Mar. 31, 2019 (#1714)
"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan
Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)
The Human Condition:
"Propaganda, Persuasion, sides, Age,
Indecision,
Add
Experience, You Have, The Human Condition."
© Alan Watt Mar. 31, 2019
*Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt -
Mar. 31, 2019 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS: CTTM
P.O. Box 815
Keene, TX
76059 USA
EMAIL: alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com
(Because of
bombardment of Trojans and Downloader Viruses and Spyware, will be deleting ALL
mail containing attachments.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF
ALAN WATT
cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
cuttingthroughthematrix.net,
cuttingthroughthematrix.us,
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca
MIRROR SITE
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
INTERNATIONAL AND
MULTILINGUAL SITE
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi folks, I'm Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The
Matrix on March 31, 2019. The snow
outside is still pretty deep but at least it's
beginning to thaw a bit and sink a bit.
I hope, in fact, and we all hope in this area that we don't have too
quick a thaw because then you get flooding, like crazy. And where I am in the country you have
culverts on these roads, especially the dirt roads and they get washed out if
it's too much of it fast, especially when you're in a bit of a valley [Alan
chuckles.] and it's coming down the hills as well on both sides. But that's the way it is.
And hopefully I'll be getting a bit healthier
weather soon because now it's so damp, soo incredibly
damp. I think everyone around has got
bronchial problems, as we all know, from different reasons of course. I always
think about the incredible geo-engineering which you can find lots of articles
from the universities that are participating in the studies and so on. Even before they really started to spray back
in the 90s they talked about the different effects it
would have on humanity, with health effects on the lungs and so on, different
age groups too, young and old, and those with compromised or asthmatic systems
or something. So, you really are seeing it of course in this
day and age.
It's astonishing. I mean, I remember when I was really small, [Alan chuckles.] pretty small, really, I mean
really small, looking at different statements that came out into newspapers.
One of them was to do with the theme – today we have meme's and themes but back
then it was more kind of like a theme – and how it was to do with the
politicization of medicine, for instance, as an example, where they'd have
their fads. Those organizations that
push themselves as being scientific really do have fads. And yet we’re all
getting trained to just go along with the present fads. Back then it was the same too. When anybody back in Scotland at that time,
and I'm sure most of England too, with the National Health Service, got a sore
throat around the age of four or five or whatever it was, you are pretty well
booked into the hospital and you had your tonsils and your adenoids whipped out
just like that. The theory at that time was because evolution was kicking in,
you see, and oh, we are descended from the apes and because we’re walking
upright instead of walking on all fours, your sinuses get blocked, you get
infections and it goes down into your throat, etc. etc. So, the answer was to just whip them out.
It was the same for appendix of course, oh, it's
a vestige left over from prehistoric times pretty well. It's amazing how they just came out with this
rubbish, you know. Really. I mean,
you've got no proof of anything really except hey, this little gland here or
whatever it is, has got an infection in it. That's what you have
to treat. But when it comes down to, well
you don't need these things anymore because you've evolved… Now everyone of
course that got the problem, that got them all whipped out, your tonsils and
your adenoids, are very prone now to all kinds of bronchial infections. Because
that was one of the first lines of defense, it caught the problem and hopefully
most of the times it could actually deal with it, with
a good immune system, it was almost like a trap. A good chunk of your immune system was taken away
when they took them out. [Alan
laughing.] You forget that too.
But yeah, the so-called sciences go through
amazing fads. And that's just the way it
is with them. And when you get politicized... And it's
so manipulative politicized events
happening, and themes and all the rest of it, especially to do with control and
social control and global control... And they found their enemy to bring
humanity together of course. They did away with the alien one that Lester B.
Pearson talked about. Because that's
what they were hoping for. They churned out so many Sci-Fi’s. I've been
thinking about that this all week, so many Sci-Fi’s, way back in the 40s and
50s, where nobody really was into anything like that. But they churned them out like crazy. That
started to give folk the idea, well it's maybe plausible, it's maybe plausible.
But they couldn't pull it off. They
couldn't get the technology to simulate a full-scale invasion pretty well. So they hit on the idea that global warming, famine
and the like, pestilence, and plagues and so on, that would fit the bill,
you see, the Club of Rome. It's quite
fascinating because just before that they had in the 1960s, early 60s, you had
really cold weather and deep winters for... We get these, this is normal, back
and forth like that. It's not… And you can get 10, 15 years of really cold winters and then it'll be a bit milder for
another few years. Just up and down, you see. We're not in a clockwork universe
at all.
They really banked at the time on ‘the coming Ice
Age’. All the big ones that were pushing eugenics, for the same group actually, the Club of Rome. [Alan chuckles.] They had
Paul Ehrlich with the Population Bomb. That was all tied together, completely tied together,
too many people, and there'll be even more too many people down the
road, therefore how do you deal with it now?
Well, we've got to have an enemy. The
people are the enemy, and therefore, let's start taking over control of
what people do, and take away their choices of what they do, and then you can
direct the future. That's the idea. And
Ehrlich, I think it was Paul Ehrlich’s wife, I think she was on the board, the
actual board of the Club of Rome as well.
And when that didn't pan out then they hit upon ‘the global warming idea’. Well, that's kind of died off in the West in
all countries too, so it's just turned to ‘climate change’, it's just like,
how's the weather today, that's good enough. That's how we're manipulated with
these agendas.
And there are
definite agendas. Everybody
involved, and I can see their point, you can see the point of course. Everybody
involved in working together and planning the future, who churned out the books
on it, from eugenics, all the way down to Julian Huxley at UNESCO and his
brother Aldous Huxley, Aldous Huxley was quite open about the fact that that
was his biggest worry in the future was overpopulation. And everybody in his
class and his ilk were of the same mindset of course. Hasn't changed.
During World War II, they had a meeting in London
and the king presided at the time, before he died, over it. At the time they weren't killing enough in
war. Like Bertrand Russell said, you
know, it hasn't killed enough off, if
only we could have plagues every so often it might keep the population down.
That's what he said, Bertrand Russell, this wonderful hero of eugenics and
socialism. But folk don't stop to think
what they're hearing sometimes. And many
folk at the bottom actually agreed with them, not
realizing that just because you have a little flag that you wave for whatever
party you join, means that you are
going to get spared either. Because George Bernard Shaw said the same thing,
you know, you'll have to come to us and
explain why we should keep you alive when we are in control.
Literally. You see, you're taking up the
world's resources, hm.
And you've got all these articles, oh, each
child, in statistics and so on, each child that's born will consume so much of
this, that, and that, and that, and so much will be necessities just to say
alive and other ones will be, not necessities but it's what they want. And they
have all the statistics, etc., what we're all costing the planet. And as you turn everything into, what? Into energy.
Because that's the real currency, is energy. And
that's why you're seeing all the talk about energy and cost of energy. It's
also to do with everything that you need to live. Not just heat and cooling or whatever, or
keeping your meat cold in the fridge or your vegetables or whatever it happens
to be. It's also to do with what you are consuming, you see, your cost to the
planet in energy terms.
That's where everything eventually, they hope,
and I can see it happening... I don't
think there's anything they plan, the big boys plan at their big panels at the
United Nations and UNESCO, that they cannot do… given enough time and enough
propaganda, total control of the school system for indoctrination. As Jacques Ellul said, you've got to get them, indoctrinate them early,
from early years, and then subsequent propaganda will take very well with them,
they won't question it. He was a
hero, Jacques Ellul, of even Kissinger, he put out accolades about him. He simply knew his stuff. He was a real
philosopher. And he knew human nature
and he knew the history, enough folk could be
manipulated into following a certain path. It's quite easy.
And all, ALL tyrants in the past have gone for
the school system first. It's so imperative that you get the school. And then you get young children. Russell said
it himself in one of his books. He says, we
used to… And 'we', I love the
'we' part, who's the 'we'? We used to think we’d have to take children
from the parents at birth and have the state rear them, in collective
nurseries basically. And they did try that in some countries by the way, for
those who don't know that. What he said, we
found if we get the children young enough, through scientific indoctrination, he
said, then the children can be
completely, can go to school, they can get their indoctrination in school, come
back to the home and because of scientific indoctrination at school any
input by parents would be completely ignored, it will not take, it won't
take with the child. So therefore, the state will give them their culture and
their belief systems and their education, and the parent will simply be an
economic supporter, they'll pay for everything. That's what he said. And that's what's happened, isn't it?
For those who can't stand back and see it, you
understand, you don't need things to be spoken at times, as you go through it
and live through it, you take it for
granted. And all the studies they show today, very few people, actually [Alan
chuckles.] there's even fewer and fewer people, as I say, that are actually parents, like together for any real length of
time. But most of them, if there are
parents there, have the children go off and do their own thing as soon as they
get into the home. They've all got their own Internet system in their rooms,
their TV channels in their rooms. And so are the parents. So everybody goes and does their own thing.
So true enough, the parents generally tend to be economic providers and the
state gives them their values, their new value system that's drastically
different from, say, grandparents.
Parents now are already so far along the road
that they accept the changes much quicker. It's all a formula. And it's not speculation on my part, this is
from their own journals and so on that I'm talking about, in psychology, etc, and behaviorism and sociology. It's all done, the
piles of data, especially now with Internet with the constant data collection
from thousands of sources, it's astronomical, and it's pretty
precise once they have it all on every individual, they
can predict pretty well most of the things you're going to do in life. They
really can. Even the question mark
factors. For instance, you might have a
gene that will come to the surface and you go towards alcoholism, for instance,
or you're really into the cannabis and more so than other people. And don't
forget, there are people that are addicts to different things. Some are
addicted to alcohol. And some of the
folk, when alcohol, don't even touch cannabis, vice versa, and other ones will
do both. So there are addicts, and they can actually equate
that into, it'll put into the equation of the personality types, even down to
when it might hit them, and it will affect their performance in life and so on.
It's quite interesting where everyone's
categorized and put into little slots basically. And every day more data's added as you put up
your data up online, etc. Or even if you look at different things online. They
say that YouTube is one of the biggest collector of data, for those who
are analyzing you, according to what you watch. Right down to the algorithms
that decide, well, they watch this, therefore, maybe they'll watch, then
they'll put all that stuff down the side there expecting you to watch it. They
don't really give you a choice eventually, they are deciding for you what they
think you should... Well, you can imagine how they can guide you [Alan
chuckles.] along.
When you realize too that even articles you look
up, ‘people who looked up this also
looked at that’, you're being guided along a certain path. And maybe some
people think that's great, I don't know, it's tended to analyze you and is
deciding what you might want to watch. On the other hand, it might want you to
watch something else, if you are being a test subject. They do have test
subjects, you understand that. And test
subjects don't know they're test subjects. Or, as they say, that which is being
experimented upon will alter what it's doing because it knows it's being observed.
That's basic science, so they don't let you know if you're being
experimented on. However, they could certainly send you data, couldn't they,
make you paranoid. And have you follow
through with some crazy data. That's true as well. And all the ways you're being studied of
course.
I remember years ago looking at articles put up
by the Pentagon of the US and, again, whatever the US does everybody else is
doing at the same time pretty well. But they did say
that they did have different kinds of viruses they could send live online and
alter, they actually said, [Alan chuckles.] and
whether it's true or not, they could actually kill somebody. The idea
being that... And we don't… Again, it's so clever in the weaponization of
things, how you can study things, again, you'll take for granted and you won't
think of. You take the pixels in the computer and it
said that by sending little clusters of pixels in colors and so on they can
literally break through the visual input that you have and go straight to
different parts of the brain, like a program.
Just by manipulation of certain pixels, etc., to the side of your direct
pupil, the center of your pupil and things like that, and swirl them around or
whatever it happens to be, and consciously you'd be kind of oblivious of it,
but they say they could actually program you.
And it is true that when your heart is beating,
the initial beat comes, the signal for the beat comes from your brain. That's
what happens in heart attack. Often in heart attack you'll find that that
little nerve there to the heart gets damaged and the signal doesn't get
through. But the heart will go into automatic block, it calls it, where it will
beat about 40 beats a minute to try and keep you alive until, you know, you can
get hospitalization or whatever. Anyway, that's getting off the topic. But the
fact is, they claim they can actually stop your heart
in certain cases. Now, I'm sure the very
fact they said it, even if they hadn't done it, ha, if they tried to do some
breast-beating to the rest of the world of how great they are, I'm sure that
got the rest of the world motivated right away to try it. And so we'll never
know if these things are successful or not.
I do know, and so do the studies out there, that the
Internet definitely is affecting our minds, for sure. And maybe our psychology as well, like all
data does.
Today we have so much data getting thrown at us.
Most of it’s nonsense or just trivialities or even
repetition. But it reminds me actually this week again
of the same articles you would see when they were doing studies about
television and how much television per week the children were consuming and how
it was affecting their performance at school and life in general. We know too for instance, that the children,
if they're given a lot of TV, especially restricted television, will throw off
the old rules of social interaction, in different sexual ways, for instance. They
might be more promiscuous. Or, more hyper addicted in a sense to something
which is a drive. Drives are like eating, well, necessities like eating, or sexual drives and so on can be highly,
highly, highly addictive. Obviously. And
hyper-sexualized especially, very easy to do with the constant repetition of
the same kind of things over and over and over on the brain. It's understood.
And it's not healthy because... And I'm getting
off the topic, but I thought I should really say it before I do forget it. The same thing with the Internet because
there's so much pornography out there on the Internet and children have access
to it. If a child in the home doesn't know how to do it, somebody at school is going to show them very quickly on their
iPhone or whatever it happens to be. And they all have their phones, isn't it?
But you've got to also remember an article I put
up a few years back and it was from a Canadian newspaper about a Canadian
psychiatrist who worked with the prison inmates that have sexual problems. He had to quit. It was an awfully good article. He admitted, he said, the stuff they were
showing the prisoners, for instance, repeat offenders on that type of sex and
all kinds of things, he says, affected him as well until it was affecting
his relationship in the family. And what
it is, it becomes addictive to you. You'll have these odd thoughts that'll just
jump in your head at the wrong times and dominate the rest of your thoughts
maybe for an hour, for the day, whatever it happens to be. Or until perhaps you
act out on them. And then it's
destructive, you see.
So there are certain things that all generations
going way back into the dawn of history have always known. Certain things had
to have rules or you had chaos, personal chaos, family
chaos, and even tribal chaos. They didn't have welfare systems back then. It's
only recently you have any welfare
system. People are really counted on to decide what they want to do and if they
made the wrong decisions you took the consequences. That included male and
female for pregnancy, so they would get hitched up and look after the child.
Because the tribe didn't have, as I say, extra, welfare, they couldn't look
after extra, extra, extra, so that whole point was always pushed and promoted.
And of course, mistakes will always happen, but even then, at least the tribe
would often take care of them, of the effects and the excess children. But everything in the past was done for a
reason. Naturally. If you had chaos-chaos you'd never get out of chaos and
you'd have perished long ago as a people.
Basic rules developed because, and the taboos about different things
developed too because certain things are detrimental to the unit and to the
tribe. Of course they are.
But on television, and children, and the Internet
and so on, it truly is, especially now. [Alan laughing.] The whole, we're
living in an era where there's just so much pretense about how free we really
are. Hm.
But are we really? We live in the most surveilled society that's ever existed.
And it's getting worse all the time because they're putting more and more money
out on more surveillance, even deeper surveillance. And any rights that you had pretty well are gone long ago because of all the stuff
that's happening. Anything that's left, you won't have that either.
Right now it's kind of semi-voluntary to even
take out what they call loyalty cards at grocers and things like that. They look upon you as crazy now, in no time
at all, a few years, and now you're crazy if you don't have one, what's wrong with you. And every other
store you go into is the same thing too. So you're being nudged out of making
your own decisions in order to be accepted by those
around you, obviously. It's all understood by the nudge groups that I've
mentioned before, that have international groups of professors and behaviorists
and psychologists working to nudge you to make what they call ‘the right
decisions’, about everything, including what you think about different things
too. Without your knowing about it.
So you've got to treat all information and those
little devices that bring information to you, and take it away from you too,
and new information away from you, you've got to treat them all very
carefully. Because there's way more than you just having fun somewhere and
deciding what you want to do on that machine.
As I say, TV was bad enough. And
TV, again, brought in, eventually towards the end, especially, had a very
debased culture. That's what they show you.
I put out the links ages ago on Adam Curtis. He put awfully good
documentaries out there to do with how the TV industry, and the radio industry
in Britain, for instance, used to put out very staid patriotic kind of stuff, and
it was all really propaganda. Like Ellul said the same thing, Jacques Ellul, anything to do with police or hospitals
and healthcare that you're watching in drama format is pure
propaganda to make you really believe in it all, that's what it is there
for and so on.
You got to go back to the Communists. Stalin was very open about the role of the police,
and the role of the military that could also work alongside them. He said to
keep total power over the people you've got to have these organizations. To keep power over them. Not to control, just
to control, but to keep power over
them, that's the reason. And he also said teachers too, you couldn't keep the system together and
indoctrinate the people without getting them as children and the teachers were
awfully good, that was really their function, was indoctrination.
But all information that's put out there for
little documentaries and entertainment by the BBC at one time was pure
propaganda. Curtis shows you little
shows like Dixon of Dock Green, Sgt.
Dixon, that was his weekly show. It was a drama. And he was a really good guy, no matter what happened, he’d be awfully
lenient to young people and things like that. But he'd, you know, go after the
bad guys, etc. And so, you had things like that happen all the time. Then you
had programs in Britain, and other stations when they eventually got other
stations coming in, to do with Emergency-Ward
10, what happened in the hospital. And that made you obedient to the staff
and it made you worship the doctors.
And that's the function of it. [Alan
laughing.] And like Bertrand Russell
said, that everyone will believe that
they have the best healthcare system in the world, because the government keeps
telling you so. Hm.
But yeah, so Curtis went through that. Then he
went through the change into the 60s, because they decided to alter
the culture, reduce the family unit and the power of the family, and promote
promiscuity. That's what the sexual revolution was about. For those who don't quite get it. It didn't
happen by itself. It was literally
promoted from the top, from the top
down. Through all entertainment, from
the top, in Britain especially in the
BBC and so on, it was a government institution run by the people from Eton and
Cambridge and so on, for the government.
So I'm sure every other country went the same way, at the same time, with
the same format, you see.
So getting back to, number one, you create a
problem by promiscuity. But it's not a problem, is it? You're reducing marriage
because the more sex people have with the different partners the less chance it
will be of staying with a partner to have children. That does it very well. You also brought in abortion, because you had
to deal with the fallout from unwanted pregnancies which became very common and
so on and so on. And at the same time
you put out a music like Bob Dylan telling the parents to, don't stand in the hallway, you know,
get out of the way basically, the times
they are a changing. That was a
revolutionary song. Supposedly coming
from young people, supposedly, to the older generation and the adults. Get out
of the way. You can't criticize what you can't understand. Think about
the wording of all that kind of stuff.
Hm? Meanwhile all the children
were depending on their parents for money and everything else. But you're going to have the children dictate to the parents? Hm? And
they rapidly changed society.
I've mentioned it many times, even the last
little while, about psychology and why do you think marketers use psychologists
and behaviorists to sell products? Because they understand human nature and
they understand the different milestones that even children go through all the
way up through adulthood. And that's why all the candy’s stuck in the checkout counter
in stores and supermarkets and so on. Because the child's going through, they
know, through countless tests that moms and dads or anybody with children are
anxious when you're in a line, because of a natural tendency, you don't want to
be in the way and hold up the line behind you. And the child will start acting
up as they grabbed the candy, it's all within their reach, and you'll
automatically pay for it, okay then,
just to get out of that lineup and away rather than cause a fuss. Psychology. Psychology. Psychology. You see.
Well, that's what sex is when you say to young
folk, when they're dispersed into their hormonal range, go
and have sex and do what you want. And the state will take care of any
problems for you, and even any fallout from diseases, and if they can treat the
diseases they will, you see. So children, it's like candy to children, isn't
it? That's what they give them.
And out of it they hope, literally, they can do
the same across the whole world. Because
they were awfully successful with the experiments across Europe. Very
successful. As the country's population started to plummet. They keep
incredible data, awfully accurate data everywhere on population reduction from
the native populations. On marriages even and all the other programs they
brought in too. So different types of
groups won't have children at all. Children
are coming out of school, with the slogans, like you find that that's what
Lenin said they'd do, we shall win by
slogans. Everything today is a slogan you'll notice. So they're
prattling on, don't eat meat, and also, don't get
married, no children, no children, save the planet, sustainability. And it's all mantras. It's all these little
slogans that they've got given to them, by adults
of course. So the future's
already planned for them.
But here we live in a society and we pretend that
we have rights. And we pretend we’re in democracies. I've never seen in the
so-called democratic country the people’s advice taken, I've never seen it
happen, or even what they want to
happen, in a vote. I can remember when
the United Nations came out with the super cities idea, they want us all into
super cities according to this governmental system called the UN that we don't
vote for. They wanted to amalgamate all the rural areas and towns and so on,
that used to manage themselves awfully well because only in your area do you
who live there know what it really needs done, right, and the further that part
gets away from you, the less likely you're going to even get noticed down the
road when they are complete. Just like
the EU parliament, it doesn't even see the other countries, really. And so,
they amalgamated lots of countries.
Then Toronto was the same in Canada. And they
actually gave a vote out for people who really objected. They didn't want to lose their little areas
and little places and place names and so on, and to be into some huge
incredible, again, centralized system, Marxism again, for the economists and
those who run capitalism. [Alan laughing.] It's all one thing, folks. They gave them a vote and it came out pretty overwhelmingly to leave it as it was. So the counselors down in Toronto in Queens
Park and all the rest of them, the local politicians and that, they said, well we know we gave it to you and all that
but we can't really follow through with it, we've got to go ahead and basically
ignore your vote, because we didn't have to give it to you anyway. That's
what they said in the papers anyway, [Alan laughing.] we didn't have to give it to you anyway, so it doesn't matter. [Alan laughing.] And they ignored it. Something like the Brexit thing too in the
UK.
Because you truly are living through big global
agendas. And they are global, obviously, because what happens in one country
generally happens across the planet at the same time in other countries. Even
all the different laws they keep changing. In fact, it's mandatory that you
adapt to the changes that happen, say, in Canada and the US, before it happens
anywhere else, it's mandatory, across the world, you must adapt and do the same
thing. You can't get a loan from the World Bank without going along with a
bunch of demands on social changes, that's how it's used today. And it's not to do
with just giving food to the poor across the planet. It's
implementing social changes. They have the people across the planet shaking
their heads, like, what?... hey... what?
So you're already under a form of governance, as
I say. But nothing happens by itself. There's nothing, honestly, ha, you can do
electronically that isn't just monitoring you. I've got to laugh to an extent
at this incredible, aahhhhh, brush with China, Canada
and the US, over Huawei, the electronics company and communications company
from China. Because all the top companies, and even TELUS too, have used
modules and so on from that company. And it was okay up until now, really, pretty well, until the US started to get a bit of a spat
going with China. They've got a thing
with the China Sea now and China's influence, etc. over there… interfering with
the US over there too, you know. Everybody's, like that old song, I love that
song, Everybody Wants to Rule the World.
It's good to play that every so often just to remind you what's going on. And all sides are doing it.
But remember that China was built by the West.
For those who can remember. It's not ancient history, this. Through the 90s all
through the trade deals that were all signed too, the GATT treaties and
different treaties, and World Trade Organization, they brought China up to full
blast as a manufacturer for the planet pretty well.
Just like Karl Marx talked about, having one country make all the top goods for
the world, you know, even one factory for this, one factory for all shoes in
the world, and one factory… And that was the Marxist/Communist idea.
So the big boys, the CFR/Royal Institute of
International Affairs that are behind all the big moves to bring the world
together into one system, and to rule it by the way, and who talk about the
invisible government, [Alan laughing.] which is their members across the
planet, including the Trilateral Commission as well who are the real
technocrats. But anyway, they built China. We gave them the money. We in the
West watched our factories melt away as they were uprooted, and we paid for
them to move to China under the
Treaty. I lived through it, I watched factories close down one after. I even knew
folk in them who jumped, sometimes they would move to three factories over a
period of about five months, and they'd all close down,
boom, boom, boom. They'd be moved to
China. And we paid, we paid the companies and corporations to move to China. We
paid for what they would claim might be losses as they set up there and got
into full swing manufacturing, we guarantee to pay them for 15 years, they'd
have tax-free benefits too over in China.
And if they claimed they still hadn't made what they thought they would
have made, had they stayed in the original country, we would give them tax-free
for another 15 years or more help too, financially. We paid for all that as we
were left unemployed. I remember it very
well.
We've got to remember then that everybody is not
meant to work on computers and so on. For me, computers are boring things. I
really don't want to get into the why's and wherefores and how it works. I
really don't care how it works.
Honestly. It's a machine and if
it can do the basic things I need it to do, that's
good enough for me. I said years ago that the only reason I got one,
eventually, was because people asked me to do a show. That's the only reason. I
didn't have one up until then. Because I know what it is. And I enjoy a good
book. I enjoy the ability to go through a book and contemplate what I've just
read and walk about and think about it, you see. I don't need to just go
through distraction after distraction after distraction, click, click, click,
click as I'm being profiled, you see.
That's for me, personally.
And of course, it's a great boon for people in
business because they made it impossible to exist today without having them
doing it, you know, for business. You
see, your choices are being taken away. That shouldn't be, you know. If you're
free you have choices in things. And they're being taken away bit by bit. By a
definite program. By, as Quigley said, the
new feudal system will be the CEOs of international corporations. That's
the system they were bringing in, said Quigley. And they'll meet at the World
Economic Forum. We didn't set that up either. We’ll probably put funding towards it, I bet
you, through our money from the countries. They really constitute the big mechanism
today, along with the big foundations, working in the WEF and planning
it and working the future and training children and future leaders and so on. They're probably one of the biggest ones
out there running the show. Your governments go along to them. And we don't
elect them in, as I say, those systems.
And all the CEOs of corporations attend. Well, here you are. The feudal
system. The feudal system. No one wants
to think about it.
Again, I keep jumping back to some of the
excellent seers of their time who were quite dead, on about the future, and
that was Aldous Huxley, Brave New World
and George Orwell with 1984. And
really, 1984 and Animal Farm too, where he predicted a
world in Animal Farm, so much of it
is coming true right now by the way. And read the actual book, don't just look
at the little cartoons and stuff. Read the book and you'll find all the things
he said would happen. And here they are today. Yep. If you understand it all,
the analogies, etc.
Now, don't think either that I'm bitching about
something and bemoaning the loss of the past. The past, really, as I've said before,
had its good and its bad points. But really, it was also a horror show for most
people, I think. For most folk especially where I lived. And it was always
tension. People didn't know even then if there'd be work again. Britain had
been through countless wars, that's what they use the people for, countless
wars. And they had been literally
starved from about the early 1900s through World War I, and through the Great
Depression and into World War II, and rationing continued up until the 1950s.
The folk, you can see it in the generations what happened to them, ill and sick
and all the rest of it. That was a horror show.
Plus they signed deindustrialization pacts with
Eisenhower and others, of course, the Royal Institute of International Affairs
was all in on the act. Germany was to be set up as the industrial power for
this new idea for Europe. All quietly and secretively, they admit this now, so
much of it was done in secret. The
public were not to know, but this economic trading deal wasn't just a trading
deal, it was to eventually unify the whole, all the countries. Isn't that
awful. These democracies, 'eh? [Alan
laughing.]
So no, I don't bewail the past. Some of the past
was good, where you could have good friends, who did more talking, more than
one, and real interpersonal talk without computers or phones or anything, you
just talked, and you met and you talked. And you
laughed, you know, and things like that, you would have those times. But a lot of folk literally fell by the
wayside because they were written off by the system that really didn't want
them anymore. All they had was, when they brought on the drugs in the 60s, was
drugs or booze, basically, that was alcohol. That destroyed so many people who
saw no future. And again, when Thatcher came in in the 80s, well, in the 70s
through the 80s, she said, there's a
generation in our lifetime growing up in their lifetime who will never see work
in their lifetime, get used to it. She said that in a speech, that's the
plan. So you'd better start taking, I
would think, some notice of the system in which you live. Remember too, that
Aldous Huxley said to Wallace on the interview, he said that the people will come to love their servitude.
That's what he said he was afraid of, because
the techniques are so perfect.
Youngsters today think it's just fantastic, don't
they? They've never had the whole world at their fingertips really with the
gadgets. And it's all paid for by mom and dad, or somebody’s paying for it. They're entertained to death pretty well. They can have all the fun they want in life to
party and sex and so on, it's all… That is the norm now, that there's no hush
about it or even being quiet about it, it's all just promoted everywhere you
look. Therefore, you're in a different system already, you see. It took, I don't know, 20, 30 years to bring
it to this stage from then, you know. But it's all here. And there's no embarrassment. In fact, it's
rather, it's probably risqué to even invite folk over today. If you have a couple, and another couple, they
might be just kind of wild and just too, well, a bit disgusting and not polite
talk, put it that way, you know. And when you hear that kind of talk in
company, someone's making a play for somebody else, maybe next to you. [Alan chuckles.] That's how it works. But
everybody knows this.
Canada’s $27B canola market could lose $2.7B over China’s import block
- globalnews.ca / 29 Mar 2019
Now, getting back to the Huawei thing in China,
as an example, for instance, of what we see as a kind of farce as they go on.
Canada apparently, on behalf of the US, with whom they have an extradition
treaty, had arrested basically the financial officer I think they call it for
that company, who is the daughter of the man who created the company, that
Huawei. An order to extradite to the States,
I don't think she's been extradited yet. But really, I mean, that she might
have been, or, the stuff might have been spying in the States, this is the
excuse they're using.
China's been manufacturing pretty
well all the computers since about, since, phew, 2000. What's wrong here, 'eh? Come on here. Well, they might have backdoors,
they might have backdoors, etc. into different... Well, hey, we've lived through countless
stories actually over the years put out by our own
governments on all the backdoors that they
mandate must be in all our computers. So it's just a fight over who can spy on
us or something. I mean, if we're sharing all your data in this global system,
what's wrong, why are you excluding China, hm?
And since China is often making the computers,
most of the laptops have always been made in, I think it's one factory that
makes all the different brands in China for us all. And hhhhhh, as I
say, I don't think there's anything out there that can't be hacked into. I
really don't. In fact, so many articles over, that's about all I know about
computers, really, is that they are all easily hackable by those who understand
what they're doing. We've had different
whistleblowers over the years who've gone into it in great
detail, all the different backdoors that are already built-in, in other
words, to come in to your computers. And also
you have the same thing with updates on the normal systems that you have too,
and authorities often hijack them and jump in on the same time. You can't stop it.
So, it doesn't make sense. I don't think it's to
do with what they're telling us. It could be, certainly, that someone that's
after the whole market is either an American company, or a friend of America,
or something like that. There'll be some
other reason why this is happening. Because it's big, big money for business,
isn't it? And of course, China retaliated
by cutting the importation of Canada's canola oil, as an example. I think 40%
of that canola oil from Canada was always deemed for sale to China. So this is how it goes when it comes to big
business and power plays and all the rest of it. But as I say, I'm not quite convinced yet
that what the authorities have said is the reason is actually
the reason at all.
I'm going to put up tonight too, an awfully good
article on Huawei.
Huawei--Fake European town for 30,000 workers - dailymail.co.uk / 27 Mar 2019
I was very impressed by the, it's almost like
college campuses they're putting up across the world for those to study, people
to study and students to study. But so well laid out. And they've copied old
architecture, which is user-friendly. I can't stand these monstrous modern
monstrosities of glass that folk are stuck into. There's nothing I can relate
to in them. But you take the old buildings, and they've been awfully, awfully,
put up awfully good. You've got to hand
it to them, they understand psychology too. And they certainly can, I'm not
praising China, I'm just saying they understand psychology over their own
people too, don't they? And they
understand what works on their people works across the waters everywhere else
too. Of course it does.
But yeah, everybody wants to control everything
about us. And don't forget that China was picked, and the UN said it itself in
countless documentaries out years ago, lauding China and how it really picked
itself up by the bootstraps and so on and how it
was the model state for the world, according to the United Nations. Well, nothing's changed. And whether we like it or not, the whole
world is planned to be completely unified in a single system. And if it takes 10,000 knots to make it
happen, rather than just one big one, they'll certainly do it, it takes a bit
longer. Or they can bring it along with threat of destruction, etc. Or, again,
sustainability, sustaining the planet, oh
we're all here together, oh, where all humans must come together, we're not
fighting UFO invasion, we're fighting for climate change. You see, that's what they chose.
Now, let's go to some of the articles here, very
quickly of course. And I'll put these links up remember for those who want to
follow it. And that's all I do, is for those who are asking the questions at
least I can give them the data as to why things have happened and why things
are the way they are. How did we develop until now? What made it happen? What
are the organizations that made it?
Where did the planning come from, etc? How do they implement it into society for
changes, etc.? That's what I do.
And it stops a lot of people, I hope, from having to go through the
hell of killing themselves, youngsters especially with active brains knowing
something's just wrong with the way things are presented to you. And they don't kill themselves with drugs or
alcohol. Because that's what will happen to a lot of them if they don't. And
there are people who need to know
things, it's just their minds are different, that's the way it is, they don't
just accept things and say, oh well, you know. They want to know. And that's a good healthy thing.
It's just like with the Old Testament. The Old
Testament too, had people who studied history, of course they did. And the
so-called old profits used to go up to Kings in the Old Testament and dress
them down for doing wrongs and so on. Because they knew these wrongs would end
up no good for the people. You need these old characters, you know, once in a while that come along and say, wait a minute here,
we better think about this, this might happen, etc. You really do. But we are being trained to believe in
experts, like Russell said they would do, until most folk literally, they're
brainwashed by pretended experts who are just really as
blind as everybody else. They're the blind leading the blind. But they're
well-paid to lead you along preplanned paths for their masters. Obviously.
Anyway…
BirthStrikers: meet the women who refuse to have children until climate change ends - theguardian.com / 12 Mar 2019
No Thanks Cupid - dailymail.co.uk / 22 Mar 2019
I'll put that up tonight. And for those who want
to see it, this is your propaganda, you see, and you're going to save the
planet, and sustainability, and all that kind of stuff, etc. It's all fodder
for down the road for social work departments and psychiatrists and therapists
who will deal with the people who are just living in hell and depressed because
they missed out on things that later on they'll find
they might have enjoyed, or needed in fact.
Again, it's a good cop out too, isn't it. And an article about them, you have twins
being studied. Twins are always studied for different things because you can
get so much information from genetics and so on. But it says…
How being TOO KIND can lead to emotional burnout!
Two twins with
contrasting lives reveal the secret torment faced by millions of women
dailymail.co.uk / 30 Mar 2019
…and has some of them are just crashing in the
work system and other ones are doing okay, etc. etc. Because we’re under so
much stress to succeed into things perhaps that are really
irrelevant to us. We're told to have status, you see, approval and
status. But when so much is piled upon you, maybe it's time you start serving
yourself sometimes. Otherwise it will destroy you. It's not for everybody.
Also…
Psychiatrists 'must ask (Alan: ...children, they say ‘kids’ here, bit kids
are young goats.)
kids about social media use' (A: It dehumanizes them, naturally, the
terminology.)
news.sky.com / 30 Mar 2019
Psychiatrists must consider the impact of social media on all the children they assess for mental health problems, experts say.
(A: Again, EXPERTS say. You know, this priesthood of experts always tell us these things, you see, how we should think and all that. But it's true, they know all this stuff. They know what's going on. They know how we got to where we are actually already. They know this stuff.)
Cannabis, the wonders of cannabis of course, everybody's into it, you can't listen to any news anywhere on radio or anywhere, or on TV I'm sure, without the cannabis, oh, how wonderful it is. Because now the big multibillionaire companies are involved in it, and big big wealthy folk that are involved in it, and are advertising it everywhere, aren't we? Hm? Now it's good. And smoke from that's wonderful. Tar is thicker than cigarettes but don't… they say it's wonderful, the experts, so it's wonderful. There you go. That's your reality today.
Member of
Parliament Victoria Atkins…
MP Victoria Atkins accused (A: This is quite an interesting little story...) of 'hypocrisy' over legal cannabis farm
bbc.com / 14 May 2018
(A: This is a member of
Parliament in Britain. And she's a Drug
Minister, hey! It says…)
Drugs minister Victoria Atkins has been accused of "hypocrisy on a grand scale" over her husband's involvement in a legal cannabis farm.
Paul Kenward - who is married to the MP for Louth and Horncastle - is managing director of British Sugar, licensed to grow non-psychoactive cannabis.
(A: Well you see, once you get that you can get the other one, too, you see.)
The Home Office said Ms Atkins declared the fact in parliament when she was appointed minister in 2017.
(A: Now, she was picked for that position because she spoke out about drugs. [Alan laughing.] But once they started legalizing it and everybody gets, suddenly, oh they have a change of heart, you know, just a… Oh, I've given it more thought, you know. [Alan laughing.] It's amazing how money can just change opinions very quickly.)
She has previously spoken out against the Class B drug.
Peter Reynolds, president of Clear, Campaign for Cannabis law reform, said: "It's not just a conflict of interests, it is hypocrisy on a grand scale."
"The reason she was appointed is Theresa May was looking for someone who was a hard-line prohibitionist," he said.
(A: Well, she had a change of heart, as I say, when her husband said, you know, we can make millions here. Just, you just, it's very persuasive, you know. [Alan chuckles.])
There you
go. So that's one article on it
too. And this is another one, this is
quite amazing.
Tory Party (A: That's the conservative party.) deputy chairman’s dancer-turned-barrister (A: …which
is a lawyer in Britain.) cousin (A: So,
this deputy chairman's lawyer cousin, but he used to be a dancer… [Alan
chuckles.]) buys 4,000-acre farm in
Sierra Leone to grow and import cannabis after obtaining licence
to make drug for use in medicines
dailymail.co.uk / 30 Mar 2019
It's medicine, for goodness sake. It will be
dancing on naturally too, I'm sure. But,
ha, sometimes… I used to give talks about things you couldn't believe. It's
like someone, I've been asked before about Osama bin Laden and so on, you know.
I think the man supposedly, and different articles and different papers over
many years said he was dead. About 40 times. At different times too. Including
the early one when he died because apparently he had
kidney failure, bad kidney failure, according to the French at the time. He used
to go there to get renal dialysis done and so on. Anyway, I said I don’t
believe everything they tell me I said when they explain to me... In the US and Canada all you got, all you got
for all those years was, Osama bin Laden, Osama bin Laden, Osama, Osama, Osama.
And then they put in a guy as the president's in America called Obama. Obama
versus Osama. I mean, you can't make this stuff up, folks. You really can't,
can you? You can't! Hm, what's the odds of that, what's the odds
of that, hm?!
And then you
have Tory party deputy chairman's, right, whose cousin buys a 4000-acre farm.
Well, the politician, this politician, James Cleverly, the MP, this guy, that's
his cousin, right, James Cleverly, Clever as in clever, Cleverly, right, he's a
member of Parliament for, hold on to this, he's the MP for Braintree. Mr. Cleverly is the MP for Brain-, as in brain in the
head, right, -tree. Who makes this stuff up, hey? Hm? And his cousin has been awarded a contract,
because I don't know if he's dishing out the licenses, but it might even be for
Britain or other countries too, but is for medicinal
use only, you know. So there you go.
It's
amazing, all rights are wrong, and all wrongs are right, and this is the age we
live in isn't it. And that was all again part of, I think, Revelations,
wasn’t it, in the Bible. And people scoffed at it. We're living through
it. [Alan chuckles.] Wrong would be right, and right would be
wrong, etc. etc. Isn't that something,
hm?
And the
governments that we're taught to fear, don't forget we're taught to fear
governments, that's how it runs, everything is fear, can just change their mind
when it suits them, and the first one who always get on in the act are those
who work for governments. The same in
Canada, one of the big cannabis boards and so on. Hm. But
there you go. Mr. Cleverly's cousin, Mr. Cleverly was the MP for Braintree,
yep, okay. But it's only for, his cousin’s
only going to have it for medicine,
so you know, that's what it's for, medicine.
Also…
US officials order Chinese company to sell the popular gay dating app
Grindr over security concerns
dailymail.co.uk / 27 Mar 2019
(A: So, it's a Chinese company,
I didn't know that either. I don't know
what these apps are but the fact is, they are afraid
now... Or maybe it's already happened, we'll never know. We'll never really know. Because I know
intelligence agencies try to get everything on folks' sexual habits, for
blackmail purposes, that's what they have always done, hey. But it says...)
•Beijing Kunlun Tech, a web game developer founded by Zhou Yahui, is being told to sell the dating app over fears the Chinese government could access user data
(A: Everybody could, I'm sure, every agency on the planet could probably access the user data from it, I'm sure they could.)
•The Committee on
Foreign Investment envisioned scenarios where personal information could be
used potentially to blackmail defense contractors
(A: …interesting, hey.)
•The company paid $93 million for a 60 percent stake in 2016, acquiring the rest two years later for $152 million, and is looking to get twice the price they paid
So that's
the excuse they're using for it. Very old tactic is blackmail, of
course. By all countries, they all use it. They'll threaten to expose
you to whatever, and that's it, you know, okay
I'll do whatever you want.
Acute Illness Associated With Cannabis Use, by Route of Exposure: An Observational Study - annals.org / 26 Mar 2019
Andrew A. Monte, MD, PhD,
Shelby K. Shelton
(A: ...and whatever their
letters are behind it of course, and they're qualified people. They put an
article out.)
University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, and Rocky Mountain Poison & Drug Center, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado
(A: Stacks of folk took part in
this here it says. And they got the grants for the investigation.)
Grant Support: By a grant entitled “The Adverse Health Effects of Edible Cannabis Products” from the CDPHE.
(A: But it says they were...)
Disclosures: . . . tasked with reviewing the scientific literature related to the public health effects of cannabis use and exposure
(A: So they're all getting paid
to read, what they claim, this is such a joke, is they don't have enough data
on it. They've been studying this stuff since the 40s, you know. Literally.
They know exactly what it does. And even on postmortem and autopsy they, you
can actually see the stuff actually goes into the
brain, hey, into where the cerebral spinal fluid will go up into it, and they
can actually see the tissue is brown, it stays brown forever. And they can actually widen
as well, dilate it too, with it, because of it.)
(A: Anyway, it says that they're really investigating it on a big scale because there's so many problems coming up already. Which they have to, they could probably get more pills out like they always do with any drug, they bring out stuff to deal with side effects of different drugs. Well, there'll be a whole new industry when folk get odd side effects, etc. too, you see.)
Background:
Little is known about the relative harms of edible and inhalable cannabis products.
Objective:
To describe and compare adult emergency department (ED) visits related to edible and inhaled cannabis exposure.
(A: ...because there's a lot of problems with it. It says…)
Results:
There were 9973
visits with an ICD-9-CM or ICD-10-CM code for cannabis use. (A: These are crisis occurrences.) Of these,
2567 (25.7%) visits were at least partially attributable to cannabis, and 238
of those (9.3%) were related to edible cannabis. Visits attributable to inhaled
cannabis were more likely to be for cannabinoid hyperemesis (A:
That’s vomiting, excessive vomiting.) syndrome (18.0% vs. 8.4%) . .
.
That
happened in some people because of cannabis.
So they're breaking it all down, you see, trying to find out what's
causing this in them. The only antidote really so far to this problem they've got is stopping
altogether. Once it starts, you'll get it every time you take cannabis.
They've got a lot of money involved in this too, for the big, those involved,
the people involved.
A mysterious syndrome that makes marijuana users violently ill is
starting to worry doctors
businessinsider.com / 15 Feb 2018
A new study documented a sharp rise in emergency-room visits linked with marijuana following legalization in Colorado.
One of the key drivers of the ER visits was a mysterious syndrome characterized by severe nausea and repeated vomiting.
(A: So the only way to cure it
is to stop using it. They say
they're still not sure what causes it.)
The only known way to cure CHS is to stop using marijuana. Researchers still aren't sure what causes it.
(A: And it gives you, some people who end up literally getting uncontrollably sick, and they go into a bath and scald their skin and so on, they don't even feel it initially. And one person has done it for the third time in a row. And it's because of marijuana use apparently. Some folk are having seizures with it, nausea and so on and dizziness. Very similar to minor strokes for some of them in fact.)
In 2004, a team of emergency-room physicians in Australia detailed her experience anonymously alongside a handful of similar cases in the same region that year. In nearly all those cases, the people described an illness that cropped up suddenly, often after decades of normal marijuana use. Piping hot baths were their only relief.
(A: And some of them, for the feeling, you know, that they had with nausea, it says…)
Piping hot baths were their only relief.
(A: Interesting, ‘eh. Anyway, they’re calling it…)
The Australian physicians dubbed it "cannabinoid hyperemesis syndrome," or CHS.
(A: …-emesis, I suppose, is to
do with the whole syndrome, including the rashes and so on, well, and vomiting.
They also get stomach problems, nausea, and then permanent pain some of them in
the stomach area afterwards.)
Yeah, there
you go. Anyway, there's some articles, I'll put them up for those who want to
read them. Because it’s, and if you're using it's good to know, at least you
can watch out for it. Or you might be
able to see it in other people, or your children or friends or something, if
anything happens you can always put them in the right direction if it starts to
happen to them so they can get help. So,
mysterious syndrome in which marijuana users get violently ill, blah blah blah,
I've got two or three articles on it.
Another
article I wanted to put up too, with, you've all heard about the ‘pay to get
into universities’, top universities and Ivy League and all that, to set you up
there. I'm surprised they even bring it up, it's so common, that, it's always
been common. And across the world it's very common in some countries. I think
it will get actually worse as more of a rising middle
class in some countries appear. They
won't think twice about bribery and so on and payoffs to get their, all the
qualifications in the right universities they want. But there's an article here
too, about, I mean, you can pay for whatever you want going to university, if
you've got money, big money. Here you can get your thesis, your PhD thesis
written for you too.
EXCLUSIVE: We'll write your PhD thesis... for £6,173! British students cheat their way to
doctorates by paying companies to write their dissertations
dailymail.co.uk / 30 Mar 2019
•Three 'essay mill' companies told a reporter posing as a student that they would write PhD theses from scratch for between £2,559 and £6,173
So there you
go, it's pretty widespread across the world, I'm sure.
But Britain, British universities are stacked with people from across the
planet too, with money, big money. As I say, there's a rising middle class and
they've got money to spend. So, there you go.
The rise of robot authors: is the writing on the wall for human
novelists?
theguardian.com / 25 Mar 2019
It says
robots now are involved in writing novels. I knew for a while, ages ago that
they were writing small stuff, you know, small stories and stuff. Now they say
they're making awfully good ones for stories. But you take that, right, that's
computers, and getting back to universities...
I felt guilty when I got my results: your stories of buying essays
theguardian.com / 28 Feb 2017
(A: Politicians called...) Ministers want to get tough with students (A: They'd have to get tough with the ministers who also bought it.) who by custom-made work from ‘essay mill’ websites. Readers share their experiences
Tens of thousands of students are believed to have bought essays online and submitted them to university tutors, a practice known as “contract plagiarism”.
Last week Jo Johnson, the universities minister, called for new guidance to be issued for the next academic year, including tough penalties for students who buy essays and strong warnings about the consequences.
So they're
trying to get experts to study them now to find out if they can spot if these
are written by, for the people and so on. There's a lot more involved in all of this stuff. That's the way it is, 'eh.
Now, back to
this China/US spat basically.
Interesting, you'll see the rah-rah articles too of the US. It says…
US Air Force deploys B-52 bombers to Europe in message to Russia
edition.cnn.com / 21 Mar 2019
Washington (CNN) — The US Air Force recently deployed six nuclear-capable B-52 bombers to Europe for "theater integration and flying training" exercises with regional allies and NATO partners -- a move viewed as sending a strong message to Russia . . .
So that's
the European part, right. And then they talk about the B-52s. But the B-52s
have been going forever, you know. And apparently, they're going to use them
for another, up to at least the year 2050, that's the big agenda, big plan
there. Interesting, because they’re amazing. They must be awfully well
maintained all the time. Naturally. But another one...
U.S. Air Force B-52s participate in large exercise over Norwegian Sea - usafe.af.mil / 29 Mar 2019
They put
another group back in Britain, into an RAF base in Britain, again, when they
had all been taken out a while back, now they're back again. Kind of
semi-permanently perhaps, who knows?
I'll put that article up too. And also…
Stratofortresses (A: Stratofortresses, that's the same ones, right. It'll be the B-52H Stratofortresses they call them.) fly sorties over South China Sea, first since November - airforcetimes.com / 6 Mar 2019
So again,
Russia and China, Russia and China, Russia and China. It's big corporations obviously. Or maybe not so obviously. It might even all
be a farce for us to believe in, who knows, hey? I was very skeptical of the so-called Cold
War in Europe to be honest with you. But
big corporations make a phenomenal amount of money-making missiles and
weaponry. Which you never have to use, so you don't have to prove that it's
worth the billions that each plane will cost you. Or the missiles for that
matter. Which is
great profits for the companies that make them, they never had it so good as
they did during the Cold War.
Anyway, so
there you are, they got the articles to do with flying over near China of
course and the South China Sea, over Norway to warn Russia apparently. And
we're, it's almost a new cold… I
remember one of the first talks I gave years and years ago and I was asked
about Russia that had suddenly just given up. Just like Blast From The Past, you know, and at the
end you have the dad saying, oh… Because
he'd been living underground in a shelter all those years, and he was told that
it was all over with, Russia, they'd forgotten about communism and dropped it.
He says, oh, so they just gave up and
went home, hey? So the dad was told, oh,
it's all over, it was finished, they just gave up. He says, they gave up? …just like that? Just like that, he says, yeah, that's what happened? And of course, the dad starts pacing out on
the surface the plans for a new underground shelter. [Alan laughing.] But I said in one of the first shows that if
they need an enemy they'll just resurrect the bad bear again, you see. And that's exactly what's been happening.
Governments
tend to lose, especially corporations, they start losing a lot of hold over the
public. Remember, one of the things that they tell you, why you need government
is, yeah, you need to keep the peace and so on.
If they would all follow it
themselves. But they don't. There's a different reality for those up there as
to the ones down here. You find that
they don't follow the rules that they make you follow. Never do. And yet they
want you to believe in democracy. Hm.
And don't
forget the Plato said it himself, he says, there's
no such thing as justice, there's only the appearance at times of justice, you
know, you must give them a show but there's no real justice. I think of
the generations that have been used and abused by governments down through time
and it's horrific, absolutely horrific story. When you
look at, for instance, and how bureaucrats at the stroke of a pen can change
thousands of family’s way of living, for instance, traditional way of living.
Like the farmers across Europe, when they did that with the EU Dairy Compacts
and all the rest of it, putting them all under. They put them all under,
families that had been maybe 5th, 6th, 7th generation all went under because
bureaucrats decided they couldn't sell the milk and so on where they normally
sold it, or butter or anything like that.
That's bureaucrats for you. And
it's rather sad.
So
government is really a different creature than what you think it is. But one of
the big holds they have on you, when it comes to nations, is, we're here to protect you. Without that big threat, you see, they lose a
lot of power over the people, who would start to almost demand more freedoms. Once it’s peaceful folk will
demand more freedoms of different kinds. So you've got to keep something going
to frighten the public in order to say, we've got to
protect you. And they always find
something.
So I hope
we're not in for another 40, 50 years of the Cold War, tit-for-tat kind of
trade deal… and spite, you know, they're all spite-ing
each other. It's better than smiting
each other, certainly, but they certainly spite each other. And it's not a good way for being. It really
isn't. And we’ll never get told the real reasons behind it. But I think it's
partly control. And I think it's also big big big business, obviously. Kind of sad.
And it would
be fantastic to live waay in the future, just to see
how everything across the planet really works out eventually. Wouldn't it?
As I say, you won't stop it because it's planned this way but at least
it’d be good to document it, just to see it, it would be quite interesting. And
life should be interesting, shouldn't it.
For myself, Alan
Watt from Ontario, Canada, it's good night and may your God or your gods go
with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
BirthStrikers: meet the women who refuse to have
children until climate change ends
theguardian.com / 12 Mar 2019
No Thanks Cupid
dailymail.co.uk / 22 Mar 2019
How being TOO KIND can lead to emotional burnout!
dailymail.co.uk / 30 Mar 2019
Psychiatrists 'must ask kids about social media use'
news.sky.com / 30 Mar 2019
MP Victoria Atkins accused of 'hypocrisy' over legal cannabis farm
bbc.com / 14 May 2018
Tory Party deputy chairman’s dancer-turned-barrister cousin buys
4,000-acre farm in Sierra Leone to grow and import cannabis after obtaining licence to make drug for use in medicines
dailymail.co.uk / 30 Mar 2019
Acute Illness Associated With Cannabis Use, by
Route of Exposure: An Observational Study
annals.org / 26 Mar 2019
A mysterious syndrome that makes marijuana users violently ill is
starting to worry doctors
businessinsider.com / 15 Feb 2018
The rise of robot authors: is the writing on the wall for human
novelists?
theguardian.com / 25 Mar 2019
I felt guilty when I got my results: your stories of buying essays
theguardian.com / 28 Feb 2017
EXCLUSIVE: We'll write your PhD thesis... for £6,173!
dailymail.co.uk / 30 Mar 2019
Grindr security concerns
dailymail.co.uk / 27 Mar 2019
Canada’s $27B canola market could lose $2.7B over China’s import block
globalnews.ca / 29 Mar 2019
Huawei--Fake European town for 30,000 workers
dailymail.co.uk / 27 Mar 2019
US Air Force deploys B-52 bombers to Europe in message to Russia
edition.cnn.com / 21 Mar 2019
U.S. Air Force B-52s participate in large exercise over Norwegian Sea
usafe.af.mil / 29 Mar 2019
Stratofortresses fly sorties over South China Sea, first since November
airforcetimes.com / 6 Mar 2019
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering
Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3
CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and
'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality
Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom,
Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||