Mar. 10, 2019 (#1711)
"Cutting Through the Matrix" with Alan
Watt
(Blurb, i.e. Educational Talk)
"Witness Signs of Huxley's-Blair's Ultimate
Revolution,
Using
Geneticists, Bio-Chemists, Scientific Collusion - Part 3"
© Alan Watt Mar. 10, 2019
*Title & Dialogue Copyrighted Alan Watt -
Mar. 10, 2019 (Exempting Music and Literary Quotes)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ADDRESS: CTTM
P.O. Box 815
Keene, TX
76059 USA
EMAIL: alanwattcuttingthrough@yahoo.com
(Because of bombardment
of Trojans and Downloader Viruses and Spyware, will be deleting ALL mail
containing attachments.)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
THE OFFICIAL WEBSITES OF
ALAN WATT
cuttingthroughthematrix.com,
cuttingthroughthematrix.net,
cuttingthroughthematrix.us,
alanwattcuttingthroughthematrix.ca
MIRROR SITE
cuttingthrough.jenkness.com
INTERNATIONAL AND
MULTILINGUAL SITE
alanwattsentientsentinel.eu
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi folks, I’m Alan Watt and this is Cutting Through The
Matrix on March 10, 2019. At the moment I’ve got a bit of a, well, ice snowstorm
coming down here, again, in March, and the 10th. It’s
been one awfully long winter. It still going on, obviously. Because it’s just
snow for the next day or two maybe and ice pellets too mixed in. So it’s quite
something to have snow beginning in September, and no thaws basically, all the
way to the present time, and the snow is just building up and building up and
building up.
Of course, they’ll tell us once it’s over, by the
time June rolls around that it’s been the warmest winter in history. Because we
live in such nonsense today, don’t we?
That’s how bad it is. Because it’s a big, big agenda and the folk
literally, the people have no idea, have no idea I mean really at all, even the
ones who think that they’ve looked into it in any kind
of detail, they have no idea how old and how all-encompassing this agenda is. It’s
everything for the ones who control the world. It’s going for broke basically.
We’ll be broke and they’ll win. But
that’s how it all works out, you see. Very ancient agenda.
They couch it in all different kinds of terms…
world orders, and globalism, and global governance, and global government even. There’s
even articles in different papers talking about, is it time for global government.
They keep floating the trial balloon and getting you used to the
idea. It’s quite something to see,
actually and to live through it.
But folk have no idea, because we we’re taught
just to accept things as they are. Anyone who knows what’s going on, who
doesn’t belong to the elites, are obviously conspiracy nuts. That’s what
they call you, you see. That term itself was put out by intelligence agencies
after the death of Kennedy back in the 60s to ridicule anybody who just pointed
out so many inconsistencies in the Warren Commission’s report. It works awfully
well.
The public, it’s so sad isn’t it, how things work
out so uniformly repetitively well for the elite. It’s like the mob in ancient
times, or the Middle Ages, say, when someone was going to get their head cut
off by royalty for some reason or another, like Henry VIII for instance. The people would go to it. It was kind
of like a fair thing for them because that was the most entertainment they
generally got in their lives. There would be jesters going around the crowds
like jokers. They would sell things at
these fairs basically. They’d all see the blood and guts and go back, ooo, aaa, ooo,
just like a horror movie. It was just too easy,
too easy for the proclamation read by whoever it was speaking on behalf of the
crown, reading out the sentence as to what they did. Even though, even the
public in their subconscious knew these people didn’t do anything like this,
whatever it happened to be. But that was good enough for them.
And nothing’s changed. Today it’s just, you’re a conspiracy
theorist. Who says so? Hm? Someone in authority of the government says it’s a
conspiracy theory. But that’s what you get, isn’t it? Because you’ve got
counterintelligence, which is counter to
intelligence, that’s what counterintelligence
means. All the spy agencies have them. Your government has internal and
external agencies dealing with that, and internal ones deal with the people
inside the country. It’s astonishing,
but just like the crowds and ooo, aaa,
ooo as the ax comes down after the reading of the
verdict and the reason for it, they’re just the same today as they were then
really. Well, yeah, a conspiracy nut, you
know, huuuuuuuu.
That’s what they label anybody who comes out
with, even if you’re reading official articles from the government. Isn’t that
astonishing? Isn’t it amazingly astonishing, you can read them from the
government’s own websites and departments and agencies and people will still
class you as a conspiracy nut. Because
you’ve made a strange inquiry into finding out in the first place, that means
you’re a nut, you see. Because they would never think about looking in
the first place. They’d rather not know. That’s the difference.
So anyway, this is part three, it really wasn’t
going to be a three-part thing, on eugenics and the plan, the big agenda. It is
a big agenda. You hear Bush Senior at the time when he was the president
talking about a New World coming into
view, a new world order. His son said the same thing about 10 years
later, exactly. It’s quite fascinating to live through this and watch it and
hear at all happening, in coding that the public don’t understand. What do they
mean a New World Order coming into view? You know? Coming into view… Who’s
view? Who’s world order? Who planned it?
And even with terms like, it’s ancient and things like that, ancient
plan, what ancient plan? Did you know you were part of some ancient plan? Did
you know that?
It’s really something, isn’t it. So, this is
going to be part three as I say, because last week I covered a lot of stuff
from eugenics too, and touched on geo-engineering and so on, and the different
humanistic so-called sciences that are part of this agenda as they train the
public into behaving in certain ways, and believing certain things too, which
perhaps they shouldn’t. So this is part three of Witness Signs of Huxley's-Blair's
Ultimate Revolution, Using Geneticists, Bio-Chemists,
Scientific Collusion. This week is
part three I suppose and I’ll try and wrap some things
in.
As I say, these last three talks, I haven’t had
time really to work much on them, a lot is from my head and all the rest of it
because of this awful weather. I spent more time, honestly, during the day shoveling snow. And clearing the driveway. And chiseling,
literally chiseling [Alan chuckles.] really thick ice
at times off my vehicle in order to get it out. It can take an hour and a half
sometimes when it’s so heavy with ice and snow. And sometimes two hours with
the driveways completely covered as well because I’ve got a long, long
driveway. The rest of the time you’re
trying to get snow off even the pathway at the back at the house so I can get
in and out of the door. At the moment I’m kind of
walking down a slanted snow slope to get to the door. That’s how bad it is.
And trying to get the snow off the roof as well.
Because there’s been a lot of damage as I say this year, this winter, to people
with even flat roofs of course, naturally they get leaks all the time, other
people with strong roofs too if they haven’t managed to get the snow off it.
And then you get ice, and then you get snow and ice, like sandwiches of
multilayered snow and ice all the way until it’s about three or four feet high.
Or even higher. As I say, no thaws, it
just keeps building up and getting heavier. And eventually the big kaboom
happens and that’s you. And I’ve had
some kabooms here at night with the temperatures being -25 Fahrenheit, -30°F,
many a night actually, all the way through this
winter. It’s pretty regular this entire winter. But at
night, yeah, incredible temperatures once you hit about four in the morning,
five in the morning. Then during the day
most of the time too, you’re lucky if it hits 10 Fahrenheit, +10 Fahrenheit,
and you’re really lucky, and still way below the
freezing mark, or the freezing point I should say.
So then anyway, that’s our weather. But as I say,
it would be fantastic to hear that it’s been the warmest on record and that
we’ve got to give up all our rights and freedoms to save the world from global
warming. So that’s what we’re living through, farcical systems of control. But
as I say, the big boys planned this a long time ago. As I say, this is like
months and months now I haven’t had time to even work on much at all, on the
intellectual sphere, it’s mainly on the physical sphere of clearing the snow.
You’ve got to understand what we’re living
through, a big agenda. It’s all around you. It’s in all the symbols. It’s
always written symbols. Because at one time when religion ruled in, say,
the Western world and people were religious, which gave them their culture and
the way of life, so that they could at least help each other out when you
didn’t have welfare systems and welfare states, and you had famines and things
like that and bad crops, people helped each other out. It was utterly necessary
to have a cohesive religion with its commandments of helping each other out
basically and looking after people as you would look after yourself basically.
Of course, the enemies of all of this, that use
different terms, including reason of
course, cloak themselves in societies, behind societies that would use
terminology that would sound vague, vaguely religious, sometimes they would
sound religious, as though they’d taken things from, say, the holy books and so
on. But in reality, they’ve
got their own version of what it all means and you’ll
find down through the ages that Lucifer is the hero of course of the
particular groups that all flourished from the same one group long ago. Lucifer
really stands for intellect,
intelligence, reason. Today secular humanism too of course, it’s
the same kind of thing. But it is a religion, a belief system that man’s
ability, through his brainpower, his intellect and so on, he can make utopia on
the world and run things the way that it should
be run. According to those who want to rule it all. And who pretty well do today in fact.
Under the guise of science, they tried to
validate all the different things that they have to
rule over you with, by using all these different sciences, and using academia
that you don’t vote into any office of course. We’re living in an age where
everything’s appointed over you, it’s appointed by governments that pretend
that they’re yours but they’ve got nothing to do with
you in fact. Except you pay them. Too
much in fact. But that’s the way it is.
But in the Middle Ages and even beyond, right up
to not too long ago, they had to couch their terminology so that they didn’t
get found out as subversive of a system. And don’t forget, up into the
1800s, especially in America, the people would turn on anybody who, it wasn’t…
blasphemed their religion… Blaspheming. It had a bigger attack basically, focus
on your whole culture, everything that kept you all working together and
surviving together, that’s really what it was. Bit by bit it’s been chipped away and chipped
away, especially through the 20th century. And with massive wars, and causing massive
slaughter, they would achieve many goals for those who were taking the world
over. Because they had to put you into
shock. They had to make you ask silly
questions like, why does God allow the wars to happen? Well, if you’ve got free
will, man, man can be guided into
wars quite easily by those who are… rather evil.
But free will is free will. If you didn’t have free will you’d be a
robot. Which is what the other group want you to be actually,
a completely brainwashed robot.
Like Bertrand Russell wanted, someone who you could train as a child and
indoctrinate every belief, every thought that they had would be indoctrinated
into them perfectly with scientific technique. And well documented, all my old
talks have got the stuff in it. And remember, you can go into my archives
section @CuttingThroughTheMatrix.com. Because it goes way back, and every other
talk show host out there who covers any of these topics goes into my stuff all
the time. Including all the big shows. Because why do the work when I’ve done
it already? And they just reel it all off.
And even the recent stuff annoys me too because within the next few days
you hear the top ones, the top ones parrot off the
stuff I’ve just put out a few days before.
But in my archive section I gave lots of talks on
what’s called the ‘occult’, which is just ‘hidden’ of course. And even in ancient times, they had on say
Hebrew accompanying literature, they didn’t just have it in their writings,
they had many other writings too that accompanied the ancient traditions and
ancient happenings. Myth, partial myth, what is myth? Myth is generally
something you can’t validate anymore. But so is most of history, isn’t it? You’ll find I think it was Oxford University
Press put out a good book on Jewish Myths and Legends, it
was called I believe if I remember right.
They had awfully good stories in it if you really waded through it, and
some of them were humorous of course.
Other ones touched on strange rituals that
happened within certain sects that developed in the old Judea area. Where one
of the sects was pretty well exactly the same as the
sect which developed in the Middle Ages in parts of, well, especially in
France, parts of France to do with the old Knights Templar stuff and all
the rest of it that’s been lumped into it.
But they did have the same accusations, that families and
members of these groups would all go into these caverns or caves or underground
passages, like a labyrinth thing, and they’d go through a ceremony. And lights would go off, they would get blown
off, and they literally have sex with whoever was next to them. It didn’t
matter what gender it was either, supposedly, or even if it was their own kin.
That was the same, same accusations that you find were given to not only the Knights
Templar groups that eventually moved into parts of France, almost exactly the same in fact.
You find the rituals were so similar, very similar to the Albigensians
that lived in southern France at one time too, and various Gnostic groups. They had very similar creeds of belief and
behavior and culture in their systems, where the world was pretty
well evil, which a lot of folk can’t doubt that. But they actually said in the Albigensians that they should attempt
to dissuade children from having, growing up to have infants. And that can
lead from one thing to the next until you have the ancient Greece
philosophy basically, the Greek philosophy had infanticide. So there’s a lot
more to it naturally than meets the eye. Even though different groups are
always stigmatized by powerful groups, who win eventually over them down
through time, and it’s the same right up to the present day, but it doesn’t go
into who started it in ancient times or whatever. But it was fairly
widespread across that area long, long ago.
You also find old passages that were taken, maybe
not taken out of the Bible, in some versions it might still be in them, where ‘those that take oaths and wink’, you
find it in actually the Old Testament, ‘and shift their feet’… Because it’s a symbol
of the right angle, when you move your feet, you’re putting together a
right angle, things like that. Ancient,
still used today of course in Masonic rituals. It was actually
a warning about them, those who wink and shift their feet in certain
angles and so on. Then they talk about
the ephod, the ephod can mean a basket, but it can also mean an eye, a symbol
of an eye. All old stuff. Anyway, I did that years and years and years
ago. Maybe more than 20 years ago.
To show you that there’s definitely
organizations that come down through time that hide what
they’re up to from the general public.
And at every time, every stage in their evolution you might say, or
existence, because it’s heretical in all age and all types of cultures as
to what they’re up to. [Alan
chuckles.] Which
is the overthrow of the current systems, especially the established religious
orders, and in all cultures by the way, in order to
destroy it all and bring in their secular humanism with
themselves and selected people who have tested on IQ levels, no kidding you,
and those in academia and specialists and so on who rule over you.
That’s the perfect world that you find even in Things To Come,
the story of it from HG Wells who was into all this stuff, eugenics and
population control. And he hated the
rabble, the working-class rabble, etc. All
his kin did too, all his friends. And the agencies that he belonged too,
associations. So it’s never changed. They
have to get their goal through. Now, the organization
at the top already owns the financial systems of the world. That was one thing
they had to do was create a universal financial system, and central banks of
course. All the central banks now are connected to the World Bank, and the
International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements.
These were all set up from the one organization. They did set them all
up across the planet, same thing. Any country that wouldn’t go along with it
has recently been bombed out of existence. Because you must borrow, you must
borrow to be a part of the organization. And through the borrowing comes the
demands on payment and to get the
money that you’re trying to borrow for your nation, all the demands that you
must implement, social policies, which have caused even a bit of chaos in
Africa over the years when they start telling them what they have to
decriminalize, you might say, in their society and on sexual areas, all that
kind of stuff.
It’s no longer, and never really was, the idea of
we’ll just lend to people of different countries that don’t have much money.
No, no, it’s a social change policy
for those who don’t quite get it. And it’s directed from the West. The World
Bank of course even has ex prime ministers from Britain working in it now. So this
is their system of control. Ireland too is in the same boat, southern
Ireland. Because they were encouraged to borrow like crazy from the EU bank,
the central bank there, you see, knowing it was all going to collapse on them.
The guys knew years ago it was going to collapse because that was the plan. Then
they come in with the IMF branch to demand the payment and they take over your
system and they tell you how much you can spend on healthcare and all that kind
of stuff and all the cutbacks you’ve got have. Austerity, in other words, at
home, that’s what it’s going to be, and they dictate your social policies, you
see. Maggie Thatcher had them in, the IMF in helping run the country when she
was in office because of the massive debt they accumulated by different
governments before her too. So this is the system.
Now, it is a secretive society naturally at
the top. Because you’ll find out that none of the public voted for any of
it. Ever. You never got a chance to vote for any of it. The League of Nations
was set up as a form of word government, that was the agenda. HG Wells wrote
about it praising it, praising it saying that the
nation-state is dead and now we could have bureaucrats from the nation-state
directly working with the department’s in the League of Nations. Because
you would have the equivalent apartments in the League of Nations for
everything. But it didn’t quite pan out. People weren’t ready to give up their
sovereignty. So they had another world war.
And he said that, he says, we
need another war because they haven’t given up their sovereignty. So they use wars and everything to achieve many goals. And to take over much resources. Because the guys at the top of this organization do
believe they’ve got the right to manage all the resources, and even own the
resources of the planet. [Alan
chuckles.] And they do, pretty well, through wars and conquests. Nothing’s changed
there.
But anyway, they use the terminology of their
goals, the new secular world order,
and expert run world order. You’ll
find the same terminology in all their writings from the Fabian Society group,
which is just a branch of the Royal Institute of International Affairs. Whatever
your following out there, they run it. It doesn’t matter what side you think you’re on.
I’ve gone through in the last couple of weeks some about the Huxley’s,
George Orwell and Huxley, through the letters that they corresponded with between
each other. Because George Orwell that was living through an amazing time, the 1930s,
where literally everyone was so sick of this farce of either, a kind of
monarchical democracy, which is a farce in itself, they’re
completely opposing systems, can’t have both together. Which tells you that one
rules and the other one doesn’t, you know.
They were so sick of it, and the massive debts
from World War I, and the debts imposed
on certain countries because of World War I, that everything was falling apart. And it’s true, the Paris Treaty, where they,
and the Treaty of Versailles, basically the Warburgs
drafted up that Germany would have to continue to pay reparations to every nation, in other words, pay off
all their debts for the war to the year, I think it was 1979 and 1989. That’s
what they originally had a on the particular agreement. Well, it wasn’t an agreement because the
Germans weren’t asked to agree to it, I mean, they were just told. It was a complete farce.
Top reporters at the time for world newspapers
said that this will lead to another war. Because obviously Germany can’t afford
to pay off everybody’s debts. Nevermind
the fact that, believe you me, all the debt wasn’t incurred by the countries
just for the war either. It all went
into big, big pockets at the top.
Because we live in a crooked system.
But anyway, they’d have to fight their way out of it, they said, fight their way out or just get starved to
death and die. That’s exactly what they said.
I was reading a diplomat, his biography, he was a
Scots guy, but he was, he became really the top negotiator in the 1930s and 40s
and onwards, even up to the integration of the EU, part of that. But he was
picked because of his fluency in languages. They got him into the right
societies and of course the right oaths, etc. and so he knew the agenda. But it
was fascinating to read bits of his life because any big, big meeting at an
international level for foreign affairs, he was, they are in
charge of it generally for most of his life. It was astonishing to see
that, how they worked feverishly, never stopping, all the different
organizations, that you never vote for, to push their own agenda through for
leading to world government. The same
word government that Karl Marx talked about, a unified Europe, as a trading
block under a single parliament. And a
unified Americas under single a parliament. And that was discussed during the
NAFTA meetings, by the way, the last NAFTA meeting. Not the last ones, but the
ones quite a few years back. I kept the articles and I read it on the air when
I was on my radio show.
Anyway, Orwell’s idea was that this incredible
militarization during the 20s and 30s, because the governments were all falling
apart, and the nations were falling apart through poverty and reparations. And not just Germany, every country was pretty well. Britain
had massive taxation on the public because of the war debts. Because you always
pay for everything for the elites, you know. You pay for their costs. You put
railroads in across the world, as an empire. The public pay for all that. They staff it all. They pay for the armies
and so on. They get the bills for everything. But they get nothing back to actually save profit wise for themselves. But the ones at
the top certainly do, this oligarchy they call it, whatever it is that runs
your government, above the government
of course naturally. And that’s how it
is.
So Orwell brought 1984 out, published I think 1947, 1948. In it, it was mainly
because at that time the Soviet system, the Soviet system really was a test, it
was ‘the second experiment’ they called it, the great experiment. The first one
was ‘the American experiment’ to see if they could govern themselves, the
general people that is, the public. That was the idea behind it. And if they
couldn’t, then a society that formed would rule them secretly from behind, you
might say or above them. They wouldn’t know it, they’d still think it was the
same kind of government if they failed to manage to look after themselves.
Well, it’s easy to destroy a culture so they
can’t look after themselves and point to all the problems they’ve got and say,
well, see, see, see. And then they start appointing agencies to manage you. So
they end up in the same, eventually they end up the same way as the Soviet
Union. What we’re living through today is actually the
proper Soviet, you might call it. Because
they ironed out all the problems by observing all the things that went wrong
the first time with the Russian one, the Soviet Union.
Remember, Soviet means ‘ruled by councils’. And their theory, which never worked out, but the
theory was that you could bring in a system where all departments for labor
would have their own counsel, their own panel to run it, you see. And all kind
of unions would have their own governments as well. So Soviet means ‘ruled by councils’. But in reality, in the Soviet system, naturally, the head
couldn’t have any competition, so they appointed the heads of the councils that
were all party members and were bought and paid for very, very well. That’s
human nature unfortunately everywhere, it’s too easy to bribe folk off.
I’ve seen it happen in all countries actually, bribes
getting put across. So there’s no
shortage of folk who will take the money in the bribes, and really, do the
dirty on their fellows, the ones exempt from it.
You’ll find too that, you see the Soviet system
was to be, to use science. They couldn’t ever get to that stage, but to use
science and proper scientific indoctrination in Pavlovian style, conditioned
responses and all the rest of it, where they’d all feel guilty when they were
told to feel guilty, even if they’d done nothing wrong. If you were to say counterrevolutionary to anybody, anybody, immediately they’d go into
almost a paroxysm of it, and turn all kind of colors, it was instilled in them,
they’re terrified of it. So language is very important. That’s why they
use language now, and we’ve got language police in North America and across
Europe where now you’re getting forbidden to say certain things, the same
thing. It’s all Orwellian. Orwell’s saw all this happening in his day. And so
he saw this stage, at least for 1984,
a stage where you would have the spy system, everyone would get monitored,
spied upon constantly.
As it got more and more authoritarian
they would demand that you turn up for, and I mentioned this before, you will eventually have to turn up for your
community meetings and community parades and community this and community that.
That you will eventually and if you’re not there you will get a knock on the
door and you’ll get dragged out or fined or something. That will come in this
system, that’s part of the system that were going through right now. There’s no
doubt about it. In Britain, the police are contacting people who’ve used words
they’re not supposed to use anymore and they’re getting warned about it. So they’re giving you a warning now. Well, that’s
a threat, you see, your government agencies are threatening people. So you’re
already under tyranny obviously. And it’s not going to stop there.
It’s not to stop there because you see, your
idea of freedoms are all delusions. Complete delusions. You really haven’t
had them. You really haven’t. Because most of the things you do and say
already, they were given to you to say and do. [Alan chuckles.] There’s nothing
out there, there’s not a movement out there that doesn’t have leaders that
are supplied to you. Believe you me. That’s how, that’s why the system has
never failed. It’s never fallen apart.
But if you go into this for instance, here’s an example. World government, ‘eh? There’s so, so many articles, even from
government’s websites themselves, about world order, like, a new world order, a
new world order, all that stuff, the stuff the general public
will laugh at because you say it. You
get it from the government websites themselves and articles.
But also, world government, ha, ha, ha, we’re
probably talking about world government, hey.
Well, the Carnegie Council, these big, big foundations that run the thousands
of nongovernmental organizations, that manage you all, that’s the Soviet
system. That’s the new Soviet, you see, the perfect Soviet. You don’t elect
them. They all have the same goals in
mind, but they have specialized parts of their agenda for themselves. They’re all funded by and paid for it and
even have pension plans by the big foundations, tax-free foundations, for the
Carnegie and Rockefeller, and many others, there’s stacks of them out there. Because
it’s one big club, one big club across the planet. And they have…
The Resurgent Idea of World Government - Ethics & International Affairs, Volume 22.2 (Summer 2008) - carnegiecouncil.org / 7 July 2008
Oh, conspiracy theory. Whereas it’s from the Carnegie Council
publication. It’s all there, you see, so
they have an idea of world government, you see, it’s maybe time for it. You find the Financial Times had it in it
too…
And Now for a World Government - ft.com / 8 Dec 2008
And you’ve got Foreign Affairs, world government
and …
The Illusion of World Government - foreignaffairs.com / April 1949
Talking about they’ve not achieve the goal yet,
there’s just too many little arguments they’re having to have the world
government. So here it all is, ‘eh, from their own websites, world government,
world government. You’re used to, you’ve
been used to for quite a few years governance,
world governance. Meaning, oh that’s
not the same thing. Well, of course is the same thing. You
don’t even need a building for world government. You just need to have
organizations all working together, especially now, with the Internet, and
ruling your life, quite easily. Quite
simple, isn’t it.
It’s well on the way of what they want at the
top. And it’s always been this agenda, always the goal of taking over the
resources of the whole planet, running it properly. What they actually say is, finishing
the creation of the builders. So, they’re the builders, they say, that take
the material that was left unfinished and it’s their job to complete it and
perfect it all. So they have symbology of the Tower of Babel of course.
Tower of Babel E.U. Parliament Building, Strasbourg - youtube.com / 22 Mar 2016
And of course, we also know that’s one of the
main buildings they rebuilt, [Alan chuckles.] the ruined tower, for their
annual EU meetings of course. Or, actually, they have
it about three or four times a year at that
particular building. It’s very symbolic. I mean, you couldn’t get more
symbolic than that, could you. But it’s also the world itself, this deity
left the world unfinished. He didn’t perfect man. Or maybe he made him immortal but then he
changed his mind with the curse basically, you see. But anyway, they claim the
world was left imperfect. And so, they
want control of the weather. Control of everything. Control of the general
population. Control of the numbers of the populace. Control of what they’ll need, and the
elimination of that which they don’t need. That’s basically eugenics right
straight there, you see. It’s all right there, there’s nothing to guess out at
all.
The same organization, that runs every other
major organization, they created, this one organization did create the United
Nations out of the League of Nations. They still want that to be a world
government. They created the World Bank.
They created the IMMF, the Bank for International Settlements, across
the whole planet. And basically, they’re privately owned banks, but funded by
us. How is that again? We pay for everything, this public-private idea, they
take all the profits from everything. Because it’s their right to do so because
they rule the world, you see. And you
don’t vote for them. We’ve got no votes to create the United Nations. We got no votes from the public. Nevermind the wars they give you. You ever
get a vote for war, do you want to go to war? No, of
course you don’t get that. Never will either.
Because the wars have different functions than
the ones you’re trained to think that they have. As I
say, HG Wells mentioned one of them and that was to bring every country to its
knees through mass slaughter, so we’re so fatigued
and terrified and horrified of the mass slaughter, and fatigue at the rationing
that will come out of it and half starved, which happened by the way, that in
came the United Nations at the end of World War II. And they had all these articles, you see the
old articles, old newspapers and so on, where they were planning to just
establish themselves as a world government. But they still didn’t get to it, there was too much opposition from the
general populace. And Wells said, again,
they need another war to bring them to
their knees, on behalf of the Fabian Society and the elitists that he
worked with.
But Barry Goldwater also talked about it. And he himself was a senator for, whoa, most
of his life, I think. And like all politicians, there’s corruption, you can’t
touch politics without corruption. So, I don’t trust any of them. At the end of
his time, once he retired from it, he became left-wing and went along with all
the left-wing agenda. All of it. You
know, all the taboo things at one time, he went along with them eventually.
Rather strange if you really have any principles. But he did say, he talked
about the Trilateral Commission, which is a specialized branch that came out
of the Council on Foreign Relations, this big branch that runs most of the
world now. It’s parent company in Britain, which is the Royal Institute of
International Affairs, that used to be called the Lord Alfred Milner group.
Because they ran the Empire, this group, the secretive group, when there was an
empire there.
Then they passed the torch to America with the
bigger tax base. They had already plundered Britain until they were
impoverished and malnourished with wars and rationing right up into the 1950s,
until most of the population, the working-class had rickets and goodness knows
what else, you know. I’m not kidding
you. Then they passed the torch to
America with the bigger tax base, now that they had created a tax base in America.
That was all done with the establishment of the Federal Reserve in 1913,
all getting set up for World War I coming along, and
along with it came the right to tax the public, you see. So, they could borrow
whatever they wanted from these private bankers and private banks and then the
taxpayer would have to pay it all off, all the debt. That’s the example they’ve
taken across the whole planet, starting in London, to America, and across the
whole planet. The same organization.
Goldwater did say in his book, With No Apologies, he said the
Trilateral Commission that really broke out into existence to the general public when Jimmy Carter came in, he was surrounded
by them for the first time, and people said, well, who are these Trilateral
groups, what is this commission? This private group, again. It was a private, they’re all private clubs.
The CFR, you don’t vote any of them in for anything but they’re running
everything. The Trilateral Commission really is the technocrats that are
just placed everywhere to actually get jobs done. Whether they’re are
elected or not, they’re just appointed everywhere across the world, including
the central banks. Two of them were appointed to look after Italy when they
bankrupted Italy. Another one for Greece.
Amazing, hey.
So they can override every country’s,
or at least what they, they’re not supposed to, but they simply do. I mean,
who’s going to stop them? They’re appointed to take over your country when
you’re bankrupt. Again, by the same
banks that they work for. They’re the movers and shakers. They’re ex-prime
ministers, ex-presidents belong to it. Bush Senior was one. And they’re not beholding to the public for
anything. Anyway, here’s what Goldwater said in the book. He says…
Barry Goldwater (1909-1998) US Senator (R-Arizona) in his book "With No Apologies"
“The Trilateralist Commission is international...(and)...is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States.”
(Alan: …by seizing control of
the political government of the United States.
Hm. Is there some part of that
you don’t understand there? You don’t
elect these people, they’re appointed. Everywhere. Until they are running your
governments. And they are in all parties. Because the parties are all a
joke. Anyway, he says…)
“In my view, the trilateral commission represents a skillful and concerted effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power - political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical.”
“The commission emphasizes the necessity of eliminating artificial barriers to world commerce. (A: That’s taxes and trade all the rest of it and import duties.) What it proposes as substitute is an international economy managed and controlled by international monetary groups through the mechanism of international conglomerate manufacturing and business enterprises.”
(A: What he’s talking about here is what Quigley talked about, a new feudal system basically run by corporate CEOs, etc, hm. This is, I think 1979 that Goldwater wrote that.)
Freedom, spiritual,
political, economic is denied any importance in the trilateral construction of
the next century. (A: That’s the one we’re living
in now. So remember, this is written about 1979. So…)
Freedom – spiritual, political, economic – is denied any importance in the trilateral construction of the next century. What the Trilateral’s truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political power of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system, they will rule the future.
(A: Rule the world basically,
always the old, old agenda. Hm.)
But of
course, I should say this is my own words, but once they’ve done all that,
which they’ve pretty well done, that’s what the whole
free-trade system is about, that’s why they get the GATT treaty on steroids and
brought China up and made them the manufacturers for the planet. China didn’t
do it themselves. So, there you go.
And the ‘overwhelming
existing differences with abundant materialism’… So, materialism would put
you all to sleep basically. If you tie that in with the lectures and the
talks that Aldous Huxley gave where he said that, you know, the people would be
willing slaves basically, kind of happy slaves, contented slaves. And it’s
through materialism, you see, shop-till-you-drop, etc,
credit cards, blah blah blah blah blah.
And once they change and start withdrawing the surplus from the
materialistic system and bring you into austerity, you’ll still go along with
their system. As long as you get little freebies here and there and little
cheap things here and there too you’ll still go along
with it. But in the process initially
there’ll be no complaining at all, as they take all your rights away from you.
That’s already happened. Basically. So the last part, again…
Freedom – spiritual, political, economic – is denied any . . .
So you have
no economic freedom, right, for anybody or any nation eventually. Or political
system different from the universal one they’re bringing in. And the spiritual
one, they’re going to have no, no credence to any particular
religion eventually. They’ll use them, they’ll use different ones to
be the top, top ones, that will appear to be the top ruling religions for a
period and then destroy them, naturally. Because this system has destroyed the
religions of the West quite successfully, didn’t it? They brought in the sex, sex, sex, sexual
revolution, right. In the 1960s they
brought in abortion for everybody so don’t worry about the fallout from the sex,
you see, the state will take care of it. Until marriage, one of the goals, the
goals… Isn’t this strange? You think
it’s strange, it’s not strange at all, that the goal of Marxism was the
destruction of the family unit. Hm.
And for most
folk eventually the destruction of private property. Read Agenda 21 for
private property, folks, the agenda for the whole 21st century,
hm. The 2030 is just parts of it,
segments of it, as they go through it and what they must achieve. But the thing
for the whole 21st century has all of that in it too, hm. It’s all
on track for this new improved system.
The same
thing will happen even with Islam too, down the road, that’s what they hope
for. Because once a culture that’s had
so many taboos about certain things, for, to restrain themselves into a
workable society, and you bring them into the West… And if they can keep that going, the
massive deluge of sexual images you’re deluged with from childhood right
through on television and movies and everything, you know, that will work with
everybody, it doesn’t matter who they are, until they fall apart too.
So again,
like the old song of the Rolling Stones and tribute to the devil basically, Time Is On My Side.
They don’t care if it takes them 20 years or 30 years or 40 to bring a
particular people down. It will be
interesting to see if Islam can, will really push against all that stuff and
try to keep the family unit intact and the systems intact. Or will they, I
think already a lot of the young guys are already falling into the temptations
and it’s been well noticed by those, by their elders.
But we’re living
through this massive system of incredible control. We really are. And the West
has been through all the different revolutions thinking it was all fun. Isn’t
it amazing how they, how it’s all fun,
you know, in the 60s, yeah, just do it,
yeah, take drugs, do it and have fun, fun.
Yeah… as they destroyed it all. And here you are, folk can’t even
get a friend for more than a month or two, you know. The genders are all
screwed up with the relationships because they can’t get anybody to stay with
them pretty well. Or if they initially do, they’ll get
bored with them, if they keep watching television and movies, their whole
job is to make you unhappy with what you have. [Alan chuckles.] It’s a war strategy, you see. Most war strategies and revolutions are bloodless. But incredibly effective.
Anyway,
that’s what Goldwater said in I think 1979. So, the Trilateral Commission place
all these technocrats in all these positions of control. They’re not
responsible to the general public or to complaints of
the general public. They do what they plan to do, then they get on with it, they’re
not answerable to the public. Maggie Thatcher
said that, that she was in, once she retired, she said, she now belonged to a group, and she was talking about the
group, same group actually in Britain under the Royal
Institute of International Affairs group.
And she says, I know all the ex
prime ministers and presidents across the world and top bureaucrats basically,
and says, we can get things done without
being responsible to the public. There you go.
You get all
the clues all the time and folk miss it because you are trained to be a child and to stay a child and to
leave your thinking to what you’re trained to think of as your betters, these
special names and special people on television that speak with authority, you know, and they’re built
up like superstars and they speak with authority. That’s why they kept anchor
men and women on television for their entire lives, as they were falling off
the chairs as geriatrics. Because people grew up with them. It was so evident in the US. And Britain was
the same. There was a particular guy in Britain who spent his life in the BBC,
and anything important that ever happened in that whole time he was the one to
tell you in a stern way what was happening, in an official manner. It was like his law.
You had the
same thing in the US too. Of course, in
the US they were all members of the World Federalist Society, these characters.
And, that’s just the way it is, you
know, the ones they gave you your news, that’s
the way it is. Yeah, all in it for an agenda the public were completely
ignorant of, but the public would take their opinions, that were given to them
and just parrot them without thinking. Who would lie to you? I mean, how trusting a child are you? Have
you looked at the history of the world? And of every nation? The histories?
They’re all so similar. It’s
astonishing.
And I’m
prattling on too much because the time just runs out here. And I’ll have shoveling snow to do shortly. I’ve just put up the one on world government,
some of the links for world government from the official sites, from government
themselves. [Alan chuckles.] And we can have all that there too.
Also too,
they give you your superstars. I can remember it was one of the Brandt guys who
was targeted by the Unabomber, and the Unabomber mentioned, really, why he was
targeting this particular group. This is part of the group that
was bringing you the new culture. They worked with the CIA. The
guy Brandt, he said in one of his talks that part of his job was to make
scientists, the ones who would lead you, into superstars, so you’d follow them and you’d follow their opinions. Can you think of any
today? Of course you do. These guys
make, it’s the same machinery of making a nobody into a pop star or rock star
or whatever, the same thing. Zuckerberg,
another one too. Oh yeah, he just… [Alan
chuckles.] …a front man.
Zuckerberg outlines 'privacy-focused Vision - dailymail.co.uk / 6 Mar 2019
That’s to do
with all the, well, anybody who still uses what they give you, you know, you
know what they’re doing. Do you want
your little child monitored by big brother? That is your right to do so. And also, last week I think or the week before I mentioned
too, it says…
Deepfakes explained: How technology is masking reality
ctvnews.ca / 23 Feb 2019
The scope of high-tech deception keeps growing and experts say deepfakes could become the biggest threat to truth.
A deepfake is when an AI (A: …artificial intelligence…) algorithm -- a neural network -- generates a video that never happened (A: …it never happened…) by either swapping one face for another or by allowing someone's motions and voice to be mapped onto another person.
"It's a video that has been created by essentially feeding in a computer algorithm lots of images of a person," said Andy Grotto, a national security expert and professor at Stanford University.
"It could be video, it could even be audio, and you feed it enough of that content and over time the algorithm learns how to mimic that content."
The technology that powers deepfakes is only growing more sophisticated.
(A: They give you examples of where it is now.)
Initially, the videos weren't perfect. Early deepfake videos looked obviously doctored. But BuzzFeed produced a frighteningly realistic example last year by having actor and director Jordan Peele make a PSA about deepfakes as former U.S. president Barrack Obama.
It goes on
and on and on. To show you this is how they’re going to give you the fake
trials that are going to come down the road when, did you say something!? Like it was in 1984 where you’re pulled into the Ministry of Truth, you know, and
the Ministry of Love will ask you all the questions as they torture you. We’re
here, folks! And then they’ll bring out
the deepfake’s and say, this is a video of you saying that I’ve been here or
saying that or whatever. And the public will go along with it because the authorities said it, the authorities said it. Quite something.
Quite easy, isn’t it?
To do with
eugenics too, now, don’t think that China, as I said before, does things by
itself. It was created by the West, the
same group that runs and owns the West now, the same uniform system. And
really, China is their shining example of the perfectly ordered socialist
system, run scientifically. The West
helped them and set it all up and given the expertise and the money. We even put our factories over there. We paid
for our factories to be uprooted, dismantled and put over there under the free
trade agreement. And we lost all the jobs at home. Nobody was given a vote on that. Just these
technocrats, again, and your governments all signed on to it and that’s it.
They never ask your opinion for anything that matters, folks. Never will be
either.
So…
Chinese government may have funded disgraced scientist He Jiankui to
create the world's first gene-edited babies, report claims
dailymail.co.uk / 26 Feb 2019
Documents seen by medical news site STAT suggest that Chinese scientist He Jiankui may have received money from three separate government institutions in China.
Now, China’s
not the only country, every country’s
been doing this gene editing. India’s been doing it for quite, quite some time actually and they’ve had documentaries on the TV
years ago on that, where they actually talk to some people who had their babies
designed basically, genes removed and other ones replaced, etc., for
height, for looks, etc. It’s odd too, the different cultures of what they go
for first, whether it’s high, high, high intellect or looks, etc., or height,
you know. It’s quite interesting to see
what they go for. But every country’s been doing this. And every nation, because they had articles
years ago in all the top magazines and newspapers about the British, and then
the US military especially, making the new robotic type soldiers, that
we basically cloned. So, don’t think that by some silly little bit of
paper that they’ve all signed that they don’t do it. Of course they do it. The
same with biological warfare, it never stopped with all the treaties. Never did. So, you can’t blame China. And
it’s interesting, though, that they put it across there, making you, getting
used to the idea that this is coming.
Just like I’ve said before, like the movie Gattaca
with the expertly run society of course.
You’ll find the trained front people, and
they really do, they pick them as children and train them for positions of
leadership. You’ll find the big NGOs have ads
about that and they’ll say in they’re ‘about’ thing and ‘what they’re up to’
and so on, they tell you they’ll pick youngsters with the aptitudes and train
them for positions of power and leadership. They all do that. So, so much for spontaneous people appearing,
who just appear out of nowhere. No, these people are all trained and selected.
And they are devoted, believe you me,
to the agenda because that’s all that’s been drummed into them their whole
lives long. And they’re well rewarded for it, as they mislead you and lead you
up the garden path. All of them do that.
So, you don’t have a free society. You
never get anybody who’s genuine who’s going to talk for you. It ain’t going to
happen, folks. No way.
I mentioned
last week too about Ocasio-Cortez, the so-called Democrat who came out as they
put her up to be a star, the star machinery again, a little nobody, who, oh, is
it legitimate it’s for young people to ask if it’s okay to have children, you
see.
Ocasio-Cortez Poses ‘Legitimate’ Question: ‘Is It Okay to Still Have Children?’ - freebeacon.com / 25 Feb 2019
Because you
see, don’t forget that they floated the idea too in all their socialistic
meetings for well over 150 years, about limiting the people having children.
And using the China model. But also, before even the China model came along in
fact, when they were still not communists, they were pushing the same idea in
the late 1800s in Britain and into the early 1900s George Bernard Shaw said the
same thing, he was all for it. He says, we’ll
decide if you can have children or not, according to your IQ level, etc.
That’s all part of it, folks.
Breed out
all the bad folk, all the general public, you see, the commoners. Because
they’re awfully snobbish, believe you me.
The Democrats, liberals and conservatives,
they’re awfully snobbish at the very, very top. They all are. Because they all
belong to the same clique. They don’t send their children to ordinary schools
either, folks. It doesn’t matter if they pretend to speak for the working
classes. It’s like Britain, none of them, none of the ones that are pushing and
telling you that the education system is fantastic in ordinary schools in
Britain, none of them send their children to them. All the politicians for
Labour I think are at all the best private schools. Because [Alan chuckles.]
you know, they’re going to make sure their children are going to be the
winners. Of course they are. The big agenda’s on
the go. But they give you the leaders. They certainly do.
When I was
going through the eugenics movement, about Julian Huxley for instance, a big
player in it, a big player. Incredible, the man was an incredible… He voiced
everything I’m saying here, openly in
his big speeches. Eventually he was up there with Planned Parenthood of course
and he was a member of UNESCO, the head of it for a while, to create a common
culture by indoctrination of children across the world. That’s how you do it.
You’re given the topics, you brainwash it into them, oh, the sky is falling, too many people, oh sustainability, yada, yada,
yada, going way back to the early 1900s, folks. It’s nothing new.
And at the
same time, about 1950 and so on, they set up all the ecological organizations,
as far back, and at the same time that Julian Huxley,
he was involved in them all. That’s the one that eventually uses the big stick,
oh we’re destroying the world, Gaia will
kick back at you and it would just shake itself, and you’ll all die because
you’ve mistreated her, you see.
They’ve tried everything they can. So, sustainability and the sky is falling is
the one they chose and they’ve stuck to. Now it’s their religious mantra.
Basically, they’ve trained a generation of children to quote the mantra. What was it that Lenin said? We shall win by slogans. Slogans about
it all the time. Look at these rallies, dit-dit-dit, dit-dit-dit, their
slogans, that’s what they, you know, it’s literally a three worded slogan, it’s
repeated over, dit-dit-dit, dit-dit-dit.
Yep. Just like Orwell said, four legs good, two legs bad. M-hm. Mind
you, today I guess you can have as many legs as you want, it’s your choice to
do so.
But it says
here…
Ecological Society of America
en.wikipedia.org
(A: It really started in Britain too, you see. They’ve got a branch in every country now.)
The Ecological Society of America (ESA) is a professional organization of ecological scientists. Based in the United States and founded in 1915, ESA publications include peer-reviewed journals, newsletters, fact sheets, and teaching resources. It holds an annual meeting at different locations in the USA and Canada. In addition to its publications and annual meeting, ESA is engaged in public policy, (A: Do you vote for them? No, you don’t. Of course not.) science, education and diversity issues. (A: Isn’t that interesting?)
ESA's 10,000 members are researchers, educators, natural resource managers, and students in over 90 countries. Members work on a wide range of topics, from agroecology (A: That’s all your food supply.) to marine diversity and explore the relationships between organisms and their past, present, and future environments. (A: You have to understand what they mean by organisms and their past, present and future environments. That’s a topic in itself, that they’re all brainwashed into, all these organizations are. And eugenics too.) The Society has over 20 topical sections and seven regional chapters.
That’s quite
interesting, as I say, the people who are all members of it, and at the
beginning, etc. You’ll find in the branches in Britain for these organizations,
they shared the same offices in London at one point for most of them. You find
that Julian Huxley was up there as members of them, of the boards
actually. It’s quite fascinating how sustainability, eugenics, etc. are
all tied together, in this one organization’s mindset, that rules the world and
where they’re going with it all too.
You’ll find…
The Rockefeller Foundation's Molecular Vision of Life - How the Aims of
Eugenics, Social Control, and Human Engineering Shaped Molecular Biology and
20th Century Science
A Review of Lily E. Kay's The Molecular Vision of Life: Caltech, The Rockefeller Foundation, and the Rise of the New Biology (Oxford University Press, 1993)
cholesterol-and-health.com / 16 Jan 2009
Getting back
to this molecular vision of life, how the aims of eugenics social control
and human engineering shaped molecular biology in 20th century
science. It’s interesting. But you have to understand what they’re talking about, the molecular
vision of life, and how it all ties in with eugenics. And how the Rockefellers
literally funded it all and put it through Caltech. It says, the
rise of the new biology, of how you would now look at humans and everything
else and your place in the world. It’s like a species, like any bacterium in a
sense, and how you can manipulate it all. Control, that was function of it, of
training so the people would believe it all, and it would give them social
control and they can go into human engineering by teaching them a kind of slanted
version and a way to look at society and people as molecular constructs rather
than actual complete human beings. It’s
quite fascinating to me anyway. It might bore you, but it’s fascinating to me.
And Julian
Huxley, it’s astonishing all the things he’s been involved in. Absolutely.
‘Julian Huxley and the Continuity of Eugenics in Twentieth-century
Britain’
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
(A: Very good article.)
The life and ideas of Julian Sorrell Huxley (1887-1975) represent not only considerable contributions to evolutionary theory but also to eugenic thought and social planning. (A: I haven’t mentioned anything about, yeah, if he was elected to anything by the public.) Huxley’s career history was complex and disjointed making him an international and very much a public figure. (A: They made a star of him too. The same thing, standard machinery.) This paper sees Huxley’s peripatetic career as linked to ideological agendas, not least of “a new world order”. The problems addressed here are, first, the extent of continuities in eugenic commitments from his interwar views and, second, to determine the contours of Huxley’s post-Second World War eugenic thinking. Huxley emerges as a crucial bridging figure from what has been referred to as “old eugenics”. . .
(A: …up to Germany and Nazis using it in World War II, and they copied it all from the West by the way, and especially from America. [Alan chuckles.] They got slammed for that. So Julian Huxley reinvented it, you see. Under different terminology he kept it alive and well. And was all for the phasing out, he wanted to breed only the well-to-do upper-middle-class types, and to gradually cull off basically in one way or another all the rest of the public that they didn’t need anymore. This guy, his testbed was the British public. Don’t think these people ever stand for you and see and relate to you as their own. They do NOT do that. Never have done that, folks. Never have. Never have. But it’s quite an interesting little article, and of course they don’t condemn the guy either. If anything, they make excuses for him. But it’s interesting to see them, they go into the Galton Club formed at the college, you know, at Oxford.)
. . . a Galton Club
was formed at the College, and further debates took place at the Oxford Union.
From 1919 until 1925 Huxley was Fellow at New College, and the population
geneticist J.B.S. Haldane (Huxley’s former “fag” (A: …they call it…) at Eton)
was Fellow from 1919 until 1922. Huxley’s students included the cytologist and contraception
pioneer J.R. Baker who was undergraduate at New College from 1919-22, and the population
geneticist E.B. (“Henry”) Ford. These bio-social theorists represented a
political spectrum from Haldane on the extreme left to
Ford and (a later Oxford recruit) the botanist Darlington on the extreme right:
they all continued to exert influence on questions of biology and society on
into the 1960s. (A: Actually, beyond that too.)
So these
movements with their philosophies are a very old agenda, folks, very old
agenda. And it’s still going on today.
Bertrand Russell of course was a good friend of them all and worked with them
too. He was quite blatant about them, by the use of diet, injections
and injunctions we can reduce the population. Russell also said you could really dumb the
people down when you’re doing all that too. He was quite,
quite blatant about it, through the same kind of methods as well apart from
just bumping them off. It’s really
fascinating to see different characters involved in this and their complete
connection. How they even use by the way, and Julian Huxley did it too, they
come in as supposed zoologist. They
start talking about wildlife to get all the young children on board and do all
the talks on wildlife and their little furry animals and stuff. And you don’t
realize you’re getting brainwashed as a child into, well, I guess that applies to people too, you know, if there’s too many
you must cull them off. Every
country’s been given their favorite zoologist who all talk about the same
things, and too many of this population
and too many of that, and then eventually as they get older, they start talking
about too many of you. [Alan chuckles.] There you go.
Political and Economic Planning
en.wikipedia.org
(A: There’s another one, a PEP group as well, to do with eugenics in Britain that Julian Huxley was involved in. All the top ones were too.)
Political and Economic Planning (PEP) was a British policy think tank, formed in 1931 in response to Max Nicholson's article A National Plan for Britain (A: …national plan for Britain… eugenics, right…) published in February of that year in Gerald Barry's magazine The Week-End Review.
The original members included (A: This is a private organization, again, right, that belong to all the other top organizations…) Nicholson and Barry, the zoologist Julian Huxley, the agronomist Leonard Elmhirst, the financier Basil Phillott Blackett, the civil servants Dennis Routh and Sir Henry Bunbury, the research chemist Michael Zvegintzov, and Israel Sieff, a director of Marks & Spencer. Sieff was Chairman in the 1930s, followed by Elmhirst in 1939 and by Nicholson in 1953. It was a non-governmental planning organisation financed by corporations. (A: …to do with eugenics on the general public, folks, and too many of them, etc.)
This prolific organisation was influential in the formation of (A: Guess what?...) The National Health Service, . . .
(A: So, they helped draft up
stuff long before came in, right. But remember, the National Health Service, to
the general public, now it’s just like today with all the cheaper goods from
China, oh wow, it’s great, you know. What’s the real motive of it all? I’ve
already read it to you. I don’t want to
overwhelm you with, oh, it’s fantastic… as they start taking rights away from
you. Oh well, we’ve still got all this free stuff and cheap stuff and you know...
There’s always an, oh well, so what. And as I say, with National Health Service,
don’t forget the agenda of the eugenicists was to bring down the
population. [Alan laughing.] By all means possible.
And what’s their favorite technique? Even Ronald Reagan talked about it, the
most fearful thing the citizens can hear is from officials coming to the door
saying, we’re from the government and
we’re here to help you. Because
you’d better be on guard.)
(A: The National Health Service,
inoculations, and in no time at all, within a span of maybe, you know, less,
under 20 years, they were doing abortions, the National Health Service in
Britain. So again, eugenics, depopulate,
etc., yada, yada, ya. And once you have a National Health Service then you
simply have your abortion days. And they do have abortion days, every hospital
over in Britain has them, that’s all they do, you know. And they couldn’t do
that without having a National Health Service.
And now with the National Health Service they don’t have the money, they’ve
got lots to do with all kinds of strange things, the National Health Service,
and strange operations and stuff, but for really essential
things they claim that they’re broke.)
(A: So you’ve got to say, well
why isn’t it doing the main things it was really, that you thought it was
designed to do in the first place? Well, maybe you thought it was designed for
something else in the first place. They always give you candy to begin with,
right? And then they substitute the
candy for something else as time goes on.)
. . . War II and post-war planning, and the development of the African colonies.
(A: …as well. They were heavily involved in programs for the African colonies.)
After the war it shared the offices of (A: …listen…) The Nature Conservancy in Belgrave Square, London, . . .
(A: Right. So here is the Eugenics Society and National Political
and Economic Planning committee, all private, all private NGOs, hm, that formed
for themselves, on behalf of the real rulers of the world of course, with financiers
and everything there and bankers and everything there, right, and it says
here…)
This prolific organisation was influential in the formation of The National Health Service, War II and post-war planning, and the development of the African colonies. After the war it shared the offices of The Nature Conservancy in Belgrave Square, London, producing reports such as Opportunities in Industry (1957) and Advisory Committees in British Government (1960)
(A: So here again, advisory committees, you see. What do you think the Council on Foreign Relations is? It says on their website, advisory committee, they advise governments. Well, do you elect them to advise government? No, you don’t. No.)
In 1978 PEP merged
with the Centre for the Study of Social Policy (CSSP), (A:
You see. Now, social policy
covers everything, folks.) And became the Policy Studies Institute
(PSI). (A: Isn’t that is interesting,
‘eh?)
(A: …advise governments on
social policy. You vote them in?
No. Nope. Not at all.)
(A: But it’s got, as I say, a
research chemist. Interesting, a chemist, hey, was on the panel of the first
board. Civil servants…)
The original members included Nicholson and Barry, the zoologist Julian Huxley, the agronomist Leonard Elmhirst, the financier Basil Phillott Blackett,
the civil servants Dennis Routh and Sir Henry Bunbury, the research chemist Michael Zvegintzov, and Israel Sieff, a director of Marks & Spencer.
(A: The zoologists were members
of it too. Again, eugenics, you see.
They used animal behavior, but really to apply to humans, study
them. Because humans, they say, are
animals, you see.)
Anyways,
Julian Huxley, remember, who said himself that their job at UNESCO, he said in
a speech, was to knock man off his
stool, you know, his high stool
as the supreme being on the planet, and they would train the public that you’re
just another creature, and maybe an inferior creature. You see what I’m
saying? This was the whole agenda here. And when you look at all these
characters that are into it, with ecology, sustainability, too many of you the
wrong kind of people etc. etc… And here’s what the Nature
Conservancy, you see, that they are allied with, right…
The Nature Conservancy
en.wikipedia.org
The Nature Conservancy (TNC) is a charitable environmental organization, headquartered (A: …for the US…) in Arlington, Virginia, United States.
(A: Is there anything else in Arlington, Virginia, folks? Do you think? M-hm. A massive charitable environmental organization… Hm… )
Its mission is to "conserve the lands and waters on which all life depends." (A: Interesting, ‘eh.) The Conservancy pursues non confrontational, pragmatic solutions (A: They mean, brainwashing the children…) to conservation's challenges working with partners including indigenous communities, businesses, governments, multilateral institutions, and other non-profits.
(A: Well, did you get a vote on that? Oh, no. It’s interesting to even just read that kind of stuff here…)
The Nature Conservancy now impacts conservation in 72 countries, including all 50 states of the United States.
(A: Most of the folk wouldn’t
even know that themselves.)
The Conservancy has over one million members, and has protected more than 119,000,000 acres (48,000,000 ha) of land and thousands of miles of rivers worldwide. The Nature Conservancy also operates more than 100 marine conservation projects globally. The organization's assets total $6.71 billion as of 2015. The Nature Conservancy is the largest environmental nonprofit by assets and by revenue in the Americas.
Interesting,
‘eh. And they’re into landgrab’s all over the place too under the guise of
conservation. I’ve given the talks about the Duke of Edinburgh, Prince Philip,
oh, he’s the head of so many organizations in the past. He’s given profound
statements, right in your, I mean, there’s nothing hidden about this guy, he
runs all these different world wildlife funds and all the rest of it, too many people, when there’s too many animals
you have to cull them all off, and really, you have to look at people much the same way, etc. etc. etc.
One of his main speeches in Switzerland he talked like that, in fact, quite
openly about it. So, all these conservation things are really
very false. They have a mission, and so much of the best farming
territory across Africa and so on, belong to the world wildlife fund and all the
other organizations he’s head of. It’s the best farming areas. They can’t allow
folk in to farm. It’ll be the same
elsewhere too, folks. Interesting, ‘eh.? Also I’ll put up…
World Government Summit
un.org / 13 Feb 2017
Opening remarks at the World Government Summit
António Guterres
World Government
Summit. That’s the guy they put in charge of, I think
it was the United Nations eventually. And they have the same speeches too when
they go to the World Economic Forum.
Again,
getting back to Facebook, how they’re basically going to give you no privacy.
Facebook Reveals Its Privacy-Focused Vision For
Social Networking
Facebook.com
(A: …privacy focused vision, which you can reverse that if you want. But if you never learn folks, it’s your own fault. Hm?)
And confirms that What’s App and Messenger and Insta Gram messaging will be merged on a single platform.
Well, there
you go. Do you really think they’re different private organizations out there
running it all? It’s one massive organization with many
faces, with the Internet.
Hhhhh.
And as you
watch, now, I sometimes read a story just to give you a little start and shock into life, ‘eh.
Real-life child-snatcher reveals how she is paid £15 per abduction by
Philippine gangs who set her a quota of two a week and sell them to paedophiles
with prices determined by their looks
dailymail.co.uk / 28 Feb 2019
(A: This is one person who was
caught, right, in the Philippines. £15 per abduction, that’s a lot of money for
the Philippines.)
A female kidnapper has revealed sickening details of how gangs abduct children in the Philippines to sell to foreign paedophiles - with bonuses for how pretty they are.
Lilibeth Bustamante was caught trying to walk away with a ten-year-old girl in Paranaque City on February 20.
She was playing in front of her house when Bustamante took her by the arm and told her to come with her to the store, but a neighbour intervened when he noticed the girl asking for help.
(A: So, she was caught and
spilled the beans…)
Lilibeth Bustamante was caught attempting to abduct a 10-year-old girl in Paranaque City on February 20 and later told police horrifying details of the criminal gangs who sell children into sex slavery.
Now, this
will be across the world too. I’ll bet you.
And they put them into all these different movies, the sex movies. And there will be a waiting list of these pervs,
I’m sure, wanting to get first go at these children. And you think you can let
these children live, that can recognize people, folks? You’d better understand what’s happening in
the world here. And no one cares because
you’ve been taught, you’ve been taught
that life is cheap by those who rule you. They’ve trained you step-by-step,
like Huxley saying, knocking you off your pedestal. That’s already done. And people have been taught they’re, oh,
so what, you know.
And your
daily fare is getting towards pedophilia if you watch the television and the stuff they’re pushing on it. And by the way, eventually,
I’ve said before, that eventually the agenda is to knock the pillars down,
step-by-step. The next step is for, they call it intergenerational sex. There will be no such term as
pedophilia. And there will be no crime
either, as they normalize it. And they normalize it when society, the society
is no longer a strong society with strong cultural morals. That’s when they do it. And we’re already
there.
Look what
the folk are watching. They’re stuck on,
they’re addicted to, basically, pornography. Even the stuff they show on
mainstream television as entertainment is just the same kind of stuff. Even in the ads. So articles like this
should, at one time you would have mass movements forming to stop this kind of
thing happening. Not anymore. Because
there’s no opposition. And that’s where
you’ve been brought to step-by-step.
Now, sorry
to prattle on too. As I say, haven’t had
time to work out anything in any way at all. I generally try to talk from the
top of my head which is what I’m doing tonight. I hope you understand that
everything you’ve been trained to believe is, as it is, is completely
different. They have different agendas. That’s why George Orwell showed you what
the Ministry of Love was. It’s the
opposite. And the Ministry of Truth, and
all the other ministries, are the opposites,
folks. But they trained you to believe,
to believe in the name itself. Oh, that’s
wonderful, that’s wonderful, they’re here to take care of us. M-hm.
Well, for
myself, I’d better get out and do some shoveling shortly, I’m Alan Watt from
Ontario, Canada, and it’s good night and may your God or your gods go with you.
Topics of show covered in following links:
Chinese government may have funded the world's first gene-edited
babies, report claims
dailymail.co.uk / 26 Feb 2019
Ocasio-Cortez Poses ‘Legitimate’ Question: ‘Is It Okay to Still Have
Children?’
freebeacon.com / 25 Feb 2019
Ecological Society of America
en.wikipedia.org
‘Julian Huxley and the Continuity of Eugenics in Twentieth-century
Britain’
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
The Rockefeller Foundation's Molecular Vision of Life
cholesterol-and-health.com / 16 Jan 2009
Political and Economic Planning
en.wikipedia.org
The Nature Conservancy
en.wikipedia.org
World Government Summit
un.org / 13 FEb 2017
Zuckerberg outlines 'privacy-focused Vision
dailymail.co.uk / 6 Mar 2019
Real-life child-snatcher reveals how she is paid £15 per abduction by
Philippine gangs who set her a quota of two a week and sell them to paedophiles
with prices determined by their looks
dailymail.co.uk / 28 Feb 2019
Former CIA Whistleblower: Yes, Even the US Post Office Is Spying on You
mintpressnews.com / 1 Mar 2019
As Smart Cities Become Our Norm, We Must Be Smart About a Data Strategy
cigionline.org / 15 Feb 2019
Alphabet's Sidewalk Labs proposed cut of Toronto taxes for smart city
cnbc.com / 15 Feb 2019
Electronic GPS tags to track thousands of criminals in England and
Wales
bbc.com / 16 Feb 2019
The 'happy' girl scout, 17, found with a knife in her back in east
London park - becoming 18th murder victim of 2019 in blood-soaked capital
dailymail.co.uk / 2 Mar 2019
GBI crime lab finds THC in food evidence from Sandtown Middle School
ajc.com / 21 Feb 2019
Canada ordered to pay U.S. concrete company $7M in NAFTA case
ca.news.yahoo.com / 25 Feb 2019
Deepfakes explained: How technology is masking reality
ctvnews.ca / 23 Feb 2019
The Resurgent Idea of World Government
carnegiecouncil.org / 7 July 2008
The Illusion of World Government
foreignaffairs.com / April 1949
And Now for a World Government
ft.com / 8 Dec 2008
Tower of Babel E.U. Parliament Building, Strasbourg
youtube.com / 22 Mar 2016
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
Alan's Materials Available for Purchase and Ordering
Information: |
|||
|
"Cutting Through" |
& |
"Waiting for the Miracle....." |
|
|
Ancient Religions and History MP3
CDs: |
& |
Blurbs and
'Cutting Through the Matrix' Shows on MP3 CDs (Up to 50 Hours per Disc) |
|
|
"Reality
Check Part 1" & "Reality Check Part 2 - Wisdom,
Esoterica and ...TIME" |
|||