that
governments are going to stand back and just let it happen. They're getting
something out of it. It's a mandate down the road. And I mean, all kinds of
them too. I mean, there's even ones now that are attacking farms in different
countries. And now they've got an international, they want international groups
to do it all in the same day, etc. As an example. What you're seeing, getting back to the
Soviet system, when there's no tolerance, you've got an intolerant
society. And when it's mandated, things
are mandated by law, then your governments are obviously intolerant. How can
you be Democratic? How can they be? They
can't be. They're one or the other, which one, which is it?
The whole idea of democracy is something balances
the other. That's why they had the idea of extremes in government parties. Well
they don't, they're all the same pretty well, aren't
they? And it's a dangerous situation.
Eventually they hope to wither away the governments, as the state would wither
way according to Marx, you know. And we
all accept this form of being governed, or really, ruled. And even though we're ruled at the moment by forces unseen, and massive think tanks
across the world that work privately and dictate to governments with the same,
because governments certainly use them all the time, we don't vote them in,
then we are run by a very mysterious system at the moment, aren't we.
So as I say, I hope down the road that even the
newcomers will stop blaming themselves for everything they think is wrong in
their life. I do understand what they
mean by alienation for a lot of folk who feel it. They feel despondent. They
feel they don't fit in. There's no
purpose down the road for them. And believe you me, there's reasons why you're
like that. And very possibly, just informing yourself of the past and getting
into the societies that we really live in, and the systems that control
everything, it's very, it's all out there actually if you want to dig for it.
There's no conspiracy stuff involved.
Because the big think tanks publish so much of
this stuff themselves, and universities that work with them publish a lot of
articles about how control is used for what they call peace, etc. It's awfully interesting too that even, and I
always remember the old saying that the Soviets said, that their struggle would be over when there's
peace. Because they kept pushing peace and it got awfully hard for the
West to, young folk in the West, they say, well, they want peace for goodness’
sake, you know. But no one thought to... You see, definitions are so important.
And what they said was, peace, when they really, really pushed, peace is the absence of all opposition.
That's what they meant.
Khrushchev said something similar too in his
talk, I think it was in the US in the 1960s. He said that,
you're all worried about something you
shouldn't be worried about. He says,
your children will all grow up in a socialist, he's talking about a
Soviet type socialist system, and it will all be quite natural to them. But they'll do it without struggle. They'll do
it without any terrible, terrible consequences. He says, they'll grow up in it, naturally, never
knowing that it was literally designed for them to do so. That ties in
with the Reese Commission, and that's another story again.
However, I've prattled on long enough tonight. I
didn't even mean to go this far. I meant to just touch on Dennis Potter's Karaoke. It's entertaining. It has the
system inside of it, and it has his own story inside the story, as he's got cancer,
he's actually in a sense like the character in it. And
then Cold Lazarus with the future.
That's even for the budgets of the day they did pretty well
I would say in showing you a future that's still, it's more apparent now than
it was even then.
So before I just sign off here, I'll put up some
articles that will tie in with what's current. Because it's hard to find
current stuff now. It's all, there's very little real news anymore, it truly
isn't, you know. Things that are
important we're not really told about, that way
agendas can go forward from government and we're simply oblivious of them. But there's one here, I've mentioned it
before, about the freedom of the press.
Awfully good.
George Orwell - The Freedom of the Press - Orwell's Proposed Preface to
‘Animal Farm’
orwell.ru
Orwell explains once again, I'm going to put that
up, he explains why you must have different opinions about everything. You must
have it. If you give in under one topic,
you'll give up with all the rest of them too. And you won't like it down the
road.
Also, got new taxes, new tax, bad news for those
on the land and so on. We're getting all
the carbon taxes coming down.
Federal carbon tax starts in four provinces - winnipegsun.com / 31 March 2019
‘It’s no longer free to pollute’: Canada imposes carbon tax on four provinces - theguardian.com / 1 April 2019
Also…
Mark Zuckerberg (Alan: They've used him, of course) asks governments to help control internet content - bbc.com / 30 March 2019
Isn’t that interesting, hey. [Alan chuckles.] So I mean, the guy who said, you're all stupid f'ers,
he said, you know, is now saying the government has to
come into it and help controlling it. There you go. It's… And I understand a
lot of the stuff, folk can't even be decent on the Internet. But then again,
you don't know what the bots are, and there's government agencies got stacks of
bots they can turn loose on anybody, that they'll put out the real hate stuff
and hate speech and all that. Of course they do. There's nothing, you don't know where any
stuff is coming from that you read.
And then…
US military to develop genetically modified plants (A:
...like green plants, right, like vegetable type plants...) to spy in environments ‘unsuitable for
traditional sensors’
independent.co.uk / 23 Nov 2017
New synthetic biology programme makes use of natural capabilities to gather intelligence
One day, like Prince Charles who talked about
talking to his plants, you know, they'll start talking back to you.
Also too, again, how they keep changing names
when the public start to catch on to the news, in their conversations, like
NAFTA, North American Free Trade Agreement, and all the terrible things to do
with it, and so they changed it to USMCA, which is more of a mouthful. But it's really just
NAFTA rebooted. But also, the TransPacific Partnership deals too that everybody
was complaining about at the time, are all incorporated apparently into this
new USMCA. I’ll put that article up if anyone really cares to know about it and
so on and check it out for themselves. You've got to find out for
yourselves.
I haven't gone through it all to see, but that
wouldn't surprise me at all. Because they already did the free trade things for
the Pacific Rim negotiations, separately as well, they had already signed these
things in. And the public were
completely oblivious, or ignorant of what they are, aren't we? And do you have time to read thousands of
pages of things? Of course you don't. Neither do the politicians, they don't
read them either. They don't. I mean, that's not being facetious, it's
true.
USMCA: A NAFTA Reboot? - thenewamerican.com / 3 Oct 2018
And then another one too, this one here on France cited as a source of largest number
of wealthy migrants coming in, I think, or coming and going actually. And
Canada, it says…
Estimated 8,000 millionaires immigrated to Canada last year, report says
France cited as source of largest number of wealthy migrants
cbc.ca / 23 Feb 2017
Canada attracted just under 10 per cent of the estimated 82,000 millionaire migrants who changed country last year, according to a recent report.
(A: It's a breakdown into the
wealthiest, well, the countries where they're moving to, mainly for safety and
so on, you know. It says…)
New World Wealth said the inflows into Canada were boosted by large-scale migration from China into Vancouver, and from Europe into Toronto and Montreal.
Canada the second most popular destination for wealthy Chinese emigrants
A South Africa-based market research group, New World Wealth said the overall number of millionaires on the move last year around the world rose to 82,000 from 64,000 in 2015.
(A: Now, what they claim here is…)
Improved education and higher personal safety were the main drivers when those wealthy people sought out a new destination, Andrew Amoils, head of research at New World Wealth, told CNBC.
So that makes sense too, they want to get into
the US, the big Ivy League universities they want to get into, that stick with
them for life. They'll meet the people
they'll work with down through life as CEOs of corporations, and
government. Like Maggie Thatcher said
too herself, with Britain when she started to use the taxpayer’s money to fund
the private schools and universities and so on, and university system. The class system is alive and well and
believe you me, class doesn't care where you come from as long as you've got
the money. And you can learn, you delve
into this new, I think Jacques Attali called them, the new nomads, they go
across the world, and where the money is is where they go. And they'll move
again if they need to. That's how it's
to be for the future, nomadic life existence.
Australia has the fastest growing number of millionaires on the planet – and you'll never believe the countries we beat. - Dailymail.co.uk / 29 Sept 2017
It's interesting, this all comes out at the same
time. It may put a different spin on
different things, they may come in with lots of money, but will they benefit
you? And I very much kind of doubt
it. Most of these big wealthy people
have international investments in the same stock markets and stuff like that,
you know. So it's just the way it is.
Also, I'll put these articles up regardless
anyway. But let me see now, oh yeah, the carbon taxes. A whole bunch on carbon
taxes. Again, the private organizations,
the think tanks, even some of them labeled as charities are driving and pushing
it all. A lot of Washington DC based
conservative think tanks that are charities, or labeled as charities, are
promoting the carbon trading schemes and so on. Years ago I gave talks, because
I listed all the companies, international companies that were all for bringing
in carbon taxes. And you're thinking, oh my goodness, it's going to cut back
on… No, they're not. They're going to make a fortune off of
it because they trade the carbon, it's like a stock market. They were all for
it. Because again, how can they let
this crisis go to waste, you see. So you create the appearance of a crisis,
then you get the public to fund the beginnings of the kind of carbon credits to
trade with – we did, I read the articles at the time – and then they get them
for nothing and start trading with them. And they can get billions off of it.
Well, what a… We just... We don't… We're
not… You either have that gift of
following that kind of technique or you don't. I, when it comes to money, I
just don't understand it at all. Honestly, I have no interest in this or that
or investments or how things are done. To me, it goes over my head, I kind of
shut down for it. Since school I've done that pretty well
when it comes to numbers. But the ones
who have the abilities to catch this stuff, they can
make fortunes. And they do, naturally.
And...
AEI Holds Carbon Tax Love-In - globalwarming.org / 24 April 2015
This is one of them. The American Enterprise
Institute. It's amazing, that's labeled as a kind of a charity and all that,
and a think tank. They're really pushing it. It's big money for corporations.
Obviously.
A carbon tax AEI? Really?!? - cfact.org / 6 Sept 2018
…is another one.
And…
The Philanthropists Who Think a Carbon Tax Offers the Best Way Forward on Climate Policy - insidephilanthropy.com
…you know.
And they can certainly pay all these big, big characters to put things
in the, and the media is quite happy, they'll put anything in if they're
getting paid to do it, especially these days, you know, newspapers. And then…
Mike Cannon-Brookes, Atlassian billionaire, calls on Government to reinstate carbon price - abc.net.au / 7 Nov 2018
Naturally, you know. So we’re all going to pay through the nose
for something that was dreamed up a long time ago. At the same time as they
dreamed up the whole idea of blaming us as being the problem, too many of you. And they're going to get awfully even more
rich from it, from their carbon exchanges. Remember that Al Gore was involved
with literally “Blood and Gore Carbon Exchange” to begin with, 'eh. [Alan laughing.] So he got all lot to win from pushing it all.
Anyway, I'll put these articles up for those who
care about it or are vaguely interested. We’re all going to pay regardless.
Nothing's going to change it. And then
getting back to...
Lock your gates, install CCTV and vet new staff carefully: The advice to farmers ahead of ‘major animal activist event’ by militant vegan groups - dailymail.co.uk / 4 April 2019
Now, where
do you think they all came from? And why do you think governments are allowing
it all to happen? Hm? Huh? Come on!
It was also
floated that, in an article in the British papers...
Ecuador’s UK ambassador REJECTS Wikileaks’ claims that Julian Assange is about to be expelled from its London embassy and arrested following deal with Britain – despite armed police surrounding the building - dailymail.co.uk / 4 April 2019
So we'll have to wait and see what's going on there. I don't know if
it's just to keep his name in the paper. Because it's true enough, when the
limelight is off is when the wolves... And the wolves have plenty of time, they
can wait. Just like they always say,
tribute to the devil, time is on their
side. They wait and wait and then they pick you off when they think no
one's looking. And it's true, every
regime has done that. And they will
always do that, I suppose.
And also…
Floating city dubbed Oceanix (A:
This is where your research and development money goes
from the taxpayer.) will save
coastal cities from flooding caused by climate change, UN project claims
dailymail.co.uk / 4 April 2019
•A UN department for sustainable development teamed up with Oceanix, MIT and the explorers club
•The partnership plans to build a prototype that will be open to visits by members of the public within months
And that will be the multi billionaires [Alan chuckles.] that we’re reading about here because they'll
end up getting investments in it.
They'll get backed at least dollar for dollar by the governments using
tax money and so on. Interesting, hey, how things go.
But believe you me, you're never going to have a static system, that's
what people think, often wish they had, a static system. They even had articles out many, many, many
years ago about, stop it, stop it, you're
changing too quickly. You don't have time to catch your breath, things
just, even buildings that your parents could refer to are no longer standing,
they just knock them down in no time. So you can't even relate to people that
are just a few years older than you. Everybody, again, this idea of alienation,
hm, it's all part of a technique too. Sad.
Middle-aged treated like 'second class citizens' - telegraph.co.uk / 4 April 2019
We're given no choice in the things and no say in anything either. As
I say, at least you have the supposed, supposed system of a democracy where
opposing viewpoints are supposed to be discussed. Believe you me, if you don't,
if you don't have that you're, the elite themselves will bring you into the Cold Lazarus system in no time at all,
with no opposition. Then you can never
go back to having a say in anything, or even a pretended say in anything, or
even some other people that you vote into speak for you, it won't happen.
The public are a nuisance, an awful nuisance to those who want to rule
and promote and guide the world. That's why it's far easier to go this way, ween
you off of even the involvement in what they're up to
and getting you used to being simply governed, until you stop asking questions
or even asking who's governing you, you see.
Then they can get things really done quickly. And that's the agenda
folks. That's what it's about.
Anyway, sorry for prattling on. As I say, I was only going to spend 10
minutes on just what I've said here. But I think it's important because I think
time is running out. And I feel it in
the air. I feel it. I feel there's big big changes happening. There's definitely
something. It's almost like a
switch being pulled or switched on or off or whatever, but as you go into this
new system of more intolerance. And it's
rather sad that. I don't think it bodes
well at all.
But that's the way it is, folks. So, I hope you get something out of
it. I hope a lot of the young people get something out of it too and realize
that life is not just fun and games and the occult. The occult just simply means ‘hidden’,
remember. We truly are in a sense in an occultic system, most of what the public
thinks that they should know is, they don't know at all, they're not
given. Secrecy rules and governments of
course say that they must run things in secrecy or
they’d get nothing done at all. There's a partial truth there too, you'd always
have so many objections, nothing would get done or fixed, the roads or
whatever, that kind of thing. But it goes too far when folk get off of what the rules are, you know, or they throw the
rulebook out the window, which is a terrifying thing to contemplate.
So for myself from a still really end of winter, there's a thaw going
on but a lot of snow to move yet and get down before the grass shows here, for
myself, Alan Watt from Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your God or
your gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Mark Zuckerberg asks governments to help control internet content
bbc.com / 30 March 2019
US military to develop genetically modified plants to spy in
environments ‘unsuitable for traditional sensors’
independent.co.uk / 23 Nov 2017
USMCA: A NAFTA Reboot?
thenewamerican.com / 3 Oct 2018
Estimated 8,000 millionaires immigrated to Canada last year, report says
cbc.ca / 23 Feb 2017
AEI Holds Carbon Tax Love-In
globalwarming.org / 24 April 2015
A carbon tax AEI? Really?!?
cfact.org / 6 Sept 2018
The Philanthropists Who Think a Carbon Tax Offers the Best Way Forward
on Climate Policy
insidephilanthropy.com
Mike Cannon-Brookes, Atlassian billionaire, calls on Government to
reinstate carbon price
abc.net.au / 7 Nov 2018
Federal carbon tax starts in four provinces
winnipegsun.com / 31 March 2019
‘It’s no longer free to pollute’: Canada imposes carbon tax on four provinces
theguardian.com / 1 April 2019
Lock your gates, install CCTV and vet new staff carefully: The advice
to farmers ahead of ‘major animal activist event’ by militant vegan groups
dailymail.co.uk / 4 April 2019
Ecuador’s UK ambassador REJECTS Wikileaks’ claims that Julian Assange
is about to be expelled from its London embassy and arrested
dailymail.co.uk / 4 April 2019
Floating city dubbed Oceanix will save
coastal cities from flooding caused by climate change, UN project claims
dailymail.co.uk / 4 April 2019
Middle-aged treated like 'second class citizens'
telegraph.co.uk / 4 April 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering
Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3
CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and
'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality
Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom,
Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||